What causes water to take spherical shape in space?











up vote
12
down vote

favorite












When water is poured out in space, why does it always take a spherical ball-like shape?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Why drops form spheres?
    – Georgy
    11 hours ago















up vote
12
down vote

favorite












When water is poured out in space, why does it always take a spherical ball-like shape?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Why drops form spheres?
    – Georgy
    11 hours ago













up vote
12
down vote

favorite









up vote
12
down vote

favorite











When water is poured out in space, why does it always take a spherical ball-like shape?










share|cite|improve this question















When water is poured out in space, why does it always take a spherical ball-like shape?







water geometry surface-tension






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Qmechanic

99.7k121781119




99.7k121781119










asked yesterday









Shivansh J

887




887








  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Why drops form spheres?
    – Georgy
    11 hours ago














  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Why drops form spheres?
    – Georgy
    11 hours ago








1




1




Possible duplicate of Why drops form spheres?
– Georgy
11 hours ago




Possible duplicate of Why drops form spheres?
– Georgy
11 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
15
down vote



accepted










Minimizing energy. If there is a small amount of water, then surface tension wants to try and minimize the surface area of it, and the minimum surface area for a given volume material is a sphere. For really large volumes of water (if you, for instance, sucked all the water out of the oceans and placed it somewhere far away in space in the standard mad-scientist way), then you also get a sphere, but for a different reason: the mass of water wants to minimize its (self-)gravitational potential energy and this is also done when it is spherical. If such a volume is in the presence of external gravitational field (for instance if it was orbiting the Earth) then it would not be completely spherical: this is one of the reasons the Moon has a slightly odd shape, for instance.



In between these two regimes -- if you had a few thousand gallons of water for instance, then although it would eventually end up spherical in the absence of other influences, this would take a very long time.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • "If such a volume is in the presence of external gravitational field (for instance if it was orbiting the Earth) then it would not be completely spherical". To be precise: it has to be orbiting for it to be non-spherical. Just being in the presence is not enough.
    – fishinear
    10 hours ago










  • @fishinear Being in presence of Earth's gravity is also enough to have an elongated shape: there is a gradient of gravitational potential. That's the same reason why we have tides on Earth: the water mass is slightly stretched by the Sun and the Moon.
    – jjmontes
    5 hours ago












  • @jjmontes My mistake, you are correct. It's because the gravitational field is non-uniform
    – fishinear
    5 hours ago










  • Could you quantify the relative strength of surface tension vs. gravity, depending on amount of water? And wouldn't the "very long time" in all cases (i.e. also when it is not so long) depend on how "excess energy" is gotten rid of?
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    2 hours ago


















up vote
34
down vote













No, it's not because of gravity. You need to take quite a lot of water in order for gravitational effects to become significant.



It's because of surface tension. Sphere is a shape which minimizes the surface for a given volume. The surface-tension-related potential energy of the water is proportional to the surface, so spherical shape minimizes the potential energy.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 13




    Fun fact: this is the same reason that bubbles are round!
    – Paul Belanger
    yesterday






  • 7




    What is your "No" in reponse to? There's nothing in the question that mentions gravity.
    – Barmar
    yesterday






  • 7




    @Barmar Originally there was (the only) tag "gravity".
    – lesnik
    yesterday






  • 2




    Ahh, didn't notice that edit. But I suspect they were thinking about the lack of gravity in space, not gravity holding the water globule together.
    – Barmar
    13 hours ago


















up vote
3
down vote













I’m sure that a chemist could give a deeper answer. Or from Wikipedia we get, the surface tension occurs because water has hydrogen bonding.





Because of its polarity, a molecule of water in the liquid or solid state can form up to four hydrogen bonds with neighboring molecules. These bonds are the cause of water's high surface tension and capillary forces.





The key are the 4 possible hydrogen bonds to other water molecules of liquid water. The water molecules are bonded to each other like a free dimensional mesh.



Heating water, the water could be sprayed out in space to small pieces of course. The hydrogen bonds are weak (compared to metallic bonds) and under the influence of heat transfer the kinetic energy of the water molecules increases and the hydrogen bonds get broken.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Surface tension is not particular to water: all liquids will form a sphere in outer space. Even magma will do that, which is why planets are spherical.
    – fishinear
    10 hours ago


















up vote
-1
down vote













Thanks for adding the the H bond piece. When H2O is discussed the H bonds need always discussed. For the previous answers... well, good stuff yes. Aside from the pragmatic human behavior implications of molecules. They don't have a choice, period.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Stephens is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "151"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f442764%2fwhat-causes-water-to-take-spherical-shape-in-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    15
    down vote



    accepted










    Minimizing energy. If there is a small amount of water, then surface tension wants to try and minimize the surface area of it, and the minimum surface area for a given volume material is a sphere. For really large volumes of water (if you, for instance, sucked all the water out of the oceans and placed it somewhere far away in space in the standard mad-scientist way), then you also get a sphere, but for a different reason: the mass of water wants to minimize its (self-)gravitational potential energy and this is also done when it is spherical. If such a volume is in the presence of external gravitational field (for instance if it was orbiting the Earth) then it would not be completely spherical: this is one of the reasons the Moon has a slightly odd shape, for instance.



    In between these two regimes -- if you had a few thousand gallons of water for instance, then although it would eventually end up spherical in the absence of other influences, this would take a very long time.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • "If such a volume is in the presence of external gravitational field (for instance if it was orbiting the Earth) then it would not be completely spherical". To be precise: it has to be orbiting for it to be non-spherical. Just being in the presence is not enough.
      – fishinear
      10 hours ago










    • @fishinear Being in presence of Earth's gravity is also enough to have an elongated shape: there is a gradient of gravitational potential. That's the same reason why we have tides on Earth: the water mass is slightly stretched by the Sun and the Moon.
      – jjmontes
      5 hours ago












    • @jjmontes My mistake, you are correct. It's because the gravitational field is non-uniform
      – fishinear
      5 hours ago










    • Could you quantify the relative strength of surface tension vs. gravity, depending on amount of water? And wouldn't the "very long time" in all cases (i.e. also when it is not so long) depend on how "excess energy" is gotten rid of?
      – Hagen von Eitzen
      2 hours ago















    up vote
    15
    down vote



    accepted










    Minimizing energy. If there is a small amount of water, then surface tension wants to try and minimize the surface area of it, and the minimum surface area for a given volume material is a sphere. For really large volumes of water (if you, for instance, sucked all the water out of the oceans and placed it somewhere far away in space in the standard mad-scientist way), then you also get a sphere, but for a different reason: the mass of water wants to minimize its (self-)gravitational potential energy and this is also done when it is spherical. If such a volume is in the presence of external gravitational field (for instance if it was orbiting the Earth) then it would not be completely spherical: this is one of the reasons the Moon has a slightly odd shape, for instance.



    In between these two regimes -- if you had a few thousand gallons of water for instance, then although it would eventually end up spherical in the absence of other influences, this would take a very long time.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • "If such a volume is in the presence of external gravitational field (for instance if it was orbiting the Earth) then it would not be completely spherical". To be precise: it has to be orbiting for it to be non-spherical. Just being in the presence is not enough.
      – fishinear
      10 hours ago










    • @fishinear Being in presence of Earth's gravity is also enough to have an elongated shape: there is a gradient of gravitational potential. That's the same reason why we have tides on Earth: the water mass is slightly stretched by the Sun and the Moon.
      – jjmontes
      5 hours ago












    • @jjmontes My mistake, you are correct. It's because the gravitational field is non-uniform
      – fishinear
      5 hours ago










    • Could you quantify the relative strength of surface tension vs. gravity, depending on amount of water? And wouldn't the "very long time" in all cases (i.e. also when it is not so long) depend on how "excess energy" is gotten rid of?
      – Hagen von Eitzen
      2 hours ago













    up vote
    15
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    15
    down vote



    accepted






    Minimizing energy. If there is a small amount of water, then surface tension wants to try and minimize the surface area of it, and the minimum surface area for a given volume material is a sphere. For really large volumes of water (if you, for instance, sucked all the water out of the oceans and placed it somewhere far away in space in the standard mad-scientist way), then you also get a sphere, but for a different reason: the mass of water wants to minimize its (self-)gravitational potential energy and this is also done when it is spherical. If such a volume is in the presence of external gravitational field (for instance if it was orbiting the Earth) then it would not be completely spherical: this is one of the reasons the Moon has a slightly odd shape, for instance.



    In between these two regimes -- if you had a few thousand gallons of water for instance, then although it would eventually end up spherical in the absence of other influences, this would take a very long time.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    Minimizing energy. If there is a small amount of water, then surface tension wants to try and minimize the surface area of it, and the minimum surface area for a given volume material is a sphere. For really large volumes of water (if you, for instance, sucked all the water out of the oceans and placed it somewhere far away in space in the standard mad-scientist way), then you also get a sphere, but for a different reason: the mass of water wants to minimize its (self-)gravitational potential energy and this is also done when it is spherical. If such a volume is in the presence of external gravitational field (for instance if it was orbiting the Earth) then it would not be completely spherical: this is one of the reasons the Moon has a slightly odd shape, for instance.



    In between these two regimes -- if you had a few thousand gallons of water for instance, then although it would eventually end up spherical in the absence of other influences, this would take a very long time.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered yesterday









    tfb

    14.5k42849




    14.5k42849












    • "If such a volume is in the presence of external gravitational field (for instance if it was orbiting the Earth) then it would not be completely spherical". To be precise: it has to be orbiting for it to be non-spherical. Just being in the presence is not enough.
      – fishinear
      10 hours ago










    • @fishinear Being in presence of Earth's gravity is also enough to have an elongated shape: there is a gradient of gravitational potential. That's the same reason why we have tides on Earth: the water mass is slightly stretched by the Sun and the Moon.
      – jjmontes
      5 hours ago












    • @jjmontes My mistake, you are correct. It's because the gravitational field is non-uniform
      – fishinear
      5 hours ago










    • Could you quantify the relative strength of surface tension vs. gravity, depending on amount of water? And wouldn't the "very long time" in all cases (i.e. also when it is not so long) depend on how "excess energy" is gotten rid of?
      – Hagen von Eitzen
      2 hours ago


















    • "If such a volume is in the presence of external gravitational field (for instance if it was orbiting the Earth) then it would not be completely spherical". To be precise: it has to be orbiting for it to be non-spherical. Just being in the presence is not enough.
      – fishinear
      10 hours ago










    • @fishinear Being in presence of Earth's gravity is also enough to have an elongated shape: there is a gradient of gravitational potential. That's the same reason why we have tides on Earth: the water mass is slightly stretched by the Sun and the Moon.
      – jjmontes
      5 hours ago












    • @jjmontes My mistake, you are correct. It's because the gravitational field is non-uniform
      – fishinear
      5 hours ago










    • Could you quantify the relative strength of surface tension vs. gravity, depending on amount of water? And wouldn't the "very long time" in all cases (i.e. also when it is not so long) depend on how "excess energy" is gotten rid of?
      – Hagen von Eitzen
      2 hours ago
















    "If such a volume is in the presence of external gravitational field (for instance if it was orbiting the Earth) then it would not be completely spherical". To be precise: it has to be orbiting for it to be non-spherical. Just being in the presence is not enough.
    – fishinear
    10 hours ago




    "If such a volume is in the presence of external gravitational field (for instance if it was orbiting the Earth) then it would not be completely spherical". To be precise: it has to be orbiting for it to be non-spherical. Just being in the presence is not enough.
    – fishinear
    10 hours ago












    @fishinear Being in presence of Earth's gravity is also enough to have an elongated shape: there is a gradient of gravitational potential. That's the same reason why we have tides on Earth: the water mass is slightly stretched by the Sun and the Moon.
    – jjmontes
    5 hours ago






    @fishinear Being in presence of Earth's gravity is also enough to have an elongated shape: there is a gradient of gravitational potential. That's the same reason why we have tides on Earth: the water mass is slightly stretched by the Sun and the Moon.
    – jjmontes
    5 hours ago














    @jjmontes My mistake, you are correct. It's because the gravitational field is non-uniform
    – fishinear
    5 hours ago




    @jjmontes My mistake, you are correct. It's because the gravitational field is non-uniform
    – fishinear
    5 hours ago












    Could you quantify the relative strength of surface tension vs. gravity, depending on amount of water? And wouldn't the "very long time" in all cases (i.e. also when it is not so long) depend on how "excess energy" is gotten rid of?
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    2 hours ago




    Could you quantify the relative strength of surface tension vs. gravity, depending on amount of water? And wouldn't the "very long time" in all cases (i.e. also when it is not so long) depend on how "excess energy" is gotten rid of?
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    2 hours ago










    up vote
    34
    down vote













    No, it's not because of gravity. You need to take quite a lot of water in order for gravitational effects to become significant.



    It's because of surface tension. Sphere is a shape which minimizes the surface for a given volume. The surface-tension-related potential energy of the water is proportional to the surface, so spherical shape minimizes the potential energy.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 13




      Fun fact: this is the same reason that bubbles are round!
      – Paul Belanger
      yesterday






    • 7




      What is your "No" in reponse to? There's nothing in the question that mentions gravity.
      – Barmar
      yesterday






    • 7




      @Barmar Originally there was (the only) tag "gravity".
      – lesnik
      yesterday






    • 2




      Ahh, didn't notice that edit. But I suspect they were thinking about the lack of gravity in space, not gravity holding the water globule together.
      – Barmar
      13 hours ago















    up vote
    34
    down vote













    No, it's not because of gravity. You need to take quite a lot of water in order for gravitational effects to become significant.



    It's because of surface tension. Sphere is a shape which minimizes the surface for a given volume. The surface-tension-related potential energy of the water is proportional to the surface, so spherical shape minimizes the potential energy.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 13




      Fun fact: this is the same reason that bubbles are round!
      – Paul Belanger
      yesterday






    • 7




      What is your "No" in reponse to? There's nothing in the question that mentions gravity.
      – Barmar
      yesterday






    • 7




      @Barmar Originally there was (the only) tag "gravity".
      – lesnik
      yesterday






    • 2




      Ahh, didn't notice that edit. But I suspect they were thinking about the lack of gravity in space, not gravity holding the water globule together.
      – Barmar
      13 hours ago













    up vote
    34
    down vote










    up vote
    34
    down vote









    No, it's not because of gravity. You need to take quite a lot of water in order for gravitational effects to become significant.



    It's because of surface tension. Sphere is a shape which minimizes the surface for a given volume. The surface-tension-related potential energy of the water is proportional to the surface, so spherical shape minimizes the potential energy.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    No, it's not because of gravity. You need to take quite a lot of water in order for gravitational effects to become significant.



    It's because of surface tension. Sphere is a shape which minimizes the surface for a given volume. The surface-tension-related potential energy of the water is proportional to the surface, so spherical shape minimizes the potential energy.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered yesterday









    lesnik

    2,0241612




    2,0241612








    • 13




      Fun fact: this is the same reason that bubbles are round!
      – Paul Belanger
      yesterday






    • 7




      What is your "No" in reponse to? There's nothing in the question that mentions gravity.
      – Barmar
      yesterday






    • 7




      @Barmar Originally there was (the only) tag "gravity".
      – lesnik
      yesterday






    • 2




      Ahh, didn't notice that edit. But I suspect they were thinking about the lack of gravity in space, not gravity holding the water globule together.
      – Barmar
      13 hours ago














    • 13




      Fun fact: this is the same reason that bubbles are round!
      – Paul Belanger
      yesterday






    • 7




      What is your "No" in reponse to? There's nothing in the question that mentions gravity.
      – Barmar
      yesterday






    • 7




      @Barmar Originally there was (the only) tag "gravity".
      – lesnik
      yesterday






    • 2




      Ahh, didn't notice that edit. But I suspect they were thinking about the lack of gravity in space, not gravity holding the water globule together.
      – Barmar
      13 hours ago








    13




    13




    Fun fact: this is the same reason that bubbles are round!
    – Paul Belanger
    yesterday




    Fun fact: this is the same reason that bubbles are round!
    – Paul Belanger
    yesterday




    7




    7




    What is your "No" in reponse to? There's nothing in the question that mentions gravity.
    – Barmar
    yesterday




    What is your "No" in reponse to? There's nothing in the question that mentions gravity.
    – Barmar
    yesterday




    7




    7




    @Barmar Originally there was (the only) tag "gravity".
    – lesnik
    yesterday




    @Barmar Originally there was (the only) tag "gravity".
    – lesnik
    yesterday




    2




    2




    Ahh, didn't notice that edit. But I suspect they were thinking about the lack of gravity in space, not gravity holding the water globule together.
    – Barmar
    13 hours ago




    Ahh, didn't notice that edit. But I suspect they were thinking about the lack of gravity in space, not gravity holding the water globule together.
    – Barmar
    13 hours ago










    up vote
    3
    down vote













    I’m sure that a chemist could give a deeper answer. Or from Wikipedia we get, the surface tension occurs because water has hydrogen bonding.





    Because of its polarity, a molecule of water in the liquid or solid state can form up to four hydrogen bonds with neighboring molecules. These bonds are the cause of water's high surface tension and capillary forces.





    The key are the 4 possible hydrogen bonds to other water molecules of liquid water. The water molecules are bonded to each other like a free dimensional mesh.



    Heating water, the water could be sprayed out in space to small pieces of course. The hydrogen bonds are weak (compared to metallic bonds) and under the influence of heat transfer the kinetic energy of the water molecules increases and the hydrogen bonds get broken.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Surface tension is not particular to water: all liquids will form a sphere in outer space. Even magma will do that, which is why planets are spherical.
      – fishinear
      10 hours ago















    up vote
    3
    down vote













    I’m sure that a chemist could give a deeper answer. Or from Wikipedia we get, the surface tension occurs because water has hydrogen bonding.





    Because of its polarity, a molecule of water in the liquid or solid state can form up to four hydrogen bonds with neighboring molecules. These bonds are the cause of water's high surface tension and capillary forces.





    The key are the 4 possible hydrogen bonds to other water molecules of liquid water. The water molecules are bonded to each other like a free dimensional mesh.



    Heating water, the water could be sprayed out in space to small pieces of course. The hydrogen bonds are weak (compared to metallic bonds) and under the influence of heat transfer the kinetic energy of the water molecules increases and the hydrogen bonds get broken.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Surface tension is not particular to water: all liquids will form a sphere in outer space. Even magma will do that, which is why planets are spherical.
      – fishinear
      10 hours ago













    up vote
    3
    down vote










    up vote
    3
    down vote









    I’m sure that a chemist could give a deeper answer. Or from Wikipedia we get, the surface tension occurs because water has hydrogen bonding.





    Because of its polarity, a molecule of water in the liquid or solid state can form up to four hydrogen bonds with neighboring molecules. These bonds are the cause of water's high surface tension and capillary forces.





    The key are the 4 possible hydrogen bonds to other water molecules of liquid water. The water molecules are bonded to each other like a free dimensional mesh.



    Heating water, the water could be sprayed out in space to small pieces of course. The hydrogen bonds are weak (compared to metallic bonds) and under the influence of heat transfer the kinetic energy of the water molecules increases and the hydrogen bonds get broken.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    I’m sure that a chemist could give a deeper answer. Or from Wikipedia we get, the surface tension occurs because water has hydrogen bonding.





    Because of its polarity, a molecule of water in the liquid or solid state can form up to four hydrogen bonds with neighboring molecules. These bonds are the cause of water's high surface tension and capillary forces.





    The key are the 4 possible hydrogen bonds to other water molecules of liquid water. The water molecules are bonded to each other like a free dimensional mesh.



    Heating water, the water could be sprayed out in space to small pieces of course. The hydrogen bonds are weak (compared to metallic bonds) and under the influence of heat transfer the kinetic energy of the water molecules increases and the hydrogen bonds get broken.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered yesterday









    HolgerFiedler

    3,85531133




    3,85531133








    • 1




      Surface tension is not particular to water: all liquids will form a sphere in outer space. Even magma will do that, which is why planets are spherical.
      – fishinear
      10 hours ago














    • 1




      Surface tension is not particular to water: all liquids will form a sphere in outer space. Even magma will do that, which is why planets are spherical.
      – fishinear
      10 hours ago








    1




    1




    Surface tension is not particular to water: all liquids will form a sphere in outer space. Even magma will do that, which is why planets are spherical.
    – fishinear
    10 hours ago




    Surface tension is not particular to water: all liquids will form a sphere in outer space. Even magma will do that, which is why planets are spherical.
    – fishinear
    10 hours ago










    up vote
    -1
    down vote













    Thanks for adding the the H bond piece. When H2O is discussed the H bonds need always discussed. For the previous answers... well, good stuff yes. Aside from the pragmatic human behavior implications of molecules. They don't have a choice, period.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Stephens is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      -1
      down vote













      Thanks for adding the the H bond piece. When H2O is discussed the H bonds need always discussed. For the previous answers... well, good stuff yes. Aside from the pragmatic human behavior implications of molecules. They don't have a choice, period.






      share|cite|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Stephens is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















        up vote
        -1
        down vote










        up vote
        -1
        down vote









        Thanks for adding the the H bond piece. When H2O is discussed the H bonds need always discussed. For the previous answers... well, good stuff yes. Aside from the pragmatic human behavior implications of molecules. They don't have a choice, period.






        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Stephens is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        Thanks for adding the the H bond piece. When H2O is discussed the H bonds need always discussed. For the previous answers... well, good stuff yes. Aside from the pragmatic human behavior implications of molecules. They don't have a choice, period.







        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Stephens is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Stephens is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 7 hours ago









        Stephens

        1




        1




        New contributor




        Stephens is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Stephens is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Stephens is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f442764%2fwhat-causes-water-to-take-spherical-shape-in-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Entries order in /etc/network/interfaces

            新発田市

            Grub takes very long (several minutes) to open Menu (in Multi-Boot-System)