Will the US military receive a 10% pay raise in 2019?
Supposedly, Trump told soldiers in Iraq that (1) he just got them a 10% pay raise, and (2) supposedly also told them that this is the first raise they have received in a decade.
Fact check: Trump brags to troops about 10 percent pay raise he didn't actually give them
Trump misleads about military pay raises again
And a here is a politifact page about this, also claiming it to be a complete lie.
Both facts are being called false by the media. It is being reported that the raise is actually 2.6%, which is not only not 10%, but is not even the largest raise they have received in the decade he mentioned.
Is the military receiving a 10% pay raise?
If not true, and if not a complete fabrication, where does the 10% figure come from?
CNN and NBC have already provided government citation on the "only pay raise in a decade" part, pointing to the pay raises for each year here, and because of that I am asking only about the 10% raise figure, not about the "no raises in a decade" statement.
The basic pay raises since 2007:
1 January 2007: 2.2%
1 April 2007: 0.5%
1 January 2008: 3.5%
1 January 2009: 3.9%
1 January 2010: 3.4%
1 January 2011: 1.4%
1 January 2012: 1.6%
1 January 2013: 1.7%
1 January 2014: 1.0%
1 January 2015: 1.0%
1 January 2016: 1.3%
1 January 2017: 2.1%
1 January 2018: 2.4%
united-states politics
asked 5 hours ago
Aaron
1164
New contributor
Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Supposedly, Trump told soldiers in Iraq that (1) he just got them a 10% pay raise, and (2) supposedly also told them that this is the first raise they have received in a decade.
Fact check: Trump brags to troops about 10 percent pay raise he didn't actually give them
Trump misleads about military pay raises again
And a here is a politifact page about this, also claiming it to be a complete lie.
Both facts are being called false by the media. It is being reported that the raise is actually 2.6%, which is not only not 10%, but is not even the largest raise they have received in the decade he mentioned.
Is the military receiving a 10% pay raise?
If not true, and if not a complete fabrication, where does the 10% figure come from?
CNN and NBC have already provided government citation on the "only pay raise in a decade" part, pointing to the pay raises for each year here, and because of that I am asking only about the 10% raise figure, not about the "no raises in a decade" statement.
The basic pay raises since 2007:
1 January 2007: 2.2%
1 April 2007: 0.5%
1 January 2008: 3.5%
1 January 2009: 3.9%
1 January 2010: 3.4%
1 January 2011: 1.4%
1 January 2012: 1.6%
1 January 2013: 1.7%
1 January 2014: 1.0%
1 January 2015: 1.0%
1 January 2016: 1.3%
1 January 2017: 2.1%
1 January 2018: 2.4%
united-states politics
asked 5 hours ago
Aaron
1164
New contributor
Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
I feel like your question has already shown the evidence that the claim is false - what other source are you expecting someone to find? The only source for the claim is a statement by one person known to make false statements to the media, which are often different from the statements made by that same individual minutes, hours, days, or weeks apart. The only person who is likely to know where "10%" came from is Donald Trump, the rest of us can only guess.
– Bryan Krause
4 hours ago
1
I think that the assumption is that sometimes Trump's seemingly false statements have an element of truth, or can be made correct by looking at the truth from a specific and non-intuitive perspective. I believe that is what the asker seeks - is there a perspective or kernel of truth that makes this at least partially true? Or, alternatively, what Fox program did Trump get the 10% figure from?
– cpcodes
4 hours ago
1
@cpcodes I can see that; there might be a kernel of truth in the 10 years in that the 2019 raise is the largest since 2010 and 9 years is almost 10 years if you round up. And 10 years is the same number as 10% if you aren't concerned with the meaning of units or percentage signs. But this seems to be a poor Skeptics approach, because ultimately it resolves to speculation about what is going on in the head of one individual.
– Bryan Krause
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Supposedly, Trump told soldiers in Iraq that (1) he just got them a 10% pay raise, and (2) supposedly also told them that this is the first raise they have received in a decade.
Fact check: Trump brags to troops about 10 percent pay raise he didn't actually give them
Trump misleads about military pay raises again
And a here is a politifact page about this, also claiming it to be a complete lie.
Both facts are being called false by the media. It is being reported that the raise is actually 2.6%, which is not only not 10%, but is not even the largest raise they have received in the decade he mentioned.
Is the military receiving a 10% pay raise?
If not true, and if not a complete fabrication, where does the 10% figure come from?
CNN and NBC have already provided government citation on the "only pay raise in a decade" part, pointing to the pay raises for each year here, and because of that I am asking only about the 10% raise figure, not about the "no raises in a decade" statement.
The basic pay raises since 2007:
1 January 2007: 2.2%
1 April 2007: 0.5%
1 January 2008: 3.5%
1 January 2009: 3.9%
1 January 2010: 3.4%
1 January 2011: 1.4%
1 January 2012: 1.6%
1 January 2013: 1.7%
1 January 2014: 1.0%
1 January 2015: 1.0%
1 January 2016: 1.3%
1 January 2017: 2.1%
1 January 2018: 2.4%
united-states politics
asked 5 hours ago
Aaron
1164
New contributor
Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Supposedly, Trump told soldiers in Iraq that (1) he just got them a 10% pay raise, and (2) supposedly also told them that this is the first raise they have received in a decade.
Fact check: Trump brags to troops about 10 percent pay raise he didn't actually give them
Trump misleads about military pay raises again
And a here is a politifact page about this, also claiming it to be a complete lie.
Both facts are being called false by the media. It is being reported that the raise is actually 2.6%, which is not only not 10%, but is not even the largest raise they have received in the decade he mentioned.
Is the military receiving a 10% pay raise?
If not true, and if not a complete fabrication, where does the 10% figure come from?
CNN and NBC have already provided government citation on the "only pay raise in a decade" part, pointing to the pay raises for each year here, and because of that I am asking only about the 10% raise figure, not about the "no raises in a decade" statement.
The basic pay raises since 2007:
1 January 2007: 2.2%
1 April 2007: 0.5%
1 January 2008: 3.5%
1 January 2009: 3.9%
1 January 2010: 3.4%
1 January 2011: 1.4%
1 January 2012: 1.6%
1 January 2013: 1.7%
1 January 2014: 1.0%
1 January 2015: 1.0%
1 January 2016: 1.3%
1 January 2017: 2.1%
1 January 2018: 2.4%
united-states politics
united-states politics
asked 5 hours ago
Aaron
1164
New contributor
Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 5 hours ago
Aaron
1164
New contributor
Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 4 hours ago
asked 5 hours ago
Aaron
1164
New contributor
Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 5 hours ago
Aaron
1164
asked 5 hours ago
Aaron
1164
1164
New contributor
Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
I feel like your question has already shown the evidence that the claim is false - what other source are you expecting someone to find? The only source for the claim is a statement by one person known to make false statements to the media, which are often different from the statements made by that same individual minutes, hours, days, or weeks apart. The only person who is likely to know where "10%" came from is Donald Trump, the rest of us can only guess.
– Bryan Krause
4 hours ago
1
I think that the assumption is that sometimes Trump's seemingly false statements have an element of truth, or can be made correct by looking at the truth from a specific and non-intuitive perspective. I believe that is what the asker seeks - is there a perspective or kernel of truth that makes this at least partially true? Or, alternatively, what Fox program did Trump get the 10% figure from?
– cpcodes
4 hours ago
1
@cpcodes I can see that; there might be a kernel of truth in the 10 years in that the 2019 raise is the largest since 2010 and 9 years is almost 10 years if you round up. And 10 years is the same number as 10% if you aren't concerned with the meaning of units or percentage signs. But this seems to be a poor Skeptics approach, because ultimately it resolves to speculation about what is going on in the head of one individual.
– Bryan Krause
4 hours ago
add a comment |
3
I feel like your question has already shown the evidence that the claim is false - what other source are you expecting someone to find? The only source for the claim is a statement by one person known to make false statements to the media, which are often different from the statements made by that same individual minutes, hours, days, or weeks apart. The only person who is likely to know where "10%" came from is Donald Trump, the rest of us can only guess.
– Bryan Krause
4 hours ago
1
I think that the assumption is that sometimes Trump's seemingly false statements have an element of truth, or can be made correct by looking at the truth from a specific and non-intuitive perspective. I believe that is what the asker seeks - is there a perspective or kernel of truth that makes this at least partially true? Or, alternatively, what Fox program did Trump get the 10% figure from?
– cpcodes
4 hours ago
1
@cpcodes I can see that; there might be a kernel of truth in the 10 years in that the 2019 raise is the largest since 2010 and 9 years is almost 10 years if you round up. And 10 years is the same number as 10% if you aren't concerned with the meaning of units or percentage signs. But this seems to be a poor Skeptics approach, because ultimately it resolves to speculation about what is going on in the head of one individual.
– Bryan Krause
4 hours ago
3
3
I feel like your question has already shown the evidence that the claim is false - what other source are you expecting someone to find? The only source for the claim is a statement by one person known to make false statements to the media, which are often different from the statements made by that same individual minutes, hours, days, or weeks apart. The only person who is likely to know where "10%" came from is Donald Trump, the rest of us can only guess.
– Bryan Krause
4 hours ago
I feel like your question has already shown the evidence that the claim is false - what other source are you expecting someone to find? The only source for the claim is a statement by one person known to make false statements to the media, which are often different from the statements made by that same individual minutes, hours, days, or weeks apart. The only person who is likely to know where "10%" came from is Donald Trump, the rest of us can only guess.
– Bryan Krause
4 hours ago
1
1
I think that the assumption is that sometimes Trump's seemingly false statements have an element of truth, or can be made correct by looking at the truth from a specific and non-intuitive perspective. I believe that is what the asker seeks - is there a perspective or kernel of truth that makes this at least partially true? Or, alternatively, what Fox program did Trump get the 10% figure from?
– cpcodes
4 hours ago
I think that the assumption is that sometimes Trump's seemingly false statements have an element of truth, or can be made correct by looking at the truth from a specific and non-intuitive perspective. I believe that is what the asker seeks - is there a perspective or kernel of truth that makes this at least partially true? Or, alternatively, what Fox program did Trump get the 10% figure from?
– cpcodes
4 hours ago
1
1
@cpcodes I can see that; there might be a kernel of truth in the 10 years in that the 2019 raise is the largest since 2010 and 9 years is almost 10 years if you round up. And 10 years is the same number as 10% if you aren't concerned with the meaning of units or percentage signs. But this seems to be a poor Skeptics approach, because ultimately it resolves to speculation about what is going on in the head of one individual.
– Bryan Krause
4 hours ago
@cpcodes I can see that; there might be a kernel of truth in the 10 years in that the 2019 raise is the largest since 2010 and 9 years is almost 10 years if you round up. And 10 years is the same number as 10% if you aren't concerned with the meaning of units or percentage signs. But this seems to be a poor Skeptics approach, because ultimately it resolves to speculation about what is going on in the head of one individual.
– Bryan Krause
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
No, they will not.
They will receive a 2.6% pay raise as has been reported in several locations, such as the Washington Post, and by the US Department of Defense.
Such pay raises are in bills passed by Congress and then either signed by the President or passed over his veto by a sufficient Congressional super majority, like all other U.S. appropriations bills.
This is the largest pay raise since 2010, which is less than 10 years earlier than 2019, as indicated in the list of pay raises presented in the OP.
answered 3 hours ago
Bryan Krause
1716
New contributor
Bryan Krause is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
According to militarybenefits.info those who were making $15,800/mo in 2018 got a raise to $15,800.10/mo which is a "10 cent" raise which is easy to mistake for "10 percent" during a speech, especially if the speaker delivers it as "10 uh... cent" with only a very short pause after the "uh".
– SamYonnou
1 hour ago
3
@SamYonnou I don't see that anywhere, and it makes little sense because A) It's about 2018, B) The numbers don't include cents, C) It's about only the very top tier pay rate not about a common soldier, D) 10 cents is nothing near the 2.4% raise in 2017, E) He didn't say "10 uh...cent" and the clear claim was that this was a bigger (bigglier?) than usual raise.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
you can see the 10 cent raise comparing the 2019 to the 2018 pay charts on militarybenefits.info for example in the O-10 grade in the "Over 20" column. The 2.6% raise is for the basic pay rates. Different grades receive a different total increase. And yeah he probably didn't say "10 uh... cent" but I thought it was an amusing technicality.
– SamYonnou
1 hour ago
@SamYonnou Gotcha; it looks like the 2018 chart is simply omitting cents and it's just that the rate for O-10 (and O-9 with sufficient experience) hasn't changed. The 2018 page also mentions $15,800.10 as an upper limit which is due to limits imposed by other federal wage scales. Thus it seems that those of O-9 and O-10 rank are not due the raise at all unless those other scales are adjusted.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
So he lies about pay to his own troops at Christmas - nice!
– Lightness Races in Orbit
8 mins ago
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No, they will not.
They will receive a 2.6% pay raise as has been reported in several locations, such as the Washington Post, and by the US Department of Defense.
Such pay raises are in bills passed by Congress and then either signed by the President or passed over his veto by a sufficient Congressional super majority, like all other U.S. appropriations bills.
This is the largest pay raise since 2010, which is less than 10 years earlier than 2019, as indicated in the list of pay raises presented in the OP.
answered 3 hours ago
Bryan Krause
1716
New contributor
Bryan Krause is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
According to militarybenefits.info those who were making $15,800/mo in 2018 got a raise to $15,800.10/mo which is a "10 cent" raise which is easy to mistake for "10 percent" during a speech, especially if the speaker delivers it as "10 uh... cent" with only a very short pause after the "uh".
– SamYonnou
1 hour ago
3
@SamYonnou I don't see that anywhere, and it makes little sense because A) It's about 2018, B) The numbers don't include cents, C) It's about only the very top tier pay rate not about a common soldier, D) 10 cents is nothing near the 2.4% raise in 2017, E) He didn't say "10 uh...cent" and the clear claim was that this was a bigger (bigglier?) than usual raise.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
you can see the 10 cent raise comparing the 2019 to the 2018 pay charts on militarybenefits.info for example in the O-10 grade in the "Over 20" column. The 2.6% raise is for the basic pay rates. Different grades receive a different total increase. And yeah he probably didn't say "10 uh... cent" but I thought it was an amusing technicality.
– SamYonnou
1 hour ago
@SamYonnou Gotcha; it looks like the 2018 chart is simply omitting cents and it's just that the rate for O-10 (and O-9 with sufficient experience) hasn't changed. The 2018 page also mentions $15,800.10 as an upper limit which is due to limits imposed by other federal wage scales. Thus it seems that those of O-9 and O-10 rank are not due the raise at all unless those other scales are adjusted.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
So he lies about pay to his own troops at Christmas - nice!
– Lightness Races in Orbit
8 mins ago
|
show 1 more comment
No, they will not.
They will receive a 2.6% pay raise as has been reported in several locations, such as the Washington Post, and by the US Department of Defense.
Such pay raises are in bills passed by Congress and then either signed by the President or passed over his veto by a sufficient Congressional super majority, like all other U.S. appropriations bills.
This is the largest pay raise since 2010, which is less than 10 years earlier than 2019, as indicated in the list of pay raises presented in the OP.
answered 3 hours ago
Bryan Krause
1716
New contributor
Bryan Krause is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
According to militarybenefits.info those who were making $15,800/mo in 2018 got a raise to $15,800.10/mo which is a "10 cent" raise which is easy to mistake for "10 percent" during a speech, especially if the speaker delivers it as "10 uh... cent" with only a very short pause after the "uh".
– SamYonnou
1 hour ago
3
@SamYonnou I don't see that anywhere, and it makes little sense because A) It's about 2018, B) The numbers don't include cents, C) It's about only the very top tier pay rate not about a common soldier, D) 10 cents is nothing near the 2.4% raise in 2017, E) He didn't say "10 uh...cent" and the clear claim was that this was a bigger (bigglier?) than usual raise.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
you can see the 10 cent raise comparing the 2019 to the 2018 pay charts on militarybenefits.info for example in the O-10 grade in the "Over 20" column. The 2.6% raise is for the basic pay rates. Different grades receive a different total increase. And yeah he probably didn't say "10 uh... cent" but I thought it was an amusing technicality.
– SamYonnou
1 hour ago
@SamYonnou Gotcha; it looks like the 2018 chart is simply omitting cents and it's just that the rate for O-10 (and O-9 with sufficient experience) hasn't changed. The 2018 page also mentions $15,800.10 as an upper limit which is due to limits imposed by other federal wage scales. Thus it seems that those of O-9 and O-10 rank are not due the raise at all unless those other scales are adjusted.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
So he lies about pay to his own troops at Christmas - nice!
– Lightness Races in Orbit
8 mins ago
|
show 1 more comment
No, they will not.
They will receive a 2.6% pay raise as has been reported in several locations, such as the Washington Post, and by the US Department of Defense.
Such pay raises are in bills passed by Congress and then either signed by the President or passed over his veto by a sufficient Congressional super majority, like all other U.S. appropriations bills.
This is the largest pay raise since 2010, which is less than 10 years earlier than 2019, as indicated in the list of pay raises presented in the OP.
answered 3 hours ago
Bryan Krause
1716
New contributor
Bryan Krause is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
No, they will not.
They will receive a 2.6% pay raise as has been reported in several locations, such as the Washington Post, and by the US Department of Defense.
Such pay raises are in bills passed by Congress and then either signed by the President or passed over his veto by a sufficient Congressional super majority, like all other U.S. appropriations bills.
This is the largest pay raise since 2010, which is less than 10 years earlier than 2019, as indicated in the list of pay raises presented in the OP.
answered 3 hours ago
Bryan Krause
1716
New contributor
Bryan Krause is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 3 hours ago
Bryan Krause
1716
New contributor
Bryan Krause is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 3 hours ago
Bryan Krause
1716
answered 3 hours ago
Bryan Krause
1716
1716
New contributor
Bryan Krause is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Bryan Krause is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Bryan Krause is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
According to militarybenefits.info those who were making $15,800/mo in 2018 got a raise to $15,800.10/mo which is a "10 cent" raise which is easy to mistake for "10 percent" during a speech, especially if the speaker delivers it as "10 uh... cent" with only a very short pause after the "uh".
– SamYonnou
1 hour ago
3
@SamYonnou I don't see that anywhere, and it makes little sense because A) It's about 2018, B) The numbers don't include cents, C) It's about only the very top tier pay rate not about a common soldier, D) 10 cents is nothing near the 2.4% raise in 2017, E) He didn't say "10 uh...cent" and the clear claim was that this was a bigger (bigglier?) than usual raise.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
you can see the 10 cent raise comparing the 2019 to the 2018 pay charts on militarybenefits.info for example in the O-10 grade in the "Over 20" column. The 2.6% raise is for the basic pay rates. Different grades receive a different total increase. And yeah he probably didn't say "10 uh... cent" but I thought it was an amusing technicality.
– SamYonnou
1 hour ago
@SamYonnou Gotcha; it looks like the 2018 chart is simply omitting cents and it's just that the rate for O-10 (and O-9 with sufficient experience) hasn't changed. The 2018 page also mentions $15,800.10 as an upper limit which is due to limits imposed by other federal wage scales. Thus it seems that those of O-9 and O-10 rank are not due the raise at all unless those other scales are adjusted.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
So he lies about pay to his own troops at Christmas - nice!
– Lightness Races in Orbit
8 mins ago
|
show 1 more comment
According to militarybenefits.info those who were making $15,800/mo in 2018 got a raise to $15,800.10/mo which is a "10 cent" raise which is easy to mistake for "10 percent" during a speech, especially if the speaker delivers it as "10 uh... cent" with only a very short pause after the "uh".
– SamYonnou
1 hour ago
3
@SamYonnou I don't see that anywhere, and it makes little sense because A) It's about 2018, B) The numbers don't include cents, C) It's about only the very top tier pay rate not about a common soldier, D) 10 cents is nothing near the 2.4% raise in 2017, E) He didn't say "10 uh...cent" and the clear claim was that this was a bigger (bigglier?) than usual raise.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
you can see the 10 cent raise comparing the 2019 to the 2018 pay charts on militarybenefits.info for example in the O-10 grade in the "Over 20" column. The 2.6% raise is for the basic pay rates. Different grades receive a different total increase. And yeah he probably didn't say "10 uh... cent" but I thought it was an amusing technicality.
– SamYonnou
1 hour ago
@SamYonnou Gotcha; it looks like the 2018 chart is simply omitting cents and it's just that the rate for O-10 (and O-9 with sufficient experience) hasn't changed. The 2018 page also mentions $15,800.10 as an upper limit which is due to limits imposed by other federal wage scales. Thus it seems that those of O-9 and O-10 rank are not due the raise at all unless those other scales are adjusted.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
So he lies about pay to his own troops at Christmas - nice!
– Lightness Races in Orbit
8 mins ago
According to militarybenefits.info those who were making $15,800/mo in 2018 got a raise to $15,800.10/mo which is a "10 cent" raise which is easy to mistake for "10 percent" during a speech, especially if the speaker delivers it as "10 uh... cent" with only a very short pause after the "uh".
– SamYonnou
1 hour ago
According to militarybenefits.info those who were making $15,800/mo in 2018 got a raise to $15,800.10/mo which is a "10 cent" raise which is easy to mistake for "10 percent" during a speech, especially if the speaker delivers it as "10 uh... cent" with only a very short pause after the "uh".
– SamYonnou
1 hour ago
3
3
@SamYonnou I don't see that anywhere, and it makes little sense because A) It's about 2018, B) The numbers don't include cents, C) It's about only the very top tier pay rate not about a common soldier, D) 10 cents is nothing near the 2.4% raise in 2017, E) He didn't say "10 uh...cent" and the clear claim was that this was a bigger (bigglier?) than usual raise.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
@SamYonnou I don't see that anywhere, and it makes little sense because A) It's about 2018, B) The numbers don't include cents, C) It's about only the very top tier pay rate not about a common soldier, D) 10 cents is nothing near the 2.4% raise in 2017, E) He didn't say "10 uh...cent" and the clear claim was that this was a bigger (bigglier?) than usual raise.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
you can see the 10 cent raise comparing the 2019 to the 2018 pay charts on militarybenefits.info for example in the O-10 grade in the "Over 20" column. The 2.6% raise is for the basic pay rates. Different grades receive a different total increase. And yeah he probably didn't say "10 uh... cent" but I thought it was an amusing technicality.
– SamYonnou
1 hour ago
you can see the 10 cent raise comparing the 2019 to the 2018 pay charts on militarybenefits.info for example in the O-10 grade in the "Over 20" column. The 2.6% raise is for the basic pay rates. Different grades receive a different total increase. And yeah he probably didn't say "10 uh... cent" but I thought it was an amusing technicality.
– SamYonnou
1 hour ago
@SamYonnou Gotcha; it looks like the 2018 chart is simply omitting cents and it's just that the rate for O-10 (and O-9 with sufficient experience) hasn't changed. The 2018 page also mentions $15,800.10 as an upper limit which is due to limits imposed by other federal wage scales. Thus it seems that those of O-9 and O-10 rank are not due the raise at all unless those other scales are adjusted.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
@SamYonnou Gotcha; it looks like the 2018 chart is simply omitting cents and it's just that the rate for O-10 (and O-9 with sufficient experience) hasn't changed. The 2018 page also mentions $15,800.10 as an upper limit which is due to limits imposed by other federal wage scales. Thus it seems that those of O-9 and O-10 rank are not due the raise at all unless those other scales are adjusted.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
So he lies about pay to his own troops at Christmas - nice!
– Lightness Races in Orbit
8 mins ago
So he lies about pay to his own troops at Christmas - nice!
– Lightness Races in Orbit
8 mins ago
|
show 1 more comment
3
I feel like your question has already shown the evidence that the claim is false - what other source are you expecting someone to find? The only source for the claim is a statement by one person known to make false statements to the media, which are often different from the statements made by that same individual minutes, hours, days, or weeks apart. The only person who is likely to know where "10%" came from is Donald Trump, the rest of us can only guess.
– Bryan Krause
4 hours ago
1
I think that the assumption is that sometimes Trump's seemingly false statements have an element of truth, or can be made correct by looking at the truth from a specific and non-intuitive perspective. I believe that is what the asker seeks - is there a perspective or kernel of truth that makes this at least partially true? Or, alternatively, what Fox program did Trump get the 10% figure from?
– cpcodes
4 hours ago
1
@cpcodes I can see that; there might be a kernel of truth in the 10 years in that the 2019 raise is the largest since 2010 and 9 years is almost 10 years if you round up. And 10 years is the same number as 10% if you aren't concerned with the meaning of units or percentage signs. But this seems to be a poor Skeptics approach, because ultimately it resolves to speculation about what is going on in the head of one individual.
– Bryan Krause
4 hours ago