Why is addition with a real not an elementary row operation?












2












$begingroup$


Many linear algebra courses build upon the concept of elementary row operations, and further develop on their properties and relevance.



My question is, why isn't addition by a real considered an elementary row operation and how can this be argued at the level of the beginning of the course? I know that this operation doesn't share some properties of the elementary row operations. However, linear algebra courses present elementary row operations as operations that don't change the solution set. Well, addition with a real doesn't change the solution set.






linear-algebra







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is "addition by a real"? $(a,b,c) mapsto (a + r, b+r, c+r)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Billy Rubina
    1 hour ago


















2












$begingroup$


Many linear algebra courses build upon the concept of elementary row operations, and further develop on their properties and relevance.



My question is, why isn't addition by a real considered an elementary row operation and how can this be argued at the level of the beginning of the course? I know that this operation doesn't share some properties of the elementary row operations. However, linear algebra courses present elementary row operations as operations that don't change the solution set. Well, addition with a real doesn't change the solution set.






linear-algebra







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is "addition by a real"? $(a,b,c) mapsto (a + r, b+r, c+r)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Billy Rubina
    1 hour ago
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


Many linear algebra courses build upon the concept of elementary row operations, and further develop on their properties and relevance.



My question is, why isn't addition by a real considered an elementary row operation and how can this be argued at the level of the beginning of the course? I know that this operation doesn't share some properties of the elementary row operations. However, linear algebra courses present elementary row operations as operations that don't change the solution set. Well, addition with a real doesn't change the solution set.






linear-algebra







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Many linear algebra courses build upon the concept of elementary row operations, and further develop on their properties and relevance.



My question is, why isn't addition by a real considered an elementary row operation and how can this be argued at the level of the beginning of the course? I know that this operation doesn't share some properties of the elementary row operations. However, linear algebra courses present elementary row operations as operations that don't change the solution set. Well, addition with a real doesn't change the solution set.






linear-algebra




linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









Paul92Paul92

31014




31014








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is "addition by a real"? $(a,b,c) mapsto (a + r, b+r, c+r)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Billy Rubina
    1 hour ago
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is "addition by a real"? $(a,b,c) mapsto (a + r, b+r, c+r)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Billy Rubina
    1 hour ago










1




1




$begingroup$
What is "addition by a real"? $(a,b,c) mapsto (a + r, b+r, c+r)$?
$endgroup$
– Billy Rubina
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
What is "addition by a real"? $(a,b,c) mapsto (a + r, b+r, c+r)$?
$endgroup$
– Billy Rubina
1 hour ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Take for example the augmented matrix
$$(begin{array}{cc|c} 1 & -1 & 0 end{array}).$$
This has a solution of $(x, y) = t(1, 1)$.



Add the real number $1$ to the row:
$$(begin{array}{cc|c} 2 & 0 & 1 end{array}).$$
This has a solution of $(x, y) = (1/2, 0) + t(0, 1)$, which is a completely different line of solutions.



So, adding a real does indeed change the solution set.



More generally, there are other operations that do preserve the solution set, but only three are called "elementary". The reason why we restrict ourselves to just three operations is because these three operations are sufficient to transform between any two matrices of the same dimensions with the same solution set. Every row operation that preserves solution sets is a combination of elementary row operations!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    So the point is: adding $1$ to the row is equivalent to adding $x+y$ to one side of the equation (by adding $1$ to the coefficients of $x$ and $y$), while adding $1$ to the other side.
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    1 hour ago





















0












$begingroup$

Expanding on the first part of Theo Bendit's answer: if we represent the equation $$ax+by=c$$ by the matrix row $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a & b & c end{array})$$
and add a constant $k$ to the row, the result
$$(begin{array}{cc|c} a+k & b+k & c+k end{array})$$
is equivalent to the equation



$$(a+k)x+(b+k)y=c+k.$$



Comparing with the original equation, we see we've added $k(x+y)$ to one side and $k$ to the other—producing a completely different equation.



So adding a constant isn't a valid row operation.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3087816%2fwhy-is-addition-with-a-real-not-an-elementary-row-operation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    Take for example the augmented matrix
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} 1 & -1 & 0 end{array}).$$
    This has a solution of $(x, y) = t(1, 1)$.



    Add the real number $1$ to the row:
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} 2 & 0 & 1 end{array}).$$
    This has a solution of $(x, y) = (1/2, 0) + t(0, 1)$, which is a completely different line of solutions.



    So, adding a real does indeed change the solution set.



    More generally, there are other operations that do preserve the solution set, but only three are called "elementary". The reason why we restrict ourselves to just three operations is because these three operations are sufficient to transform between any two matrices of the same dimensions with the same solution set. Every row operation that preserves solution sets is a combination of elementary row operations!






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      So the point is: adding $1$ to the row is equivalent to adding $x+y$ to one side of the equation (by adding $1$ to the coefficients of $x$ and $y$), while adding $1$ to the other side.
      $endgroup$
      – timtfj
      1 hour ago


















    6












    $begingroup$

    Take for example the augmented matrix
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} 1 & -1 & 0 end{array}).$$
    This has a solution of $(x, y) = t(1, 1)$.



    Add the real number $1$ to the row:
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} 2 & 0 & 1 end{array}).$$
    This has a solution of $(x, y) = (1/2, 0) + t(0, 1)$, which is a completely different line of solutions.



    So, adding a real does indeed change the solution set.



    More generally, there are other operations that do preserve the solution set, but only three are called "elementary". The reason why we restrict ourselves to just three operations is because these three operations are sufficient to transform between any two matrices of the same dimensions with the same solution set. Every row operation that preserves solution sets is a combination of elementary row operations!






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      So the point is: adding $1$ to the row is equivalent to adding $x+y$ to one side of the equation (by adding $1$ to the coefficients of $x$ and $y$), while adding $1$ to the other side.
      $endgroup$
      – timtfj
      1 hour ago
















    6












    6








    6





    $begingroup$

    Take for example the augmented matrix
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} 1 & -1 & 0 end{array}).$$
    This has a solution of $(x, y) = t(1, 1)$.



    Add the real number $1$ to the row:
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} 2 & 0 & 1 end{array}).$$
    This has a solution of $(x, y) = (1/2, 0) + t(0, 1)$, which is a completely different line of solutions.



    So, adding a real does indeed change the solution set.



    More generally, there are other operations that do preserve the solution set, but only three are called "elementary". The reason why we restrict ourselves to just three operations is because these three operations are sufficient to transform between any two matrices of the same dimensions with the same solution set. Every row operation that preserves solution sets is a combination of elementary row operations!






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Take for example the augmented matrix
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} 1 & -1 & 0 end{array}).$$
    This has a solution of $(x, y) = t(1, 1)$.



    Add the real number $1$ to the row:
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} 2 & 0 & 1 end{array}).$$
    This has a solution of $(x, y) = (1/2, 0) + t(0, 1)$, which is a completely different line of solutions.



    So, adding a real does indeed change the solution set.



    More generally, there are other operations that do preserve the solution set, but only three are called "elementary". The reason why we restrict ourselves to just three operations is because these three operations are sufficient to transform between any two matrices of the same dimensions with the same solution set. Every row operation that preserves solution sets is a combination of elementary row operations!







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 1 hour ago

























    answered 1 hour ago









    Theo BenditTheo Bendit

    17.4k12149




    17.4k12149












    • $begingroup$
      So the point is: adding $1$ to the row is equivalent to adding $x+y$ to one side of the equation (by adding $1$ to the coefficients of $x$ and $y$), while adding $1$ to the other side.
      $endgroup$
      – timtfj
      1 hour ago




















    • $begingroup$
      So the point is: adding $1$ to the row is equivalent to adding $x+y$ to one side of the equation (by adding $1$ to the coefficients of $x$ and $y$), while adding $1$ to the other side.
      $endgroup$
      – timtfj
      1 hour ago


















    $begingroup$
    So the point is: adding $1$ to the row is equivalent to adding $x+y$ to one side of the equation (by adding $1$ to the coefficients of $x$ and $y$), while adding $1$ to the other side.
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    1 hour ago






    $begingroup$
    So the point is: adding $1$ to the row is equivalent to adding $x+y$ to one side of the equation (by adding $1$ to the coefficients of $x$ and $y$), while adding $1$ to the other side.
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    1 hour ago













    0












    $begingroup$

    Expanding on the first part of Theo Bendit's answer: if we represent the equation $$ax+by=c$$ by the matrix row $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a & b & c end{array})$$
    and add a constant $k$ to the row, the result
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a+k & b+k & c+k end{array})$$
    is equivalent to the equation



    $$(a+k)x+(b+k)y=c+k.$$



    Comparing with the original equation, we see we've added $k(x+y)$ to one side and $k$ to the other—producing a completely different equation.



    So adding a constant isn't a valid row operation.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Expanding on the first part of Theo Bendit's answer: if we represent the equation $$ax+by=c$$ by the matrix row $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a & b & c end{array})$$
      and add a constant $k$ to the row, the result
      $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a+k & b+k & c+k end{array})$$
      is equivalent to the equation



      $$(a+k)x+(b+k)y=c+k.$$



      Comparing with the original equation, we see we've added $k(x+y)$ to one side and $k$ to the other—producing a completely different equation.



      So adding a constant isn't a valid row operation.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Expanding on the first part of Theo Bendit's answer: if we represent the equation $$ax+by=c$$ by the matrix row $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a & b & c end{array})$$
        and add a constant $k$ to the row, the result
        $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a+k & b+k & c+k end{array})$$
        is equivalent to the equation



        $$(a+k)x+(b+k)y=c+k.$$



        Comparing with the original equation, we see we've added $k(x+y)$ to one side and $k$ to the other—producing a completely different equation.



        So adding a constant isn't a valid row operation.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Expanding on the first part of Theo Bendit's answer: if we represent the equation $$ax+by=c$$ by the matrix row $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a & b & c end{array})$$
        and add a constant $k$ to the row, the result
        $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a+k & b+k & c+k end{array})$$
        is equivalent to the equation



        $$(a+k)x+(b+k)y=c+k.$$



        Comparing with the original equation, we see we've added $k(x+y)$ to one side and $k$ to the other—producing a completely different equation.



        So adding a constant isn't a valid row operation.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 39 mins ago

























        answered 47 mins ago









        timtfjtimtfj

        1,638318




        1,638318






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3087816%2fwhy-is-addition-with-a-real-not-an-elementary-row-operation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Accessing regular linux commands in Huawei's Dopra Linux

            Image
            4 Backstory: I have a Huawei HG8245 router in my house and I want to change the default username/password. I've tried following this guide but the config file always gets reset. My ISP isn't helping either so I'm looking for other ways to accomplish this. The router has telnet access so this seems like a way to change the credentials. The first shell I gain access to looks like this: WAP> Pressing "?" gives me a list of available commands which I've pasted here, the two interesting ones are "su" and "shell". I can't seem to get su access, even after logging in as root (challenge password prompt, and then nothing happens), but shell gives me a proper linux shell. WAP>shell BusyBox v1.18.4 (2017-12-26 17:06:34 CST) built-in shell (ash) Enter 'hel...
            Read more

            Can't connect RFCOMM socket: Host is down

            Image
            up vote 3 down vote favorite I have bluez 5.4.3 and I am attempting to communicate with a ble device through minicom. These two deceives (my computer and a bluno nano) are alreadt paired and this has been my method so far. #bluetoothctl # pair xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx # exit Everything is working well so far then... #sudo rfcomm connect /dev/rfcomm0 xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx 1 & [1] 3665 Can't connect RFCOMM socket: Host is down Does anyone know how to resolve this issue? Any help would be very much appreciated. bluetooth bluez share | improve this question asked Feb 9 '17 at 18:46 Brandon Knape 46 2 ...
            Read more

            Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal Exception in Interrupt

            Image
            0 Every day this error occured on my pc, kernel panic error on interrupt, what will be the problem? linux-mint share asked 6 mins ago Vinod Selvin Vinod Selvin 1 1 New contributor Vinod Selvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct. add a comment ...
            Read more