Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?












3















I was thinking about writing about the Holocaust, but I am not sure if it's a good idea since I am not sure if people would feel offended if I exaggerate certain events or facts even if it makes the tragedy look more horrible. How can I go about setting my story in the midst of this event without causing too much offense (and assuming I don't want to do a lot of research first)? Are the considerations the same for other historical events?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    As an aside, I don't think you can exaggerate the Holocaust. Have you seen Schindler's list? It was toned down.

    – Galastel
    3 hours ago











  • People will feel offended. It's up to you to decide how to manage that and your reaction to it.

    – DPT
    3 hours ago






  • 3





    As a reader of historical fiction, the lack of research doesn't offend me, but it does make me think the writer has very little respect for their chosen period / event. Worse, very little respect for the people who lived the event.

    – Sara Costa
    3 hours ago











  • Asking "should I do X?" is an opinion-based question (see the "primarily opinion-based" close reason. I edited to ask how to approach writing in this period instead of just asking whether you should. Please keep this in mind for your other questions. Thanks.

    – Monica Cellio
    1 hour ago
















3















I was thinking about writing about the Holocaust, but I am not sure if it's a good idea since I am not sure if people would feel offended if I exaggerate certain events or facts even if it makes the tragedy look more horrible. How can I go about setting my story in the midst of this event without causing too much offense (and assuming I don't want to do a lot of research first)? Are the considerations the same for other historical events?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    As an aside, I don't think you can exaggerate the Holocaust. Have you seen Schindler's list? It was toned down.

    – Galastel
    3 hours ago











  • People will feel offended. It's up to you to decide how to manage that and your reaction to it.

    – DPT
    3 hours ago






  • 3





    As a reader of historical fiction, the lack of research doesn't offend me, but it does make me think the writer has very little respect for their chosen period / event. Worse, very little respect for the people who lived the event.

    – Sara Costa
    3 hours ago











  • Asking "should I do X?" is an opinion-based question (see the "primarily opinion-based" close reason. I edited to ask how to approach writing in this period instead of just asking whether you should. Please keep this in mind for your other questions. Thanks.

    – Monica Cellio
    1 hour ago














3












3








3








I was thinking about writing about the Holocaust, but I am not sure if it's a good idea since I am not sure if people would feel offended if I exaggerate certain events or facts even if it makes the tragedy look more horrible. How can I go about setting my story in the midst of this event without causing too much offense (and assuming I don't want to do a lot of research first)? Are the considerations the same for other historical events?










share|improve this question
















I was thinking about writing about the Holocaust, but I am not sure if it's a good idea since I am not sure if people would feel offended if I exaggerate certain events or facts even if it makes the tragedy look more horrible. How can I go about setting my story in the midst of this event without causing too much offense (and assuming I don't want to do a lot of research first)? Are the considerations the same for other historical events?







creative-writing historical-fiction






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Monica Cellio

15.8k23585




15.8k23585










asked 4 hours ago









repomonsterrepomonster

1,446628




1,446628








  • 1





    As an aside, I don't think you can exaggerate the Holocaust. Have you seen Schindler's list? It was toned down.

    – Galastel
    3 hours ago











  • People will feel offended. It's up to you to decide how to manage that and your reaction to it.

    – DPT
    3 hours ago






  • 3





    As a reader of historical fiction, the lack of research doesn't offend me, but it does make me think the writer has very little respect for their chosen period / event. Worse, very little respect for the people who lived the event.

    – Sara Costa
    3 hours ago











  • Asking "should I do X?" is an opinion-based question (see the "primarily opinion-based" close reason. I edited to ask how to approach writing in this period instead of just asking whether you should. Please keep this in mind for your other questions. Thanks.

    – Monica Cellio
    1 hour ago














  • 1





    As an aside, I don't think you can exaggerate the Holocaust. Have you seen Schindler's list? It was toned down.

    – Galastel
    3 hours ago











  • People will feel offended. It's up to you to decide how to manage that and your reaction to it.

    – DPT
    3 hours ago






  • 3





    As a reader of historical fiction, the lack of research doesn't offend me, but it does make me think the writer has very little respect for their chosen period / event. Worse, very little respect for the people who lived the event.

    – Sara Costa
    3 hours ago











  • Asking "should I do X?" is an opinion-based question (see the "primarily opinion-based" close reason. I edited to ask how to approach writing in this period instead of just asking whether you should. Please keep this in mind for your other questions. Thanks.

    – Monica Cellio
    1 hour ago








1




1





As an aside, I don't think you can exaggerate the Holocaust. Have you seen Schindler's list? It was toned down.

– Galastel
3 hours ago





As an aside, I don't think you can exaggerate the Holocaust. Have you seen Schindler's list? It was toned down.

– Galastel
3 hours ago













People will feel offended. It's up to you to decide how to manage that and your reaction to it.

– DPT
3 hours ago





People will feel offended. It's up to you to decide how to manage that and your reaction to it.

– DPT
3 hours ago




3




3





As a reader of historical fiction, the lack of research doesn't offend me, but it does make me think the writer has very little respect for their chosen period / event. Worse, very little respect for the people who lived the event.

– Sara Costa
3 hours ago





As a reader of historical fiction, the lack of research doesn't offend me, but it does make me think the writer has very little respect for their chosen period / event. Worse, very little respect for the people who lived the event.

– Sara Costa
3 hours ago













Asking "should I do X?" is an opinion-based question (see the "primarily opinion-based" close reason. I edited to ask how to approach writing in this period instead of just asking whether you should. Please keep this in mind for your other questions. Thanks.

– Monica Cellio
1 hour ago





Asking "should I do X?" is an opinion-based question (see the "primarily opinion-based" close reason. I edited to ask how to approach writing in this period instead of just asking whether you should. Please keep this in mind for your other questions. Thanks.

– Monica Cellio
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














In general, avoid writing about things you don't know



You are write to have misgivings about writing on a topic you haven't researched. There are a lot of risks involved in doing this. You risk offending people by accident, you risk misrepresenting real people in your work and you risk being called a lazy writer for not doing your research.



Know your topic



With most topics it is nearly impossible to write about it well if you don't know what you are talking about. To write a good story set in London you need to know what London is like. Either you have lived there and know if from experience, or you do extensive research on the culture, layout, transport, architecture and climate. To not do this would open yourself up to poor reviews where readers correct all your mistakes. The same rules apply to historical settings.



Avoid giving details that may be wrong



If you feel that this is the only setting in which your story could work, then you should do the research. If you don't want to then avoid detailing the setting anymore than necessary. It is possible to write a story with a backdrop of a historical setting without giving details of it.



Many stories use the World Wars as a backdrop for the story. The Chronicles of Narnia is set during World War II but doesn't go into detail about the war itself. (Not that I'm suggesting C.S. Lewis didn't do his research) You can do a similar thing if you focus your story on a smaller scale, focus on the characters and the narrative rather than the setting.



Add a disclaimer




This work of fiction is for entertainment purposes only. Any misrepresentation of actual events is unintentional.




This won't stop being being offended, but may prevent the backlash.





I've given some advice on how to get away with writing without research, but my reall message is: Do the research. Your writing will be better for it and you might learn a few things along the way that you would like to include.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    Do note that The Chronicles of Narnia were published 1950-56; not much research into WWII would have been needed by any adult then living in England, as CSL was. Also the inital draft dates to 1939, which may have something to do with the lack of WWII detail, but mostly WWII is a bit of background not significant to the story.

    – David Siegel
    2 hours ago











  • @DavidSiegel That was my point, it was just an example of one such work. I'm aware that he wouldn't have needed to research it.

    – linksassin
    1 hour ago



















-1














Some events are far-off historical events. The most you risk if you write about them without doing the proper research is making a fool of yourself.



Other events are still within living memory. Some of your readers might have lived the event. @SaraCosta says in the comment that not doing research is a sign that "the writer has very little respect for their chosen period / event". Well, there would be living people whom you'd be disrespecting.



One particular way in which you could show disrespect is believing yourself to be exaggerating an event, when in fact you're falling drastically short. I always have a nervous twitch watching Casablanca, when they talk of Laszlo having escaped the Concentration Camps. I think of a concentration camp, I see this (warning graphic):




enter image description here(source)




Only, of course, when Casablanca was filmed, they didn't know yet. At least, the film-makers didn't.



The issue with believing yourself to be exaggerating an event, when in fact you're falling drastically short, the way you're being disrespectful, is you're underestimating the magnitude of the event. You're underestimating how big it was, how horrifying, how inescapable. You're telling people that their experience is not as big as they know it to have been. That can strike deep.



Also, if an event is still within living memory, it isn't too hard to do the research. You can find accounts and testimonies - written, or on youtube. Because research is easy, it follows that you didn't bother to do the research - you thought it "not worthy of your time", "not sufficiently important". That is how people would see it, and this too they would find offensive.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    You make an important point here, and I think the reason you're attracting downvotes is the image. I get why you've included it, but please consider making that important point some other way. I don't want to see this important point about events of living memory be driven way down.

    – Monica Cellio
    1 hour ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "166"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43060%2fshould-we-avoid-writing-fiction-about-historical-events-without-extensive-resear%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














In general, avoid writing about things you don't know



You are write to have misgivings about writing on a topic you haven't researched. There are a lot of risks involved in doing this. You risk offending people by accident, you risk misrepresenting real people in your work and you risk being called a lazy writer for not doing your research.



Know your topic



With most topics it is nearly impossible to write about it well if you don't know what you are talking about. To write a good story set in London you need to know what London is like. Either you have lived there and know if from experience, or you do extensive research on the culture, layout, transport, architecture and climate. To not do this would open yourself up to poor reviews where readers correct all your mistakes. The same rules apply to historical settings.



Avoid giving details that may be wrong



If you feel that this is the only setting in which your story could work, then you should do the research. If you don't want to then avoid detailing the setting anymore than necessary. It is possible to write a story with a backdrop of a historical setting without giving details of it.



Many stories use the World Wars as a backdrop for the story. The Chronicles of Narnia is set during World War II but doesn't go into detail about the war itself. (Not that I'm suggesting C.S. Lewis didn't do his research) You can do a similar thing if you focus your story on a smaller scale, focus on the characters and the narrative rather than the setting.



Add a disclaimer




This work of fiction is for entertainment purposes only. Any misrepresentation of actual events is unintentional.




This won't stop being being offended, but may prevent the backlash.





I've given some advice on how to get away with writing without research, but my reall message is: Do the research. Your writing will be better for it and you might learn a few things along the way that you would like to include.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    Do note that The Chronicles of Narnia were published 1950-56; not much research into WWII would have been needed by any adult then living in England, as CSL was. Also the inital draft dates to 1939, which may have something to do with the lack of WWII detail, but mostly WWII is a bit of background not significant to the story.

    – David Siegel
    2 hours ago











  • @DavidSiegel That was my point, it was just an example of one such work. I'm aware that he wouldn't have needed to research it.

    – linksassin
    1 hour ago
















5














In general, avoid writing about things you don't know



You are write to have misgivings about writing on a topic you haven't researched. There are a lot of risks involved in doing this. You risk offending people by accident, you risk misrepresenting real people in your work and you risk being called a lazy writer for not doing your research.



Know your topic



With most topics it is nearly impossible to write about it well if you don't know what you are talking about. To write a good story set in London you need to know what London is like. Either you have lived there and know if from experience, or you do extensive research on the culture, layout, transport, architecture and climate. To not do this would open yourself up to poor reviews where readers correct all your mistakes. The same rules apply to historical settings.



Avoid giving details that may be wrong



If you feel that this is the only setting in which your story could work, then you should do the research. If you don't want to then avoid detailing the setting anymore than necessary. It is possible to write a story with a backdrop of a historical setting without giving details of it.



Many stories use the World Wars as a backdrop for the story. The Chronicles of Narnia is set during World War II but doesn't go into detail about the war itself. (Not that I'm suggesting C.S. Lewis didn't do his research) You can do a similar thing if you focus your story on a smaller scale, focus on the characters and the narrative rather than the setting.



Add a disclaimer




This work of fiction is for entertainment purposes only. Any misrepresentation of actual events is unintentional.




This won't stop being being offended, but may prevent the backlash.





I've given some advice on how to get away with writing without research, but my reall message is: Do the research. Your writing will be better for it and you might learn a few things along the way that you would like to include.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    Do note that The Chronicles of Narnia were published 1950-56; not much research into WWII would have been needed by any adult then living in England, as CSL was. Also the inital draft dates to 1939, which may have something to do with the lack of WWII detail, but mostly WWII is a bit of background not significant to the story.

    – David Siegel
    2 hours ago











  • @DavidSiegel That was my point, it was just an example of one such work. I'm aware that he wouldn't have needed to research it.

    – linksassin
    1 hour ago














5












5








5







In general, avoid writing about things you don't know



You are write to have misgivings about writing on a topic you haven't researched. There are a lot of risks involved in doing this. You risk offending people by accident, you risk misrepresenting real people in your work and you risk being called a lazy writer for not doing your research.



Know your topic



With most topics it is nearly impossible to write about it well if you don't know what you are talking about. To write a good story set in London you need to know what London is like. Either you have lived there and know if from experience, or you do extensive research on the culture, layout, transport, architecture and climate. To not do this would open yourself up to poor reviews where readers correct all your mistakes. The same rules apply to historical settings.



Avoid giving details that may be wrong



If you feel that this is the only setting in which your story could work, then you should do the research. If you don't want to then avoid detailing the setting anymore than necessary. It is possible to write a story with a backdrop of a historical setting without giving details of it.



Many stories use the World Wars as a backdrop for the story. The Chronicles of Narnia is set during World War II but doesn't go into detail about the war itself. (Not that I'm suggesting C.S. Lewis didn't do his research) You can do a similar thing if you focus your story on a smaller scale, focus on the characters and the narrative rather than the setting.



Add a disclaimer




This work of fiction is for entertainment purposes only. Any misrepresentation of actual events is unintentional.




This won't stop being being offended, but may prevent the backlash.





I've given some advice on how to get away with writing without research, but my reall message is: Do the research. Your writing will be better for it and you might learn a few things along the way that you would like to include.






share|improve this answer













In general, avoid writing about things you don't know



You are write to have misgivings about writing on a topic you haven't researched. There are a lot of risks involved in doing this. You risk offending people by accident, you risk misrepresenting real people in your work and you risk being called a lazy writer for not doing your research.



Know your topic



With most topics it is nearly impossible to write about it well if you don't know what you are talking about. To write a good story set in London you need to know what London is like. Either you have lived there and know if from experience, or you do extensive research on the culture, layout, transport, architecture and climate. To not do this would open yourself up to poor reviews where readers correct all your mistakes. The same rules apply to historical settings.



Avoid giving details that may be wrong



If you feel that this is the only setting in which your story could work, then you should do the research. If you don't want to then avoid detailing the setting anymore than necessary. It is possible to write a story with a backdrop of a historical setting without giving details of it.



Many stories use the World Wars as a backdrop for the story. The Chronicles of Narnia is set during World War II but doesn't go into detail about the war itself. (Not that I'm suggesting C.S. Lewis didn't do his research) You can do a similar thing if you focus your story on a smaller scale, focus on the characters and the narrative rather than the setting.



Add a disclaimer




This work of fiction is for entertainment purposes only. Any misrepresentation of actual events is unintentional.




This won't stop being being offended, but may prevent the backlash.





I've given some advice on how to get away with writing without research, but my reall message is: Do the research. Your writing will be better for it and you might learn a few things along the way that you would like to include.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









linksassinlinksassin

1,331622




1,331622








  • 2





    Do note that The Chronicles of Narnia were published 1950-56; not much research into WWII would have been needed by any adult then living in England, as CSL was. Also the inital draft dates to 1939, which may have something to do with the lack of WWII detail, but mostly WWII is a bit of background not significant to the story.

    – David Siegel
    2 hours ago











  • @DavidSiegel That was my point, it was just an example of one such work. I'm aware that he wouldn't have needed to research it.

    – linksassin
    1 hour ago














  • 2





    Do note that The Chronicles of Narnia were published 1950-56; not much research into WWII would have been needed by any adult then living in England, as CSL was. Also the inital draft dates to 1939, which may have something to do with the lack of WWII detail, but mostly WWII is a bit of background not significant to the story.

    – David Siegel
    2 hours ago











  • @DavidSiegel That was my point, it was just an example of one such work. I'm aware that he wouldn't have needed to research it.

    – linksassin
    1 hour ago








2




2





Do note that The Chronicles of Narnia were published 1950-56; not much research into WWII would have been needed by any adult then living in England, as CSL was. Also the inital draft dates to 1939, which may have something to do with the lack of WWII detail, but mostly WWII is a bit of background not significant to the story.

– David Siegel
2 hours ago





Do note that The Chronicles of Narnia were published 1950-56; not much research into WWII would have been needed by any adult then living in England, as CSL was. Also the inital draft dates to 1939, which may have something to do with the lack of WWII detail, but mostly WWII is a bit of background not significant to the story.

– David Siegel
2 hours ago













@DavidSiegel That was my point, it was just an example of one such work. I'm aware that he wouldn't have needed to research it.

– linksassin
1 hour ago





@DavidSiegel That was my point, it was just an example of one such work. I'm aware that he wouldn't have needed to research it.

– linksassin
1 hour ago











-1














Some events are far-off historical events. The most you risk if you write about them without doing the proper research is making a fool of yourself.



Other events are still within living memory. Some of your readers might have lived the event. @SaraCosta says in the comment that not doing research is a sign that "the writer has very little respect for their chosen period / event". Well, there would be living people whom you'd be disrespecting.



One particular way in which you could show disrespect is believing yourself to be exaggerating an event, when in fact you're falling drastically short. I always have a nervous twitch watching Casablanca, when they talk of Laszlo having escaped the Concentration Camps. I think of a concentration camp, I see this (warning graphic):




enter image description here(source)




Only, of course, when Casablanca was filmed, they didn't know yet. At least, the film-makers didn't.



The issue with believing yourself to be exaggerating an event, when in fact you're falling drastically short, the way you're being disrespectful, is you're underestimating the magnitude of the event. You're underestimating how big it was, how horrifying, how inescapable. You're telling people that their experience is not as big as they know it to have been. That can strike deep.



Also, if an event is still within living memory, it isn't too hard to do the research. You can find accounts and testimonies - written, or on youtube. Because research is easy, it follows that you didn't bother to do the research - you thought it "not worthy of your time", "not sufficiently important". That is how people would see it, and this too they would find offensive.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    You make an important point here, and I think the reason you're attracting downvotes is the image. I get why you've included it, but please consider making that important point some other way. I don't want to see this important point about events of living memory be driven way down.

    – Monica Cellio
    1 hour ago
















-1














Some events are far-off historical events. The most you risk if you write about them without doing the proper research is making a fool of yourself.



Other events are still within living memory. Some of your readers might have lived the event. @SaraCosta says in the comment that not doing research is a sign that "the writer has very little respect for their chosen period / event". Well, there would be living people whom you'd be disrespecting.



One particular way in which you could show disrespect is believing yourself to be exaggerating an event, when in fact you're falling drastically short. I always have a nervous twitch watching Casablanca, when they talk of Laszlo having escaped the Concentration Camps. I think of a concentration camp, I see this (warning graphic):




enter image description here(source)




Only, of course, when Casablanca was filmed, they didn't know yet. At least, the film-makers didn't.



The issue with believing yourself to be exaggerating an event, when in fact you're falling drastically short, the way you're being disrespectful, is you're underestimating the magnitude of the event. You're underestimating how big it was, how horrifying, how inescapable. You're telling people that their experience is not as big as they know it to have been. That can strike deep.



Also, if an event is still within living memory, it isn't too hard to do the research. You can find accounts and testimonies - written, or on youtube. Because research is easy, it follows that you didn't bother to do the research - you thought it "not worthy of your time", "not sufficiently important". That is how people would see it, and this too they would find offensive.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    You make an important point here, and I think the reason you're attracting downvotes is the image. I get why you've included it, but please consider making that important point some other way. I don't want to see this important point about events of living memory be driven way down.

    – Monica Cellio
    1 hour ago














-1












-1








-1







Some events are far-off historical events. The most you risk if you write about them without doing the proper research is making a fool of yourself.



Other events are still within living memory. Some of your readers might have lived the event. @SaraCosta says in the comment that not doing research is a sign that "the writer has very little respect for their chosen period / event". Well, there would be living people whom you'd be disrespecting.



One particular way in which you could show disrespect is believing yourself to be exaggerating an event, when in fact you're falling drastically short. I always have a nervous twitch watching Casablanca, when they talk of Laszlo having escaped the Concentration Camps. I think of a concentration camp, I see this (warning graphic):




enter image description here(source)




Only, of course, when Casablanca was filmed, they didn't know yet. At least, the film-makers didn't.



The issue with believing yourself to be exaggerating an event, when in fact you're falling drastically short, the way you're being disrespectful, is you're underestimating the magnitude of the event. You're underestimating how big it was, how horrifying, how inescapable. You're telling people that their experience is not as big as they know it to have been. That can strike deep.



Also, if an event is still within living memory, it isn't too hard to do the research. You can find accounts and testimonies - written, or on youtube. Because research is easy, it follows that you didn't bother to do the research - you thought it "not worthy of your time", "not sufficiently important". That is how people would see it, and this too they would find offensive.






share|improve this answer















Some events are far-off historical events. The most you risk if you write about them without doing the proper research is making a fool of yourself.



Other events are still within living memory. Some of your readers might have lived the event. @SaraCosta says in the comment that not doing research is a sign that "the writer has very little respect for their chosen period / event". Well, there would be living people whom you'd be disrespecting.



One particular way in which you could show disrespect is believing yourself to be exaggerating an event, when in fact you're falling drastically short. I always have a nervous twitch watching Casablanca, when they talk of Laszlo having escaped the Concentration Camps. I think of a concentration camp, I see this (warning graphic):




enter image description here(source)




Only, of course, when Casablanca was filmed, they didn't know yet. At least, the film-makers didn't.



The issue with believing yourself to be exaggerating an event, when in fact you're falling drastically short, the way you're being disrespectful, is you're underestimating the magnitude of the event. You're underestimating how big it was, how horrifying, how inescapable. You're telling people that their experience is not as big as they know it to have been. That can strike deep.



Also, if an event is still within living memory, it isn't too hard to do the research. You can find accounts and testimonies - written, or on youtube. Because research is easy, it follows that you didn't bother to do the research - you thought it "not worthy of your time", "not sufficiently important". That is how people would see it, and this too they would find offensive.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago









linksassin

1,331622




1,331622










answered 2 hours ago









GalastelGalastel

34.2k5100181




34.2k5100181








  • 1





    You make an important point here, and I think the reason you're attracting downvotes is the image. I get why you've included it, but please consider making that important point some other way. I don't want to see this important point about events of living memory be driven way down.

    – Monica Cellio
    1 hour ago














  • 1





    You make an important point here, and I think the reason you're attracting downvotes is the image. I get why you've included it, but please consider making that important point some other way. I don't want to see this important point about events of living memory be driven way down.

    – Monica Cellio
    1 hour ago








1




1





You make an important point here, and I think the reason you're attracting downvotes is the image. I get why you've included it, but please consider making that important point some other way. I don't want to see this important point about events of living memory be driven way down.

– Monica Cellio
1 hour ago





You make an important point here, and I think the reason you're attracting downvotes is the image. I get why you've included it, but please consider making that important point some other way. I don't want to see this important point about events of living memory be driven way down.

– Monica Cellio
1 hour ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43060%2fshould-we-avoid-writing-fiction-about-historical-events-without-extensive-resear%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Accessing regular linux commands in Huawei's Dopra Linux

Can't connect RFCOMM socket: Host is down

Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal Exception in Interrupt