why 16.04 i386 ubuntu doesn't work on 32 bit virtualbox [on hold]











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












On the Ubuntu official site, I downloaded the ubuntu-16.04.5-desktop-i386.iso, and ran it on the vitualbox. After that, the ubuntu doesn't boot. What's went wrong?




  • My computer is 32bit.



image of Virtual box setting



image of after turning on: just a black screen










share|improve this question









New contributor




Drexel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as too broad by Ipor Sircer, RalfFriedl, mosvy, Rui F Ribeiro, Isaac 2 days ago


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • @kemotep Virtual box should work without virtualisation (but slower).
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Nov 24 at 17:56










  • What OS do you have, for the host? 32bit or 64bit? (add result of uname -a)
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Nov 24 at 17:57












  • @ctrl-alt-delor I did not know that. I can remove my comment. Thank you.
    – kemotep
    Nov 24 at 19:53















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












On the Ubuntu official site, I downloaded the ubuntu-16.04.5-desktop-i386.iso, and ran it on the vitualbox. After that, the ubuntu doesn't boot. What's went wrong?




  • My computer is 32bit.



image of Virtual box setting



image of after turning on: just a black screen










share|improve this question









New contributor




Drexel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as too broad by Ipor Sircer, RalfFriedl, mosvy, Rui F Ribeiro, Isaac 2 days ago


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • @kemotep Virtual box should work without virtualisation (but slower).
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Nov 24 at 17:56










  • What OS do you have, for the host? 32bit or 64bit? (add result of uname -a)
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Nov 24 at 17:57












  • @ctrl-alt-delor I did not know that. I can remove my comment. Thank you.
    – kemotep
    Nov 24 at 19:53













up vote
-1
down vote

favorite









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite











On the Ubuntu official site, I downloaded the ubuntu-16.04.5-desktop-i386.iso, and ran it on the vitualbox. After that, the ubuntu doesn't boot. What's went wrong?




  • My computer is 32bit.



image of Virtual box setting



image of after turning on: just a black screen










share|improve this question









New contributor




Drexel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











On the Ubuntu official site, I downloaded the ubuntu-16.04.5-desktop-i386.iso, and ran it on the vitualbox. After that, the ubuntu doesn't boot. What's went wrong?




  • My computer is 32bit.



image of Virtual box setting



image of after turning on: just a black screen







ubuntu virtualbox






share|improve this question









New contributor




Drexel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Drexel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 24 at 17:54









ctrl-alt-delor

10.2k41955




10.2k41955






New contributor




Drexel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Nov 24 at 14:29









Drexel

1




1




New contributor




Drexel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Drexel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Drexel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as too broad by Ipor Sircer, RalfFriedl, mosvy, Rui F Ribeiro, Isaac 2 days ago


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






put on hold as too broad by Ipor Sircer, RalfFriedl, mosvy, Rui F Ribeiro, Isaac 2 days ago


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • @kemotep Virtual box should work without virtualisation (but slower).
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Nov 24 at 17:56










  • What OS do you have, for the host? 32bit or 64bit? (add result of uname -a)
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Nov 24 at 17:57












  • @ctrl-alt-delor I did not know that. I can remove my comment. Thank you.
    – kemotep
    Nov 24 at 19:53


















  • @kemotep Virtual box should work without virtualisation (but slower).
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Nov 24 at 17:56










  • What OS do you have, for the host? 32bit or 64bit? (add result of uname -a)
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Nov 24 at 17:57












  • @ctrl-alt-delor I did not know that. I can remove my comment. Thank you.
    – kemotep
    Nov 24 at 19:53
















@kemotep Virtual box should work without virtualisation (but slower).
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 24 at 17:56




@kemotep Virtual box should work without virtualisation (but slower).
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 24 at 17:56












What OS do you have, for the host? 32bit or 64bit? (add result of uname -a)
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 24 at 17:57






What OS do you have, for the host? 32bit or 64bit? (add result of uname -a)
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 24 at 17:57














@ctrl-alt-delor I did not know that. I can remove my comment. Thank you.
– kemotep
Nov 24 at 19:53




@ctrl-alt-delor I did not know that. I can remove my comment. Thank you.
– kemotep
Nov 24 at 19:53















active

oldest

votes






















active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes

Popular posts from this blog

Entries order in /etc/network/interfaces

新発田市

Grub takes very long (several minutes) to open Menu (in Multi-Boot-System)