Logic operators in LaTeX? (XOR?)
40
When I google this, it seems that XOR is how you would get an XOR symbol in LaTeX, however that is giving me the 'undefined control sequence' error. How does one get the xor symbol?
symbols
edited Oct 9 '10 at 4:10
TH.
47.4k10129197
add a comment |
40
When I google this, it seems that XOR is how you would get an XOR symbol in LaTeX, however that is giving me the 'undefined control sequence' error. How does one get the xor symbol?
symbols
edited Oct 9 '10 at 4:10
TH.
47.4k10129197
2
You probably need to load some package. However,symbolsdoes not listxor, so I can’t help you without knowing what the symbol looks like. Have a look at “How to look up a math symbol?” for ideas how you can easily find a particular symbol.
– Caramdir
Oct 9 '10 at 4:07
1
Shouldn't you accept A T's answer instead of TH.'s? Sinceoplusis clearly superior tomathbin{oplus}ornewcommand*xor{mathbin{oplus}}.
– Eric
Feb 18 '16 at 7:51
add a comment |
40
40
40
2
When I google this, it seems that XOR is how you would get an XOR symbol in LaTeX, however that is giving me the 'undefined control sequence' error. How does one get the xor symbol?
symbols
edited Oct 9 '10 at 4:10
TH.
47.4k10129197
When I google this, it seems that XOR is how you would get an XOR symbol in LaTeX, however that is giving me the 'undefined control sequence' error. How does one get the xor symbol?
symbols
symbols
edited Oct 9 '10 at 4:10
TH.
47.4k10129197
edited Oct 9 '10 at 4:10
TH.
47.4k10129197
edited Oct 9 '10 at 4:10
TH.
47.4k10129197
edited Oct 9 '10 at 4:10
TH.
47.4k10129197
edited Oct 9 '10 at 4:10
TH.
47.4k10129197
47.4k10129197
asked Oct 9 '10 at 3:51
whatnow
2
You probably need to load some package. However,symbolsdoes not listxor, so I can’t help you without knowing what the symbol looks like. Have a look at “How to look up a math symbol?” for ideas how you can easily find a particular symbol.
– Caramdir
Oct 9 '10 at 4:07
1
Shouldn't you accept A T's answer instead of TH.'s? Sinceoplusis clearly superior tomathbin{oplus}ornewcommand*xor{mathbin{oplus}}.
– Eric
Feb 18 '16 at 7:51
add a comment |
2
You probably need to load some package. However,symbolsdoes not listxor, so I can’t help you without knowing what the symbol looks like. Have a look at “How to look up a math symbol?” for ideas how you can easily find a particular symbol.
– Caramdir
Oct 9 '10 at 4:07
1
Shouldn't you accept A T's answer instead of TH.'s? Sinceoplusis clearly superior tomathbin{oplus}ornewcommand*xor{mathbin{oplus}}.
– Eric
Feb 18 '16 at 7:51
2
2
You probably need to load some package. However,
symbols does not list xor, so I can’t help you without knowing what the symbol looks like. Have a look at “How to look up a math symbol?” for ideas how you can easily find a particular symbol.– Caramdir
Oct 9 '10 at 4:07
You probably need to load some package. However,
symbols does not list xor, so I can’t help you without knowing what the symbol looks like. Have a look at “How to look up a math symbol?” for ideas how you can easily find a particular symbol.– Caramdir
Oct 9 '10 at 4:07
1
1
Shouldn't you accept A T's answer instead of TH.'s? Since
oplus is clearly superior to mathbin{oplus} or newcommand*xor{mathbin{oplus}}.– Eric
Feb 18 '16 at 7:51
Shouldn't you accept A T's answer instead of TH.'s? Since
oplus is clearly superior to mathbin{oplus} or newcommand*xor{mathbin{oplus}}.– Eric
Feb 18 '16 at 7:51
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
24
How about newcommand*xor{mathbin{oplus}}?
Edit: As everybody has pointed out, the mathbin is unnecessary. I can't delete the accepted answer, sorry.
answered Oct 9 '10 at 4:10
TH.TH.
47.4k10129197
16
I think themathbinisn't strictly necessary becauseoplusis already a binary operator.
– Philipp
Oct 9 '10 at 9:31
This is so unnecessary, just do oplus
– Axel Kennedal
3 hours ago
@AxelKennedal, it's been 8 years since this question was asked, the questioner doesn't appear to have an account any more, and your comments just repeat what others already said 8 years ago. I'm not really sure what you want me to do here.
– TH.
4 mins ago
add a comment |
61
oplus worked for me :)
I found this in List of logic symbols :P
answered Nov 30 '11 at 14:55
A TA T
1,89952343
1
This should be the accepted answer!
– Axel Kennedal
3 hours ago
add a comment |
8
What you're looking for is veebar in amssymb.
usepackage{amssymb}
$veebar$
If you like, you can create a new command lxor, named to match lor and land:
providecommand{lxor}{veebar}
edited Oct 15 '12 at 1:17
Scott H.
8,17222463
answered Oct 15 '12 at 1:11
Jonathan BaldwinJonathan Baldwin
18013
1
Hey, just added some code tags for you :)
– Scott H.
Oct 15 '12 at 1:18
add a comment |
3
I found a bit lame solution, but it works for me. Just do:
underline{vee}
edited Nov 9 '11 at 19:49
Stefan Kottwitz♦
176k63570759
answered Nov 9 '11 at 19:41
MushMush
311
5
what aboutveebarfrom the mathabx package?
– jon
Nov 30 '11 at 16:01
add a comment |
3
Another way of representing the XOR connective is by using a W-like symbol (as in p W q), also used in Set Theory to refer to disjunctive union. Since this symbol does not seem to appear in the Comprehensive LaTeX symbol list, you can create it by joining two "or" connectives together through the following command:
newcommand{xor}{%
mathbin{%
{vee}mspace{-2.9mu}nonscriptmspace{0.3mu}{vee}%
}%
}
that however doesn't work on second levels subscripts/superscripts
Full example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{xor}{%
mathbin{%
{vee}mspace{-2.9mu}nonscriptmspace{0.3mu}{vee}%
}%
}
begin{document}
$Axor B_{x xor y}$
end{document}
edited Apr 21 '16 at 7:59
egreg
714k8618983184
answered Apr 21 '16 at 1:25
Maxime Sainte-MarieMaxime Sainte-Marie
313
1
Welcome! Please provide a complete example. What definesmspace? It is not a default LaTeX command.
– cfr
Apr 21 '16 at 1:38
1
Thanks! It would still be better to give a complete example even though other answers to this question don't. Also, I'm pretty sure this can't possibly be a good way to do it, but I've up-voting anyway as I appreciate the effort ;). (It can't be right to add space like that in maths mode and shouldn't this be declared as a maths symbol?)
– cfr
Apr 21 '16 at 1:50
You're right about the example, the spaces and the symbol declaration. The command still needs some fine-tuning. Thanks for the feedback and advice!
– Maxime Sainte-Marie
Apr 21 '16 at 5:15
3
I've taken the liberty of turning your good idea into working code;DeclareMathOperatorwas not the correct tool andooaligndid nothing; usingmspaceandmuunits allows for making it work also in sub/superscripts (alas, not in second level ones).
– egreg
Apr 21 '16 at 8:01
add a comment |
1
I use this one overline{vee}.
edited Sep 25 '12 at 21:05
Kurt
36.1k847161
answered Sep 25 '12 at 20:08
DeepakDeepak
111
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3936%2flogic-operators-in-latex-xor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
24
How about newcommand*xor{mathbin{oplus}}?
Edit: As everybody has pointed out, the mathbin is unnecessary. I can't delete the accepted answer, sorry.
answered Oct 9 '10 at 4:10
TH.TH.
47.4k10129197
16
I think themathbinisn't strictly necessary becauseoplusis already a binary operator.
– Philipp
Oct 9 '10 at 9:31
This is so unnecessary, just do oplus
– Axel Kennedal
3 hours ago
@AxelKennedal, it's been 8 years since this question was asked, the questioner doesn't appear to have an account any more, and your comments just repeat what others already said 8 years ago. I'm not really sure what you want me to do here.
– TH.
4 mins ago
add a comment |
24
How about newcommand*xor{mathbin{oplus}}?
Edit: As everybody has pointed out, the mathbin is unnecessary. I can't delete the accepted answer, sorry.
answered Oct 9 '10 at 4:10
TH.TH.
47.4k10129197
16
I think themathbinisn't strictly necessary becauseoplusis already a binary operator.
– Philipp
Oct 9 '10 at 9:31
This is so unnecessary, just do oplus
– Axel Kennedal
3 hours ago
@AxelKennedal, it's been 8 years since this question was asked, the questioner doesn't appear to have an account any more, and your comments just repeat what others already said 8 years ago. I'm not really sure what you want me to do here.
– TH.
4 mins ago
add a comment |
24
24
24
How about newcommand*xor{mathbin{oplus}}?
Edit: As everybody has pointed out, the mathbin is unnecessary. I can't delete the accepted answer, sorry.
answered Oct 9 '10 at 4:10
TH.TH.
47.4k10129197
How about newcommand*xor{mathbin{oplus}}?
Edit: As everybody has pointed out, the mathbin is unnecessary. I can't delete the accepted answer, sorry.
answered Oct 9 '10 at 4:10
TH.TH.
47.4k10129197
edited 15 mins ago
answered Oct 9 '10 at 4:10
TH.TH.
47.4k10129197
answered Oct 9 '10 at 4:10
TH.TH.
47.4k10129197
answered Oct 9 '10 at 4:10
TH.TH.
47.4k10129197
47.4k10129197
16
I think themathbinisn't strictly necessary becauseoplusis already a binary operator.
– Philipp
Oct 9 '10 at 9:31
This is so unnecessary, just do oplus
– Axel Kennedal
3 hours ago
@AxelKennedal, it's been 8 years since this question was asked, the questioner doesn't appear to have an account any more, and your comments just repeat what others already said 8 years ago. I'm not really sure what you want me to do here.
– TH.
4 mins ago
add a comment |
16
I think themathbinisn't strictly necessary becauseoplusis already a binary operator.
– Philipp
Oct 9 '10 at 9:31
This is so unnecessary, just do oplus
– Axel Kennedal
3 hours ago
@AxelKennedal, it's been 8 years since this question was asked, the questioner doesn't appear to have an account any more, and your comments just repeat what others already said 8 years ago. I'm not really sure what you want me to do here.
– TH.
4 mins ago
16
16
I think the
mathbin isn't strictly necessary because oplus is already a binary operator.– Philipp
Oct 9 '10 at 9:31
I think the
mathbin isn't strictly necessary because oplus is already a binary operator.– Philipp
Oct 9 '10 at 9:31
This is so unnecessary, just do oplus
– Axel Kennedal
3 hours ago
This is so unnecessary, just do oplus
– Axel Kennedal
3 hours ago
@AxelKennedal, it's been 8 years since this question was asked, the questioner doesn't appear to have an account any more, and your comments just repeat what others already said 8 years ago. I'm not really sure what you want me to do here.
– TH.
4 mins ago
@AxelKennedal, it's been 8 years since this question was asked, the questioner doesn't appear to have an account any more, and your comments just repeat what others already said 8 years ago. I'm not really sure what you want me to do here.
– TH.
4 mins ago
add a comment |
61
oplus worked for me :)
I found this in List of logic symbols :P
answered Nov 30 '11 at 14:55
A TA T
1,89952343
1
This should be the accepted answer!
– Axel Kennedal
3 hours ago
add a comment |
61
oplus worked for me :)
I found this in List of logic symbols :P
answered Nov 30 '11 at 14:55
A TA T
1,89952343
1
This should be the accepted answer!
– Axel Kennedal
3 hours ago
add a comment |
61
61
61
oplus worked for me :)
I found this in List of logic symbols :P
answered Nov 30 '11 at 14:55
A TA T
1,89952343
oplus worked for me :)
I found this in List of logic symbols :P
answered Nov 30 '11 at 14:55
A TA T
1,89952343
answered Nov 30 '11 at 14:55
A TA T
1,89952343
answered Nov 30 '11 at 14:55
A TA T
1,89952343
answered Nov 30 '11 at 14:55
A TA T
1,89952343
1,89952343
1
This should be the accepted answer!
– Axel Kennedal
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
This should be the accepted answer!
– Axel Kennedal
3 hours ago
1
1
This should be the accepted answer!
– Axel Kennedal
3 hours ago
This should be the accepted answer!
– Axel Kennedal
3 hours ago
add a comment |
8
What you're looking for is veebar in amssymb.
usepackage{amssymb}
$veebar$
If you like, you can create a new command lxor, named to match lor and land:
providecommand{lxor}{veebar}
edited Oct 15 '12 at 1:17
Scott H.
8,17222463
answered Oct 15 '12 at 1:11
Jonathan BaldwinJonathan Baldwin
18013
1
Hey, just added some code tags for you :)
– Scott H.
Oct 15 '12 at 1:18
add a comment |
8
What you're looking for is veebar in amssymb.
usepackage{amssymb}
$veebar$
If you like, you can create a new command lxor, named to match lor and land:
providecommand{lxor}{veebar}
edited Oct 15 '12 at 1:17
Scott H.
8,17222463
answered Oct 15 '12 at 1:11
Jonathan BaldwinJonathan Baldwin
18013
1
Hey, just added some code tags for you :)
– Scott H.
Oct 15 '12 at 1:18
add a comment |
8
8
8
What you're looking for is veebar in amssymb.
usepackage{amssymb}
$veebar$
If you like, you can create a new command lxor, named to match lor and land:
providecommand{lxor}{veebar}
edited Oct 15 '12 at 1:17
Scott H.
8,17222463
answered Oct 15 '12 at 1:11
Jonathan BaldwinJonathan Baldwin
18013
What you're looking for is veebar in amssymb.
usepackage{amssymb}
$veebar$
If you like, you can create a new command lxor, named to match lor and land:
providecommand{lxor}{veebar}
edited Oct 15 '12 at 1:17
Scott H.
8,17222463
answered Oct 15 '12 at 1:11
Jonathan BaldwinJonathan Baldwin
18013
edited Oct 15 '12 at 1:17
Scott H.
8,17222463
edited Oct 15 '12 at 1:17
Scott H.
8,17222463
edited Oct 15 '12 at 1:17
Scott H.
8,17222463
8,17222463
answered Oct 15 '12 at 1:11
Jonathan BaldwinJonathan Baldwin
18013
answered Oct 15 '12 at 1:11
Jonathan BaldwinJonathan Baldwin
18013
answered Oct 15 '12 at 1:11
Jonathan BaldwinJonathan Baldwin
18013
18013
1
Hey, just added some code tags for you :)
– Scott H.
Oct 15 '12 at 1:18
add a comment |
1
Hey, just added some code tags for you :)
– Scott H.
Oct 15 '12 at 1:18
1
1
Hey, just added some code tags for you :)
– Scott H.
Oct 15 '12 at 1:18
Hey, just added some code tags for you :)
– Scott H.
Oct 15 '12 at 1:18
add a comment |
3
I found a bit lame solution, but it works for me. Just do:
underline{vee}
edited Nov 9 '11 at 19:49
Stefan Kottwitz♦
176k63570759
answered Nov 9 '11 at 19:41
MushMush
311
5
what aboutveebarfrom the mathabx package?
– jon
Nov 30 '11 at 16:01
add a comment |
3
I found a bit lame solution, but it works for me. Just do:
underline{vee}
edited Nov 9 '11 at 19:49
Stefan Kottwitz♦
176k63570759
answered Nov 9 '11 at 19:41
MushMush
311
5
what aboutveebarfrom the mathabx package?
– jon
Nov 30 '11 at 16:01
add a comment |
3
3
3
I found a bit lame solution, but it works for me. Just do:
underline{vee}
edited Nov 9 '11 at 19:49
Stefan Kottwitz♦
176k63570759
answered Nov 9 '11 at 19:41
MushMush
311
I found a bit lame solution, but it works for me. Just do:
underline{vee}
edited Nov 9 '11 at 19:49
Stefan Kottwitz♦
176k63570759
answered Nov 9 '11 at 19:41
MushMush
311
edited Nov 9 '11 at 19:49
Stefan Kottwitz♦
176k63570759
edited Nov 9 '11 at 19:49
Stefan Kottwitz♦
176k63570759
edited Nov 9 '11 at 19:49
Stefan Kottwitz♦
176k63570759
176k63570759
answered Nov 9 '11 at 19:41
MushMush
311
answered Nov 9 '11 at 19:41
MushMush
311
answered Nov 9 '11 at 19:41
MushMush
311
311
5
what aboutveebarfrom the mathabx package?
– jon
Nov 30 '11 at 16:01
add a comment |
5
what aboutveebarfrom the mathabx package?
– jon
Nov 30 '11 at 16:01
5
5
what about
veebar from the mathabx package?– jon
Nov 30 '11 at 16:01
what about
veebar from the mathabx package?– jon
Nov 30 '11 at 16:01
add a comment |
3
Another way of representing the XOR connective is by using a W-like symbol (as in p W q), also used in Set Theory to refer to disjunctive union. Since this symbol does not seem to appear in the Comprehensive LaTeX symbol list, you can create it by joining two "or" connectives together through the following command:
newcommand{xor}{%
mathbin{%
{vee}mspace{-2.9mu}nonscriptmspace{0.3mu}{vee}%
}%
}
that however doesn't work on second levels subscripts/superscripts
Full example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{xor}{%
mathbin{%
{vee}mspace{-2.9mu}nonscriptmspace{0.3mu}{vee}%
}%
}
begin{document}
$Axor B_{x xor y}$
end{document}
edited Apr 21 '16 at 7:59
egreg
714k8618983184
answered Apr 21 '16 at 1:25
Maxime Sainte-MarieMaxime Sainte-Marie
313
1
Welcome! Please provide a complete example. What definesmspace? It is not a default LaTeX command.
– cfr
Apr 21 '16 at 1:38
1
Thanks! It would still be better to give a complete example even though other answers to this question don't. Also, I'm pretty sure this can't possibly be a good way to do it, but I've up-voting anyway as I appreciate the effort ;). (It can't be right to add space like that in maths mode and shouldn't this be declared as a maths symbol?)
– cfr
Apr 21 '16 at 1:50
You're right about the example, the spaces and the symbol declaration. The command still needs some fine-tuning. Thanks for the feedback and advice!
– Maxime Sainte-Marie
Apr 21 '16 at 5:15
3
I've taken the liberty of turning your good idea into working code;DeclareMathOperatorwas not the correct tool andooaligndid nothing; usingmspaceandmuunits allows for making it work also in sub/superscripts (alas, not in second level ones).
– egreg
Apr 21 '16 at 8:01
add a comment |
3
Another way of representing the XOR connective is by using a W-like symbol (as in p W q), also used in Set Theory to refer to disjunctive union. Since this symbol does not seem to appear in the Comprehensive LaTeX symbol list, you can create it by joining two "or" connectives together through the following command:
newcommand{xor}{%
mathbin{%
{vee}mspace{-2.9mu}nonscriptmspace{0.3mu}{vee}%
}%
}
that however doesn't work on second levels subscripts/superscripts
Full example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{xor}{%
mathbin{%
{vee}mspace{-2.9mu}nonscriptmspace{0.3mu}{vee}%
}%
}
begin{document}
$Axor B_{x xor y}$
end{document}
edited Apr 21 '16 at 7:59
egreg
714k8618983184
answered Apr 21 '16 at 1:25
Maxime Sainte-MarieMaxime Sainte-Marie
313
1
Welcome! Please provide a complete example. What definesmspace? It is not a default LaTeX command.
– cfr
Apr 21 '16 at 1:38
1
Thanks! It would still be better to give a complete example even though other answers to this question don't. Also, I'm pretty sure this can't possibly be a good way to do it, but I've up-voting anyway as I appreciate the effort ;). (It can't be right to add space like that in maths mode and shouldn't this be declared as a maths symbol?)
– cfr
Apr 21 '16 at 1:50
You're right about the example, the spaces and the symbol declaration. The command still needs some fine-tuning. Thanks for the feedback and advice!
– Maxime Sainte-Marie
Apr 21 '16 at 5:15
3
I've taken the liberty of turning your good idea into working code;DeclareMathOperatorwas not the correct tool andooaligndid nothing; usingmspaceandmuunits allows for making it work also in sub/superscripts (alas, not in second level ones).
– egreg
Apr 21 '16 at 8:01
add a comment |
3
3
3
Another way of representing the XOR connective is by using a W-like symbol (as in p W q), also used in Set Theory to refer to disjunctive union. Since this symbol does not seem to appear in the Comprehensive LaTeX symbol list, you can create it by joining two "or" connectives together through the following command:
newcommand{xor}{%
mathbin{%
{vee}mspace{-2.9mu}nonscriptmspace{0.3mu}{vee}%
}%
}
that however doesn't work on second levels subscripts/superscripts
Full example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{xor}{%
mathbin{%
{vee}mspace{-2.9mu}nonscriptmspace{0.3mu}{vee}%
}%
}
begin{document}
$Axor B_{x xor y}$
end{document}
edited Apr 21 '16 at 7:59
egreg
714k8618983184
answered Apr 21 '16 at 1:25
Maxime Sainte-MarieMaxime Sainte-Marie
313
Another way of representing the XOR connective is by using a W-like symbol (as in p W q), also used in Set Theory to refer to disjunctive union. Since this symbol does not seem to appear in the Comprehensive LaTeX symbol list, you can create it by joining two "or" connectives together through the following command:
newcommand{xor}{%
mathbin{%
{vee}mspace{-2.9mu}nonscriptmspace{0.3mu}{vee}%
}%
}
that however doesn't work on second levels subscripts/superscripts
Full example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{xor}{%
mathbin{%
{vee}mspace{-2.9mu}nonscriptmspace{0.3mu}{vee}%
}%
}
begin{document}
$Axor B_{x xor y}$
end{document}
edited Apr 21 '16 at 7:59
egreg
714k8618983184
answered Apr 21 '16 at 1:25
Maxime Sainte-MarieMaxime Sainte-Marie
313
edited Apr 21 '16 at 7:59
egreg
714k8618983184
edited Apr 21 '16 at 7:59
egreg
714k8618983184
edited Apr 21 '16 at 7:59
egreg
714k8618983184
714k8618983184
answered Apr 21 '16 at 1:25
Maxime Sainte-MarieMaxime Sainte-Marie
313
answered Apr 21 '16 at 1:25
Maxime Sainte-MarieMaxime Sainte-Marie
313
answered Apr 21 '16 at 1:25
Maxime Sainte-MarieMaxime Sainte-Marie
313
313
1
Welcome! Please provide a complete example. What definesmspace? It is not a default LaTeX command.
– cfr
Apr 21 '16 at 1:38
1
Thanks! It would still be better to give a complete example even though other answers to this question don't. Also, I'm pretty sure this can't possibly be a good way to do it, but I've up-voting anyway as I appreciate the effort ;). (It can't be right to add space like that in maths mode and shouldn't this be declared as a maths symbol?)
– cfr
Apr 21 '16 at 1:50
You're right about the example, the spaces and the symbol declaration. The command still needs some fine-tuning. Thanks for the feedback and advice!
– Maxime Sainte-Marie
Apr 21 '16 at 5:15
3
I've taken the liberty of turning your good idea into working code;DeclareMathOperatorwas not the correct tool andooaligndid nothing; usingmspaceandmuunits allows for making it work also in sub/superscripts (alas, not in second level ones).
– egreg
Apr 21 '16 at 8:01
add a comment |
1
Welcome! Please provide a complete example. What definesmspace? It is not a default LaTeX command.
– cfr
Apr 21 '16 at 1:38
1
Thanks! It would still be better to give a complete example even though other answers to this question don't. Also, I'm pretty sure this can't possibly be a good way to do it, but I've up-voting anyway as I appreciate the effort ;). (It can't be right to add space like that in maths mode and shouldn't this be declared as a maths symbol?)
– cfr
Apr 21 '16 at 1:50
You're right about the example, the spaces and the symbol declaration. The command still needs some fine-tuning. Thanks for the feedback and advice!
– Maxime Sainte-Marie
Apr 21 '16 at 5:15
3
I've taken the liberty of turning your good idea into working code;DeclareMathOperatorwas not the correct tool andooaligndid nothing; usingmspaceandmuunits allows for making it work also in sub/superscripts (alas, not in second level ones).
– egreg
Apr 21 '16 at 8:01
1
1
Welcome! Please provide a complete example. What defines
mspace? It is not a default LaTeX command.– cfr
Apr 21 '16 at 1:38
Welcome! Please provide a complete example. What defines
mspace? It is not a default LaTeX command.– cfr
Apr 21 '16 at 1:38
1
1
Thanks! It would still be better to give a complete example even though other answers to this question don't. Also, I'm pretty sure this can't possibly be a good way to do it, but I've up-voting anyway as I appreciate the effort ;). (It can't be right to add space like that in maths mode and shouldn't this be declared as a maths symbol?)
– cfr
Apr 21 '16 at 1:50
Thanks! It would still be better to give a complete example even though other answers to this question don't. Also, I'm pretty sure this can't possibly be a good way to do it, but I've up-voting anyway as I appreciate the effort ;). (It can't be right to add space like that in maths mode and shouldn't this be declared as a maths symbol?)
– cfr
Apr 21 '16 at 1:50
You're right about the example, the spaces and the symbol declaration. The command still needs some fine-tuning. Thanks for the feedback and advice!
– Maxime Sainte-Marie
Apr 21 '16 at 5:15
You're right about the example, the spaces and the symbol declaration. The command still needs some fine-tuning. Thanks for the feedback and advice!
– Maxime Sainte-Marie
Apr 21 '16 at 5:15
3
3
I've taken the liberty of turning your good idea into working code;
DeclareMathOperator was not the correct tool and ooalign did nothing; using mspace and mu units allows for making it work also in sub/superscripts (alas, not in second level ones).– egreg
Apr 21 '16 at 8:01
I've taken the liberty of turning your good idea into working code;
DeclareMathOperator was not the correct tool and ooalign did nothing; using mspace and mu units allows for making it work also in sub/superscripts (alas, not in second level ones).– egreg
Apr 21 '16 at 8:01
add a comment |
1
I use this one overline{vee}.
edited Sep 25 '12 at 21:05
Kurt
36.1k847161
answered Sep 25 '12 at 20:08
DeepakDeepak
111
add a comment |
1
I use this one overline{vee}.
edited Sep 25 '12 at 21:05
Kurt
36.1k847161
answered Sep 25 '12 at 20:08
DeepakDeepak
111
add a comment |
1
1
1
I use this one overline{vee}.
edited Sep 25 '12 at 21:05
Kurt
36.1k847161
answered Sep 25 '12 at 20:08
DeepakDeepak
111
I use this one overline{vee}.
edited Sep 25 '12 at 21:05
Kurt
36.1k847161
answered Sep 25 '12 at 20:08
DeepakDeepak
111
edited Sep 25 '12 at 21:05
Kurt
36.1k847161
edited Sep 25 '12 at 21:05
Kurt
36.1k847161
edited Sep 25 '12 at 21:05
Kurt
36.1k847161
36.1k847161
answered Sep 25 '12 at 20:08
DeepakDeepak
111
answered Sep 25 '12 at 20:08
DeepakDeepak
111
answered Sep 25 '12 at 20:08
DeepakDeepak
111
111
add a comment |
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3936%2flogic-operators-in-latex-xor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
You probably need to load some package. However,
symbolsdoes not listxor, so I can’t help you without knowing what the symbol looks like. Have a look at “How to look up a math symbol?” for ideas how you can easily find a particular symbol.– Caramdir
Oct 9 '10 at 4:07
1
Shouldn't you accept A T's answer instead of TH.'s? Since
oplusis clearly superior tomathbin{oplus}ornewcommand*xor{mathbin{oplus}}.– Eric
Feb 18 '16 at 7:51