Comparing usage statistics for Arch two packages
There are two Arch packages I consider to use. Both of famous Mail Transfer Agents MTAs: msmtp and opensmtpd.
Both might be good for me as a substitute for the now deprecated in Arch ssmtp.
Yet, I don't know which one to choose based on the "community-maintenance" criterion. I prefer to go on the one which is most communally-maintained.
The linked package pages above doesn't present any usage statistics.
How could I know which package is most downloaded or maintained?
arch-linux smtp statistics stability maintenance
asked 1 hour ago
JohnDoeaJohnDoea
931132
add a comment |
There are two Arch packages I consider to use. Both of famous Mail Transfer Agents MTAs: msmtp and opensmtpd.
Both might be good for me as a substitute for the now deprecated in Arch ssmtp.
Yet, I don't know which one to choose based on the "community-maintenance" criterion. I prefer to go on the one which is most communally-maintained.
The linked package pages above doesn't present any usage statistics.
How could I know which package is most downloaded or maintained?
arch-linux smtp statistics stability maintenance
asked 1 hour ago
JohnDoeaJohnDoea
931132
(Not intended to be an answer.) All else being equal (eg features you want, ease of configuration and maintenance), you are better off looking at which package is most actively maintained upstream, and search the internet to see what kinds of problems people have. Just because a package is regularly downloaded from the Arch Linux repos doesn't mean it is actually good quality; vote with your mind, not with the pack.
– cryptarch
1 hour ago
@cryptarch how do you check how much an Arch package is maintained upstream?
– JohnDoea
16 mins ago
@cryptarch As a counterpoint, a high frequency of updates might be more of an indication of instability.
– Sparhawk
16 mins ago
add a comment |
There are two Arch packages I consider to use. Both of famous Mail Transfer Agents MTAs: msmtp and opensmtpd.
Both might be good for me as a substitute for the now deprecated in Arch ssmtp.
Yet, I don't know which one to choose based on the "community-maintenance" criterion. I prefer to go on the one which is most communally-maintained.
The linked package pages above doesn't present any usage statistics.
How could I know which package is most downloaded or maintained?
arch-linux smtp statistics stability maintenance
asked 1 hour ago
JohnDoeaJohnDoea
931132
There are two Arch packages I consider to use. Both of famous Mail Transfer Agents MTAs: msmtp and opensmtpd.
Both might be good for me as a substitute for the now deprecated in Arch ssmtp.
Yet, I don't know which one to choose based on the "community-maintenance" criterion. I prefer to go on the one which is most communally-maintained.
The linked package pages above doesn't present any usage statistics.
How could I know which package is most downloaded or maintained?
arch-linux smtp statistics stability maintenance
arch-linux smtp statistics stability maintenance
asked 1 hour ago
JohnDoeaJohnDoea
931132
asked 1 hour ago
JohnDoeaJohnDoea
931132
edited 8 mins ago
JohnDoea
asked 1 hour ago
JohnDoeaJohnDoea
931132
asked 1 hour ago
JohnDoeaJohnDoea
931132
asked 1 hour ago
JohnDoeaJohnDoea
931132
931132
(Not intended to be an answer.) All else being equal (eg features you want, ease of configuration and maintenance), you are better off looking at which package is most actively maintained upstream, and search the internet to see what kinds of problems people have. Just because a package is regularly downloaded from the Arch Linux repos doesn't mean it is actually good quality; vote with your mind, not with the pack.
– cryptarch
1 hour ago
@cryptarch how do you check how much an Arch package is maintained upstream?
– JohnDoea
16 mins ago
@cryptarch As a counterpoint, a high frequency of updates might be more of an indication of instability.
– Sparhawk
16 mins ago
add a comment |
(Not intended to be an answer.) All else being equal (eg features you want, ease of configuration and maintenance), you are better off looking at which package is most actively maintained upstream, and search the internet to see what kinds of problems people have. Just because a package is regularly downloaded from the Arch Linux repos doesn't mean it is actually good quality; vote with your mind, not with the pack.
– cryptarch
1 hour ago
@cryptarch how do you check how much an Arch package is maintained upstream?
– JohnDoea
16 mins ago
@cryptarch As a counterpoint, a high frequency of updates might be more of an indication of instability.
– Sparhawk
16 mins ago
(Not intended to be an answer.) All else being equal (eg features you want, ease of configuration and maintenance), you are better off looking at which package is most actively maintained upstream, and search the internet to see what kinds of problems people have. Just because a package is regularly downloaded from the Arch Linux repos doesn't mean it is actually good quality; vote with your mind, not with the pack.
– cryptarch
1 hour ago
(Not intended to be an answer.) All else being equal (eg features you want, ease of configuration and maintenance), you are better off looking at which package is most actively maintained upstream, and search the internet to see what kinds of problems people have. Just because a package is regularly downloaded from the Arch Linux repos doesn't mean it is actually good quality; vote with your mind, not with the pack.
– cryptarch
1 hour ago
@cryptarch how do you check how much an Arch package is maintained upstream?
– JohnDoea
16 mins ago
@cryptarch how do you check how much an Arch package is maintained upstream?
– JohnDoea
16 mins ago
@cryptarch As a counterpoint, a high frequency of updates might be more of an indication of instability.
– Sparhawk
16 mins ago
@cryptarch As a counterpoint, a high frequency of updates might be more of an indication of instability.
– Sparhawk
16 mins ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f495383%2fcomparing-usage-statistics-for-arch-two-packages%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f495383%2fcomparing-usage-statistics-for-arch-two-packages%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
(Not intended to be an answer.) All else being equal (eg features you want, ease of configuration and maintenance), you are better off looking at which package is most actively maintained upstream, and search the internet to see what kinds of problems people have. Just because a package is regularly downloaded from the Arch Linux repos doesn't mean it is actually good quality; vote with your mind, not with the pack.
– cryptarch
1 hour ago
@cryptarch how do you check how much an Arch package is maintained upstream?
– JohnDoea
16 mins ago
@cryptarch As a counterpoint, a high frequency of updates might be more of an indication of instability.
– Sparhawk
16 mins ago