BibTeX: same layout of all entries in bibliography?
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm writing a "report" and using BibTeX for the literature and I have different types of BibTeX entries like book, article, misc, PhdThesis, MastersThesis, ...
urlstyle{same}
bibliographystyle{agsm} %Harvard style
bibliography{literature}
I want to make all entries formatted the same for the same fields (e.g. all titles field are formatted italic, independent of the BiBTeX entry type).
A little bit like the URL formatting.
I have found an similar question from 2015 about the same topic:
Get same layout for title-tag in misc and book using natbib
Is there a simpler method instead of replacing the bst
of each entry to make it appear the same?
Here is the example of a minimum:
documentclass{report}
begin{document}
I cite citep{Luhmann1979}.
urlstyle{same}
bibliography{literature}
bibliographystyle{agsm}
end{document}
Examples of my BibTeX entries:
@Book{Luhmann1979,
title = {Trust and power},
publisher = {John Wiley & Sons},
year = {1979},
author = {Luhmann, Niklas},
}
@Article{Doney1998,
author = {Doney, Patricia M and Cannon, Joseph P and Mullen, Michael R},
title = {Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust},
journal = {Academy of management review},
year = {1998},
volume = {23},
number = {3},
pages = {601--620},
publisher = {Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510},
}
Thank you very much
bibtex
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm writing a "report" and using BibTeX for the literature and I have different types of BibTeX entries like book, article, misc, PhdThesis, MastersThesis, ...
urlstyle{same}
bibliographystyle{agsm} %Harvard style
bibliography{literature}
I want to make all entries formatted the same for the same fields (e.g. all titles field are formatted italic, independent of the BiBTeX entry type).
A little bit like the URL formatting.
I have found an similar question from 2015 about the same topic:
Get same layout for title-tag in misc and book using natbib
Is there a simpler method instead of replacing the bst
of each entry to make it appear the same?
Here is the example of a minimum:
documentclass{report}
begin{document}
I cite citep{Luhmann1979}.
urlstyle{same}
bibliography{literature}
bibliographystyle{agsm}
end{document}
Examples of my BibTeX entries:
@Book{Luhmann1979,
title = {Trust and power},
publisher = {John Wiley & Sons},
year = {1979},
author = {Luhmann, Niklas},
}
@Article{Doney1998,
author = {Doney, Patricia M and Cannon, Joseph P and Mullen, Michael R},
title = {Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust},
journal = {Academy of management review},
year = {1998},
volume = {23},
number = {3},
pages = {601--620},
publisher = {Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510},
}
Thank you very much
bibtex
1
Short answer: no. I think that your best options are fighting against thecustom-bib
endless questionnaire or switch tobiblatex
. Not sure what will be worse in your case, but none is simple.
– Fran
8 hours ago
@Fran: How would it work, if I switch to biblatex? And is the switch of the bibtex file to biblatex manual or can it be converted?
– Eric
7 hours ago
The bibtex file can be used as is withbiblatex
. Here you have a quick introduction of how use it. You get an idea of what mean a custom biblatex style in this question (but it does not have to be so tangled in your case).
– Fran
7 hours ago
Why would you want this? Is there a style which requires it? If so, have you searched for an existing.bst
?
– cfr
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm writing a "report" and using BibTeX for the literature and I have different types of BibTeX entries like book, article, misc, PhdThesis, MastersThesis, ...
urlstyle{same}
bibliographystyle{agsm} %Harvard style
bibliography{literature}
I want to make all entries formatted the same for the same fields (e.g. all titles field are formatted italic, independent of the BiBTeX entry type).
A little bit like the URL formatting.
I have found an similar question from 2015 about the same topic:
Get same layout for title-tag in misc and book using natbib
Is there a simpler method instead of replacing the bst
of each entry to make it appear the same?
Here is the example of a minimum:
documentclass{report}
begin{document}
I cite citep{Luhmann1979}.
urlstyle{same}
bibliography{literature}
bibliographystyle{agsm}
end{document}
Examples of my BibTeX entries:
@Book{Luhmann1979,
title = {Trust and power},
publisher = {John Wiley & Sons},
year = {1979},
author = {Luhmann, Niklas},
}
@Article{Doney1998,
author = {Doney, Patricia M and Cannon, Joseph P and Mullen, Michael R},
title = {Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust},
journal = {Academy of management review},
year = {1998},
volume = {23},
number = {3},
pages = {601--620},
publisher = {Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510},
}
Thank you very much
bibtex
I'm writing a "report" and using BibTeX for the literature and I have different types of BibTeX entries like book, article, misc, PhdThesis, MastersThesis, ...
urlstyle{same}
bibliographystyle{agsm} %Harvard style
bibliography{literature}
I want to make all entries formatted the same for the same fields (e.g. all titles field are formatted italic, independent of the BiBTeX entry type).
A little bit like the URL formatting.
I have found an similar question from 2015 about the same topic:
Get same layout for title-tag in misc and book using natbib
Is there a simpler method instead of replacing the bst
of each entry to make it appear the same?
Here is the example of a minimum:
documentclass{report}
begin{document}
I cite citep{Luhmann1979}.
urlstyle{same}
bibliography{literature}
bibliographystyle{agsm}
end{document}
Examples of my BibTeX entries:
@Book{Luhmann1979,
title = {Trust and power},
publisher = {John Wiley & Sons},
year = {1979},
author = {Luhmann, Niklas},
}
@Article{Doney1998,
author = {Doney, Patricia M and Cannon, Joseph P and Mullen, Michael R},
title = {Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust},
journal = {Academy of management review},
year = {1998},
volume = {23},
number = {3},
pages = {601--620},
publisher = {Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510},
}
Thank you very much
bibtex
bibtex
asked 9 hours ago
Eric
63
63
1
Short answer: no. I think that your best options are fighting against thecustom-bib
endless questionnaire or switch tobiblatex
. Not sure what will be worse in your case, but none is simple.
– Fran
8 hours ago
@Fran: How would it work, if I switch to biblatex? And is the switch of the bibtex file to biblatex manual or can it be converted?
– Eric
7 hours ago
The bibtex file can be used as is withbiblatex
. Here you have a quick introduction of how use it. You get an idea of what mean a custom biblatex style in this question (but it does not have to be so tangled in your case).
– Fran
7 hours ago
Why would you want this? Is there a style which requires it? If so, have you searched for an existing.bst
?
– cfr
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
Short answer: no. I think that your best options are fighting against thecustom-bib
endless questionnaire or switch tobiblatex
. Not sure what will be worse in your case, but none is simple.
– Fran
8 hours ago
@Fran: How would it work, if I switch to biblatex? And is the switch of the bibtex file to biblatex manual or can it be converted?
– Eric
7 hours ago
The bibtex file can be used as is withbiblatex
. Here you have a quick introduction of how use it. You get an idea of what mean a custom biblatex style in this question (but it does not have to be so tangled in your case).
– Fran
7 hours ago
Why would you want this? Is there a style which requires it? If so, have you searched for an existing.bst
?
– cfr
1 hour ago
1
1
Short answer: no. I think that your best options are fighting against the
custom-bib
endless questionnaire or switch to biblatex
. Not sure what will be worse in your case, but none is simple.– Fran
8 hours ago
Short answer: no. I think that your best options are fighting against the
custom-bib
endless questionnaire or switch to biblatex
. Not sure what will be worse in your case, but none is simple.– Fran
8 hours ago
@Fran: How would it work, if I switch to biblatex? And is the switch of the bibtex file to biblatex manual or can it be converted?
– Eric
7 hours ago
@Fran: How would it work, if I switch to biblatex? And is the switch of the bibtex file to biblatex manual or can it be converted?
– Eric
7 hours ago
The bibtex file can be used as is with
biblatex
. Here you have a quick introduction of how use it. You get an idea of what mean a custom biblatex style in this question (but it does not have to be so tangled in your case).– Fran
7 hours ago
The bibtex file can be used as is with
biblatex
. Here you have a quick introduction of how use it. You get an idea of what mean a custom biblatex style in this question (but it does not have to be so tangled in your case).– Fran
7 hours ago
Why would you want this? Is there a style which requires it? If so, have you searched for an existing
.bst
?– cfr
1 hour ago
Why would you want this? Is there a style which requires it? If so, have you searched for an existing
.bst
?– cfr
1 hour ago
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462044%2fbibtex-same-layout-of-all-entries-in-bibliography%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Short answer: no. I think that your best options are fighting against the
custom-bib
endless questionnaire or switch tobiblatex
. Not sure what will be worse in your case, but none is simple.– Fran
8 hours ago
@Fran: How would it work, if I switch to biblatex? And is the switch of the bibtex file to biblatex manual or can it be converted?
– Eric
7 hours ago
The bibtex file can be used as is with
biblatex
. Here you have a quick introduction of how use it. You get an idea of what mean a custom biblatex style in this question (but it does not have to be so tangled in your case).– Fran
7 hours ago
Why would you want this? Is there a style which requires it? If so, have you searched for an existing
.bst
?– cfr
1 hour ago