Debian Stable (“wheezy”): was trying to build Python 3.4, and I ran sudo make install — am I in trouble...
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
So, I wanted to run Python 3.4.x inside a virtualenv virtual environment. I learned that the first step should be to build Python 3.4.x.
I was doing so in /usr/bin/Python3.4.x (a folder I created), where I had extracted Python3.4.x stuff. Then ran ./configure
, make
, and then did sudo make install
. As that command was doing its work, I realized that I might have messed up pretty badly by overwriting core Debian stable Python.
A simple test of running python
in terminal shows that I am still using Python 2.7.x, so it seems that I am okay, but I have no clue. Doing something like sudo make uninstall
is not an option because I don't think Python makefile comes with uninstall rules for make.
Doing something like sudo apt-get install --reinstall python
also doesn't do much, leaving me feeling like I am safe, since reinstall didn't have to overwrite any files?
In any case, I am not sure what I just did, and I am not sure what the consequences are. Could someone help me understand?
I finally understand why the instructions I was following suggest that I configure and make using /opt/some_folder prefix, but its something I omitted...and now...yeah.
debian python
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 2 days ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
So, I wanted to run Python 3.4.x inside a virtualenv virtual environment. I learned that the first step should be to build Python 3.4.x.
I was doing so in /usr/bin/Python3.4.x (a folder I created), where I had extracted Python3.4.x stuff. Then ran ./configure
, make
, and then did sudo make install
. As that command was doing its work, I realized that I might have messed up pretty badly by overwriting core Debian stable Python.
A simple test of running python
in terminal shows that I am still using Python 2.7.x, so it seems that I am okay, but I have no clue. Doing something like sudo make uninstall
is not an option because I don't think Python makefile comes with uninstall rules for make.
Doing something like sudo apt-get install --reinstall python
also doesn't do much, leaving me feeling like I am safe, since reinstall didn't have to overwrite any files?
In any case, I am not sure what I just did, and I am not sure what the consequences are. Could someone help me understand?
I finally understand why the instructions I was following suggest that I configure and make using /opt/some_folder prefix, but its something I omitted...and now...yeah.
debian python
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 2 days ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
2
A sensible approach to this would be to backport Python 3.4 from Debian testing/unstable, which is almost certainly do-able, and probably not very hard. See unix.stackexchange.com/q/112157
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 20 '14 at 22:33
Thanks @FaheemMitha -- that's a very straightforward tutorial for something I considered too complicated to bother with.
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:41
Glad to hear it. You're the first person to say that. If you have questions, need more detailed directions etc., ask.
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 20 '14 at 22:43
@FaheemMitha now that what's done is done though, could I ask you for recommendations as to what I could do next to confirm that there are no problems, etc.? I think the answer I have right now assumes that Debian Wheezy comes with Python 3.4, which is not the case?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 23:03
@FaheemMitha I was digging through the configure file for Python3.4.x and I found that the default prefix /usr/local/ (so stuff is in /usr/local/lib/python3.4 and /usr/local/bin/ etc.)...it seems like I am safe?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 23:10
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
So, I wanted to run Python 3.4.x inside a virtualenv virtual environment. I learned that the first step should be to build Python 3.4.x.
I was doing so in /usr/bin/Python3.4.x (a folder I created), where I had extracted Python3.4.x stuff. Then ran ./configure
, make
, and then did sudo make install
. As that command was doing its work, I realized that I might have messed up pretty badly by overwriting core Debian stable Python.
A simple test of running python
in terminal shows that I am still using Python 2.7.x, so it seems that I am okay, but I have no clue. Doing something like sudo make uninstall
is not an option because I don't think Python makefile comes with uninstall rules for make.
Doing something like sudo apt-get install --reinstall python
also doesn't do much, leaving me feeling like I am safe, since reinstall didn't have to overwrite any files?
In any case, I am not sure what I just did, and I am not sure what the consequences are. Could someone help me understand?
I finally understand why the instructions I was following suggest that I configure and make using /opt/some_folder prefix, but its something I omitted...and now...yeah.
debian python
So, I wanted to run Python 3.4.x inside a virtualenv virtual environment. I learned that the first step should be to build Python 3.4.x.
I was doing so in /usr/bin/Python3.4.x (a folder I created), where I had extracted Python3.4.x stuff. Then ran ./configure
, make
, and then did sudo make install
. As that command was doing its work, I realized that I might have messed up pretty badly by overwriting core Debian stable Python.
A simple test of running python
in terminal shows that I am still using Python 2.7.x, so it seems that I am okay, but I have no clue. Doing something like sudo make uninstall
is not an option because I don't think Python makefile comes with uninstall rules for make.
Doing something like sudo apt-get install --reinstall python
also doesn't do much, leaving me feeling like I am safe, since reinstall didn't have to overwrite any files?
In any case, I am not sure what I just did, and I am not sure what the consequences are. Could someone help me understand?
I finally understand why the instructions I was following suggest that I configure and make using /opt/some_folder prefix, but its something I omitted...and now...yeah.
debian python
debian python
asked Dec 20 '14 at 22:00
user89
204211
204211
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 2 days ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 2 days ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
2
A sensible approach to this would be to backport Python 3.4 from Debian testing/unstable, which is almost certainly do-able, and probably not very hard. See unix.stackexchange.com/q/112157
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 20 '14 at 22:33
Thanks @FaheemMitha -- that's a very straightforward tutorial for something I considered too complicated to bother with.
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:41
Glad to hear it. You're the first person to say that. If you have questions, need more detailed directions etc., ask.
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 20 '14 at 22:43
@FaheemMitha now that what's done is done though, could I ask you for recommendations as to what I could do next to confirm that there are no problems, etc.? I think the answer I have right now assumes that Debian Wheezy comes with Python 3.4, which is not the case?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 23:03
@FaheemMitha I was digging through the configure file for Python3.4.x and I found that the default prefix /usr/local/ (so stuff is in /usr/local/lib/python3.4 and /usr/local/bin/ etc.)...it seems like I am safe?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 23:10
|
show 1 more comment
2
A sensible approach to this would be to backport Python 3.4 from Debian testing/unstable, which is almost certainly do-able, and probably not very hard. See unix.stackexchange.com/q/112157
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 20 '14 at 22:33
Thanks @FaheemMitha -- that's a very straightforward tutorial for something I considered too complicated to bother with.
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:41
Glad to hear it. You're the first person to say that. If you have questions, need more detailed directions etc., ask.
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 20 '14 at 22:43
@FaheemMitha now that what's done is done though, could I ask you for recommendations as to what I could do next to confirm that there are no problems, etc.? I think the answer I have right now assumes that Debian Wheezy comes with Python 3.4, which is not the case?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 23:03
@FaheemMitha I was digging through the configure file for Python3.4.x and I found that the default prefix /usr/local/ (so stuff is in /usr/local/lib/python3.4 and /usr/local/bin/ etc.)...it seems like I am safe?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 23:10
2
2
A sensible approach to this would be to backport Python 3.4 from Debian testing/unstable, which is almost certainly do-able, and probably not very hard. See unix.stackexchange.com/q/112157
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 20 '14 at 22:33
A sensible approach to this would be to backport Python 3.4 from Debian testing/unstable, which is almost certainly do-able, and probably not very hard. See unix.stackexchange.com/q/112157
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 20 '14 at 22:33
Thanks @FaheemMitha -- that's a very straightforward tutorial for something I considered too complicated to bother with.
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:41
Thanks @FaheemMitha -- that's a very straightforward tutorial for something I considered too complicated to bother with.
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:41
Glad to hear it. You're the first person to say that. If you have questions, need more detailed directions etc., ask.
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 20 '14 at 22:43
Glad to hear it. You're the first person to say that. If you have questions, need more detailed directions etc., ask.
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 20 '14 at 22:43
@FaheemMitha now that what's done is done though, could I ask you for recommendations as to what I could do next to confirm that there are no problems, etc.? I think the answer I have right now assumes that Debian Wheezy comes with Python 3.4, which is not the case?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 23:03
@FaheemMitha now that what's done is done though, could I ask you for recommendations as to what I could do next to confirm that there are no problems, etc.? I think the answer I have right now assumes that Debian Wheezy comes with Python 3.4, which is not the case?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 23:03
@FaheemMitha I was digging through the configure file for Python3.4.x and I found that the default prefix /usr/local/ (so stuff is in /usr/local/lib/python3.4 and /usr/local/bin/ etc.)...it seems like I am safe?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 23:10
@FaheemMitha I was digging through the configure file for Python3.4.x and I found that the default prefix /usr/local/ (so stuff is in /usr/local/lib/python3.4 and /usr/local/bin/ etc.)...it seems like I am safe?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 23:10
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
First of all: you don't need to build python to run it in a virtualenv, you could have just used the Python3.4.2 provided by the system:
virtualenv -p /usr/bin/python3.4 /path/to/your/venv
You might be in trouble, if you overwrote the system executable and/or its libraries. One of the ways to test this, is running /usr/bin/lsb_release
and see if it still works. That is one of the utilities already based on python3 (others are still on python2.7) and it is invoked by apt-get
, so when it fails you are in trouble. Try to reinstall python3 if you can, just to make sure you overwrite any traces from your compilation and install.
It would also be good to share, where you got the incorrect information that you need to build python yourself. So people might avoid that information in case it is not corrected.
I didn't have a /usr/bin/python3.4 provided by the system, as far as I can see. That's how I got the impression that I had to build it first?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:21
Also, I get a "No LSB modules are available" when I run your test command.
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:22
@user89 that message is ok. If things are broken you get no module found. I only have Jessy installed to compare, as well as Linux Mint 17 and they both have several of the programs with python3, but maybe that is not so on Wheezy. You could trygrep -l python3 /usr/bin/*
to see any of the scripts there do use it.
– Anthon
Dec 20 '14 at 23:14
@user89 the default python in Debian is still 2.7, but there is a python3.4 available, in the python3 package. Install that, it'll work then.
– Wouter Verhelst
Jul 18 '15 at 10:59
@WouterVerhelst not really, he specified that he's using wheezy and the version available on it is 3.3, not 3.4
– To마SE
Jan 19 '16 at 11:46
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The problem of overwriting default python version is still actual.
As said in the README.rst, use sudo make altinstall
to avoid overriding the OS default version:
On Unix and Mac systems if you intend to install multiple versions of Python
using the same installation prefix (--prefix
argument to the configure
script) you must take care that your primary python executable is not
overwritten by the installation of a different version. All files and
directories installed usingmake altinstall
contain the major and minor
version and can thus live side-by-side.make install
also creates
${prefix}/bin/python3
which refers to${prefix}/bin/pythonX.Y
. If you
intend to install multiple versions using the same prefix you must decide which
version (if any) is your "primary" version. Install that version usingmake
. Install all other versions using
installmake altinstall
.
For example, if you want to install Python 2.7, 3.5, and 3.6 with 3.6 being the
primary version, you would executemake install
in your 3.6 build directory
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
First of all: you don't need to build python to run it in a virtualenv, you could have just used the Python3.4.2 provided by the system:
virtualenv -p /usr/bin/python3.4 /path/to/your/venv
You might be in trouble, if you overwrote the system executable and/or its libraries. One of the ways to test this, is running /usr/bin/lsb_release
and see if it still works. That is one of the utilities already based on python3 (others are still on python2.7) and it is invoked by apt-get
, so when it fails you are in trouble. Try to reinstall python3 if you can, just to make sure you overwrite any traces from your compilation and install.
It would also be good to share, where you got the incorrect information that you need to build python yourself. So people might avoid that information in case it is not corrected.
I didn't have a /usr/bin/python3.4 provided by the system, as far as I can see. That's how I got the impression that I had to build it first?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:21
Also, I get a "No LSB modules are available" when I run your test command.
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:22
@user89 that message is ok. If things are broken you get no module found. I only have Jessy installed to compare, as well as Linux Mint 17 and they both have several of the programs with python3, but maybe that is not so on Wheezy. You could trygrep -l python3 /usr/bin/*
to see any of the scripts there do use it.
– Anthon
Dec 20 '14 at 23:14
@user89 the default python in Debian is still 2.7, but there is a python3.4 available, in the python3 package. Install that, it'll work then.
– Wouter Verhelst
Jul 18 '15 at 10:59
@WouterVerhelst not really, he specified that he's using wheezy and the version available on it is 3.3, not 3.4
– To마SE
Jan 19 '16 at 11:46
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
First of all: you don't need to build python to run it in a virtualenv, you could have just used the Python3.4.2 provided by the system:
virtualenv -p /usr/bin/python3.4 /path/to/your/venv
You might be in trouble, if you overwrote the system executable and/or its libraries. One of the ways to test this, is running /usr/bin/lsb_release
and see if it still works. That is one of the utilities already based on python3 (others are still on python2.7) and it is invoked by apt-get
, so when it fails you are in trouble. Try to reinstall python3 if you can, just to make sure you overwrite any traces from your compilation and install.
It would also be good to share, where you got the incorrect information that you need to build python yourself. So people might avoid that information in case it is not corrected.
I didn't have a /usr/bin/python3.4 provided by the system, as far as I can see. That's how I got the impression that I had to build it first?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:21
Also, I get a "No LSB modules are available" when I run your test command.
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:22
@user89 that message is ok. If things are broken you get no module found. I only have Jessy installed to compare, as well as Linux Mint 17 and they both have several of the programs with python3, but maybe that is not so on Wheezy. You could trygrep -l python3 /usr/bin/*
to see any of the scripts there do use it.
– Anthon
Dec 20 '14 at 23:14
@user89 the default python in Debian is still 2.7, but there is a python3.4 available, in the python3 package. Install that, it'll work then.
– Wouter Verhelst
Jul 18 '15 at 10:59
@WouterVerhelst not really, he specified that he's using wheezy and the version available on it is 3.3, not 3.4
– To마SE
Jan 19 '16 at 11:46
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
First of all: you don't need to build python to run it in a virtualenv, you could have just used the Python3.4.2 provided by the system:
virtualenv -p /usr/bin/python3.4 /path/to/your/venv
You might be in trouble, if you overwrote the system executable and/or its libraries. One of the ways to test this, is running /usr/bin/lsb_release
and see if it still works. That is one of the utilities already based on python3 (others are still on python2.7) and it is invoked by apt-get
, so when it fails you are in trouble. Try to reinstall python3 if you can, just to make sure you overwrite any traces from your compilation and install.
It would also be good to share, where you got the incorrect information that you need to build python yourself. So people might avoid that information in case it is not corrected.
First of all: you don't need to build python to run it in a virtualenv, you could have just used the Python3.4.2 provided by the system:
virtualenv -p /usr/bin/python3.4 /path/to/your/venv
You might be in trouble, if you overwrote the system executable and/or its libraries. One of the ways to test this, is running /usr/bin/lsb_release
and see if it still works. That is one of the utilities already based on python3 (others are still on python2.7) and it is invoked by apt-get
, so when it fails you are in trouble. Try to reinstall python3 if you can, just to make sure you overwrite any traces from your compilation and install.
It would also be good to share, where you got the incorrect information that you need to build python yourself. So people might avoid that information in case it is not corrected.
answered Dec 20 '14 at 22:15
Anthon
60k17102163
60k17102163
I didn't have a /usr/bin/python3.4 provided by the system, as far as I can see. That's how I got the impression that I had to build it first?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:21
Also, I get a "No LSB modules are available" when I run your test command.
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:22
@user89 that message is ok. If things are broken you get no module found. I only have Jessy installed to compare, as well as Linux Mint 17 and they both have several of the programs with python3, but maybe that is not so on Wheezy. You could trygrep -l python3 /usr/bin/*
to see any of the scripts there do use it.
– Anthon
Dec 20 '14 at 23:14
@user89 the default python in Debian is still 2.7, but there is a python3.4 available, in the python3 package. Install that, it'll work then.
– Wouter Verhelst
Jul 18 '15 at 10:59
@WouterVerhelst not really, he specified that he's using wheezy and the version available on it is 3.3, not 3.4
– To마SE
Jan 19 '16 at 11:46
add a comment |
I didn't have a /usr/bin/python3.4 provided by the system, as far as I can see. That's how I got the impression that I had to build it first?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:21
Also, I get a "No LSB modules are available" when I run your test command.
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:22
@user89 that message is ok. If things are broken you get no module found. I only have Jessy installed to compare, as well as Linux Mint 17 and they both have several of the programs with python3, but maybe that is not so on Wheezy. You could trygrep -l python3 /usr/bin/*
to see any of the scripts there do use it.
– Anthon
Dec 20 '14 at 23:14
@user89 the default python in Debian is still 2.7, but there is a python3.4 available, in the python3 package. Install that, it'll work then.
– Wouter Verhelst
Jul 18 '15 at 10:59
@WouterVerhelst not really, he specified that he's using wheezy and the version available on it is 3.3, not 3.4
– To마SE
Jan 19 '16 at 11:46
I didn't have a /usr/bin/python3.4 provided by the system, as far as I can see. That's how I got the impression that I had to build it first?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:21
I didn't have a /usr/bin/python3.4 provided by the system, as far as I can see. That's how I got the impression that I had to build it first?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:21
Also, I get a "No LSB modules are available" when I run your test command.
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:22
Also, I get a "No LSB modules are available" when I run your test command.
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:22
@user89 that message is ok. If things are broken you get no module found. I only have Jessy installed to compare, as well as Linux Mint 17 and they both have several of the programs with python3, but maybe that is not so on Wheezy. You could try
grep -l python3 /usr/bin/*
to see any of the scripts there do use it.– Anthon
Dec 20 '14 at 23:14
@user89 that message is ok. If things are broken you get no module found. I only have Jessy installed to compare, as well as Linux Mint 17 and they both have several of the programs with python3, but maybe that is not so on Wheezy. You could try
grep -l python3 /usr/bin/*
to see any of the scripts there do use it.– Anthon
Dec 20 '14 at 23:14
@user89 the default python in Debian is still 2.7, but there is a python3.4 available, in the python3 package. Install that, it'll work then.
– Wouter Verhelst
Jul 18 '15 at 10:59
@user89 the default python in Debian is still 2.7, but there is a python3.4 available, in the python3 package. Install that, it'll work then.
– Wouter Verhelst
Jul 18 '15 at 10:59
@WouterVerhelst not really, he specified that he's using wheezy and the version available on it is 3.3, not 3.4
– To마SE
Jan 19 '16 at 11:46
@WouterVerhelst not really, he specified that he's using wheezy and the version available on it is 3.3, not 3.4
– To마SE
Jan 19 '16 at 11:46
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The problem of overwriting default python version is still actual.
As said in the README.rst, use sudo make altinstall
to avoid overriding the OS default version:
On Unix and Mac systems if you intend to install multiple versions of Python
using the same installation prefix (--prefix
argument to the configure
script) you must take care that your primary python executable is not
overwritten by the installation of a different version. All files and
directories installed usingmake altinstall
contain the major and minor
version and can thus live side-by-side.make install
also creates
${prefix}/bin/python3
which refers to${prefix}/bin/pythonX.Y
. If you
intend to install multiple versions using the same prefix you must decide which
version (if any) is your "primary" version. Install that version usingmake
. Install all other versions using
installmake altinstall
.
For example, if you want to install Python 2.7, 3.5, and 3.6 with 3.6 being the
primary version, you would executemake install
in your 3.6 build directory
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The problem of overwriting default python version is still actual.
As said in the README.rst, use sudo make altinstall
to avoid overriding the OS default version:
On Unix and Mac systems if you intend to install multiple versions of Python
using the same installation prefix (--prefix
argument to the configure
script) you must take care that your primary python executable is not
overwritten by the installation of a different version. All files and
directories installed usingmake altinstall
contain the major and minor
version and can thus live side-by-side.make install
also creates
${prefix}/bin/python3
which refers to${prefix}/bin/pythonX.Y
. If you
intend to install multiple versions using the same prefix you must decide which
version (if any) is your "primary" version. Install that version usingmake
. Install all other versions using
installmake altinstall
.
For example, if you want to install Python 2.7, 3.5, and 3.6 with 3.6 being the
primary version, you would executemake install
in your 3.6 build directory
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The problem of overwriting default python version is still actual.
As said in the README.rst, use sudo make altinstall
to avoid overriding the OS default version:
On Unix and Mac systems if you intend to install multiple versions of Python
using the same installation prefix (--prefix
argument to the configure
script) you must take care that your primary python executable is not
overwritten by the installation of a different version. All files and
directories installed usingmake altinstall
contain the major and minor
version and can thus live side-by-side.make install
also creates
${prefix}/bin/python3
which refers to${prefix}/bin/pythonX.Y
. If you
intend to install multiple versions using the same prefix you must decide which
version (if any) is your "primary" version. Install that version usingmake
. Install all other versions using
installmake altinstall
.
For example, if you want to install Python 2.7, 3.5, and 3.6 with 3.6 being the
primary version, you would executemake install
in your 3.6 build directory
The problem of overwriting default python version is still actual.
As said in the README.rst, use sudo make altinstall
to avoid overriding the OS default version:
On Unix and Mac systems if you intend to install multiple versions of Python
using the same installation prefix (--prefix
argument to the configure
script) you must take care that your primary python executable is not
overwritten by the installation of a different version. All files and
directories installed usingmake altinstall
contain the major and minor
version and can thus live side-by-side.make install
also creates
${prefix}/bin/python3
which refers to${prefix}/bin/pythonX.Y
. If you
intend to install multiple versions using the same prefix you must decide which
version (if any) is your "primary" version. Install that version usingmake
. Install all other versions using
installmake altinstall
.
For example, if you want to install Python 2.7, 3.5, and 3.6 with 3.6 being the
primary version, you would executemake install
in your 3.6 build directory
answered Mar 22 at 9:24
freezed
215
215
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f175196%2fdebian-stable-wheezy-was-trying-to-build-python-3-4-and-i-ran-sudo-make-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
A sensible approach to this would be to backport Python 3.4 from Debian testing/unstable, which is almost certainly do-able, and probably not very hard. See unix.stackexchange.com/q/112157
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 20 '14 at 22:33
Thanks @FaheemMitha -- that's a very straightforward tutorial for something I considered too complicated to bother with.
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 22:41
Glad to hear it. You're the first person to say that. If you have questions, need more detailed directions etc., ask.
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 20 '14 at 22:43
@FaheemMitha now that what's done is done though, could I ask you for recommendations as to what I could do next to confirm that there are no problems, etc.? I think the answer I have right now assumes that Debian Wheezy comes with Python 3.4, which is not the case?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 23:03
@FaheemMitha I was digging through the configure file for Python3.4.x and I found that the default prefix /usr/local/ (so stuff is in /usr/local/lib/python3.4 and /usr/local/bin/ etc.)...it seems like I am safe?
– user89
Dec 20 '14 at 23:10