Typeset sign similar to n choose k, but with curly braces [duplicate]

Multi tool use
Multi tool use











up vote
3
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:




  • How to write Stirling numbers of the second kind?

    4 answers




Question



I am looking for a way to typeset two variables over each other similar to binom{n}{k} or {n choose k}. The only difference is that it should be surrounded in curly braces instead of round ones. Is there a proper way to do it?



My workaround



I've already attempted working around this using the following approach:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
This is a text containing
$begin{cases}
begin{rcases}
n \
k\
end{rcases}
end{cases}$,
my mathematical symbol.

My binomial $binom{n}{k}$ for comparison.
end{document}


Unfortunately, it is an ugly workaround. The braces and size of the font are too big, as seen compared to the properly typeset binomial. Additionally, there's a huge amount of space on the right.










share|improve this question







New contributor




StckXchnge-nub12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











marked as duplicate by Werner math-mode
Users with the  math-mode badge can single-handedly close math-mode questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
9 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.



















    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite













    This question already has an answer here:




    • How to write Stirling numbers of the second kind?

      4 answers




    Question



    I am looking for a way to typeset two variables over each other similar to binom{n}{k} or {n choose k}. The only difference is that it should be surrounded in curly braces instead of round ones. Is there a proper way to do it?



    My workaround



    I've already attempted working around this using the following approach:



    documentclass{article}

    usepackage{amsmath}
    usepackage{mathtools}
    begin{document}
    This is a text containing
    $begin{cases}
    begin{rcases}
    n \
    k\
    end{rcases}
    end{cases}$,
    my mathematical symbol.

    My binomial $binom{n}{k}$ for comparison.
    end{document}


    Unfortunately, it is an ugly workaround. The braces and size of the font are too big, as seen compared to the properly typeset binomial. Additionally, there's a huge amount of space on the right.










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    StckXchnge-nub12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.











    marked as duplicate by Werner math-mode
    Users with the  math-mode badge can single-handedly close math-mode questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

    $('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
    var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
    $msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

    $hover.hover(
    function() {
    $hover.showInfoMessage('', {
    messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
    transient: false,
    position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
    dismissable: false,
    relativeToBody: true
    });
    },
    function() {
    StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
    }
    );
    });
    });
    9 hours ago


    This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

















      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite












      This question already has an answer here:




      • How to write Stirling numbers of the second kind?

        4 answers




      Question



      I am looking for a way to typeset two variables over each other similar to binom{n}{k} or {n choose k}. The only difference is that it should be surrounded in curly braces instead of round ones. Is there a proper way to do it?



      My workaround



      I've already attempted working around this using the following approach:



      documentclass{article}

      usepackage{amsmath}
      usepackage{mathtools}
      begin{document}
      This is a text containing
      $begin{cases}
      begin{rcases}
      n \
      k\
      end{rcases}
      end{cases}$,
      my mathematical symbol.

      My binomial $binom{n}{k}$ for comparison.
      end{document}


      Unfortunately, it is an ugly workaround. The braces and size of the font are too big, as seen compared to the properly typeset binomial. Additionally, there's a huge amount of space on the right.










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      StckXchnge-nub12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      This question already has an answer here:




      • How to write Stirling numbers of the second kind?

        4 answers




      Question



      I am looking for a way to typeset two variables over each other similar to binom{n}{k} or {n choose k}. The only difference is that it should be surrounded in curly braces instead of round ones. Is there a proper way to do it?



      My workaround



      I've already attempted working around this using the following approach:



      documentclass{article}

      usepackage{amsmath}
      usepackage{mathtools}
      begin{document}
      This is a text containing
      $begin{cases}
      begin{rcases}
      n \
      k\
      end{rcases}
      end{cases}$,
      my mathematical symbol.

      My binomial $binom{n}{k}$ for comparison.
      end{document}


      Unfortunately, it is an ugly workaround. The braces and size of the font are too big, as seen compared to the properly typeset binomial. Additionally, there's a huge amount of space on the right.





      This question already has an answer here:




      • How to write Stirling numbers of the second kind?

        4 answers








      math-mode amsmath






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      StckXchnge-nub12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      StckXchnge-nub12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      StckXchnge-nub12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 9 hours ago









      StckXchnge-nub12

      182




      182




      New contributor




      StckXchnge-nub12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      StckXchnge-nub12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      StckXchnge-nub12 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




      marked as duplicate by Werner math-mode
      Users with the  math-mode badge can single-handedly close math-mode questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

      $('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
      var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
      $msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

      $hover.hover(
      function() {
      $hover.showInfoMessage('', {
      messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
      transient: false,
      position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
      dismissable: false,
      relativeToBody: true
      });
      },
      function() {
      StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
      }
      );
      });
      });
      9 hours ago


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






      marked as duplicate by Werner math-mode
      Users with the  math-mode badge can single-handedly close math-mode questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

      $('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
      var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
      $msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

      $hover.hover(
      function() {
      $hover.showInfoMessage('', {
      messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
      transient: false,
      position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
      dismissable: false,
      relativeToBody: true
      });
      },
      function() {
      StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
      }
      );
      });
      });
      9 hours ago


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          You should construct it the same way amsmath's binom uses genfrac{<ldelim>}{<rdelim>}{<width>}{<math style>}{<numerator>}{<denominator>}:



          enter image description here



          documentclass{article}

          usepackage{amsmath}

          newcommand{bracenom}{genfrac{lbrace}{rbrace}{0pt}{}}

          begin{document}

          My binomial $binom{n}{k}$ for comparison with $bracenom{n}{k}$.

          end{document}


          Leaving the <math style> empty implies that the current math style will be used. You can also define dbracenom to use <math style> = 0 and tbracenom to use <math style> = 1. Here are the similar definitions for binom-and-friends:



          DeclareRobustCommand{binom}{genfrac()z@{}}
          newcommand{dbinom}{genfrac(){0pt}0}
          newcommand{tbinom}{genfrac(){0pt}1}


          <width> refers to the rule between the <numerator> and <denominator>.






          share|improve this answer




























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            You should construct it the same way amsmath's binom uses genfrac{<ldelim>}{<rdelim>}{<width>}{<math style>}{<numerator>}{<denominator>}:



            enter image description here



            documentclass{article}

            usepackage{amsmath}

            newcommand{bracenom}{genfrac{lbrace}{rbrace}{0pt}{}}

            begin{document}

            My binomial $binom{n}{k}$ for comparison with $bracenom{n}{k}$.

            end{document}


            Leaving the <math style> empty implies that the current math style will be used. You can also define dbracenom to use <math style> = 0 and tbracenom to use <math style> = 1. Here are the similar definitions for binom-and-friends:



            DeclareRobustCommand{binom}{genfrac()z@{}}
            newcommand{dbinom}{genfrac(){0pt}0}
            newcommand{tbinom}{genfrac(){0pt}1}


            <width> refers to the rule between the <numerator> and <denominator>.






            share|improve this answer

























              up vote
              2
              down vote



              accepted










              You should construct it the same way amsmath's binom uses genfrac{<ldelim>}{<rdelim>}{<width>}{<math style>}{<numerator>}{<denominator>}:



              enter image description here



              documentclass{article}

              usepackage{amsmath}

              newcommand{bracenom}{genfrac{lbrace}{rbrace}{0pt}{}}

              begin{document}

              My binomial $binom{n}{k}$ for comparison with $bracenom{n}{k}$.

              end{document}


              Leaving the <math style> empty implies that the current math style will be used. You can also define dbracenom to use <math style> = 0 and tbracenom to use <math style> = 1. Here are the similar definitions for binom-and-friends:



              DeclareRobustCommand{binom}{genfrac()z@{}}
              newcommand{dbinom}{genfrac(){0pt}0}
              newcommand{tbinom}{genfrac(){0pt}1}


              <width> refers to the rule between the <numerator> and <denominator>.






              share|improve this answer























                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted






                You should construct it the same way amsmath's binom uses genfrac{<ldelim>}{<rdelim>}{<width>}{<math style>}{<numerator>}{<denominator>}:



                enter image description here



                documentclass{article}

                usepackage{amsmath}

                newcommand{bracenom}{genfrac{lbrace}{rbrace}{0pt}{}}

                begin{document}

                My binomial $binom{n}{k}$ for comparison with $bracenom{n}{k}$.

                end{document}


                Leaving the <math style> empty implies that the current math style will be used. You can also define dbracenom to use <math style> = 0 and tbracenom to use <math style> = 1. Here are the similar definitions for binom-and-friends:



                DeclareRobustCommand{binom}{genfrac()z@{}}
                newcommand{dbinom}{genfrac(){0pt}0}
                newcommand{tbinom}{genfrac(){0pt}1}


                <width> refers to the rule between the <numerator> and <denominator>.






                share|improve this answer












                You should construct it the same way amsmath's binom uses genfrac{<ldelim>}{<rdelim>}{<width>}{<math style>}{<numerator>}{<denominator>}:



                enter image description here



                documentclass{article}

                usepackage{amsmath}

                newcommand{bracenom}{genfrac{lbrace}{rbrace}{0pt}{}}

                begin{document}

                My binomial $binom{n}{k}$ for comparison with $bracenom{n}{k}$.

                end{document}


                Leaving the <math style> empty implies that the current math style will be used. You can also define dbracenom to use <math style> = 0 and tbracenom to use <math style> = 1. Here are the similar definitions for binom-and-friends:



                DeclareRobustCommand{binom}{genfrac()z@{}}
                newcommand{dbinom}{genfrac(){0pt}0}
                newcommand{tbinom}{genfrac(){0pt}1}


                <width> refers to the rule between the <numerator> and <denominator>.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 9 hours ago









                Werner

                432k609511632




                432k609511632















                    TDKP,nArXNJJt0 K,D9jW8lGn,VxBSD1irk wQ LShjv7XLctX VtSDiofC aGxHE
                    0lxScXjQinCvib2GQlEJcxfI4JueLGoROkVbtQvW4BqK0W2DU1 E6WI,9,NpdeA,lX 3P kIM2xmp7cJ,g 29y1seR,uyQq

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Accessing regular linux commands in Huawei's Dopra Linux

                    Can't connect RFCOMM socket: Host is down

                    Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal Exception in Interrupt