Linux Routing Question, more specific route still using default route
1
Trying to route NNN.130.0.0 via NNN.NNN.206.254 however it appears to still be using the default gateway. What am I missing here?
root@xxxxxx ~ # route add -net NNN.130.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw NNN.NNN.206.254 eth0
root@xxxxxx ~ # route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
NNN.130.0.0 NNN.NNN.206.254 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.240.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.248.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.21.124.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.20.124.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.64.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.128.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.160.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.192.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.9.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1003 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
root@xxxxxx ~ # ip route get NNN.130.20.35
NNN.130.20.35 via NNN.NNN.192.1 dev eth0 src NNN.NNN.192.62
linux route
asked 4 hours ago
BrianBrian
91
New contributor
Brian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
1
Trying to route NNN.130.0.0 via NNN.NNN.206.254 however it appears to still be using the default gateway. What am I missing here?
root@xxxxxx ~ # route add -net NNN.130.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw NNN.NNN.206.254 eth0
root@xxxxxx ~ # route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
NNN.130.0.0 NNN.NNN.206.254 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.240.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.248.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.21.124.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.20.124.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.64.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.128.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.160.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.192.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.9.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1003 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
root@xxxxxx ~ # ip route get NNN.130.20.35
NNN.130.20.35 via NNN.NNN.192.1 dev eth0 src NNN.NNN.192.62
linux route
asked 4 hours ago
BrianBrian
91
New contributor
Brian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Are all thoseNNNexactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. SoNmight be192everywhere, andMmight be172everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.
– roaima
3 hours ago
All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.
– Brian
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
1
1
Trying to route NNN.130.0.0 via NNN.NNN.206.254 however it appears to still be using the default gateway. What am I missing here?
root@xxxxxx ~ # route add -net NNN.130.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw NNN.NNN.206.254 eth0
root@xxxxxx ~ # route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
NNN.130.0.0 NNN.NNN.206.254 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.240.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.248.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.21.124.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.20.124.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.64.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.128.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.160.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.192.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.9.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1003 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
root@xxxxxx ~ # ip route get NNN.130.20.35
NNN.130.20.35 via NNN.NNN.192.1 dev eth0 src NNN.NNN.192.62
linux route
asked 4 hours ago
BrianBrian
91
New contributor
Brian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Trying to route NNN.130.0.0 via NNN.NNN.206.254 however it appears to still be using the default gateway. What am I missing here?
root@xxxxxx ~ # route add -net NNN.130.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw NNN.NNN.206.254 eth0
root@xxxxxx ~ # route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
NNN.130.0.0 NNN.NNN.206.254 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.240.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.248.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.21.124.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.20.124.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.64.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.128.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.160.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.192.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.9.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1003 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
root@xxxxxx ~ # ip route get NNN.130.20.35
NNN.130.20.35 via NNN.NNN.192.1 dev eth0 src NNN.NNN.192.62
linux route
linux route
asked 4 hours ago
BrianBrian
91
New contributor
Brian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 4 hours ago
BrianBrian
91
New contributor
Brian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 4 hours ago
BrianBrian
91
New contributor
Brian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 4 hours ago
BrianBrian
91
asked 4 hours ago
BrianBrian
91
91
New contributor
Brian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Brian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Brian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Are all thoseNNNexactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. SoNmight be192everywhere, andMmight be172everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.
– roaima
3 hours ago
All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.
– Brian
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Are all thoseNNNexactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. SoNmight be192everywhere, andMmight be172everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.
– roaima
3 hours ago
All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.
– Brian
2 hours ago
Are all those
NNN exactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. So N might be 192 everywhere, and M might be 172 everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.– roaima
3 hours ago
Are all those
NNN exactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. So N might be 192 everywhere, and M might be 172 everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.– roaima
3 hours ago
All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.
– Brian
2 hours ago
All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.
– Brian
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
0
There is no explicit route for the address NNN.130.20.35 so it takes the default.
I wonder if you're muddling NNN.130.20.35 with the unrelated subnet NNN.130.0.0/24.
answered 1 hour ago
roaimaroaima
44.4k555119
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Brian is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f498673%2flinux-routing-question-more-specific-route-still-using-default-route%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
0
There is no explicit route for the address NNN.130.20.35 so it takes the default.
I wonder if you're muddling NNN.130.20.35 with the unrelated subnet NNN.130.0.0/24.
answered 1 hour ago
roaimaroaima
44.4k555119
add a comment |
0
There is no explicit route for the address NNN.130.20.35 so it takes the default.
I wonder if you're muddling NNN.130.20.35 with the unrelated subnet NNN.130.0.0/24.
answered 1 hour ago
roaimaroaima
44.4k555119
add a comment |
0
0
0
There is no explicit route for the address NNN.130.20.35 so it takes the default.
I wonder if you're muddling NNN.130.20.35 with the unrelated subnet NNN.130.0.0/24.
answered 1 hour ago
roaimaroaima
44.4k555119
There is no explicit route for the address NNN.130.20.35 so it takes the default.
I wonder if you're muddling NNN.130.20.35 with the unrelated subnet NNN.130.0.0/24.
answered 1 hour ago
roaimaroaima
44.4k555119
answered 1 hour ago
roaimaroaima
44.4k555119
answered 1 hour ago
roaimaroaima
44.4k555119
answered 1 hour ago
roaimaroaima
44.4k555119
44.4k555119
add a comment |
add a comment |
Brian is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Brian is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Brian is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Brian is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f498673%2flinux-routing-question-more-specific-route-still-using-default-route%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Are all those
NNNexactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. SoNmight be192everywhere, andMmight be172everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.– roaima
3 hours ago
All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.
– Brian
2 hours ago