Invalid signatures when running apt-get update
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I am trying to run an update, I get a lot of "Hit"'s and "Ign"'s but in the end I get these errors, does anybody know what they mean and how I can fix them?
W: GPG error: http://speglar.simnet.is olivia Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 3EE67F3D0FF405B2 Clement Lefebvre (Linux Mint Package Repository v1) <root@linuxmint.com>
W: GPG error: http://speglar.simnet.is raring Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <ftpmaster@ubuntu.com>
W: GPG error: http://archive.canonical.com raring Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <ftpmaster@ubuntu.com>
W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net raring Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 5A9A06AEF9CB8DB0 Launchpad PPA for Ubuntu Wine Team
ubuntu apt gpg
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I am trying to run an update, I get a lot of "Hit"'s and "Ign"'s but in the end I get these errors, does anybody know what they mean and how I can fix them?
W: GPG error: http://speglar.simnet.is olivia Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 3EE67F3D0FF405B2 Clement Lefebvre (Linux Mint Package Repository v1) <root@linuxmint.com>
W: GPG error: http://speglar.simnet.is raring Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <ftpmaster@ubuntu.com>
W: GPG error: http://archive.canonical.com raring Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <ftpmaster@ubuntu.com>
W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net raring Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 5A9A06AEF9CB8DB0 Launchpad PPA for Ubuntu Wine Team
ubuntu apt gpg
Each repository (more or less) has its own key to sign packages. Did you runapt-key
or a corresponding GUI to install extra keys for these repositories?
– Gilles
Oct 24 '13 at 23:50
I'm not sure how to do that, can I run gedit apt-key and add these keys into the file? What are these keys anyway?
– Noosgam
Oct 25 '13 at 0:00
You add a key by running theapt-key
command (or with an equivalent GUI, for example the interface to add a PPA in the default software manager on Ubuntu does that automatically), you can't edit a file directly. Expand “Technical details about this PPA” then click on “What is this?” after “Signing key” in a PPA page for more explanations. The purpose of the signing key is to verify that the package files that you receive are genuine.
– Gilles
Oct 25 '13 at 0:05
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I am trying to run an update, I get a lot of "Hit"'s and "Ign"'s but in the end I get these errors, does anybody know what they mean and how I can fix them?
W: GPG error: http://speglar.simnet.is olivia Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 3EE67F3D0FF405B2 Clement Lefebvre (Linux Mint Package Repository v1) <root@linuxmint.com>
W: GPG error: http://speglar.simnet.is raring Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <ftpmaster@ubuntu.com>
W: GPG error: http://archive.canonical.com raring Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <ftpmaster@ubuntu.com>
W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net raring Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 5A9A06AEF9CB8DB0 Launchpad PPA for Ubuntu Wine Team
ubuntu apt gpg
I am trying to run an update, I get a lot of "Hit"'s and "Ign"'s but in the end I get these errors, does anybody know what they mean and how I can fix them?
W: GPG error: http://speglar.simnet.is olivia Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 3EE67F3D0FF405B2 Clement Lefebvre (Linux Mint Package Repository v1) <root@linuxmint.com>
W: GPG error: http://speglar.simnet.is raring Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <ftpmaster@ubuntu.com>
W: GPG error: http://archive.canonical.com raring Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <ftpmaster@ubuntu.com>
W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net raring Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 5A9A06AEF9CB8DB0 Launchpad PPA for Ubuntu Wine Team
ubuntu apt gpg
ubuntu apt gpg
edited Nov 24 at 20:05
Rui F Ribeiro
38.3k1475126
38.3k1475126
asked Oct 24 '13 at 23:42
Noosgam
38115
38115
Each repository (more or less) has its own key to sign packages. Did you runapt-key
or a corresponding GUI to install extra keys for these repositories?
– Gilles
Oct 24 '13 at 23:50
I'm not sure how to do that, can I run gedit apt-key and add these keys into the file? What are these keys anyway?
– Noosgam
Oct 25 '13 at 0:00
You add a key by running theapt-key
command (or with an equivalent GUI, for example the interface to add a PPA in the default software manager on Ubuntu does that automatically), you can't edit a file directly. Expand “Technical details about this PPA” then click on “What is this?” after “Signing key” in a PPA page for more explanations. The purpose of the signing key is to verify that the package files that you receive are genuine.
– Gilles
Oct 25 '13 at 0:05
add a comment |
Each repository (more or less) has its own key to sign packages. Did you runapt-key
or a corresponding GUI to install extra keys for these repositories?
– Gilles
Oct 24 '13 at 23:50
I'm not sure how to do that, can I run gedit apt-key and add these keys into the file? What are these keys anyway?
– Noosgam
Oct 25 '13 at 0:00
You add a key by running theapt-key
command (or with an equivalent GUI, for example the interface to add a PPA in the default software manager on Ubuntu does that automatically), you can't edit a file directly. Expand “Technical details about this PPA” then click on “What is this?” after “Signing key” in a PPA page for more explanations. The purpose of the signing key is to verify that the package files that you receive are genuine.
– Gilles
Oct 25 '13 at 0:05
Each repository (more or less) has its own key to sign packages. Did you run
apt-key
or a corresponding GUI to install extra keys for these repositories?– Gilles
Oct 24 '13 at 23:50
Each repository (more or less) has its own key to sign packages. Did you run
apt-key
or a corresponding GUI to install extra keys for these repositories?– Gilles
Oct 24 '13 at 23:50
I'm not sure how to do that, can I run gedit apt-key and add these keys into the file? What are these keys anyway?
– Noosgam
Oct 25 '13 at 0:00
I'm not sure how to do that, can I run gedit apt-key and add these keys into the file? What are these keys anyway?
– Noosgam
Oct 25 '13 at 0:00
You add a key by running the
apt-key
command (or with an equivalent GUI, for example the interface to add a PPA in the default software manager on Ubuntu does that automatically), you can't edit a file directly. Expand “Technical details about this PPA” then click on “What is this?” after “Signing key” in a PPA page for more explanations. The purpose of the signing key is to verify that the package files that you receive are genuine.– Gilles
Oct 25 '13 at 0:05
You add a key by running the
apt-key
command (or with an equivalent GUI, for example the interface to add a PPA in the default software manager on Ubuntu does that automatically), you can't edit a file directly. Expand “Technical details about this PPA” then click on “What is this?” after “Signing key” in a PPA page for more explanations. The purpose of the signing key is to verify that the package files that you receive are genuine.– Gilles
Oct 25 '13 at 0:05
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
As Gilles explained, most Linux repositories are signed with GPG encryption keys. apt
then uses these keys to ensure the authenticity of the repositories. In order to safely use a repository, you need to add it's keys to the list that apt
considers trusted.
Each necessary key needs to be downloaded from a key server which is done with this command (I am using keyserver.ubuntu.com
but you can use others):
apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com KEY_NAME
From man apt-key
:
adv
Pass advanced options to gpg. With adv --recv-key you can download
the public key.
In your case, apt
is complaining about keys 3EE67F3D0FF405B2
,40976EAF437D05B5
,40976EAF437D05B5
and 5A9A06AEF9CB8DB0
, you can get all three of them by running:
sudo apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com 3EE67F3D0FF405B2 40976EAF437D05B5 40976EAF437D05B5 5A9A06AEF9CB8DB0
If all goes well you should see various lines of output including:
gpg: Total number processed: 4
gpg: imported: 4 (RSA: 1)
gpg: unchanged: 0
gpg: new signatures: 4
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Alternate possibility, if your apt-get/aptitude has been found in an unusual state recently, is that its internal lists are damaged and incompatible with the true keys. Cleaning the cache and restarting on fresh basis can help:
sudo rm -r /var/lib/apt/lists
sudo mkdir -p /var/lib/apt/lists/partial
sudo aptitude update
(op: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=802156&p=9697234#post9697234 )
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
As Gilles explained, most Linux repositories are signed with GPG encryption keys. apt
then uses these keys to ensure the authenticity of the repositories. In order to safely use a repository, you need to add it's keys to the list that apt
considers trusted.
Each necessary key needs to be downloaded from a key server which is done with this command (I am using keyserver.ubuntu.com
but you can use others):
apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com KEY_NAME
From man apt-key
:
adv
Pass advanced options to gpg. With adv --recv-key you can download
the public key.
In your case, apt
is complaining about keys 3EE67F3D0FF405B2
,40976EAF437D05B5
,40976EAF437D05B5
and 5A9A06AEF9CB8DB0
, you can get all three of them by running:
sudo apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com 3EE67F3D0FF405B2 40976EAF437D05B5 40976EAF437D05B5 5A9A06AEF9CB8DB0
If all goes well you should see various lines of output including:
gpg: Total number processed: 4
gpg: imported: 4 (RSA: 1)
gpg: unchanged: 0
gpg: new signatures: 4
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
As Gilles explained, most Linux repositories are signed with GPG encryption keys. apt
then uses these keys to ensure the authenticity of the repositories. In order to safely use a repository, you need to add it's keys to the list that apt
considers trusted.
Each necessary key needs to be downloaded from a key server which is done with this command (I am using keyserver.ubuntu.com
but you can use others):
apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com KEY_NAME
From man apt-key
:
adv
Pass advanced options to gpg. With adv --recv-key you can download
the public key.
In your case, apt
is complaining about keys 3EE67F3D0FF405B2
,40976EAF437D05B5
,40976EAF437D05B5
and 5A9A06AEF9CB8DB0
, you can get all three of them by running:
sudo apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com 3EE67F3D0FF405B2 40976EAF437D05B5 40976EAF437D05B5 5A9A06AEF9CB8DB0
If all goes well you should see various lines of output including:
gpg: Total number processed: 4
gpg: imported: 4 (RSA: 1)
gpg: unchanged: 0
gpg: new signatures: 4
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
As Gilles explained, most Linux repositories are signed with GPG encryption keys. apt
then uses these keys to ensure the authenticity of the repositories. In order to safely use a repository, you need to add it's keys to the list that apt
considers trusted.
Each necessary key needs to be downloaded from a key server which is done with this command (I am using keyserver.ubuntu.com
but you can use others):
apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com KEY_NAME
From man apt-key
:
adv
Pass advanced options to gpg. With adv --recv-key you can download
the public key.
In your case, apt
is complaining about keys 3EE67F3D0FF405B2
,40976EAF437D05B5
,40976EAF437D05B5
and 5A9A06AEF9CB8DB0
, you can get all three of them by running:
sudo apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com 3EE67F3D0FF405B2 40976EAF437D05B5 40976EAF437D05B5 5A9A06AEF9CB8DB0
If all goes well you should see various lines of output including:
gpg: Total number processed: 4
gpg: imported: 4 (RSA: 1)
gpg: unchanged: 0
gpg: new signatures: 4
As Gilles explained, most Linux repositories are signed with GPG encryption keys. apt
then uses these keys to ensure the authenticity of the repositories. In order to safely use a repository, you need to add it's keys to the list that apt
considers trusted.
Each necessary key needs to be downloaded from a key server which is done with this command (I am using keyserver.ubuntu.com
but you can use others):
apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com KEY_NAME
From man apt-key
:
adv
Pass advanced options to gpg. With adv --recv-key you can download
the public key.
In your case, apt
is complaining about keys 3EE67F3D0FF405B2
,40976EAF437D05B5
,40976EAF437D05B5
and 5A9A06AEF9CB8DB0
, you can get all three of them by running:
sudo apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com 3EE67F3D0FF405B2 40976EAF437D05B5 40976EAF437D05B5 5A9A06AEF9CB8DB0
If all goes well you should see various lines of output including:
gpg: Total number processed: 4
gpg: imported: 4 (RSA: 1)
gpg: unchanged: 0
gpg: new signatures: 4
answered Oct 25 '13 at 1:05
terdon♦
126k31243419
126k31243419
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Alternate possibility, if your apt-get/aptitude has been found in an unusual state recently, is that its internal lists are damaged and incompatible with the true keys. Cleaning the cache and restarting on fresh basis can help:
sudo rm -r /var/lib/apt/lists
sudo mkdir -p /var/lib/apt/lists/partial
sudo aptitude update
(op: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=802156&p=9697234#post9697234 )
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Alternate possibility, if your apt-get/aptitude has been found in an unusual state recently, is that its internal lists are damaged and incompatible with the true keys. Cleaning the cache and restarting on fresh basis can help:
sudo rm -r /var/lib/apt/lists
sudo mkdir -p /var/lib/apt/lists/partial
sudo aptitude update
(op: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=802156&p=9697234#post9697234 )
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Alternate possibility, if your apt-get/aptitude has been found in an unusual state recently, is that its internal lists are damaged and incompatible with the true keys. Cleaning the cache and restarting on fresh basis can help:
sudo rm -r /var/lib/apt/lists
sudo mkdir -p /var/lib/apt/lists/partial
sudo aptitude update
(op: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=802156&p=9697234#post9697234 )
Alternate possibility, if your apt-get/aptitude has been found in an unusual state recently, is that its internal lists are damaged and incompatible with the true keys. Cleaning the cache and restarting on fresh basis can help:
sudo rm -r /var/lib/apt/lists
sudo mkdir -p /var/lib/apt/lists/partial
sudo aptitude update
(op: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=802156&p=9697234#post9697234 )
answered Jan 22 '15 at 9:04
PypeBros
1314
1314
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f97493%2finvalid-signatures-when-running-apt-get-update%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Each repository (more or less) has its own key to sign packages. Did you run
apt-key
or a corresponding GUI to install extra keys for these repositories?– Gilles
Oct 24 '13 at 23:50
I'm not sure how to do that, can I run gedit apt-key and add these keys into the file? What are these keys anyway?
– Noosgam
Oct 25 '13 at 0:00
You add a key by running the
apt-key
command (or with an equivalent GUI, for example the interface to add a PPA in the default software manager on Ubuntu does that automatically), you can't edit a file directly. Expand “Technical details about this PPA” then click on “What is this?” after “Signing key” in a PPA page for more explanations. The purpose of the signing key is to verify that the package files that you receive are genuine.– Gilles
Oct 25 '13 at 0:05