Book of lemmas (propositions)











up vote
12
down vote

favorite
2













A book consists of 100 pages and contains 100 lemmas and some images. Each lemma is at most one page long and can't be split into two pages (it has to fit in one page). The lemmas are numbered from 1 to 100 and are written in ascending order. Prove that there must be at least one lemma written on a page with the same number as the lemma's number.




If lemma no 1 is written on page no 1, then it is proved. Let's assume lemma nr 1 is written on page nr k, k>1. Then in at least one page there must be 2 lemmas. Let's assume that always in page k+i we have the lemma nr i+1 and so on. Then the last 100-k-i lemmas must fit in the last page, which means that there will be at least one lemma (number 100) in page 100.
But I don't know how to express it in a more mathematical way!



Any help?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
    – Chickenmancer
    13 hours ago






  • 5




    @Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
    – Oldboy
    12 hours ago










  • I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
    – paul garrett
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
    – Servaes
    7 hours ago















up vote
12
down vote

favorite
2













A book consists of 100 pages and contains 100 lemmas and some images. Each lemma is at most one page long and can't be split into two pages (it has to fit in one page). The lemmas are numbered from 1 to 100 and are written in ascending order. Prove that there must be at least one lemma written on a page with the same number as the lemma's number.




If lemma no 1 is written on page no 1, then it is proved. Let's assume lemma nr 1 is written on page nr k, k>1. Then in at least one page there must be 2 lemmas. Let's assume that always in page k+i we have the lemma nr i+1 and so on. Then the last 100-k-i lemmas must fit in the last page, which means that there will be at least one lemma (number 100) in page 100.
But I don't know how to express it in a more mathematical way!



Any help?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
    – Chickenmancer
    13 hours ago






  • 5




    @Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
    – Oldboy
    12 hours ago










  • I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
    – paul garrett
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
    – Servaes
    7 hours ago













up vote
12
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
12
down vote

favorite
2






2






A book consists of 100 pages and contains 100 lemmas and some images. Each lemma is at most one page long and can't be split into two pages (it has to fit in one page). The lemmas are numbered from 1 to 100 and are written in ascending order. Prove that there must be at least one lemma written on a page with the same number as the lemma's number.




If lemma no 1 is written on page no 1, then it is proved. Let's assume lemma nr 1 is written on page nr k, k>1. Then in at least one page there must be 2 lemmas. Let's assume that always in page k+i we have the lemma nr i+1 and so on. Then the last 100-k-i lemmas must fit in the last page, which means that there will be at least one lemma (number 100) in page 100.
But I don't know how to express it in a more mathematical way!



Any help?










share|cite|improve this question
















A book consists of 100 pages and contains 100 lemmas and some images. Each lemma is at most one page long and can't be split into two pages (it has to fit in one page). The lemmas are numbered from 1 to 100 and are written in ascending order. Prove that there must be at least one lemma written on a page with the same number as the lemma's number.




If lemma no 1 is written on page no 1, then it is proved. Let's assume lemma nr 1 is written on page nr k, k>1. Then in at least one page there must be 2 lemmas. Let's assume that always in page k+i we have the lemma nr i+1 and so on. Then the last 100-k-i lemmas must fit in the last page, which means that there will be at least one lemma (number 100) in page 100.
But I don't know how to express it in a more mathematical way!



Any help?







combinatorics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









paul garrett

31.3k361117




31.3k361117










asked 13 hours ago









Reyansh Laghari

1365




1365








  • 1




    Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
    – Chickenmancer
    13 hours ago






  • 5




    @Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
    – Oldboy
    12 hours ago










  • I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
    – paul garrett
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
    – Servaes
    7 hours ago














  • 1




    Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
    – Chickenmancer
    13 hours ago






  • 5




    @Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
    – Oldboy
    12 hours ago










  • I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
    – paul garrett
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
    – Servaes
    7 hours ago








1




1




Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
– Chickenmancer
13 hours ago




Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
– Chickenmancer
13 hours ago




5




5




@Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
– Oldboy
12 hours ago




@Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
– Oldboy
12 hours ago












I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
– paul garrett
7 hours ago




I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
– paul garrett
7 hours ago




1




1




Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
– Servaes
7 hours ago




Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
– Servaes
7 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote













For each page $i$ assign a number $p(i)$ that defines the highest number of lemma printed on all pages starting from page 1 up to page $i$ (inclusive). So if we have lemmas 3, 4 and 5 printed on page 12, with page 13 having images only: $p(12)=p(13)=5$.



We have the following sequence:



$$p(1), p(2), dots, p(100)=100tag{1}$$



If $p(1)ge1$ it means that lemma 1 is printed on the first page and we are done.



Let us consider a case when $p(1)=0$ (which basically means that the first page is reserved for images only).



The sequence of page numbers $i$ is strictly increasing and the sequence of values $p(i)$ is non-decreasing. Both sequencies have the same number of items (100), with $p(1)<1$ and $p(100)=100$.



Because of that we must have a pair of consecutive pages $i,space j=i+1$ such that:



$$p(i)<i$$



$$p(j)ge j$$



This basically means that lemma $j$ is not printed on page $i$ or on any other page before it. It is actually printed on page $j$ and this completes the proof.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • +1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
    – Ethan Bolker
    9 hours ago


















up vote
5
down vote













We claim more generally that a book of $n$ pages and $n$ lemmas numbered $1$ through $n$ has at least one lemma on a page matching its number.



Proof by induction on $n$: The case $n=1$ is obvious. Now suppose the statement is true for some $n$, and suppose we have a book of $n+1$ lemmas and $n+1$ pages. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ must be on pages $1$ through $n$, and there must be at least one lemma on a same-numbered page by the inductive hypothesis. If not, then lemma $n+1$ is on page $n+1$, and we're done.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • +1 The way to go!
    – Servaes
    7 hours ago


















up vote
4
down vote













Slight rephrasing of Oldboy's argument:



Let $a_i = i - p_i$, where $p_i$ is the page number of lemma $i$.



Then $a_1 leq 0$, $a_{100} geq 0$, and $a_{i+1}-a_{i} leq 1$. Thus $a_i$ must be $0$ for some $i$.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1




    I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
    – user113102
    8 hours ago


















up vote
2
down vote













Consider the path of points $(L, p(L))$ where lemma $L$ is on page $p(L)$. Plot that path on the grid of lattice points $(x,y)$ for $1 le x, y le 100$. The path starts on or above the diagonal at point $(1, p(1))$ and ends on or below the diagonal at point $(100, p(100))$.



Following that path, you move to the right one step at a time as the lemma count increases. You may stay at the same horizontal level since many lemmas can appear on a page. Vertical steps can be longer, if pages of images intervene. Since you start out above the diagonal, you can't cross it for the first time on a vertical step. Since in order to end up on the other side of the diagonal you must cross it once, that must be a horizontal step, so you have landed on it on the way to the other side.



(This doesn't exactly answer your question, which calls "exressing [your proof] in a more mathematical way". I might be wrong, but I don't think that's possible.)






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 2




    "since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
    – Oldboy
    12 hours ago










  • I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
    – Reyansh Laghari
    12 hours ago










  • @ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
    – Ethan Bolker
    12 hours ago






  • 1




    @Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
    – Ethan Bolker
    11 hours ago










  • It’s ok now, +1.
    – Oldboy
    1 hour ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016149%2fbook-of-lemmas-propositions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
5
down vote













For each page $i$ assign a number $p(i)$ that defines the highest number of lemma printed on all pages starting from page 1 up to page $i$ (inclusive). So if we have lemmas 3, 4 and 5 printed on page 12, with page 13 having images only: $p(12)=p(13)=5$.



We have the following sequence:



$$p(1), p(2), dots, p(100)=100tag{1}$$



If $p(1)ge1$ it means that lemma 1 is printed on the first page and we are done.



Let us consider a case when $p(1)=0$ (which basically means that the first page is reserved for images only).



The sequence of page numbers $i$ is strictly increasing and the sequence of values $p(i)$ is non-decreasing. Both sequencies have the same number of items (100), with $p(1)<1$ and $p(100)=100$.



Because of that we must have a pair of consecutive pages $i,space j=i+1$ such that:



$$p(i)<i$$



$$p(j)ge j$$



This basically means that lemma $j$ is not printed on page $i$ or on any other page before it. It is actually printed on page $j$ and this completes the proof.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • +1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
    – Ethan Bolker
    9 hours ago















up vote
5
down vote













For each page $i$ assign a number $p(i)$ that defines the highest number of lemma printed on all pages starting from page 1 up to page $i$ (inclusive). So if we have lemmas 3, 4 and 5 printed on page 12, with page 13 having images only: $p(12)=p(13)=5$.



We have the following sequence:



$$p(1), p(2), dots, p(100)=100tag{1}$$



If $p(1)ge1$ it means that lemma 1 is printed on the first page and we are done.



Let us consider a case when $p(1)=0$ (which basically means that the first page is reserved for images only).



The sequence of page numbers $i$ is strictly increasing and the sequence of values $p(i)$ is non-decreasing. Both sequencies have the same number of items (100), with $p(1)<1$ and $p(100)=100$.



Because of that we must have a pair of consecutive pages $i,space j=i+1$ such that:



$$p(i)<i$$



$$p(j)ge j$$



This basically means that lemma $j$ is not printed on page $i$ or on any other page before it. It is actually printed on page $j$ and this completes the proof.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • +1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
    – Ethan Bolker
    9 hours ago













up vote
5
down vote










up vote
5
down vote









For each page $i$ assign a number $p(i)$ that defines the highest number of lemma printed on all pages starting from page 1 up to page $i$ (inclusive). So if we have lemmas 3, 4 and 5 printed on page 12, with page 13 having images only: $p(12)=p(13)=5$.



We have the following sequence:



$$p(1), p(2), dots, p(100)=100tag{1}$$



If $p(1)ge1$ it means that lemma 1 is printed on the first page and we are done.



Let us consider a case when $p(1)=0$ (which basically means that the first page is reserved for images only).



The sequence of page numbers $i$ is strictly increasing and the sequence of values $p(i)$ is non-decreasing. Both sequencies have the same number of items (100), with $p(1)<1$ and $p(100)=100$.



Because of that we must have a pair of consecutive pages $i,space j=i+1$ such that:



$$p(i)<i$$



$$p(j)ge j$$



This basically means that lemma $j$ is not printed on page $i$ or on any other page before it. It is actually printed on page $j$ and this completes the proof.






share|cite|improve this answer














For each page $i$ assign a number $p(i)$ that defines the highest number of lemma printed on all pages starting from page 1 up to page $i$ (inclusive). So if we have lemmas 3, 4 and 5 printed on page 12, with page 13 having images only: $p(12)=p(13)=5$.



We have the following sequence:



$$p(1), p(2), dots, p(100)=100tag{1}$$



If $p(1)ge1$ it means that lemma 1 is printed on the first page and we are done.



Let us consider a case when $p(1)=0$ (which basically means that the first page is reserved for images only).



The sequence of page numbers $i$ is strictly increasing and the sequence of values $p(i)$ is non-decreasing. Both sequencies have the same number of items (100), with $p(1)<1$ and $p(100)=100$.



Because of that we must have a pair of consecutive pages $i,space j=i+1$ such that:



$$p(i)<i$$



$$p(j)ge j$$



This basically means that lemma $j$ is not printed on page $i$ or on any other page before it. It is actually printed on page $j$ and this completes the proof.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 11 hours ago

























answered 12 hours ago









Oldboy

5,6931627




5,6931627












  • +1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
    – Ethan Bolker
    9 hours ago


















  • +1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
    – Ethan Bolker
    9 hours ago
















+1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
– Ethan Bolker
9 hours ago




+1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
– Ethan Bolker
9 hours ago










up vote
5
down vote













We claim more generally that a book of $n$ pages and $n$ lemmas numbered $1$ through $n$ has at least one lemma on a page matching its number.



Proof by induction on $n$: The case $n=1$ is obvious. Now suppose the statement is true for some $n$, and suppose we have a book of $n+1$ lemmas and $n+1$ pages. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ must be on pages $1$ through $n$, and there must be at least one lemma on a same-numbered page by the inductive hypothesis. If not, then lemma $n+1$ is on page $n+1$, and we're done.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • +1 The way to go!
    – Servaes
    7 hours ago















up vote
5
down vote













We claim more generally that a book of $n$ pages and $n$ lemmas numbered $1$ through $n$ has at least one lemma on a page matching its number.



Proof by induction on $n$: The case $n=1$ is obvious. Now suppose the statement is true for some $n$, and suppose we have a book of $n+1$ lemmas and $n+1$ pages. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ must be on pages $1$ through $n$, and there must be at least one lemma on a same-numbered page by the inductive hypothesis. If not, then lemma $n+1$ is on page $n+1$, and we're done.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • +1 The way to go!
    – Servaes
    7 hours ago













up vote
5
down vote










up vote
5
down vote









We claim more generally that a book of $n$ pages and $n$ lemmas numbered $1$ through $n$ has at least one lemma on a page matching its number.



Proof by induction on $n$: The case $n=1$ is obvious. Now suppose the statement is true for some $n$, and suppose we have a book of $n+1$ lemmas and $n+1$ pages. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ must be on pages $1$ through $n$, and there must be at least one lemma on a same-numbered page by the inductive hypothesis. If not, then lemma $n+1$ is on page $n+1$, and we're done.






share|cite|improve this answer












We claim more generally that a book of $n$ pages and $n$ lemmas numbered $1$ through $n$ has at least one lemma on a page matching its number.



Proof by induction on $n$: The case $n=1$ is obvious. Now suppose the statement is true for some $n$, and suppose we have a book of $n+1$ lemmas and $n+1$ pages. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ must be on pages $1$ through $n$, and there must be at least one lemma on a same-numbered page by the inductive hypothesis. If not, then lemma $n+1$ is on page $n+1$, and we're done.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 7 hours ago









awkward

5,64111021




5,64111021












  • +1 The way to go!
    – Servaes
    7 hours ago


















  • +1 The way to go!
    – Servaes
    7 hours ago
















+1 The way to go!
– Servaes
7 hours ago




+1 The way to go!
– Servaes
7 hours ago










up vote
4
down vote













Slight rephrasing of Oldboy's argument:



Let $a_i = i - p_i$, where $p_i$ is the page number of lemma $i$.



Then $a_1 leq 0$, $a_{100} geq 0$, and $a_{i+1}-a_{i} leq 1$. Thus $a_i$ must be $0$ for some $i$.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1




    I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
    – user113102
    8 hours ago















up vote
4
down vote













Slight rephrasing of Oldboy's argument:



Let $a_i = i - p_i$, where $p_i$ is the page number of lemma $i$.



Then $a_1 leq 0$, $a_{100} geq 0$, and $a_{i+1}-a_{i} leq 1$. Thus $a_i$ must be $0$ for some $i$.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1




    I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
    – user113102
    8 hours ago













up vote
4
down vote










up vote
4
down vote









Slight rephrasing of Oldboy's argument:



Let $a_i = i - p_i$, where $p_i$ is the page number of lemma $i$.



Then $a_1 leq 0$, $a_{100} geq 0$, and $a_{i+1}-a_{i} leq 1$. Thus $a_i$ must be $0$ for some $i$.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









Slight rephrasing of Oldboy's argument:



Let $a_i = i - p_i$, where $p_i$ is the page number of lemma $i$.



Then $a_1 leq 0$, $a_{100} geq 0$, and $a_{i+1}-a_{i} leq 1$. Thus $a_i$ must be $0$ for some $i$.







share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer






New contributor




user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 8 hours ago









user113102

411




411




New contributor




user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
    – user113102
    8 hours ago














  • 1




    I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
    – user113102
    8 hours ago








1




1




I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
– user113102
8 hours ago




I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
– user113102
8 hours ago










up vote
2
down vote













Consider the path of points $(L, p(L))$ where lemma $L$ is on page $p(L)$. Plot that path on the grid of lattice points $(x,y)$ for $1 le x, y le 100$. The path starts on or above the diagonal at point $(1, p(1))$ and ends on or below the diagonal at point $(100, p(100))$.



Following that path, you move to the right one step at a time as the lemma count increases. You may stay at the same horizontal level since many lemmas can appear on a page. Vertical steps can be longer, if pages of images intervene. Since you start out above the diagonal, you can't cross it for the first time on a vertical step. Since in order to end up on the other side of the diagonal you must cross it once, that must be a horizontal step, so you have landed on it on the way to the other side.



(This doesn't exactly answer your question, which calls "exressing [your proof] in a more mathematical way". I might be wrong, but I don't think that's possible.)






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 2




    "since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
    – Oldboy
    12 hours ago










  • I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
    – Reyansh Laghari
    12 hours ago










  • @ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
    – Ethan Bolker
    12 hours ago






  • 1




    @Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
    – Ethan Bolker
    11 hours ago










  • It’s ok now, +1.
    – Oldboy
    1 hour ago















up vote
2
down vote













Consider the path of points $(L, p(L))$ where lemma $L$ is on page $p(L)$. Plot that path on the grid of lattice points $(x,y)$ for $1 le x, y le 100$. The path starts on or above the diagonal at point $(1, p(1))$ and ends on or below the diagonal at point $(100, p(100))$.



Following that path, you move to the right one step at a time as the lemma count increases. You may stay at the same horizontal level since many lemmas can appear on a page. Vertical steps can be longer, if pages of images intervene. Since you start out above the diagonal, you can't cross it for the first time on a vertical step. Since in order to end up on the other side of the diagonal you must cross it once, that must be a horizontal step, so you have landed on it on the way to the other side.



(This doesn't exactly answer your question, which calls "exressing [your proof] in a more mathematical way". I might be wrong, but I don't think that's possible.)






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 2




    "since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
    – Oldboy
    12 hours ago










  • I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
    – Reyansh Laghari
    12 hours ago










  • @ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
    – Ethan Bolker
    12 hours ago






  • 1




    @Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
    – Ethan Bolker
    11 hours ago










  • It’s ok now, +1.
    – Oldboy
    1 hour ago













up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









Consider the path of points $(L, p(L))$ where lemma $L$ is on page $p(L)$. Plot that path on the grid of lattice points $(x,y)$ for $1 le x, y le 100$. The path starts on or above the diagonal at point $(1, p(1))$ and ends on or below the diagonal at point $(100, p(100))$.



Following that path, you move to the right one step at a time as the lemma count increases. You may stay at the same horizontal level since many lemmas can appear on a page. Vertical steps can be longer, if pages of images intervene. Since you start out above the diagonal, you can't cross it for the first time on a vertical step. Since in order to end up on the other side of the diagonal you must cross it once, that must be a horizontal step, so you have landed on it on the way to the other side.



(This doesn't exactly answer your question, which calls "exressing [your proof] in a more mathematical way". I might be wrong, but I don't think that's possible.)






share|cite|improve this answer














Consider the path of points $(L, p(L))$ where lemma $L$ is on page $p(L)$. Plot that path on the grid of lattice points $(x,y)$ for $1 le x, y le 100$. The path starts on or above the diagonal at point $(1, p(1))$ and ends on or below the diagonal at point $(100, p(100))$.



Following that path, you move to the right one step at a time as the lemma count increases. You may stay at the same horizontal level since many lemmas can appear on a page. Vertical steps can be longer, if pages of images intervene. Since you start out above the diagonal, you can't cross it for the first time on a vertical step. Since in order to end up on the other side of the diagonal you must cross it once, that must be a horizontal step, so you have landed on it on the way to the other side.



(This doesn't exactly answer your question, which calls "exressing [your proof] in a more mathematical way". I might be wrong, but I don't think that's possible.)







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 11 hours ago

























answered 12 hours ago









Ethan Bolker

39.5k543102




39.5k543102








  • 2




    "since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
    – Oldboy
    12 hours ago










  • I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
    – Reyansh Laghari
    12 hours ago










  • @ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
    – Ethan Bolker
    12 hours ago






  • 1




    @Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
    – Ethan Bolker
    11 hours ago










  • It’s ok now, +1.
    – Oldboy
    1 hour ago














  • 2




    "since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
    – Oldboy
    12 hours ago










  • I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
    – Reyansh Laghari
    12 hours ago










  • @ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
    – Ethan Bolker
    12 hours ago






  • 1




    @Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
    – Ethan Bolker
    11 hours ago










  • It’s ok now, +1.
    – Oldboy
    1 hour ago








2




2




"since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
– Oldboy
12 hours ago




"since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
– Oldboy
12 hours ago












I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
– Reyansh Laghari
12 hours ago




I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
– Reyansh Laghari
12 hours ago












@ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
– Ethan Bolker
12 hours ago




@ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
– Ethan Bolker
12 hours ago




1




1




@Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
– Ethan Bolker
11 hours ago




@Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
– Ethan Bolker
11 hours ago












It’s ok now, +1.
– Oldboy
1 hour ago




It’s ok now, +1.
– Oldboy
1 hour ago


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016149%2fbook-of-lemmas-propositions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Accessing regular linux commands in Huawei's Dopra Linux

Can't connect RFCOMM socket: Host is down

Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal Exception in Interrupt