LaTeX Editors/IDEs












778















What editors/IDEs are available for easing the process of writing TeX/LaTeX documents?



Please state some useful features like code completion, spell checking, building final DVI or PDF files, etc.





This question is undergoing a systematic refurbishment, see Let’s polish the Editors/IDEs question on Meta. If you’d like to see another editor feature covered here or to take care of an editor that’s not covered yet, share your ideas in that meta question.





List of editors



Links to answers.




  • Archimedes

  • Atom

  • Auto Latex Equations for Google Docs

  • Bakoma TeX Word

  • Compositor

  • Emacs with AUCTeX

  • Emacs with WhizzyTeX

  • gedit with the gedit-LaTeX-plugin

  • Geany with GeanyLaTeX

  • gummi

  • Inlage

  • IntelliJ IDEA

  • jEdit

  • JOVE

  • Kile

  • KTikZ

  • Latexian

  • Latexila

  • LaTeX Base

  • LEd

  • LyX

  • Notepad++

  • Overleaf

  • Open LaTeX Studio

  • Papeeria

  • QuatraTeX

  • RTextDoc

  • DMelt

  • Scientific Word

  • Scientific Workplace

  • Scribes

  • Scribo

  • Sublime Text with LaTeXTools or LaTeXing Plugin

  • ShareLaTeX

  • TechWriter

  • TeXlipse for Eclipse

  • Texmaker

  • TeXnicCenter

  • TeXnicle

  • TexPad

  • Texpen

  • TeXShop

  • TeXStudio

  • TextMate

  • TeXworks

  • Verbosus

  • Vim with LaTeX-Box

  • Vim with LaTeX-plugin

  • Vim with Snipmate plugin and rubber

  • Vim with vimtex

  • Visual Studio Code with LaTeX-Workshop

  • WinEdt

  • Winefish

  • WinShell










share|improve this question




















  • 41





    Wikipedia has a list: Comparison of TeX editors.

    – Caramdir
    Apr 4 '11 at 2:26






  • 2





    Adding structure view, native knitr/sweave support, and auto correct would be great for these comparisons.

    – kennyB
    Nov 7 '14 at 0:13











  • @kennyB Not sure what you mean by 'structure view' (outliner, perhaps?). Knitr/sweave looks to me to be rather specialist plus I'm not quite clear on what would be required. Perhaps this is one to raise on meta, probably as a new thread linked to our older 'tidy up the IDE question' one.

    – Joseph Wright
    Nov 25 '14 at 8:30






  • 2





    Outliner is probably what I mean, yes. This is a frame that contains sections, subsections, tables, figures for easy navigation in large documents.

    – kennyB
    Feb 11 '15 at 23:02











  • Also here is a list of TeX editing softwares for Linuz. What is good LaTeX editor software on Linux?

    – akikara
    Feb 21 '15 at 11:59
















778















What editors/IDEs are available for easing the process of writing TeX/LaTeX documents?



Please state some useful features like code completion, spell checking, building final DVI or PDF files, etc.





This question is undergoing a systematic refurbishment, see Let’s polish the Editors/IDEs question on Meta. If you’d like to see another editor feature covered here or to take care of an editor that’s not covered yet, share your ideas in that meta question.





List of editors



Links to answers.




  • Archimedes

  • Atom

  • Auto Latex Equations for Google Docs

  • Bakoma TeX Word

  • Compositor

  • Emacs with AUCTeX

  • Emacs with WhizzyTeX

  • gedit with the gedit-LaTeX-plugin

  • Geany with GeanyLaTeX

  • gummi

  • Inlage

  • IntelliJ IDEA

  • jEdit

  • JOVE

  • Kile

  • KTikZ

  • Latexian

  • Latexila

  • LaTeX Base

  • LEd

  • LyX

  • Notepad++

  • Overleaf

  • Open LaTeX Studio

  • Papeeria

  • QuatraTeX

  • RTextDoc

  • DMelt

  • Scientific Word

  • Scientific Workplace

  • Scribes

  • Scribo

  • Sublime Text with LaTeXTools or LaTeXing Plugin

  • ShareLaTeX

  • TechWriter

  • TeXlipse for Eclipse

  • Texmaker

  • TeXnicCenter

  • TeXnicle

  • TexPad

  • Texpen

  • TeXShop

  • TeXStudio

  • TextMate

  • TeXworks

  • Verbosus

  • Vim with LaTeX-Box

  • Vim with LaTeX-plugin

  • Vim with Snipmate plugin and rubber

  • Vim with vimtex

  • Visual Studio Code with LaTeX-Workshop

  • WinEdt

  • Winefish

  • WinShell










share|improve this question




















  • 41





    Wikipedia has a list: Comparison of TeX editors.

    – Caramdir
    Apr 4 '11 at 2:26






  • 2





    Adding structure view, native knitr/sweave support, and auto correct would be great for these comparisons.

    – kennyB
    Nov 7 '14 at 0:13











  • @kennyB Not sure what you mean by 'structure view' (outliner, perhaps?). Knitr/sweave looks to me to be rather specialist plus I'm not quite clear on what would be required. Perhaps this is one to raise on meta, probably as a new thread linked to our older 'tidy up the IDE question' one.

    – Joseph Wright
    Nov 25 '14 at 8:30






  • 2





    Outliner is probably what I mean, yes. This is a frame that contains sections, subsections, tables, figures for easy navigation in large documents.

    – kennyB
    Feb 11 '15 at 23:02











  • Also here is a list of TeX editing softwares for Linuz. What is good LaTeX editor software on Linux?

    – akikara
    Feb 21 '15 at 11:59














778












778








778


606






What editors/IDEs are available for easing the process of writing TeX/LaTeX documents?



Please state some useful features like code completion, spell checking, building final DVI or PDF files, etc.





This question is undergoing a systematic refurbishment, see Let’s polish the Editors/IDEs question on Meta. If you’d like to see another editor feature covered here or to take care of an editor that’s not covered yet, share your ideas in that meta question.





List of editors



Links to answers.




  • Archimedes

  • Atom

  • Auto Latex Equations for Google Docs

  • Bakoma TeX Word

  • Compositor

  • Emacs with AUCTeX

  • Emacs with WhizzyTeX

  • gedit with the gedit-LaTeX-plugin

  • Geany with GeanyLaTeX

  • gummi

  • Inlage

  • IntelliJ IDEA

  • jEdit

  • JOVE

  • Kile

  • KTikZ

  • Latexian

  • Latexila

  • LaTeX Base

  • LEd

  • LyX

  • Notepad++

  • Overleaf

  • Open LaTeX Studio

  • Papeeria

  • QuatraTeX

  • RTextDoc

  • DMelt

  • Scientific Word

  • Scientific Workplace

  • Scribes

  • Scribo

  • Sublime Text with LaTeXTools or LaTeXing Plugin

  • ShareLaTeX

  • TechWriter

  • TeXlipse for Eclipse

  • Texmaker

  • TeXnicCenter

  • TeXnicle

  • TexPad

  • Texpen

  • TeXShop

  • TeXStudio

  • TextMate

  • TeXworks

  • Verbosus

  • Vim with LaTeX-Box

  • Vim with LaTeX-plugin

  • Vim with Snipmate plugin and rubber

  • Vim with vimtex

  • Visual Studio Code with LaTeX-Workshop

  • WinEdt

  • Winefish

  • WinShell










share|improve this question
















What editors/IDEs are available for easing the process of writing TeX/LaTeX documents?



Please state some useful features like code completion, spell checking, building final DVI or PDF files, etc.





This question is undergoing a systematic refurbishment, see Let’s polish the Editors/IDEs question on Meta. If you’d like to see another editor feature covered here or to take care of an editor that’s not covered yet, share your ideas in that meta question.





List of editors



Links to answers.




  • Archimedes

  • Atom

  • Auto Latex Equations for Google Docs

  • Bakoma TeX Word

  • Compositor

  • Emacs with AUCTeX

  • Emacs with WhizzyTeX

  • gedit with the gedit-LaTeX-plugin

  • Geany with GeanyLaTeX

  • gummi

  • Inlage

  • IntelliJ IDEA

  • jEdit

  • JOVE

  • Kile

  • KTikZ

  • Latexian

  • Latexila

  • LaTeX Base

  • LEd

  • LyX

  • Notepad++

  • Overleaf

  • Open LaTeX Studio

  • Papeeria

  • QuatraTeX

  • RTextDoc

  • DMelt

  • Scientific Word

  • Scientific Workplace

  • Scribes

  • Scribo

  • Sublime Text with LaTeXTools or LaTeXing Plugin

  • ShareLaTeX

  • TechWriter

  • TeXlipse for Eclipse

  • Texmaker

  • TeXnicCenter

  • TeXnicle

  • TexPad

  • Texpen

  • TeXShop

  • TeXStudio

  • TextMate

  • TeXworks

  • Verbosus

  • Vim with LaTeX-Box

  • Vim with LaTeX-plugin

  • Vim with Snipmate plugin and rubber

  • Vim with vimtex

  • Visual Studio Code with LaTeX-Workshop

  • WinEdt

  • Winefish

  • WinShell







editors big-list ide






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Oct 21 '17 at 20:24


























community wiki





30 revs, 20 users 37%
unknown









  • 41





    Wikipedia has a list: Comparison of TeX editors.

    – Caramdir
    Apr 4 '11 at 2:26






  • 2





    Adding structure view, native knitr/sweave support, and auto correct would be great for these comparisons.

    – kennyB
    Nov 7 '14 at 0:13











  • @kennyB Not sure what you mean by 'structure view' (outliner, perhaps?). Knitr/sweave looks to me to be rather specialist plus I'm not quite clear on what would be required. Perhaps this is one to raise on meta, probably as a new thread linked to our older 'tidy up the IDE question' one.

    – Joseph Wright
    Nov 25 '14 at 8:30






  • 2





    Outliner is probably what I mean, yes. This is a frame that contains sections, subsections, tables, figures for easy navigation in large documents.

    – kennyB
    Feb 11 '15 at 23:02











  • Also here is a list of TeX editing softwares for Linuz. What is good LaTeX editor software on Linux?

    – akikara
    Feb 21 '15 at 11:59














  • 41





    Wikipedia has a list: Comparison of TeX editors.

    – Caramdir
    Apr 4 '11 at 2:26






  • 2





    Adding structure view, native knitr/sweave support, and auto correct would be great for these comparisons.

    – kennyB
    Nov 7 '14 at 0:13











  • @kennyB Not sure what you mean by 'structure view' (outliner, perhaps?). Knitr/sweave looks to me to be rather specialist plus I'm not quite clear on what would be required. Perhaps this is one to raise on meta, probably as a new thread linked to our older 'tidy up the IDE question' one.

    – Joseph Wright
    Nov 25 '14 at 8:30






  • 2





    Outliner is probably what I mean, yes. This is a frame that contains sections, subsections, tables, figures for easy navigation in large documents.

    – kennyB
    Feb 11 '15 at 23:02











  • Also here is a list of TeX editing softwares for Linuz. What is good LaTeX editor software on Linux?

    – akikara
    Feb 21 '15 at 11:59








41




41





Wikipedia has a list: Comparison of TeX editors.

– Caramdir
Apr 4 '11 at 2:26





Wikipedia has a list: Comparison of TeX editors.

– Caramdir
Apr 4 '11 at 2:26




2




2





Adding structure view, native knitr/sweave support, and auto correct would be great for these comparisons.

– kennyB
Nov 7 '14 at 0:13





Adding structure view, native knitr/sweave support, and auto correct would be great for these comparisons.

– kennyB
Nov 7 '14 at 0:13













@kennyB Not sure what you mean by 'structure view' (outliner, perhaps?). Knitr/sweave looks to me to be rather specialist plus I'm not quite clear on what would be required. Perhaps this is one to raise on meta, probably as a new thread linked to our older 'tidy up the IDE question' one.

– Joseph Wright
Nov 25 '14 at 8:30





@kennyB Not sure what you mean by 'structure view' (outliner, perhaps?). Knitr/sweave looks to me to be rather specialist plus I'm not quite clear on what would be required. Perhaps this is one to raise on meta, probably as a new thread linked to our older 'tidy up the IDE question' one.

– Joseph Wright
Nov 25 '14 at 8:30




2




2





Outliner is probably what I mean, yes. This is a frame that contains sections, subsections, tables, figures for easy navigation in large documents.

– kennyB
Feb 11 '15 at 23:02





Outliner is probably what I mean, yes. This is a frame that contains sections, subsections, tables, figures for easy navigation in large documents.

– kennyB
Feb 11 '15 at 23:02













Also here is a list of TeX editing softwares for Linuz. What is good LaTeX editor software on Linux?

– akikara
Feb 21 '15 at 11:59





Also here is a list of TeX editing softwares for Linuz. What is good LaTeX editor software on Linux?

– akikara
Feb 21 '15 at 11:59










54 Answers
54






active

oldest

votes













1 2
next












325















Emacs with AUCTeX — emacs auctex





  • Platforms: Windows, Mac (incl. Aquamacs fork), Unix


  • License: Free software (GPL)


  • Languages: de, dk, fr, is, it, jp, nl, pl, se, sk are supported by AUCTeX language styles


  • Unicode: Yes, from Emacs 23, characters are represented using Unicode


  • RTL/bidirectional support: From Emacs 24, through bidi-mode


  • % !TeX directives: No, but has several realizations of file local variables


  • Syntax highlighting: Yes, customisable through customize and Elisp


  • Code completion: Yes


  • Code folding: Yes


  • Spell checking: Yes


  • SyncTeX: Yes


  • Built-in output viewer: Yes


  • Project management: org-mode, reftex-mode, speedbar




Emacs is one of the oldest programmable editors, which has basic support for TeX and friends. AUCTeX is a plugin to Emacs which provides a much more advanced support for editing LaTeX, ConTeXt, docTeX, Texinfo, and Plain TeX documents. It comes with a sophisticated auto-completion mechanism for environments and commands, supporting by default more than two hundreds LaTeX packages (but virtually any package can be automatically parsed in order to provide autocompletion for its commands and environments).



Emacs with sample file loaded



(In this screenshot, visual-line-mode is enabled. In this mode, lines that are wider than the window are broken between words. The line breaks are not added to the source file.)



RefTeX is another plugin to Emacs, independent from and complementary to AUCTeX, which aids you with the management of bibliographic sources. It makes all your references as easy to find as a C-c <key>, for both BibTeX and biblatex, and also provides convenient shortcuts for navigating between sections in your document, bound by default to C-c =:



Screenshot featuring RefTeX's outliner
(Note that colour themes are completely customizable)



AUCTeX supports multi-file parsing, so that huge documents with input or include commands are easily compiled with C-c C-c from any of their files. No more going back to the master file in order to compile.



AUCTeX's preview-latex offers WYSIWYG previewing of formulae.



Interesting features of Emacs:




  • Use table-insert along with table-generate-source and table-recognize-* functions to easily create a base for your tables.

  • Lots of useful keyboard shortcuts

  • Extensively documented, both in Emacs, via the Emacs and AUCTeX Texinfo manuals, and via many books in several languages.

  • Supports most of vim's features and keybindings through evil-mode.






share|improve this answer





















  • 31





    You should mention how good reftex is.

    – Seamus
    Oct 3 '10 at 20:30






  • 9





    C-c C-s to create a section (with optional label), C-c C-e to create an environment of your choice (open and close tags)...

    – Seamus
    Nov 9 '10 at 15:57






  • 11





    You should try out orgtbl-mode, it's really awesome. Here's a good tutorial.

    – Oscar
    Nov 14 '10 at 15:49






  • 4





    Using Emacs (AUCTeX) as a TeX editor has another advantage, namely the ability to select rectangles (select by column rather than row) - which makes dealing with tables/tabular environments a bit easier. (The outline mode with AUCTeX is very useful too, for long documents, allowing one to "hide" or "fold" sections.) TeXWorks is not bad, especially as an out-of-the-box editor (Emacs always requires a bit more fiddling)

    – emacsomancer
    Dec 9 '10 at 5:17






  • 11





    C-u C-c C-e allows you to change the current environment (eg. from align to align*) C-c C-. marks the current environment. C-c C-* marks the current section. C-c C-m allows you to insert a macro (it has a large autocomplete list...)

    – Seamus
    Jun 1 '11 at 16:48



















296















TeXstudio — texstudio



(formerly TexMakerX)





  • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8/10, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD


  • License: GPL v2


  • Languages: cs, de, en, es, fr, hu, ja, pl, pt_BR, ru, vi, zh_CN


  • Unicode: Yes


  • RTL/bidi: experimental


  • % !TeX directives: Yes


  • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


  • Code Completion: Yes, customizable and auto-customized


  • Code Folding: Yes


  • Spell Checking: Yes, including grammar checking based on LanguageTool.


  • SyncTeX: Yes


  • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, supports PDF


  • Project Management: Yes




I'd recommend TeXstudio an interesting fork of Texmaker that I find more usable and customizable.



Here is a screen shot of TeXStudio.



TeXstudio sample document screen shot



Other pros:




  • cross-platform,

  • writing support (incr. search, folding, navigation, auto-completion, custom macros)

  • inline interactive spell-checking

  • support to the main latex tools, including tikz, pstricks, etc.

  • multi-views: math, structure

  • svn support

  • runs in a usb

  • pdf viewer included, but can be configured to use external viewers (also with synctex)

  • live-updating inline preview for formulas and code segments

  • tools for easy table editing and table-code formatting

  • multiple cursors

  • smart BibTeX auto-complete (including multiple, comma-separated citations) and hovering on cite text shows a preview of the BibTeX entry

  • document templates

  • very active and responsive developer and community

  • adjustable icon size makes it suitable for high resolution displays (preferences->show advanced options->gui scaling)


Cons:




  • Does not support split editor






share|improve this answer





















  • 6





    Is there some place listing the differences between Texmaker and TeXstudio?

    – DevSolar
    Sep 13 '11 at 7:31






  • 11





    TeXStudio isn't Texmaker with additional features. It was forked years ago and there are more differences now as there were in the beginning. I tried both and somehow prefer Texmaker, it just feels cleaner to me.

    – doblak
    Nov 26 '11 at 17:35






  • 12





    TexStudio, is recommended by MikTex distribution in their manual as an advanced choice editor, after spending some time toying with TexWorks (the basic choice if you are a total beginner). I couldn't stay long with TexWorks, while TexStudio is there inviting with its many features. For spell checking and language, there is some nice plugin with great potential called language tool.

    – doctorate
    May 25 '13 at 16:12








  • 20





    After using TexMaker for a year I switched to TexStudio. It has much more features, but the selling point was the much better support of custom shortcuts. It's also blazingly fast on my low-end laptop, compared to TexMaker.

    – Dwelle
    Jun 11 '13 at 12:17






  • 9





    I switched from TexMaker to TexStudio quite some time ago and haven't looked back.

    – Nicholas Hamilton
    Feb 4 '14 at 10:06





















285















Vim with LaTeX-suite — vim latex-suite





  • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Linux and others


  • License: Open Source Charityware


  • Languages: ?


  • Unicode: Yes


  • RTL/bidi support: partially


  • % !TEX directives: No, but has modelines


  • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


  • Code Completion: Yes (using Omni Completion, extendable with SnipMate plugin)


  • Code Folding: Yes


  • Spell Checking: Yes


  • SyncTeX: Yes, see e.g. this question


  • Built-in Output Viewer: No


  • Project Management: ?




If you're really hardcore, you can always use Vim. There's a suite of macros and whatnot appropriate for Vim which can be used to edit LaTeX files.



Vim sample document screen shot



You can have word/command completion via <C-P> and <C-N>, to go the previous and next matches, respectively.



There is a version of Vim with graphical menus, called gVim. If it is used with LaTeX-suite, then various TeX commands are displayed in the menu bar for quick insertion in the text. (For Mac, there is a native build called MacVim.)



Features



Vim also allows for code folding, the package vim-latex offers automatic code folding. Folding can also be done manually based on a key (e.g., {{{ and }}}) to open and close automatic folds. Example of folds can be seen as follows:



vim code folds



As per original question, some other useful features not listed elsewhere in this post include



VIM




  • Regular Expressions

  • Powerful keyboard short-cuts/commands

  • Extremely customizable

  • Smart Indenting


LaTeX-Suite




  • Calling the compiler is quick with ll; viewing the result is lv

  • Environments accessible with three letter sequences in insert mode:



    • EEQ = equation environment


    • EFI = figure environment



  • Place-holders (<+text+>) can be jumped to with Ctrl-J without leaving insert mode

  • Inverse searching: Double click in (supported) pdf viewer and you jump to corresponding tex source line


For issues, pull request and installation from github see here.






share|improve this answer





















  • 13





    I definitely second the Vim recommendation. For instance, it's very easy to define all kinds of keyboard shortcuts (e.g. for me 5prop turns into begin{proposition} end{proposition}) that make typing very easy.

    – Akhil Mathew
    Jul 31 '10 at 0:17






  • 3





    And even if you don't want to use the vim-latex macros, you can define silly short cuts like I do: dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~ww278/#texres

    – Willie Wong
    Aug 3 '10 at 16:20






  • 2





    vim (with plugins) and a Makefile.

    – Johan
    Aug 15 '10 at 9:40






  • 3





    There is always gVim for those of you who don't like the command line. and the vim-latex plugin is very helpful for completion of commands.

    – Dom
    Feb 17 '11 at 16:29






  • 4





    @AymanElmasry: It's not the fault of vim-latex, it's the fault of your distribution's package stating its dependency on texlive-2007. You could either tell your package manager to ignore dependencies for the package, install a "dummy" package, or install the plugin manually instead of going through the package manager.

    – DevSolar
    Jun 20 '12 at 7:48



















241















Texmaker — texmaker





  • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8, OS X 10.5+, Linux


  • License: GPL license, free


  • Languages: cs, de, el, en, es, fa, fr, gl, hu, it, nl, pl, pt, pt (bra), ru, se, sr, zh (cn), zh (tw)


  • Unicode: Yes


  • RTL/bidi: ?


  • % !TEX directives: No


  • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


  • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


  • Code Folding: Yes


  • Spell Checking: Yes


  • SyncTeX: Yes


  • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, supports PDF


  • Project Management: Yes


Texmaker sample document screen shot



Customizable code completion

Customizable code completion



Rectangular block selection

Rectangular block selection





The editor TeXstudio started out as a fork of Texmaker and was originally called TexMakerX.






share|improve this answer





















  • 13





    texmaker and the forked texmakerx sounded quite interesting, but then I realized that they support only LaTeX. Not so useful for a plain&ConTeXt user.

    – Taco Hoekwater
    Nov 12 '10 at 14:07






  • 3





    The texmakerx fork is new to me. Thanx for the tip!

    – Egon Willighagen
    Dec 16 '10 at 10:16






  • 27





    This is the best Latex IDE for beginners. I tried TexWorks, TexNicCenter, Notepad++ and TexMaker. And found TexMaker to be the most user friendly for newbies.

    – Marcel Valdez Orozco
    Sep 9 '12 at 19:21






  • 13





    The most useful feature of texmaker is missing in this list: whenever you have a main-tex, which input{} other content-tex, you can tell texmaker which tex is to run (called Master Document). So you don't have to switch to the main, press F1 (for Quick Build), and switch back to the tex you are currently working on. Just do your changes in the content.tex, press F1, and view the results. Second best feature I haven't seen with other IDEs: The build-in document viewer jumps to and highlights for some seconds the latest changes. I simply love that!

    – Dominikus K.
    Mar 6 '13 at 15:13








  • 4





    -1 TexMaker does some arcane evaluation of regular expressions in its search and replace box. This is wholely inappropriate in a LaTeX editor because of the common use of various characters between LaTeX and regex. The result is that one cannot simply replace all section{ with subsection{.

    – alx9r
    Apr 12 '13 at 18:20



















175















TeXworks — texworks





  • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8, OS X, Linux all pre-compiled plus source available


  • License: GPL


  • Languages: en, af, ar, ca, cs, de, fa, fo fr, it, ja, nl, ko, pl, pl, ru, sl, tr zh


  • Unicode: Yes


  • RTL/bidi: Yes


  • % !TEX directives: Yes


  • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, regex-based


  • Code Completion: Yes, customizable based on 'known entry' list


  • Code Folding: No


  • Spell Checking: Yes, but have to install by hand


  • SyncTeX: Yes


  • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, PDF (Poppler-based, auto-follow option to scroll source and preview together)


  • Project Management: No




Screen shot of TeXworks on the Mac: the layout stays the same on Windows and Linux:



TeXworks sample document screen shot on Mac





On Windows and Linux, I use TeXworks, which provides with an editor window and a document preview window. Clicking in the document preview locates the edit mark at that TeX source corresponding to the clicked location.






share|improve this answer





















  • 8





    The fact that TeXWorks has both the goodies of a GUI (you can easily and instantly see what you get) and a pure text editor like Emacs (you, not a program, writes the code) really makes it a hot shot.

    – Tomas Aschan
    Aug 4 '10 at 16:51






  • 2





    +1 for TeXWorks --- still needs a few features that I can't live without, but I'm checking the progress regularly and I hope this could turn into the "standard" LaTeX editor.

    – Martin Tapankov
    Aug 19 '10 at 6:02








  • 1





    I love TeXWorks for easy, out-of-the-box two-way sync!

    – Chang
    Oct 21 '11 at 2:13






  • 1





    +1 for non-geek friendliness of TeXworks, which is sort of a paradox with LaTeX. I've used TeXworks to submit papers to IEEE conferences with success.

    – Fuhrmanator
    Aug 21 '12 at 20:29








  • 1





    Accesible dropdown menu to switch between different compilators (pdftex, Context (pdftex), pdflatex ...) A small minus for lack of printing possibility in the integrated pdf viewer.

    – PetaspeedBeaver
    Apr 3 '13 at 11:30





















167















Kile — kile





  • Platforms: Linux, Windows1 (XP, Vista, 7)


  • License: GNU GPL 2


  • Languages: bg, bs, ca, cs, da, de, el, en_GB, eo, es, et, fi, fr, ga, gl, hi, hne, hu, it, ja, kk, lt, mai, ms, nb, nds, nl, nn, pl, pt, pt_BR, ro, ru, sk, sv, tr, ug, uk, zh_CN, zh_TW


  • Unicode: Yes


  • RTL/bidi: Yes


  • % !TEX directives: No2


  • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


  • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


  • Code Folding: Yes


  • Spell Checking: Yes [uses system dictionaries so works even for unsupported languages]


  • SyncTeX: Yes (but the -synctex=1 flag must be added manually to the build engine)


  • Built-in Output Viewer: Limited3 (PNG preview of snippets – e.g. current environment or selection – converted from DVI/PS/PDF)


  • Project Management: Yes


  • Command Line: Yes


  • Structure/Outline View: Yes


  • VI Input Mode: Yes


Sample document in Kile on Windows with default settings and structure view open.



1 Starting from version 3.0, there is a windows installer available.
Installation instructions for 2.x versions can be found here.
The Windows version of the KDE applications is not finalised, so some of them may be unstable.



2 While Kile does not have !TeX directives for defining compilation tool etc., it does have some "magic comments", similar to Latexila and TeXStudio. They are %TODO and %FIXME, which appears in the structure view, for adding notes in the code, and %BEGIN/%END for defining foldable regions of code.



3 A full built-in output viewer will be available in Kile 3 and is already available by compiling the Kile git master branch






share|improve this answer





















  • 9





    Kile is a wonderful program for LaTeX editing, some of the features like creating tables automatically, image insertion, and list/enumeration macros are extremely helpful. As a beginner, Kile basically taught me LaTeX. +1!

    – EricR
    Jul 27 '10 at 15:41






  • 25





    Kile is the editor when you're on Linux, and find that vim/emacs is too much effort to learn.

    – Martin Tapankov
    Aug 19 '10 at 5:44






  • 8





    Kile's the editor I've been looking for for years. Few nagging "features" that can all be disabled, everything's customizable to my likings (and I have very special ones indeed) and so on.

    – David
    Dec 11 '11 at 19:43








  • 3





    @RyanReich GNOME the de facto standard desktop? Maybe in the US, where Red Hat is strong, but certainly not in Europe.

    – mafp
    Jan 16 '13 at 22:02






  • 4





    I just installed it and been using all day. I think this is the best latex editor I tried so far, and I tried few. Easy to use.

    – Nasser
    Jun 17 '13 at 22:25



















159















Sublime Text with LaTeXTools plugin



Available for: Windows, Mac, Linux





This is a simple, but powerful, editor. It's similar to Notepad++, but available on multiple platforms, and much easier to setup for LaTeX with the LaTeXTools plugin, which is available from the Package Control tool. It is also similar to TextMate, but is being actively developed and has a huge community which develops plug-ins for. It's also much prettier than both of them!



Note that this commercial software, and inquires a licence after an evaluation period (costs $70 USD). It is possible to run Sublime Text without buying a licence, but you will be reminded that you are using an unregistered copy.



Sublime Text features some really powerful tools when it comes to typing, some of which you don't understand that you could do without:




  • multiple cursors

  • go-to anything

  • snippets

  • incremental find

  • project management

  • numerous build-systems


and more (take a look at Perfect Workflow in Sublime Text 2). The screenshot below also displays its feature for finding citations from BibTeX.



Sublime Text is an almost completely text based editor, with almost unlimited potential. The list of features is about as long as you want it to be. Install Package Manager, and you have a long list of repositories only a few seconds install-on-the-fly away.





  • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Unix


  • Licence: Free to try, free to buy


  • % !TEX directives: Yes


  • Syntax highlighting: Yes


  • Code completion: Yes


  • Code folding: Yes


  • Spell check: Yes, both built-in and external packages


  • SyncTeX: Yes


  • Built-in output viewer: No


  • Project management: Yes


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 4





    The evaluation period can last forever, I've been using it for over a year.

    – levesque
    Feb 27 '13 at 20:06






  • 13





    Also, when used with Skim you get a very, very fast compiling PDF viewer that syncs with your code to give you the same PDF functionality that other editors provide.

    – BoZiffer
    Mar 15 '13 at 1:44













  • The video "Perfect Workflow in Sublime Text 2" is no longer available. Is there a good video for replacement?

    – Martin Thoma
    Mar 16 '14 at 18:56






  • 1





    Definitely recommend Sublime. It has vim integration, has spellchecking... Whatever you want, you can find it here! It is THE solution for all platforms :) A pity that it hasn't been voted higher up, that when I first viewed this list I didn't notice it.

    – xji
    Jun 11 '14 at 0:34








  • 3





    What on Earth does 'free to buy' mean?! Also, I am very pleased to know that it has features which I 'don't understand I could do without'. This seems very likely true since it has features of which I am entirely unaware and it is extremely probable that there are some I can do without ;).

    – cfr
    Oct 19 '14 at 23:31



















114














TexShop



Available for: Mac

Open Source





In Mac I use TexShop, shipped with MacTeX, and works smoothly together with MacTeX.



Among the features that it has are:



Editing features




  • syntax highlighting

  • source/PDF synchronization

  • autocompletion of commands and environments

  • macros

  • stationery (for document templates)

  • latex panel of commonly used symbols

  • matrix panel for simple array input

  • import spreadsheet cells with LaTeX formatting

  • regex search/replace


Processing features




  • built-in support for TeX, LaTeX, Xe(La)TeX, Lua(La)TeX, ConTeXt, BibTeX, biber

  • built-in support for Sketch, Asymptote, Sage, LilyPond, LatexMk, MetaPost

  • user definable Engines (scripts to process documents)






share|improve this answer





















  • 9





    I also like TeXShop because you can have side by side source and pdf output, also with two-way synchronization between them (Cmd+Click on a piece of code and you're taken to its place on the output). The only things I miss are tabs to organize many open files and better project management.

    – Juan A. Navarro
    Jul 30 '10 at 6:08






  • 5





    I also used TeXShop, as it is a very clean and powerful editor with a great pdf viewer included. I abandoned it because I wanted code folding and a structure (tree) view for faster navigation in my large document and therefore now I use TexMakerX (tex.stackexchange.com/questions/339/latex-editors-ides/…) for my thesis (and TeXShop sometimes for smaller documents)

    – MostlyHarmless
    Apr 8 '11 at 18:30






  • 3





    Did they remove that feature? TeXShop used to support the use of an external editor!

    – cfr
    Dec 22 '13 at 0:33











  • I consider it a rather large drawback that TexShop is only available for Mac and not other platforms.

    – Peter Pablo
    Apr 22 '15 at 14:03











  • I use TexShop in combination with neoVim and some Latex and Snipmate Plugins. Works like a charm! There may not be an official "external editor" feature (idk), but you can open a main file with texshop and edit the content files with whatever editor you like.

    – mike
    Dec 7 '15 at 9:32



















99















TeXnicCenter — texniccenter





  • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8/10

  • Open Source


  • Languages: English, German, more dictionaries for spelling control downloadable


  • Unicode: Yes (in version 2, which was released mid-september 2013).


  • RTL/bidi: ?


  • % !TEX directives: No


  • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable (also background colour)


  • Code Completion: Yes


  • Code Folding: Yes


  • Spell Checking: Yes


  • SyncTeX: Yes


  • Built-in Output Viewer: No. You can config TeXnicCenter to use an external PDF viewer like Acrobat Reader or SumatraPDF with synchronized viewing.


  • Project Management: Yes




I highly recommend TeXnicCenter. It stands out because it is the right mix between a GUI heavy editor (think Lyx) and no GUI (think emacs). Moreover, it is very easy to setup on Windows; and it integrates with MiKTeX without requiring extra configuration.



An easy-to-navigate user interface provides a document tree, editor and compiling output as well as a vast array of drop-down menus:



TeXnicCenter GUI
Click image to enlarge



Customizable profiles allow for manipulating of latex, bibtex and makeindex parameters, as well as post-processing features and viewer parameters (e.g. forward and backward search):



TeXnicCenter profiles
Click image to enlarge



TeXnicCenter also allows to jump directly to the line that caused an error and provides code completion. TeXnicCenter has easy and integrated project management tools, and handles multiple files conveniently. It can be synchronized with pdf viewers such as Adobe Reader or SumatraPDF to provide forward and backward search options. Forward and backward search lets user jump and navigate between LaTeX code and pdf output seamlessly.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    I've been using TeXnicCenter for years. It's great!

    – Rebekah
    Jul 27 '10 at 16:36











  • Yup, still using it. Don't see too much development on it lately, but I have an old installation together with MikTeX and works pretty well.

    – Leonardo Herrera
    Jul 27 '10 at 16:48






  • 2





    TeXnicCenter does not run on linux directly, but perhaps through wine?

    – fryguybob
    Jul 27 '10 at 16:49











  • @percusse It supports UTF-8 (or we jus got lucky with our 200+ page book and the Hungarian (magyar) accented characters áéíóöőúüű). :)

    – masu
    Oct 31 '13 at 9:09













  • @masu Thanks, removed the outdated comment

    – percusse
    Nov 2 '13 at 10:16



















95















ShareLaTeX - Online LaTeX editor in your web browser.



Note: The companies behind ShareLaTeX and Overleaf have merged, and as such the two services will at some point in the future be merged into one. See https://www.overleaf.com/blog/518-exciting-news-sharelatex-is-joining-overleaf#.Wa_pdL8hWV4.




  • Unlimited projects for free

  • latex, pdflatex and XeLaTeX compilers

  • Collaborate with others, see what they are typing in real time like Google documents

  • Auto Complete

  • Multi Language spell check

  • Chat with online collaborators

  • Export and import data

  • Sync with Dropbox

  • Regular snapshots allowing for rolling back

  • Vim and Emacs Bindings

  • Custom Themes

  • Extensive inbuilt template library

  • It's Open Source, so you can install it on your own server


See other peoples cursors



command auto complete



enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    The only decent option if you run Chrome OS

    – DavidR
    Dec 5 '13 at 11:38






  • 9





    I can't understand why this doesn't have more +1's! I've ceased using installed LaTeX programs entirely since finding ShareLaTeX. I can edit the same document from any device I own, even my phone if I'm in a bind. (It's a shame they don't have an app yet; their site, admittedly, just barely works on a phone.)

    – Jonathan Landrum
    Apr 4 '14 at 13:59











  • related: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/3/compiling-documents-online

    – matth
    Jul 3 '15 at 8:31






  • 2





    ShareLaTeX has the shortcoming that its TeX distribution is only periodically updated, but has the advantages of a very well done documentation, with a lot of straightforward and useful examples for beginners, and of an excellent customer assistance.

    – CarLaTeX
    Feb 15 '17 at 10:53











  • Moreover, it is open source so you can also spin up a local version of it which means you don't need internet.

    – Melvin Roest
    Apr 4 '18 at 17:11



















94














LyX



Available for: Windows, Mac, and Linux

Open Source





I use LyX and I love it. From the webpage:




LyX is a document processor that encourages an approach to writing based on the structure of your documents (WYSIWYM) and not simply their appearance (WYSIWYG).
LyX combines the power and flexibility of TeX/LaTeX with the ease of use of a graphical interface. This results in world-class support for creation of mathematical content (via a fully integrated equation editor) and structured documents like academic articles, theses, and books. In addition, staples of scientific authoring such as reference list and index creation come standard. But you can also use LyX to create a letter or a novel or a theatre play or film script. A broad array of ready, well-designed document layouts are built in.




Quite intuitive and user-friendly, and it is possible to import from and (more importantly) export to LaTeX.



Too many useful features to mention, but I'll mention one that I find extra good: If you want to typeset a "2-dimensional" math expression, LyX is the way to go. I have used LyX for nearly ten years. Switched to AUCTeX recently, but I still use LyX whenever I want to get the LaTeX code for a complicated math expression.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 25





    The thing I don't like about LyX (or WYSIWYG-ish in general) is that it puts an emphasis format (that's all you see!) rather than content structure (which is hidden behind the format). LaTeX code does it the other way around, the structure is explicit and this helps you focus on the content rather than the format of your document.

    – Juan A. Navarro
    Jul 30 '10 at 6:01








  • 17





    I really don't like LyX, but I don't think that this is grounds to downvote you :)

    – Vivi
    Jul 30 '10 at 7:40






  • 60





    I really do like LyX, but: LyX is not an LaTeX Editor and we really, really should stop selling it as such! LyX is a document system in its own respect with an own document format, it just uses LaTeX as (one) backend. So every LyX document can be exported to LaTeX, but not every LaTeX document can be imported into LyX (even though simple stuff works pretty well). If collaborating on some document, all or no authors have to use LyX. This, by definition, does not qualify LyX as an "editor".

    – Daniel
    Jan 4 '12 at 9:22








  • 11





    @JuanA.Navarro Interesting, I feel exactly the other way around. When looking at raw LaTeX code, I find it hard to focus on the content, since it is mixed with the structure and formatting aspects of the document. Also, the displaying of chapter and section titles in big, bold fonts (instead of the same way as normal text) makes it much easier for me to understand and modify the structure of my document.

    – rolve
    Apr 9 '13 at 13:43






  • 3





    @rolve, it all depends on how you tend to write your code. I have seen very messy code mixing content/formatting within the body of the document, but by using semantically defined commands you can make the distinction very explicit.

    – Juan A. Navarro
    Apr 9 '13 at 17:59



















71















WinEdt — winedt





  • Platforms: (Windows XP until version 9.1)/Vista/7/8/10


  • License: Shareware, personal license $60


  • Languages: en


  • Unicode: Yes (from version 7)


  • RTL/bidi: Yes (from version 10)


  • % !TEX directives: Probably possible.


  • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable and including a .dtx mode


  • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


  • Code Folding: Yes, customizable (from version 8)


  • Spell Checking: Yes


  • SyncTeX: Yes with appropriate PDF viewer (e.g. SumatraPDF)


  • Built-in Output Viewer: No


  • Project Management: Yes, own project management system and outliner




A lot of useful add-ons for WinEdt can be found on the WinEdt's Community site





enter image description here



WinEdt is a good option on Windows.



I wrote a post on some of the features I liked in WinEdt 6.0.
To summarise:




  • Tree View can be customised

  • Automatically display your current location in TOC

  • Colour coding that aids usability

  • Intelligent defaults

  • Options to customise almost anything

  • Easy configuration interface with MikTeX

  • One click build process for LaTeX documents

  • Intuitive default shortcut keys and intuitive alt menu letters


It's not free, but it's also not that expensive.



WinEdt's new full Unicode support and its translation tables allow to show ∀α in the screen but to write {forall}{alpha} in the disk.






share|improve this answer


























  • @percusse I enjoyed learning LaTeX with WinEdt, but I found that eventually I wanted a true programmer's editor that I could use for a broader range of editing tasks. I know use Vim.

    – Jeromy Anglim
    Aug 22 '11 at 10:40






  • 1





    BTW: DANTE members get a nice discount on the editor: dante.de/index/Intern/WinEdt.html (German)

    – topskip
    Mar 19 '12 at 20:18






  • 2





    I would add search/inverse search possibility - you can jump to the place in the rendered file which you are currently editing, and, more importantly, jump from the place in the dvi file which you are currently reviewing to its TeX code.

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 19 '14 at 4:59



















58














TeXlipse



Available for: Windows, Mac, Linux and others (Java based)

Open Source





I've been happily using TeXlipse in Eclipse for a long time, it has integrated code completion (including BibTeX entries), customizable templates, an outline view - and being integrated into Eclipse it includes all useful stuff I'm used to when working in Eclipse, like editor shortcuts, version control, etc.



There is also an Eclipse pdf viewer plugin Pdf4Eclipse with complete support of SyncTeX, which allows forward and reverse search in LaTeX documents. Since TeXlipse rebuilds the LaTeX sources automatically (in background) after a save, the code and the preview of the document are always synchronized.



Example of TeXlipse together with Pdf4Eclipse
Click image to enlarge






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    Does TeXlipse / Eclipse compile the documents well? Including running pdflatex and bibtex multiple times?

    – Dima
    Jul 27 '10 at 15:04






  • 8





    It's probably worth mentioning that Eclipse might not be the best choice to install as a TeX-only IDE if you don't already have it, just because it's rather large and has many features that aren't needed to write up an assignment, for example.

    – Michael Underwood
    Jul 27 '10 at 20:11






  • 3





    One plugin that is almost essential for PhD writers is integrated SVN/GIT backup using subclipse/eGit. Every edit is retrievable and can be stored in the cloud. There's enough horror stories on the net about losing one's thesis because of a hard-drive failure the week before the viva/printing etc

    – DGarside
    Mar 14 '12 at 21:11








  • 6





    I'm surprised Texlipse scores so low on this. To my mind it is far superior to many of the bespoke LaTeX packages. It automatically flags up errors AS YOU TYPE THEM, and compiles smartly so that minor errors are ignored. Consequently the time spent dealing with errors is greatly reduced. Compiling is a doddle as one can edit while compiling. The "Templates" feature (CTRL + SPACE) is superb. It also runs without installation if like me you are working on a locked-down Windows machine. As mentioned above SVN is a major plus.

    – Nick Riches
    Feb 11 '13 at 11:07








  • 3





    My problem is that Eclipse needs to put everything in projects, so you don't simply edit and compile a .tex file. Instead you have to click through the New Project Wizard. Or am I wrong?

    – marczellm
    Mar 9 '13 at 10:34



















51














Gummi





  • Platforms: Linux (unstable development version for Windows exists)


  • License: Open Source (MIT)


  • Languages: ar, ca, cs, da, de, el, es, fr, hu, it, nl, pl, pt, pt-BR, ro, ru, zh-CN, zh-TW


  • Unicode: Yes


  • RTL/bidi support: ?


  • % !TEX directives: Yes


  • Syntax Highlighting: Yes


  • Code Completion: No


  • Code Folding: No,


  • Spell Checking: Yes (liited


  • SyncTeX: Yes


  • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes


  • Project Management: Yes




Emacs is great, but what I generally use is Gummi. It has a 2-pane live preview which is really useful for catching syntax errors and formatting errors early on. Plus, when you save your latex document it will automatically save a pdf copy. Other features include helpers for matrix and table editing, inserting images, and a citing tool. Even better, there are configurable snippets of code. For example just writing "item" + Tab write an itemize environment and the first item, and left the cursor after item.



It should be noted that Gummi really work with a hidden temporal copy as .file.tex.swp (instead that directly with file.tex) for previews, and the same happen with auxiliary files. This have the advantage that your working directory apparently remain clean but occasionally this can produce unexpected errors (e.g., using jobname in Gummi)



screenshot






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Gummi is really useful when you are creating the code for a picture (eg PSTricks or Tikz). You'll see your picture change as you add to your code.

    – DJP
    Jul 22 '11 at 16:02













  • Gummi is a really minimalist, distraction-free excellent piece of code. The Windows version is not so often updated, but works fine.

    – Frederico Lopes
    Oct 16 '12 at 19:16






  • 4





    +1 for distraction-and-clutter-free beginner-friendliness!

    – nutty about natty
    Mar 30 '13 at 18:49











  • -1 for lack of support for luatex :(

    – nutty about natty
    Aug 13 '17 at 19:35



















50














Notepad++





  • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8


  • License: Free software (GPL)


  • Languages: en, zh, fr, es, hu, ru, nl, pl, de, it, da, cs, sl, sk, uk, tr, pt, no, sv, ca, ar, lt, gl, fi, el, ro, ko, he, fa, sgs, bg, id, sq, ja, hr, ka, eu, be, sr, nn, th, ms, oc, fur, lb, tl, uz, kk, af, ky, mk, lv, ta, az, bs, eo, lij, hi, sc, ug, te, an, si


  • Unicode: Yes


  • RTL/bidi: Yes


  • % !TEX directives: No


  • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable (also background color)


  • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


  • Code Folding: Yes


  • Spell Checking: Yes (through DSpellCheck)


  • SyncTeX: Yes


  • Built-in Output Viewer: No. You can configure notepad++ to use an external PDF viewer like Acrobat Reader or SumatraPDF with forward and backward searching.


  • Project Management: Yes (no master file)




notepad++ sample document screen shot



I use Notepad++ and I love it. It has all the powerful features you expect from a good text editor (powerful find/replace, regex, macros, plugin support, etc.) and lots of features for coding, like syntax highlighting (and it has built-in rules for TeX), code folding, etc. The best part is that you can map keys to run external programs, so all you have to do is tap a bound key and it instantly runs your favorite compiler or automator and displays your output in one step, outputting errors in the command window if there are any.



It's not made exclusively for TeX, but if you're on Windows and want to use a single text editor for many purposes, one of which is TeX, Notepad++ is a very good option.





This question has answers with two methods of setting up the connection between notepad++ and a TeX distribution, as well as with SumatraPDF.






share|improve this answer


























  • I would really second this approach as Notepad++ has capabilities far beyond what any editor on Windows have. (from my experience). The easiness in creating macros, recording, etc. is surprising and it does all this with one program!

    – zeroth
    Mar 25 '12 at 18:09











  • .bib syntax highlighting is available as an add-on as well. And regex find/replace built in is very useful.

    – Chris H
    Jul 31 '13 at 13:40













  • I use notepad++ for my bib files, as it is more bare bones and easier to get what I want done. Also if I don't use emacs a lot it is hard to flip into its shortcuts from windows programs, though I admit it is better for what I want to do.

    – Canageek
    Jul 2 '14 at 17:52











  • I particularly agree with the last-but-one paragraph "if you're on Windows...".

    – MattAllegro
    Nov 10 '14 at 21:28











  • There is a native Linux port of Notepad++: see askubuntu.com/a/413179/16395 (I do not know if it has the same LaTeX capabilty, though).

    – Rmano
    Apr 12 '16 at 14:31





















50















Atom with latex, latex-plus, or latextools packages





  • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Linux


  • Licence: Open source (MIT license)


  • % !TEX directives: Yes


  • Syntax highlighting: Yes (with language-latex package), customizable


  • Code completion: Yes, customizable


  • Code folding: Yes


  • Spell check: Yes


  • SyncTeX: Yes


  • Built-in output viewer: Yes (with pdf-view package)


  • Project management: Yes (with atom-project-manager package)




Atom is a modern, approachable, yet throughly hackable text editor based on web technologies, with a large community providing extensions through its highly customizable package system. Atom has packages providing Git integration, BibTeX autocompletion and many other features. It draws frequent comparisons with Sublime Text, but has the notable advantage of being open source and completely free.



To compile LaTeX from within the editor, one may choose from a number of packages: latex, latex-plus, and latextools. The last one is an ongoing port of Sublime Text's LaTeXTools plugin and seems to be the most feature-rich of the three (as of 2016-03-20), with additional goodies like reference and bibliography completion as well as environment wrapping. Alternatively, the latexer package also provides reference and bibliography completion.



Syntax highlighting is separately provided by the language-latex package. The output can be automatically opened and synced within the editor through the pdf-view package, or in an external viewer.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • latextools + language-latex seems to be the best package combination to me as well. However I find atom quite unstable, crashing 2 to 3 times a day with data loss...

    – jan-glx
    Apr 9 '16 at 9:12











  • @YAK That is odd. I use the same two packages for LaTeX and Atom doesn't crash on me.

    – edwinksl
    Jun 21 '16 at 10:56






  • 1





    If you build your pdf with "Cmd + alt + b", how to you keep the builder from dumping all that *.log, *.aux, *.fls etc. files in your directory? I'd like to keep my *.tex files alone

    – alsdkjasdlkja
    Jun 26 '16 at 0:11











  • I have a Windows 10 x64 PC. I have Atom, latextools, languagelatex and pdf-view installed. When I try to build the PDF (pdfLaTeX), there's an error, stating, ! LaTeX Error: File memoir.cls' not found.` I've added the path to MikTex to TeXpath. I still get the error.

    – Ram Iyer
    Sep 12 '16 at 19:12






  • 2





    @nxrd Probably a late response, but others might be interested, latextools has this as an upcoming feature. In the meantime, you can delete your temp files with the keystroke cmd+L backspace.

    – Runar
    Oct 26 '16 at 19:23



















49















Texpad — texpad





  • Platforms: Mac (and iOS)


  • License: Commercial


  • Languages: English, German and Japanese


  • Unicode: Yes


  • % !TeX directives: Yes


  • Syntax Highlighting: Yes


  • Auto-typeset: OSX only


  • Code Completion: Yes, command completion and autofill


  • Code Folding: No


  • Spell Checking: Yes


  • SyncTeX: Yes


  • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, supports PDF


  • Project Management: Yes, included files opened automatically




enter image description here





Both




  • Document outline (navigatable table of sections, subsection, etc)

  • Auto-detection of typesetting chain (bibtex, makeindex, etc.)

  • Global search

  • Biber support


OSX




  • Custom typeset scripts

  • Snippets and code macros


iOS




  • Onboard typesetter with support for Virtual fonts, e-TeX and PGF (beamer/tikz).

  • Built in bundle manager


  • Typesetting API to provide typesetting services to other applications






share|improve this answer





















  • 10





    This should really be higher on the list.

    – lyxicon
    Dec 8 '13 at 7:05






  • 1





    @lyxicon - Yes, this app is awesome.

    – Kiyoshi
    Feb 8 '14 at 15:13






  • 1





    really love this one

    – Runar
    Dec 31 '15 at 5:15






  • 2





    This is the first app for Mac I ever purchased, and I never regretted it.

    – thiagoveloso
    Nov 27 '16 at 10:43






  • 6





    I downloaded the trial version and I did not even need 24 hours to purchase it! It's amazing and it has the best user interface ever. Updates are regular and developers always get back to you whenever you contact them. Recommended 120%.

    – Héctor
    Mar 26 '17 at 14:55



















44















gedit with the gedit-LaTeX-plugin



Available for: Windows, Mac, Linux and others

Open Source
Unicode: yes
RTL/bidi: yes





It has a clean interface and provides: Code Completion, Spell Checking, Syntax Checking and Validation, Outlines, Wizards, BibTeX Integration, Template Editing, User-Defined Snippets and a preconfigured comprehensive build system using rubber (including LaTeX → DVI with source specials for inverse search).



For my gedit LaTeX suite to be complete, I add two other plugins, first the 'Control your tabs' plugin to get Ctrl-(Shift)-Tab behavior, and also the AutoCompletion plugin which provides automatic suggestions for completion of any word, based on the words already present in the document - it can be a real time saver.





Temporary edit:
Currently the plugin is not ready for release with gedit 3. So, if you're running the latest Ubuntu (11.10) or like being cutting edge, you need to manually install the LaTeX-plugin. The easiest way is to download the version you want from here extract and install with the standard ./configure, make, sudo make install sequence. Read the INSTALL file in the archive for more details. You can also get the most recent version of the plugin from their git repository.



Note: If the ./configure script gives the error "No package ‘gtk+-3.0′ found" then, under Ubuntu, run sudo apt-get install libgtk-3-dev and then try the script again.






share|improve this answer


























  • Same here. It's actually quite good yet lightweight.

    – Vedran Miletić
    Jul 28 '10 at 11:51











  • I have tried various and keep coming back. Love it!

    – Frank_Zafka
    Jun 14 '11 at 7:45






  • 1





    Why is gedit so overrated about that ?

    – vdegenne
    Feb 27 '13 at 17:27











  • @Simon does this have code folding and tabs to manage multiple files?

    – AlanH
    May 5 '13 at 19:58











  • I personally find it the best editor out there for latex with heavily "bidi" texts. It needs a couple of tweaks and configurations but after a while it works perfectly.

    – Habib
    Sep 23 '18 at 8:09



















38














TextMate



Available for: Mac

Commercial (Not anymore since version 2.0)





With OS X I use TextMate with MacTeX. Now I don't want to change OS X for Linux only because I work with TextMate. It's powerful like vim and emacs. It's not free 45 euros. You can do all what you want and you can use and define snippets, macros, commands with shell programming or python or ruby. You can use it for mails or you can create HTML pages or you can programming with R, or Ruby. Perhaps to like this editor you need to learn a programming language like ruby or python (Perl and bash can be used). You can try it during one month for free.



Some screenshots:

Click image to enlarge

In this screenshot, you can see the bundles and in the LaTeX bundle you can see some commands and macros. You can define your personal bundle like my "latex author", you can work with the terminal from TextMate. You can find some movies on the net, to see how to work with TextMate.







EDIT: Since version 2.0, TextMate has gone open source, here it is the link to Github.






share|improve this answer


























  • How do you view your compiled source?

    – Alan Munn
    May 31 '11 at 22:56











  • Command R = Typset & View (the first item of the last screenshot) You have preferences to use pdflatex or latex, xetex etc. but you can create your personal script

    – Alain Matthes
    Jun 1 '11 at 4:45













  • Sorry, that wasn't really what I meant. You need some extra program to view the PDF, right? I was asking about how that works. (e.g. is there source/pdf synch?)

    – Alan Munn
    Jun 1 '11 at 10:39











  • @Alan Ok ! I use Skim it's possible to synchronize tex files and pdf. Some users use TexShop to view the pdfs. Sometimes I use Adobe Reader but I prefer Skim. It's possible to use TextMate, but this is very elementary.

    – Alain Matthes
    Jun 1 '11 at 10:58













  • The new version 2 is not commercial anymore.

    – Manuel
    Nov 21 '12 at 18:25



















36














KtikZ



Available for: Linux and Windows

Open Source





I am a big fan of the Linux editor Ktikz. By default Ktikz is meant to be a real-time editor for TikZ pictures. However, one can edit any type of environment just by editing the default template. Moreover, by creating a template consisting only of the text



<>


one can get real-time compilation of LaTeX documents.



I usually restrict my use of Ktikz to editing Beamer presentations or drawing TikZ pictures (or other projects where the visual output needs extra attention or tweaking). For other purposes the real-time compilation can be more of a distraction than it is worth.



For windows users: install QtikZ (also available in the link). Tested with windows 7 and miktex 2.9, and it works with no problem.






share|improve this answer


























  • I recently made a 150 pages document (class notes) entirely in LaTeX and TikZ. It was a great help for complicated drawings.

    – fabikw
    Nov 12 '10 at 19:20











  • This is great! I just used it on windows and it works perfectly!

    – Heidar
    Oct 15 '11 at 15:53











  • Recently, I updated my texlive2015 to the version Texlive2018. However,strange things happened. Qtikz worked perfectly with texlive2015,but it didn't work with texlive 2018. Though I add the correct path of pdflatex and pdftops, it still shows that ' could not load LaTeX logfile.' How can I solve this problem? Please

    – user450201
    Jun 10 '18 at 2:07



















32















Vim with vimtex — vim





  • Platforms: GNU/Linux, MS Windows, Mac, wherever you get Vim with clientserver and a TeX distribution with latexmk running


  • License: Vim License (Vim), MIT License (vimtex)


  • Unicode: Yes


  • RTL/bidi support: Partial


  • % !TEX directives: Only % !TEX root, however, Vim by itself supports many things such as modelines and buffer-local variables


  • Syntax highlighting: Yes, customizable via colorschemes; further support for the listings package, minted package, as well as some minor improvements on top of the built in Vim syntax plugin


  • Code completion: Yes; added completion of references and labels via omni-completion, auto-completion available with e.g. neocomplete and YouCompleteMe


  • Code folding: Yes (according to document's structure)


  • Spell checking: Yes (built into Vim)


  • SyncTeX: Yes (additional hacks for viewers which do not use SyncTeX available)


  • Built-in output viewer: No


  • Project management: vimtex supports multi-file documents, but does not provide a way to manage a project per se




I believe Vim needs no introduction. vimtex can be seen as a continuation of LaTeX-Box and is probably the best TeX plugin available for Vim at the moment of speaking. Compilation is handled very smoothly through latexmk. Most popular PDF viewers are supported (including some which by themselves cannot do forward searching).



See a list of features here or read the docs. Unlike LaTeX-Suite, vimtex is a more modern plugin and encourages a much less monolithic design. For example, it provides an omni-complete function for references and labels, but leaves it up to other, more specialized plugins, to automatically call this function.






share|improve this answer


























  • I think github.com/xuhdev/vim-latex-live-preview can be used as a built-in output viewer

    – Fabian Pijcke
    Mar 18 '17 at 9:09



















26














LEd



Available for: Windows

Freeware



Note: Development of LEd has stopped, and the last version is from 2009.





I can recommend LEd. It is Windows only and is just not working on some computers, still it is very functional; standard things like spelling, tree views, macros are present, while it has some more nice functions. I especially like a toolbar for beamer, but also noticeable is an option in search which can be used to highlight occurrences of a few queries at a time (regex supported of course).



enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 8





    I used LEd for a while and liked a lot of the features, but eventually I ran into too many bugs and moved to TeXnicCenter.

    – fryguybob
    Jul 27 '10 at 16:50






  • 1





    I wish it were supported (at least bug fixing, making it run on Windows7,...) properly. It is a great editor.

    – Skarab
    Jan 20 '12 at 9:57



















23














LaTeXila





  • Available for: Linux

  • Open source


  • Unicode support: Yes




LaTeXila is an Integrated LaTeX Environment for the GNOME desktop. It has a very nice and clean interface. Its available in Ubuntu software center. You can preview what you write, when ever you want.



It has some "magic" comments for making todonotes, which will show up in the structure panel on the left hand side. These are %TODO and %FIXME, in both cases followed by some text (if there is no text, it won't show in the panel).



enter image description here






share|improve this answer

































    23















    Latexian - Discontinued



    Available for: Mac

    Commercial - $9.99 on App Store





    Latexian was made by Taco Software, a company which has now closed. It was available Mac OS X 10.6 or higher (including Mavericks). Limited support is still being provided for those that previously purchased their software.



    This is a very lean editing environment at its core, with many features that can extend its capabilities. One very nice feature is an integrated execution environment that updates a live preview window in near-real time with edits. It is perfect for quick, simple projects.



    Click image to enlarge



    Features (copied from software site)



    OS X Lion & Mountain Lion Features



    For OS X Lion and Mountain Lion users, Latexian has support for Autosave, Resume, Versions, and Full Screen.



    Navigator



    Quickly navigate to chapters, sections, and included files using the Navigator. You can also add your own bookmarks to the Navigator by adding a comment to your document starting with the "!" character.



    Live Preview



    Live Preview allows you to see how your document typesets while you are editing. The PDF preview appears in a split pane and updates automatically.



    Code Completion



    Latexian includes Code Completion for LaTeX and BibTeX documents. When navigating the completion list, a brief description is shown for the selected item.



    Code Folding



    Code Folding allows you to collapse segments of text, making it easier to navigate through your text. Latexian identifies chapters and sections in your document and provides disclosure triangles to fold these in one click. Latexian will remember and restore your folds if you don't edit a document externally.



    Code Clips



    If you ever get tired of copying and pasting frequently used text segments, then Latexian's Code Clips will alleviate your problems. Code Clips allow you to store, manage, and access those text segments more easily. With Code Clips, you can assign keyboard shortcuts (Command + 0-9) to insert a clip into a document. You can also insert clips through Latexian's Code Completion panel.



    Spell Checking



    Latexian includes syntax-aware spell checking, including spell checking while you type. It ignores your LaTeX commands, and highlights errors in your text content.



    Code Coloring



    As you edit your document, Latexian colors your text to make it easier to read and navigate. Coloring is customizable, and Latexian supports coloring for LaTeX and BibTeX documents.



    Console



    Latexian includes an interactive console for presenting the output of the typesetter, and accepting input requested by the typesetter. Error messages are hyperlinked to the document location where the error occurred.



    Find & Batch Find



    Latexian includes advanced Find functionality for searching individual documents or entire projects. Support for regular expressions is included.






    share|improve this answer


























    • I really like their company name :)

      – vettipayyan
      Dec 24 '12 at 12:21






    • 3





      Unfortunately, it seems Taco Software closed shop some time in 2015.

      – talazem
      Jul 28 '15 at 23:42






    • 2





      Unfortunate. They made a nice product.

      – flip
      Jul 29 '15 at 14:18



















    21














    WinShell



    Available For: Windows

    FreeWare






    WinShell is a free multilingual integrated development environment (IDE) for LaTeX and TeX. The program includes a text editor, syntax highlighting, project management, spell checking, a table wizard, BibTeX support, Unicode support, different toolbars and user configuration options. It is not a LaTeX system; an additional LaTeX package is required.




    WinShell screenshot
    Click image to enlarge






    share|improve this answer





















    • 2





      Finally, someone mentioned it. I've tried almost all IDEs mentioned thus far, and only WinShell managed to stick, and is now my editor of choice. There are a few handy options that I miss, though (namely, including a fancy symbol from a menu if you've forgotten the name -- the way TexnicCenter does).

      – Martin Tapankov
      Aug 19 '10 at 5:47






    • 1





      What I found useful in winshell is that it is portable and has unicode support.

      – fabikw
      Nov 12 '10 at 16:46



















    19















    BaKoMa TeX Word — bakoma





    • platforms: Windows, OS X, Linux


    • License: commercial -- €55 or $101 per licence (other quantity discounts)


    • Languages: English


    • Unicode: Yes


    • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


    • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


    • Code Folding: No


    • Spell Checking: Yes


    • SyncTeX: ?


    • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes. Can view output in real time, and directly edit output file


    • Project Management: Yes




    I think BaKoMa is an innovative useful WYSIWYG editor. It allows users to edit both in the .tex file and in the output file. The real-time preview feature can come in handy when creating graphics and figures (e.g. using PSTricks or TikZ). In a review of BaKoMa, Martin Osborne made the following comment:




    If you find the output of int_0^infty hard to visualize, you'll definitely have trouble with the output of



    psline(25,25)(25,0)
    psline(0,0)(50,0)
    psset{origin={25,0},unit=25mm}
    psplot{-1}{1}{x dup mul}


    [BaKoMa] TeX Word makes it easy: you type the code and the output appears
    instantly. For me, TeX Word has cut the production time for figures by
    at least 75%.




    bakoma screenshot






    share|improve this answer


























    • @AlanH: I did include a link to their licensing page. Should I make it more explicit?

      – Herr K.
      May 5 '13 at 20:55






    • 1





      @Kevin Yeah, it might be nice to list how much it costs. It's quite substantial.

      – AlanH
      May 5 '13 at 20:57






    • 4





      There are three things I don't understand about BaKoMa. 1. Why isn't it more widely used? You edit the TeX code and instantly see the output, or just edit the output---saving a huge amount of time. How is it possible to create slides, for example, any other way? 2. Why isn't there an open source project to develop a similar system? 3. How can anyone complain about paying the price of dinner for two for a system that is so superior to the competition? The 200-odd people who think Emacs is a better system must be living in a different world than I am!

      – Martin J. Osborne
      Dec 31 '14 at 0:33








    • 2





      @Martin: I agree wholeheartedly. I guess people don't realize the value of incremental instantaneous live preview until they use it. And lots of people don't need to LaTeX figures.

      – Jamie Vicary
      May 7 '15 at 16:18











    • I've been devotedly using BaKoMa since 2007 and it amazes me that none of the other options appear to have even caught up to the version from 2007. I am about to upgrade to the 2015 version (university insists on having their own active license--won't complain too much) and it's nice to see many of the old quirks have been fixed. I agree the cost shouldn't be an issue for serious researchers: this is orders of magnitude better than the alternatives. It's just hard to get people to pay for something when a free option exists, even if they are so far behind.

      – Jack Huizenga
      Aug 25 '15 at 22:33



















    18















    Overleaf - Online LaTeX editor in your web browser.



    Note: The companies behind ShareLaTeX and Overleaf have merged, and as such the two services will at some point in the future be merged into one. See https://www.overleaf.com/blog/518-exciting-news-sharelatex-is-joining-overleaf#.Wa_pdL8hWV4.




    • Unlimited projects and collaborators for free

    • Rich Text View

    • git support

    • pdflatex compiler

    • Collaborate with others, see what they are typing in real time like Google documents

    • Auto Complete

    • Multi Language spell check

    • Export and import data

    • Sync with Dropbox

    • Regular snapshots allowing for rolling back

    • formally known as WriteLaTeX


    screenshot






    share|improve this answer


























    • What is the privacy of the documents, in free mode?

      – becko
      Apr 5 '16 at 17:38











    • Overleaf has the shortcoming that it doesn't use an up-to-date TeX distribution, but it has many templates and customer assistance is very good.

      – CarLaTeX
      Feb 18 '17 at 5:25











    • I wish they allowed working against Git repository (For instance, let's say I have GitHub repository and I want it to be the editor).

      – Royi
      Jun 8 '17 at 19:48



















    18















    Visual Studio Code with LaTeX-Workshop (on GitHub)



    other extensions are available





    • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Linux


    • License: open source (on GitHub), License MIT


    • Languages: de, en, fr, ...


    • Unicode: Yes


    • RTL/bidi: ...


    • % !TEX directives: Yes


    • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable (extensions)


    • Code Completion: Yes, customizable (extensions)


    • Code Folding: Yes


    • Spell Checking: Yes


    • SyncTeX: Yes


    • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes


    • Project Management: Yes


    • Autosave: Yes


    • Line Spacing: Yes


    vscode with LaTeX-Workshopnote: picture from LaTeX-Workshop description (link: animated gif)





    note: "I am not actively using this editor, but wanted to list it here. I was unsure about some points - please fill the gaps if you know whether these features are supported."






    share|improve this answer

































      16














      Inlage



      Available for: Windows

      Commercial





      Inlage is a great LaTeX IDE for Windows Vista/7. It has a lot of features that make it easy to handle LaTeX. The autocompletion has many commands with icons and descriptions and if you have a tablet pc you can use the Math Input Panel to translate a symbol or an equation to LaTeX.



      Main features:




      • Math Input Panel to LaTeX

      • Excel/Calc tables to LaTeX

      • autocompletion

      • spell checker

      • docking system

      • inverse/forward search (SumatraPDF)

      • code folding



      Click image to enlarge






      share|improve this answer


























      • Inlage looks great. It is commercial, but might be worth the money.

        – ipavlic
        Apr 30 '11 at 17:45






      • 1





        I found a inlage a few months ago via this thread and I'm very happy with it. I used it for several papers and now i'm writing my thesis with it.

        – kventil
        Aug 24 '11 at 10:22






      • 2





        unstable ... inlage 5 ... Personal opinion ... User since an year ... Had to switch to editor ...

        – abhilash sukumari
        May 7 '13 at 1:34






      • 1





        Inlage 4 is more stable than the newer one. Inlage 4 is for free now, Please download and try it ...

        – abhilash sukumari
        Nov 29 '13 at 8:34











      • It appears that Inlage 4 only works with MikTeX, and not with TeXLive, so it is not usable for me. Otherwise it would have looked quite nice.

        – hbaderts
        Aug 17 '15 at 6:51



















      15














      TeXnicle





      • Platforms: Mac


      • License: Free


      • Languages: English


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: No


      • % !TEX directives: No


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes (configurable)


      • Code Completion: Yes


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes


      • Project Management: Yes




      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer


























      • How do you solve the lack of support for Biber, if you do? I need some of its features, mainly Unicode.

        – Harold Cavendish
        Jan 3 '14 at 21:47











      • @HaroldCavendish: I don't have a Mac... consider asking in chat.

        – Werner
        Jan 3 '14 at 21:56











      • Thanks, it was worth it. Should anyone look for the same, all it takes is to go to Preferences –> Typesetting –> Engines, make a duplicate of the desired one (e.g. pdfLaTeX) and redefine the variable BIBTEX by replacing the path to BibTeX with the one pointing to Biber. Thanks to Joseph Wright's suggestion.

        – Harold Cavendish
        Jan 3 '14 at 22:37

















      1 2
      next


      protected by Kurt Jun 1 '16 at 1:04



      Thank you for your interest in this question.
      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














      54 Answers
      54






      active

      oldest

      votes








      54 Answers
      54






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      1 2
      next










      325















      Emacs with AUCTeX — emacs auctex





      • Platforms: Windows, Mac (incl. Aquamacs fork), Unix


      • License: Free software (GPL)


      • Languages: de, dk, fr, is, it, jp, nl, pl, se, sk are supported by AUCTeX language styles


      • Unicode: Yes, from Emacs 23, characters are represented using Unicode


      • RTL/bidirectional support: From Emacs 24, through bidi-mode


      • % !TeX directives: No, but has several realizations of file local variables


      • Syntax highlighting: Yes, customisable through customize and Elisp


      • Code completion: Yes


      • Code folding: Yes


      • Spell checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in output viewer: Yes


      • Project management: org-mode, reftex-mode, speedbar




      Emacs is one of the oldest programmable editors, which has basic support for TeX and friends. AUCTeX is a plugin to Emacs which provides a much more advanced support for editing LaTeX, ConTeXt, docTeX, Texinfo, and Plain TeX documents. It comes with a sophisticated auto-completion mechanism for environments and commands, supporting by default more than two hundreds LaTeX packages (but virtually any package can be automatically parsed in order to provide autocompletion for its commands and environments).



      Emacs with sample file loaded



      (In this screenshot, visual-line-mode is enabled. In this mode, lines that are wider than the window are broken between words. The line breaks are not added to the source file.)



      RefTeX is another plugin to Emacs, independent from and complementary to AUCTeX, which aids you with the management of bibliographic sources. It makes all your references as easy to find as a C-c <key>, for both BibTeX and biblatex, and also provides convenient shortcuts for navigating between sections in your document, bound by default to C-c =:



      Screenshot featuring RefTeX's outliner
      (Note that colour themes are completely customizable)



      AUCTeX supports multi-file parsing, so that huge documents with input or include commands are easily compiled with C-c C-c from any of their files. No more going back to the master file in order to compile.



      AUCTeX's preview-latex offers WYSIWYG previewing of formulae.



      Interesting features of Emacs:




      • Use table-insert along with table-generate-source and table-recognize-* functions to easily create a base for your tables.

      • Lots of useful keyboard shortcuts

      • Extensively documented, both in Emacs, via the Emacs and AUCTeX Texinfo manuals, and via many books in several languages.

      • Supports most of vim's features and keybindings through evil-mode.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 31





        You should mention how good reftex is.

        – Seamus
        Oct 3 '10 at 20:30






      • 9





        C-c C-s to create a section (with optional label), C-c C-e to create an environment of your choice (open and close tags)...

        – Seamus
        Nov 9 '10 at 15:57






      • 11





        You should try out orgtbl-mode, it's really awesome. Here's a good tutorial.

        – Oscar
        Nov 14 '10 at 15:49






      • 4





        Using Emacs (AUCTeX) as a TeX editor has another advantage, namely the ability to select rectangles (select by column rather than row) - which makes dealing with tables/tabular environments a bit easier. (The outline mode with AUCTeX is very useful too, for long documents, allowing one to "hide" or "fold" sections.) TeXWorks is not bad, especially as an out-of-the-box editor (Emacs always requires a bit more fiddling)

        – emacsomancer
        Dec 9 '10 at 5:17






      • 11





        C-u C-c C-e allows you to change the current environment (eg. from align to align*) C-c C-. marks the current environment. C-c C-* marks the current section. C-c C-m allows you to insert a macro (it has a large autocomplete list...)

        – Seamus
        Jun 1 '11 at 16:48
















      325















      Emacs with AUCTeX — emacs auctex





      • Platforms: Windows, Mac (incl. Aquamacs fork), Unix


      • License: Free software (GPL)


      • Languages: de, dk, fr, is, it, jp, nl, pl, se, sk are supported by AUCTeX language styles


      • Unicode: Yes, from Emacs 23, characters are represented using Unicode


      • RTL/bidirectional support: From Emacs 24, through bidi-mode


      • % !TeX directives: No, but has several realizations of file local variables


      • Syntax highlighting: Yes, customisable through customize and Elisp


      • Code completion: Yes


      • Code folding: Yes


      • Spell checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in output viewer: Yes


      • Project management: org-mode, reftex-mode, speedbar




      Emacs is one of the oldest programmable editors, which has basic support for TeX and friends. AUCTeX is a plugin to Emacs which provides a much more advanced support for editing LaTeX, ConTeXt, docTeX, Texinfo, and Plain TeX documents. It comes with a sophisticated auto-completion mechanism for environments and commands, supporting by default more than two hundreds LaTeX packages (but virtually any package can be automatically parsed in order to provide autocompletion for its commands and environments).



      Emacs with sample file loaded



      (In this screenshot, visual-line-mode is enabled. In this mode, lines that are wider than the window are broken between words. The line breaks are not added to the source file.)



      RefTeX is another plugin to Emacs, independent from and complementary to AUCTeX, which aids you with the management of bibliographic sources. It makes all your references as easy to find as a C-c <key>, for both BibTeX and biblatex, and also provides convenient shortcuts for navigating between sections in your document, bound by default to C-c =:



      Screenshot featuring RefTeX's outliner
      (Note that colour themes are completely customizable)



      AUCTeX supports multi-file parsing, so that huge documents with input or include commands are easily compiled with C-c C-c from any of their files. No more going back to the master file in order to compile.



      AUCTeX's preview-latex offers WYSIWYG previewing of formulae.



      Interesting features of Emacs:




      • Use table-insert along with table-generate-source and table-recognize-* functions to easily create a base for your tables.

      • Lots of useful keyboard shortcuts

      • Extensively documented, both in Emacs, via the Emacs and AUCTeX Texinfo manuals, and via many books in several languages.

      • Supports most of vim's features and keybindings through evil-mode.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 31





        You should mention how good reftex is.

        – Seamus
        Oct 3 '10 at 20:30






      • 9





        C-c C-s to create a section (with optional label), C-c C-e to create an environment of your choice (open and close tags)...

        – Seamus
        Nov 9 '10 at 15:57






      • 11





        You should try out orgtbl-mode, it's really awesome. Here's a good tutorial.

        – Oscar
        Nov 14 '10 at 15:49






      • 4





        Using Emacs (AUCTeX) as a TeX editor has another advantage, namely the ability to select rectangles (select by column rather than row) - which makes dealing with tables/tabular environments a bit easier. (The outline mode with AUCTeX is very useful too, for long documents, allowing one to "hide" or "fold" sections.) TeXWorks is not bad, especially as an out-of-the-box editor (Emacs always requires a bit more fiddling)

        – emacsomancer
        Dec 9 '10 at 5:17






      • 11





        C-u C-c C-e allows you to change the current environment (eg. from align to align*) C-c C-. marks the current environment. C-c C-* marks the current section. C-c C-m allows you to insert a macro (it has a large autocomplete list...)

        – Seamus
        Jun 1 '11 at 16:48














      325












      325








      325








      Emacs with AUCTeX — emacs auctex





      • Platforms: Windows, Mac (incl. Aquamacs fork), Unix


      • License: Free software (GPL)


      • Languages: de, dk, fr, is, it, jp, nl, pl, se, sk are supported by AUCTeX language styles


      • Unicode: Yes, from Emacs 23, characters are represented using Unicode


      • RTL/bidirectional support: From Emacs 24, through bidi-mode


      • % !TeX directives: No, but has several realizations of file local variables


      • Syntax highlighting: Yes, customisable through customize and Elisp


      • Code completion: Yes


      • Code folding: Yes


      • Spell checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in output viewer: Yes


      • Project management: org-mode, reftex-mode, speedbar




      Emacs is one of the oldest programmable editors, which has basic support for TeX and friends. AUCTeX is a plugin to Emacs which provides a much more advanced support for editing LaTeX, ConTeXt, docTeX, Texinfo, and Plain TeX documents. It comes with a sophisticated auto-completion mechanism for environments and commands, supporting by default more than two hundreds LaTeX packages (but virtually any package can be automatically parsed in order to provide autocompletion for its commands and environments).



      Emacs with sample file loaded



      (In this screenshot, visual-line-mode is enabled. In this mode, lines that are wider than the window are broken between words. The line breaks are not added to the source file.)



      RefTeX is another plugin to Emacs, independent from and complementary to AUCTeX, which aids you with the management of bibliographic sources. It makes all your references as easy to find as a C-c <key>, for both BibTeX and biblatex, and also provides convenient shortcuts for navigating between sections in your document, bound by default to C-c =:



      Screenshot featuring RefTeX's outliner
      (Note that colour themes are completely customizable)



      AUCTeX supports multi-file parsing, so that huge documents with input or include commands are easily compiled with C-c C-c from any of their files. No more going back to the master file in order to compile.



      AUCTeX's preview-latex offers WYSIWYG previewing of formulae.



      Interesting features of Emacs:




      • Use table-insert along with table-generate-source and table-recognize-* functions to easily create a base for your tables.

      • Lots of useful keyboard shortcuts

      • Extensively documented, both in Emacs, via the Emacs and AUCTeX Texinfo manuals, and via many books in several languages.

      • Supports most of vim's features and keybindings through evil-mode.






      share|improve this answer
















      Emacs with AUCTeX — emacs auctex





      • Platforms: Windows, Mac (incl. Aquamacs fork), Unix


      • License: Free software (GPL)


      • Languages: de, dk, fr, is, it, jp, nl, pl, se, sk are supported by AUCTeX language styles


      • Unicode: Yes, from Emacs 23, characters are represented using Unicode


      • RTL/bidirectional support: From Emacs 24, through bidi-mode


      • % !TeX directives: No, but has several realizations of file local variables


      • Syntax highlighting: Yes, customisable through customize and Elisp


      • Code completion: Yes


      • Code folding: Yes


      • Spell checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in output viewer: Yes


      • Project management: org-mode, reftex-mode, speedbar




      Emacs is one of the oldest programmable editors, which has basic support for TeX and friends. AUCTeX is a plugin to Emacs which provides a much more advanced support for editing LaTeX, ConTeXt, docTeX, Texinfo, and Plain TeX documents. It comes with a sophisticated auto-completion mechanism for environments and commands, supporting by default more than two hundreds LaTeX packages (but virtually any package can be automatically parsed in order to provide autocompletion for its commands and environments).



      Emacs with sample file loaded



      (In this screenshot, visual-line-mode is enabled. In this mode, lines that are wider than the window are broken between words. The line breaks are not added to the source file.)



      RefTeX is another plugin to Emacs, independent from and complementary to AUCTeX, which aids you with the management of bibliographic sources. It makes all your references as easy to find as a C-c <key>, for both BibTeX and biblatex, and also provides convenient shortcuts for navigating between sections in your document, bound by default to C-c =:



      Screenshot featuring RefTeX's outliner
      (Note that colour themes are completely customizable)



      AUCTeX supports multi-file parsing, so that huge documents with input or include commands are easily compiled with C-c C-c from any of their files. No more going back to the master file in order to compile.



      AUCTeX's preview-latex offers WYSIWYG previewing of formulae.



      Interesting features of Emacs:




      • Use table-insert along with table-generate-source and table-recognize-* functions to easily create a base for your tables.

      • Lots of useful keyboard shortcuts

      • Extensively documented, both in Emacs, via the Emacs and AUCTeX Texinfo manuals, and via many books in several languages.

      • Supports most of vim's features and keybindings through evil-mode.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36


























      community wiki





      19 revs, 10 users 19%
      YuppieNetworking









      • 31





        You should mention how good reftex is.

        – Seamus
        Oct 3 '10 at 20:30






      • 9





        C-c C-s to create a section (with optional label), C-c C-e to create an environment of your choice (open and close tags)...

        – Seamus
        Nov 9 '10 at 15:57






      • 11





        You should try out orgtbl-mode, it's really awesome. Here's a good tutorial.

        – Oscar
        Nov 14 '10 at 15:49






      • 4





        Using Emacs (AUCTeX) as a TeX editor has another advantage, namely the ability to select rectangles (select by column rather than row) - which makes dealing with tables/tabular environments a bit easier. (The outline mode with AUCTeX is very useful too, for long documents, allowing one to "hide" or "fold" sections.) TeXWorks is not bad, especially as an out-of-the-box editor (Emacs always requires a bit more fiddling)

        – emacsomancer
        Dec 9 '10 at 5:17






      • 11





        C-u C-c C-e allows you to change the current environment (eg. from align to align*) C-c C-. marks the current environment. C-c C-* marks the current section. C-c C-m allows you to insert a macro (it has a large autocomplete list...)

        – Seamus
        Jun 1 '11 at 16:48














      • 31





        You should mention how good reftex is.

        – Seamus
        Oct 3 '10 at 20:30






      • 9





        C-c C-s to create a section (with optional label), C-c C-e to create an environment of your choice (open and close tags)...

        – Seamus
        Nov 9 '10 at 15:57






      • 11





        You should try out orgtbl-mode, it's really awesome. Here's a good tutorial.

        – Oscar
        Nov 14 '10 at 15:49






      • 4





        Using Emacs (AUCTeX) as a TeX editor has another advantage, namely the ability to select rectangles (select by column rather than row) - which makes dealing with tables/tabular environments a bit easier. (The outline mode with AUCTeX is very useful too, for long documents, allowing one to "hide" or "fold" sections.) TeXWorks is not bad, especially as an out-of-the-box editor (Emacs always requires a bit more fiddling)

        – emacsomancer
        Dec 9 '10 at 5:17






      • 11





        C-u C-c C-e allows you to change the current environment (eg. from align to align*) C-c C-. marks the current environment. C-c C-* marks the current section. C-c C-m allows you to insert a macro (it has a large autocomplete list...)

        – Seamus
        Jun 1 '11 at 16:48








      31




      31





      You should mention how good reftex is.

      – Seamus
      Oct 3 '10 at 20:30





      You should mention how good reftex is.

      – Seamus
      Oct 3 '10 at 20:30




      9




      9





      C-c C-s to create a section (with optional label), C-c C-e to create an environment of your choice (open and close tags)...

      – Seamus
      Nov 9 '10 at 15:57





      C-c C-s to create a section (with optional label), C-c C-e to create an environment of your choice (open and close tags)...

      – Seamus
      Nov 9 '10 at 15:57




      11




      11





      You should try out orgtbl-mode, it's really awesome. Here's a good tutorial.

      – Oscar
      Nov 14 '10 at 15:49





      You should try out orgtbl-mode, it's really awesome. Here's a good tutorial.

      – Oscar
      Nov 14 '10 at 15:49




      4




      4





      Using Emacs (AUCTeX) as a TeX editor has another advantage, namely the ability to select rectangles (select by column rather than row) - which makes dealing with tables/tabular environments a bit easier. (The outline mode with AUCTeX is very useful too, for long documents, allowing one to "hide" or "fold" sections.) TeXWorks is not bad, especially as an out-of-the-box editor (Emacs always requires a bit more fiddling)

      – emacsomancer
      Dec 9 '10 at 5:17





      Using Emacs (AUCTeX) as a TeX editor has another advantage, namely the ability to select rectangles (select by column rather than row) - which makes dealing with tables/tabular environments a bit easier. (The outline mode with AUCTeX is very useful too, for long documents, allowing one to "hide" or "fold" sections.) TeXWorks is not bad, especially as an out-of-the-box editor (Emacs always requires a bit more fiddling)

      – emacsomancer
      Dec 9 '10 at 5:17




      11




      11





      C-u C-c C-e allows you to change the current environment (eg. from align to align*) C-c C-. marks the current environment. C-c C-* marks the current section. C-c C-m allows you to insert a macro (it has a large autocomplete list...)

      – Seamus
      Jun 1 '11 at 16:48





      C-u C-c C-e allows you to change the current environment (eg. from align to align*) C-c C-. marks the current environment. C-c C-* marks the current section. C-c C-m allows you to insert a macro (it has a large autocomplete list...)

      – Seamus
      Jun 1 '11 at 16:48











      296















      TeXstudio — texstudio



      (formerly TexMakerX)





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8/10, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD


      • License: GPL v2


      • Languages: cs, de, en, es, fr, hu, ja, pl, pt_BR, ru, vi, zh_CN


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: experimental


      • % !TeX directives: Yes


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable and auto-customized


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes, including grammar checking based on LanguageTool.


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, supports PDF


      • Project Management: Yes




      I'd recommend TeXstudio an interesting fork of Texmaker that I find more usable and customizable.



      Here is a screen shot of TeXStudio.



      TeXstudio sample document screen shot



      Other pros:




      • cross-platform,

      • writing support (incr. search, folding, navigation, auto-completion, custom macros)

      • inline interactive spell-checking

      • support to the main latex tools, including tikz, pstricks, etc.

      • multi-views: math, structure

      • svn support

      • runs in a usb

      • pdf viewer included, but can be configured to use external viewers (also with synctex)

      • live-updating inline preview for formulas and code segments

      • tools for easy table editing and table-code formatting

      • multiple cursors

      • smart BibTeX auto-complete (including multiple, comma-separated citations) and hovering on cite text shows a preview of the BibTeX entry

      • document templates

      • very active and responsive developer and community

      • adjustable icon size makes it suitable for high resolution displays (preferences->show advanced options->gui scaling)


      Cons:




      • Does not support split editor






      share|improve this answer





















      • 6





        Is there some place listing the differences between Texmaker and TeXstudio?

        – DevSolar
        Sep 13 '11 at 7:31






      • 11





        TeXStudio isn't Texmaker with additional features. It was forked years ago and there are more differences now as there were in the beginning. I tried both and somehow prefer Texmaker, it just feels cleaner to me.

        – doblak
        Nov 26 '11 at 17:35






      • 12





        TexStudio, is recommended by MikTex distribution in their manual as an advanced choice editor, after spending some time toying with TexWorks (the basic choice if you are a total beginner). I couldn't stay long with TexWorks, while TexStudio is there inviting with its many features. For spell checking and language, there is some nice plugin with great potential called language tool.

        – doctorate
        May 25 '13 at 16:12








      • 20





        After using TexMaker for a year I switched to TexStudio. It has much more features, but the selling point was the much better support of custom shortcuts. It's also blazingly fast on my low-end laptop, compared to TexMaker.

        – Dwelle
        Jun 11 '13 at 12:17






      • 9





        I switched from TexMaker to TexStudio quite some time ago and haven't looked back.

        – Nicholas Hamilton
        Feb 4 '14 at 10:06


















      296















      TeXstudio — texstudio



      (formerly TexMakerX)





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8/10, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD


      • License: GPL v2


      • Languages: cs, de, en, es, fr, hu, ja, pl, pt_BR, ru, vi, zh_CN


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: experimental


      • % !TeX directives: Yes


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable and auto-customized


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes, including grammar checking based on LanguageTool.


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, supports PDF


      • Project Management: Yes




      I'd recommend TeXstudio an interesting fork of Texmaker that I find more usable and customizable.



      Here is a screen shot of TeXStudio.



      TeXstudio sample document screen shot



      Other pros:




      • cross-platform,

      • writing support (incr. search, folding, navigation, auto-completion, custom macros)

      • inline interactive spell-checking

      • support to the main latex tools, including tikz, pstricks, etc.

      • multi-views: math, structure

      • svn support

      • runs in a usb

      • pdf viewer included, but can be configured to use external viewers (also with synctex)

      • live-updating inline preview for formulas and code segments

      • tools for easy table editing and table-code formatting

      • multiple cursors

      • smart BibTeX auto-complete (including multiple, comma-separated citations) and hovering on cite text shows a preview of the BibTeX entry

      • document templates

      • very active and responsive developer and community

      • adjustable icon size makes it suitable for high resolution displays (preferences->show advanced options->gui scaling)


      Cons:




      • Does not support split editor






      share|improve this answer





















      • 6





        Is there some place listing the differences between Texmaker and TeXstudio?

        – DevSolar
        Sep 13 '11 at 7:31






      • 11





        TeXStudio isn't Texmaker with additional features. It was forked years ago and there are more differences now as there were in the beginning. I tried both and somehow prefer Texmaker, it just feels cleaner to me.

        – doblak
        Nov 26 '11 at 17:35






      • 12





        TexStudio, is recommended by MikTex distribution in their manual as an advanced choice editor, after spending some time toying with TexWorks (the basic choice if you are a total beginner). I couldn't stay long with TexWorks, while TexStudio is there inviting with its many features. For spell checking and language, there is some nice plugin with great potential called language tool.

        – doctorate
        May 25 '13 at 16:12








      • 20





        After using TexMaker for a year I switched to TexStudio. It has much more features, but the selling point was the much better support of custom shortcuts. It's also blazingly fast on my low-end laptop, compared to TexMaker.

        – Dwelle
        Jun 11 '13 at 12:17






      • 9





        I switched from TexMaker to TexStudio quite some time ago and haven't looked back.

        – Nicholas Hamilton
        Feb 4 '14 at 10:06
















      296












      296








      296








      TeXstudio — texstudio



      (formerly TexMakerX)





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8/10, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD


      • License: GPL v2


      • Languages: cs, de, en, es, fr, hu, ja, pl, pt_BR, ru, vi, zh_CN


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: experimental


      • % !TeX directives: Yes


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable and auto-customized


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes, including grammar checking based on LanguageTool.


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, supports PDF


      • Project Management: Yes




      I'd recommend TeXstudio an interesting fork of Texmaker that I find more usable and customizable.



      Here is a screen shot of TeXStudio.



      TeXstudio sample document screen shot



      Other pros:




      • cross-platform,

      • writing support (incr. search, folding, navigation, auto-completion, custom macros)

      • inline interactive spell-checking

      • support to the main latex tools, including tikz, pstricks, etc.

      • multi-views: math, structure

      • svn support

      • runs in a usb

      • pdf viewer included, but can be configured to use external viewers (also with synctex)

      • live-updating inline preview for formulas and code segments

      • tools for easy table editing and table-code formatting

      • multiple cursors

      • smart BibTeX auto-complete (including multiple, comma-separated citations) and hovering on cite text shows a preview of the BibTeX entry

      • document templates

      • very active and responsive developer and community

      • adjustable icon size makes it suitable for high resolution displays (preferences->show advanced options->gui scaling)


      Cons:




      • Does not support split editor






      share|improve this answer
















      TeXstudio — texstudio



      (formerly TexMakerX)





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8/10, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD


      • License: GPL v2


      • Languages: cs, de, en, es, fr, hu, ja, pl, pt_BR, ru, vi, zh_CN


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: experimental


      • % !TeX directives: Yes


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable and auto-customized


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes, including grammar checking based on LanguageTool.


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, supports PDF


      • Project Management: Yes




      I'd recommend TeXstudio an interesting fork of Texmaker that I find more usable and customizable.



      Here is a screen shot of TeXStudio.



      TeXstudio sample document screen shot



      Other pros:




      • cross-platform,

      • writing support (incr. search, folding, navigation, auto-completion, custom macros)

      • inline interactive spell-checking

      • support to the main latex tools, including tikz, pstricks, etc.

      • multi-views: math, structure

      • svn support

      • runs in a usb

      • pdf viewer included, but can be configured to use external viewers (also with synctex)

      • live-updating inline preview for formulas and code segments

      • tools for easy table editing and table-code formatting

      • multiple cursors

      • smart BibTeX auto-complete (including multiple, comma-separated citations) and hovering on cite text shows a preview of the BibTeX entry

      • document templates

      • very active and responsive developer and community

      • adjustable icon size makes it suitable for high resolution displays (preferences->show advanced options->gui scaling)


      Cons:




      • Does not support split editor







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Jan 19 '18 at 13:14


























      community wiki





      19 revs, 12 users 30%
      Nico









      • 6





        Is there some place listing the differences between Texmaker and TeXstudio?

        – DevSolar
        Sep 13 '11 at 7:31






      • 11





        TeXStudio isn't Texmaker with additional features. It was forked years ago and there are more differences now as there were in the beginning. I tried both and somehow prefer Texmaker, it just feels cleaner to me.

        – doblak
        Nov 26 '11 at 17:35






      • 12





        TexStudio, is recommended by MikTex distribution in their manual as an advanced choice editor, after spending some time toying with TexWorks (the basic choice if you are a total beginner). I couldn't stay long with TexWorks, while TexStudio is there inviting with its many features. For spell checking and language, there is some nice plugin with great potential called language tool.

        – doctorate
        May 25 '13 at 16:12








      • 20





        After using TexMaker for a year I switched to TexStudio. It has much more features, but the selling point was the much better support of custom shortcuts. It's also blazingly fast on my low-end laptop, compared to TexMaker.

        – Dwelle
        Jun 11 '13 at 12:17






      • 9





        I switched from TexMaker to TexStudio quite some time ago and haven't looked back.

        – Nicholas Hamilton
        Feb 4 '14 at 10:06
















      • 6





        Is there some place listing the differences between Texmaker and TeXstudio?

        – DevSolar
        Sep 13 '11 at 7:31






      • 11





        TeXStudio isn't Texmaker with additional features. It was forked years ago and there are more differences now as there were in the beginning. I tried both and somehow prefer Texmaker, it just feels cleaner to me.

        – doblak
        Nov 26 '11 at 17:35






      • 12





        TexStudio, is recommended by MikTex distribution in their manual as an advanced choice editor, after spending some time toying with TexWorks (the basic choice if you are a total beginner). I couldn't stay long with TexWorks, while TexStudio is there inviting with its many features. For spell checking and language, there is some nice plugin with great potential called language tool.

        – doctorate
        May 25 '13 at 16:12








      • 20





        After using TexMaker for a year I switched to TexStudio. It has much more features, but the selling point was the much better support of custom shortcuts. It's also blazingly fast on my low-end laptop, compared to TexMaker.

        – Dwelle
        Jun 11 '13 at 12:17






      • 9





        I switched from TexMaker to TexStudio quite some time ago and haven't looked back.

        – Nicholas Hamilton
        Feb 4 '14 at 10:06










      6




      6





      Is there some place listing the differences between Texmaker and TeXstudio?

      – DevSolar
      Sep 13 '11 at 7:31





      Is there some place listing the differences between Texmaker and TeXstudio?

      – DevSolar
      Sep 13 '11 at 7:31




      11




      11





      TeXStudio isn't Texmaker with additional features. It was forked years ago and there are more differences now as there were in the beginning. I tried both and somehow prefer Texmaker, it just feels cleaner to me.

      – doblak
      Nov 26 '11 at 17:35





      TeXStudio isn't Texmaker with additional features. It was forked years ago and there are more differences now as there were in the beginning. I tried both and somehow prefer Texmaker, it just feels cleaner to me.

      – doblak
      Nov 26 '11 at 17:35




      12




      12





      TexStudio, is recommended by MikTex distribution in their manual as an advanced choice editor, after spending some time toying with TexWorks (the basic choice if you are a total beginner). I couldn't stay long with TexWorks, while TexStudio is there inviting with its many features. For spell checking and language, there is some nice plugin with great potential called language tool.

      – doctorate
      May 25 '13 at 16:12







      TexStudio, is recommended by MikTex distribution in their manual as an advanced choice editor, after spending some time toying with TexWorks (the basic choice if you are a total beginner). I couldn't stay long with TexWorks, while TexStudio is there inviting with its many features. For spell checking and language, there is some nice plugin with great potential called language tool.

      – doctorate
      May 25 '13 at 16:12






      20




      20





      After using TexMaker for a year I switched to TexStudio. It has much more features, but the selling point was the much better support of custom shortcuts. It's also blazingly fast on my low-end laptop, compared to TexMaker.

      – Dwelle
      Jun 11 '13 at 12:17





      After using TexMaker for a year I switched to TexStudio. It has much more features, but the selling point was the much better support of custom shortcuts. It's also blazingly fast on my low-end laptop, compared to TexMaker.

      – Dwelle
      Jun 11 '13 at 12:17




      9




      9





      I switched from TexMaker to TexStudio quite some time ago and haven't looked back.

      – Nicholas Hamilton
      Feb 4 '14 at 10:06







      I switched from TexMaker to TexStudio quite some time ago and haven't looked back.

      – Nicholas Hamilton
      Feb 4 '14 at 10:06













      285















      Vim with LaTeX-suite — vim latex-suite





      • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Linux and others


      • License: Open Source Charityware


      • Languages: ?


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi support: partially


      • % !TEX directives: No, but has modelines


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


      • Code Completion: Yes (using Omni Completion, extendable with SnipMate plugin)


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes, see e.g. this question


      • Built-in Output Viewer: No


      • Project Management: ?




      If you're really hardcore, you can always use Vim. There's a suite of macros and whatnot appropriate for Vim which can be used to edit LaTeX files.



      Vim sample document screen shot



      You can have word/command completion via <C-P> and <C-N>, to go the previous and next matches, respectively.



      There is a version of Vim with graphical menus, called gVim. If it is used with LaTeX-suite, then various TeX commands are displayed in the menu bar for quick insertion in the text. (For Mac, there is a native build called MacVim.)



      Features



      Vim also allows for code folding, the package vim-latex offers automatic code folding. Folding can also be done manually based on a key (e.g., {{{ and }}}) to open and close automatic folds. Example of folds can be seen as follows:



      vim code folds



      As per original question, some other useful features not listed elsewhere in this post include



      VIM




      • Regular Expressions

      • Powerful keyboard short-cuts/commands

      • Extremely customizable

      • Smart Indenting


      LaTeX-Suite




      • Calling the compiler is quick with ll; viewing the result is lv

      • Environments accessible with three letter sequences in insert mode:



        • EEQ = equation environment


        • EFI = figure environment



      • Place-holders (<+text+>) can be jumped to with Ctrl-J without leaving insert mode

      • Inverse searching: Double click in (supported) pdf viewer and you jump to corresponding tex source line


      For issues, pull request and installation from github see here.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 13





        I definitely second the Vim recommendation. For instance, it's very easy to define all kinds of keyboard shortcuts (e.g. for me 5prop turns into begin{proposition} end{proposition}) that make typing very easy.

        – Akhil Mathew
        Jul 31 '10 at 0:17






      • 3





        And even if you don't want to use the vim-latex macros, you can define silly short cuts like I do: dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~ww278/#texres

        – Willie Wong
        Aug 3 '10 at 16:20






      • 2





        vim (with plugins) and a Makefile.

        – Johan
        Aug 15 '10 at 9:40






      • 3





        There is always gVim for those of you who don't like the command line. and the vim-latex plugin is very helpful for completion of commands.

        – Dom
        Feb 17 '11 at 16:29






      • 4





        @AymanElmasry: It's not the fault of vim-latex, it's the fault of your distribution's package stating its dependency on texlive-2007. You could either tell your package manager to ignore dependencies for the package, install a "dummy" package, or install the plugin manually instead of going through the package manager.

        – DevSolar
        Jun 20 '12 at 7:48
















      285















      Vim with LaTeX-suite — vim latex-suite





      • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Linux and others


      • License: Open Source Charityware


      • Languages: ?


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi support: partially


      • % !TEX directives: No, but has modelines


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


      • Code Completion: Yes (using Omni Completion, extendable with SnipMate plugin)


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes, see e.g. this question


      • Built-in Output Viewer: No


      • Project Management: ?




      If you're really hardcore, you can always use Vim. There's a suite of macros and whatnot appropriate for Vim which can be used to edit LaTeX files.



      Vim sample document screen shot



      You can have word/command completion via <C-P> and <C-N>, to go the previous and next matches, respectively.



      There is a version of Vim with graphical menus, called gVim. If it is used with LaTeX-suite, then various TeX commands are displayed in the menu bar for quick insertion in the text. (For Mac, there is a native build called MacVim.)



      Features



      Vim also allows for code folding, the package vim-latex offers automatic code folding. Folding can also be done manually based on a key (e.g., {{{ and }}}) to open and close automatic folds. Example of folds can be seen as follows:



      vim code folds



      As per original question, some other useful features not listed elsewhere in this post include



      VIM




      • Regular Expressions

      • Powerful keyboard short-cuts/commands

      • Extremely customizable

      • Smart Indenting


      LaTeX-Suite




      • Calling the compiler is quick with ll; viewing the result is lv

      • Environments accessible with three letter sequences in insert mode:



        • EEQ = equation environment


        • EFI = figure environment



      • Place-holders (<+text+>) can be jumped to with Ctrl-J without leaving insert mode

      • Inverse searching: Double click in (supported) pdf viewer and you jump to corresponding tex source line


      For issues, pull request and installation from github see here.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 13





        I definitely second the Vim recommendation. For instance, it's very easy to define all kinds of keyboard shortcuts (e.g. for me 5prop turns into begin{proposition} end{proposition}) that make typing very easy.

        – Akhil Mathew
        Jul 31 '10 at 0:17






      • 3





        And even if you don't want to use the vim-latex macros, you can define silly short cuts like I do: dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~ww278/#texres

        – Willie Wong
        Aug 3 '10 at 16:20






      • 2





        vim (with plugins) and a Makefile.

        – Johan
        Aug 15 '10 at 9:40






      • 3





        There is always gVim for those of you who don't like the command line. and the vim-latex plugin is very helpful for completion of commands.

        – Dom
        Feb 17 '11 at 16:29






      • 4





        @AymanElmasry: It's not the fault of vim-latex, it's the fault of your distribution's package stating its dependency on texlive-2007. You could either tell your package manager to ignore dependencies for the package, install a "dummy" package, or install the plugin manually instead of going through the package manager.

        – DevSolar
        Jun 20 '12 at 7:48














      285












      285








      285








      Vim with LaTeX-suite — vim latex-suite





      • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Linux and others


      • License: Open Source Charityware


      • Languages: ?


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi support: partially


      • % !TEX directives: No, but has modelines


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


      • Code Completion: Yes (using Omni Completion, extendable with SnipMate plugin)


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes, see e.g. this question


      • Built-in Output Viewer: No


      • Project Management: ?




      If you're really hardcore, you can always use Vim. There's a suite of macros and whatnot appropriate for Vim which can be used to edit LaTeX files.



      Vim sample document screen shot



      You can have word/command completion via <C-P> and <C-N>, to go the previous and next matches, respectively.



      There is a version of Vim with graphical menus, called gVim. If it is used with LaTeX-suite, then various TeX commands are displayed in the menu bar for quick insertion in the text. (For Mac, there is a native build called MacVim.)



      Features



      Vim also allows for code folding, the package vim-latex offers automatic code folding. Folding can also be done manually based on a key (e.g., {{{ and }}}) to open and close automatic folds. Example of folds can be seen as follows:



      vim code folds



      As per original question, some other useful features not listed elsewhere in this post include



      VIM




      • Regular Expressions

      • Powerful keyboard short-cuts/commands

      • Extremely customizable

      • Smart Indenting


      LaTeX-Suite




      • Calling the compiler is quick with ll; viewing the result is lv

      • Environments accessible with three letter sequences in insert mode:



        • EEQ = equation environment


        • EFI = figure environment



      • Place-holders (<+text+>) can be jumped to with Ctrl-J without leaving insert mode

      • Inverse searching: Double click in (supported) pdf viewer and you jump to corresponding tex source line


      For issues, pull request and installation from github see here.






      share|improve this answer
















      Vim with LaTeX-suite — vim latex-suite





      • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Linux and others


      • License: Open Source Charityware


      • Languages: ?


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi support: partially


      • % !TEX directives: No, but has modelines


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


      • Code Completion: Yes (using Omni Completion, extendable with SnipMate plugin)


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes, see e.g. this question


      • Built-in Output Viewer: No


      • Project Management: ?




      If you're really hardcore, you can always use Vim. There's a suite of macros and whatnot appropriate for Vim which can be used to edit LaTeX files.



      Vim sample document screen shot



      You can have word/command completion via <C-P> and <C-N>, to go the previous and next matches, respectively.



      There is a version of Vim with graphical menus, called gVim. If it is used with LaTeX-suite, then various TeX commands are displayed in the menu bar for quick insertion in the text. (For Mac, there is a native build called MacVim.)



      Features



      Vim also allows for code folding, the package vim-latex offers automatic code folding. Folding can also be done manually based on a key (e.g., {{{ and }}}) to open and close automatic folds. Example of folds can be seen as follows:



      vim code folds



      As per original question, some other useful features not listed elsewhere in this post include



      VIM




      • Regular Expressions

      • Powerful keyboard short-cuts/commands

      • Extremely customizable

      • Smart Indenting


      LaTeX-Suite




      • Calling the compiler is quick with ll; viewing the result is lv

      • Environments accessible with three letter sequences in insert mode:



        • EEQ = equation environment


        • EFI = figure environment



      • Place-holders (<+text+>) can be jumped to with Ctrl-J without leaving insert mode

      • Inverse searching: Double click in (supported) pdf viewer and you jump to corresponding tex source line


      For issues, pull request and installation from github see here.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36


























      community wiki





      15 revs, 8 users 24%
      EricR









      • 13





        I definitely second the Vim recommendation. For instance, it's very easy to define all kinds of keyboard shortcuts (e.g. for me 5prop turns into begin{proposition} end{proposition}) that make typing very easy.

        – Akhil Mathew
        Jul 31 '10 at 0:17






      • 3





        And even if you don't want to use the vim-latex macros, you can define silly short cuts like I do: dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~ww278/#texres

        – Willie Wong
        Aug 3 '10 at 16:20






      • 2





        vim (with plugins) and a Makefile.

        – Johan
        Aug 15 '10 at 9:40






      • 3





        There is always gVim for those of you who don't like the command line. and the vim-latex plugin is very helpful for completion of commands.

        – Dom
        Feb 17 '11 at 16:29






      • 4





        @AymanElmasry: It's not the fault of vim-latex, it's the fault of your distribution's package stating its dependency on texlive-2007. You could either tell your package manager to ignore dependencies for the package, install a "dummy" package, or install the plugin manually instead of going through the package manager.

        – DevSolar
        Jun 20 '12 at 7:48














      • 13





        I definitely second the Vim recommendation. For instance, it's very easy to define all kinds of keyboard shortcuts (e.g. for me 5prop turns into begin{proposition} end{proposition}) that make typing very easy.

        – Akhil Mathew
        Jul 31 '10 at 0:17






      • 3





        And even if you don't want to use the vim-latex macros, you can define silly short cuts like I do: dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~ww278/#texres

        – Willie Wong
        Aug 3 '10 at 16:20






      • 2





        vim (with plugins) and a Makefile.

        – Johan
        Aug 15 '10 at 9:40






      • 3





        There is always gVim for those of you who don't like the command line. and the vim-latex plugin is very helpful for completion of commands.

        – Dom
        Feb 17 '11 at 16:29






      • 4





        @AymanElmasry: It's not the fault of vim-latex, it's the fault of your distribution's package stating its dependency on texlive-2007. You could either tell your package manager to ignore dependencies for the package, install a "dummy" package, or install the plugin manually instead of going through the package manager.

        – DevSolar
        Jun 20 '12 at 7:48








      13




      13





      I definitely second the Vim recommendation. For instance, it's very easy to define all kinds of keyboard shortcuts (e.g. for me 5prop turns into begin{proposition} end{proposition}) that make typing very easy.

      – Akhil Mathew
      Jul 31 '10 at 0:17





      I definitely second the Vim recommendation. For instance, it's very easy to define all kinds of keyboard shortcuts (e.g. for me 5prop turns into begin{proposition} end{proposition}) that make typing very easy.

      – Akhil Mathew
      Jul 31 '10 at 0:17




      3




      3





      And even if you don't want to use the vim-latex macros, you can define silly short cuts like I do: dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~ww278/#texres

      – Willie Wong
      Aug 3 '10 at 16:20





      And even if you don't want to use the vim-latex macros, you can define silly short cuts like I do: dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~ww278/#texres

      – Willie Wong
      Aug 3 '10 at 16:20




      2




      2





      vim (with plugins) and a Makefile.

      – Johan
      Aug 15 '10 at 9:40





      vim (with plugins) and a Makefile.

      – Johan
      Aug 15 '10 at 9:40




      3




      3





      There is always gVim for those of you who don't like the command line. and the vim-latex plugin is very helpful for completion of commands.

      – Dom
      Feb 17 '11 at 16:29





      There is always gVim for those of you who don't like the command line. and the vim-latex plugin is very helpful for completion of commands.

      – Dom
      Feb 17 '11 at 16:29




      4




      4





      @AymanElmasry: It's not the fault of vim-latex, it's the fault of your distribution's package stating its dependency on texlive-2007. You could either tell your package manager to ignore dependencies for the package, install a "dummy" package, or install the plugin manually instead of going through the package manager.

      – DevSolar
      Jun 20 '12 at 7:48





      @AymanElmasry: It's not the fault of vim-latex, it's the fault of your distribution's package stating its dependency on texlive-2007. You could either tell your package manager to ignore dependencies for the package, install a "dummy" package, or install the plugin manually instead of going through the package manager.

      – DevSolar
      Jun 20 '12 at 7:48











      241















      Texmaker — texmaker





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8, OS X 10.5+, Linux


      • License: GPL license, free


      • Languages: cs, de, el, en, es, fa, fr, gl, hu, it, nl, pl, pt, pt (bra), ru, se, sr, zh (cn), zh (tw)


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: ?


      • % !TEX directives: No


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, supports PDF


      • Project Management: Yes


      Texmaker sample document screen shot



      Customizable code completion

      Customizable code completion



      Rectangular block selection

      Rectangular block selection





      The editor TeXstudio started out as a fork of Texmaker and was originally called TexMakerX.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 13





        texmaker and the forked texmakerx sounded quite interesting, but then I realized that they support only LaTeX. Not so useful for a plain&ConTeXt user.

        – Taco Hoekwater
        Nov 12 '10 at 14:07






      • 3





        The texmakerx fork is new to me. Thanx for the tip!

        – Egon Willighagen
        Dec 16 '10 at 10:16






      • 27





        This is the best Latex IDE for beginners. I tried TexWorks, TexNicCenter, Notepad++ and TexMaker. And found TexMaker to be the most user friendly for newbies.

        – Marcel Valdez Orozco
        Sep 9 '12 at 19:21






      • 13





        The most useful feature of texmaker is missing in this list: whenever you have a main-tex, which input{} other content-tex, you can tell texmaker which tex is to run (called Master Document). So you don't have to switch to the main, press F1 (for Quick Build), and switch back to the tex you are currently working on. Just do your changes in the content.tex, press F1, and view the results. Second best feature I haven't seen with other IDEs: The build-in document viewer jumps to and highlights for some seconds the latest changes. I simply love that!

        – Dominikus K.
        Mar 6 '13 at 15:13








      • 4





        -1 TexMaker does some arcane evaluation of regular expressions in its search and replace box. This is wholely inappropriate in a LaTeX editor because of the common use of various characters between LaTeX and regex. The result is that one cannot simply replace all section{ with subsection{.

        – alx9r
        Apr 12 '13 at 18:20
















      241















      Texmaker — texmaker





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8, OS X 10.5+, Linux


      • License: GPL license, free


      • Languages: cs, de, el, en, es, fa, fr, gl, hu, it, nl, pl, pt, pt (bra), ru, se, sr, zh (cn), zh (tw)


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: ?


      • % !TEX directives: No


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, supports PDF


      • Project Management: Yes


      Texmaker sample document screen shot



      Customizable code completion

      Customizable code completion



      Rectangular block selection

      Rectangular block selection





      The editor TeXstudio started out as a fork of Texmaker and was originally called TexMakerX.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 13





        texmaker and the forked texmakerx sounded quite interesting, but then I realized that they support only LaTeX. Not so useful for a plain&ConTeXt user.

        – Taco Hoekwater
        Nov 12 '10 at 14:07






      • 3





        The texmakerx fork is new to me. Thanx for the tip!

        – Egon Willighagen
        Dec 16 '10 at 10:16






      • 27





        This is the best Latex IDE for beginners. I tried TexWorks, TexNicCenter, Notepad++ and TexMaker. And found TexMaker to be the most user friendly for newbies.

        – Marcel Valdez Orozco
        Sep 9 '12 at 19:21






      • 13





        The most useful feature of texmaker is missing in this list: whenever you have a main-tex, which input{} other content-tex, you can tell texmaker which tex is to run (called Master Document). So you don't have to switch to the main, press F1 (for Quick Build), and switch back to the tex you are currently working on. Just do your changes in the content.tex, press F1, and view the results. Second best feature I haven't seen with other IDEs: The build-in document viewer jumps to and highlights for some seconds the latest changes. I simply love that!

        – Dominikus K.
        Mar 6 '13 at 15:13








      • 4





        -1 TexMaker does some arcane evaluation of regular expressions in its search and replace box. This is wholely inappropriate in a LaTeX editor because of the common use of various characters between LaTeX and regex. The result is that one cannot simply replace all section{ with subsection{.

        – alx9r
        Apr 12 '13 at 18:20














      241












      241








      241








      Texmaker — texmaker





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8, OS X 10.5+, Linux


      • License: GPL license, free


      • Languages: cs, de, el, en, es, fa, fr, gl, hu, it, nl, pl, pt, pt (bra), ru, se, sr, zh (cn), zh (tw)


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: ?


      • % !TEX directives: No


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, supports PDF


      • Project Management: Yes


      Texmaker sample document screen shot



      Customizable code completion

      Customizable code completion



      Rectangular block selection

      Rectangular block selection





      The editor TeXstudio started out as a fork of Texmaker and was originally called TexMakerX.






      share|improve this answer
















      Texmaker — texmaker





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8, OS X 10.5+, Linux


      • License: GPL license, free


      • Languages: cs, de, el, en, es, fa, fr, gl, hu, it, nl, pl, pt, pt (bra), ru, se, sr, zh (cn), zh (tw)


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: ?


      • % !TEX directives: No


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, supports PDF


      • Project Management: Yes


      Texmaker sample document screen shot



      Customizable code completion

      Customizable code completion



      Rectangular block selection

      Rectangular block selection





      The editor TeXstudio started out as a fork of Texmaker and was originally called TexMakerX.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Nov 12 '17 at 11:57


























      community wiki





      11 revs, 7 users 67%
      doncherry









      • 13





        texmaker and the forked texmakerx sounded quite interesting, but then I realized that they support only LaTeX. Not so useful for a plain&ConTeXt user.

        – Taco Hoekwater
        Nov 12 '10 at 14:07






      • 3





        The texmakerx fork is new to me. Thanx for the tip!

        – Egon Willighagen
        Dec 16 '10 at 10:16






      • 27





        This is the best Latex IDE for beginners. I tried TexWorks, TexNicCenter, Notepad++ and TexMaker. And found TexMaker to be the most user friendly for newbies.

        – Marcel Valdez Orozco
        Sep 9 '12 at 19:21






      • 13





        The most useful feature of texmaker is missing in this list: whenever you have a main-tex, which input{} other content-tex, you can tell texmaker which tex is to run (called Master Document). So you don't have to switch to the main, press F1 (for Quick Build), and switch back to the tex you are currently working on. Just do your changes in the content.tex, press F1, and view the results. Second best feature I haven't seen with other IDEs: The build-in document viewer jumps to and highlights for some seconds the latest changes. I simply love that!

        – Dominikus K.
        Mar 6 '13 at 15:13








      • 4





        -1 TexMaker does some arcane evaluation of regular expressions in its search and replace box. This is wholely inappropriate in a LaTeX editor because of the common use of various characters between LaTeX and regex. The result is that one cannot simply replace all section{ with subsection{.

        – alx9r
        Apr 12 '13 at 18:20














      • 13





        texmaker and the forked texmakerx sounded quite interesting, but then I realized that they support only LaTeX. Not so useful for a plain&ConTeXt user.

        – Taco Hoekwater
        Nov 12 '10 at 14:07






      • 3





        The texmakerx fork is new to me. Thanx for the tip!

        – Egon Willighagen
        Dec 16 '10 at 10:16






      • 27





        This is the best Latex IDE for beginners. I tried TexWorks, TexNicCenter, Notepad++ and TexMaker. And found TexMaker to be the most user friendly for newbies.

        – Marcel Valdez Orozco
        Sep 9 '12 at 19:21






      • 13





        The most useful feature of texmaker is missing in this list: whenever you have a main-tex, which input{} other content-tex, you can tell texmaker which tex is to run (called Master Document). So you don't have to switch to the main, press F1 (for Quick Build), and switch back to the tex you are currently working on. Just do your changes in the content.tex, press F1, and view the results. Second best feature I haven't seen with other IDEs: The build-in document viewer jumps to and highlights for some seconds the latest changes. I simply love that!

        – Dominikus K.
        Mar 6 '13 at 15:13








      • 4





        -1 TexMaker does some arcane evaluation of regular expressions in its search and replace box. This is wholely inappropriate in a LaTeX editor because of the common use of various characters between LaTeX and regex. The result is that one cannot simply replace all section{ with subsection{.

        – alx9r
        Apr 12 '13 at 18:20








      13




      13





      texmaker and the forked texmakerx sounded quite interesting, but then I realized that they support only LaTeX. Not so useful for a plain&ConTeXt user.

      – Taco Hoekwater
      Nov 12 '10 at 14:07





      texmaker and the forked texmakerx sounded quite interesting, but then I realized that they support only LaTeX. Not so useful for a plain&ConTeXt user.

      – Taco Hoekwater
      Nov 12 '10 at 14:07




      3




      3





      The texmakerx fork is new to me. Thanx for the tip!

      – Egon Willighagen
      Dec 16 '10 at 10:16





      The texmakerx fork is new to me. Thanx for the tip!

      – Egon Willighagen
      Dec 16 '10 at 10:16




      27




      27





      This is the best Latex IDE for beginners. I tried TexWorks, TexNicCenter, Notepad++ and TexMaker. And found TexMaker to be the most user friendly for newbies.

      – Marcel Valdez Orozco
      Sep 9 '12 at 19:21





      This is the best Latex IDE for beginners. I tried TexWorks, TexNicCenter, Notepad++ and TexMaker. And found TexMaker to be the most user friendly for newbies.

      – Marcel Valdez Orozco
      Sep 9 '12 at 19:21




      13




      13





      The most useful feature of texmaker is missing in this list: whenever you have a main-tex, which input{} other content-tex, you can tell texmaker which tex is to run (called Master Document). So you don't have to switch to the main, press F1 (for Quick Build), and switch back to the tex you are currently working on. Just do your changes in the content.tex, press F1, and view the results. Second best feature I haven't seen with other IDEs: The build-in document viewer jumps to and highlights for some seconds the latest changes. I simply love that!

      – Dominikus K.
      Mar 6 '13 at 15:13







      The most useful feature of texmaker is missing in this list: whenever you have a main-tex, which input{} other content-tex, you can tell texmaker which tex is to run (called Master Document). So you don't have to switch to the main, press F1 (for Quick Build), and switch back to the tex you are currently working on. Just do your changes in the content.tex, press F1, and view the results. Second best feature I haven't seen with other IDEs: The build-in document viewer jumps to and highlights for some seconds the latest changes. I simply love that!

      – Dominikus K.
      Mar 6 '13 at 15:13






      4




      4





      -1 TexMaker does some arcane evaluation of regular expressions in its search and replace box. This is wholely inappropriate in a LaTeX editor because of the common use of various characters between LaTeX and regex. The result is that one cannot simply replace all section{ with subsection{.

      – alx9r
      Apr 12 '13 at 18:20





      -1 TexMaker does some arcane evaluation of regular expressions in its search and replace box. This is wholely inappropriate in a LaTeX editor because of the common use of various characters between LaTeX and regex. The result is that one cannot simply replace all section{ with subsection{.

      – alx9r
      Apr 12 '13 at 18:20











      175















      TeXworks — texworks





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8, OS X, Linux all pre-compiled plus source available


      • License: GPL


      • Languages: en, af, ar, ca, cs, de, fa, fo fr, it, ja, nl, ko, pl, pl, ru, sl, tr zh


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: Yes


      • % !TEX directives: Yes


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, regex-based


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable based on 'known entry' list


      • Code Folding: No


      • Spell Checking: Yes, but have to install by hand


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, PDF (Poppler-based, auto-follow option to scroll source and preview together)


      • Project Management: No




      Screen shot of TeXworks on the Mac: the layout stays the same on Windows and Linux:



      TeXworks sample document screen shot on Mac





      On Windows and Linux, I use TeXworks, which provides with an editor window and a document preview window. Clicking in the document preview locates the edit mark at that TeX source corresponding to the clicked location.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 8





        The fact that TeXWorks has both the goodies of a GUI (you can easily and instantly see what you get) and a pure text editor like Emacs (you, not a program, writes the code) really makes it a hot shot.

        – Tomas Aschan
        Aug 4 '10 at 16:51






      • 2





        +1 for TeXWorks --- still needs a few features that I can't live without, but I'm checking the progress regularly and I hope this could turn into the "standard" LaTeX editor.

        – Martin Tapankov
        Aug 19 '10 at 6:02








      • 1





        I love TeXWorks for easy, out-of-the-box two-way sync!

        – Chang
        Oct 21 '11 at 2:13






      • 1





        +1 for non-geek friendliness of TeXworks, which is sort of a paradox with LaTeX. I've used TeXworks to submit papers to IEEE conferences with success.

        – Fuhrmanator
        Aug 21 '12 at 20:29








      • 1





        Accesible dropdown menu to switch between different compilators (pdftex, Context (pdftex), pdflatex ...) A small minus for lack of printing possibility in the integrated pdf viewer.

        – PetaspeedBeaver
        Apr 3 '13 at 11:30


















      175















      TeXworks — texworks





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8, OS X, Linux all pre-compiled plus source available


      • License: GPL


      • Languages: en, af, ar, ca, cs, de, fa, fo fr, it, ja, nl, ko, pl, pl, ru, sl, tr zh


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: Yes


      • % !TEX directives: Yes


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, regex-based


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable based on 'known entry' list


      • Code Folding: No


      • Spell Checking: Yes, but have to install by hand


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, PDF (Poppler-based, auto-follow option to scroll source and preview together)


      • Project Management: No




      Screen shot of TeXworks on the Mac: the layout stays the same on Windows and Linux:



      TeXworks sample document screen shot on Mac





      On Windows and Linux, I use TeXworks, which provides with an editor window and a document preview window. Clicking in the document preview locates the edit mark at that TeX source corresponding to the clicked location.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 8





        The fact that TeXWorks has both the goodies of a GUI (you can easily and instantly see what you get) and a pure text editor like Emacs (you, not a program, writes the code) really makes it a hot shot.

        – Tomas Aschan
        Aug 4 '10 at 16:51






      • 2





        +1 for TeXWorks --- still needs a few features that I can't live without, but I'm checking the progress regularly and I hope this could turn into the "standard" LaTeX editor.

        – Martin Tapankov
        Aug 19 '10 at 6:02








      • 1





        I love TeXWorks for easy, out-of-the-box two-way sync!

        – Chang
        Oct 21 '11 at 2:13






      • 1





        +1 for non-geek friendliness of TeXworks, which is sort of a paradox with LaTeX. I've used TeXworks to submit papers to IEEE conferences with success.

        – Fuhrmanator
        Aug 21 '12 at 20:29








      • 1





        Accesible dropdown menu to switch between different compilators (pdftex, Context (pdftex), pdflatex ...) A small minus for lack of printing possibility in the integrated pdf viewer.

        – PetaspeedBeaver
        Apr 3 '13 at 11:30
















      175












      175








      175








      TeXworks — texworks





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8, OS X, Linux all pre-compiled plus source available


      • License: GPL


      • Languages: en, af, ar, ca, cs, de, fa, fo fr, it, ja, nl, ko, pl, pl, ru, sl, tr zh


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: Yes


      • % !TEX directives: Yes


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, regex-based


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable based on 'known entry' list


      • Code Folding: No


      • Spell Checking: Yes, but have to install by hand


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, PDF (Poppler-based, auto-follow option to scroll source and preview together)


      • Project Management: No




      Screen shot of TeXworks on the Mac: the layout stays the same on Windows and Linux:



      TeXworks sample document screen shot on Mac





      On Windows and Linux, I use TeXworks, which provides with an editor window and a document preview window. Clicking in the document preview locates the edit mark at that TeX source corresponding to the clicked location.






      share|improve this answer
















      TeXworks — texworks





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8, OS X, Linux all pre-compiled plus source available


      • License: GPL


      • Languages: en, af, ar, ca, cs, de, fa, fo fr, it, ja, nl, ko, pl, pl, ru, sl, tr zh


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: Yes


      • % !TEX directives: Yes


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, regex-based


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable based on 'known entry' list


      • Code Folding: No


      • Spell Checking: Yes, but have to install by hand


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, PDF (Poppler-based, auto-follow option to scroll source and preview together)


      • Project Management: No




      Screen shot of TeXworks on the Mac: the layout stays the same on Windows and Linux:



      TeXworks sample document screen shot on Mac





      On Windows and Linux, I use TeXworks, which provides with an editor window and a document preview window. Clicking in the document preview locates the edit mark at that TeX source corresponding to the clicked location.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Nov 1 '15 at 17:41


























      community wiki





      19 revs, 8 users 41%
      Joseph Wright









      • 8





        The fact that TeXWorks has both the goodies of a GUI (you can easily and instantly see what you get) and a pure text editor like Emacs (you, not a program, writes the code) really makes it a hot shot.

        – Tomas Aschan
        Aug 4 '10 at 16:51






      • 2





        +1 for TeXWorks --- still needs a few features that I can't live without, but I'm checking the progress regularly and I hope this could turn into the "standard" LaTeX editor.

        – Martin Tapankov
        Aug 19 '10 at 6:02








      • 1





        I love TeXWorks for easy, out-of-the-box two-way sync!

        – Chang
        Oct 21 '11 at 2:13






      • 1





        +1 for non-geek friendliness of TeXworks, which is sort of a paradox with LaTeX. I've used TeXworks to submit papers to IEEE conferences with success.

        – Fuhrmanator
        Aug 21 '12 at 20:29








      • 1





        Accesible dropdown menu to switch between different compilators (pdftex, Context (pdftex), pdflatex ...) A small minus for lack of printing possibility in the integrated pdf viewer.

        – PetaspeedBeaver
        Apr 3 '13 at 11:30
















      • 8





        The fact that TeXWorks has both the goodies of a GUI (you can easily and instantly see what you get) and a pure text editor like Emacs (you, not a program, writes the code) really makes it a hot shot.

        – Tomas Aschan
        Aug 4 '10 at 16:51






      • 2





        +1 for TeXWorks --- still needs a few features that I can't live without, but I'm checking the progress regularly and I hope this could turn into the "standard" LaTeX editor.

        – Martin Tapankov
        Aug 19 '10 at 6:02








      • 1





        I love TeXWorks for easy, out-of-the-box two-way sync!

        – Chang
        Oct 21 '11 at 2:13






      • 1





        +1 for non-geek friendliness of TeXworks, which is sort of a paradox with LaTeX. I've used TeXworks to submit papers to IEEE conferences with success.

        – Fuhrmanator
        Aug 21 '12 at 20:29








      • 1





        Accesible dropdown menu to switch between different compilators (pdftex, Context (pdftex), pdflatex ...) A small minus for lack of printing possibility in the integrated pdf viewer.

        – PetaspeedBeaver
        Apr 3 '13 at 11:30










      8




      8





      The fact that TeXWorks has both the goodies of a GUI (you can easily and instantly see what you get) and a pure text editor like Emacs (you, not a program, writes the code) really makes it a hot shot.

      – Tomas Aschan
      Aug 4 '10 at 16:51





      The fact that TeXWorks has both the goodies of a GUI (you can easily and instantly see what you get) and a pure text editor like Emacs (you, not a program, writes the code) really makes it a hot shot.

      – Tomas Aschan
      Aug 4 '10 at 16:51




      2




      2





      +1 for TeXWorks --- still needs a few features that I can't live without, but I'm checking the progress regularly and I hope this could turn into the "standard" LaTeX editor.

      – Martin Tapankov
      Aug 19 '10 at 6:02







      +1 for TeXWorks --- still needs a few features that I can't live without, but I'm checking the progress regularly and I hope this could turn into the "standard" LaTeX editor.

      – Martin Tapankov
      Aug 19 '10 at 6:02






      1




      1





      I love TeXWorks for easy, out-of-the-box two-way sync!

      – Chang
      Oct 21 '11 at 2:13





      I love TeXWorks for easy, out-of-the-box two-way sync!

      – Chang
      Oct 21 '11 at 2:13




      1




      1





      +1 for non-geek friendliness of TeXworks, which is sort of a paradox with LaTeX. I've used TeXworks to submit papers to IEEE conferences with success.

      – Fuhrmanator
      Aug 21 '12 at 20:29







      +1 for non-geek friendliness of TeXworks, which is sort of a paradox with LaTeX. I've used TeXworks to submit papers to IEEE conferences with success.

      – Fuhrmanator
      Aug 21 '12 at 20:29






      1




      1





      Accesible dropdown menu to switch between different compilators (pdftex, Context (pdftex), pdflatex ...) A small minus for lack of printing possibility in the integrated pdf viewer.

      – PetaspeedBeaver
      Apr 3 '13 at 11:30







      Accesible dropdown menu to switch between different compilators (pdftex, Context (pdftex), pdflatex ...) A small minus for lack of printing possibility in the integrated pdf viewer.

      – PetaspeedBeaver
      Apr 3 '13 at 11:30













      167















      Kile — kile





      • Platforms: Linux, Windows1 (XP, Vista, 7)


      • License: GNU GPL 2


      • Languages: bg, bs, ca, cs, da, de, el, en_GB, eo, es, et, fi, fr, ga, gl, hi, hne, hu, it, ja, kk, lt, mai, ms, nb, nds, nl, nn, pl, pt, pt_BR, ro, ru, sk, sv, tr, ug, uk, zh_CN, zh_TW


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: Yes


      • % !TEX directives: No2


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes [uses system dictionaries so works even for unsupported languages]


      • SyncTeX: Yes (but the -synctex=1 flag must be added manually to the build engine)


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Limited3 (PNG preview of snippets – e.g. current environment or selection – converted from DVI/PS/PDF)


      • Project Management: Yes


      • Command Line: Yes


      • Structure/Outline View: Yes


      • VI Input Mode: Yes


      Sample document in Kile on Windows with default settings and structure view open.



      1 Starting from version 3.0, there is a windows installer available.
      Installation instructions for 2.x versions can be found here.
      The Windows version of the KDE applications is not finalised, so some of them may be unstable.



      2 While Kile does not have !TeX directives for defining compilation tool etc., it does have some "magic comments", similar to Latexila and TeXStudio. They are %TODO and %FIXME, which appears in the structure view, for adding notes in the code, and %BEGIN/%END for defining foldable regions of code.



      3 A full built-in output viewer will be available in Kile 3 and is already available by compiling the Kile git master branch






      share|improve this answer





















      • 9





        Kile is a wonderful program for LaTeX editing, some of the features like creating tables automatically, image insertion, and list/enumeration macros are extremely helpful. As a beginner, Kile basically taught me LaTeX. +1!

        – EricR
        Jul 27 '10 at 15:41






      • 25





        Kile is the editor when you're on Linux, and find that vim/emacs is too much effort to learn.

        – Martin Tapankov
        Aug 19 '10 at 5:44






      • 8





        Kile's the editor I've been looking for for years. Few nagging "features" that can all be disabled, everything's customizable to my likings (and I have very special ones indeed) and so on.

        – David
        Dec 11 '11 at 19:43








      • 3





        @RyanReich GNOME the de facto standard desktop? Maybe in the US, where Red Hat is strong, but certainly not in Europe.

        – mafp
        Jan 16 '13 at 22:02






      • 4





        I just installed it and been using all day. I think this is the best latex editor I tried so far, and I tried few. Easy to use.

        – Nasser
        Jun 17 '13 at 22:25
















      167















      Kile — kile





      • Platforms: Linux, Windows1 (XP, Vista, 7)


      • License: GNU GPL 2


      • Languages: bg, bs, ca, cs, da, de, el, en_GB, eo, es, et, fi, fr, ga, gl, hi, hne, hu, it, ja, kk, lt, mai, ms, nb, nds, nl, nn, pl, pt, pt_BR, ro, ru, sk, sv, tr, ug, uk, zh_CN, zh_TW


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: Yes


      • % !TEX directives: No2


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes [uses system dictionaries so works even for unsupported languages]


      • SyncTeX: Yes (but the -synctex=1 flag must be added manually to the build engine)


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Limited3 (PNG preview of snippets – e.g. current environment or selection – converted from DVI/PS/PDF)


      • Project Management: Yes


      • Command Line: Yes


      • Structure/Outline View: Yes


      • VI Input Mode: Yes


      Sample document in Kile on Windows with default settings and structure view open.



      1 Starting from version 3.0, there is a windows installer available.
      Installation instructions for 2.x versions can be found here.
      The Windows version of the KDE applications is not finalised, so some of them may be unstable.



      2 While Kile does not have !TeX directives for defining compilation tool etc., it does have some "magic comments", similar to Latexila and TeXStudio. They are %TODO and %FIXME, which appears in the structure view, for adding notes in the code, and %BEGIN/%END for defining foldable regions of code.



      3 A full built-in output viewer will be available in Kile 3 and is already available by compiling the Kile git master branch






      share|improve this answer





















      • 9





        Kile is a wonderful program for LaTeX editing, some of the features like creating tables automatically, image insertion, and list/enumeration macros are extremely helpful. As a beginner, Kile basically taught me LaTeX. +1!

        – EricR
        Jul 27 '10 at 15:41






      • 25





        Kile is the editor when you're on Linux, and find that vim/emacs is too much effort to learn.

        – Martin Tapankov
        Aug 19 '10 at 5:44






      • 8





        Kile's the editor I've been looking for for years. Few nagging "features" that can all be disabled, everything's customizable to my likings (and I have very special ones indeed) and so on.

        – David
        Dec 11 '11 at 19:43








      • 3





        @RyanReich GNOME the de facto standard desktop? Maybe in the US, where Red Hat is strong, but certainly not in Europe.

        – mafp
        Jan 16 '13 at 22:02






      • 4





        I just installed it and been using all day. I think this is the best latex editor I tried so far, and I tried few. Easy to use.

        – Nasser
        Jun 17 '13 at 22:25














      167












      167








      167








      Kile — kile





      • Platforms: Linux, Windows1 (XP, Vista, 7)


      • License: GNU GPL 2


      • Languages: bg, bs, ca, cs, da, de, el, en_GB, eo, es, et, fi, fr, ga, gl, hi, hne, hu, it, ja, kk, lt, mai, ms, nb, nds, nl, nn, pl, pt, pt_BR, ro, ru, sk, sv, tr, ug, uk, zh_CN, zh_TW


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: Yes


      • % !TEX directives: No2


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes [uses system dictionaries so works even for unsupported languages]


      • SyncTeX: Yes (but the -synctex=1 flag must be added manually to the build engine)


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Limited3 (PNG preview of snippets – e.g. current environment or selection – converted from DVI/PS/PDF)


      • Project Management: Yes


      • Command Line: Yes


      • Structure/Outline View: Yes


      • VI Input Mode: Yes


      Sample document in Kile on Windows with default settings and structure view open.



      1 Starting from version 3.0, there is a windows installer available.
      Installation instructions for 2.x versions can be found here.
      The Windows version of the KDE applications is not finalised, so some of them may be unstable.



      2 While Kile does not have !TeX directives for defining compilation tool etc., it does have some "magic comments", similar to Latexila and TeXStudio. They are %TODO and %FIXME, which appears in the structure view, for adding notes in the code, and %BEGIN/%END for defining foldable regions of code.



      3 A full built-in output viewer will be available in Kile 3 and is already available by compiling the Kile git master branch






      share|improve this answer
















      Kile — kile





      • Platforms: Linux, Windows1 (XP, Vista, 7)


      • License: GNU GPL 2


      • Languages: bg, bs, ca, cs, da, de, el, en_GB, eo, es, et, fi, fr, ga, gl, hi, hne, hu, it, ja, kk, lt, mai, ms, nb, nds, nl, nn, pl, pt, pt_BR, ro, ru, sk, sv, tr, ug, uk, zh_CN, zh_TW


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: Yes


      • % !TEX directives: No2


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes [uses system dictionaries so works even for unsupported languages]


      • SyncTeX: Yes (but the -synctex=1 flag must be added manually to the build engine)


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Limited3 (PNG preview of snippets – e.g. current environment or selection – converted from DVI/PS/PDF)


      • Project Management: Yes


      • Command Line: Yes


      • Structure/Outline View: Yes


      • VI Input Mode: Yes


      Sample document in Kile on Windows with default settings and structure view open.



      1 Starting from version 3.0, there is a windows installer available.
      Installation instructions for 2.x versions can be found here.
      The Windows version of the KDE applications is not finalised, so some of them may be unstable.



      2 While Kile does not have !TeX directives for defining compilation tool etc., it does have some "magic comments", similar to Latexila and TeXStudio. They are %TODO and %FIXME, which appears in the structure view, for adding notes in the code, and %BEGIN/%END for defining foldable regions of code.



      3 A full built-in output viewer will be available in Kile 3 and is already available by compiling the Kile git master branch







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Jan 20 '18 at 19:11


























      community wiki





      9 revs, 7 users 33%
      Torbjørn T.









      • 9





        Kile is a wonderful program for LaTeX editing, some of the features like creating tables automatically, image insertion, and list/enumeration macros are extremely helpful. As a beginner, Kile basically taught me LaTeX. +1!

        – EricR
        Jul 27 '10 at 15:41






      • 25





        Kile is the editor when you're on Linux, and find that vim/emacs is too much effort to learn.

        – Martin Tapankov
        Aug 19 '10 at 5:44






      • 8





        Kile's the editor I've been looking for for years. Few nagging "features" that can all be disabled, everything's customizable to my likings (and I have very special ones indeed) and so on.

        – David
        Dec 11 '11 at 19:43








      • 3





        @RyanReich GNOME the de facto standard desktop? Maybe in the US, where Red Hat is strong, but certainly not in Europe.

        – mafp
        Jan 16 '13 at 22:02






      • 4





        I just installed it and been using all day. I think this is the best latex editor I tried so far, and I tried few. Easy to use.

        – Nasser
        Jun 17 '13 at 22:25














      • 9





        Kile is a wonderful program for LaTeX editing, some of the features like creating tables automatically, image insertion, and list/enumeration macros are extremely helpful. As a beginner, Kile basically taught me LaTeX. +1!

        – EricR
        Jul 27 '10 at 15:41






      • 25





        Kile is the editor when you're on Linux, and find that vim/emacs is too much effort to learn.

        – Martin Tapankov
        Aug 19 '10 at 5:44






      • 8





        Kile's the editor I've been looking for for years. Few nagging "features" that can all be disabled, everything's customizable to my likings (and I have very special ones indeed) and so on.

        – David
        Dec 11 '11 at 19:43








      • 3





        @RyanReich GNOME the de facto standard desktop? Maybe in the US, where Red Hat is strong, but certainly not in Europe.

        – mafp
        Jan 16 '13 at 22:02






      • 4





        I just installed it and been using all day. I think this is the best latex editor I tried so far, and I tried few. Easy to use.

        – Nasser
        Jun 17 '13 at 22:25








      9




      9





      Kile is a wonderful program for LaTeX editing, some of the features like creating tables automatically, image insertion, and list/enumeration macros are extremely helpful. As a beginner, Kile basically taught me LaTeX. +1!

      – EricR
      Jul 27 '10 at 15:41





      Kile is a wonderful program for LaTeX editing, some of the features like creating tables automatically, image insertion, and list/enumeration macros are extremely helpful. As a beginner, Kile basically taught me LaTeX. +1!

      – EricR
      Jul 27 '10 at 15:41




      25




      25





      Kile is the editor when you're on Linux, and find that vim/emacs is too much effort to learn.

      – Martin Tapankov
      Aug 19 '10 at 5:44





      Kile is the editor when you're on Linux, and find that vim/emacs is too much effort to learn.

      – Martin Tapankov
      Aug 19 '10 at 5:44




      8




      8





      Kile's the editor I've been looking for for years. Few nagging "features" that can all be disabled, everything's customizable to my likings (and I have very special ones indeed) and so on.

      – David
      Dec 11 '11 at 19:43







      Kile's the editor I've been looking for for years. Few nagging "features" that can all be disabled, everything's customizable to my likings (and I have very special ones indeed) and so on.

      – David
      Dec 11 '11 at 19:43






      3




      3





      @RyanReich GNOME the de facto standard desktop? Maybe in the US, where Red Hat is strong, but certainly not in Europe.

      – mafp
      Jan 16 '13 at 22:02





      @RyanReich GNOME the de facto standard desktop? Maybe in the US, where Red Hat is strong, but certainly not in Europe.

      – mafp
      Jan 16 '13 at 22:02




      4




      4





      I just installed it and been using all day. I think this is the best latex editor I tried so far, and I tried few. Easy to use.

      – Nasser
      Jun 17 '13 at 22:25





      I just installed it and been using all day. I think this is the best latex editor I tried so far, and I tried few. Easy to use.

      – Nasser
      Jun 17 '13 at 22:25











      159















      Sublime Text with LaTeXTools plugin



      Available for: Windows, Mac, Linux





      This is a simple, but powerful, editor. It's similar to Notepad++, but available on multiple platforms, and much easier to setup for LaTeX with the LaTeXTools plugin, which is available from the Package Control tool. It is also similar to TextMate, but is being actively developed and has a huge community which develops plug-ins for. It's also much prettier than both of them!



      Note that this commercial software, and inquires a licence after an evaluation period (costs $70 USD). It is possible to run Sublime Text without buying a licence, but you will be reminded that you are using an unregistered copy.



      Sublime Text features some really powerful tools when it comes to typing, some of which you don't understand that you could do without:




      • multiple cursors

      • go-to anything

      • snippets

      • incremental find

      • project management

      • numerous build-systems


      and more (take a look at Perfect Workflow in Sublime Text 2). The screenshot below also displays its feature for finding citations from BibTeX.



      Sublime Text is an almost completely text based editor, with almost unlimited potential. The list of features is about as long as you want it to be. Install Package Manager, and you have a long list of repositories only a few seconds install-on-the-fly away.





      • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Unix


      • Licence: Free to try, free to buy


      • % !TEX directives: Yes


      • Syntax highlighting: Yes


      • Code completion: Yes


      • Code folding: Yes


      • Spell check: Yes, both built-in and external packages


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in output viewer: No


      • Project management: Yes


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer





















      • 4





        The evaluation period can last forever, I've been using it for over a year.

        – levesque
        Feb 27 '13 at 20:06






      • 13





        Also, when used with Skim you get a very, very fast compiling PDF viewer that syncs with your code to give you the same PDF functionality that other editors provide.

        – BoZiffer
        Mar 15 '13 at 1:44













      • The video "Perfect Workflow in Sublime Text 2" is no longer available. Is there a good video for replacement?

        – Martin Thoma
        Mar 16 '14 at 18:56






      • 1





        Definitely recommend Sublime. It has vim integration, has spellchecking... Whatever you want, you can find it here! It is THE solution for all platforms :) A pity that it hasn't been voted higher up, that when I first viewed this list I didn't notice it.

        – xji
        Jun 11 '14 at 0:34








      • 3





        What on Earth does 'free to buy' mean?! Also, I am very pleased to know that it has features which I 'don't understand I could do without'. This seems very likely true since it has features of which I am entirely unaware and it is extremely probable that there are some I can do without ;).

        – cfr
        Oct 19 '14 at 23:31
















      159















      Sublime Text with LaTeXTools plugin



      Available for: Windows, Mac, Linux





      This is a simple, but powerful, editor. It's similar to Notepad++, but available on multiple platforms, and much easier to setup for LaTeX with the LaTeXTools plugin, which is available from the Package Control tool. It is also similar to TextMate, but is being actively developed and has a huge community which develops plug-ins for. It's also much prettier than both of them!



      Note that this commercial software, and inquires a licence after an evaluation period (costs $70 USD). It is possible to run Sublime Text without buying a licence, but you will be reminded that you are using an unregistered copy.



      Sublime Text features some really powerful tools when it comes to typing, some of which you don't understand that you could do without:




      • multiple cursors

      • go-to anything

      • snippets

      • incremental find

      • project management

      • numerous build-systems


      and more (take a look at Perfect Workflow in Sublime Text 2). The screenshot below also displays its feature for finding citations from BibTeX.



      Sublime Text is an almost completely text based editor, with almost unlimited potential. The list of features is about as long as you want it to be. Install Package Manager, and you have a long list of repositories only a few seconds install-on-the-fly away.





      • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Unix


      • Licence: Free to try, free to buy


      • % !TEX directives: Yes


      • Syntax highlighting: Yes


      • Code completion: Yes


      • Code folding: Yes


      • Spell check: Yes, both built-in and external packages


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in output viewer: No


      • Project management: Yes


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer





















      • 4





        The evaluation period can last forever, I've been using it for over a year.

        – levesque
        Feb 27 '13 at 20:06






      • 13





        Also, when used with Skim you get a very, very fast compiling PDF viewer that syncs with your code to give you the same PDF functionality that other editors provide.

        – BoZiffer
        Mar 15 '13 at 1:44













      • The video "Perfect Workflow in Sublime Text 2" is no longer available. Is there a good video for replacement?

        – Martin Thoma
        Mar 16 '14 at 18:56






      • 1





        Definitely recommend Sublime. It has vim integration, has spellchecking... Whatever you want, you can find it here! It is THE solution for all platforms :) A pity that it hasn't been voted higher up, that when I first viewed this list I didn't notice it.

        – xji
        Jun 11 '14 at 0:34








      • 3





        What on Earth does 'free to buy' mean?! Also, I am very pleased to know that it has features which I 'don't understand I could do without'. This seems very likely true since it has features of which I am entirely unaware and it is extremely probable that there are some I can do without ;).

        – cfr
        Oct 19 '14 at 23:31














      159












      159








      159








      Sublime Text with LaTeXTools plugin



      Available for: Windows, Mac, Linux





      This is a simple, but powerful, editor. It's similar to Notepad++, but available on multiple platforms, and much easier to setup for LaTeX with the LaTeXTools plugin, which is available from the Package Control tool. It is also similar to TextMate, but is being actively developed and has a huge community which develops plug-ins for. It's also much prettier than both of them!



      Note that this commercial software, and inquires a licence after an evaluation period (costs $70 USD). It is possible to run Sublime Text without buying a licence, but you will be reminded that you are using an unregistered copy.



      Sublime Text features some really powerful tools when it comes to typing, some of which you don't understand that you could do without:




      • multiple cursors

      • go-to anything

      • snippets

      • incremental find

      • project management

      • numerous build-systems


      and more (take a look at Perfect Workflow in Sublime Text 2). The screenshot below also displays its feature for finding citations from BibTeX.



      Sublime Text is an almost completely text based editor, with almost unlimited potential. The list of features is about as long as you want it to be. Install Package Manager, and you have a long list of repositories only a few seconds install-on-the-fly away.





      • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Unix


      • Licence: Free to try, free to buy


      • % !TEX directives: Yes


      • Syntax highlighting: Yes


      • Code completion: Yes


      • Code folding: Yes


      • Spell check: Yes, both built-in and external packages


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in output viewer: No


      • Project management: Yes


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer
















      Sublime Text with LaTeXTools plugin



      Available for: Windows, Mac, Linux





      This is a simple, but powerful, editor. It's similar to Notepad++, but available on multiple platforms, and much easier to setup for LaTeX with the LaTeXTools plugin, which is available from the Package Control tool. It is also similar to TextMate, but is being actively developed and has a huge community which develops plug-ins for. It's also much prettier than both of them!



      Note that this commercial software, and inquires a licence after an evaluation period (costs $70 USD). It is possible to run Sublime Text without buying a licence, but you will be reminded that you are using an unregistered copy.



      Sublime Text features some really powerful tools when it comes to typing, some of which you don't understand that you could do without:




      • multiple cursors

      • go-to anything

      • snippets

      • incremental find

      • project management

      • numerous build-systems


      and more (take a look at Perfect Workflow in Sublime Text 2). The screenshot below also displays its feature for finding citations from BibTeX.



      Sublime Text is an almost completely text based editor, with almost unlimited potential. The list of features is about as long as you want it to be. Install Package Manager, and you have a long list of repositories only a few seconds install-on-the-fly away.





      • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Unix


      • Licence: Free to try, free to buy


      • % !TEX directives: Yes


      • Syntax highlighting: Yes


      • Code completion: Yes


      • Code folding: Yes


      • Spell check: Yes, both built-in and external packages


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in output viewer: No


      • Project management: Yes


      enter image description here







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 8 mins ago


























      community wiki





      9 revs, 4 users 64%
      Holene









      • 4





        The evaluation period can last forever, I've been using it for over a year.

        – levesque
        Feb 27 '13 at 20:06






      • 13





        Also, when used with Skim you get a very, very fast compiling PDF viewer that syncs with your code to give you the same PDF functionality that other editors provide.

        – BoZiffer
        Mar 15 '13 at 1:44













      • The video "Perfect Workflow in Sublime Text 2" is no longer available. Is there a good video for replacement?

        – Martin Thoma
        Mar 16 '14 at 18:56






      • 1





        Definitely recommend Sublime. It has vim integration, has spellchecking... Whatever you want, you can find it here! It is THE solution for all platforms :) A pity that it hasn't been voted higher up, that when I first viewed this list I didn't notice it.

        – xji
        Jun 11 '14 at 0:34








      • 3





        What on Earth does 'free to buy' mean?! Also, I am very pleased to know that it has features which I 'don't understand I could do without'. This seems very likely true since it has features of which I am entirely unaware and it is extremely probable that there are some I can do without ;).

        – cfr
        Oct 19 '14 at 23:31














      • 4





        The evaluation period can last forever, I've been using it for over a year.

        – levesque
        Feb 27 '13 at 20:06






      • 13





        Also, when used with Skim you get a very, very fast compiling PDF viewer that syncs with your code to give you the same PDF functionality that other editors provide.

        – BoZiffer
        Mar 15 '13 at 1:44













      • The video "Perfect Workflow in Sublime Text 2" is no longer available. Is there a good video for replacement?

        – Martin Thoma
        Mar 16 '14 at 18:56






      • 1





        Definitely recommend Sublime. It has vim integration, has spellchecking... Whatever you want, you can find it here! It is THE solution for all platforms :) A pity that it hasn't been voted higher up, that when I first viewed this list I didn't notice it.

        – xji
        Jun 11 '14 at 0:34








      • 3





        What on Earth does 'free to buy' mean?! Also, I am very pleased to know that it has features which I 'don't understand I could do without'. This seems very likely true since it has features of which I am entirely unaware and it is extremely probable that there are some I can do without ;).

        – cfr
        Oct 19 '14 at 23:31








      4




      4





      The evaluation period can last forever, I've been using it for over a year.

      – levesque
      Feb 27 '13 at 20:06





      The evaluation period can last forever, I've been using it for over a year.

      – levesque
      Feb 27 '13 at 20:06




      13




      13





      Also, when used with Skim you get a very, very fast compiling PDF viewer that syncs with your code to give you the same PDF functionality that other editors provide.

      – BoZiffer
      Mar 15 '13 at 1:44







      Also, when used with Skim you get a very, very fast compiling PDF viewer that syncs with your code to give you the same PDF functionality that other editors provide.

      – BoZiffer
      Mar 15 '13 at 1:44















      The video "Perfect Workflow in Sublime Text 2" is no longer available. Is there a good video for replacement?

      – Martin Thoma
      Mar 16 '14 at 18:56





      The video "Perfect Workflow in Sublime Text 2" is no longer available. Is there a good video for replacement?

      – Martin Thoma
      Mar 16 '14 at 18:56




      1




      1





      Definitely recommend Sublime. It has vim integration, has spellchecking... Whatever you want, you can find it here! It is THE solution for all platforms :) A pity that it hasn't been voted higher up, that when I first viewed this list I didn't notice it.

      – xji
      Jun 11 '14 at 0:34







      Definitely recommend Sublime. It has vim integration, has spellchecking... Whatever you want, you can find it here! It is THE solution for all platforms :) A pity that it hasn't been voted higher up, that when I first viewed this list I didn't notice it.

      – xji
      Jun 11 '14 at 0:34






      3




      3





      What on Earth does 'free to buy' mean?! Also, I am very pleased to know that it has features which I 'don't understand I could do without'. This seems very likely true since it has features of which I am entirely unaware and it is extremely probable that there are some I can do without ;).

      – cfr
      Oct 19 '14 at 23:31





      What on Earth does 'free to buy' mean?! Also, I am very pleased to know that it has features which I 'don't understand I could do without'. This seems very likely true since it has features of which I am entirely unaware and it is extremely probable that there are some I can do without ;).

      – cfr
      Oct 19 '14 at 23:31











      114














      TexShop



      Available for: Mac

      Open Source





      In Mac I use TexShop, shipped with MacTeX, and works smoothly together with MacTeX.



      Among the features that it has are:



      Editing features




      • syntax highlighting

      • source/PDF synchronization

      • autocompletion of commands and environments

      • macros

      • stationery (for document templates)

      • latex panel of commonly used symbols

      • matrix panel for simple array input

      • import spreadsheet cells with LaTeX formatting

      • regex search/replace


      Processing features




      • built-in support for TeX, LaTeX, Xe(La)TeX, Lua(La)TeX, ConTeXt, BibTeX, biber

      • built-in support for Sketch, Asymptote, Sage, LilyPond, LatexMk, MetaPost

      • user definable Engines (scripts to process documents)






      share|improve this answer





















      • 9





        I also like TeXShop because you can have side by side source and pdf output, also with two-way synchronization between them (Cmd+Click on a piece of code and you're taken to its place on the output). The only things I miss are tabs to organize many open files and better project management.

        – Juan A. Navarro
        Jul 30 '10 at 6:08






      • 5





        I also used TeXShop, as it is a very clean and powerful editor with a great pdf viewer included. I abandoned it because I wanted code folding and a structure (tree) view for faster navigation in my large document and therefore now I use TexMakerX (tex.stackexchange.com/questions/339/latex-editors-ides/…) for my thesis (and TeXShop sometimes for smaller documents)

        – MostlyHarmless
        Apr 8 '11 at 18:30






      • 3





        Did they remove that feature? TeXShop used to support the use of an external editor!

        – cfr
        Dec 22 '13 at 0:33











      • I consider it a rather large drawback that TexShop is only available for Mac and not other platforms.

        – Peter Pablo
        Apr 22 '15 at 14:03











      • I use TexShop in combination with neoVim and some Latex and Snipmate Plugins. Works like a charm! There may not be an official "external editor" feature (idk), but you can open a main file with texshop and edit the content files with whatever editor you like.

        – mike
        Dec 7 '15 at 9:32
















      114














      TexShop



      Available for: Mac

      Open Source





      In Mac I use TexShop, shipped with MacTeX, and works smoothly together with MacTeX.



      Among the features that it has are:



      Editing features




      • syntax highlighting

      • source/PDF synchronization

      • autocompletion of commands and environments

      • macros

      • stationery (for document templates)

      • latex panel of commonly used symbols

      • matrix panel for simple array input

      • import spreadsheet cells with LaTeX formatting

      • regex search/replace


      Processing features




      • built-in support for TeX, LaTeX, Xe(La)TeX, Lua(La)TeX, ConTeXt, BibTeX, biber

      • built-in support for Sketch, Asymptote, Sage, LilyPond, LatexMk, MetaPost

      • user definable Engines (scripts to process documents)






      share|improve this answer





















      • 9





        I also like TeXShop because you can have side by side source and pdf output, also with two-way synchronization between them (Cmd+Click on a piece of code and you're taken to its place on the output). The only things I miss are tabs to organize many open files and better project management.

        – Juan A. Navarro
        Jul 30 '10 at 6:08






      • 5





        I also used TeXShop, as it is a very clean and powerful editor with a great pdf viewer included. I abandoned it because I wanted code folding and a structure (tree) view for faster navigation in my large document and therefore now I use TexMakerX (tex.stackexchange.com/questions/339/latex-editors-ides/…) for my thesis (and TeXShop sometimes for smaller documents)

        – MostlyHarmless
        Apr 8 '11 at 18:30






      • 3





        Did they remove that feature? TeXShop used to support the use of an external editor!

        – cfr
        Dec 22 '13 at 0:33











      • I consider it a rather large drawback that TexShop is only available for Mac and not other platforms.

        – Peter Pablo
        Apr 22 '15 at 14:03











      • I use TexShop in combination with neoVim and some Latex and Snipmate Plugins. Works like a charm! There may not be an official "external editor" feature (idk), but you can open a main file with texshop and edit the content files with whatever editor you like.

        – mike
        Dec 7 '15 at 9:32














      114












      114








      114







      TexShop



      Available for: Mac

      Open Source





      In Mac I use TexShop, shipped with MacTeX, and works smoothly together with MacTeX.



      Among the features that it has are:



      Editing features




      • syntax highlighting

      • source/PDF synchronization

      • autocompletion of commands and environments

      • macros

      • stationery (for document templates)

      • latex panel of commonly used symbols

      • matrix panel for simple array input

      • import spreadsheet cells with LaTeX formatting

      • regex search/replace


      Processing features




      • built-in support for TeX, LaTeX, Xe(La)TeX, Lua(La)TeX, ConTeXt, BibTeX, biber

      • built-in support for Sketch, Asymptote, Sage, LilyPond, LatexMk, MetaPost

      • user definable Engines (scripts to process documents)






      share|improve this answer















      TexShop



      Available for: Mac

      Open Source





      In Mac I use TexShop, shipped with MacTeX, and works smoothly together with MacTeX.



      Among the features that it has are:



      Editing features




      • syntax highlighting

      • source/PDF synchronization

      • autocompletion of commands and environments

      • macros

      • stationery (for document templates)

      • latex panel of commonly used symbols

      • matrix panel for simple array input

      • import spreadsheet cells with LaTeX formatting

      • regex search/replace


      Processing features




      • built-in support for TeX, LaTeX, Xe(La)TeX, Lua(La)TeX, ConTeXt, BibTeX, biber

      • built-in support for Sketch, Asymptote, Sage, LilyPond, LatexMk, MetaPost

      • user definable Engines (scripts to process documents)







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Mar 26 '17 at 14:59


























      community wiki





      8 revs, 6 users 49%
      Alan Munn









      • 9





        I also like TeXShop because you can have side by side source and pdf output, also with two-way synchronization between them (Cmd+Click on a piece of code and you're taken to its place on the output). The only things I miss are tabs to organize many open files and better project management.

        – Juan A. Navarro
        Jul 30 '10 at 6:08






      • 5





        I also used TeXShop, as it is a very clean and powerful editor with a great pdf viewer included. I abandoned it because I wanted code folding and a structure (tree) view for faster navigation in my large document and therefore now I use TexMakerX (tex.stackexchange.com/questions/339/latex-editors-ides/…) for my thesis (and TeXShop sometimes for smaller documents)

        – MostlyHarmless
        Apr 8 '11 at 18:30






      • 3





        Did they remove that feature? TeXShop used to support the use of an external editor!

        – cfr
        Dec 22 '13 at 0:33











      • I consider it a rather large drawback that TexShop is only available for Mac and not other platforms.

        – Peter Pablo
        Apr 22 '15 at 14:03











      • I use TexShop in combination with neoVim and some Latex and Snipmate Plugins. Works like a charm! There may not be an official "external editor" feature (idk), but you can open a main file with texshop and edit the content files with whatever editor you like.

        – mike
        Dec 7 '15 at 9:32














      • 9





        I also like TeXShop because you can have side by side source and pdf output, also with two-way synchronization between them (Cmd+Click on a piece of code and you're taken to its place on the output). The only things I miss are tabs to organize many open files and better project management.

        – Juan A. Navarro
        Jul 30 '10 at 6:08






      • 5





        I also used TeXShop, as it is a very clean and powerful editor with a great pdf viewer included. I abandoned it because I wanted code folding and a structure (tree) view for faster navigation in my large document and therefore now I use TexMakerX (tex.stackexchange.com/questions/339/latex-editors-ides/…) for my thesis (and TeXShop sometimes for smaller documents)

        – MostlyHarmless
        Apr 8 '11 at 18:30






      • 3





        Did they remove that feature? TeXShop used to support the use of an external editor!

        – cfr
        Dec 22 '13 at 0:33











      • I consider it a rather large drawback that TexShop is only available for Mac and not other platforms.

        – Peter Pablo
        Apr 22 '15 at 14:03











      • I use TexShop in combination with neoVim and some Latex and Snipmate Plugins. Works like a charm! There may not be an official "external editor" feature (idk), but you can open a main file with texshop and edit the content files with whatever editor you like.

        – mike
        Dec 7 '15 at 9:32








      9




      9





      I also like TeXShop because you can have side by side source and pdf output, also with two-way synchronization between them (Cmd+Click on a piece of code and you're taken to its place on the output). The only things I miss are tabs to organize many open files and better project management.

      – Juan A. Navarro
      Jul 30 '10 at 6:08





      I also like TeXShop because you can have side by side source and pdf output, also with two-way synchronization between them (Cmd+Click on a piece of code and you're taken to its place on the output). The only things I miss are tabs to organize many open files and better project management.

      – Juan A. Navarro
      Jul 30 '10 at 6:08




      5




      5





      I also used TeXShop, as it is a very clean and powerful editor with a great pdf viewer included. I abandoned it because I wanted code folding and a structure (tree) view for faster navigation in my large document and therefore now I use TexMakerX (tex.stackexchange.com/questions/339/latex-editors-ides/…) for my thesis (and TeXShop sometimes for smaller documents)

      – MostlyHarmless
      Apr 8 '11 at 18:30





      I also used TeXShop, as it is a very clean and powerful editor with a great pdf viewer included. I abandoned it because I wanted code folding and a structure (tree) view for faster navigation in my large document and therefore now I use TexMakerX (tex.stackexchange.com/questions/339/latex-editors-ides/…) for my thesis (and TeXShop sometimes for smaller documents)

      – MostlyHarmless
      Apr 8 '11 at 18:30




      3




      3





      Did they remove that feature? TeXShop used to support the use of an external editor!

      – cfr
      Dec 22 '13 at 0:33





      Did they remove that feature? TeXShop used to support the use of an external editor!

      – cfr
      Dec 22 '13 at 0:33













      I consider it a rather large drawback that TexShop is only available for Mac and not other platforms.

      – Peter Pablo
      Apr 22 '15 at 14:03





      I consider it a rather large drawback that TexShop is only available for Mac and not other platforms.

      – Peter Pablo
      Apr 22 '15 at 14:03













      I use TexShop in combination with neoVim and some Latex and Snipmate Plugins. Works like a charm! There may not be an official "external editor" feature (idk), but you can open a main file with texshop and edit the content files with whatever editor you like.

      – mike
      Dec 7 '15 at 9:32





      I use TexShop in combination with neoVim and some Latex and Snipmate Plugins. Works like a charm! There may not be an official "external editor" feature (idk), but you can open a main file with texshop and edit the content files with whatever editor you like.

      – mike
      Dec 7 '15 at 9:32











      99















      TeXnicCenter — texniccenter





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8/10

      • Open Source


      • Languages: English, German, more dictionaries for spelling control downloadable


      • Unicode: Yes (in version 2, which was released mid-september 2013).


      • RTL/bidi: ?


      • % !TEX directives: No


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable (also background colour)


      • Code Completion: Yes


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: No. You can config TeXnicCenter to use an external PDF viewer like Acrobat Reader or SumatraPDF with synchronized viewing.


      • Project Management: Yes




      I highly recommend TeXnicCenter. It stands out because it is the right mix between a GUI heavy editor (think Lyx) and no GUI (think emacs). Moreover, it is very easy to setup on Windows; and it integrates with MiKTeX without requiring extra configuration.



      An easy-to-navigate user interface provides a document tree, editor and compiling output as well as a vast array of drop-down menus:



      TeXnicCenter GUI
      Click image to enlarge



      Customizable profiles allow for manipulating of latex, bibtex and makeindex parameters, as well as post-processing features and viewer parameters (e.g. forward and backward search):



      TeXnicCenter profiles
      Click image to enlarge



      TeXnicCenter also allows to jump directly to the line that caused an error and provides code completion. TeXnicCenter has easy and integrated project management tools, and handles multiple files conveniently. It can be synchronized with pdf viewers such as Adobe Reader or SumatraPDF to provide forward and backward search options. Forward and backward search lets user jump and navigate between LaTeX code and pdf output seamlessly.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 2





        I've been using TeXnicCenter for years. It's great!

        – Rebekah
        Jul 27 '10 at 16:36











      • Yup, still using it. Don't see too much development on it lately, but I have an old installation together with MikTeX and works pretty well.

        – Leonardo Herrera
        Jul 27 '10 at 16:48






      • 2





        TeXnicCenter does not run on linux directly, but perhaps through wine?

        – fryguybob
        Jul 27 '10 at 16:49











      • @percusse It supports UTF-8 (or we jus got lucky with our 200+ page book and the Hungarian (magyar) accented characters áéíóöőúüű). :)

        – masu
        Oct 31 '13 at 9:09













      • @masu Thanks, removed the outdated comment

        – percusse
        Nov 2 '13 at 10:16
















      99















      TeXnicCenter — texniccenter





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8/10

      • Open Source


      • Languages: English, German, more dictionaries for spelling control downloadable


      • Unicode: Yes (in version 2, which was released mid-september 2013).


      • RTL/bidi: ?


      • % !TEX directives: No


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable (also background colour)


      • Code Completion: Yes


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: No. You can config TeXnicCenter to use an external PDF viewer like Acrobat Reader or SumatraPDF with synchronized viewing.


      • Project Management: Yes




      I highly recommend TeXnicCenter. It stands out because it is the right mix between a GUI heavy editor (think Lyx) and no GUI (think emacs). Moreover, it is very easy to setup on Windows; and it integrates with MiKTeX without requiring extra configuration.



      An easy-to-navigate user interface provides a document tree, editor and compiling output as well as a vast array of drop-down menus:



      TeXnicCenter GUI
      Click image to enlarge



      Customizable profiles allow for manipulating of latex, bibtex and makeindex parameters, as well as post-processing features and viewer parameters (e.g. forward and backward search):



      TeXnicCenter profiles
      Click image to enlarge



      TeXnicCenter also allows to jump directly to the line that caused an error and provides code completion. TeXnicCenter has easy and integrated project management tools, and handles multiple files conveniently. It can be synchronized with pdf viewers such as Adobe Reader or SumatraPDF to provide forward and backward search options. Forward and backward search lets user jump and navigate between LaTeX code and pdf output seamlessly.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 2





        I've been using TeXnicCenter for years. It's great!

        – Rebekah
        Jul 27 '10 at 16:36











      • Yup, still using it. Don't see too much development on it lately, but I have an old installation together with MikTeX and works pretty well.

        – Leonardo Herrera
        Jul 27 '10 at 16:48






      • 2





        TeXnicCenter does not run on linux directly, but perhaps through wine?

        – fryguybob
        Jul 27 '10 at 16:49











      • @percusse It supports UTF-8 (or we jus got lucky with our 200+ page book and the Hungarian (magyar) accented characters áéíóöőúüű). :)

        – masu
        Oct 31 '13 at 9:09













      • @masu Thanks, removed the outdated comment

        – percusse
        Nov 2 '13 at 10:16














      99












      99








      99








      TeXnicCenter — texniccenter





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8/10

      • Open Source


      • Languages: English, German, more dictionaries for spelling control downloadable


      • Unicode: Yes (in version 2, which was released mid-september 2013).


      • RTL/bidi: ?


      • % !TEX directives: No


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable (also background colour)


      • Code Completion: Yes


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: No. You can config TeXnicCenter to use an external PDF viewer like Acrobat Reader or SumatraPDF with synchronized viewing.


      • Project Management: Yes




      I highly recommend TeXnicCenter. It stands out because it is the right mix between a GUI heavy editor (think Lyx) and no GUI (think emacs). Moreover, it is very easy to setup on Windows; and it integrates with MiKTeX without requiring extra configuration.



      An easy-to-navigate user interface provides a document tree, editor and compiling output as well as a vast array of drop-down menus:



      TeXnicCenter GUI
      Click image to enlarge



      Customizable profiles allow for manipulating of latex, bibtex and makeindex parameters, as well as post-processing features and viewer parameters (e.g. forward and backward search):



      TeXnicCenter profiles
      Click image to enlarge



      TeXnicCenter also allows to jump directly to the line that caused an error and provides code completion. TeXnicCenter has easy and integrated project management tools, and handles multiple files conveniently. It can be synchronized with pdf viewers such as Adobe Reader or SumatraPDF to provide forward and backward search options. Forward and backward search lets user jump and navigate between LaTeX code and pdf output seamlessly.






      share|improve this answer
















      TeXnicCenter — texniccenter





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8/10

      • Open Source


      • Languages: English, German, more dictionaries for spelling control downloadable


      • Unicode: Yes (in version 2, which was released mid-september 2013).


      • RTL/bidi: ?


      • % !TEX directives: No


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable (also background colour)


      • Code Completion: Yes


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: No. You can config TeXnicCenter to use an external PDF viewer like Acrobat Reader or SumatraPDF with synchronized viewing.


      • Project Management: Yes




      I highly recommend TeXnicCenter. It stands out because it is the right mix between a GUI heavy editor (think Lyx) and no GUI (think emacs). Moreover, it is very easy to setup on Windows; and it integrates with MiKTeX without requiring extra configuration.



      An easy-to-navigate user interface provides a document tree, editor and compiling output as well as a vast array of drop-down menus:



      TeXnicCenter GUI
      Click image to enlarge



      Customizable profiles allow for manipulating of latex, bibtex and makeindex parameters, as well as post-processing features and viewer parameters (e.g. forward and backward search):



      TeXnicCenter profiles
      Click image to enlarge



      TeXnicCenter also allows to jump directly to the line that caused an error and provides code completion. TeXnicCenter has easy and integrated project management tools, and handles multiple files conveniently. It can be synchronized with pdf viewers such as Adobe Reader or SumatraPDF to provide forward and backward search options. Forward and backward search lets user jump and navigate between LaTeX code and pdf output seamlessly.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Oct 31 '15 at 6:19


























      community wiki





      18 revs, 9 users 22%
      doncherry









      • 2





        I've been using TeXnicCenter for years. It's great!

        – Rebekah
        Jul 27 '10 at 16:36











      • Yup, still using it. Don't see too much development on it lately, but I have an old installation together with MikTeX and works pretty well.

        – Leonardo Herrera
        Jul 27 '10 at 16:48






      • 2





        TeXnicCenter does not run on linux directly, but perhaps through wine?

        – fryguybob
        Jul 27 '10 at 16:49











      • @percusse It supports UTF-8 (or we jus got lucky with our 200+ page book and the Hungarian (magyar) accented characters áéíóöőúüű). :)

        – masu
        Oct 31 '13 at 9:09













      • @masu Thanks, removed the outdated comment

        – percusse
        Nov 2 '13 at 10:16














      • 2





        I've been using TeXnicCenter for years. It's great!

        – Rebekah
        Jul 27 '10 at 16:36











      • Yup, still using it. Don't see too much development on it lately, but I have an old installation together with MikTeX and works pretty well.

        – Leonardo Herrera
        Jul 27 '10 at 16:48






      • 2





        TeXnicCenter does not run on linux directly, but perhaps through wine?

        – fryguybob
        Jul 27 '10 at 16:49











      • @percusse It supports UTF-8 (or we jus got lucky with our 200+ page book and the Hungarian (magyar) accented characters áéíóöőúüű). :)

        – masu
        Oct 31 '13 at 9:09













      • @masu Thanks, removed the outdated comment

        – percusse
        Nov 2 '13 at 10:16








      2




      2





      I've been using TeXnicCenter for years. It's great!

      – Rebekah
      Jul 27 '10 at 16:36





      I've been using TeXnicCenter for years. It's great!

      – Rebekah
      Jul 27 '10 at 16:36













      Yup, still using it. Don't see too much development on it lately, but I have an old installation together with MikTeX and works pretty well.

      – Leonardo Herrera
      Jul 27 '10 at 16:48





      Yup, still using it. Don't see too much development on it lately, but I have an old installation together with MikTeX and works pretty well.

      – Leonardo Herrera
      Jul 27 '10 at 16:48




      2




      2





      TeXnicCenter does not run on linux directly, but perhaps through wine?

      – fryguybob
      Jul 27 '10 at 16:49





      TeXnicCenter does not run on linux directly, but perhaps through wine?

      – fryguybob
      Jul 27 '10 at 16:49













      @percusse It supports UTF-8 (or we jus got lucky with our 200+ page book and the Hungarian (magyar) accented characters áéíóöőúüű). :)

      – masu
      Oct 31 '13 at 9:09







      @percusse It supports UTF-8 (or we jus got lucky with our 200+ page book and the Hungarian (magyar) accented characters áéíóöőúüű). :)

      – masu
      Oct 31 '13 at 9:09















      @masu Thanks, removed the outdated comment

      – percusse
      Nov 2 '13 at 10:16





      @masu Thanks, removed the outdated comment

      – percusse
      Nov 2 '13 at 10:16











      95















      ShareLaTeX - Online LaTeX editor in your web browser.



      Note: The companies behind ShareLaTeX and Overleaf have merged, and as such the two services will at some point in the future be merged into one. See https://www.overleaf.com/blog/518-exciting-news-sharelatex-is-joining-overleaf#.Wa_pdL8hWV4.




      • Unlimited projects for free

      • latex, pdflatex and XeLaTeX compilers

      • Collaborate with others, see what they are typing in real time like Google documents

      • Auto Complete

      • Multi Language spell check

      • Chat with online collaborators

      • Export and import data

      • Sync with Dropbox

      • Regular snapshots allowing for rolling back

      • Vim and Emacs Bindings

      • Custom Themes

      • Extensive inbuilt template library

      • It's Open Source, so you can install it on your own server


      See other peoples cursors



      command auto complete



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer





















      • 3





        The only decent option if you run Chrome OS

        – DavidR
        Dec 5 '13 at 11:38






      • 9





        I can't understand why this doesn't have more +1's! I've ceased using installed LaTeX programs entirely since finding ShareLaTeX. I can edit the same document from any device I own, even my phone if I'm in a bind. (It's a shame they don't have an app yet; their site, admittedly, just barely works on a phone.)

        – Jonathan Landrum
        Apr 4 '14 at 13:59











      • related: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/3/compiling-documents-online

        – matth
        Jul 3 '15 at 8:31






      • 2





        ShareLaTeX has the shortcoming that its TeX distribution is only periodically updated, but has the advantages of a very well done documentation, with a lot of straightforward and useful examples for beginners, and of an excellent customer assistance.

        – CarLaTeX
        Feb 15 '17 at 10:53











      • Moreover, it is open source so you can also spin up a local version of it which means you don't need internet.

        – Melvin Roest
        Apr 4 '18 at 17:11
















      95















      ShareLaTeX - Online LaTeX editor in your web browser.



      Note: The companies behind ShareLaTeX and Overleaf have merged, and as such the two services will at some point in the future be merged into one. See https://www.overleaf.com/blog/518-exciting-news-sharelatex-is-joining-overleaf#.Wa_pdL8hWV4.




      • Unlimited projects for free

      • latex, pdflatex and XeLaTeX compilers

      • Collaborate with others, see what they are typing in real time like Google documents

      • Auto Complete

      • Multi Language spell check

      • Chat with online collaborators

      • Export and import data

      • Sync with Dropbox

      • Regular snapshots allowing for rolling back

      • Vim and Emacs Bindings

      • Custom Themes

      • Extensive inbuilt template library

      • It's Open Source, so you can install it on your own server


      See other peoples cursors



      command auto complete



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer





















      • 3





        The only decent option if you run Chrome OS

        – DavidR
        Dec 5 '13 at 11:38






      • 9





        I can't understand why this doesn't have more +1's! I've ceased using installed LaTeX programs entirely since finding ShareLaTeX. I can edit the same document from any device I own, even my phone if I'm in a bind. (It's a shame they don't have an app yet; their site, admittedly, just barely works on a phone.)

        – Jonathan Landrum
        Apr 4 '14 at 13:59











      • related: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/3/compiling-documents-online

        – matth
        Jul 3 '15 at 8:31






      • 2





        ShareLaTeX has the shortcoming that its TeX distribution is only periodically updated, but has the advantages of a very well done documentation, with a lot of straightforward and useful examples for beginners, and of an excellent customer assistance.

        – CarLaTeX
        Feb 15 '17 at 10:53











      • Moreover, it is open source so you can also spin up a local version of it which means you don't need internet.

        – Melvin Roest
        Apr 4 '18 at 17:11














      95












      95








      95








      ShareLaTeX - Online LaTeX editor in your web browser.



      Note: The companies behind ShareLaTeX and Overleaf have merged, and as such the two services will at some point in the future be merged into one. See https://www.overleaf.com/blog/518-exciting-news-sharelatex-is-joining-overleaf#.Wa_pdL8hWV4.




      • Unlimited projects for free

      • latex, pdflatex and XeLaTeX compilers

      • Collaborate with others, see what they are typing in real time like Google documents

      • Auto Complete

      • Multi Language spell check

      • Chat with online collaborators

      • Export and import data

      • Sync with Dropbox

      • Regular snapshots allowing for rolling back

      • Vim and Emacs Bindings

      • Custom Themes

      • Extensive inbuilt template library

      • It's Open Source, so you can install it on your own server


      See other peoples cursors



      command auto complete



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer
















      ShareLaTeX - Online LaTeX editor in your web browser.



      Note: The companies behind ShareLaTeX and Overleaf have merged, and as such the two services will at some point in the future be merged into one. See https://www.overleaf.com/blog/518-exciting-news-sharelatex-is-joining-overleaf#.Wa_pdL8hWV4.




      • Unlimited projects for free

      • latex, pdflatex and XeLaTeX compilers

      • Collaborate with others, see what they are typing in real time like Google documents

      • Auto Complete

      • Multi Language spell check

      • Chat with online collaborators

      • Export and import data

      • Sync with Dropbox

      • Regular snapshots allowing for rolling back

      • Vim and Emacs Bindings

      • Custom Themes

      • Extensive inbuilt template library

      • It's Open Source, so you can install it on your own server


      See other peoples cursors



      command auto complete



      enter image description here







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Sep 6 '17 at 12:26


























      community wiki





      4 revs, 3 users 82%
      henry.oswald









      • 3





        The only decent option if you run Chrome OS

        – DavidR
        Dec 5 '13 at 11:38






      • 9





        I can't understand why this doesn't have more +1's! I've ceased using installed LaTeX programs entirely since finding ShareLaTeX. I can edit the same document from any device I own, even my phone if I'm in a bind. (It's a shame they don't have an app yet; their site, admittedly, just barely works on a phone.)

        – Jonathan Landrum
        Apr 4 '14 at 13:59











      • related: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/3/compiling-documents-online

        – matth
        Jul 3 '15 at 8:31






      • 2





        ShareLaTeX has the shortcoming that its TeX distribution is only periodically updated, but has the advantages of a very well done documentation, with a lot of straightforward and useful examples for beginners, and of an excellent customer assistance.

        – CarLaTeX
        Feb 15 '17 at 10:53











      • Moreover, it is open source so you can also spin up a local version of it which means you don't need internet.

        – Melvin Roest
        Apr 4 '18 at 17:11














      • 3





        The only decent option if you run Chrome OS

        – DavidR
        Dec 5 '13 at 11:38






      • 9





        I can't understand why this doesn't have more +1's! I've ceased using installed LaTeX programs entirely since finding ShareLaTeX. I can edit the same document from any device I own, even my phone if I'm in a bind. (It's a shame they don't have an app yet; their site, admittedly, just barely works on a phone.)

        – Jonathan Landrum
        Apr 4 '14 at 13:59











      • related: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/3/compiling-documents-online

        – matth
        Jul 3 '15 at 8:31






      • 2





        ShareLaTeX has the shortcoming that its TeX distribution is only periodically updated, but has the advantages of a very well done documentation, with a lot of straightforward and useful examples for beginners, and of an excellent customer assistance.

        – CarLaTeX
        Feb 15 '17 at 10:53











      • Moreover, it is open source so you can also spin up a local version of it which means you don't need internet.

        – Melvin Roest
        Apr 4 '18 at 17:11








      3




      3





      The only decent option if you run Chrome OS

      – DavidR
      Dec 5 '13 at 11:38





      The only decent option if you run Chrome OS

      – DavidR
      Dec 5 '13 at 11:38




      9




      9





      I can't understand why this doesn't have more +1's! I've ceased using installed LaTeX programs entirely since finding ShareLaTeX. I can edit the same document from any device I own, even my phone if I'm in a bind. (It's a shame they don't have an app yet; their site, admittedly, just barely works on a phone.)

      – Jonathan Landrum
      Apr 4 '14 at 13:59





      I can't understand why this doesn't have more +1's! I've ceased using installed LaTeX programs entirely since finding ShareLaTeX. I can edit the same document from any device I own, even my phone if I'm in a bind. (It's a shame they don't have an app yet; their site, admittedly, just barely works on a phone.)

      – Jonathan Landrum
      Apr 4 '14 at 13:59













      related: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/3/compiling-documents-online

      – matth
      Jul 3 '15 at 8:31





      related: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/3/compiling-documents-online

      – matth
      Jul 3 '15 at 8:31




      2




      2





      ShareLaTeX has the shortcoming that its TeX distribution is only periodically updated, but has the advantages of a very well done documentation, with a lot of straightforward and useful examples for beginners, and of an excellent customer assistance.

      – CarLaTeX
      Feb 15 '17 at 10:53





      ShareLaTeX has the shortcoming that its TeX distribution is only periodically updated, but has the advantages of a very well done documentation, with a lot of straightforward and useful examples for beginners, and of an excellent customer assistance.

      – CarLaTeX
      Feb 15 '17 at 10:53













      Moreover, it is open source so you can also spin up a local version of it which means you don't need internet.

      – Melvin Roest
      Apr 4 '18 at 17:11





      Moreover, it is open source so you can also spin up a local version of it which means you don't need internet.

      – Melvin Roest
      Apr 4 '18 at 17:11











      94














      LyX



      Available for: Windows, Mac, and Linux

      Open Source





      I use LyX and I love it. From the webpage:




      LyX is a document processor that encourages an approach to writing based on the structure of your documents (WYSIWYM) and not simply their appearance (WYSIWYG).
      LyX combines the power and flexibility of TeX/LaTeX with the ease of use of a graphical interface. This results in world-class support for creation of mathematical content (via a fully integrated equation editor) and structured documents like academic articles, theses, and books. In addition, staples of scientific authoring such as reference list and index creation come standard. But you can also use LyX to create a letter or a novel or a theatre play or film script. A broad array of ready, well-designed document layouts are built in.




      Quite intuitive and user-friendly, and it is possible to import from and (more importantly) export to LaTeX.



      Too many useful features to mention, but I'll mention one that I find extra good: If you want to typeset a "2-dimensional" math expression, LyX is the way to go. I have used LyX for nearly ten years. Switched to AUCTeX recently, but I still use LyX whenever I want to get the LaTeX code for a complicated math expression.



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer





















      • 25





        The thing I don't like about LyX (or WYSIWYG-ish in general) is that it puts an emphasis format (that's all you see!) rather than content structure (which is hidden behind the format). LaTeX code does it the other way around, the structure is explicit and this helps you focus on the content rather than the format of your document.

        – Juan A. Navarro
        Jul 30 '10 at 6:01








      • 17





        I really don't like LyX, but I don't think that this is grounds to downvote you :)

        – Vivi
        Jul 30 '10 at 7:40






      • 60





        I really do like LyX, but: LyX is not an LaTeX Editor and we really, really should stop selling it as such! LyX is a document system in its own respect with an own document format, it just uses LaTeX as (one) backend. So every LyX document can be exported to LaTeX, but not every LaTeX document can be imported into LyX (even though simple stuff works pretty well). If collaborating on some document, all or no authors have to use LyX. This, by definition, does not qualify LyX as an "editor".

        – Daniel
        Jan 4 '12 at 9:22








      • 11





        @JuanA.Navarro Interesting, I feel exactly the other way around. When looking at raw LaTeX code, I find it hard to focus on the content, since it is mixed with the structure and formatting aspects of the document. Also, the displaying of chapter and section titles in big, bold fonts (instead of the same way as normal text) makes it much easier for me to understand and modify the structure of my document.

        – rolve
        Apr 9 '13 at 13:43






      • 3





        @rolve, it all depends on how you tend to write your code. I have seen very messy code mixing content/formatting within the body of the document, but by using semantically defined commands you can make the distinction very explicit.

        – Juan A. Navarro
        Apr 9 '13 at 17:59
















      94














      LyX



      Available for: Windows, Mac, and Linux

      Open Source





      I use LyX and I love it. From the webpage:




      LyX is a document processor that encourages an approach to writing based on the structure of your documents (WYSIWYM) and not simply their appearance (WYSIWYG).
      LyX combines the power and flexibility of TeX/LaTeX with the ease of use of a graphical interface. This results in world-class support for creation of mathematical content (via a fully integrated equation editor) and structured documents like academic articles, theses, and books. In addition, staples of scientific authoring such as reference list and index creation come standard. But you can also use LyX to create a letter or a novel or a theatre play or film script. A broad array of ready, well-designed document layouts are built in.




      Quite intuitive and user-friendly, and it is possible to import from and (more importantly) export to LaTeX.



      Too many useful features to mention, but I'll mention one that I find extra good: If you want to typeset a "2-dimensional" math expression, LyX is the way to go. I have used LyX for nearly ten years. Switched to AUCTeX recently, but I still use LyX whenever I want to get the LaTeX code for a complicated math expression.



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer





















      • 25





        The thing I don't like about LyX (or WYSIWYG-ish in general) is that it puts an emphasis format (that's all you see!) rather than content structure (which is hidden behind the format). LaTeX code does it the other way around, the structure is explicit and this helps you focus on the content rather than the format of your document.

        – Juan A. Navarro
        Jul 30 '10 at 6:01








      • 17





        I really don't like LyX, but I don't think that this is grounds to downvote you :)

        – Vivi
        Jul 30 '10 at 7:40






      • 60





        I really do like LyX, but: LyX is not an LaTeX Editor and we really, really should stop selling it as such! LyX is a document system in its own respect with an own document format, it just uses LaTeX as (one) backend. So every LyX document can be exported to LaTeX, but not every LaTeX document can be imported into LyX (even though simple stuff works pretty well). If collaborating on some document, all or no authors have to use LyX. This, by definition, does not qualify LyX as an "editor".

        – Daniel
        Jan 4 '12 at 9:22








      • 11





        @JuanA.Navarro Interesting, I feel exactly the other way around. When looking at raw LaTeX code, I find it hard to focus on the content, since it is mixed with the structure and formatting aspects of the document. Also, the displaying of chapter and section titles in big, bold fonts (instead of the same way as normal text) makes it much easier for me to understand and modify the structure of my document.

        – rolve
        Apr 9 '13 at 13:43






      • 3





        @rolve, it all depends on how you tend to write your code. I have seen very messy code mixing content/formatting within the body of the document, but by using semantically defined commands you can make the distinction very explicit.

        – Juan A. Navarro
        Apr 9 '13 at 17:59














      94












      94








      94







      LyX



      Available for: Windows, Mac, and Linux

      Open Source





      I use LyX and I love it. From the webpage:




      LyX is a document processor that encourages an approach to writing based on the structure of your documents (WYSIWYM) and not simply their appearance (WYSIWYG).
      LyX combines the power and flexibility of TeX/LaTeX with the ease of use of a graphical interface. This results in world-class support for creation of mathematical content (via a fully integrated equation editor) and structured documents like academic articles, theses, and books. In addition, staples of scientific authoring such as reference list and index creation come standard. But you can also use LyX to create a letter or a novel or a theatre play or film script. A broad array of ready, well-designed document layouts are built in.




      Quite intuitive and user-friendly, and it is possible to import from and (more importantly) export to LaTeX.



      Too many useful features to mention, but I'll mention one that I find extra good: If you want to typeset a "2-dimensional" math expression, LyX is the way to go. I have used LyX for nearly ten years. Switched to AUCTeX recently, but I still use LyX whenever I want to get the LaTeX code for a complicated math expression.



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer















      LyX



      Available for: Windows, Mac, and Linux

      Open Source





      I use LyX and I love it. From the webpage:




      LyX is a document processor that encourages an approach to writing based on the structure of your documents (WYSIWYM) and not simply their appearance (WYSIWYG).
      LyX combines the power and flexibility of TeX/LaTeX with the ease of use of a graphical interface. This results in world-class support for creation of mathematical content (via a fully integrated equation editor) and structured documents like academic articles, theses, and books. In addition, staples of scientific authoring such as reference list and index creation come standard. But you can also use LyX to create a letter or a novel or a theatre play or film script. A broad array of ready, well-designed document layouts are built in.




      Quite intuitive and user-friendly, and it is possible to import from and (more importantly) export to LaTeX.



      Too many useful features to mention, but I'll mention one that I find extra good: If you want to typeset a "2-dimensional" math expression, LyX is the way to go. I have used LyX for nearly ten years. Switched to AUCTeX recently, but I still use LyX whenever I want to get the LaTeX code for a complicated math expression.



      enter image description here







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Sep 28 '12 at 4:41


























      community wiki





      4 revs, 4 users 35%
      Caramdir










      • 25





        The thing I don't like about LyX (or WYSIWYG-ish in general) is that it puts an emphasis format (that's all you see!) rather than content structure (which is hidden behind the format). LaTeX code does it the other way around, the structure is explicit and this helps you focus on the content rather than the format of your document.

        – Juan A. Navarro
        Jul 30 '10 at 6:01








      • 17





        I really don't like LyX, but I don't think that this is grounds to downvote you :)

        – Vivi
        Jul 30 '10 at 7:40






      • 60





        I really do like LyX, but: LyX is not an LaTeX Editor and we really, really should stop selling it as such! LyX is a document system in its own respect with an own document format, it just uses LaTeX as (one) backend. So every LyX document can be exported to LaTeX, but not every LaTeX document can be imported into LyX (even though simple stuff works pretty well). If collaborating on some document, all or no authors have to use LyX. This, by definition, does not qualify LyX as an "editor".

        – Daniel
        Jan 4 '12 at 9:22








      • 11





        @JuanA.Navarro Interesting, I feel exactly the other way around. When looking at raw LaTeX code, I find it hard to focus on the content, since it is mixed with the structure and formatting aspects of the document. Also, the displaying of chapter and section titles in big, bold fonts (instead of the same way as normal text) makes it much easier for me to understand and modify the structure of my document.

        – rolve
        Apr 9 '13 at 13:43






      • 3





        @rolve, it all depends on how you tend to write your code. I have seen very messy code mixing content/formatting within the body of the document, but by using semantically defined commands you can make the distinction very explicit.

        – Juan A. Navarro
        Apr 9 '13 at 17:59














      • 25





        The thing I don't like about LyX (or WYSIWYG-ish in general) is that it puts an emphasis format (that's all you see!) rather than content structure (which is hidden behind the format). LaTeX code does it the other way around, the structure is explicit and this helps you focus on the content rather than the format of your document.

        – Juan A. Navarro
        Jul 30 '10 at 6:01








      • 17





        I really don't like LyX, but I don't think that this is grounds to downvote you :)

        – Vivi
        Jul 30 '10 at 7:40






      • 60





        I really do like LyX, but: LyX is not an LaTeX Editor and we really, really should stop selling it as such! LyX is a document system in its own respect with an own document format, it just uses LaTeX as (one) backend. So every LyX document can be exported to LaTeX, but not every LaTeX document can be imported into LyX (even though simple stuff works pretty well). If collaborating on some document, all or no authors have to use LyX. This, by definition, does not qualify LyX as an "editor".

        – Daniel
        Jan 4 '12 at 9:22








      • 11





        @JuanA.Navarro Interesting, I feel exactly the other way around. When looking at raw LaTeX code, I find it hard to focus on the content, since it is mixed with the structure and formatting aspects of the document. Also, the displaying of chapter and section titles in big, bold fonts (instead of the same way as normal text) makes it much easier for me to understand and modify the structure of my document.

        – rolve
        Apr 9 '13 at 13:43






      • 3





        @rolve, it all depends on how you tend to write your code. I have seen very messy code mixing content/formatting within the body of the document, but by using semantically defined commands you can make the distinction very explicit.

        – Juan A. Navarro
        Apr 9 '13 at 17:59








      25




      25





      The thing I don't like about LyX (or WYSIWYG-ish in general) is that it puts an emphasis format (that's all you see!) rather than content structure (which is hidden behind the format). LaTeX code does it the other way around, the structure is explicit and this helps you focus on the content rather than the format of your document.

      – Juan A. Navarro
      Jul 30 '10 at 6:01







      The thing I don't like about LyX (or WYSIWYG-ish in general) is that it puts an emphasis format (that's all you see!) rather than content structure (which is hidden behind the format). LaTeX code does it the other way around, the structure is explicit and this helps you focus on the content rather than the format of your document.

      – Juan A. Navarro
      Jul 30 '10 at 6:01






      17




      17





      I really don't like LyX, but I don't think that this is grounds to downvote you :)

      – Vivi
      Jul 30 '10 at 7:40





      I really don't like LyX, but I don't think that this is grounds to downvote you :)

      – Vivi
      Jul 30 '10 at 7:40




      60




      60





      I really do like LyX, but: LyX is not an LaTeX Editor and we really, really should stop selling it as such! LyX is a document system in its own respect with an own document format, it just uses LaTeX as (one) backend. So every LyX document can be exported to LaTeX, but not every LaTeX document can be imported into LyX (even though simple stuff works pretty well). If collaborating on some document, all or no authors have to use LyX. This, by definition, does not qualify LyX as an "editor".

      – Daniel
      Jan 4 '12 at 9:22







      I really do like LyX, but: LyX is not an LaTeX Editor and we really, really should stop selling it as such! LyX is a document system in its own respect with an own document format, it just uses LaTeX as (one) backend. So every LyX document can be exported to LaTeX, but not every LaTeX document can be imported into LyX (even though simple stuff works pretty well). If collaborating on some document, all or no authors have to use LyX. This, by definition, does not qualify LyX as an "editor".

      – Daniel
      Jan 4 '12 at 9:22






      11




      11





      @JuanA.Navarro Interesting, I feel exactly the other way around. When looking at raw LaTeX code, I find it hard to focus on the content, since it is mixed with the structure and formatting aspects of the document. Also, the displaying of chapter and section titles in big, bold fonts (instead of the same way as normal text) makes it much easier for me to understand and modify the structure of my document.

      – rolve
      Apr 9 '13 at 13:43





      @JuanA.Navarro Interesting, I feel exactly the other way around. When looking at raw LaTeX code, I find it hard to focus on the content, since it is mixed with the structure and formatting aspects of the document. Also, the displaying of chapter and section titles in big, bold fonts (instead of the same way as normal text) makes it much easier for me to understand and modify the structure of my document.

      – rolve
      Apr 9 '13 at 13:43




      3




      3





      @rolve, it all depends on how you tend to write your code. I have seen very messy code mixing content/formatting within the body of the document, but by using semantically defined commands you can make the distinction very explicit.

      – Juan A. Navarro
      Apr 9 '13 at 17:59





      @rolve, it all depends on how you tend to write your code. I have seen very messy code mixing content/formatting within the body of the document, but by using semantically defined commands you can make the distinction very explicit.

      – Juan A. Navarro
      Apr 9 '13 at 17:59











      71















      WinEdt — winedt





      • Platforms: (Windows XP until version 9.1)/Vista/7/8/10


      • License: Shareware, personal license $60


      • Languages: en


      • Unicode: Yes (from version 7)


      • RTL/bidi: Yes (from version 10)


      • % !TEX directives: Probably possible.


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable and including a .dtx mode


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code Folding: Yes, customizable (from version 8)


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes with appropriate PDF viewer (e.g. SumatraPDF)


      • Built-in Output Viewer: No


      • Project Management: Yes, own project management system and outliner




      A lot of useful add-ons for WinEdt can be found on the WinEdt's Community site





      enter image description here



      WinEdt is a good option on Windows.



      I wrote a post on some of the features I liked in WinEdt 6.0.
      To summarise:




      • Tree View can be customised

      • Automatically display your current location in TOC

      • Colour coding that aids usability

      • Intelligent defaults

      • Options to customise almost anything

      • Easy configuration interface with MikTeX

      • One click build process for LaTeX documents

      • Intuitive default shortcut keys and intuitive alt menu letters


      It's not free, but it's also not that expensive.



      WinEdt's new full Unicode support and its translation tables allow to show ∀α in the screen but to write {forall}{alpha} in the disk.






      share|improve this answer


























      • @percusse I enjoyed learning LaTeX with WinEdt, but I found that eventually I wanted a true programmer's editor that I could use for a broader range of editing tasks. I know use Vim.

        – Jeromy Anglim
        Aug 22 '11 at 10:40






      • 1





        BTW: DANTE members get a nice discount on the editor: dante.de/index/Intern/WinEdt.html (German)

        – topskip
        Mar 19 '12 at 20:18






      • 2





        I would add search/inverse search possibility - you can jump to the place in the rendered file which you are currently editing, and, more importantly, jump from the place in the dvi file which you are currently reviewing to its TeX code.

        – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
        Mar 19 '14 at 4:59
















      71















      WinEdt — winedt





      • Platforms: (Windows XP until version 9.1)/Vista/7/8/10


      • License: Shareware, personal license $60


      • Languages: en


      • Unicode: Yes (from version 7)


      • RTL/bidi: Yes (from version 10)


      • % !TEX directives: Probably possible.


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable and including a .dtx mode


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code Folding: Yes, customizable (from version 8)


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes with appropriate PDF viewer (e.g. SumatraPDF)


      • Built-in Output Viewer: No


      • Project Management: Yes, own project management system and outliner




      A lot of useful add-ons for WinEdt can be found on the WinEdt's Community site





      enter image description here



      WinEdt is a good option on Windows.



      I wrote a post on some of the features I liked in WinEdt 6.0.
      To summarise:




      • Tree View can be customised

      • Automatically display your current location in TOC

      • Colour coding that aids usability

      • Intelligent defaults

      • Options to customise almost anything

      • Easy configuration interface with MikTeX

      • One click build process for LaTeX documents

      • Intuitive default shortcut keys and intuitive alt menu letters


      It's not free, but it's also not that expensive.



      WinEdt's new full Unicode support and its translation tables allow to show ∀α in the screen but to write {forall}{alpha} in the disk.






      share|improve this answer


























      • @percusse I enjoyed learning LaTeX with WinEdt, but I found that eventually I wanted a true programmer's editor that I could use for a broader range of editing tasks. I know use Vim.

        – Jeromy Anglim
        Aug 22 '11 at 10:40






      • 1





        BTW: DANTE members get a nice discount on the editor: dante.de/index/Intern/WinEdt.html (German)

        – topskip
        Mar 19 '12 at 20:18






      • 2





        I would add search/inverse search possibility - you can jump to the place in the rendered file which you are currently editing, and, more importantly, jump from the place in the dvi file which you are currently reviewing to its TeX code.

        – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
        Mar 19 '14 at 4:59














      71












      71








      71








      WinEdt — winedt





      • Platforms: (Windows XP until version 9.1)/Vista/7/8/10


      • License: Shareware, personal license $60


      • Languages: en


      • Unicode: Yes (from version 7)


      • RTL/bidi: Yes (from version 10)


      • % !TEX directives: Probably possible.


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable and including a .dtx mode


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code Folding: Yes, customizable (from version 8)


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes with appropriate PDF viewer (e.g. SumatraPDF)


      • Built-in Output Viewer: No


      • Project Management: Yes, own project management system and outliner




      A lot of useful add-ons for WinEdt can be found on the WinEdt's Community site





      enter image description here



      WinEdt is a good option on Windows.



      I wrote a post on some of the features I liked in WinEdt 6.0.
      To summarise:




      • Tree View can be customised

      • Automatically display your current location in TOC

      • Colour coding that aids usability

      • Intelligent defaults

      • Options to customise almost anything

      • Easy configuration interface with MikTeX

      • One click build process for LaTeX documents

      • Intuitive default shortcut keys and intuitive alt menu letters


      It's not free, but it's also not that expensive.



      WinEdt's new full Unicode support and its translation tables allow to show ∀α in the screen but to write {forall}{alpha} in the disk.






      share|improve this answer
















      WinEdt — winedt





      • Platforms: (Windows XP until version 9.1)/Vista/7/8/10


      • License: Shareware, personal license $60


      • Languages: en


      • Unicode: Yes (from version 7)


      • RTL/bidi: Yes (from version 10)


      • % !TEX directives: Probably possible.


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable and including a .dtx mode


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code Folding: Yes, customizable (from version 8)


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes with appropriate PDF viewer (e.g. SumatraPDF)


      • Built-in Output Viewer: No


      • Project Management: Yes, own project management system and outliner




      A lot of useful add-ons for WinEdt can be found on the WinEdt's Community site





      enter image description here



      WinEdt is a good option on Windows.



      I wrote a post on some of the features I liked in WinEdt 6.0.
      To summarise:




      • Tree View can be customised

      • Automatically display your current location in TOC

      • Colour coding that aids usability

      • Intelligent defaults

      • Options to customise almost anything

      • Easy configuration interface with MikTeX

      • One click build process for LaTeX documents

      • Intuitive default shortcut keys and intuitive alt menu letters


      It's not free, but it's also not that expensive.



      WinEdt's new full Unicode support and its translation tables allow to show ∀α in the screen but to write {forall}{alpha} in the disk.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Mar 18 '17 at 10:55


























      community wiki





      17 revs, 12 users 31%
      Jeromy Anglim














      • @percusse I enjoyed learning LaTeX with WinEdt, but I found that eventually I wanted a true programmer's editor that I could use for a broader range of editing tasks. I know use Vim.

        – Jeromy Anglim
        Aug 22 '11 at 10:40






      • 1





        BTW: DANTE members get a nice discount on the editor: dante.de/index/Intern/WinEdt.html (German)

        – topskip
        Mar 19 '12 at 20:18






      • 2





        I would add search/inverse search possibility - you can jump to the place in the rendered file which you are currently editing, and, more importantly, jump from the place in the dvi file which you are currently reviewing to its TeX code.

        – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
        Mar 19 '14 at 4:59



















      • @percusse I enjoyed learning LaTeX with WinEdt, but I found that eventually I wanted a true programmer's editor that I could use for a broader range of editing tasks. I know use Vim.

        – Jeromy Anglim
        Aug 22 '11 at 10:40






      • 1





        BTW: DANTE members get a nice discount on the editor: dante.de/index/Intern/WinEdt.html (German)

        – topskip
        Mar 19 '12 at 20:18






      • 2





        I would add search/inverse search possibility - you can jump to the place in the rendered file which you are currently editing, and, more importantly, jump from the place in the dvi file which you are currently reviewing to its TeX code.

        – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
        Mar 19 '14 at 4:59

















      @percusse I enjoyed learning LaTeX with WinEdt, but I found that eventually I wanted a true programmer's editor that I could use for a broader range of editing tasks. I know use Vim.

      – Jeromy Anglim
      Aug 22 '11 at 10:40





      @percusse I enjoyed learning LaTeX with WinEdt, but I found that eventually I wanted a true programmer's editor that I could use for a broader range of editing tasks. I know use Vim.

      – Jeromy Anglim
      Aug 22 '11 at 10:40




      1




      1





      BTW: DANTE members get a nice discount on the editor: dante.de/index/Intern/WinEdt.html (German)

      – topskip
      Mar 19 '12 at 20:18





      BTW: DANTE members get a nice discount on the editor: dante.de/index/Intern/WinEdt.html (German)

      – topskip
      Mar 19 '12 at 20:18




      2




      2





      I would add search/inverse search possibility - you can jump to the place in the rendered file which you are currently editing, and, more importantly, jump from the place in the dvi file which you are currently reviewing to its TeX code.

      – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
      Mar 19 '14 at 4:59





      I would add search/inverse search possibility - you can jump to the place in the rendered file which you are currently editing, and, more importantly, jump from the place in the dvi file which you are currently reviewing to its TeX code.

      – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
      Mar 19 '14 at 4:59











      58














      TeXlipse



      Available for: Windows, Mac, Linux and others (Java based)

      Open Source





      I've been happily using TeXlipse in Eclipse for a long time, it has integrated code completion (including BibTeX entries), customizable templates, an outline view - and being integrated into Eclipse it includes all useful stuff I'm used to when working in Eclipse, like editor shortcuts, version control, etc.



      There is also an Eclipse pdf viewer plugin Pdf4Eclipse with complete support of SyncTeX, which allows forward and reverse search in LaTeX documents. Since TeXlipse rebuilds the LaTeX sources automatically (in background) after a save, the code and the preview of the document are always synchronized.



      Example of TeXlipse together with Pdf4Eclipse
      Click image to enlarge






      share|improve this answer





















      • 3





        Does TeXlipse / Eclipse compile the documents well? Including running pdflatex and bibtex multiple times?

        – Dima
        Jul 27 '10 at 15:04






      • 8





        It's probably worth mentioning that Eclipse might not be the best choice to install as a TeX-only IDE if you don't already have it, just because it's rather large and has many features that aren't needed to write up an assignment, for example.

        – Michael Underwood
        Jul 27 '10 at 20:11






      • 3





        One plugin that is almost essential for PhD writers is integrated SVN/GIT backup using subclipse/eGit. Every edit is retrievable and can be stored in the cloud. There's enough horror stories on the net about losing one's thesis because of a hard-drive failure the week before the viva/printing etc

        – DGarside
        Mar 14 '12 at 21:11








      • 6





        I'm surprised Texlipse scores so low on this. To my mind it is far superior to many of the bespoke LaTeX packages. It automatically flags up errors AS YOU TYPE THEM, and compiles smartly so that minor errors are ignored. Consequently the time spent dealing with errors is greatly reduced. Compiling is a doddle as one can edit while compiling. The "Templates" feature (CTRL + SPACE) is superb. It also runs without installation if like me you are working on a locked-down Windows machine. As mentioned above SVN is a major plus.

        – Nick Riches
        Feb 11 '13 at 11:07








      • 3





        My problem is that Eclipse needs to put everything in projects, so you don't simply edit and compile a .tex file. Instead you have to click through the New Project Wizard. Or am I wrong?

        – marczellm
        Mar 9 '13 at 10:34
















      58














      TeXlipse



      Available for: Windows, Mac, Linux and others (Java based)

      Open Source





      I've been happily using TeXlipse in Eclipse for a long time, it has integrated code completion (including BibTeX entries), customizable templates, an outline view - and being integrated into Eclipse it includes all useful stuff I'm used to when working in Eclipse, like editor shortcuts, version control, etc.



      There is also an Eclipse pdf viewer plugin Pdf4Eclipse with complete support of SyncTeX, which allows forward and reverse search in LaTeX documents. Since TeXlipse rebuilds the LaTeX sources automatically (in background) after a save, the code and the preview of the document are always synchronized.



      Example of TeXlipse together with Pdf4Eclipse
      Click image to enlarge






      share|improve this answer





















      • 3





        Does TeXlipse / Eclipse compile the documents well? Including running pdflatex and bibtex multiple times?

        – Dima
        Jul 27 '10 at 15:04






      • 8





        It's probably worth mentioning that Eclipse might not be the best choice to install as a TeX-only IDE if you don't already have it, just because it's rather large and has many features that aren't needed to write up an assignment, for example.

        – Michael Underwood
        Jul 27 '10 at 20:11






      • 3





        One plugin that is almost essential for PhD writers is integrated SVN/GIT backup using subclipse/eGit. Every edit is retrievable and can be stored in the cloud. There's enough horror stories on the net about losing one's thesis because of a hard-drive failure the week before the viva/printing etc

        – DGarside
        Mar 14 '12 at 21:11








      • 6





        I'm surprised Texlipse scores so low on this. To my mind it is far superior to many of the bespoke LaTeX packages. It automatically flags up errors AS YOU TYPE THEM, and compiles smartly so that minor errors are ignored. Consequently the time spent dealing with errors is greatly reduced. Compiling is a doddle as one can edit while compiling. The "Templates" feature (CTRL + SPACE) is superb. It also runs without installation if like me you are working on a locked-down Windows machine. As mentioned above SVN is a major plus.

        – Nick Riches
        Feb 11 '13 at 11:07








      • 3





        My problem is that Eclipse needs to put everything in projects, so you don't simply edit and compile a .tex file. Instead you have to click through the New Project Wizard. Or am I wrong?

        – marczellm
        Mar 9 '13 at 10:34














      58












      58








      58







      TeXlipse



      Available for: Windows, Mac, Linux and others (Java based)

      Open Source





      I've been happily using TeXlipse in Eclipse for a long time, it has integrated code completion (including BibTeX entries), customizable templates, an outline view - and being integrated into Eclipse it includes all useful stuff I'm used to when working in Eclipse, like editor shortcuts, version control, etc.



      There is also an Eclipse pdf viewer plugin Pdf4Eclipse with complete support of SyncTeX, which allows forward and reverse search in LaTeX documents. Since TeXlipse rebuilds the LaTeX sources automatically (in background) after a save, the code and the preview of the document are always synchronized.



      Example of TeXlipse together with Pdf4Eclipse
      Click image to enlarge






      share|improve this answer















      TeXlipse



      Available for: Windows, Mac, Linux and others (Java based)

      Open Source





      I've been happily using TeXlipse in Eclipse for a long time, it has integrated code completion (including BibTeX entries), customizable templates, an outline view - and being integrated into Eclipse it includes all useful stuff I'm used to when working in Eclipse, like editor shortcuts, version control, etc.



      There is also an Eclipse pdf viewer plugin Pdf4Eclipse with complete support of SyncTeX, which allows forward and reverse search in LaTeX documents. Since TeXlipse rebuilds the LaTeX sources automatically (in background) after a save, the code and the preview of the document are always synchronized.



      Example of TeXlipse together with Pdf4Eclipse
      Click image to enlarge







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Mar 26 '17 at 14:59


























      community wiki





      5 revs, 5 users 32%
      Boris









      • 3





        Does TeXlipse / Eclipse compile the documents well? Including running pdflatex and bibtex multiple times?

        – Dima
        Jul 27 '10 at 15:04






      • 8





        It's probably worth mentioning that Eclipse might not be the best choice to install as a TeX-only IDE if you don't already have it, just because it's rather large and has many features that aren't needed to write up an assignment, for example.

        – Michael Underwood
        Jul 27 '10 at 20:11






      • 3





        One plugin that is almost essential for PhD writers is integrated SVN/GIT backup using subclipse/eGit. Every edit is retrievable and can be stored in the cloud. There's enough horror stories on the net about losing one's thesis because of a hard-drive failure the week before the viva/printing etc

        – DGarside
        Mar 14 '12 at 21:11








      • 6





        I'm surprised Texlipse scores so low on this. To my mind it is far superior to many of the bespoke LaTeX packages. It automatically flags up errors AS YOU TYPE THEM, and compiles smartly so that minor errors are ignored. Consequently the time spent dealing with errors is greatly reduced. Compiling is a doddle as one can edit while compiling. The "Templates" feature (CTRL + SPACE) is superb. It also runs without installation if like me you are working on a locked-down Windows machine. As mentioned above SVN is a major plus.

        – Nick Riches
        Feb 11 '13 at 11:07








      • 3





        My problem is that Eclipse needs to put everything in projects, so you don't simply edit and compile a .tex file. Instead you have to click through the New Project Wizard. Or am I wrong?

        – marczellm
        Mar 9 '13 at 10:34














      • 3





        Does TeXlipse / Eclipse compile the documents well? Including running pdflatex and bibtex multiple times?

        – Dima
        Jul 27 '10 at 15:04






      • 8





        It's probably worth mentioning that Eclipse might not be the best choice to install as a TeX-only IDE if you don't already have it, just because it's rather large and has many features that aren't needed to write up an assignment, for example.

        – Michael Underwood
        Jul 27 '10 at 20:11






      • 3





        One plugin that is almost essential for PhD writers is integrated SVN/GIT backup using subclipse/eGit. Every edit is retrievable and can be stored in the cloud. There's enough horror stories on the net about losing one's thesis because of a hard-drive failure the week before the viva/printing etc

        – DGarside
        Mar 14 '12 at 21:11








      • 6





        I'm surprised Texlipse scores so low on this. To my mind it is far superior to many of the bespoke LaTeX packages. It automatically flags up errors AS YOU TYPE THEM, and compiles smartly so that minor errors are ignored. Consequently the time spent dealing with errors is greatly reduced. Compiling is a doddle as one can edit while compiling. The "Templates" feature (CTRL + SPACE) is superb. It also runs without installation if like me you are working on a locked-down Windows machine. As mentioned above SVN is a major plus.

        – Nick Riches
        Feb 11 '13 at 11:07








      • 3





        My problem is that Eclipse needs to put everything in projects, so you don't simply edit and compile a .tex file. Instead you have to click through the New Project Wizard. Or am I wrong?

        – marczellm
        Mar 9 '13 at 10:34








      3




      3





      Does TeXlipse / Eclipse compile the documents well? Including running pdflatex and bibtex multiple times?

      – Dima
      Jul 27 '10 at 15:04





      Does TeXlipse / Eclipse compile the documents well? Including running pdflatex and bibtex multiple times?

      – Dima
      Jul 27 '10 at 15:04




      8




      8





      It's probably worth mentioning that Eclipse might not be the best choice to install as a TeX-only IDE if you don't already have it, just because it's rather large and has many features that aren't needed to write up an assignment, for example.

      – Michael Underwood
      Jul 27 '10 at 20:11





      It's probably worth mentioning that Eclipse might not be the best choice to install as a TeX-only IDE if you don't already have it, just because it's rather large and has many features that aren't needed to write up an assignment, for example.

      – Michael Underwood
      Jul 27 '10 at 20:11




      3




      3





      One plugin that is almost essential for PhD writers is integrated SVN/GIT backup using subclipse/eGit. Every edit is retrievable and can be stored in the cloud. There's enough horror stories on the net about losing one's thesis because of a hard-drive failure the week before the viva/printing etc

      – DGarside
      Mar 14 '12 at 21:11







      One plugin that is almost essential for PhD writers is integrated SVN/GIT backup using subclipse/eGit. Every edit is retrievable and can be stored in the cloud. There's enough horror stories on the net about losing one's thesis because of a hard-drive failure the week before the viva/printing etc

      – DGarside
      Mar 14 '12 at 21:11






      6




      6





      I'm surprised Texlipse scores so low on this. To my mind it is far superior to many of the bespoke LaTeX packages. It automatically flags up errors AS YOU TYPE THEM, and compiles smartly so that minor errors are ignored. Consequently the time spent dealing with errors is greatly reduced. Compiling is a doddle as one can edit while compiling. The "Templates" feature (CTRL + SPACE) is superb. It also runs without installation if like me you are working on a locked-down Windows machine. As mentioned above SVN is a major plus.

      – Nick Riches
      Feb 11 '13 at 11:07







      I'm surprised Texlipse scores so low on this. To my mind it is far superior to many of the bespoke LaTeX packages. It automatically flags up errors AS YOU TYPE THEM, and compiles smartly so that minor errors are ignored. Consequently the time spent dealing with errors is greatly reduced. Compiling is a doddle as one can edit while compiling. The "Templates" feature (CTRL + SPACE) is superb. It also runs without installation if like me you are working on a locked-down Windows machine. As mentioned above SVN is a major plus.

      – Nick Riches
      Feb 11 '13 at 11:07






      3




      3





      My problem is that Eclipse needs to put everything in projects, so you don't simply edit and compile a .tex file. Instead you have to click through the New Project Wizard. Or am I wrong?

      – marczellm
      Mar 9 '13 at 10:34





      My problem is that Eclipse needs to put everything in projects, so you don't simply edit and compile a .tex file. Instead you have to click through the New Project Wizard. Or am I wrong?

      – marczellm
      Mar 9 '13 at 10:34











      51














      Gummi





      • Platforms: Linux (unstable development version for Windows exists)


      • License: Open Source (MIT)


      • Languages: ar, ca, cs, da, de, el, es, fr, hu, it, nl, pl, pt, pt-BR, ro, ru, zh-CN, zh-TW


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi support: ?


      • % !TEX directives: Yes


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes


      • Code Completion: No


      • Code Folding: No,


      • Spell Checking: Yes (liited


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes


      • Project Management: Yes




      Emacs is great, but what I generally use is Gummi. It has a 2-pane live preview which is really useful for catching syntax errors and formatting errors early on. Plus, when you save your latex document it will automatically save a pdf copy. Other features include helpers for matrix and table editing, inserting images, and a citing tool. Even better, there are configurable snippets of code. For example just writing "item" + Tab write an itemize environment and the first item, and left the cursor after item.



      It should be noted that Gummi really work with a hidden temporal copy as .file.tex.swp (instead that directly with file.tex) for previews, and the same happen with auxiliary files. This have the advantage that your working directory apparently remain clean but occasionally this can produce unexpected errors (e.g., using jobname in Gummi)



      screenshot






      share|improve this answer





















      • 1





        Gummi is really useful when you are creating the code for a picture (eg PSTricks or Tikz). You'll see your picture change as you add to your code.

        – DJP
        Jul 22 '11 at 16:02













      • Gummi is a really minimalist, distraction-free excellent piece of code. The Windows version is not so often updated, but works fine.

        – Frederico Lopes
        Oct 16 '12 at 19:16






      • 4





        +1 for distraction-and-clutter-free beginner-friendliness!

        – nutty about natty
        Mar 30 '13 at 18:49











      • -1 for lack of support for luatex :(

        – nutty about natty
        Aug 13 '17 at 19:35
















      51














      Gummi





      • Platforms: Linux (unstable development version for Windows exists)


      • License: Open Source (MIT)


      • Languages: ar, ca, cs, da, de, el, es, fr, hu, it, nl, pl, pt, pt-BR, ro, ru, zh-CN, zh-TW


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi support: ?


      • % !TEX directives: Yes


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes


      • Code Completion: No


      • Code Folding: No,


      • Spell Checking: Yes (liited


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes


      • Project Management: Yes




      Emacs is great, but what I generally use is Gummi. It has a 2-pane live preview which is really useful for catching syntax errors and formatting errors early on. Plus, when you save your latex document it will automatically save a pdf copy. Other features include helpers for matrix and table editing, inserting images, and a citing tool. Even better, there are configurable snippets of code. For example just writing "item" + Tab write an itemize environment and the first item, and left the cursor after item.



      It should be noted that Gummi really work with a hidden temporal copy as .file.tex.swp (instead that directly with file.tex) for previews, and the same happen with auxiliary files. This have the advantage that your working directory apparently remain clean but occasionally this can produce unexpected errors (e.g., using jobname in Gummi)



      screenshot






      share|improve this answer





















      • 1





        Gummi is really useful when you are creating the code for a picture (eg PSTricks or Tikz). You'll see your picture change as you add to your code.

        – DJP
        Jul 22 '11 at 16:02













      • Gummi is a really minimalist, distraction-free excellent piece of code. The Windows version is not so often updated, but works fine.

        – Frederico Lopes
        Oct 16 '12 at 19:16






      • 4





        +1 for distraction-and-clutter-free beginner-friendliness!

        – nutty about natty
        Mar 30 '13 at 18:49











      • -1 for lack of support for luatex :(

        – nutty about natty
        Aug 13 '17 at 19:35














      51












      51








      51







      Gummi





      • Platforms: Linux (unstable development version for Windows exists)


      • License: Open Source (MIT)


      • Languages: ar, ca, cs, da, de, el, es, fr, hu, it, nl, pl, pt, pt-BR, ro, ru, zh-CN, zh-TW


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi support: ?


      • % !TEX directives: Yes


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes


      • Code Completion: No


      • Code Folding: No,


      • Spell Checking: Yes (liited


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes


      • Project Management: Yes




      Emacs is great, but what I generally use is Gummi. It has a 2-pane live preview which is really useful for catching syntax errors and formatting errors early on. Plus, when you save your latex document it will automatically save a pdf copy. Other features include helpers for matrix and table editing, inserting images, and a citing tool. Even better, there are configurable snippets of code. For example just writing "item" + Tab write an itemize environment and the first item, and left the cursor after item.



      It should be noted that Gummi really work with a hidden temporal copy as .file.tex.swp (instead that directly with file.tex) for previews, and the same happen with auxiliary files. This have the advantage that your working directory apparently remain clean but occasionally this can produce unexpected errors (e.g., using jobname in Gummi)



      screenshot






      share|improve this answer















      Gummi





      • Platforms: Linux (unstable development version for Windows exists)


      • License: Open Source (MIT)


      • Languages: ar, ca, cs, da, de, el, es, fr, hu, it, nl, pl, pt, pt-BR, ro, ru, zh-CN, zh-TW


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi support: ?


      • % !TEX directives: Yes


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes


      • Code Completion: No


      • Code Folding: No,


      • Spell Checking: Yes (liited


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes


      • Project Management: Yes




      Emacs is great, but what I generally use is Gummi. It has a 2-pane live preview which is really useful for catching syntax errors and formatting errors early on. Plus, when you save your latex document it will automatically save a pdf copy. Other features include helpers for matrix and table editing, inserting images, and a citing tool. Even better, there are configurable snippets of code. For example just writing "item" + Tab write an itemize environment and the first item, and left the cursor after item.



      It should be noted that Gummi really work with a hidden temporal copy as .file.tex.swp (instead that directly with file.tex) for previews, and the same happen with auxiliary files. This have the advantage that your working directory apparently remain clean but occasionally this can produce unexpected errors (e.g., using jobname in Gummi)



      screenshot







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:35


























      community wiki





      9 revs, 8 users 35%
      Kess Vargavind









      • 1





        Gummi is really useful when you are creating the code for a picture (eg PSTricks or Tikz). You'll see your picture change as you add to your code.

        – DJP
        Jul 22 '11 at 16:02













      • Gummi is a really minimalist, distraction-free excellent piece of code. The Windows version is not so often updated, but works fine.

        – Frederico Lopes
        Oct 16 '12 at 19:16






      • 4





        +1 for distraction-and-clutter-free beginner-friendliness!

        – nutty about natty
        Mar 30 '13 at 18:49











      • -1 for lack of support for luatex :(

        – nutty about natty
        Aug 13 '17 at 19:35














      • 1





        Gummi is really useful when you are creating the code for a picture (eg PSTricks or Tikz). You'll see your picture change as you add to your code.

        – DJP
        Jul 22 '11 at 16:02













      • Gummi is a really minimalist, distraction-free excellent piece of code. The Windows version is not so often updated, but works fine.

        – Frederico Lopes
        Oct 16 '12 at 19:16






      • 4





        +1 for distraction-and-clutter-free beginner-friendliness!

        – nutty about natty
        Mar 30 '13 at 18:49











      • -1 for lack of support for luatex :(

        – nutty about natty
        Aug 13 '17 at 19:35








      1




      1





      Gummi is really useful when you are creating the code for a picture (eg PSTricks or Tikz). You'll see your picture change as you add to your code.

      – DJP
      Jul 22 '11 at 16:02







      Gummi is really useful when you are creating the code for a picture (eg PSTricks or Tikz). You'll see your picture change as you add to your code.

      – DJP
      Jul 22 '11 at 16:02















      Gummi is a really minimalist, distraction-free excellent piece of code. The Windows version is not so often updated, but works fine.

      – Frederico Lopes
      Oct 16 '12 at 19:16





      Gummi is a really minimalist, distraction-free excellent piece of code. The Windows version is not so often updated, but works fine.

      – Frederico Lopes
      Oct 16 '12 at 19:16




      4




      4





      +1 for distraction-and-clutter-free beginner-friendliness!

      – nutty about natty
      Mar 30 '13 at 18:49





      +1 for distraction-and-clutter-free beginner-friendliness!

      – nutty about natty
      Mar 30 '13 at 18:49













      -1 for lack of support for luatex :(

      – nutty about natty
      Aug 13 '17 at 19:35





      -1 for lack of support for luatex :(

      – nutty about natty
      Aug 13 '17 at 19:35











      50














      Notepad++





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8


      • License: Free software (GPL)


      • Languages: en, zh, fr, es, hu, ru, nl, pl, de, it, da, cs, sl, sk, uk, tr, pt, no, sv, ca, ar, lt, gl, fi, el, ro, ko, he, fa, sgs, bg, id, sq, ja, hr, ka, eu, be, sr, nn, th, ms, oc, fur, lb, tl, uz, kk, af, ky, mk, lv, ta, az, bs, eo, lij, hi, sc, ug, te, an, si


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: Yes


      • % !TEX directives: No


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable (also background color)


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes (through DSpellCheck)


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: No. You can configure notepad++ to use an external PDF viewer like Acrobat Reader or SumatraPDF with forward and backward searching.


      • Project Management: Yes (no master file)




      notepad++ sample document screen shot



      I use Notepad++ and I love it. It has all the powerful features you expect from a good text editor (powerful find/replace, regex, macros, plugin support, etc.) and lots of features for coding, like syntax highlighting (and it has built-in rules for TeX), code folding, etc. The best part is that you can map keys to run external programs, so all you have to do is tap a bound key and it instantly runs your favorite compiler or automator and displays your output in one step, outputting errors in the command window if there are any.



      It's not made exclusively for TeX, but if you're on Windows and want to use a single text editor for many purposes, one of which is TeX, Notepad++ is a very good option.





      This question has answers with two methods of setting up the connection between notepad++ and a TeX distribution, as well as with SumatraPDF.






      share|improve this answer


























      • I would really second this approach as Notepad++ has capabilities far beyond what any editor on Windows have. (from my experience). The easiness in creating macros, recording, etc. is surprising and it does all this with one program!

        – zeroth
        Mar 25 '12 at 18:09











      • .bib syntax highlighting is available as an add-on as well. And regex find/replace built in is very useful.

        – Chris H
        Jul 31 '13 at 13:40













      • I use notepad++ for my bib files, as it is more bare bones and easier to get what I want done. Also if I don't use emacs a lot it is hard to flip into its shortcuts from windows programs, though I admit it is better for what I want to do.

        – Canageek
        Jul 2 '14 at 17:52











      • I particularly agree with the last-but-one paragraph "if you're on Windows...".

        – MattAllegro
        Nov 10 '14 at 21:28











      • There is a native Linux port of Notepad++: see askubuntu.com/a/413179/16395 (I do not know if it has the same LaTeX capabilty, though).

        – Rmano
        Apr 12 '16 at 14:31


















      50














      Notepad++





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8


      • License: Free software (GPL)


      • Languages: en, zh, fr, es, hu, ru, nl, pl, de, it, da, cs, sl, sk, uk, tr, pt, no, sv, ca, ar, lt, gl, fi, el, ro, ko, he, fa, sgs, bg, id, sq, ja, hr, ka, eu, be, sr, nn, th, ms, oc, fur, lb, tl, uz, kk, af, ky, mk, lv, ta, az, bs, eo, lij, hi, sc, ug, te, an, si


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: Yes


      • % !TEX directives: No


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable (also background color)


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes (through DSpellCheck)


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: No. You can configure notepad++ to use an external PDF viewer like Acrobat Reader or SumatraPDF with forward and backward searching.


      • Project Management: Yes (no master file)




      notepad++ sample document screen shot



      I use Notepad++ and I love it. It has all the powerful features you expect from a good text editor (powerful find/replace, regex, macros, plugin support, etc.) and lots of features for coding, like syntax highlighting (and it has built-in rules for TeX), code folding, etc. The best part is that you can map keys to run external programs, so all you have to do is tap a bound key and it instantly runs your favorite compiler or automator and displays your output in one step, outputting errors in the command window if there are any.



      It's not made exclusively for TeX, but if you're on Windows and want to use a single text editor for many purposes, one of which is TeX, Notepad++ is a very good option.





      This question has answers with two methods of setting up the connection between notepad++ and a TeX distribution, as well as with SumatraPDF.






      share|improve this answer


























      • I would really second this approach as Notepad++ has capabilities far beyond what any editor on Windows have. (from my experience). The easiness in creating macros, recording, etc. is surprising and it does all this with one program!

        – zeroth
        Mar 25 '12 at 18:09











      • .bib syntax highlighting is available as an add-on as well. And regex find/replace built in is very useful.

        – Chris H
        Jul 31 '13 at 13:40













      • I use notepad++ for my bib files, as it is more bare bones and easier to get what I want done. Also if I don't use emacs a lot it is hard to flip into its shortcuts from windows programs, though I admit it is better for what I want to do.

        – Canageek
        Jul 2 '14 at 17:52











      • I particularly agree with the last-but-one paragraph "if you're on Windows...".

        – MattAllegro
        Nov 10 '14 at 21:28











      • There is a native Linux port of Notepad++: see askubuntu.com/a/413179/16395 (I do not know if it has the same LaTeX capabilty, though).

        – Rmano
        Apr 12 '16 at 14:31
















      50












      50








      50







      Notepad++





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8


      • License: Free software (GPL)


      • Languages: en, zh, fr, es, hu, ru, nl, pl, de, it, da, cs, sl, sk, uk, tr, pt, no, sv, ca, ar, lt, gl, fi, el, ro, ko, he, fa, sgs, bg, id, sq, ja, hr, ka, eu, be, sr, nn, th, ms, oc, fur, lb, tl, uz, kk, af, ky, mk, lv, ta, az, bs, eo, lij, hi, sc, ug, te, an, si


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: Yes


      • % !TEX directives: No


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable (also background color)


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes (through DSpellCheck)


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: No. You can configure notepad++ to use an external PDF viewer like Acrobat Reader or SumatraPDF with forward and backward searching.


      • Project Management: Yes (no master file)




      notepad++ sample document screen shot



      I use Notepad++ and I love it. It has all the powerful features you expect from a good text editor (powerful find/replace, regex, macros, plugin support, etc.) and lots of features for coding, like syntax highlighting (and it has built-in rules for TeX), code folding, etc. The best part is that you can map keys to run external programs, so all you have to do is tap a bound key and it instantly runs your favorite compiler or automator and displays your output in one step, outputting errors in the command window if there are any.



      It's not made exclusively for TeX, but if you're on Windows and want to use a single text editor for many purposes, one of which is TeX, Notepad++ is a very good option.





      This question has answers with two methods of setting up the connection between notepad++ and a TeX distribution, as well as with SumatraPDF.






      share|improve this answer















      Notepad++





      • Platforms: Windows XP/Vista/7/8


      • License: Free software (GPL)


      • Languages: en, zh, fr, es, hu, ru, nl, pl, de, it, da, cs, sl, sk, uk, tr, pt, no, sv, ca, ar, lt, gl, fi, el, ro, ko, he, fa, sgs, bg, id, sq, ja, hr, ka, eu, be, sr, nn, th, ms, oc, fur, lb, tl, uz, kk, af, ky, mk, lv, ta, az, bs, eo, lij, hi, sc, ug, te, an, si


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi: Yes


      • % !TEX directives: No


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable (also background color)


      • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code Folding: Yes


      • Spell Checking: Yes (through DSpellCheck)


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: No. You can configure notepad++ to use an external PDF viewer like Acrobat Reader or SumatraPDF with forward and backward searching.


      • Project Management: Yes (no master file)




      notepad++ sample document screen shot



      I use Notepad++ and I love it. It has all the powerful features you expect from a good text editor (powerful find/replace, regex, macros, plugin support, etc.) and lots of features for coding, like syntax highlighting (and it has built-in rules for TeX), code folding, etc. The best part is that you can map keys to run external programs, so all you have to do is tap a bound key and it instantly runs your favorite compiler or automator and displays your output in one step, outputting errors in the command window if there are any.



      It's not made exclusively for TeX, but if you're on Windows and want to use a single text editor for many purposes, one of which is TeX, Notepad++ is a very good option.





      This question has answers with two methods of setting up the connection between notepad++ and a TeX distribution, as well as with SumatraPDF.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:35


























      community wiki





      5 revs, 4 users 56%
      Mr Komandez














      • I would really second this approach as Notepad++ has capabilities far beyond what any editor on Windows have. (from my experience). The easiness in creating macros, recording, etc. is surprising and it does all this with one program!

        – zeroth
        Mar 25 '12 at 18:09











      • .bib syntax highlighting is available as an add-on as well. And regex find/replace built in is very useful.

        – Chris H
        Jul 31 '13 at 13:40













      • I use notepad++ for my bib files, as it is more bare bones and easier to get what I want done. Also if I don't use emacs a lot it is hard to flip into its shortcuts from windows programs, though I admit it is better for what I want to do.

        – Canageek
        Jul 2 '14 at 17:52











      • I particularly agree with the last-but-one paragraph "if you're on Windows...".

        – MattAllegro
        Nov 10 '14 at 21:28











      • There is a native Linux port of Notepad++: see askubuntu.com/a/413179/16395 (I do not know if it has the same LaTeX capabilty, though).

        – Rmano
        Apr 12 '16 at 14:31





















      • I would really second this approach as Notepad++ has capabilities far beyond what any editor on Windows have. (from my experience). The easiness in creating macros, recording, etc. is surprising and it does all this with one program!

        – zeroth
        Mar 25 '12 at 18:09











      • .bib syntax highlighting is available as an add-on as well. And regex find/replace built in is very useful.

        – Chris H
        Jul 31 '13 at 13:40













      • I use notepad++ for my bib files, as it is more bare bones and easier to get what I want done. Also if I don't use emacs a lot it is hard to flip into its shortcuts from windows programs, though I admit it is better for what I want to do.

        – Canageek
        Jul 2 '14 at 17:52











      • I particularly agree with the last-but-one paragraph "if you're on Windows...".

        – MattAllegro
        Nov 10 '14 at 21:28











      • There is a native Linux port of Notepad++: see askubuntu.com/a/413179/16395 (I do not know if it has the same LaTeX capabilty, though).

        – Rmano
        Apr 12 '16 at 14:31



















      I would really second this approach as Notepad++ has capabilities far beyond what any editor on Windows have. (from my experience). The easiness in creating macros, recording, etc. is surprising and it does all this with one program!

      – zeroth
      Mar 25 '12 at 18:09





      I would really second this approach as Notepad++ has capabilities far beyond what any editor on Windows have. (from my experience). The easiness in creating macros, recording, etc. is surprising and it does all this with one program!

      – zeroth
      Mar 25 '12 at 18:09













      .bib syntax highlighting is available as an add-on as well. And regex find/replace built in is very useful.

      – Chris H
      Jul 31 '13 at 13:40







      .bib syntax highlighting is available as an add-on as well. And regex find/replace built in is very useful.

      – Chris H
      Jul 31 '13 at 13:40















      I use notepad++ for my bib files, as it is more bare bones and easier to get what I want done. Also if I don't use emacs a lot it is hard to flip into its shortcuts from windows programs, though I admit it is better for what I want to do.

      – Canageek
      Jul 2 '14 at 17:52





      I use notepad++ for my bib files, as it is more bare bones and easier to get what I want done. Also if I don't use emacs a lot it is hard to flip into its shortcuts from windows programs, though I admit it is better for what I want to do.

      – Canageek
      Jul 2 '14 at 17:52













      I particularly agree with the last-but-one paragraph "if you're on Windows...".

      – MattAllegro
      Nov 10 '14 at 21:28





      I particularly agree with the last-but-one paragraph "if you're on Windows...".

      – MattAllegro
      Nov 10 '14 at 21:28













      There is a native Linux port of Notepad++: see askubuntu.com/a/413179/16395 (I do not know if it has the same LaTeX capabilty, though).

      – Rmano
      Apr 12 '16 at 14:31







      There is a native Linux port of Notepad++: see askubuntu.com/a/413179/16395 (I do not know if it has the same LaTeX capabilty, though).

      – Rmano
      Apr 12 '16 at 14:31













      50















      Atom with latex, latex-plus, or latextools packages





      • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Linux


      • Licence: Open source (MIT license)


      • % !TEX directives: Yes


      • Syntax highlighting: Yes (with language-latex package), customizable


      • Code completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code folding: Yes


      • Spell check: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in output viewer: Yes (with pdf-view package)


      • Project management: Yes (with atom-project-manager package)




      Atom is a modern, approachable, yet throughly hackable text editor based on web technologies, with a large community providing extensions through its highly customizable package system. Atom has packages providing Git integration, BibTeX autocompletion and many other features. It draws frequent comparisons with Sublime Text, but has the notable advantage of being open source and completely free.



      To compile LaTeX from within the editor, one may choose from a number of packages: latex, latex-plus, and latextools. The last one is an ongoing port of Sublime Text's LaTeXTools plugin and seems to be the most feature-rich of the three (as of 2016-03-20), with additional goodies like reference and bibliography completion as well as environment wrapping. Alternatively, the latexer package also provides reference and bibliography completion.



      Syntax highlighting is separately provided by the language-latex package. The output can be automatically opened and synced within the editor through the pdf-view package, or in an external viewer.



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer


























      • latextools + language-latex seems to be the best package combination to me as well. However I find atom quite unstable, crashing 2 to 3 times a day with data loss...

        – jan-glx
        Apr 9 '16 at 9:12











      • @YAK That is odd. I use the same two packages for LaTeX and Atom doesn't crash on me.

        – edwinksl
        Jun 21 '16 at 10:56






      • 1





        If you build your pdf with "Cmd + alt + b", how to you keep the builder from dumping all that *.log, *.aux, *.fls etc. files in your directory? I'd like to keep my *.tex files alone

        – alsdkjasdlkja
        Jun 26 '16 at 0:11











      • I have a Windows 10 x64 PC. I have Atom, latextools, languagelatex and pdf-view installed. When I try to build the PDF (pdfLaTeX), there's an error, stating, ! LaTeX Error: File memoir.cls' not found.` I've added the path to MikTex to TeXpath. I still get the error.

        – Ram Iyer
        Sep 12 '16 at 19:12






      • 2





        @nxrd Probably a late response, but others might be interested, latextools has this as an upcoming feature. In the meantime, you can delete your temp files with the keystroke cmd+L backspace.

        – Runar
        Oct 26 '16 at 19:23
















      50















      Atom with latex, latex-plus, or latextools packages





      • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Linux


      • Licence: Open source (MIT license)


      • % !TEX directives: Yes


      • Syntax highlighting: Yes (with language-latex package), customizable


      • Code completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code folding: Yes


      • Spell check: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in output viewer: Yes (with pdf-view package)


      • Project management: Yes (with atom-project-manager package)




      Atom is a modern, approachable, yet throughly hackable text editor based on web technologies, with a large community providing extensions through its highly customizable package system. Atom has packages providing Git integration, BibTeX autocompletion and many other features. It draws frequent comparisons with Sublime Text, but has the notable advantage of being open source and completely free.



      To compile LaTeX from within the editor, one may choose from a number of packages: latex, latex-plus, and latextools. The last one is an ongoing port of Sublime Text's LaTeXTools plugin and seems to be the most feature-rich of the three (as of 2016-03-20), with additional goodies like reference and bibliography completion as well as environment wrapping. Alternatively, the latexer package also provides reference and bibliography completion.



      Syntax highlighting is separately provided by the language-latex package. The output can be automatically opened and synced within the editor through the pdf-view package, or in an external viewer.



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer


























      • latextools + language-latex seems to be the best package combination to me as well. However I find atom quite unstable, crashing 2 to 3 times a day with data loss...

        – jan-glx
        Apr 9 '16 at 9:12











      • @YAK That is odd. I use the same two packages for LaTeX and Atom doesn't crash on me.

        – edwinksl
        Jun 21 '16 at 10:56






      • 1





        If you build your pdf with "Cmd + alt + b", how to you keep the builder from dumping all that *.log, *.aux, *.fls etc. files in your directory? I'd like to keep my *.tex files alone

        – alsdkjasdlkja
        Jun 26 '16 at 0:11











      • I have a Windows 10 x64 PC. I have Atom, latextools, languagelatex and pdf-view installed. When I try to build the PDF (pdfLaTeX), there's an error, stating, ! LaTeX Error: File memoir.cls' not found.` I've added the path to MikTex to TeXpath. I still get the error.

        – Ram Iyer
        Sep 12 '16 at 19:12






      • 2





        @nxrd Probably a late response, but others might be interested, latextools has this as an upcoming feature. In the meantime, you can delete your temp files with the keystroke cmd+L backspace.

        – Runar
        Oct 26 '16 at 19:23














      50












      50








      50








      Atom with latex, latex-plus, or latextools packages





      • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Linux


      • Licence: Open source (MIT license)


      • % !TEX directives: Yes


      • Syntax highlighting: Yes (with language-latex package), customizable


      • Code completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code folding: Yes


      • Spell check: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in output viewer: Yes (with pdf-view package)


      • Project management: Yes (with atom-project-manager package)




      Atom is a modern, approachable, yet throughly hackable text editor based on web technologies, with a large community providing extensions through its highly customizable package system. Atom has packages providing Git integration, BibTeX autocompletion and many other features. It draws frequent comparisons with Sublime Text, but has the notable advantage of being open source and completely free.



      To compile LaTeX from within the editor, one may choose from a number of packages: latex, latex-plus, and latextools. The last one is an ongoing port of Sublime Text's LaTeXTools plugin and seems to be the most feature-rich of the three (as of 2016-03-20), with additional goodies like reference and bibliography completion as well as environment wrapping. Alternatively, the latexer package also provides reference and bibliography completion.



      Syntax highlighting is separately provided by the language-latex package. The output can be automatically opened and synced within the editor through the pdf-view package, or in an external viewer.



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer
















      Atom with latex, latex-plus, or latextools packages





      • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Linux


      • Licence: Open source (MIT license)


      • % !TEX directives: Yes


      • Syntax highlighting: Yes (with language-latex package), customizable


      • Code completion: Yes, customizable


      • Code folding: Yes


      • Spell check: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in output viewer: Yes (with pdf-view package)


      • Project management: Yes (with atom-project-manager package)




      Atom is a modern, approachable, yet throughly hackable text editor based on web technologies, with a large community providing extensions through its highly customizable package system. Atom has packages providing Git integration, BibTeX autocompletion and many other features. It draws frequent comparisons with Sublime Text, but has the notable advantage of being open source and completely free.



      To compile LaTeX from within the editor, one may choose from a number of packages: latex, latex-plus, and latextools. The last one is an ongoing port of Sublime Text's LaTeXTools plugin and seems to be the most feature-rich of the three (as of 2016-03-20), with additional goodies like reference and bibliography completion as well as environment wrapping. Alternatively, the latexer package also provides reference and bibliography completion.



      Syntax highlighting is separately provided by the language-latex package. The output can be automatically opened and synced within the editor through the pdf-view package, or in an external viewer.



      enter image description here







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Apr 23 '17 at 17:24


























      community wiki





      5 revs, 5 users 67%
      You














      • latextools + language-latex seems to be the best package combination to me as well. However I find atom quite unstable, crashing 2 to 3 times a day with data loss...

        – jan-glx
        Apr 9 '16 at 9:12











      • @YAK That is odd. I use the same two packages for LaTeX and Atom doesn't crash on me.

        – edwinksl
        Jun 21 '16 at 10:56






      • 1





        If you build your pdf with "Cmd + alt + b", how to you keep the builder from dumping all that *.log, *.aux, *.fls etc. files in your directory? I'd like to keep my *.tex files alone

        – alsdkjasdlkja
        Jun 26 '16 at 0:11











      • I have a Windows 10 x64 PC. I have Atom, latextools, languagelatex and pdf-view installed. When I try to build the PDF (pdfLaTeX), there's an error, stating, ! LaTeX Error: File memoir.cls' not found.` I've added the path to MikTex to TeXpath. I still get the error.

        – Ram Iyer
        Sep 12 '16 at 19:12






      • 2





        @nxrd Probably a late response, but others might be interested, latextools has this as an upcoming feature. In the meantime, you can delete your temp files with the keystroke cmd+L backspace.

        – Runar
        Oct 26 '16 at 19:23



















      • latextools + language-latex seems to be the best package combination to me as well. However I find atom quite unstable, crashing 2 to 3 times a day with data loss...

        – jan-glx
        Apr 9 '16 at 9:12











      • @YAK That is odd. I use the same two packages for LaTeX and Atom doesn't crash on me.

        – edwinksl
        Jun 21 '16 at 10:56






      • 1





        If you build your pdf with "Cmd + alt + b", how to you keep the builder from dumping all that *.log, *.aux, *.fls etc. files in your directory? I'd like to keep my *.tex files alone

        – alsdkjasdlkja
        Jun 26 '16 at 0:11











      • I have a Windows 10 x64 PC. I have Atom, latextools, languagelatex and pdf-view installed. When I try to build the PDF (pdfLaTeX), there's an error, stating, ! LaTeX Error: File memoir.cls' not found.` I've added the path to MikTex to TeXpath. I still get the error.

        – Ram Iyer
        Sep 12 '16 at 19:12






      • 2





        @nxrd Probably a late response, but others might be interested, latextools has this as an upcoming feature. In the meantime, you can delete your temp files with the keystroke cmd+L backspace.

        – Runar
        Oct 26 '16 at 19:23

















      latextools + language-latex seems to be the best package combination to me as well. However I find atom quite unstable, crashing 2 to 3 times a day with data loss...

      – jan-glx
      Apr 9 '16 at 9:12





      latextools + language-latex seems to be the best package combination to me as well. However I find atom quite unstable, crashing 2 to 3 times a day with data loss...

      – jan-glx
      Apr 9 '16 at 9:12













      @YAK That is odd. I use the same two packages for LaTeX and Atom doesn't crash on me.

      – edwinksl
      Jun 21 '16 at 10:56





      @YAK That is odd. I use the same two packages for LaTeX and Atom doesn't crash on me.

      – edwinksl
      Jun 21 '16 at 10:56




      1




      1





      If you build your pdf with "Cmd + alt + b", how to you keep the builder from dumping all that *.log, *.aux, *.fls etc. files in your directory? I'd like to keep my *.tex files alone

      – alsdkjasdlkja
      Jun 26 '16 at 0:11





      If you build your pdf with "Cmd + alt + b", how to you keep the builder from dumping all that *.log, *.aux, *.fls etc. files in your directory? I'd like to keep my *.tex files alone

      – alsdkjasdlkja
      Jun 26 '16 at 0:11













      I have a Windows 10 x64 PC. I have Atom, latextools, languagelatex and pdf-view installed. When I try to build the PDF (pdfLaTeX), there's an error, stating, ! LaTeX Error: File memoir.cls' not found.` I've added the path to MikTex to TeXpath. I still get the error.

      – Ram Iyer
      Sep 12 '16 at 19:12





      I have a Windows 10 x64 PC. I have Atom, latextools, languagelatex and pdf-view installed. When I try to build the PDF (pdfLaTeX), there's an error, stating, ! LaTeX Error: File memoir.cls' not found.` I've added the path to MikTex to TeXpath. I still get the error.

      – Ram Iyer
      Sep 12 '16 at 19:12




      2




      2





      @nxrd Probably a late response, but others might be interested, latextools has this as an upcoming feature. In the meantime, you can delete your temp files with the keystroke cmd+L backspace.

      – Runar
      Oct 26 '16 at 19:23





      @nxrd Probably a late response, but others might be interested, latextools has this as an upcoming feature. In the meantime, you can delete your temp files with the keystroke cmd+L backspace.

      – Runar
      Oct 26 '16 at 19:23











      49















      Texpad — texpad





      • Platforms: Mac (and iOS)


      • License: Commercial


      • Languages: English, German and Japanese


      • Unicode: Yes


      • % !TeX directives: Yes


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes


      • Auto-typeset: OSX only


      • Code Completion: Yes, command completion and autofill


      • Code Folding: No


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, supports PDF


      • Project Management: Yes, included files opened automatically




      enter image description here





      Both




      • Document outline (navigatable table of sections, subsection, etc)

      • Auto-detection of typesetting chain (bibtex, makeindex, etc.)

      • Global search

      • Biber support


      OSX




      • Custom typeset scripts

      • Snippets and code macros


      iOS




      • Onboard typesetter with support for Virtual fonts, e-TeX and PGF (beamer/tikz).

      • Built in bundle manager


      • Typesetting API to provide typesetting services to other applications






      share|improve this answer





















      • 10





        This should really be higher on the list.

        – lyxicon
        Dec 8 '13 at 7:05






      • 1





        @lyxicon - Yes, this app is awesome.

        – Kiyoshi
        Feb 8 '14 at 15:13






      • 1





        really love this one

        – Runar
        Dec 31 '15 at 5:15






      • 2





        This is the first app for Mac I ever purchased, and I never regretted it.

        – thiagoveloso
        Nov 27 '16 at 10:43






      • 6





        I downloaded the trial version and I did not even need 24 hours to purchase it! It's amazing and it has the best user interface ever. Updates are regular and developers always get back to you whenever you contact them. Recommended 120%.

        – Héctor
        Mar 26 '17 at 14:55
















      49















      Texpad — texpad





      • Platforms: Mac (and iOS)


      • License: Commercial


      • Languages: English, German and Japanese


      • Unicode: Yes


      • % !TeX directives: Yes


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes


      • Auto-typeset: OSX only


      • Code Completion: Yes, command completion and autofill


      • Code Folding: No


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, supports PDF


      • Project Management: Yes, included files opened automatically




      enter image description here





      Both




      • Document outline (navigatable table of sections, subsection, etc)

      • Auto-detection of typesetting chain (bibtex, makeindex, etc.)

      • Global search

      • Biber support


      OSX




      • Custom typeset scripts

      • Snippets and code macros


      iOS




      • Onboard typesetter with support for Virtual fonts, e-TeX and PGF (beamer/tikz).

      • Built in bundle manager


      • Typesetting API to provide typesetting services to other applications






      share|improve this answer





















      • 10





        This should really be higher on the list.

        – lyxicon
        Dec 8 '13 at 7:05






      • 1





        @lyxicon - Yes, this app is awesome.

        – Kiyoshi
        Feb 8 '14 at 15:13






      • 1





        really love this one

        – Runar
        Dec 31 '15 at 5:15






      • 2





        This is the first app for Mac I ever purchased, and I never regretted it.

        – thiagoveloso
        Nov 27 '16 at 10:43






      • 6





        I downloaded the trial version and I did not even need 24 hours to purchase it! It's amazing and it has the best user interface ever. Updates are regular and developers always get back to you whenever you contact them. Recommended 120%.

        – Héctor
        Mar 26 '17 at 14:55














      49












      49








      49








      Texpad — texpad





      • Platforms: Mac (and iOS)


      • License: Commercial


      • Languages: English, German and Japanese


      • Unicode: Yes


      • % !TeX directives: Yes


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes


      • Auto-typeset: OSX only


      • Code Completion: Yes, command completion and autofill


      • Code Folding: No


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, supports PDF


      • Project Management: Yes, included files opened automatically




      enter image description here





      Both




      • Document outline (navigatable table of sections, subsection, etc)

      • Auto-detection of typesetting chain (bibtex, makeindex, etc.)

      • Global search

      • Biber support


      OSX




      • Custom typeset scripts

      • Snippets and code macros


      iOS




      • Onboard typesetter with support for Virtual fonts, e-TeX and PGF (beamer/tikz).

      • Built in bundle manager


      • Typesetting API to provide typesetting services to other applications






      share|improve this answer
















      Texpad — texpad





      • Platforms: Mac (and iOS)


      • License: Commercial


      • Languages: English, German and Japanese


      • Unicode: Yes


      • % !TeX directives: Yes


      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes


      • Auto-typeset: OSX only


      • Code Completion: Yes, command completion and autofill


      • Code Folding: No


      • Spell Checking: Yes


      • SyncTeX: Yes


      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes, supports PDF


      • Project Management: Yes, included files opened automatically




      enter image description here





      Both




      • Document outline (navigatable table of sections, subsection, etc)

      • Auto-detection of typesetting chain (bibtex, makeindex, etc.)

      • Global search

      • Biber support


      OSX




      • Custom typeset scripts

      • Snippets and code macros


      iOS




      • Onboard typesetter with support for Virtual fonts, e-TeX and PGF (beamer/tikz).

      • Built in bundle manager


      • Typesetting API to provide typesetting services to other applications







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited May 19 '18 at 6:02


























      community wiki





      4 revs, 3 users 87%
      VV Texpad









      • 10





        This should really be higher on the list.

        – lyxicon
        Dec 8 '13 at 7:05






      • 1





        @lyxicon - Yes, this app is awesome.

        – Kiyoshi
        Feb 8 '14 at 15:13






      • 1





        really love this one

        – Runar
        Dec 31 '15 at 5:15






      • 2





        This is the first app for Mac I ever purchased, and I never regretted it.

        – thiagoveloso
        Nov 27 '16 at 10:43






      • 6





        I downloaded the trial version and I did not even need 24 hours to purchase it! It's amazing and it has the best user interface ever. Updates are regular and developers always get back to you whenever you contact them. Recommended 120%.

        – Héctor
        Mar 26 '17 at 14:55














      • 10





        This should really be higher on the list.

        – lyxicon
        Dec 8 '13 at 7:05






      • 1





        @lyxicon - Yes, this app is awesome.

        – Kiyoshi
        Feb 8 '14 at 15:13






      • 1





        really love this one

        – Runar
        Dec 31 '15 at 5:15






      • 2





        This is the first app for Mac I ever purchased, and I never regretted it.

        – thiagoveloso
        Nov 27 '16 at 10:43






      • 6





        I downloaded the trial version and I did not even need 24 hours to purchase it! It's amazing and it has the best user interface ever. Updates are regular and developers always get back to you whenever you contact them. Recommended 120%.

        – Héctor
        Mar 26 '17 at 14:55








      10




      10





      This should really be higher on the list.

      – lyxicon
      Dec 8 '13 at 7:05





      This should really be higher on the list.

      – lyxicon
      Dec 8 '13 at 7:05




      1




      1





      @lyxicon - Yes, this app is awesome.

      – Kiyoshi
      Feb 8 '14 at 15:13





      @lyxicon - Yes, this app is awesome.

      – Kiyoshi
      Feb 8 '14 at 15:13




      1




      1





      really love this one

      – Runar
      Dec 31 '15 at 5:15





      really love this one

      – Runar
      Dec 31 '15 at 5:15




      2




      2





      This is the first app for Mac I ever purchased, and I never regretted it.

      – thiagoveloso
      Nov 27 '16 at 10:43





      This is the first app for Mac I ever purchased, and I never regretted it.

      – thiagoveloso
      Nov 27 '16 at 10:43




      6




      6





      I downloaded the trial version and I did not even need 24 hours to purchase it! It's amazing and it has the best user interface ever. Updates are regular and developers always get back to you whenever you contact them. Recommended 120%.

      – Héctor
      Mar 26 '17 at 14:55





      I downloaded the trial version and I did not even need 24 hours to purchase it! It's amazing and it has the best user interface ever. Updates are regular and developers always get back to you whenever you contact them. Recommended 120%.

      – Héctor
      Mar 26 '17 at 14:55











      44















      gedit with the gedit-LaTeX-plugin



      Available for: Windows, Mac, Linux and others

      Open Source
      Unicode: yes
      RTL/bidi: yes





      It has a clean interface and provides: Code Completion, Spell Checking, Syntax Checking and Validation, Outlines, Wizards, BibTeX Integration, Template Editing, User-Defined Snippets and a preconfigured comprehensive build system using rubber (including LaTeX → DVI with source specials for inverse search).



      For my gedit LaTeX suite to be complete, I add two other plugins, first the 'Control your tabs' plugin to get Ctrl-(Shift)-Tab behavior, and also the AutoCompletion plugin which provides automatic suggestions for completion of any word, based on the words already present in the document - it can be a real time saver.





      Temporary edit:
      Currently the plugin is not ready for release with gedit 3. So, if you're running the latest Ubuntu (11.10) or like being cutting edge, you need to manually install the LaTeX-plugin. The easiest way is to download the version you want from here extract and install with the standard ./configure, make, sudo make install sequence. Read the INSTALL file in the archive for more details. You can also get the most recent version of the plugin from their git repository.



      Note: If the ./configure script gives the error "No package ‘gtk+-3.0′ found" then, under Ubuntu, run sudo apt-get install libgtk-3-dev and then try the script again.






      share|improve this answer


























      • Same here. It's actually quite good yet lightweight.

        – Vedran Miletić
        Jul 28 '10 at 11:51











      • I have tried various and keep coming back. Love it!

        – Frank_Zafka
        Jun 14 '11 at 7:45






      • 1





        Why is gedit so overrated about that ?

        – vdegenne
        Feb 27 '13 at 17:27











      • @Simon does this have code folding and tabs to manage multiple files?

        – AlanH
        May 5 '13 at 19:58











      • I personally find it the best editor out there for latex with heavily "bidi" texts. It needs a couple of tweaks and configurations but after a while it works perfectly.

        – Habib
        Sep 23 '18 at 8:09
















      44















      gedit with the gedit-LaTeX-plugin



      Available for: Windows, Mac, Linux and others

      Open Source
      Unicode: yes
      RTL/bidi: yes





      It has a clean interface and provides: Code Completion, Spell Checking, Syntax Checking and Validation, Outlines, Wizards, BibTeX Integration, Template Editing, User-Defined Snippets and a preconfigured comprehensive build system using rubber (including LaTeX → DVI with source specials for inverse search).



      For my gedit LaTeX suite to be complete, I add two other plugins, first the 'Control your tabs' plugin to get Ctrl-(Shift)-Tab behavior, and also the AutoCompletion plugin which provides automatic suggestions for completion of any word, based on the words already present in the document - it can be a real time saver.





      Temporary edit:
      Currently the plugin is not ready for release with gedit 3. So, if you're running the latest Ubuntu (11.10) or like being cutting edge, you need to manually install the LaTeX-plugin. The easiest way is to download the version you want from here extract and install with the standard ./configure, make, sudo make install sequence. Read the INSTALL file in the archive for more details. You can also get the most recent version of the plugin from their git repository.



      Note: If the ./configure script gives the error "No package ‘gtk+-3.0′ found" then, under Ubuntu, run sudo apt-get install libgtk-3-dev and then try the script again.






      share|improve this answer


























      • Same here. It's actually quite good yet lightweight.

        – Vedran Miletić
        Jul 28 '10 at 11:51











      • I have tried various and keep coming back. Love it!

        – Frank_Zafka
        Jun 14 '11 at 7:45






      • 1





        Why is gedit so overrated about that ?

        – vdegenne
        Feb 27 '13 at 17:27











      • @Simon does this have code folding and tabs to manage multiple files?

        – AlanH
        May 5 '13 at 19:58











      • I personally find it the best editor out there for latex with heavily "bidi" texts. It needs a couple of tweaks and configurations but after a while it works perfectly.

        – Habib
        Sep 23 '18 at 8:09














      44












      44








      44








      gedit with the gedit-LaTeX-plugin



      Available for: Windows, Mac, Linux and others

      Open Source
      Unicode: yes
      RTL/bidi: yes





      It has a clean interface and provides: Code Completion, Spell Checking, Syntax Checking and Validation, Outlines, Wizards, BibTeX Integration, Template Editing, User-Defined Snippets and a preconfigured comprehensive build system using rubber (including LaTeX → DVI with source specials for inverse search).



      For my gedit LaTeX suite to be complete, I add two other plugins, first the 'Control your tabs' plugin to get Ctrl-(Shift)-Tab behavior, and also the AutoCompletion plugin which provides automatic suggestions for completion of any word, based on the words already present in the document - it can be a real time saver.





      Temporary edit:
      Currently the plugin is not ready for release with gedit 3. So, if you're running the latest Ubuntu (11.10) or like being cutting edge, you need to manually install the LaTeX-plugin. The easiest way is to download the version you want from here extract and install with the standard ./configure, make, sudo make install sequence. Read the INSTALL file in the archive for more details. You can also get the most recent version of the plugin from their git repository.



      Note: If the ./configure script gives the error "No package ‘gtk+-3.0′ found" then, under Ubuntu, run sudo apt-get install libgtk-3-dev and then try the script again.






      share|improve this answer
















      gedit with the gedit-LaTeX-plugin



      Available for: Windows, Mac, Linux and others

      Open Source
      Unicode: yes
      RTL/bidi: yes





      It has a clean interface and provides: Code Completion, Spell Checking, Syntax Checking and Validation, Outlines, Wizards, BibTeX Integration, Template Editing, User-Defined Snippets and a preconfigured comprehensive build system using rubber (including LaTeX → DVI with source specials for inverse search).



      For my gedit LaTeX suite to be complete, I add two other plugins, first the 'Control your tabs' plugin to get Ctrl-(Shift)-Tab behavior, and also the AutoCompletion plugin which provides automatic suggestions for completion of any word, based on the words already present in the document - it can be a real time saver.





      Temporary edit:
      Currently the plugin is not ready for release with gedit 3. So, if you're running the latest Ubuntu (11.10) or like being cutting edge, you need to manually install the LaTeX-plugin. The easiest way is to download the version you want from here extract and install with the standard ./configure, make, sudo make install sequence. Read the INSTALL file in the archive for more details. You can also get the most recent version of the plugin from their git repository.



      Note: If the ./configure script gives the error "No package ‘gtk+-3.0′ found" then, under Ubuntu, run sudo apt-get install libgtk-3-dev and then try the script again.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Apr 22 '12 at 21:24


























      community wiki





      6 revs, 3 users 68%
      Simon















      • Same here. It's actually quite good yet lightweight.

        – Vedran Miletić
        Jul 28 '10 at 11:51











      • I have tried various and keep coming back. Love it!

        – Frank_Zafka
        Jun 14 '11 at 7:45






      • 1





        Why is gedit so overrated about that ?

        – vdegenne
        Feb 27 '13 at 17:27











      • @Simon does this have code folding and tabs to manage multiple files?

        – AlanH
        May 5 '13 at 19:58











      • I personally find it the best editor out there for latex with heavily "bidi" texts. It needs a couple of tweaks and configurations but after a while it works perfectly.

        – Habib
        Sep 23 '18 at 8:09



















      • Same here. It's actually quite good yet lightweight.

        – Vedran Miletić
        Jul 28 '10 at 11:51











      • I have tried various and keep coming back. Love it!

        – Frank_Zafka
        Jun 14 '11 at 7:45






      • 1





        Why is gedit so overrated about that ?

        – vdegenne
        Feb 27 '13 at 17:27











      • @Simon does this have code folding and tabs to manage multiple files?

        – AlanH
        May 5 '13 at 19:58











      • I personally find it the best editor out there for latex with heavily "bidi" texts. It needs a couple of tweaks and configurations but after a while it works perfectly.

        – Habib
        Sep 23 '18 at 8:09

















      Same here. It's actually quite good yet lightweight.

      – Vedran Miletić
      Jul 28 '10 at 11:51





      Same here. It's actually quite good yet lightweight.

      – Vedran Miletić
      Jul 28 '10 at 11:51













      I have tried various and keep coming back. Love it!

      – Frank_Zafka
      Jun 14 '11 at 7:45





      I have tried various and keep coming back. Love it!

      – Frank_Zafka
      Jun 14 '11 at 7:45




      1




      1





      Why is gedit so overrated about that ?

      – vdegenne
      Feb 27 '13 at 17:27





      Why is gedit so overrated about that ?

      – vdegenne
      Feb 27 '13 at 17:27













      @Simon does this have code folding and tabs to manage multiple files?

      – AlanH
      May 5 '13 at 19:58





      @Simon does this have code folding and tabs to manage multiple files?

      – AlanH
      May 5 '13 at 19:58













      I personally find it the best editor out there for latex with heavily "bidi" texts. It needs a couple of tweaks and configurations but after a while it works perfectly.

      – Habib
      Sep 23 '18 at 8:09





      I personally find it the best editor out there for latex with heavily "bidi" texts. It needs a couple of tweaks and configurations but after a while it works perfectly.

      – Habib
      Sep 23 '18 at 8:09











      38














      TextMate



      Available for: Mac

      Commercial (Not anymore since version 2.0)





      With OS X I use TextMate with MacTeX. Now I don't want to change OS X for Linux only because I work with TextMate. It's powerful like vim and emacs. It's not free 45 euros. You can do all what you want and you can use and define snippets, macros, commands with shell programming or python or ruby. You can use it for mails or you can create HTML pages or you can programming with R, or Ruby. Perhaps to like this editor you need to learn a programming language like ruby or python (Perl and bash can be used). You can try it during one month for free.



      Some screenshots:

      Click image to enlarge

      In this screenshot, you can see the bundles and in the LaTeX bundle you can see some commands and macros. You can define your personal bundle like my "latex author", you can work with the terminal from TextMate. You can find some movies on the net, to see how to work with TextMate.







      EDIT: Since version 2.0, TextMate has gone open source, here it is the link to Github.






      share|improve this answer


























      • How do you view your compiled source?

        – Alan Munn
        May 31 '11 at 22:56











      • Command R = Typset & View (the first item of the last screenshot) You have preferences to use pdflatex or latex, xetex etc. but you can create your personal script

        – Alain Matthes
        Jun 1 '11 at 4:45













      • Sorry, that wasn't really what I meant. You need some extra program to view the PDF, right? I was asking about how that works. (e.g. is there source/pdf synch?)

        – Alan Munn
        Jun 1 '11 at 10:39











      • @Alan Ok ! I use Skim it's possible to synchronize tex files and pdf. Some users use TexShop to view the pdfs. Sometimes I use Adobe Reader but I prefer Skim. It's possible to use TextMate, but this is very elementary.

        – Alain Matthes
        Jun 1 '11 at 10:58













      • The new version 2 is not commercial anymore.

        – Manuel
        Nov 21 '12 at 18:25
















      38














      TextMate



      Available for: Mac

      Commercial (Not anymore since version 2.0)





      With OS X I use TextMate with MacTeX. Now I don't want to change OS X for Linux only because I work with TextMate. It's powerful like vim and emacs. It's not free 45 euros. You can do all what you want and you can use and define snippets, macros, commands with shell programming or python or ruby. You can use it for mails or you can create HTML pages or you can programming with R, or Ruby. Perhaps to like this editor you need to learn a programming language like ruby or python (Perl and bash can be used). You can try it during one month for free.



      Some screenshots:

      Click image to enlarge

      In this screenshot, you can see the bundles and in the LaTeX bundle you can see some commands and macros. You can define your personal bundle like my "latex author", you can work with the terminal from TextMate. You can find some movies on the net, to see how to work with TextMate.







      EDIT: Since version 2.0, TextMate has gone open source, here it is the link to Github.






      share|improve this answer


























      • How do you view your compiled source?

        – Alan Munn
        May 31 '11 at 22:56











      • Command R = Typset & View (the first item of the last screenshot) You have preferences to use pdflatex or latex, xetex etc. but you can create your personal script

        – Alain Matthes
        Jun 1 '11 at 4:45













      • Sorry, that wasn't really what I meant. You need some extra program to view the PDF, right? I was asking about how that works. (e.g. is there source/pdf synch?)

        – Alan Munn
        Jun 1 '11 at 10:39











      • @Alan Ok ! I use Skim it's possible to synchronize tex files and pdf. Some users use TexShop to view the pdfs. Sometimes I use Adobe Reader but I prefer Skim. It's possible to use TextMate, but this is very elementary.

        – Alain Matthes
        Jun 1 '11 at 10:58













      • The new version 2 is not commercial anymore.

        – Manuel
        Nov 21 '12 at 18:25














      38












      38








      38







      TextMate



      Available for: Mac

      Commercial (Not anymore since version 2.0)





      With OS X I use TextMate with MacTeX. Now I don't want to change OS X for Linux only because I work with TextMate. It's powerful like vim and emacs. It's not free 45 euros. You can do all what you want and you can use and define snippets, macros, commands with shell programming or python or ruby. You can use it for mails or you can create HTML pages or you can programming with R, or Ruby. Perhaps to like this editor you need to learn a programming language like ruby or python (Perl and bash can be used). You can try it during one month for free.



      Some screenshots:

      Click image to enlarge

      In this screenshot, you can see the bundles and in the LaTeX bundle you can see some commands and macros. You can define your personal bundle like my "latex author", you can work with the terminal from TextMate. You can find some movies on the net, to see how to work with TextMate.







      EDIT: Since version 2.0, TextMate has gone open source, here it is the link to Github.






      share|improve this answer















      TextMate



      Available for: Mac

      Commercial (Not anymore since version 2.0)





      With OS X I use TextMate with MacTeX. Now I don't want to change OS X for Linux only because I work with TextMate. It's powerful like vim and emacs. It's not free 45 euros. You can do all what you want and you can use and define snippets, macros, commands with shell programming or python or ruby. You can use it for mails or you can create HTML pages or you can programming with R, or Ruby. Perhaps to like this editor you need to learn a programming language like ruby or python (Perl and bash can be used). You can try it during one month for free.



      Some screenshots:

      Click image to enlarge

      In this screenshot, you can see the bundles and in the LaTeX bundle you can see some commands and macros. You can define your personal bundle like my "latex author", you can work with the terminal from TextMate. You can find some movies on the net, to see how to work with TextMate.







      EDIT: Since version 2.0, TextMate has gone open source, here it is the link to Github.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Feb 11 '13 at 22:32


























      community wiki





      4 revs, 4 users 46%
      Alain Matthes















      • How do you view your compiled source?

        – Alan Munn
        May 31 '11 at 22:56











      • Command R = Typset & View (the first item of the last screenshot) You have preferences to use pdflatex or latex, xetex etc. but you can create your personal script

        – Alain Matthes
        Jun 1 '11 at 4:45













      • Sorry, that wasn't really what I meant. You need some extra program to view the PDF, right? I was asking about how that works. (e.g. is there source/pdf synch?)

        – Alan Munn
        Jun 1 '11 at 10:39











      • @Alan Ok ! I use Skim it's possible to synchronize tex files and pdf. Some users use TexShop to view the pdfs. Sometimes I use Adobe Reader but I prefer Skim. It's possible to use TextMate, but this is very elementary.

        – Alain Matthes
        Jun 1 '11 at 10:58













      • The new version 2 is not commercial anymore.

        – Manuel
        Nov 21 '12 at 18:25



















      • How do you view your compiled source?

        – Alan Munn
        May 31 '11 at 22:56











      • Command R = Typset & View (the first item of the last screenshot) You have preferences to use pdflatex or latex, xetex etc. but you can create your personal script

        – Alain Matthes
        Jun 1 '11 at 4:45













      • Sorry, that wasn't really what I meant. You need some extra program to view the PDF, right? I was asking about how that works. (e.g. is there source/pdf synch?)

        – Alan Munn
        Jun 1 '11 at 10:39











      • @Alan Ok ! I use Skim it's possible to synchronize tex files and pdf. Some users use TexShop to view the pdfs. Sometimes I use Adobe Reader but I prefer Skim. It's possible to use TextMate, but this is very elementary.

        – Alain Matthes
        Jun 1 '11 at 10:58













      • The new version 2 is not commercial anymore.

        – Manuel
        Nov 21 '12 at 18:25

















      How do you view your compiled source?

      – Alan Munn
      May 31 '11 at 22:56





      How do you view your compiled source?

      – Alan Munn
      May 31 '11 at 22:56













      Command R = Typset & View (the first item of the last screenshot) You have preferences to use pdflatex or latex, xetex etc. but you can create your personal script

      – Alain Matthes
      Jun 1 '11 at 4:45







      Command R = Typset & View (the first item of the last screenshot) You have preferences to use pdflatex or latex, xetex etc. but you can create your personal script

      – Alain Matthes
      Jun 1 '11 at 4:45















      Sorry, that wasn't really what I meant. You need some extra program to view the PDF, right? I was asking about how that works. (e.g. is there source/pdf synch?)

      – Alan Munn
      Jun 1 '11 at 10:39





      Sorry, that wasn't really what I meant. You need some extra program to view the PDF, right? I was asking about how that works. (e.g. is there source/pdf synch?)

      – Alan Munn
      Jun 1 '11 at 10:39













      @Alan Ok ! I use Skim it's possible to synchronize tex files and pdf. Some users use TexShop to view the pdfs. Sometimes I use Adobe Reader but I prefer Skim. It's possible to use TextMate, but this is very elementary.

      – Alain Matthes
      Jun 1 '11 at 10:58







      @Alan Ok ! I use Skim it's possible to synchronize tex files and pdf. Some users use TexShop to view the pdfs. Sometimes I use Adobe Reader but I prefer Skim. It's possible to use TextMate, but this is very elementary.

      – Alain Matthes
      Jun 1 '11 at 10:58















      The new version 2 is not commercial anymore.

      – Manuel
      Nov 21 '12 at 18:25





      The new version 2 is not commercial anymore.

      – Manuel
      Nov 21 '12 at 18:25











      36














      KtikZ



      Available for: Linux and Windows

      Open Source





      I am a big fan of the Linux editor Ktikz. By default Ktikz is meant to be a real-time editor for TikZ pictures. However, one can edit any type of environment just by editing the default template. Moreover, by creating a template consisting only of the text



      <>


      one can get real-time compilation of LaTeX documents.



      I usually restrict my use of Ktikz to editing Beamer presentations or drawing TikZ pictures (or other projects where the visual output needs extra attention or tweaking). For other purposes the real-time compilation can be more of a distraction than it is worth.



      For windows users: install QtikZ (also available in the link). Tested with windows 7 and miktex 2.9, and it works with no problem.






      share|improve this answer


























      • I recently made a 150 pages document (class notes) entirely in LaTeX and TikZ. It was a great help for complicated drawings.

        – fabikw
        Nov 12 '10 at 19:20











      • This is great! I just used it on windows and it works perfectly!

        – Heidar
        Oct 15 '11 at 15:53











      • Recently, I updated my texlive2015 to the version Texlive2018. However,strange things happened. Qtikz worked perfectly with texlive2015,but it didn't work with texlive 2018. Though I add the correct path of pdflatex and pdftops, it still shows that ' could not load LaTeX logfile.' How can I solve this problem? Please

        – user450201
        Jun 10 '18 at 2:07
















      36














      KtikZ



      Available for: Linux and Windows

      Open Source





      I am a big fan of the Linux editor Ktikz. By default Ktikz is meant to be a real-time editor for TikZ pictures. However, one can edit any type of environment just by editing the default template. Moreover, by creating a template consisting only of the text



      <>


      one can get real-time compilation of LaTeX documents.



      I usually restrict my use of Ktikz to editing Beamer presentations or drawing TikZ pictures (or other projects where the visual output needs extra attention or tweaking). For other purposes the real-time compilation can be more of a distraction than it is worth.



      For windows users: install QtikZ (also available in the link). Tested with windows 7 and miktex 2.9, and it works with no problem.






      share|improve this answer


























      • I recently made a 150 pages document (class notes) entirely in LaTeX and TikZ. It was a great help for complicated drawings.

        – fabikw
        Nov 12 '10 at 19:20











      • This is great! I just used it on windows and it works perfectly!

        – Heidar
        Oct 15 '11 at 15:53











      • Recently, I updated my texlive2015 to the version Texlive2018. However,strange things happened. Qtikz worked perfectly with texlive2015,but it didn't work with texlive 2018. Though I add the correct path of pdflatex and pdftops, it still shows that ' could not load LaTeX logfile.' How can I solve this problem? Please

        – user450201
        Jun 10 '18 at 2:07














      36












      36








      36







      KtikZ



      Available for: Linux and Windows

      Open Source





      I am a big fan of the Linux editor Ktikz. By default Ktikz is meant to be a real-time editor for TikZ pictures. However, one can edit any type of environment just by editing the default template. Moreover, by creating a template consisting only of the text



      <>


      one can get real-time compilation of LaTeX documents.



      I usually restrict my use of Ktikz to editing Beamer presentations or drawing TikZ pictures (or other projects where the visual output needs extra attention or tweaking). For other purposes the real-time compilation can be more of a distraction than it is worth.



      For windows users: install QtikZ (also available in the link). Tested with windows 7 and miktex 2.9, and it works with no problem.






      share|improve this answer















      KtikZ



      Available for: Linux and Windows

      Open Source





      I am a big fan of the Linux editor Ktikz. By default Ktikz is meant to be a real-time editor for TikZ pictures. However, one can edit any type of environment just by editing the default template. Moreover, by creating a template consisting only of the text



      <>


      one can get real-time compilation of LaTeX documents.



      I usually restrict my use of Ktikz to editing Beamer presentations or drawing TikZ pictures (or other projects where the visual output needs extra attention or tweaking). For other purposes the real-time compilation can be more of a distraction than it is worth.



      For windows users: install QtikZ (also available in the link). Tested with windows 7 and miktex 2.9, and it works with no problem.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Sep 28 '12 at 3:39


























      community wiki





      4 revs, 3 users 45%
      Caramdir















      • I recently made a 150 pages document (class notes) entirely in LaTeX and TikZ. It was a great help for complicated drawings.

        – fabikw
        Nov 12 '10 at 19:20











      • This is great! I just used it on windows and it works perfectly!

        – Heidar
        Oct 15 '11 at 15:53











      • Recently, I updated my texlive2015 to the version Texlive2018. However,strange things happened. Qtikz worked perfectly with texlive2015,but it didn't work with texlive 2018. Though I add the correct path of pdflatex and pdftops, it still shows that ' could not load LaTeX logfile.' How can I solve this problem? Please

        – user450201
        Jun 10 '18 at 2:07



















      • I recently made a 150 pages document (class notes) entirely in LaTeX and TikZ. It was a great help for complicated drawings.

        – fabikw
        Nov 12 '10 at 19:20











      • This is great! I just used it on windows and it works perfectly!

        – Heidar
        Oct 15 '11 at 15:53











      • Recently, I updated my texlive2015 to the version Texlive2018. However,strange things happened. Qtikz worked perfectly with texlive2015,but it didn't work with texlive 2018. Though I add the correct path of pdflatex and pdftops, it still shows that ' could not load LaTeX logfile.' How can I solve this problem? Please

        – user450201
        Jun 10 '18 at 2:07

















      I recently made a 150 pages document (class notes) entirely in LaTeX and TikZ. It was a great help for complicated drawings.

      – fabikw
      Nov 12 '10 at 19:20





      I recently made a 150 pages document (class notes) entirely in LaTeX and TikZ. It was a great help for complicated drawings.

      – fabikw
      Nov 12 '10 at 19:20













      This is great! I just used it on windows and it works perfectly!

      – Heidar
      Oct 15 '11 at 15:53





      This is great! I just used it on windows and it works perfectly!

      – Heidar
      Oct 15 '11 at 15:53













      Recently, I updated my texlive2015 to the version Texlive2018. However,strange things happened. Qtikz worked perfectly with texlive2015,but it didn't work with texlive 2018. Though I add the correct path of pdflatex and pdftops, it still shows that ' could not load LaTeX logfile.' How can I solve this problem? Please

      – user450201
      Jun 10 '18 at 2:07





      Recently, I updated my texlive2015 to the version Texlive2018. However,strange things happened. Qtikz worked perfectly with texlive2015,but it didn't work with texlive 2018. Though I add the correct path of pdflatex and pdftops, it still shows that ' could not load LaTeX logfile.' How can I solve this problem? Please

      – user450201
      Jun 10 '18 at 2:07











      32















      Vim with vimtex — vim





      • Platforms: GNU/Linux, MS Windows, Mac, wherever you get Vim with clientserver and a TeX distribution with latexmk running


      • License: Vim License (Vim), MIT License (vimtex)


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi support: Partial


      • % !TEX directives: Only % !TEX root, however, Vim by itself supports many things such as modelines and buffer-local variables


      • Syntax highlighting: Yes, customizable via colorschemes; further support for the listings package, minted package, as well as some minor improvements on top of the built in Vim syntax plugin


      • Code completion: Yes; added completion of references and labels via omni-completion, auto-completion available with e.g. neocomplete and YouCompleteMe


      • Code folding: Yes (according to document's structure)


      • Spell checking: Yes (built into Vim)


      • SyncTeX: Yes (additional hacks for viewers which do not use SyncTeX available)


      • Built-in output viewer: No


      • Project management: vimtex supports multi-file documents, but does not provide a way to manage a project per se




      I believe Vim needs no introduction. vimtex can be seen as a continuation of LaTeX-Box and is probably the best TeX plugin available for Vim at the moment of speaking. Compilation is handled very smoothly through latexmk. Most popular PDF viewers are supported (including some which by themselves cannot do forward searching).



      See a list of features here or read the docs. Unlike LaTeX-Suite, vimtex is a more modern plugin and encourages a much less monolithic design. For example, it provides an omni-complete function for references and labels, but leaves it up to other, more specialized plugins, to automatically call this function.






      share|improve this answer


























      • I think github.com/xuhdev/vim-latex-live-preview can be used as a built-in output viewer

        – Fabian Pijcke
        Mar 18 '17 at 9:09
















      32















      Vim with vimtex — vim





      • Platforms: GNU/Linux, MS Windows, Mac, wherever you get Vim with clientserver and a TeX distribution with latexmk running


      • License: Vim License (Vim), MIT License (vimtex)


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi support: Partial


      • % !TEX directives: Only % !TEX root, however, Vim by itself supports many things such as modelines and buffer-local variables


      • Syntax highlighting: Yes, customizable via colorschemes; further support for the listings package, minted package, as well as some minor improvements on top of the built in Vim syntax plugin


      • Code completion: Yes; added completion of references and labels via omni-completion, auto-completion available with e.g. neocomplete and YouCompleteMe


      • Code folding: Yes (according to document's structure)


      • Spell checking: Yes (built into Vim)


      • SyncTeX: Yes (additional hacks for viewers which do not use SyncTeX available)


      • Built-in output viewer: No


      • Project management: vimtex supports multi-file documents, but does not provide a way to manage a project per se




      I believe Vim needs no introduction. vimtex can be seen as a continuation of LaTeX-Box and is probably the best TeX plugin available for Vim at the moment of speaking. Compilation is handled very smoothly through latexmk. Most popular PDF viewers are supported (including some which by themselves cannot do forward searching).



      See a list of features here or read the docs. Unlike LaTeX-Suite, vimtex is a more modern plugin and encourages a much less monolithic design. For example, it provides an omni-complete function for references and labels, but leaves it up to other, more specialized plugins, to automatically call this function.






      share|improve this answer


























      • I think github.com/xuhdev/vim-latex-live-preview can be used as a built-in output viewer

        – Fabian Pijcke
        Mar 18 '17 at 9:09














      32












      32








      32








      Vim with vimtex — vim





      • Platforms: GNU/Linux, MS Windows, Mac, wherever you get Vim with clientserver and a TeX distribution with latexmk running


      • License: Vim License (Vim), MIT License (vimtex)


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi support: Partial


      • % !TEX directives: Only % !TEX root, however, Vim by itself supports many things such as modelines and buffer-local variables


      • Syntax highlighting: Yes, customizable via colorschemes; further support for the listings package, minted package, as well as some minor improvements on top of the built in Vim syntax plugin


      • Code completion: Yes; added completion of references and labels via omni-completion, auto-completion available with e.g. neocomplete and YouCompleteMe


      • Code folding: Yes (according to document's structure)


      • Spell checking: Yes (built into Vim)


      • SyncTeX: Yes (additional hacks for viewers which do not use SyncTeX available)


      • Built-in output viewer: No


      • Project management: vimtex supports multi-file documents, but does not provide a way to manage a project per se




      I believe Vim needs no introduction. vimtex can be seen as a continuation of LaTeX-Box and is probably the best TeX plugin available for Vim at the moment of speaking. Compilation is handled very smoothly through latexmk. Most popular PDF viewers are supported (including some which by themselves cannot do forward searching).



      See a list of features here or read the docs. Unlike LaTeX-Suite, vimtex is a more modern plugin and encourages a much less monolithic design. For example, it provides an omni-complete function for references and labels, but leaves it up to other, more specialized plugins, to automatically call this function.






      share|improve this answer
















      Vim with vimtex — vim





      • Platforms: GNU/Linux, MS Windows, Mac, wherever you get Vim with clientserver and a TeX distribution with latexmk running


      • License: Vim License (Vim), MIT License (vimtex)


      • Unicode: Yes


      • RTL/bidi support: Partial


      • % !TEX directives: Only % !TEX root, however, Vim by itself supports many things such as modelines and buffer-local variables


      • Syntax highlighting: Yes, customizable via colorschemes; further support for the listings package, minted package, as well as some minor improvements on top of the built in Vim syntax plugin


      • Code completion: Yes; added completion of references and labels via omni-completion, auto-completion available with e.g. neocomplete and YouCompleteMe


      • Code folding: Yes (according to document's structure)


      • Spell checking: Yes (built into Vim)


      • SyncTeX: Yes (additional hacks for viewers which do not use SyncTeX available)


      • Built-in output viewer: No


      • Project management: vimtex supports multi-file documents, but does not provide a way to manage a project per se




      I believe Vim needs no introduction. vimtex can be seen as a continuation of LaTeX-Box and is probably the best TeX plugin available for Vim at the moment of speaking. Compilation is handled very smoothly through latexmk. Most popular PDF viewers are supported (including some which by themselves cannot do forward searching).



      See a list of features here or read the docs. Unlike LaTeX-Suite, vimtex is a more modern plugin and encourages a much less monolithic design. For example, it provides an omni-complete function for references and labels, but leaves it up to other, more specialized plugins, to automatically call this function.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Dec 7 '15 at 6:36


























      community wiki





      3 revs, 2 users 98%
      d125q














      • I think github.com/xuhdev/vim-latex-live-preview can be used as a built-in output viewer

        – Fabian Pijcke
        Mar 18 '17 at 9:09



















      • I think github.com/xuhdev/vim-latex-live-preview can be used as a built-in output viewer

        – Fabian Pijcke
        Mar 18 '17 at 9:09

















      I think github.com/xuhdev/vim-latex-live-preview can be used as a built-in output viewer

      – Fabian Pijcke
      Mar 18 '17 at 9:09





      I think github.com/xuhdev/vim-latex-live-preview can be used as a built-in output viewer

      – Fabian Pijcke
      Mar 18 '17 at 9:09











      26














      LEd



      Available for: Windows

      Freeware



      Note: Development of LEd has stopped, and the last version is from 2009.





      I can recommend LEd. It is Windows only and is just not working on some computers, still it is very functional; standard things like spelling, tree views, macros are present, while it has some more nice functions. I especially like a toolbar for beamer, but also noticeable is an option in search which can be used to highlight occurrences of a few queries at a time (regex supported of course).



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer





















      • 8





        I used LEd for a while and liked a lot of the features, but eventually I ran into too many bugs and moved to TeXnicCenter.

        – fryguybob
        Jul 27 '10 at 16:50






      • 1





        I wish it were supported (at least bug fixing, making it run on Windows7,...) properly. It is a great editor.

        – Skarab
        Jan 20 '12 at 9:57
















      26














      LEd



      Available for: Windows

      Freeware



      Note: Development of LEd has stopped, and the last version is from 2009.





      I can recommend LEd. It is Windows only and is just not working on some computers, still it is very functional; standard things like spelling, tree views, macros are present, while it has some more nice functions. I especially like a toolbar for beamer, but also noticeable is an option in search which can be used to highlight occurrences of a few queries at a time (regex supported of course).



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer





















      • 8





        I used LEd for a while and liked a lot of the features, but eventually I ran into too many bugs and moved to TeXnicCenter.

        – fryguybob
        Jul 27 '10 at 16:50






      • 1





        I wish it were supported (at least bug fixing, making it run on Windows7,...) properly. It is a great editor.

        – Skarab
        Jan 20 '12 at 9:57














      26












      26








      26







      LEd



      Available for: Windows

      Freeware



      Note: Development of LEd has stopped, and the last version is from 2009.





      I can recommend LEd. It is Windows only and is just not working on some computers, still it is very functional; standard things like spelling, tree views, macros are present, while it has some more nice functions. I especially like a toolbar for beamer, but also noticeable is an option in search which can be used to highlight occurrences of a few queries at a time (regex supported of course).



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer















      LEd



      Available for: Windows

      Freeware



      Note: Development of LEd has stopped, and the last version is from 2009.





      I can recommend LEd. It is Windows only and is just not working on some computers, still it is very functional; standard things like spelling, tree views, macros are present, while it has some more nice functions. I especially like a toolbar for beamer, but also noticeable is an option in search which can be used to highlight occurrences of a few queries at a time (regex supported of course).



      enter image description here







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Jul 21 '15 at 9:57


























      community wiki





      4 revs, 4 users 40%
      Caramdir









      • 8





        I used LEd for a while and liked a lot of the features, but eventually I ran into too many bugs and moved to TeXnicCenter.

        – fryguybob
        Jul 27 '10 at 16:50






      • 1





        I wish it were supported (at least bug fixing, making it run on Windows7,...) properly. It is a great editor.

        – Skarab
        Jan 20 '12 at 9:57














      • 8





        I used LEd for a while and liked a lot of the features, but eventually I ran into too many bugs and moved to TeXnicCenter.

        – fryguybob
        Jul 27 '10 at 16:50






      • 1





        I wish it were supported (at least bug fixing, making it run on Windows7,...) properly. It is a great editor.

        – Skarab
        Jan 20 '12 at 9:57








      8




      8





      I used LEd for a while and liked a lot of the features, but eventually I ran into too many bugs and moved to TeXnicCenter.

      – fryguybob
      Jul 27 '10 at 16:50





      I used LEd for a while and liked a lot of the features, but eventually I ran into too many bugs and moved to TeXnicCenter.

      – fryguybob
      Jul 27 '10 at 16:50




      1




      1





      I wish it were supported (at least bug fixing, making it run on Windows7,...) properly. It is a great editor.

      – Skarab
      Jan 20 '12 at 9:57





      I wish it were supported (at least bug fixing, making it run on Windows7,...) properly. It is a great editor.

      – Skarab
      Jan 20 '12 at 9:57











      23














      LaTeXila





      • Available for: Linux

      • Open source


      • Unicode support: Yes




      LaTeXila is an Integrated LaTeX Environment for the GNOME desktop. It has a very nice and clean interface. Its available in Ubuntu software center. You can preview what you write, when ever you want.



      It has some "magic" comments for making todonotes, which will show up in the structure panel on the left hand side. These are %TODO and %FIXME, in both cases followed by some text (if there is no text, it won't show in the panel).



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer






























        23














        LaTeXila





        • Available for: Linux

        • Open source


        • Unicode support: Yes




        LaTeXila is an Integrated LaTeX Environment for the GNOME desktop. It has a very nice and clean interface. Its available in Ubuntu software center. You can preview what you write, when ever you want.



        It has some "magic" comments for making todonotes, which will show up in the structure panel on the left hand side. These are %TODO and %FIXME, in both cases followed by some text (if there is no text, it won't show in the panel).



        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer




























          23












          23








          23







          LaTeXila





          • Available for: Linux

          • Open source


          • Unicode support: Yes




          LaTeXila is an Integrated LaTeX Environment for the GNOME desktop. It has a very nice and clean interface. Its available in Ubuntu software center. You can preview what you write, when ever you want.



          It has some "magic" comments for making todonotes, which will show up in the structure panel on the left hand side. These are %TODO and %FIXME, in both cases followed by some text (if there is no text, it won't show in the panel).



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer















          LaTeXila





          • Available for: Linux

          • Open source


          • Unicode support: Yes




          LaTeXila is an Integrated LaTeX Environment for the GNOME desktop. It has a very nice and clean interface. Its available in Ubuntu software center. You can preview what you write, when ever you want.



          It has some "magic" comments for making todonotes, which will show up in the structure panel on the left hand side. These are %TODO and %FIXME, in both cases followed by some text (if there is no text, it won't show in the panel).



          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Jan 16 '13 at 20:12


























          community wiki





          2 revs, 2 users 57%
          AIB

























              23















              Latexian - Discontinued



              Available for: Mac

              Commercial - $9.99 on App Store





              Latexian was made by Taco Software, a company which has now closed. It was available Mac OS X 10.6 or higher (including Mavericks). Limited support is still being provided for those that previously purchased their software.



              This is a very lean editing environment at its core, with many features that can extend its capabilities. One very nice feature is an integrated execution environment that updates a live preview window in near-real time with edits. It is perfect for quick, simple projects.



              Click image to enlarge



              Features (copied from software site)



              OS X Lion & Mountain Lion Features



              For OS X Lion and Mountain Lion users, Latexian has support for Autosave, Resume, Versions, and Full Screen.



              Navigator



              Quickly navigate to chapters, sections, and included files using the Navigator. You can also add your own bookmarks to the Navigator by adding a comment to your document starting with the "!" character.



              Live Preview



              Live Preview allows you to see how your document typesets while you are editing. The PDF preview appears in a split pane and updates automatically.



              Code Completion



              Latexian includes Code Completion for LaTeX and BibTeX documents. When navigating the completion list, a brief description is shown for the selected item.



              Code Folding



              Code Folding allows you to collapse segments of text, making it easier to navigate through your text. Latexian identifies chapters and sections in your document and provides disclosure triangles to fold these in one click. Latexian will remember and restore your folds if you don't edit a document externally.



              Code Clips



              If you ever get tired of copying and pasting frequently used text segments, then Latexian's Code Clips will alleviate your problems. Code Clips allow you to store, manage, and access those text segments more easily. With Code Clips, you can assign keyboard shortcuts (Command + 0-9) to insert a clip into a document. You can also insert clips through Latexian's Code Completion panel.



              Spell Checking



              Latexian includes syntax-aware spell checking, including spell checking while you type. It ignores your LaTeX commands, and highlights errors in your text content.



              Code Coloring



              As you edit your document, Latexian colors your text to make it easier to read and navigate. Coloring is customizable, and Latexian supports coloring for LaTeX and BibTeX documents.



              Console



              Latexian includes an interactive console for presenting the output of the typesetter, and accepting input requested by the typesetter. Error messages are hyperlinked to the document location where the error occurred.



              Find & Batch Find



              Latexian includes advanced Find functionality for searching individual documents or entire projects. Support for regular expressions is included.






              share|improve this answer


























              • I really like their company name :)

                – vettipayyan
                Dec 24 '12 at 12:21






              • 3





                Unfortunately, it seems Taco Software closed shop some time in 2015.

                – talazem
                Jul 28 '15 at 23:42






              • 2





                Unfortunate. They made a nice product.

                – flip
                Jul 29 '15 at 14:18
















              23















              Latexian - Discontinued



              Available for: Mac

              Commercial - $9.99 on App Store





              Latexian was made by Taco Software, a company which has now closed. It was available Mac OS X 10.6 or higher (including Mavericks). Limited support is still being provided for those that previously purchased their software.



              This is a very lean editing environment at its core, with many features that can extend its capabilities. One very nice feature is an integrated execution environment that updates a live preview window in near-real time with edits. It is perfect for quick, simple projects.



              Click image to enlarge



              Features (copied from software site)



              OS X Lion & Mountain Lion Features



              For OS X Lion and Mountain Lion users, Latexian has support for Autosave, Resume, Versions, and Full Screen.



              Navigator



              Quickly navigate to chapters, sections, and included files using the Navigator. You can also add your own bookmarks to the Navigator by adding a comment to your document starting with the "!" character.



              Live Preview



              Live Preview allows you to see how your document typesets while you are editing. The PDF preview appears in a split pane and updates automatically.



              Code Completion



              Latexian includes Code Completion for LaTeX and BibTeX documents. When navigating the completion list, a brief description is shown for the selected item.



              Code Folding



              Code Folding allows you to collapse segments of text, making it easier to navigate through your text. Latexian identifies chapters and sections in your document and provides disclosure triangles to fold these in one click. Latexian will remember and restore your folds if you don't edit a document externally.



              Code Clips



              If you ever get tired of copying and pasting frequently used text segments, then Latexian's Code Clips will alleviate your problems. Code Clips allow you to store, manage, and access those text segments more easily. With Code Clips, you can assign keyboard shortcuts (Command + 0-9) to insert a clip into a document. You can also insert clips through Latexian's Code Completion panel.



              Spell Checking



              Latexian includes syntax-aware spell checking, including spell checking while you type. It ignores your LaTeX commands, and highlights errors in your text content.



              Code Coloring



              As you edit your document, Latexian colors your text to make it easier to read and navigate. Coloring is customizable, and Latexian supports coloring for LaTeX and BibTeX documents.



              Console



              Latexian includes an interactive console for presenting the output of the typesetter, and accepting input requested by the typesetter. Error messages are hyperlinked to the document location where the error occurred.



              Find & Batch Find



              Latexian includes advanced Find functionality for searching individual documents or entire projects. Support for regular expressions is included.






              share|improve this answer


























              • I really like their company name :)

                – vettipayyan
                Dec 24 '12 at 12:21






              • 3





                Unfortunately, it seems Taco Software closed shop some time in 2015.

                – talazem
                Jul 28 '15 at 23:42






              • 2





                Unfortunate. They made a nice product.

                – flip
                Jul 29 '15 at 14:18














              23












              23








              23








              Latexian - Discontinued



              Available for: Mac

              Commercial - $9.99 on App Store





              Latexian was made by Taco Software, a company which has now closed. It was available Mac OS X 10.6 or higher (including Mavericks). Limited support is still being provided for those that previously purchased their software.



              This is a very lean editing environment at its core, with many features that can extend its capabilities. One very nice feature is an integrated execution environment that updates a live preview window in near-real time with edits. It is perfect for quick, simple projects.



              Click image to enlarge



              Features (copied from software site)



              OS X Lion & Mountain Lion Features



              For OS X Lion and Mountain Lion users, Latexian has support for Autosave, Resume, Versions, and Full Screen.



              Navigator



              Quickly navigate to chapters, sections, and included files using the Navigator. You can also add your own bookmarks to the Navigator by adding a comment to your document starting with the "!" character.



              Live Preview



              Live Preview allows you to see how your document typesets while you are editing. The PDF preview appears in a split pane and updates automatically.



              Code Completion



              Latexian includes Code Completion for LaTeX and BibTeX documents. When navigating the completion list, a brief description is shown for the selected item.



              Code Folding



              Code Folding allows you to collapse segments of text, making it easier to navigate through your text. Latexian identifies chapters and sections in your document and provides disclosure triangles to fold these in one click. Latexian will remember and restore your folds if you don't edit a document externally.



              Code Clips



              If you ever get tired of copying and pasting frequently used text segments, then Latexian's Code Clips will alleviate your problems. Code Clips allow you to store, manage, and access those text segments more easily. With Code Clips, you can assign keyboard shortcuts (Command + 0-9) to insert a clip into a document. You can also insert clips through Latexian's Code Completion panel.



              Spell Checking



              Latexian includes syntax-aware spell checking, including spell checking while you type. It ignores your LaTeX commands, and highlights errors in your text content.



              Code Coloring



              As you edit your document, Latexian colors your text to make it easier to read and navigate. Coloring is customizable, and Latexian supports coloring for LaTeX and BibTeX documents.



              Console



              Latexian includes an interactive console for presenting the output of the typesetter, and accepting input requested by the typesetter. Error messages are hyperlinked to the document location where the error occurred.



              Find & Batch Find



              Latexian includes advanced Find functionality for searching individual documents or entire projects. Support for regular expressions is included.






              share|improve this answer
















              Latexian - Discontinued



              Available for: Mac

              Commercial - $9.99 on App Store





              Latexian was made by Taco Software, a company which has now closed. It was available Mac OS X 10.6 or higher (including Mavericks). Limited support is still being provided for those that previously purchased their software.



              This is a very lean editing environment at its core, with many features that can extend its capabilities. One very nice feature is an integrated execution environment that updates a live preview window in near-real time with edits. It is perfect for quick, simple projects.



              Click image to enlarge



              Features (copied from software site)



              OS X Lion & Mountain Lion Features



              For OS X Lion and Mountain Lion users, Latexian has support for Autosave, Resume, Versions, and Full Screen.



              Navigator



              Quickly navigate to chapters, sections, and included files using the Navigator. You can also add your own bookmarks to the Navigator by adding a comment to your document starting with the "!" character.



              Live Preview



              Live Preview allows you to see how your document typesets while you are editing. The PDF preview appears in a split pane and updates automatically.



              Code Completion



              Latexian includes Code Completion for LaTeX and BibTeX documents. When navigating the completion list, a brief description is shown for the selected item.



              Code Folding



              Code Folding allows you to collapse segments of text, making it easier to navigate through your text. Latexian identifies chapters and sections in your document and provides disclosure triangles to fold these in one click. Latexian will remember and restore your folds if you don't edit a document externally.



              Code Clips



              If you ever get tired of copying and pasting frequently used text segments, then Latexian's Code Clips will alleviate your problems. Code Clips allow you to store, manage, and access those text segments more easily. With Code Clips, you can assign keyboard shortcuts (Command + 0-9) to insert a clip into a document. You can also insert clips through Latexian's Code Completion panel.



              Spell Checking



              Latexian includes syntax-aware spell checking, including spell checking while you type. It ignores your LaTeX commands, and highlights errors in your text content.



              Code Coloring



              As you edit your document, Latexian colors your text to make it easier to read and navigate. Coloring is customizable, and Latexian supports coloring for LaTeX and BibTeX documents.



              Console



              Latexian includes an interactive console for presenting the output of the typesetter, and accepting input requested by the typesetter. Error messages are hyperlinked to the document location where the error occurred.



              Find & Batch Find



              Latexian includes advanced Find functionality for searching individual documents or entire projects. Support for regular expressions is included.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Mar 4 '16 at 1:19


























              community wiki





              10 revs, 6 users 36%
              cslstr














              • I really like their company name :)

                – vettipayyan
                Dec 24 '12 at 12:21






              • 3





                Unfortunately, it seems Taco Software closed shop some time in 2015.

                – talazem
                Jul 28 '15 at 23:42






              • 2





                Unfortunate. They made a nice product.

                – flip
                Jul 29 '15 at 14:18



















              • I really like their company name :)

                – vettipayyan
                Dec 24 '12 at 12:21






              • 3





                Unfortunately, it seems Taco Software closed shop some time in 2015.

                – talazem
                Jul 28 '15 at 23:42






              • 2





                Unfortunate. They made a nice product.

                – flip
                Jul 29 '15 at 14:18

















              I really like their company name :)

              – vettipayyan
              Dec 24 '12 at 12:21





              I really like their company name :)

              – vettipayyan
              Dec 24 '12 at 12:21




              3




              3





              Unfortunately, it seems Taco Software closed shop some time in 2015.

              – talazem
              Jul 28 '15 at 23:42





              Unfortunately, it seems Taco Software closed shop some time in 2015.

              – talazem
              Jul 28 '15 at 23:42




              2




              2





              Unfortunate. They made a nice product.

              – flip
              Jul 29 '15 at 14:18





              Unfortunate. They made a nice product.

              – flip
              Jul 29 '15 at 14:18











              21














              WinShell



              Available For: Windows

              FreeWare






              WinShell is a free multilingual integrated development environment (IDE) for LaTeX and TeX. The program includes a text editor, syntax highlighting, project management, spell checking, a table wizard, BibTeX support, Unicode support, different toolbars and user configuration options. It is not a LaTeX system; an additional LaTeX package is required.




              WinShell screenshot
              Click image to enlarge






              share|improve this answer





















              • 2





                Finally, someone mentioned it. I've tried almost all IDEs mentioned thus far, and only WinShell managed to stick, and is now my editor of choice. There are a few handy options that I miss, though (namely, including a fancy symbol from a menu if you've forgotten the name -- the way TexnicCenter does).

                – Martin Tapankov
                Aug 19 '10 at 5:47






              • 1





                What I found useful in winshell is that it is portable and has unicode support.

                – fabikw
                Nov 12 '10 at 16:46
















              21














              WinShell



              Available For: Windows

              FreeWare






              WinShell is a free multilingual integrated development environment (IDE) for LaTeX and TeX. The program includes a text editor, syntax highlighting, project management, spell checking, a table wizard, BibTeX support, Unicode support, different toolbars and user configuration options. It is not a LaTeX system; an additional LaTeX package is required.




              WinShell screenshot
              Click image to enlarge






              share|improve this answer





















              • 2





                Finally, someone mentioned it. I've tried almost all IDEs mentioned thus far, and only WinShell managed to stick, and is now my editor of choice. There are a few handy options that I miss, though (namely, including a fancy symbol from a menu if you've forgotten the name -- the way TexnicCenter does).

                – Martin Tapankov
                Aug 19 '10 at 5:47






              • 1





                What I found useful in winshell is that it is portable and has unicode support.

                – fabikw
                Nov 12 '10 at 16:46














              21












              21








              21







              WinShell



              Available For: Windows

              FreeWare






              WinShell is a free multilingual integrated development environment (IDE) for LaTeX and TeX. The program includes a text editor, syntax highlighting, project management, spell checking, a table wizard, BibTeX support, Unicode support, different toolbars and user configuration options. It is not a LaTeX system; an additional LaTeX package is required.




              WinShell screenshot
              Click image to enlarge






              share|improve this answer















              WinShell



              Available For: Windows

              FreeWare






              WinShell is a free multilingual integrated development environment (IDE) for LaTeX and TeX. The program includes a text editor, syntax highlighting, project management, spell checking, a table wizard, BibTeX support, Unicode support, different toolbars and user configuration options. It is not a LaTeX system; an additional LaTeX package is required.




              WinShell screenshot
              Click image to enlarge







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Apr 22 '12 at 21:46


























              community wiki





              5 revs, 4 users 61%
              alexandrul










              • 2





                Finally, someone mentioned it. I've tried almost all IDEs mentioned thus far, and only WinShell managed to stick, and is now my editor of choice. There are a few handy options that I miss, though (namely, including a fancy symbol from a menu if you've forgotten the name -- the way TexnicCenter does).

                – Martin Tapankov
                Aug 19 '10 at 5:47






              • 1





                What I found useful in winshell is that it is portable and has unicode support.

                – fabikw
                Nov 12 '10 at 16:46














              • 2





                Finally, someone mentioned it. I've tried almost all IDEs mentioned thus far, and only WinShell managed to stick, and is now my editor of choice. There are a few handy options that I miss, though (namely, including a fancy symbol from a menu if you've forgotten the name -- the way TexnicCenter does).

                – Martin Tapankov
                Aug 19 '10 at 5:47






              • 1





                What I found useful in winshell is that it is portable and has unicode support.

                – fabikw
                Nov 12 '10 at 16:46








              2




              2





              Finally, someone mentioned it. I've tried almost all IDEs mentioned thus far, and only WinShell managed to stick, and is now my editor of choice. There are a few handy options that I miss, though (namely, including a fancy symbol from a menu if you've forgotten the name -- the way TexnicCenter does).

              – Martin Tapankov
              Aug 19 '10 at 5:47





              Finally, someone mentioned it. I've tried almost all IDEs mentioned thus far, and only WinShell managed to stick, and is now my editor of choice. There are a few handy options that I miss, though (namely, including a fancy symbol from a menu if you've forgotten the name -- the way TexnicCenter does).

              – Martin Tapankov
              Aug 19 '10 at 5:47




              1




              1





              What I found useful in winshell is that it is portable and has unicode support.

              – fabikw
              Nov 12 '10 at 16:46





              What I found useful in winshell is that it is portable and has unicode support.

              – fabikw
              Nov 12 '10 at 16:46











              19















              BaKoMa TeX Word — bakoma





              • platforms: Windows, OS X, Linux


              • License: commercial -- €55 or $101 per licence (other quantity discounts)


              • Languages: English


              • Unicode: Yes


              • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


              • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


              • Code Folding: No


              • Spell Checking: Yes


              • SyncTeX: ?


              • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes. Can view output in real time, and directly edit output file


              • Project Management: Yes




              I think BaKoMa is an innovative useful WYSIWYG editor. It allows users to edit both in the .tex file and in the output file. The real-time preview feature can come in handy when creating graphics and figures (e.g. using PSTricks or TikZ). In a review of BaKoMa, Martin Osborne made the following comment:




              If you find the output of int_0^infty hard to visualize, you'll definitely have trouble with the output of



              psline(25,25)(25,0)
              psline(0,0)(50,0)
              psset{origin={25,0},unit=25mm}
              psplot{-1}{1}{x dup mul}


              [BaKoMa] TeX Word makes it easy: you type the code and the output appears
              instantly. For me, TeX Word has cut the production time for figures by
              at least 75%.




              bakoma screenshot






              share|improve this answer


























              • @AlanH: I did include a link to their licensing page. Should I make it more explicit?

                – Herr K.
                May 5 '13 at 20:55






              • 1





                @Kevin Yeah, it might be nice to list how much it costs. It's quite substantial.

                – AlanH
                May 5 '13 at 20:57






              • 4





                There are three things I don't understand about BaKoMa. 1. Why isn't it more widely used? You edit the TeX code and instantly see the output, or just edit the output---saving a huge amount of time. How is it possible to create slides, for example, any other way? 2. Why isn't there an open source project to develop a similar system? 3. How can anyone complain about paying the price of dinner for two for a system that is so superior to the competition? The 200-odd people who think Emacs is a better system must be living in a different world than I am!

                – Martin J. Osborne
                Dec 31 '14 at 0:33








              • 2





                @Martin: I agree wholeheartedly. I guess people don't realize the value of incremental instantaneous live preview until they use it. And lots of people don't need to LaTeX figures.

                – Jamie Vicary
                May 7 '15 at 16:18











              • I've been devotedly using BaKoMa since 2007 and it amazes me that none of the other options appear to have even caught up to the version from 2007. I am about to upgrade to the 2015 version (university insists on having their own active license--won't complain too much) and it's nice to see many of the old quirks have been fixed. I agree the cost shouldn't be an issue for serious researchers: this is orders of magnitude better than the alternatives. It's just hard to get people to pay for something when a free option exists, even if they are so far behind.

                – Jack Huizenga
                Aug 25 '15 at 22:33
















              19















              BaKoMa TeX Word — bakoma





              • platforms: Windows, OS X, Linux


              • License: commercial -- €55 or $101 per licence (other quantity discounts)


              • Languages: English


              • Unicode: Yes


              • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


              • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


              • Code Folding: No


              • Spell Checking: Yes


              • SyncTeX: ?


              • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes. Can view output in real time, and directly edit output file


              • Project Management: Yes




              I think BaKoMa is an innovative useful WYSIWYG editor. It allows users to edit both in the .tex file and in the output file. The real-time preview feature can come in handy when creating graphics and figures (e.g. using PSTricks or TikZ). In a review of BaKoMa, Martin Osborne made the following comment:




              If you find the output of int_0^infty hard to visualize, you'll definitely have trouble with the output of



              psline(25,25)(25,0)
              psline(0,0)(50,0)
              psset{origin={25,0},unit=25mm}
              psplot{-1}{1}{x dup mul}


              [BaKoMa] TeX Word makes it easy: you type the code and the output appears
              instantly. For me, TeX Word has cut the production time for figures by
              at least 75%.




              bakoma screenshot






              share|improve this answer


























              • @AlanH: I did include a link to their licensing page. Should I make it more explicit?

                – Herr K.
                May 5 '13 at 20:55






              • 1





                @Kevin Yeah, it might be nice to list how much it costs. It's quite substantial.

                – AlanH
                May 5 '13 at 20:57






              • 4





                There are three things I don't understand about BaKoMa. 1. Why isn't it more widely used? You edit the TeX code and instantly see the output, or just edit the output---saving a huge amount of time. How is it possible to create slides, for example, any other way? 2. Why isn't there an open source project to develop a similar system? 3. How can anyone complain about paying the price of dinner for two for a system that is so superior to the competition? The 200-odd people who think Emacs is a better system must be living in a different world than I am!

                – Martin J. Osborne
                Dec 31 '14 at 0:33








              • 2





                @Martin: I agree wholeheartedly. I guess people don't realize the value of incremental instantaneous live preview until they use it. And lots of people don't need to LaTeX figures.

                – Jamie Vicary
                May 7 '15 at 16:18











              • I've been devotedly using BaKoMa since 2007 and it amazes me that none of the other options appear to have even caught up to the version from 2007. I am about to upgrade to the 2015 version (university insists on having their own active license--won't complain too much) and it's nice to see many of the old quirks have been fixed. I agree the cost shouldn't be an issue for serious researchers: this is orders of magnitude better than the alternatives. It's just hard to get people to pay for something when a free option exists, even if they are so far behind.

                – Jack Huizenga
                Aug 25 '15 at 22:33














              19












              19








              19








              BaKoMa TeX Word — bakoma





              • platforms: Windows, OS X, Linux


              • License: commercial -- €55 or $101 per licence (other quantity discounts)


              • Languages: English


              • Unicode: Yes


              • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


              • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


              • Code Folding: No


              • Spell Checking: Yes


              • SyncTeX: ?


              • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes. Can view output in real time, and directly edit output file


              • Project Management: Yes




              I think BaKoMa is an innovative useful WYSIWYG editor. It allows users to edit both in the .tex file and in the output file. The real-time preview feature can come in handy when creating graphics and figures (e.g. using PSTricks or TikZ). In a review of BaKoMa, Martin Osborne made the following comment:




              If you find the output of int_0^infty hard to visualize, you'll definitely have trouble with the output of



              psline(25,25)(25,0)
              psline(0,0)(50,0)
              psset{origin={25,0},unit=25mm}
              psplot{-1}{1}{x dup mul}


              [BaKoMa] TeX Word makes it easy: you type the code and the output appears
              instantly. For me, TeX Word has cut the production time for figures by
              at least 75%.




              bakoma screenshot






              share|improve this answer
















              BaKoMa TeX Word — bakoma





              • platforms: Windows, OS X, Linux


              • License: commercial -- €55 or $101 per licence (other quantity discounts)


              • Languages: English


              • Unicode: Yes


              • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable


              • Code Completion: Yes, customizable


              • Code Folding: No


              • Spell Checking: Yes


              • SyncTeX: ?


              • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes. Can view output in real time, and directly edit output file


              • Project Management: Yes




              I think BaKoMa is an innovative useful WYSIWYG editor. It allows users to edit both in the .tex file and in the output file. The real-time preview feature can come in handy when creating graphics and figures (e.g. using PSTricks or TikZ). In a review of BaKoMa, Martin Osborne made the following comment:




              If you find the output of int_0^infty hard to visualize, you'll definitely have trouble with the output of



              psline(25,25)(25,0)
              psline(0,0)(50,0)
              psset{origin={25,0},unit=25mm}
              psplot{-1}{1}{x dup mul}


              [BaKoMa] TeX Word makes it easy: you type the code and the output appears
              instantly. For me, TeX Word has cut the production time for figures by
              at least 75%.




              bakoma screenshot







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Jul 18 '17 at 23:47


























              community wiki





              5 revs, 4 users 58%
              Herr K.














              • @AlanH: I did include a link to their licensing page. Should I make it more explicit?

                – Herr K.
                May 5 '13 at 20:55






              • 1





                @Kevin Yeah, it might be nice to list how much it costs. It's quite substantial.

                – AlanH
                May 5 '13 at 20:57






              • 4





                There are three things I don't understand about BaKoMa. 1. Why isn't it more widely used? You edit the TeX code and instantly see the output, or just edit the output---saving a huge amount of time. How is it possible to create slides, for example, any other way? 2. Why isn't there an open source project to develop a similar system? 3. How can anyone complain about paying the price of dinner for two for a system that is so superior to the competition? The 200-odd people who think Emacs is a better system must be living in a different world than I am!

                – Martin J. Osborne
                Dec 31 '14 at 0:33








              • 2





                @Martin: I agree wholeheartedly. I guess people don't realize the value of incremental instantaneous live preview until they use it. And lots of people don't need to LaTeX figures.

                – Jamie Vicary
                May 7 '15 at 16:18











              • I've been devotedly using BaKoMa since 2007 and it amazes me that none of the other options appear to have even caught up to the version from 2007. I am about to upgrade to the 2015 version (university insists on having their own active license--won't complain too much) and it's nice to see many of the old quirks have been fixed. I agree the cost shouldn't be an issue for serious researchers: this is orders of magnitude better than the alternatives. It's just hard to get people to pay for something when a free option exists, even if they are so far behind.

                – Jack Huizenga
                Aug 25 '15 at 22:33



















              • @AlanH: I did include a link to their licensing page. Should I make it more explicit?

                – Herr K.
                May 5 '13 at 20:55






              • 1





                @Kevin Yeah, it might be nice to list how much it costs. It's quite substantial.

                – AlanH
                May 5 '13 at 20:57






              • 4





                There are three things I don't understand about BaKoMa. 1. Why isn't it more widely used? You edit the TeX code and instantly see the output, or just edit the output---saving a huge amount of time. How is it possible to create slides, for example, any other way? 2. Why isn't there an open source project to develop a similar system? 3. How can anyone complain about paying the price of dinner for two for a system that is so superior to the competition? The 200-odd people who think Emacs is a better system must be living in a different world than I am!

                – Martin J. Osborne
                Dec 31 '14 at 0:33








              • 2





                @Martin: I agree wholeheartedly. I guess people don't realize the value of incremental instantaneous live preview until they use it. And lots of people don't need to LaTeX figures.

                – Jamie Vicary
                May 7 '15 at 16:18











              • I've been devotedly using BaKoMa since 2007 and it amazes me that none of the other options appear to have even caught up to the version from 2007. I am about to upgrade to the 2015 version (university insists on having their own active license--won't complain too much) and it's nice to see many of the old quirks have been fixed. I agree the cost shouldn't be an issue for serious researchers: this is orders of magnitude better than the alternatives. It's just hard to get people to pay for something when a free option exists, even if they are so far behind.

                – Jack Huizenga
                Aug 25 '15 at 22:33

















              @AlanH: I did include a link to their licensing page. Should I make it more explicit?

              – Herr K.
              May 5 '13 at 20:55





              @AlanH: I did include a link to their licensing page. Should I make it more explicit?

              – Herr K.
              May 5 '13 at 20:55




              1




              1





              @Kevin Yeah, it might be nice to list how much it costs. It's quite substantial.

              – AlanH
              May 5 '13 at 20:57





              @Kevin Yeah, it might be nice to list how much it costs. It's quite substantial.

              – AlanH
              May 5 '13 at 20:57




              4




              4





              There are three things I don't understand about BaKoMa. 1. Why isn't it more widely used? You edit the TeX code and instantly see the output, or just edit the output---saving a huge amount of time. How is it possible to create slides, for example, any other way? 2. Why isn't there an open source project to develop a similar system? 3. How can anyone complain about paying the price of dinner for two for a system that is so superior to the competition? The 200-odd people who think Emacs is a better system must be living in a different world than I am!

              – Martin J. Osborne
              Dec 31 '14 at 0:33







              There are three things I don't understand about BaKoMa. 1. Why isn't it more widely used? You edit the TeX code and instantly see the output, or just edit the output---saving a huge amount of time. How is it possible to create slides, for example, any other way? 2. Why isn't there an open source project to develop a similar system? 3. How can anyone complain about paying the price of dinner for two for a system that is so superior to the competition? The 200-odd people who think Emacs is a better system must be living in a different world than I am!

              – Martin J. Osborne
              Dec 31 '14 at 0:33






              2




              2





              @Martin: I agree wholeheartedly. I guess people don't realize the value of incremental instantaneous live preview until they use it. And lots of people don't need to LaTeX figures.

              – Jamie Vicary
              May 7 '15 at 16:18





              @Martin: I agree wholeheartedly. I guess people don't realize the value of incremental instantaneous live preview until they use it. And lots of people don't need to LaTeX figures.

              – Jamie Vicary
              May 7 '15 at 16:18













              I've been devotedly using BaKoMa since 2007 and it amazes me that none of the other options appear to have even caught up to the version from 2007. I am about to upgrade to the 2015 version (university insists on having their own active license--won't complain too much) and it's nice to see many of the old quirks have been fixed. I agree the cost shouldn't be an issue for serious researchers: this is orders of magnitude better than the alternatives. It's just hard to get people to pay for something when a free option exists, even if they are so far behind.

              – Jack Huizenga
              Aug 25 '15 at 22:33





              I've been devotedly using BaKoMa since 2007 and it amazes me that none of the other options appear to have even caught up to the version from 2007. I am about to upgrade to the 2015 version (university insists on having their own active license--won't complain too much) and it's nice to see many of the old quirks have been fixed. I agree the cost shouldn't be an issue for serious researchers: this is orders of magnitude better than the alternatives. It's just hard to get people to pay for something when a free option exists, even if they are so far behind.

              – Jack Huizenga
              Aug 25 '15 at 22:33











              18















              Overleaf - Online LaTeX editor in your web browser.



              Note: The companies behind ShareLaTeX and Overleaf have merged, and as such the two services will at some point in the future be merged into one. See https://www.overleaf.com/blog/518-exciting-news-sharelatex-is-joining-overleaf#.Wa_pdL8hWV4.




              • Unlimited projects and collaborators for free

              • Rich Text View

              • git support

              • pdflatex compiler

              • Collaborate with others, see what they are typing in real time like Google documents

              • Auto Complete

              • Multi Language spell check

              • Export and import data

              • Sync with Dropbox

              • Regular snapshots allowing for rolling back

              • formally known as WriteLaTeX


              screenshot






              share|improve this answer


























              • What is the privacy of the documents, in free mode?

                – becko
                Apr 5 '16 at 17:38











              • Overleaf has the shortcoming that it doesn't use an up-to-date TeX distribution, but it has many templates and customer assistance is very good.

                – CarLaTeX
                Feb 18 '17 at 5:25











              • I wish they allowed working against Git repository (For instance, let's say I have GitHub repository and I want it to be the editor).

                – Royi
                Jun 8 '17 at 19:48
















              18















              Overleaf - Online LaTeX editor in your web browser.



              Note: The companies behind ShareLaTeX and Overleaf have merged, and as such the two services will at some point in the future be merged into one. See https://www.overleaf.com/blog/518-exciting-news-sharelatex-is-joining-overleaf#.Wa_pdL8hWV4.




              • Unlimited projects and collaborators for free

              • Rich Text View

              • git support

              • pdflatex compiler

              • Collaborate with others, see what they are typing in real time like Google documents

              • Auto Complete

              • Multi Language spell check

              • Export and import data

              • Sync with Dropbox

              • Regular snapshots allowing for rolling back

              • formally known as WriteLaTeX


              screenshot






              share|improve this answer


























              • What is the privacy of the documents, in free mode?

                – becko
                Apr 5 '16 at 17:38











              • Overleaf has the shortcoming that it doesn't use an up-to-date TeX distribution, but it has many templates and customer assistance is very good.

                – CarLaTeX
                Feb 18 '17 at 5:25











              • I wish they allowed working against Git repository (For instance, let's say I have GitHub repository and I want it to be the editor).

                – Royi
                Jun 8 '17 at 19:48














              18












              18








              18








              Overleaf - Online LaTeX editor in your web browser.



              Note: The companies behind ShareLaTeX and Overleaf have merged, and as such the two services will at some point in the future be merged into one. See https://www.overleaf.com/blog/518-exciting-news-sharelatex-is-joining-overleaf#.Wa_pdL8hWV4.




              • Unlimited projects and collaborators for free

              • Rich Text View

              • git support

              • pdflatex compiler

              • Collaborate with others, see what they are typing in real time like Google documents

              • Auto Complete

              • Multi Language spell check

              • Export and import data

              • Sync with Dropbox

              • Regular snapshots allowing for rolling back

              • formally known as WriteLaTeX


              screenshot






              share|improve this answer
















              Overleaf - Online LaTeX editor in your web browser.



              Note: The companies behind ShareLaTeX and Overleaf have merged, and as such the two services will at some point in the future be merged into one. See https://www.overleaf.com/blog/518-exciting-news-sharelatex-is-joining-overleaf#.Wa_pdL8hWV4.




              • Unlimited projects and collaborators for free

              • Rich Text View

              • git support

              • pdflatex compiler

              • Collaborate with others, see what they are typing in real time like Google documents

              • Auto Complete

              • Multi Language spell check

              • Export and import data

              • Sync with Dropbox

              • Regular snapshots allowing for rolling back

              • formally known as WriteLaTeX


              screenshot







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Sep 6 '17 at 12:27


























              community wiki





              2 revs, 2 users 93%
              koppor














              • What is the privacy of the documents, in free mode?

                – becko
                Apr 5 '16 at 17:38











              • Overleaf has the shortcoming that it doesn't use an up-to-date TeX distribution, but it has many templates and customer assistance is very good.

                – CarLaTeX
                Feb 18 '17 at 5:25











              • I wish they allowed working against Git repository (For instance, let's say I have GitHub repository and I want it to be the editor).

                – Royi
                Jun 8 '17 at 19:48



















              • What is the privacy of the documents, in free mode?

                – becko
                Apr 5 '16 at 17:38











              • Overleaf has the shortcoming that it doesn't use an up-to-date TeX distribution, but it has many templates and customer assistance is very good.

                – CarLaTeX
                Feb 18 '17 at 5:25











              • I wish they allowed working against Git repository (For instance, let's say I have GitHub repository and I want it to be the editor).

                – Royi
                Jun 8 '17 at 19:48

















              What is the privacy of the documents, in free mode?

              – becko
              Apr 5 '16 at 17:38





              What is the privacy of the documents, in free mode?

              – becko
              Apr 5 '16 at 17:38













              Overleaf has the shortcoming that it doesn't use an up-to-date TeX distribution, but it has many templates and customer assistance is very good.

              – CarLaTeX
              Feb 18 '17 at 5:25





              Overleaf has the shortcoming that it doesn't use an up-to-date TeX distribution, but it has many templates and customer assistance is very good.

              – CarLaTeX
              Feb 18 '17 at 5:25













              I wish they allowed working against Git repository (For instance, let's say I have GitHub repository and I want it to be the editor).

              – Royi
              Jun 8 '17 at 19:48





              I wish they allowed working against Git repository (For instance, let's say I have GitHub repository and I want it to be the editor).

              – Royi
              Jun 8 '17 at 19:48











              18















              Visual Studio Code with LaTeX-Workshop (on GitHub)



              other extensions are available





              • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Linux


              • License: open source (on GitHub), License MIT


              • Languages: de, en, fr, ...


              • Unicode: Yes


              • RTL/bidi: ...


              • % !TEX directives: Yes


              • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable (extensions)


              • Code Completion: Yes, customizable (extensions)


              • Code Folding: Yes


              • Spell Checking: Yes


              • SyncTeX: Yes


              • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes


              • Project Management: Yes


              • Autosave: Yes


              • Line Spacing: Yes


              vscode with LaTeX-Workshopnote: picture from LaTeX-Workshop description (link: animated gif)





              note: "I am not actively using this editor, but wanted to list it here. I was unsure about some points - please fill the gaps if you know whether these features are supported."






              share|improve this answer






























                18















                Visual Studio Code with LaTeX-Workshop (on GitHub)



                other extensions are available





                • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Linux


                • License: open source (on GitHub), License MIT


                • Languages: de, en, fr, ...


                • Unicode: Yes


                • RTL/bidi: ...


                • % !TEX directives: Yes


                • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable (extensions)


                • Code Completion: Yes, customizable (extensions)


                • Code Folding: Yes


                • Spell Checking: Yes


                • SyncTeX: Yes


                • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes


                • Project Management: Yes


                • Autosave: Yes


                • Line Spacing: Yes


                vscode with LaTeX-Workshopnote: picture from LaTeX-Workshop description (link: animated gif)





                note: "I am not actively using this editor, but wanted to list it here. I was unsure about some points - please fill the gaps if you know whether these features are supported."






                share|improve this answer




























                  18












                  18








                  18








                  Visual Studio Code with LaTeX-Workshop (on GitHub)



                  other extensions are available





                  • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Linux


                  • License: open source (on GitHub), License MIT


                  • Languages: de, en, fr, ...


                  • Unicode: Yes


                  • RTL/bidi: ...


                  • % !TEX directives: Yes


                  • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable (extensions)


                  • Code Completion: Yes, customizable (extensions)


                  • Code Folding: Yes


                  • Spell Checking: Yes


                  • SyncTeX: Yes


                  • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes


                  • Project Management: Yes


                  • Autosave: Yes


                  • Line Spacing: Yes


                  vscode with LaTeX-Workshopnote: picture from LaTeX-Workshop description (link: animated gif)





                  note: "I am not actively using this editor, but wanted to list it here. I was unsure about some points - please fill the gaps if you know whether these features are supported."






                  share|improve this answer
















                  Visual Studio Code with LaTeX-Workshop (on GitHub)



                  other extensions are available





                  • Platforms: Windows, Mac, Linux


                  • License: open source (on GitHub), License MIT


                  • Languages: de, en, fr, ...


                  • Unicode: Yes


                  • RTL/bidi: ...


                  • % !TEX directives: Yes


                  • Syntax Highlighting: Yes, customizable (extensions)


                  • Code Completion: Yes, customizable (extensions)


                  • Code Folding: Yes


                  • Spell Checking: Yes


                  • SyncTeX: Yes


                  • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes


                  • Project Management: Yes


                  • Autosave: Yes


                  • Line Spacing: Yes


                  vscode with LaTeX-Workshopnote: picture from LaTeX-Workshop description (link: animated gif)





                  note: "I am not actively using this editor, but wanted to list it here. I was unsure about some points - please fill the gaps if you know whether these features are supported."







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Sep 16 '17 at 11:38


























                  community wiki





                  3 revs, 2 users 97%
                  gr4nt3d
























                      16














                      Inlage



                      Available for: Windows

                      Commercial





                      Inlage is a great LaTeX IDE for Windows Vista/7. It has a lot of features that make it easy to handle LaTeX. The autocompletion has many commands with icons and descriptions and if you have a tablet pc you can use the Math Input Panel to translate a symbol or an equation to LaTeX.



                      Main features:




                      • Math Input Panel to LaTeX

                      • Excel/Calc tables to LaTeX

                      • autocompletion

                      • spell checker

                      • docking system

                      • inverse/forward search (SumatraPDF)

                      • code folding



                      Click image to enlarge






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • Inlage looks great. It is commercial, but might be worth the money.

                        – ipavlic
                        Apr 30 '11 at 17:45






                      • 1





                        I found a inlage a few months ago via this thread and I'm very happy with it. I used it for several papers and now i'm writing my thesis with it.

                        – kventil
                        Aug 24 '11 at 10:22






                      • 2





                        unstable ... inlage 5 ... Personal opinion ... User since an year ... Had to switch to editor ...

                        – abhilash sukumari
                        May 7 '13 at 1:34






                      • 1





                        Inlage 4 is more stable than the newer one. Inlage 4 is for free now, Please download and try it ...

                        – abhilash sukumari
                        Nov 29 '13 at 8:34











                      • It appears that Inlage 4 only works with MikTeX, and not with TeXLive, so it is not usable for me. Otherwise it would have looked quite nice.

                        – hbaderts
                        Aug 17 '15 at 6:51
















                      16














                      Inlage



                      Available for: Windows

                      Commercial





                      Inlage is a great LaTeX IDE for Windows Vista/7. It has a lot of features that make it easy to handle LaTeX. The autocompletion has many commands with icons and descriptions and if you have a tablet pc you can use the Math Input Panel to translate a symbol or an equation to LaTeX.



                      Main features:




                      • Math Input Panel to LaTeX

                      • Excel/Calc tables to LaTeX

                      • autocompletion

                      • spell checker

                      • docking system

                      • inverse/forward search (SumatraPDF)

                      • code folding



                      Click image to enlarge






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • Inlage looks great. It is commercial, but might be worth the money.

                        – ipavlic
                        Apr 30 '11 at 17:45






                      • 1





                        I found a inlage a few months ago via this thread and I'm very happy with it. I used it for several papers and now i'm writing my thesis with it.

                        – kventil
                        Aug 24 '11 at 10:22






                      • 2





                        unstable ... inlage 5 ... Personal opinion ... User since an year ... Had to switch to editor ...

                        – abhilash sukumari
                        May 7 '13 at 1:34






                      • 1





                        Inlage 4 is more stable than the newer one. Inlage 4 is for free now, Please download and try it ...

                        – abhilash sukumari
                        Nov 29 '13 at 8:34











                      • It appears that Inlage 4 only works with MikTeX, and not with TeXLive, so it is not usable for me. Otherwise it would have looked quite nice.

                        – hbaderts
                        Aug 17 '15 at 6:51














                      16












                      16








                      16







                      Inlage



                      Available for: Windows

                      Commercial





                      Inlage is a great LaTeX IDE for Windows Vista/7. It has a lot of features that make it easy to handle LaTeX. The autocompletion has many commands with icons and descriptions and if you have a tablet pc you can use the Math Input Panel to translate a symbol or an equation to LaTeX.



                      Main features:




                      • Math Input Panel to LaTeX

                      • Excel/Calc tables to LaTeX

                      • autocompletion

                      • spell checker

                      • docking system

                      • inverse/forward search (SumatraPDF)

                      • code folding



                      Click image to enlarge






                      share|improve this answer















                      Inlage



                      Available for: Windows

                      Commercial





                      Inlage is a great LaTeX IDE for Windows Vista/7. It has a lot of features that make it easy to handle LaTeX. The autocompletion has many commands with icons and descriptions and if you have a tablet pc you can use the Math Input Panel to translate a symbol or an equation to LaTeX.



                      Main features:




                      • Math Input Panel to LaTeX

                      • Excel/Calc tables to LaTeX

                      • autocompletion

                      • spell checker

                      • docking system

                      • inverse/forward search (SumatraPDF)

                      • code folding



                      Click image to enlarge







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Jan 30 '17 at 22:30


























                      community wiki





                      5 revs, 4 users 77%
                      zee














                      • Inlage looks great. It is commercial, but might be worth the money.

                        – ipavlic
                        Apr 30 '11 at 17:45






                      • 1





                        I found a inlage a few months ago via this thread and I'm very happy with it. I used it for several papers and now i'm writing my thesis with it.

                        – kventil
                        Aug 24 '11 at 10:22






                      • 2





                        unstable ... inlage 5 ... Personal opinion ... User since an year ... Had to switch to editor ...

                        – abhilash sukumari
                        May 7 '13 at 1:34






                      • 1





                        Inlage 4 is more stable than the newer one. Inlage 4 is for free now, Please download and try it ...

                        – abhilash sukumari
                        Nov 29 '13 at 8:34











                      • It appears that Inlage 4 only works with MikTeX, and not with TeXLive, so it is not usable for me. Otherwise it would have looked quite nice.

                        – hbaderts
                        Aug 17 '15 at 6:51



















                      • Inlage looks great. It is commercial, but might be worth the money.

                        – ipavlic
                        Apr 30 '11 at 17:45






                      • 1





                        I found a inlage a few months ago via this thread and I'm very happy with it. I used it for several papers and now i'm writing my thesis with it.

                        – kventil
                        Aug 24 '11 at 10:22






                      • 2





                        unstable ... inlage 5 ... Personal opinion ... User since an year ... Had to switch to editor ...

                        – abhilash sukumari
                        May 7 '13 at 1:34






                      • 1





                        Inlage 4 is more stable than the newer one. Inlage 4 is for free now, Please download and try it ...

                        – abhilash sukumari
                        Nov 29 '13 at 8:34











                      • It appears that Inlage 4 only works with MikTeX, and not with TeXLive, so it is not usable for me. Otherwise it would have looked quite nice.

                        – hbaderts
                        Aug 17 '15 at 6:51

















                      Inlage looks great. It is commercial, but might be worth the money.

                      – ipavlic
                      Apr 30 '11 at 17:45





                      Inlage looks great. It is commercial, but might be worth the money.

                      – ipavlic
                      Apr 30 '11 at 17:45




                      1




                      1





                      I found a inlage a few months ago via this thread and I'm very happy with it. I used it for several papers and now i'm writing my thesis with it.

                      – kventil
                      Aug 24 '11 at 10:22





                      I found a inlage a few months ago via this thread and I'm very happy with it. I used it for several papers and now i'm writing my thesis with it.

                      – kventil
                      Aug 24 '11 at 10:22




                      2




                      2





                      unstable ... inlage 5 ... Personal opinion ... User since an year ... Had to switch to editor ...

                      – abhilash sukumari
                      May 7 '13 at 1:34





                      unstable ... inlage 5 ... Personal opinion ... User since an year ... Had to switch to editor ...

                      – abhilash sukumari
                      May 7 '13 at 1:34




                      1




                      1





                      Inlage 4 is more stable than the newer one. Inlage 4 is for free now, Please download and try it ...

                      – abhilash sukumari
                      Nov 29 '13 at 8:34





                      Inlage 4 is more stable than the newer one. Inlage 4 is for free now, Please download and try it ...

                      – abhilash sukumari
                      Nov 29 '13 at 8:34













                      It appears that Inlage 4 only works with MikTeX, and not with TeXLive, so it is not usable for me. Otherwise it would have looked quite nice.

                      – hbaderts
                      Aug 17 '15 at 6:51





                      It appears that Inlage 4 only works with MikTeX, and not with TeXLive, so it is not usable for me. Otherwise it would have looked quite nice.

                      – hbaderts
                      Aug 17 '15 at 6:51











                      15














                      TeXnicle





                      • Platforms: Mac


                      • License: Free


                      • Languages: English


                      • Unicode: Yes


                      • RTL/bidi: No


                      • % !TEX directives: No


                      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes (configurable)


                      • Code Completion: Yes


                      • Code Folding: Yes


                      • Spell Checking: Yes


                      • SyncTeX: Yes


                      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes


                      • Project Management: Yes




                      enter image description here






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • How do you solve the lack of support for Biber, if you do? I need some of its features, mainly Unicode.

                        – Harold Cavendish
                        Jan 3 '14 at 21:47











                      • @HaroldCavendish: I don't have a Mac... consider asking in chat.

                        – Werner
                        Jan 3 '14 at 21:56











                      • Thanks, it was worth it. Should anyone look for the same, all it takes is to go to Preferences –> Typesetting –> Engines, make a duplicate of the desired one (e.g. pdfLaTeX) and redefine the variable BIBTEX by replacing the path to BibTeX with the one pointing to Biber. Thanks to Joseph Wright's suggestion.

                        – Harold Cavendish
                        Jan 3 '14 at 22:37


















                      15














                      TeXnicle





                      • Platforms: Mac


                      • License: Free


                      • Languages: English


                      • Unicode: Yes


                      • RTL/bidi: No


                      • % !TEX directives: No


                      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes (configurable)


                      • Code Completion: Yes


                      • Code Folding: Yes


                      • Spell Checking: Yes


                      • SyncTeX: Yes


                      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes


                      • Project Management: Yes




                      enter image description here






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • How do you solve the lack of support for Biber, if you do? I need some of its features, mainly Unicode.

                        – Harold Cavendish
                        Jan 3 '14 at 21:47











                      • @HaroldCavendish: I don't have a Mac... consider asking in chat.

                        – Werner
                        Jan 3 '14 at 21:56











                      • Thanks, it was worth it. Should anyone look for the same, all it takes is to go to Preferences –> Typesetting –> Engines, make a duplicate of the desired one (e.g. pdfLaTeX) and redefine the variable BIBTEX by replacing the path to BibTeX with the one pointing to Biber. Thanks to Joseph Wright's suggestion.

                        – Harold Cavendish
                        Jan 3 '14 at 22:37
















                      15












                      15








                      15







                      TeXnicle





                      • Platforms: Mac


                      • License: Free


                      • Languages: English


                      • Unicode: Yes


                      • RTL/bidi: No


                      • % !TEX directives: No


                      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes (configurable)


                      • Code Completion: Yes


                      • Code Folding: Yes


                      • Spell Checking: Yes


                      • SyncTeX: Yes


                      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes


                      • Project Management: Yes




                      enter image description here






                      share|improve this answer















                      TeXnicle





                      • Platforms: Mac


                      • License: Free


                      • Languages: English


                      • Unicode: Yes


                      • RTL/bidi: No


                      • % !TEX directives: No


                      • Syntax Highlighting: Yes (configurable)


                      • Code Completion: Yes


                      • Code Folding: Yes


                      • Spell Checking: Yes


                      • SyncTeX: Yes


                      • Built-in Output Viewer: Yes


                      • Project Management: Yes




                      enter image description here







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Nov 2 '13 at 17:12


























                      community wiki





                      3 revs, 2 users 88%
                      Werner















                      • How do you solve the lack of support for Biber, if you do? I need some of its features, mainly Unicode.

                        – Harold Cavendish
                        Jan 3 '14 at 21:47











                      • @HaroldCavendish: I don't have a Mac... consider asking in chat.

                        – Werner
                        Jan 3 '14 at 21:56











                      • Thanks, it was worth it. Should anyone look for the same, all it takes is to go to Preferences –> Typesetting –> Engines, make a duplicate of the desired one (e.g. pdfLaTeX) and redefine the variable BIBTEX by replacing the path to BibTeX with the one pointing to Biber. Thanks to Joseph Wright's suggestion.

                        – Harold Cavendish
                        Jan 3 '14 at 22:37





















                      • How do you solve the lack of support for Biber, if you do? I need some of its features, mainly Unicode.

                        – Harold Cavendish
                        Jan 3 '14 at 21:47











                      • @HaroldCavendish: I don't have a Mac... consider asking in chat.

                        – Werner
                        Jan 3 '14 at 21:56











                      • Thanks, it was worth it. Should anyone look for the same, all it takes is to go to Preferences –> Typesetting –> Engines, make a duplicate of the desired one (e.g. pdfLaTeX) and redefine the variable BIBTEX by replacing the path to BibTeX with the one pointing to Biber. Thanks to Joseph Wright's suggestion.

                        – Harold Cavendish
                        Jan 3 '14 at 22:37



















                      How do you solve the lack of support for Biber, if you do? I need some of its features, mainly Unicode.

                      – Harold Cavendish
                      Jan 3 '14 at 21:47





                      How do you solve the lack of support for Biber, if you do? I need some of its features, mainly Unicode.

                      – Harold Cavendish
                      Jan 3 '14 at 21:47













                      @HaroldCavendish: I don't have a Mac... consider asking in chat.

                      – Werner
                      Jan 3 '14 at 21:56





                      @HaroldCavendish: I don't have a Mac... consider asking in chat.

                      – Werner
                      Jan 3 '14 at 21:56













                      Thanks, it was worth it. Should anyone look for the same, all it takes is to go to Preferences –> Typesetting –> Engines, make a duplicate of the desired one (e.g. pdfLaTeX) and redefine the variable BIBTEX by replacing the path to BibTeX with the one pointing to Biber. Thanks to Joseph Wright's suggestion.

                      – Harold Cavendish
                      Jan 3 '14 at 22:37







                      Thanks, it was worth it. Should anyone look for the same, all it takes is to go to Preferences –> Typesetting –> Engines, make a duplicate of the desired one (e.g. pdfLaTeX) and redefine the variable BIBTEX by replacing the path to BibTeX with the one pointing to Biber. Thanks to Joseph Wright's suggestion.

                      – Harold Cavendish
                      Jan 3 '14 at 22:37












                      1 2
                      next




                      protected by Kurt Jun 1 '16 at 1:04



                      Thank you for your interest in this question.
                      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      円仁

                      平林たい子

                      ティム・エリオット