Positioning tables and figures at the end of the respective caption list
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Sir/Madam!
My landscape tables are appearing in the body of the text whereas portrait tables are appearing at the end of the file. Please help me to remove the figures and tables from the text of my file and place them at the end of the file, after the tables and figure caption list. I am enclosing the code.
documentclass[Journal,letterpaper]{ascelike-new}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{graphicx} %Allows to import images
usepackage{float} %Allows for control of float positions
graphicspath{ {images/} }
%Tables preamble
usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
usepackage{array}
newcolumntype{$}{>{globalletcurrentrowstylerelax}}
newcolumntype{^}{>{currentrowstyle}}
newcommand{rowstyle}[1]{gdefcurrentrowstyle{#1} #1ignorespaces}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{pdflscape}
usepackage{lscape}
usepackage{rotating} % Provides {sideways}{sidewaysfigure}{sidewaystable} environments
usepackage[figurename=Fig.,labelfont=bf,labelsep=period]{caption}
usepackage{caption}
usepackage{subcaption}
captionsetup{compatibility=false}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage[colorlinks=true,citecolor=black,linkcolor=black]{hyperref}
usepackage{enumerate}% http://ctan.org/pkg/enumerate
%%Tables preamble
usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
usepackage{array}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{multirow}
usepackage{longtable}
usepackage{lipsum} % just for dummy text- not needed for a longtable
%Flowchart
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric, arrows}
NameTag{Singh, today}
begin{document}
The range of Strain transducer was +/- 4000 micro-strain, sensitivity = 500 micro-strain/Vout/Vext with accuracy < +/- 1 percent.
Based on theoretical simulation of the bridge using MATLAB, strain gages were placed at critical locations as shown in Fig. ref{fig:sensorloc}.
%begin{landscape}
%begin{figure}[p !]
begin{sidewaysfigure}
centering
includegraphics[width=columnwidth]{sensor_loc}
caption{Location of sensors}
label{fig:sensorloc}
end{sidewaysfigure}
%end{figure}
%end{landscape}
section{Observations and calculations}
The details of trains for which strains have been measured have been shown in Table ref{tab:train_run}.
begin{table}
centering
caption{Details of trains instrumented for Fatigue life estimation}
label{tab:train_run}
begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{.2in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.2in}^p{.4in}^p{1in}}
hlinehline
Date& Run No& Train details& Engine details& Time (Hrs)& Speed (Kmph) \
hline
18.06.16& 1& 59 BOXN Empty Goods& 27540WAG7& 13:03& 20 to 5 to 20 \
-do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 16225R/WDM3A& 13:35& 20 \
-do-& 3& 12369 Up Upasana Exp& 22650/WAP4& 14:18& 20 \
-do-& 4& 11448 Up Shaktipunj Exp& 22531/WAP4& 14:26& 20 \
-do-& 5& 59 BXNHS Loaded Goods& 27537/WAG7& 14:46& 20 \
19.06.16& 1& 13151 Up Jammu Tawi Exp& 22906/WAP4& 13:19& 20 \
-do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 14006R/WDM3A& 13:28& 20 \
-do-& 3& 58 BOXN Loaded Goods& 24693/WAG9& 14:00& 5 to 20 \
hlinehline
end{tabular}
end{table}
%
begin{longtable}{$p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}}
caption{Cumulative GMT of Up Howrah-Barddhaman Chord line between Saktigarh and Barddhaman}
label{tab:GMT} \
hlinehline
Year &Annual GMT&Annual GMT per line&Cum GMT\
hline
1996-97& 38& 19& 480.155\
1997-98& 41& 20.5& 500.655\
1998-99& 42& 21& 521.655\
1999-00& 42& 21& 542.655\
2000-01& 40& 20& 562.655\
2001-02& 43& 21.5& 584.155\
2002-03& 42& 21& 605.155\
2003-04& 42& 21& 626.155\
2004-05& 44& 22& 648.155\
2005-06& 47& 23.5& 671.655\
2006-07& 46& 23& 694.655\
2007-08& 50& 25& 719.655\
2008-09& 58& 29& 748.655\
2009-10& 62& 31& 779.655\
2010-11& 63& 31.5& 811.155\
2011-12& 60& 30& 841.155\
2012-13& 62& 31& 872.155\
2013-14& 63& 31.5& 903.655\
2014-15& 63& 31.5& 935.155\
2015-16& 63& 31.5& 966.655\
hlinehline
multicolumn{5}{l}{Note: Data obtained from Track Modernization Cell of Eastern Railway}
end{longtable}
Sample calculation of effective cycles for the critical member i.e. cross girder (Strain gauge no. 2289) has been furnished in Table ref{tab:SampleCalc}.
begin{table}
centering
caption{Sample calculation of effective cycles for cross girder}
label{tab:SampleCalc}
begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.5in}^p{1.5in}}
hlinehline
Stress range in N/mm2&No. of observed effective cycles from Rain flow histogram (say a)&No. of modified effective cycles (ni) = ax(68/8)x1.4)&No. of theoretical cycles (Ni) as per S-N curve x $10^6$ \
hline
0-10& 117& 1392& 3990.00 \
10-20& 91& 1083& 498.75 \
20-30& 1& 11.9& 147.78 \
30-40& 2& 23.8& 62.34 \
40-50& 2& 23.8& 31.92 \
hlinehline
end{tabular}
end{table}
From Table ref{tab:reslifeeuro3}, it is seen that stringers (after replacement) are still the critical members from fatigue considerations with residual fatigue life of 169 years.
begin{sidewaystable}
centering
caption{Calculation of residual life from Fatigue considerations using S-N curve in Eurocode 3}
label{tab:reslifeeuro3}
begin{tabular}{lllllllllllllll}
hlinehline
multirow{3}{*}{Member} & multirow{3}{*}{Strain} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Observed ni for 8 trains (5 Pass + 3 Goods)} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Equated for 68 trains (48 Pass + 20 Goods)} & {Damage} & {Total} & {Residual} \
& & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & {per} & {life} & {life} \
& Gauge & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & {Day(D)} \
hline
multirow{1}{*}{Top chord} & 2897 & 125 & 4 & 3 & 1 & & 1488 & 47.6 & 35.7 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \
Vertical & 2895 & 18 & & & & & 214.2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
multirow{1}{*}{Diagonal} & 2892 & 92 & 1 & 2 & & & 1095 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
multirow{1}{*}{End raker} & 2829 & 36 & 0 & 2 & 1 & & 428.4 & 0 & 23.8 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \
multirow{1}{*}{Bottom chord} & 2891 & 109 & 9 & & & & 1297 & 107 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
multirow{1}{*}{Cross girder} & 2889 & 117 & 91 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 1392 & 1083 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 23.8 & 2.7767 & 296 & 204 \
multirow{1}{*}{Stringers} & 2890 & 107 & 111 & 1 & 2 & 4 & 1273 & 1321 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 47.6 & 4.8681 & 169 & 167* \
hlinehline \
multicolumn{5}{l}{*Not reduced as Stringers have been recently changed.} \
multicolumn{9}{l}{Theoretical cycles below 32MPa (stress below cut-off limit) have not been considered.}
end{tabular}
end{sidewaystable}
For this kind of cycle the maximum stress is equal to the minimum stress but completely opposite in nature i.e. $sigma _m$ = 0 as shown Fig. ref{fig:revcycle}.
begin{figure}
centering
includegraphics[scale=0.8]{HCFtest}
caption{Experimental Setup of High Cycle Fatigue test}
label{fig:hcftest}
end{figure}
pagebreak
end{document}
May kindly help..
Thanking you & regards Sitesh
tables floats positioning
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Sir/Madam!
My landscape tables are appearing in the body of the text whereas portrait tables are appearing at the end of the file. Please help me to remove the figures and tables from the text of my file and place them at the end of the file, after the tables and figure caption list. I am enclosing the code.
documentclass[Journal,letterpaper]{ascelike-new}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{graphicx} %Allows to import images
usepackage{float} %Allows for control of float positions
graphicspath{ {images/} }
%Tables preamble
usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
usepackage{array}
newcolumntype{$}{>{globalletcurrentrowstylerelax}}
newcolumntype{^}{>{currentrowstyle}}
newcommand{rowstyle}[1]{gdefcurrentrowstyle{#1} #1ignorespaces}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{pdflscape}
usepackage{lscape}
usepackage{rotating} % Provides {sideways}{sidewaysfigure}{sidewaystable} environments
usepackage[figurename=Fig.,labelfont=bf,labelsep=period]{caption}
usepackage{caption}
usepackage{subcaption}
captionsetup{compatibility=false}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage[colorlinks=true,citecolor=black,linkcolor=black]{hyperref}
usepackage{enumerate}% http://ctan.org/pkg/enumerate
%%Tables preamble
usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
usepackage{array}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{multirow}
usepackage{longtable}
usepackage{lipsum} % just for dummy text- not needed for a longtable
%Flowchart
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric, arrows}
NameTag{Singh, today}
begin{document}
The range of Strain transducer was +/- 4000 micro-strain, sensitivity = 500 micro-strain/Vout/Vext with accuracy < +/- 1 percent.
Based on theoretical simulation of the bridge using MATLAB, strain gages were placed at critical locations as shown in Fig. ref{fig:sensorloc}.
%begin{landscape}
%begin{figure}[p !]
begin{sidewaysfigure}
centering
includegraphics[width=columnwidth]{sensor_loc}
caption{Location of sensors}
label{fig:sensorloc}
end{sidewaysfigure}
%end{figure}
%end{landscape}
section{Observations and calculations}
The details of trains for which strains have been measured have been shown in Table ref{tab:train_run}.
begin{table}
centering
caption{Details of trains instrumented for Fatigue life estimation}
label{tab:train_run}
begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{.2in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.2in}^p{.4in}^p{1in}}
hlinehline
Date& Run No& Train details& Engine details& Time (Hrs)& Speed (Kmph) \
hline
18.06.16& 1& 59 BOXN Empty Goods& 27540WAG7& 13:03& 20 to 5 to 20 \
-do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 16225R/WDM3A& 13:35& 20 \
-do-& 3& 12369 Up Upasana Exp& 22650/WAP4& 14:18& 20 \
-do-& 4& 11448 Up Shaktipunj Exp& 22531/WAP4& 14:26& 20 \
-do-& 5& 59 BXNHS Loaded Goods& 27537/WAG7& 14:46& 20 \
19.06.16& 1& 13151 Up Jammu Tawi Exp& 22906/WAP4& 13:19& 20 \
-do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 14006R/WDM3A& 13:28& 20 \
-do-& 3& 58 BOXN Loaded Goods& 24693/WAG9& 14:00& 5 to 20 \
hlinehline
end{tabular}
end{table}
%
begin{longtable}{$p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}}
caption{Cumulative GMT of Up Howrah-Barddhaman Chord line between Saktigarh and Barddhaman}
label{tab:GMT} \
hlinehline
Year &Annual GMT&Annual GMT per line&Cum GMT\
hline
1996-97& 38& 19& 480.155\
1997-98& 41& 20.5& 500.655\
1998-99& 42& 21& 521.655\
1999-00& 42& 21& 542.655\
2000-01& 40& 20& 562.655\
2001-02& 43& 21.5& 584.155\
2002-03& 42& 21& 605.155\
2003-04& 42& 21& 626.155\
2004-05& 44& 22& 648.155\
2005-06& 47& 23.5& 671.655\
2006-07& 46& 23& 694.655\
2007-08& 50& 25& 719.655\
2008-09& 58& 29& 748.655\
2009-10& 62& 31& 779.655\
2010-11& 63& 31.5& 811.155\
2011-12& 60& 30& 841.155\
2012-13& 62& 31& 872.155\
2013-14& 63& 31.5& 903.655\
2014-15& 63& 31.5& 935.155\
2015-16& 63& 31.5& 966.655\
hlinehline
multicolumn{5}{l}{Note: Data obtained from Track Modernization Cell of Eastern Railway}
end{longtable}
Sample calculation of effective cycles for the critical member i.e. cross girder (Strain gauge no. 2289) has been furnished in Table ref{tab:SampleCalc}.
begin{table}
centering
caption{Sample calculation of effective cycles for cross girder}
label{tab:SampleCalc}
begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.5in}^p{1.5in}}
hlinehline
Stress range in N/mm2&No. of observed effective cycles from Rain flow histogram (say a)&No. of modified effective cycles (ni) = ax(68/8)x1.4)&No. of theoretical cycles (Ni) as per S-N curve x $10^6$ \
hline
0-10& 117& 1392& 3990.00 \
10-20& 91& 1083& 498.75 \
20-30& 1& 11.9& 147.78 \
30-40& 2& 23.8& 62.34 \
40-50& 2& 23.8& 31.92 \
hlinehline
end{tabular}
end{table}
From Table ref{tab:reslifeeuro3}, it is seen that stringers (after replacement) are still the critical members from fatigue considerations with residual fatigue life of 169 years.
begin{sidewaystable}
centering
caption{Calculation of residual life from Fatigue considerations using S-N curve in Eurocode 3}
label{tab:reslifeeuro3}
begin{tabular}{lllllllllllllll}
hlinehline
multirow{3}{*}{Member} & multirow{3}{*}{Strain} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Observed ni for 8 trains (5 Pass + 3 Goods)} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Equated for 68 trains (48 Pass + 20 Goods)} & {Damage} & {Total} & {Residual} \
& & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & {per} & {life} & {life} \
& Gauge & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & {Day(D)} \
hline
multirow{1}{*}{Top chord} & 2897 & 125 & 4 & 3 & 1 & & 1488 & 47.6 & 35.7 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \
Vertical & 2895 & 18 & & & & & 214.2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
multirow{1}{*}{Diagonal} & 2892 & 92 & 1 & 2 & & & 1095 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
multirow{1}{*}{End raker} & 2829 & 36 & 0 & 2 & 1 & & 428.4 & 0 & 23.8 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \
multirow{1}{*}{Bottom chord} & 2891 & 109 & 9 & & & & 1297 & 107 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
multirow{1}{*}{Cross girder} & 2889 & 117 & 91 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 1392 & 1083 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 23.8 & 2.7767 & 296 & 204 \
multirow{1}{*}{Stringers} & 2890 & 107 & 111 & 1 & 2 & 4 & 1273 & 1321 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 47.6 & 4.8681 & 169 & 167* \
hlinehline \
multicolumn{5}{l}{*Not reduced as Stringers have been recently changed.} \
multicolumn{9}{l}{Theoretical cycles below 32MPa (stress below cut-off limit) have not been considered.}
end{tabular}
end{sidewaystable}
For this kind of cycle the maximum stress is equal to the minimum stress but completely opposite in nature i.e. $sigma _m$ = 0 as shown Fig. ref{fig:revcycle}.
begin{figure}
centering
includegraphics[scale=0.8]{HCFtest}
caption{Experimental Setup of High Cycle Fatigue test}
label{fig:hcftest}
end{figure}
pagebreak
end{document}
May kindly help..
Thanking you & regards Sitesh
tables floats positioning
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Sir/Madam!
My landscape tables are appearing in the body of the text whereas portrait tables are appearing at the end of the file. Please help me to remove the figures and tables from the text of my file and place them at the end of the file, after the tables and figure caption list. I am enclosing the code.
documentclass[Journal,letterpaper]{ascelike-new}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{graphicx} %Allows to import images
usepackage{float} %Allows for control of float positions
graphicspath{ {images/} }
%Tables preamble
usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
usepackage{array}
newcolumntype{$}{>{globalletcurrentrowstylerelax}}
newcolumntype{^}{>{currentrowstyle}}
newcommand{rowstyle}[1]{gdefcurrentrowstyle{#1} #1ignorespaces}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{pdflscape}
usepackage{lscape}
usepackage{rotating} % Provides {sideways}{sidewaysfigure}{sidewaystable} environments
usepackage[figurename=Fig.,labelfont=bf,labelsep=period]{caption}
usepackage{caption}
usepackage{subcaption}
captionsetup{compatibility=false}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage[colorlinks=true,citecolor=black,linkcolor=black]{hyperref}
usepackage{enumerate}% http://ctan.org/pkg/enumerate
%%Tables preamble
usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
usepackage{array}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{multirow}
usepackage{longtable}
usepackage{lipsum} % just for dummy text- not needed for a longtable
%Flowchart
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric, arrows}
NameTag{Singh, today}
begin{document}
The range of Strain transducer was +/- 4000 micro-strain, sensitivity = 500 micro-strain/Vout/Vext with accuracy < +/- 1 percent.
Based on theoretical simulation of the bridge using MATLAB, strain gages were placed at critical locations as shown in Fig. ref{fig:sensorloc}.
%begin{landscape}
%begin{figure}[p !]
begin{sidewaysfigure}
centering
includegraphics[width=columnwidth]{sensor_loc}
caption{Location of sensors}
label{fig:sensorloc}
end{sidewaysfigure}
%end{figure}
%end{landscape}
section{Observations and calculations}
The details of trains for which strains have been measured have been shown in Table ref{tab:train_run}.
begin{table}
centering
caption{Details of trains instrumented for Fatigue life estimation}
label{tab:train_run}
begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{.2in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.2in}^p{.4in}^p{1in}}
hlinehline
Date& Run No& Train details& Engine details& Time (Hrs)& Speed (Kmph) \
hline
18.06.16& 1& 59 BOXN Empty Goods& 27540WAG7& 13:03& 20 to 5 to 20 \
-do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 16225R/WDM3A& 13:35& 20 \
-do-& 3& 12369 Up Upasana Exp& 22650/WAP4& 14:18& 20 \
-do-& 4& 11448 Up Shaktipunj Exp& 22531/WAP4& 14:26& 20 \
-do-& 5& 59 BXNHS Loaded Goods& 27537/WAG7& 14:46& 20 \
19.06.16& 1& 13151 Up Jammu Tawi Exp& 22906/WAP4& 13:19& 20 \
-do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 14006R/WDM3A& 13:28& 20 \
-do-& 3& 58 BOXN Loaded Goods& 24693/WAG9& 14:00& 5 to 20 \
hlinehline
end{tabular}
end{table}
%
begin{longtable}{$p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}}
caption{Cumulative GMT of Up Howrah-Barddhaman Chord line between Saktigarh and Barddhaman}
label{tab:GMT} \
hlinehline
Year &Annual GMT&Annual GMT per line&Cum GMT\
hline
1996-97& 38& 19& 480.155\
1997-98& 41& 20.5& 500.655\
1998-99& 42& 21& 521.655\
1999-00& 42& 21& 542.655\
2000-01& 40& 20& 562.655\
2001-02& 43& 21.5& 584.155\
2002-03& 42& 21& 605.155\
2003-04& 42& 21& 626.155\
2004-05& 44& 22& 648.155\
2005-06& 47& 23.5& 671.655\
2006-07& 46& 23& 694.655\
2007-08& 50& 25& 719.655\
2008-09& 58& 29& 748.655\
2009-10& 62& 31& 779.655\
2010-11& 63& 31.5& 811.155\
2011-12& 60& 30& 841.155\
2012-13& 62& 31& 872.155\
2013-14& 63& 31.5& 903.655\
2014-15& 63& 31.5& 935.155\
2015-16& 63& 31.5& 966.655\
hlinehline
multicolumn{5}{l}{Note: Data obtained from Track Modernization Cell of Eastern Railway}
end{longtable}
Sample calculation of effective cycles for the critical member i.e. cross girder (Strain gauge no. 2289) has been furnished in Table ref{tab:SampleCalc}.
begin{table}
centering
caption{Sample calculation of effective cycles for cross girder}
label{tab:SampleCalc}
begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.5in}^p{1.5in}}
hlinehline
Stress range in N/mm2&No. of observed effective cycles from Rain flow histogram (say a)&No. of modified effective cycles (ni) = ax(68/8)x1.4)&No. of theoretical cycles (Ni) as per S-N curve x $10^6$ \
hline
0-10& 117& 1392& 3990.00 \
10-20& 91& 1083& 498.75 \
20-30& 1& 11.9& 147.78 \
30-40& 2& 23.8& 62.34 \
40-50& 2& 23.8& 31.92 \
hlinehline
end{tabular}
end{table}
From Table ref{tab:reslifeeuro3}, it is seen that stringers (after replacement) are still the critical members from fatigue considerations with residual fatigue life of 169 years.
begin{sidewaystable}
centering
caption{Calculation of residual life from Fatigue considerations using S-N curve in Eurocode 3}
label{tab:reslifeeuro3}
begin{tabular}{lllllllllllllll}
hlinehline
multirow{3}{*}{Member} & multirow{3}{*}{Strain} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Observed ni for 8 trains (5 Pass + 3 Goods)} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Equated for 68 trains (48 Pass + 20 Goods)} & {Damage} & {Total} & {Residual} \
& & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & {per} & {life} & {life} \
& Gauge & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & {Day(D)} \
hline
multirow{1}{*}{Top chord} & 2897 & 125 & 4 & 3 & 1 & & 1488 & 47.6 & 35.7 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \
Vertical & 2895 & 18 & & & & & 214.2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
multirow{1}{*}{Diagonal} & 2892 & 92 & 1 & 2 & & & 1095 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
multirow{1}{*}{End raker} & 2829 & 36 & 0 & 2 & 1 & & 428.4 & 0 & 23.8 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \
multirow{1}{*}{Bottom chord} & 2891 & 109 & 9 & & & & 1297 & 107 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
multirow{1}{*}{Cross girder} & 2889 & 117 & 91 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 1392 & 1083 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 23.8 & 2.7767 & 296 & 204 \
multirow{1}{*}{Stringers} & 2890 & 107 & 111 & 1 & 2 & 4 & 1273 & 1321 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 47.6 & 4.8681 & 169 & 167* \
hlinehline \
multicolumn{5}{l}{*Not reduced as Stringers have been recently changed.} \
multicolumn{9}{l}{Theoretical cycles below 32MPa (stress below cut-off limit) have not been considered.}
end{tabular}
end{sidewaystable}
For this kind of cycle the maximum stress is equal to the minimum stress but completely opposite in nature i.e. $sigma _m$ = 0 as shown Fig. ref{fig:revcycle}.
begin{figure}
centering
includegraphics[scale=0.8]{HCFtest}
caption{Experimental Setup of High Cycle Fatigue test}
label{fig:hcftest}
end{figure}
pagebreak
end{document}
May kindly help..
Thanking you & regards Sitesh
tables floats positioning
Sir/Madam!
My landscape tables are appearing in the body of the text whereas portrait tables are appearing at the end of the file. Please help me to remove the figures and tables from the text of my file and place them at the end of the file, after the tables and figure caption list. I am enclosing the code.
documentclass[Journal,letterpaper]{ascelike-new}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{graphicx} %Allows to import images
usepackage{float} %Allows for control of float positions
graphicspath{ {images/} }
%Tables preamble
usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
usepackage{array}
newcolumntype{$}{>{globalletcurrentrowstylerelax}}
newcolumntype{^}{>{currentrowstyle}}
newcommand{rowstyle}[1]{gdefcurrentrowstyle{#1} #1ignorespaces}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{pdflscape}
usepackage{lscape}
usepackage{rotating} % Provides {sideways}{sidewaysfigure}{sidewaystable} environments
usepackage[figurename=Fig.,labelfont=bf,labelsep=period]{caption}
usepackage{caption}
usepackage{subcaption}
captionsetup{compatibility=false}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage[colorlinks=true,citecolor=black,linkcolor=black]{hyperref}
usepackage{enumerate}% http://ctan.org/pkg/enumerate
%%Tables preamble
usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
usepackage{array}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{multirow}
usepackage{longtable}
usepackage{lipsum} % just for dummy text- not needed for a longtable
%Flowchart
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric, arrows}
NameTag{Singh, today}
begin{document}
The range of Strain transducer was +/- 4000 micro-strain, sensitivity = 500 micro-strain/Vout/Vext with accuracy < +/- 1 percent.
Based on theoretical simulation of the bridge using MATLAB, strain gages were placed at critical locations as shown in Fig. ref{fig:sensorloc}.
%begin{landscape}
%begin{figure}[p !]
begin{sidewaysfigure}
centering
includegraphics[width=columnwidth]{sensor_loc}
caption{Location of sensors}
label{fig:sensorloc}
end{sidewaysfigure}
%end{figure}
%end{landscape}
section{Observations and calculations}
The details of trains for which strains have been measured have been shown in Table ref{tab:train_run}.
begin{table}
centering
caption{Details of trains instrumented for Fatigue life estimation}
label{tab:train_run}
begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{.2in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.2in}^p{.4in}^p{1in}}
hlinehline
Date& Run No& Train details& Engine details& Time (Hrs)& Speed (Kmph) \
hline
18.06.16& 1& 59 BOXN Empty Goods& 27540WAG7& 13:03& 20 to 5 to 20 \
-do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 16225R/WDM3A& 13:35& 20 \
-do-& 3& 12369 Up Upasana Exp& 22650/WAP4& 14:18& 20 \
-do-& 4& 11448 Up Shaktipunj Exp& 22531/WAP4& 14:26& 20 \
-do-& 5& 59 BXNHS Loaded Goods& 27537/WAG7& 14:46& 20 \
19.06.16& 1& 13151 Up Jammu Tawi Exp& 22906/WAP4& 13:19& 20 \
-do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 14006R/WDM3A& 13:28& 20 \
-do-& 3& 58 BOXN Loaded Goods& 24693/WAG9& 14:00& 5 to 20 \
hlinehline
end{tabular}
end{table}
%
begin{longtable}{$p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}}
caption{Cumulative GMT of Up Howrah-Barddhaman Chord line between Saktigarh and Barddhaman}
label{tab:GMT} \
hlinehline
Year &Annual GMT&Annual GMT per line&Cum GMT\
hline
1996-97& 38& 19& 480.155\
1997-98& 41& 20.5& 500.655\
1998-99& 42& 21& 521.655\
1999-00& 42& 21& 542.655\
2000-01& 40& 20& 562.655\
2001-02& 43& 21.5& 584.155\
2002-03& 42& 21& 605.155\
2003-04& 42& 21& 626.155\
2004-05& 44& 22& 648.155\
2005-06& 47& 23.5& 671.655\
2006-07& 46& 23& 694.655\
2007-08& 50& 25& 719.655\
2008-09& 58& 29& 748.655\
2009-10& 62& 31& 779.655\
2010-11& 63& 31.5& 811.155\
2011-12& 60& 30& 841.155\
2012-13& 62& 31& 872.155\
2013-14& 63& 31.5& 903.655\
2014-15& 63& 31.5& 935.155\
2015-16& 63& 31.5& 966.655\
hlinehline
multicolumn{5}{l}{Note: Data obtained from Track Modernization Cell of Eastern Railway}
end{longtable}
Sample calculation of effective cycles for the critical member i.e. cross girder (Strain gauge no. 2289) has been furnished in Table ref{tab:SampleCalc}.
begin{table}
centering
caption{Sample calculation of effective cycles for cross girder}
label{tab:SampleCalc}
begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.5in}^p{1.5in}}
hlinehline
Stress range in N/mm2&No. of observed effective cycles from Rain flow histogram (say a)&No. of modified effective cycles (ni) = ax(68/8)x1.4)&No. of theoretical cycles (Ni) as per S-N curve x $10^6$ \
hline
0-10& 117& 1392& 3990.00 \
10-20& 91& 1083& 498.75 \
20-30& 1& 11.9& 147.78 \
30-40& 2& 23.8& 62.34 \
40-50& 2& 23.8& 31.92 \
hlinehline
end{tabular}
end{table}
From Table ref{tab:reslifeeuro3}, it is seen that stringers (after replacement) are still the critical members from fatigue considerations with residual fatigue life of 169 years.
begin{sidewaystable}
centering
caption{Calculation of residual life from Fatigue considerations using S-N curve in Eurocode 3}
label{tab:reslifeeuro3}
begin{tabular}{lllllllllllllll}
hlinehline
multirow{3}{*}{Member} & multirow{3}{*}{Strain} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Observed ni for 8 trains (5 Pass + 3 Goods)} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Equated for 68 trains (48 Pass + 20 Goods)} & {Damage} & {Total} & {Residual} \
& & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & {per} & {life} & {life} \
& Gauge & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & {Day(D)} \
hline
multirow{1}{*}{Top chord} & 2897 & 125 & 4 & 3 & 1 & & 1488 & 47.6 & 35.7 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \
Vertical & 2895 & 18 & & & & & 214.2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
multirow{1}{*}{Diagonal} & 2892 & 92 & 1 & 2 & & & 1095 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
multirow{1}{*}{End raker} & 2829 & 36 & 0 & 2 & 1 & & 428.4 & 0 & 23.8 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \
multirow{1}{*}{Bottom chord} & 2891 & 109 & 9 & & & & 1297 & 107 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
multirow{1}{*}{Cross girder} & 2889 & 117 & 91 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 1392 & 1083 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 23.8 & 2.7767 & 296 & 204 \
multirow{1}{*}{Stringers} & 2890 & 107 & 111 & 1 & 2 & 4 & 1273 & 1321 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 47.6 & 4.8681 & 169 & 167* \
hlinehline \
multicolumn{5}{l}{*Not reduced as Stringers have been recently changed.} \
multicolumn{9}{l}{Theoretical cycles below 32MPa (stress below cut-off limit) have not been considered.}
end{tabular}
end{sidewaystable}
For this kind of cycle the maximum stress is equal to the minimum stress but completely opposite in nature i.e. $sigma _m$ = 0 as shown Fig. ref{fig:revcycle}.
begin{figure}
centering
includegraphics[scale=0.8]{HCFtest}
caption{Experimental Setup of High Cycle Fatigue test}
label{fig:hcftest}
end{figure}
pagebreak
end{document}
May kindly help..
Thanking you & regards Sitesh
tables floats positioning
tables floats positioning
edited 5 hours ago
Zarko
117k865155
117k865155
asked 5 hours ago
Sitesh Singh
112
112
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462290%2fpositioning-tables-and-figures-at-the-end-of-the-respective-caption-list%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown