Is there a browser that supports IPv6 Link Local addresses?
I'd like to know at last one browser that allows me to browse fe80::4216:7eff:fe9f:79ac%enp2s0f0
, for example. I've checked there're many tickets open in bug trackers of big name browsers like Firefox and Chrome. I know Internet Explorer on Windows is able to provide an option, but I'd like to know anyone on Linux land.
ipv6 browser url
add a comment |
I'd like to know at last one browser that allows me to browse fe80::4216:7eff:fe9f:79ac%enp2s0f0
, for example. I've checked there're many tickets open in bug trackers of big name browsers like Firefox and Chrome. I know Internet Explorer on Windows is able to provide an option, but I'd like to know anyone on Linux land.
ipv6 browser url
All browsers supporthttp://[::1]
as the Link Local self address. None seem to support generic Link Local addresses. Seems to be a problem of scope.
– user79743
Feb 6 '16 at 1:43
add a comment |
I'd like to know at last one browser that allows me to browse fe80::4216:7eff:fe9f:79ac%enp2s0f0
, for example. I've checked there're many tickets open in bug trackers of big name browsers like Firefox and Chrome. I know Internet Explorer on Windows is able to provide an option, but I'd like to know anyone on Linux land.
ipv6 browser url
I'd like to know at last one browser that allows me to browse fe80::4216:7eff:fe9f:79ac%enp2s0f0
, for example. I've checked there're many tickets open in bug trackers of big name browsers like Firefox and Chrome. I know Internet Explorer on Windows is able to provide an option, but I'd like to know anyone on Linux land.
ipv6 browser url
ipv6 browser url
edited Feb 6 '16 at 15:59
muru
1
1
asked Feb 5 '16 at 22:51
pepper_chico
310519
310519
All browsers supporthttp://[::1]
as the Link Local self address. None seem to support generic Link Local addresses. Seems to be a problem of scope.
– user79743
Feb 6 '16 at 1:43
add a comment |
All browsers supporthttp://[::1]
as the Link Local self address. None seem to support generic Link Local addresses. Seems to be a problem of scope.
– user79743
Feb 6 '16 at 1:43
All browsers support
http://[::1]
as the Link Local self address. None seem to support generic Link Local addresses. Seems to be a problem of scope.– user79743
Feb 6 '16 at 1:43
All browsers support
http://[::1]
as the Link Local self address. None seem to support generic Link Local addresses. Seems to be a problem of scope.– user79743
Feb 6 '16 at 1:43
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Same struggle here. But you can use lynx
. I tested it with 2.8.9dev1-2+deb8u1 from the debian Repository.
add a comment |
I have posted a compromise to the firefox ticket, but the chrome one is closed:
1) LL % addresses won't be processed in the Location bar due to the complexity cited.
2) LL % addresses would be processed in file: hosted HTML, and possibly (with some permission) generated by extensions.
This lets someone build an extension that can do things like mDNS or other browsing that finds IoT devices and generates HTML output that can be clicked on.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f260247%2fis-there-a-browser-that-supports-ipv6-link-local-addresses%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Same struggle here. But you can use lynx
. I tested it with 2.8.9dev1-2+deb8u1 from the debian Repository.
add a comment |
Same struggle here. But you can use lynx
. I tested it with 2.8.9dev1-2+deb8u1 from the debian Repository.
add a comment |
Same struggle here. But you can use lynx
. I tested it with 2.8.9dev1-2+deb8u1 from the debian Repository.
Same struggle here. But you can use lynx
. I tested it with 2.8.9dev1-2+deb8u1 from the debian Repository.
answered Jul 8 '16 at 9:12
Moe Kraus
312
312
add a comment |
add a comment |
I have posted a compromise to the firefox ticket, but the chrome one is closed:
1) LL % addresses won't be processed in the Location bar due to the complexity cited.
2) LL % addresses would be processed in file: hosted HTML, and possibly (with some permission) generated by extensions.
This lets someone build an extension that can do things like mDNS or other browsing that finds IoT devices and generates HTML output that can be clicked on.
add a comment |
I have posted a compromise to the firefox ticket, but the chrome one is closed:
1) LL % addresses won't be processed in the Location bar due to the complexity cited.
2) LL % addresses would be processed in file: hosted HTML, and possibly (with some permission) generated by extensions.
This lets someone build an extension that can do things like mDNS or other browsing that finds IoT devices and generates HTML output that can be clicked on.
add a comment |
I have posted a compromise to the firefox ticket, but the chrome one is closed:
1) LL % addresses won't be processed in the Location bar due to the complexity cited.
2) LL % addresses would be processed in file: hosted HTML, and possibly (with some permission) generated by extensions.
This lets someone build an extension that can do things like mDNS or other browsing that finds IoT devices and generates HTML output that can be clicked on.
I have posted a compromise to the firefox ticket, but the chrome one is closed:
1) LL % addresses won't be processed in the Location bar due to the complexity cited.
2) LL % addresses would be processed in file: hosted HTML, and possibly (with some permission) generated by extensions.
This lets someone build an extension that can do things like mDNS or other browsing that finds IoT devices and generates HTML output that can be clicked on.
answered 1 hour ago
mcr
1396
1396
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f260247%2fis-there-a-browser-that-supports-ipv6-link-local-addresses%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
All browsers support
http://[::1]
as the Link Local self address. None seem to support generic Link Local addresses. Seems to be a problem of scope.– user79743
Feb 6 '16 at 1:43