Question about errata on page 171 of MetaFontBook











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In errata there is this errata for page 171 of MetaFontBook:



bugonpage C171, line 16 from the bottom (06/18/02)

tenpoint
<loop>is<loop header>|:|<loop text> {tt endfor}


I have an edition of MetafontBook from 1986 (softcover) and from 2012 (hardcover). In both of them text on page 171 is the same as in output produced from errata.tex. Can anybody explain why this text is in errata if it seems not to correct anything?










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    In errata there is this errata for page 171 of MetaFontBook:



    bugonpage C171, line 16 from the bottom (06/18/02)

    tenpoint
    <loop>is<loop header>|:|<loop text> {tt endfor}


    I have an edition of MetafontBook from 1986 (softcover) and from 2012 (hardcover). In both of them text on page 171 is the same as in output produced from errata.tex. Can anybody explain why this text is in errata if it seems not to correct anything?










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      In errata there is this errata for page 171 of MetaFontBook:



      bugonpage C171, line 16 from the bottom (06/18/02)

      tenpoint
      <loop>is<loop header>|:|<loop text> {tt endfor}


      I have an edition of MetafontBook from 1986 (softcover) and from 2012 (hardcover). In both of them text on page 171 is the same as in output produced from errata.tex. Can anybody explain why this text is in errata if it seems not to correct anything?










      share|improve this question













      In errata there is this errata for page 171 of MetaFontBook:



      bugonpage C171, line 16 from the bottom (06/18/02)

      tenpoint
      <loop>is<loop header>|:|<loop text> {tt endfor}


      I have an edition of MetafontBook from 1986 (softcover) and from 2012 (hardcover). In both of them text on page 171 is the same as in output produced from errata.tex. Can anybody explain why this text is in errata if it seems not to correct anything?







      metafont






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 25 mins ago









      Igor Liferenko

      2,042729




      2,042729



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463898%2fquestion-about-errata-on-page-171-of-metafontbook%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463898%2fquestion-about-errata-on-page-171-of-metafontbook%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Accessing regular linux commands in Huawei's Dopra Linux

          Can't connect RFCOMM socket: Host is down

          Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal Exception in Interrupt