get rid of “No Caching mode page found” message during boot
during early boot, I get following error message:
[sdb] No Caching mode page found
[sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
If I understand correctly, this is actually just a harmless info message and not an actual error. sdb
is my USB disk, and it does not use caching .
The problem is, I have intentionally set kernel loglevel to 4, to get rid of these kind of useless info messages.
Why then do I still get this info message?
The reason why it's bothering me is, that it interferes with my password prompt (for decrypting my LUKS disk)
Is there a way to get rid of this message ?
kernel logs startup console
add a comment |
during early boot, I get following error message:
[sdb] No Caching mode page found
[sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
If I understand correctly, this is actually just a harmless info message and not an actual error. sdb
is my USB disk, and it does not use caching .
The problem is, I have intentionally set kernel loglevel to 4, to get rid of these kind of useless info messages.
Why then do I still get this info message?
The reason why it's bothering me is, that it interferes with my password prompt (for decrypting my LUKS disk)
Is there a way to get rid of this message ?
kernel logs startup console
Use a lower kernel parameter egloglevel=0
to tailor linux messaging levels. I think level 4 is too high to silence this specific message. Level 0 is probably too drastic, but it does get rid of ALL annoying system puke in the middle of my sweet, sweet boot screens.
– Dominic Cerisano
Jul 6 '17 at 21:49
add a comment |
during early boot, I get following error message:
[sdb] No Caching mode page found
[sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
If I understand correctly, this is actually just a harmless info message and not an actual error. sdb
is my USB disk, and it does not use caching .
The problem is, I have intentionally set kernel loglevel to 4, to get rid of these kind of useless info messages.
Why then do I still get this info message?
The reason why it's bothering me is, that it interferes with my password prompt (for decrypting my LUKS disk)
Is there a way to get rid of this message ?
kernel logs startup console
during early boot, I get following error message:
[sdb] No Caching mode page found
[sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
If I understand correctly, this is actually just a harmless info message and not an actual error. sdb
is my USB disk, and it does not use caching .
The problem is, I have intentionally set kernel loglevel to 4, to get rid of these kind of useless info messages.
Why then do I still get this info message?
The reason why it's bothering me is, that it interferes with my password prompt (for decrypting my LUKS disk)
Is there a way to get rid of this message ?
kernel logs startup console
kernel logs startup console
edited Jan 24 '16 at 21:33
Gilles
529k12810611587
529k12810611587
asked Jan 24 '16 at 0:07
Martin Vegter
7834120234
7834120234
Use a lower kernel parameter egloglevel=0
to tailor linux messaging levels. I think level 4 is too high to silence this specific message. Level 0 is probably too drastic, but it does get rid of ALL annoying system puke in the middle of my sweet, sweet boot screens.
– Dominic Cerisano
Jul 6 '17 at 21:49
add a comment |
Use a lower kernel parameter egloglevel=0
to tailor linux messaging levels. I think level 4 is too high to silence this specific message. Level 0 is probably too drastic, but it does get rid of ALL annoying system puke in the middle of my sweet, sweet boot screens.
– Dominic Cerisano
Jul 6 '17 at 21:49
Use a lower kernel parameter eg
loglevel=0
to tailor linux messaging levels. I think level 4 is too high to silence this specific message. Level 0 is probably too drastic, but it does get rid of ALL annoying system puke in the middle of my sweet, sweet boot screens.– Dominic Cerisano
Jul 6 '17 at 21:49
Use a lower kernel parameter eg
loglevel=0
to tailor linux messaging levels. I think level 4 is too high to silence this specific message. Level 0 is probably too drastic, but it does get rid of ALL annoying system puke in the middle of my sweet, sweet boot screens.– Dominic Cerisano
Jul 6 '17 at 21:49
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
Hard disks have a small amount of RAM cache to speed up write operations. The system can write a chunk of data to the disk cache without actually waiting for it to be written to the disk. This is sometimes called "write-back" mode.
If there is no cache on the disk, data is directly written to it in "write-through" mode.
The Asking for cache data failed warning usually occurs with devices such as USB flash drives, USB card readers, etc. which present themselves as SCSI devices to the system (sdX), but have no cache.
The system asks the device: "Do you have a cache?" and gets no response. So it assumes there is no cache and puts it in "write-through" mode.
You may try to go to:
/etc/modules
and on top of the modules list add the line
usb_storage
It should look something like this:
# /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time.
#
# This file contains the names of kernel modules that should be loaded
# at boot time, one per line. Lines beginning with "#" are ignored.
usb_storage
lp
This is how I solved a similar problem.
Let me know what happened.
1
I am not sure what problem this is supposed to solve. But it is not applicable to my problem. Besides, I don't use modules in my kernel.
– Martin Vegter
Feb 9 '16 at 12:31
It did not fix it
– aeid
Jul 27 '17 at 16:22
add a comment |
Yes. You can get rid of such messages by executing following command:
echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/printk
This will suppress almost all the kernel messages and will display only Emergency messages
See this link for more info
Why downvote ???
– SHW
Jan 28 '16 at 9:54
2
Probably because this will not have effect during early bootup, before any userspace takes control. Same setting will have effect by addingloglevel=0
to kernel command line from bootloader (by editing and applying bootloader configuration before next reboot). P.S. I did not down voted, just FYI.
– user140866
Jan 29 '16 at 5:16
I mean underuserspace control
is thatecho
command that does write to/proc/sys/kernel/printk
pseudofile.
– user140866
Jan 29 '16 at 5:18
OP can add above echo command in his one of initramfsfs hooks or scripts.
– SHW
Jan 29 '16 at 9:25
1
@SHW - I don't want to suppress all kernel messages. My question is explicitly "how can I get rid of this message". Besides, I stated in my original post that I am using kernel parameterloglevel=4
. I could just change that tologlevel=5
to get rid of almost all messages, but this is not what I want.
– Martin Vegter
Feb 9 '16 at 12:28
add a comment |
This is probably a warn message (maybe the driver considers it important enough to mention). You did not specify which driver your USB hard drive is using so I can't point to the source line to verify this. More info on log levels here: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/linux/kern_levels.h?id=HEAD
The easiest fix would be adding "quiet" to your kernel arguments via the bootloader, whether it's GRUB/LILO/etc.
add a comment |
Change your usb boot method while changing the usb as a bootable device use power iso tool to make your usb bootable device it'll work 100% with out fail ...
add a comment |
I had this problem with a new Arch Linux UEFI installation where I was using a UEFI Live USB to load the bootloader on the ESP
.
The solution was to fix the setup with an EFI Boot Manager.
From Windows an easy solution is easyuefi
From Linux use
efibootmgr
& set atimeout
value
If you use GRUB
& not an EFISTUB
to boot Linux you do NOT need to add any crypt
kernel commands to the efibootmgr
commands.
add a comment |
I have the exact same boot up messages on ubuntu 18.04
I have an external 1TB disk using USB port.
Both Ubuntu Desktop and Server are installed side-by-side on the external USB drive.
I have Windows 10 installed on the desktop HD. I use ESC to "BIOS choose" Ubuntu or Windows Boot Device. Then Boot Manager launches for Ubuntu or Windows UEFI choices. Then GRUB launches to choose between Desktop or Server. These boot options are fine with me.
Windows launches fast. Ubuntu choice ends up with the annoying message being displayed for a good 10-15 seconds then finally User Name.
The following efibootmgr page is vey helpful reading for both boot order and timeout options: https://linux.die.net/man/8/efibootmgr
Changing boot order does nothing for me:
-o | --bootorder XXXX,YYYY,ZZZZ
(Explicitly set BootOrder (hex))
Setting timeout with -t or -T does nothing for me:
-t | --timeout seconds
(Boot Manager timeout, in seconds.)
-T | --delete-timeout
(Delete Timeout variable.)
I continue to have the same boot message:"No Caching mode page found”. I will watch this thread. I prefer not to just supress messages that could be important.
The addition of usb_storage to /etc/modules also did not work for me.
New contributor
Please don't post an answer to ask a question about another answer. Also, please don't post images of text.
– G-Man
2 hours ago
1
This does not really answer the question. If you have a different question, you can ask it by clicking Ask Question. You can also add a bounty to draw more attention to this question once you have enough reputation. - From Review
– Jeff Schaller
2 hours ago
Sorry. I can refrain from posting images. BUT I was adding that I am having the exact same problem: get rid of “No Caching mode page found” message during boot AND I have tried all the suggestions above AND thought it would be helpful to post my results since I continue to also have the same problem as the original poster.
– dubfactor
2 hours ago
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– kemotep
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257270%2fget-rid-of-no-caching-mode-page-found-message-during-boot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Hard disks have a small amount of RAM cache to speed up write operations. The system can write a chunk of data to the disk cache without actually waiting for it to be written to the disk. This is sometimes called "write-back" mode.
If there is no cache on the disk, data is directly written to it in "write-through" mode.
The Asking for cache data failed warning usually occurs with devices such as USB flash drives, USB card readers, etc. which present themselves as SCSI devices to the system (sdX), but have no cache.
The system asks the device: "Do you have a cache?" and gets no response. So it assumes there is no cache and puts it in "write-through" mode.
You may try to go to:
/etc/modules
and on top of the modules list add the line
usb_storage
It should look something like this:
# /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time.
#
# This file contains the names of kernel modules that should be loaded
# at boot time, one per line. Lines beginning with "#" are ignored.
usb_storage
lp
This is how I solved a similar problem.
Let me know what happened.
1
I am not sure what problem this is supposed to solve. But it is not applicable to my problem. Besides, I don't use modules in my kernel.
– Martin Vegter
Feb 9 '16 at 12:31
It did not fix it
– aeid
Jul 27 '17 at 16:22
add a comment |
Hard disks have a small amount of RAM cache to speed up write operations. The system can write a chunk of data to the disk cache without actually waiting for it to be written to the disk. This is sometimes called "write-back" mode.
If there is no cache on the disk, data is directly written to it in "write-through" mode.
The Asking for cache data failed warning usually occurs with devices such as USB flash drives, USB card readers, etc. which present themselves as SCSI devices to the system (sdX), but have no cache.
The system asks the device: "Do you have a cache?" and gets no response. So it assumes there is no cache and puts it in "write-through" mode.
You may try to go to:
/etc/modules
and on top of the modules list add the line
usb_storage
It should look something like this:
# /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time.
#
# This file contains the names of kernel modules that should be loaded
# at boot time, one per line. Lines beginning with "#" are ignored.
usb_storage
lp
This is how I solved a similar problem.
Let me know what happened.
1
I am not sure what problem this is supposed to solve. But it is not applicable to my problem. Besides, I don't use modules in my kernel.
– Martin Vegter
Feb 9 '16 at 12:31
It did not fix it
– aeid
Jul 27 '17 at 16:22
add a comment |
Hard disks have a small amount of RAM cache to speed up write operations. The system can write a chunk of data to the disk cache without actually waiting for it to be written to the disk. This is sometimes called "write-back" mode.
If there is no cache on the disk, data is directly written to it in "write-through" mode.
The Asking for cache data failed warning usually occurs with devices such as USB flash drives, USB card readers, etc. which present themselves as SCSI devices to the system (sdX), but have no cache.
The system asks the device: "Do you have a cache?" and gets no response. So it assumes there is no cache and puts it in "write-through" mode.
You may try to go to:
/etc/modules
and on top of the modules list add the line
usb_storage
It should look something like this:
# /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time.
#
# This file contains the names of kernel modules that should be loaded
# at boot time, one per line. Lines beginning with "#" are ignored.
usb_storage
lp
This is how I solved a similar problem.
Let me know what happened.
Hard disks have a small amount of RAM cache to speed up write operations. The system can write a chunk of data to the disk cache without actually waiting for it to be written to the disk. This is sometimes called "write-back" mode.
If there is no cache on the disk, data is directly written to it in "write-through" mode.
The Asking for cache data failed warning usually occurs with devices such as USB flash drives, USB card readers, etc. which present themselves as SCSI devices to the system (sdX), but have no cache.
The system asks the device: "Do you have a cache?" and gets no response. So it assumes there is no cache and puts it in "write-through" mode.
You may try to go to:
/etc/modules
and on top of the modules list add the line
usb_storage
It should look something like this:
# /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time.
#
# This file contains the names of kernel modules that should be loaded
# at boot time, one per line. Lines beginning with "#" are ignored.
usb_storage
lp
This is how I solved a similar problem.
Let me know what happened.
answered Jan 29 '16 at 12:30
malyy
1,00767
1,00767
1
I am not sure what problem this is supposed to solve. But it is not applicable to my problem. Besides, I don't use modules in my kernel.
– Martin Vegter
Feb 9 '16 at 12:31
It did not fix it
– aeid
Jul 27 '17 at 16:22
add a comment |
1
I am not sure what problem this is supposed to solve. But it is not applicable to my problem. Besides, I don't use modules in my kernel.
– Martin Vegter
Feb 9 '16 at 12:31
It did not fix it
– aeid
Jul 27 '17 at 16:22
1
1
I am not sure what problem this is supposed to solve. But it is not applicable to my problem. Besides, I don't use modules in my kernel.
– Martin Vegter
Feb 9 '16 at 12:31
I am not sure what problem this is supposed to solve. But it is not applicable to my problem. Besides, I don't use modules in my kernel.
– Martin Vegter
Feb 9 '16 at 12:31
It did not fix it
– aeid
Jul 27 '17 at 16:22
It did not fix it
– aeid
Jul 27 '17 at 16:22
add a comment |
Yes. You can get rid of such messages by executing following command:
echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/printk
This will suppress almost all the kernel messages and will display only Emergency messages
See this link for more info
Why downvote ???
– SHW
Jan 28 '16 at 9:54
2
Probably because this will not have effect during early bootup, before any userspace takes control. Same setting will have effect by addingloglevel=0
to kernel command line from bootloader (by editing and applying bootloader configuration before next reboot). P.S. I did not down voted, just FYI.
– user140866
Jan 29 '16 at 5:16
I mean underuserspace control
is thatecho
command that does write to/proc/sys/kernel/printk
pseudofile.
– user140866
Jan 29 '16 at 5:18
OP can add above echo command in his one of initramfsfs hooks or scripts.
– SHW
Jan 29 '16 at 9:25
1
@SHW - I don't want to suppress all kernel messages. My question is explicitly "how can I get rid of this message". Besides, I stated in my original post that I am using kernel parameterloglevel=4
. I could just change that tologlevel=5
to get rid of almost all messages, but this is not what I want.
– Martin Vegter
Feb 9 '16 at 12:28
add a comment |
Yes. You can get rid of such messages by executing following command:
echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/printk
This will suppress almost all the kernel messages and will display only Emergency messages
See this link for more info
Why downvote ???
– SHW
Jan 28 '16 at 9:54
2
Probably because this will not have effect during early bootup, before any userspace takes control. Same setting will have effect by addingloglevel=0
to kernel command line from bootloader (by editing and applying bootloader configuration before next reboot). P.S. I did not down voted, just FYI.
– user140866
Jan 29 '16 at 5:16
I mean underuserspace control
is thatecho
command that does write to/proc/sys/kernel/printk
pseudofile.
– user140866
Jan 29 '16 at 5:18
OP can add above echo command in his one of initramfsfs hooks or scripts.
– SHW
Jan 29 '16 at 9:25
1
@SHW - I don't want to suppress all kernel messages. My question is explicitly "how can I get rid of this message". Besides, I stated in my original post that I am using kernel parameterloglevel=4
. I could just change that tologlevel=5
to get rid of almost all messages, but this is not what I want.
– Martin Vegter
Feb 9 '16 at 12:28
add a comment |
Yes. You can get rid of such messages by executing following command:
echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/printk
This will suppress almost all the kernel messages and will display only Emergency messages
See this link for more info
Yes. You can get rid of such messages by executing following command:
echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/printk
This will suppress almost all the kernel messages and will display only Emergency messages
See this link for more info
answered Jan 28 '16 at 6:38
SHW
8,02033570
8,02033570
Why downvote ???
– SHW
Jan 28 '16 at 9:54
2
Probably because this will not have effect during early bootup, before any userspace takes control. Same setting will have effect by addingloglevel=0
to kernel command line from bootloader (by editing and applying bootloader configuration before next reboot). P.S. I did not down voted, just FYI.
– user140866
Jan 29 '16 at 5:16
I mean underuserspace control
is thatecho
command that does write to/proc/sys/kernel/printk
pseudofile.
– user140866
Jan 29 '16 at 5:18
OP can add above echo command in his one of initramfsfs hooks or scripts.
– SHW
Jan 29 '16 at 9:25
1
@SHW - I don't want to suppress all kernel messages. My question is explicitly "how can I get rid of this message". Besides, I stated in my original post that I am using kernel parameterloglevel=4
. I could just change that tologlevel=5
to get rid of almost all messages, but this is not what I want.
– Martin Vegter
Feb 9 '16 at 12:28
add a comment |
Why downvote ???
– SHW
Jan 28 '16 at 9:54
2
Probably because this will not have effect during early bootup, before any userspace takes control. Same setting will have effect by addingloglevel=0
to kernel command line from bootloader (by editing and applying bootloader configuration before next reboot). P.S. I did not down voted, just FYI.
– user140866
Jan 29 '16 at 5:16
I mean underuserspace control
is thatecho
command that does write to/proc/sys/kernel/printk
pseudofile.
– user140866
Jan 29 '16 at 5:18
OP can add above echo command in his one of initramfsfs hooks or scripts.
– SHW
Jan 29 '16 at 9:25
1
@SHW - I don't want to suppress all kernel messages. My question is explicitly "how can I get rid of this message". Besides, I stated in my original post that I am using kernel parameterloglevel=4
. I could just change that tologlevel=5
to get rid of almost all messages, but this is not what I want.
– Martin Vegter
Feb 9 '16 at 12:28
Why downvote ???
– SHW
Jan 28 '16 at 9:54
Why downvote ???
– SHW
Jan 28 '16 at 9:54
2
2
Probably because this will not have effect during early bootup, before any userspace takes control. Same setting will have effect by adding
loglevel=0
to kernel command line from bootloader (by editing and applying bootloader configuration before next reboot). P.S. I did not down voted, just FYI.– user140866
Jan 29 '16 at 5:16
Probably because this will not have effect during early bootup, before any userspace takes control. Same setting will have effect by adding
loglevel=0
to kernel command line from bootloader (by editing and applying bootloader configuration before next reboot). P.S. I did not down voted, just FYI.– user140866
Jan 29 '16 at 5:16
I mean under
userspace control
is that echo
command that does write to /proc/sys/kernel/printk
pseudofile.– user140866
Jan 29 '16 at 5:18
I mean under
userspace control
is that echo
command that does write to /proc/sys/kernel/printk
pseudofile.– user140866
Jan 29 '16 at 5:18
OP can add above echo command in his one of initramfsfs hooks or scripts.
– SHW
Jan 29 '16 at 9:25
OP can add above echo command in his one of initramfsfs hooks or scripts.
– SHW
Jan 29 '16 at 9:25
1
1
@SHW - I don't want to suppress all kernel messages. My question is explicitly "how can I get rid of this message". Besides, I stated in my original post that I am using kernel parameter
loglevel=4
. I could just change that to loglevel=5
to get rid of almost all messages, but this is not what I want.– Martin Vegter
Feb 9 '16 at 12:28
@SHW - I don't want to suppress all kernel messages. My question is explicitly "how can I get rid of this message". Besides, I stated in my original post that I am using kernel parameter
loglevel=4
. I could just change that to loglevel=5
to get rid of almost all messages, but this is not what I want.– Martin Vegter
Feb 9 '16 at 12:28
add a comment |
This is probably a warn message (maybe the driver considers it important enough to mention). You did not specify which driver your USB hard drive is using so I can't point to the source line to verify this. More info on log levels here: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/linux/kern_levels.h?id=HEAD
The easiest fix would be adding "quiet" to your kernel arguments via the bootloader, whether it's GRUB/LILO/etc.
add a comment |
This is probably a warn message (maybe the driver considers it important enough to mention). You did not specify which driver your USB hard drive is using so I can't point to the source line to verify this. More info on log levels here: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/linux/kern_levels.h?id=HEAD
The easiest fix would be adding "quiet" to your kernel arguments via the bootloader, whether it's GRUB/LILO/etc.
add a comment |
This is probably a warn message (maybe the driver considers it important enough to mention). You did not specify which driver your USB hard drive is using so I can't point to the source line to verify this. More info on log levels here: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/linux/kern_levels.h?id=HEAD
The easiest fix would be adding "quiet" to your kernel arguments via the bootloader, whether it's GRUB/LILO/etc.
This is probably a warn message (maybe the driver considers it important enough to mention). You did not specify which driver your USB hard drive is using so I can't point to the source line to verify this. More info on log levels here: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/linux/kern_levels.h?id=HEAD
The easiest fix would be adding "quiet" to your kernel arguments via the bootloader, whether it's GRUB/LILO/etc.
edited Feb 1 '16 at 19:09
answered Feb 1 '16 at 19:00
vik
1276
1276
add a comment |
add a comment |
Change your usb boot method while changing the usb as a bootable device use power iso tool to make your usb bootable device it'll work 100% with out fail ...
add a comment |
Change your usb boot method while changing the usb as a bootable device use power iso tool to make your usb bootable device it'll work 100% with out fail ...
add a comment |
Change your usb boot method while changing the usb as a bootable device use power iso tool to make your usb bootable device it'll work 100% with out fail ...
Change your usb boot method while changing the usb as a bootable device use power iso tool to make your usb bootable device it'll work 100% with out fail ...
answered Apr 1 '18 at 6:09
PRAKASH
275
275
add a comment |
add a comment |
I had this problem with a new Arch Linux UEFI installation where I was using a UEFI Live USB to load the bootloader on the ESP
.
The solution was to fix the setup with an EFI Boot Manager.
From Windows an easy solution is easyuefi
From Linux use
efibootmgr
& set atimeout
value
If you use GRUB
& not an EFISTUB
to boot Linux you do NOT need to add any crypt
kernel commands to the efibootmgr
commands.
add a comment |
I had this problem with a new Arch Linux UEFI installation where I was using a UEFI Live USB to load the bootloader on the ESP
.
The solution was to fix the setup with an EFI Boot Manager.
From Windows an easy solution is easyuefi
From Linux use
efibootmgr
& set atimeout
value
If you use GRUB
& not an EFISTUB
to boot Linux you do NOT need to add any crypt
kernel commands to the efibootmgr
commands.
add a comment |
I had this problem with a new Arch Linux UEFI installation where I was using a UEFI Live USB to load the bootloader on the ESP
.
The solution was to fix the setup with an EFI Boot Manager.
From Windows an easy solution is easyuefi
From Linux use
efibootmgr
& set atimeout
value
If you use GRUB
& not an EFISTUB
to boot Linux you do NOT need to add any crypt
kernel commands to the efibootmgr
commands.
I had this problem with a new Arch Linux UEFI installation where I was using a UEFI Live USB to load the bootloader on the ESP
.
The solution was to fix the setup with an EFI Boot Manager.
From Windows an easy solution is easyuefi
From Linux use
efibootmgr
& set atimeout
value
If you use GRUB
& not an EFISTUB
to boot Linux you do NOT need to add any crypt
kernel commands to the efibootmgr
commands.
answered Jul 2 '18 at 22:01
Stuart Cardall
821610
821610
add a comment |
add a comment |
I have the exact same boot up messages on ubuntu 18.04
I have an external 1TB disk using USB port.
Both Ubuntu Desktop and Server are installed side-by-side on the external USB drive.
I have Windows 10 installed on the desktop HD. I use ESC to "BIOS choose" Ubuntu or Windows Boot Device. Then Boot Manager launches for Ubuntu or Windows UEFI choices. Then GRUB launches to choose between Desktop or Server. These boot options are fine with me.
Windows launches fast. Ubuntu choice ends up with the annoying message being displayed for a good 10-15 seconds then finally User Name.
The following efibootmgr page is vey helpful reading for both boot order and timeout options: https://linux.die.net/man/8/efibootmgr
Changing boot order does nothing for me:
-o | --bootorder XXXX,YYYY,ZZZZ
(Explicitly set BootOrder (hex))
Setting timeout with -t or -T does nothing for me:
-t | --timeout seconds
(Boot Manager timeout, in seconds.)
-T | --delete-timeout
(Delete Timeout variable.)
I continue to have the same boot message:"No Caching mode page found”. I will watch this thread. I prefer not to just supress messages that could be important.
The addition of usb_storage to /etc/modules also did not work for me.
New contributor
Please don't post an answer to ask a question about another answer. Also, please don't post images of text.
– G-Man
2 hours ago
1
This does not really answer the question. If you have a different question, you can ask it by clicking Ask Question. You can also add a bounty to draw more attention to this question once you have enough reputation. - From Review
– Jeff Schaller
2 hours ago
Sorry. I can refrain from posting images. BUT I was adding that I am having the exact same problem: get rid of “No Caching mode page found” message during boot AND I have tried all the suggestions above AND thought it would be helpful to post my results since I continue to also have the same problem as the original poster.
– dubfactor
2 hours ago
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– kemotep
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I have the exact same boot up messages on ubuntu 18.04
I have an external 1TB disk using USB port.
Both Ubuntu Desktop and Server are installed side-by-side on the external USB drive.
I have Windows 10 installed on the desktop HD. I use ESC to "BIOS choose" Ubuntu or Windows Boot Device. Then Boot Manager launches for Ubuntu or Windows UEFI choices. Then GRUB launches to choose between Desktop or Server. These boot options are fine with me.
Windows launches fast. Ubuntu choice ends up with the annoying message being displayed for a good 10-15 seconds then finally User Name.
The following efibootmgr page is vey helpful reading for both boot order and timeout options: https://linux.die.net/man/8/efibootmgr
Changing boot order does nothing for me:
-o | --bootorder XXXX,YYYY,ZZZZ
(Explicitly set BootOrder (hex))
Setting timeout with -t or -T does nothing for me:
-t | --timeout seconds
(Boot Manager timeout, in seconds.)
-T | --delete-timeout
(Delete Timeout variable.)
I continue to have the same boot message:"No Caching mode page found”. I will watch this thread. I prefer not to just supress messages that could be important.
The addition of usb_storage to /etc/modules also did not work for me.
New contributor
Please don't post an answer to ask a question about another answer. Also, please don't post images of text.
– G-Man
2 hours ago
1
This does not really answer the question. If you have a different question, you can ask it by clicking Ask Question. You can also add a bounty to draw more attention to this question once you have enough reputation. - From Review
– Jeff Schaller
2 hours ago
Sorry. I can refrain from posting images. BUT I was adding that I am having the exact same problem: get rid of “No Caching mode page found” message during boot AND I have tried all the suggestions above AND thought it would be helpful to post my results since I continue to also have the same problem as the original poster.
– dubfactor
2 hours ago
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– kemotep
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I have the exact same boot up messages on ubuntu 18.04
I have an external 1TB disk using USB port.
Both Ubuntu Desktop and Server are installed side-by-side on the external USB drive.
I have Windows 10 installed on the desktop HD. I use ESC to "BIOS choose" Ubuntu or Windows Boot Device. Then Boot Manager launches for Ubuntu or Windows UEFI choices. Then GRUB launches to choose between Desktop or Server. These boot options are fine with me.
Windows launches fast. Ubuntu choice ends up with the annoying message being displayed for a good 10-15 seconds then finally User Name.
The following efibootmgr page is vey helpful reading for both boot order and timeout options: https://linux.die.net/man/8/efibootmgr
Changing boot order does nothing for me:
-o | --bootorder XXXX,YYYY,ZZZZ
(Explicitly set BootOrder (hex))
Setting timeout with -t or -T does nothing for me:
-t | --timeout seconds
(Boot Manager timeout, in seconds.)
-T | --delete-timeout
(Delete Timeout variable.)
I continue to have the same boot message:"No Caching mode page found”. I will watch this thread. I prefer not to just supress messages that could be important.
The addition of usb_storage to /etc/modules also did not work for me.
New contributor
I have the exact same boot up messages on ubuntu 18.04
I have an external 1TB disk using USB port.
Both Ubuntu Desktop and Server are installed side-by-side on the external USB drive.
I have Windows 10 installed on the desktop HD. I use ESC to "BIOS choose" Ubuntu or Windows Boot Device. Then Boot Manager launches for Ubuntu or Windows UEFI choices. Then GRUB launches to choose between Desktop or Server. These boot options are fine with me.
Windows launches fast. Ubuntu choice ends up with the annoying message being displayed for a good 10-15 seconds then finally User Name.
The following efibootmgr page is vey helpful reading for both boot order and timeout options: https://linux.die.net/man/8/efibootmgr
Changing boot order does nothing for me:
-o | --bootorder XXXX,YYYY,ZZZZ
(Explicitly set BootOrder (hex))
Setting timeout with -t or -T does nothing for me:
-t | --timeout seconds
(Boot Manager timeout, in seconds.)
-T | --delete-timeout
(Delete Timeout variable.)
I continue to have the same boot message:"No Caching mode page found”. I will watch this thread. I prefer not to just supress messages that could be important.
The addition of usb_storage to /etc/modules also did not work for me.
New contributor
edited 2 hours ago
New contributor
answered 3 hours ago
dubfactor
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
Please don't post an answer to ask a question about another answer. Also, please don't post images of text.
– G-Man
2 hours ago
1
This does not really answer the question. If you have a different question, you can ask it by clicking Ask Question. You can also add a bounty to draw more attention to this question once you have enough reputation. - From Review
– Jeff Schaller
2 hours ago
Sorry. I can refrain from posting images. BUT I was adding that I am having the exact same problem: get rid of “No Caching mode page found” message during boot AND I have tried all the suggestions above AND thought it would be helpful to post my results since I continue to also have the same problem as the original poster.
– dubfactor
2 hours ago
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– kemotep
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Please don't post an answer to ask a question about another answer. Also, please don't post images of text.
– G-Man
2 hours ago
1
This does not really answer the question. If you have a different question, you can ask it by clicking Ask Question. You can also add a bounty to draw more attention to this question once you have enough reputation. - From Review
– Jeff Schaller
2 hours ago
Sorry. I can refrain from posting images. BUT I was adding that I am having the exact same problem: get rid of “No Caching mode page found” message during boot AND I have tried all the suggestions above AND thought it would be helpful to post my results since I continue to also have the same problem as the original poster.
– dubfactor
2 hours ago
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– kemotep
1 hour ago
Please don't post an answer to ask a question about another answer. Also, please don't post images of text.
– G-Man
2 hours ago
Please don't post an answer to ask a question about another answer. Also, please don't post images of text.
– G-Man
2 hours ago
1
1
This does not really answer the question. If you have a different question, you can ask it by clicking Ask Question. You can also add a bounty to draw more attention to this question once you have enough reputation. - From Review
– Jeff Schaller
2 hours ago
This does not really answer the question. If you have a different question, you can ask it by clicking Ask Question. You can also add a bounty to draw more attention to this question once you have enough reputation. - From Review
– Jeff Schaller
2 hours ago
Sorry. I can refrain from posting images. BUT I was adding that I am having the exact same problem: get rid of “No Caching mode page found” message during boot AND I have tried all the suggestions above AND thought it would be helpful to post my results since I continue to also have the same problem as the original poster.
– dubfactor
2 hours ago
Sorry. I can refrain from posting images. BUT I was adding that I am having the exact same problem: get rid of “No Caching mode page found” message during boot AND I have tried all the suggestions above AND thought it would be helpful to post my results since I continue to also have the same problem as the original poster.
– dubfactor
2 hours ago
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– kemotep
1 hour ago
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– kemotep
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257270%2fget-rid-of-no-caching-mode-page-found-message-during-boot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Use a lower kernel parameter eg
loglevel=0
to tailor linux messaging levels. I think level 4 is too high to silence this specific message. Level 0 is probably too drastic, but it does get rid of ALL annoying system puke in the middle of my sweet, sweet boot screens.– Dominic Cerisano
Jul 6 '17 at 21:49