Bibliographical reference in reverse chronological order
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I would like to have a bibliography looking like that :
[1] the most recent paper, [2] the less recent paper, [3] older paper
etc... so in reverse chronological order with respect to the publication date.
Is it possible to do that with LaTeX ?
I can't use
usepackage[sorting=ydnt]{biblatex}
because I use also the package multibib.
bibtex
asked Jan 12 at 13:56
Philippe Gaucher
1496
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 13 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I would like to have a bibliography looking like that :
[1] the most recent paper, [2] the less recent paper, [3] older paper
etc... so in reverse chronological order with respect to the publication date.
Is it possible to do that with LaTeX ?
I can't use
usepackage[sorting=ydnt]{biblatex}
because I use also the package multibib.
bibtex
asked Jan 12 at 13:56
Philippe Gaucher
1496
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 13 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
Biblatex natively supports multiple bibliographies. If multibib is the only reason not to switch, you may still consider the possibility.
– gusbrs
Jan 12 at 15:22
@gusbrs I was not aware of that. I have to make the distinction between papers written by me and papers written by other people.
– Philippe Gaucher
Jan 12 at 17:19
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I would like to have a bibliography looking like that :
[1] the most recent paper, [2] the less recent paper, [3] older paper
etc... so in reverse chronological order with respect to the publication date.
Is it possible to do that with LaTeX ?
I can't use
usepackage[sorting=ydnt]{biblatex}
because I use also the package multibib.
bibtex
asked Jan 12 at 13:56
Philippe Gaucher
1496
I would like to have a bibliography looking like that :
[1] the most recent paper, [2] the less recent paper, [3] older paper
etc... so in reverse chronological order with respect to the publication date.
Is it possible to do that with LaTeX ?
I can't use
usepackage[sorting=ydnt]{biblatex}
because I use also the package multibib.
bibtex
bibtex
asked Jan 12 at 13:56
Philippe Gaucher
1496
asked Jan 12 at 13:56
Philippe Gaucher
1496
edited Jan 12 at 14:43
asked Jan 12 at 13:56
Philippe Gaucher
1496
asked Jan 12 at 13:56
Philippe Gaucher
1496
asked Jan 12 at 13:56
Philippe Gaucher
1496
1496
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 13 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 13 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
Biblatex natively supports multiple bibliographies. If multibib is the only reason not to switch, you may still consider the possibility.
– gusbrs
Jan 12 at 15:22
@gusbrs I was not aware of that. I have to make the distinction between papers written by me and papers written by other people.
– Philippe Gaucher
Jan 12 at 17:19
add a comment |
1
Biblatex natively supports multiple bibliographies. If multibib is the only reason not to switch, you may still consider the possibility.
– gusbrs
Jan 12 at 15:22
@gusbrs I was not aware of that. I have to make the distinction between papers written by me and papers written by other people.
– Philippe Gaucher
Jan 12 at 17:19
1
1
Biblatex natively supports multiple bibliographies. If multibib is the only reason not to switch, you may still consider the possibility.
– gusbrs
Jan 12 at 15:22
Biblatex natively supports multiple bibliographies. If multibib is the only reason not to switch, you may still consider the possibility.
– gusbrs
Jan 12 at 15:22
@gusbrs I was not aware of that. I have to make the distinction between papers written by me and papers written by other people.
– Philippe Gaucher
Jan 12 at 17:19
@gusbrs I was not aware of that. I have to make the distinction between papers written by me and papers written by other people.
– Philippe Gaucher
Jan 12 at 17:19
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I've found a solution compatible with the multibib package : http://www.math.cmu.edu/~gautam/sj/blog/20150324-bibtex-reverse.html (package habbrvyr.bst).
answered Jan 12 at 15:04
Philippe Gaucher
1496
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I've found a solution compatible with the multibib package : http://www.math.cmu.edu/~gautam/sj/blog/20150324-bibtex-reverse.html (package habbrvyr.bst).
answered Jan 12 at 15:04
Philippe Gaucher
1496
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I've found a solution compatible with the multibib package : http://www.math.cmu.edu/~gautam/sj/blog/20150324-bibtex-reverse.html (package habbrvyr.bst).
answered Jan 12 at 15:04
Philippe Gaucher
1496
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I've found a solution compatible with the multibib package : http://www.math.cmu.edu/~gautam/sj/blog/20150324-bibtex-reverse.html (package habbrvyr.bst).
answered Jan 12 at 15:04
Philippe Gaucher
1496
I've found a solution compatible with the multibib package : http://www.math.cmu.edu/~gautam/sj/blog/20150324-bibtex-reverse.html (package habbrvyr.bst).
answered Jan 12 at 15:04
Philippe Gaucher
1496
answered Jan 12 at 15:04
Philippe Gaucher
1496
answered Jan 12 at 15:04
Philippe Gaucher
1496
answered Jan 12 at 15:04
Philippe Gaucher
1496
1496
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f410031%2fbibliographical-reference-in-reverse-chronological-order%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Biblatex natively supports multiple bibliographies. If multibib is the only reason not to switch, you may still consider the possibility.
– gusbrs
Jan 12 at 15:22
@gusbrs I was not aware of that. I have to make the distinction between papers written by me and papers written by other people.
– Philippe Gaucher
Jan 12 at 17:19