Why does the command ps not display the entire list of processes?
If the command ps awx is run the following output is produced. The list below is the last 20 lines of the complete output.
4247 pts/1 Ss+ 0:00 /bin/bash
4442 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:1]
4661 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:3]
4731 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:5]
4734 ? S 0:00 pickup -l -t fifo -u
4847 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:7]
4850 ? S 0:00 [kworker/u16:3]
4878 ? S 0:00 [kworker/u16:0]
5201 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:8]
5353 ? S 0:00 [kworker/0:1]
5354 ? S 0:00 [kworker/7:2]
5355 ? S 0:00 [kworker/u16:2]
5361 ? S 0:00 [kworker/4:0]
5362 tty1 Ss 0:00 -bash
5396 ? S 0:00 [kworker/6:0]
5418 ? S 0:00 [kworker/0:0]
5420 ? S 0:00 [kworker/2:2]
5431 ? S 0:00 [kworker/7:0]
5562 ? S 0:00 [kworker/4:2]
5620 tty1 R+ 0:00 ps awx
If a subsequent command ps awx | grep grep is run the following output is generated.
5646 tty1 S+ 0:00 grep --color=auto grep
Additionally if the following command ps awx | grep agetty is run, the following output is displayed.
5669 tty1 S+ 0:00 grep --color=auto agetty
Why does the command ps awx not display the process identification numbers 5646 and 5669? In fact there are no other processes listed after 5620.
bash ps
asked 7 mins ago
MotivatedMotivated
2098
add a comment |
If the command ps awx is run the following output is produced. The list below is the last 20 lines of the complete output.
4247 pts/1 Ss+ 0:00 /bin/bash
4442 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:1]
4661 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:3]
4731 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:5]
4734 ? S 0:00 pickup -l -t fifo -u
4847 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:7]
4850 ? S 0:00 [kworker/u16:3]
4878 ? S 0:00 [kworker/u16:0]
5201 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:8]
5353 ? S 0:00 [kworker/0:1]
5354 ? S 0:00 [kworker/7:2]
5355 ? S 0:00 [kworker/u16:2]
5361 ? S 0:00 [kworker/4:0]
5362 tty1 Ss 0:00 -bash
5396 ? S 0:00 [kworker/6:0]
5418 ? S 0:00 [kworker/0:0]
5420 ? S 0:00 [kworker/2:2]
5431 ? S 0:00 [kworker/7:0]
5562 ? S 0:00 [kworker/4:2]
5620 tty1 R+ 0:00 ps awx
If a subsequent command ps awx | grep grep is run the following output is generated.
5646 tty1 S+ 0:00 grep --color=auto grep
Additionally if the following command ps awx | grep agetty is run, the following output is displayed.
5669 tty1 S+ 0:00 grep --color=auto agetty
Why does the command ps awx not display the process identification numbers 5646 and 5669? In fact there are no other processes listed after 5620.
bash ps
asked 7 mins ago
MotivatedMotivated
2098
Show the complete list ofps awx. From the initial looks5646is not even there in your given information
– Inian
4 mins ago
add a comment |
If the command ps awx is run the following output is produced. The list below is the last 20 lines of the complete output.
4247 pts/1 Ss+ 0:00 /bin/bash
4442 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:1]
4661 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:3]
4731 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:5]
4734 ? S 0:00 pickup -l -t fifo -u
4847 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:7]
4850 ? S 0:00 [kworker/u16:3]
4878 ? S 0:00 [kworker/u16:0]
5201 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:8]
5353 ? S 0:00 [kworker/0:1]
5354 ? S 0:00 [kworker/7:2]
5355 ? S 0:00 [kworker/u16:2]
5361 ? S 0:00 [kworker/4:0]
5362 tty1 Ss 0:00 -bash
5396 ? S 0:00 [kworker/6:0]
5418 ? S 0:00 [kworker/0:0]
5420 ? S 0:00 [kworker/2:2]
5431 ? S 0:00 [kworker/7:0]
5562 ? S 0:00 [kworker/4:2]
5620 tty1 R+ 0:00 ps awx
If a subsequent command ps awx | grep grep is run the following output is generated.
5646 tty1 S+ 0:00 grep --color=auto grep
Additionally if the following command ps awx | grep agetty is run, the following output is displayed.
5669 tty1 S+ 0:00 grep --color=auto agetty
Why does the command ps awx not display the process identification numbers 5646 and 5669? In fact there are no other processes listed after 5620.
bash ps
asked 7 mins ago
MotivatedMotivated
2098
If the command ps awx is run the following output is produced. The list below is the last 20 lines of the complete output.
4247 pts/1 Ss+ 0:00 /bin/bash
4442 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:1]
4661 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:3]
4731 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:5]
4734 ? S 0:00 pickup -l -t fifo -u
4847 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:7]
4850 ? S 0:00 [kworker/u16:3]
4878 ? S 0:00 [kworker/u16:0]
5201 ? S< 0:00 [kworker/u17:8]
5353 ? S 0:00 [kworker/0:1]
5354 ? S 0:00 [kworker/7:2]
5355 ? S 0:00 [kworker/u16:2]
5361 ? S 0:00 [kworker/4:0]
5362 tty1 Ss 0:00 -bash
5396 ? S 0:00 [kworker/6:0]
5418 ? S 0:00 [kworker/0:0]
5420 ? S 0:00 [kworker/2:2]
5431 ? S 0:00 [kworker/7:0]
5562 ? S 0:00 [kworker/4:2]
5620 tty1 R+ 0:00 ps awx
If a subsequent command ps awx | grep grep is run the following output is generated.
5646 tty1 S+ 0:00 grep --color=auto grep
Additionally if the following command ps awx | grep agetty is run, the following output is displayed.
5669 tty1 S+ 0:00 grep --color=auto agetty
Why does the command ps awx not display the process identification numbers 5646 and 5669? In fact there are no other processes listed after 5620.
bash ps
bash ps
asked 7 mins ago
MotivatedMotivated
2098
asked 7 mins ago
MotivatedMotivated
2098
asked 7 mins ago
MotivatedMotivated
2098
asked 7 mins ago
MotivatedMotivated
2098
asked 7 mins ago
MotivatedMotivated
2098
2098
Show the complete list ofps awx. From the initial looks5646is not even there in your given information
– Inian
4 mins ago
add a comment |
Show the complete list ofps awx. From the initial looks5646is not even there in your given information
– Inian
4 mins ago
Show the complete list of
ps awx. From the initial looks 5646 is not even there in your given information– Inian
4 mins ago
Show the complete list of
ps awx. From the initial looks 5646 is not even there in your given information– Inian
4 mins ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f497128%2fwhy-does-the-command-ps-not-display-the-entire-list-of-processes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f497128%2fwhy-does-the-command-ps-not-display-the-entire-list-of-processes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Show the complete list of
ps awx. From the initial looks5646is not even there in your given information– Inian
4 mins ago