Limit of a sequence of integrals involving continued fractions
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
The following question was asked in a calculus exam in UNI, a Peruvian university. It is meant to be for freshman calculus students.
Find $lim_{n to infty} A_n $ if
$$ A_1 = intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + sqrt{x} }, ; ; ; A_2 =
intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}} }, ; ; ; A_3 =
intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}}} },
...$$
First of all, I think this is a hard question for a midterm exam, but anyway, notice that we can calculate $A_1$ by making $t=sqrt{x}$
$$ A_1 = intlimits_0^1 frac{2 t dt }{1+t} = 2 intlimits_0^1 dt - 2 intlimits_0^1 frac{dt}{1+t}=2-2(ln2)=2-ln2^2 $$
Now, as for $A_2$ I would do $t = frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}}$ which gives $d t = frac{ dx}{2 sqrt{x} (1+sqrt{x})^2} = frac{t^2 dx}{2 (t-1)}$ thus upon sustituticion we get
$$ A_2 = - intlimits_1^{1/2} frac{2 (t-1) }{t^2(1+t) } dt $$
which can easily solved by partial fractions or so. But, apparently this is not the way this problem is meant to be solved as this exam contained 4 questions to be solved in an hour. What is the trick, if any, that can be used to solve this problem without doing the unellegant partial fractions?
calculus limits definite-integrals continued-fractions
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
The following question was asked in a calculus exam in UNI, a Peruvian university. It is meant to be for freshman calculus students.
Find $lim_{n to infty} A_n $ if
$$ A_1 = intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + sqrt{x} }, ; ; ; A_2 =
intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}} }, ; ; ; A_3 =
intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}}} },
...$$
First of all, I think this is a hard question for a midterm exam, but anyway, notice that we can calculate $A_1$ by making $t=sqrt{x}$
$$ A_1 = intlimits_0^1 frac{2 t dt }{1+t} = 2 intlimits_0^1 dt - 2 intlimits_0^1 frac{dt}{1+t}=2-2(ln2)=2-ln2^2 $$
Now, as for $A_2$ I would do $t = frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}}$ which gives $d t = frac{ dx}{2 sqrt{x} (1+sqrt{x})^2} = frac{t^2 dx}{2 (t-1)}$ thus upon sustituticion we get
$$ A_2 = - intlimits_1^{1/2} frac{2 (t-1) }{t^2(1+t) } dt $$
which can easily solved by partial fractions or so. But, apparently this is not the way this problem is meant to be solved as this exam contained 4 questions to be solved in an hour. What is the trick, if any, that can be used to solve this problem without doing the unellegant partial fractions?
calculus limits definite-integrals continued-fractions
Can you prove it is valid to change the position of $lim$ and $int$?
– Kemono Chen
yesterday
1
@Szeto: Could you post your comment as an answer (with details)? ( ̄▽ ̄)
– Tianlalu
yesterday
1
I think this is meant to be solved without that dominated convergence theorem as it is meant for first-year students.
– Jimmy Sabater
yesterday
1
@JimmySabater Although first-year students have never heard of the dominated convergence theorem, they often act as though it were obvious.
– Andreas Blass
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
The following question was asked in a calculus exam in UNI, a Peruvian university. It is meant to be for freshman calculus students.
Find $lim_{n to infty} A_n $ if
$$ A_1 = intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + sqrt{x} }, ; ; ; A_2 =
intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}} }, ; ; ; A_3 =
intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}}} },
...$$
First of all, I think this is a hard question for a midterm exam, but anyway, notice that we can calculate $A_1$ by making $t=sqrt{x}$
$$ A_1 = intlimits_0^1 frac{2 t dt }{1+t} = 2 intlimits_0^1 dt - 2 intlimits_0^1 frac{dt}{1+t}=2-2(ln2)=2-ln2^2 $$
Now, as for $A_2$ I would do $t = frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}}$ which gives $d t = frac{ dx}{2 sqrt{x} (1+sqrt{x})^2} = frac{t^2 dx}{2 (t-1)}$ thus upon sustituticion we get
$$ A_2 = - intlimits_1^{1/2} frac{2 (t-1) }{t^2(1+t) } dt $$
which can easily solved by partial fractions or so. But, apparently this is not the way this problem is meant to be solved as this exam contained 4 questions to be solved in an hour. What is the trick, if any, that can be used to solve this problem without doing the unellegant partial fractions?
calculus limits definite-integrals continued-fractions
The following question was asked in a calculus exam in UNI, a Peruvian university. It is meant to be for freshman calculus students.
Find $lim_{n to infty} A_n $ if
$$ A_1 = intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + sqrt{x} }, ; ; ; A_2 =
intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}} }, ; ; ; A_3 =
intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}}} },
...$$
First of all, I think this is a hard question for a midterm exam, but anyway, notice that we can calculate $A_1$ by making $t=sqrt{x}$
$$ A_1 = intlimits_0^1 frac{2 t dt }{1+t} = 2 intlimits_0^1 dt - 2 intlimits_0^1 frac{dt}{1+t}=2-2(ln2)=2-ln2^2 $$
Now, as for $A_2$ I would do $t = frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}}$ which gives $d t = frac{ dx}{2 sqrt{x} (1+sqrt{x})^2} = frac{t^2 dx}{2 (t-1)}$ thus upon sustituticion we get
$$ A_2 = - intlimits_1^{1/2} frac{2 (t-1) }{t^2(1+t) } dt $$
which can easily solved by partial fractions or so. But, apparently this is not the way this problem is meant to be solved as this exam contained 4 questions to be solved in an hour. What is the trick, if any, that can be used to solve this problem without doing the unellegant partial fractions?
calculus limits definite-integrals continued-fractions
calculus limits definite-integrals continued-fractions
edited yesterday
200_success
669515
669515
asked yesterday
Jimmy Sabater
1,819218
1,819218
Can you prove it is valid to change the position of $lim$ and $int$?
– Kemono Chen
yesterday
1
@Szeto: Could you post your comment as an answer (with details)? ( ̄▽ ̄)
– Tianlalu
yesterday
1
I think this is meant to be solved without that dominated convergence theorem as it is meant for first-year students.
– Jimmy Sabater
yesterday
1
@JimmySabater Although first-year students have never heard of the dominated convergence theorem, they often act as though it were obvious.
– Andreas Blass
yesterday
add a comment |
Can you prove it is valid to change the position of $lim$ and $int$?
– Kemono Chen
yesterday
1
@Szeto: Could you post your comment as an answer (with details)? ( ̄▽ ̄)
– Tianlalu
yesterday
1
I think this is meant to be solved without that dominated convergence theorem as it is meant for first-year students.
– Jimmy Sabater
yesterday
1
@JimmySabater Although first-year students have never heard of the dominated convergence theorem, they often act as though it were obvious.
– Andreas Blass
yesterday
Can you prove it is valid to change the position of $lim$ and $int$?
– Kemono Chen
yesterday
Can you prove it is valid to change the position of $lim$ and $int$?
– Kemono Chen
yesterday
1
1
@Szeto: Could you post your comment as an answer (with details)? ( ̄▽ ̄)
– Tianlalu
yesterday
@Szeto: Could you post your comment as an answer (with details)? ( ̄▽ ̄)
– Tianlalu
yesterday
1
1
I think this is meant to be solved without that dominated convergence theorem as it is meant for first-year students.
– Jimmy Sabater
yesterday
I think this is meant to be solved without that dominated convergence theorem as it is meant for first-year students.
– Jimmy Sabater
yesterday
1
1
@JimmySabater Although first-year students have never heard of the dominated convergence theorem, they often act as though it were obvious.
– Andreas Blass
yesterday
@JimmySabater Although first-year students have never heard of the dominated convergence theorem, they often act as though it were obvious.
– Andreas Blass
yesterday
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
16
down vote
accepted
As requested by the OP in a comment deleted by a moderator, switching of limit and integral sign is avoided as it requires a higher-than-expected level of knowledge for justification. Thus, a ‘simpler’ approach is presented.
By the substitution $t=sqrt x$,
$$A_n=int^1_0f_n(t^2)(2tdt)$$
$f_n(t^2)$ is of the form
$$f_n(t^2)=frac{a_n+b_nt}{c_n+d_nt}$$
We have the recurrence relation
$$a_{n+1}=c_n$$
$$b_{n+1}=d_n$$
$$c_{n+1}=a_n+c_n$$
$$d_{n+1}=b_n+d_n$$
Or
$$c_{n+1}=c_n+c_{n-1}$$
$$d_{n+1}=d_n+d_{n-1}$$
which are the Fibonacci recurrence with initial conditions
$$c_0=1, c_1=1$$
$$d_0=0, d_1=1$$
I think you can now proceed.
Also, the general term of Fibonacci sequence $0,1,1,cdots$ is
$$frac{phi^n-overlinephi^n}{sqrt5}$$ where $phi=frac{1+sqrt 5}2$.
9
It is very nice, but I believe this is a hard question to ask in a midterm for beginners. I dont think there is a more elementary solution, correct?
– Jimmy Sabater
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
25
down vote
If I were taking that exam, I'd speculate covergence and write the integrand for $A_infty$ as
$$ S_infty(x) = frac{1}{ 1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+frac{1}{ddots} }}} = frac{1}{1+S_infty(x)}$$
Solve the resulting quadratic for $S_infty^2(x) + S_infty(x) -1 = 0$ for $S_infty(x)=frac{-1+sqrt{5}}{2}$. Then we immediately have $A_infty = S_infty$.
Then, I'd sit there and wonder what they intended for me to actually show on a freshman calculus exam.
@zahbaz Is there a particular reason you choose the positive root to the quadratic equation?
– Jonathan Chiang
yesterday
@JonathanChiang Every term in the continued fraction $S_infty(x)$ is positive and all operations involve addition, so it must be positive.
– zahbaz
yesterday
@zahbaz tell that to $zeta(-1)$
– Peter
16 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
Let $A_n = intlimits_0^1 f_n(x) dx$. First show that each $f_n$ is a monotonically increasing or decreasing function in the range $[0,1]$, and hence $A_n$ lies between $f_n(0)$ and $f_n(1)$. Then note that
$f_n(0) = 1, frac{1}{2}, frac{2}{3}, frac{3}{5}, dots$
are the convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$, and $f_n(1) = f_{n+1}(0)$. So we have
$frac{1}{2} le A_1 le 1$
$frac{1}{2} le A_2 le frac{2}{3}$
$frac{3}{5} le A_3 le frac{2}{3}$
and so on.
So the sequence $A_n$ is squeezed between consecutive convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$. And so $lim_{n to infty} A_n = phi$.
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
16
down vote
accepted
As requested by the OP in a comment deleted by a moderator, switching of limit and integral sign is avoided as it requires a higher-than-expected level of knowledge for justification. Thus, a ‘simpler’ approach is presented.
By the substitution $t=sqrt x$,
$$A_n=int^1_0f_n(t^2)(2tdt)$$
$f_n(t^2)$ is of the form
$$f_n(t^2)=frac{a_n+b_nt}{c_n+d_nt}$$
We have the recurrence relation
$$a_{n+1}=c_n$$
$$b_{n+1}=d_n$$
$$c_{n+1}=a_n+c_n$$
$$d_{n+1}=b_n+d_n$$
Or
$$c_{n+1}=c_n+c_{n-1}$$
$$d_{n+1}=d_n+d_{n-1}$$
which are the Fibonacci recurrence with initial conditions
$$c_0=1, c_1=1$$
$$d_0=0, d_1=1$$
I think you can now proceed.
Also, the general term of Fibonacci sequence $0,1,1,cdots$ is
$$frac{phi^n-overlinephi^n}{sqrt5}$$ where $phi=frac{1+sqrt 5}2$.
9
It is very nice, but I believe this is a hard question to ask in a midterm for beginners. I dont think there is a more elementary solution, correct?
– Jimmy Sabater
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
16
down vote
accepted
As requested by the OP in a comment deleted by a moderator, switching of limit and integral sign is avoided as it requires a higher-than-expected level of knowledge for justification. Thus, a ‘simpler’ approach is presented.
By the substitution $t=sqrt x$,
$$A_n=int^1_0f_n(t^2)(2tdt)$$
$f_n(t^2)$ is of the form
$$f_n(t^2)=frac{a_n+b_nt}{c_n+d_nt}$$
We have the recurrence relation
$$a_{n+1}=c_n$$
$$b_{n+1}=d_n$$
$$c_{n+1}=a_n+c_n$$
$$d_{n+1}=b_n+d_n$$
Or
$$c_{n+1}=c_n+c_{n-1}$$
$$d_{n+1}=d_n+d_{n-1}$$
which are the Fibonacci recurrence with initial conditions
$$c_0=1, c_1=1$$
$$d_0=0, d_1=1$$
I think you can now proceed.
Also, the general term of Fibonacci sequence $0,1,1,cdots$ is
$$frac{phi^n-overlinephi^n}{sqrt5}$$ where $phi=frac{1+sqrt 5}2$.
9
It is very nice, but I believe this is a hard question to ask in a midterm for beginners. I dont think there is a more elementary solution, correct?
– Jimmy Sabater
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
16
down vote
accepted
up vote
16
down vote
accepted
As requested by the OP in a comment deleted by a moderator, switching of limit and integral sign is avoided as it requires a higher-than-expected level of knowledge for justification. Thus, a ‘simpler’ approach is presented.
By the substitution $t=sqrt x$,
$$A_n=int^1_0f_n(t^2)(2tdt)$$
$f_n(t^2)$ is of the form
$$f_n(t^2)=frac{a_n+b_nt}{c_n+d_nt}$$
We have the recurrence relation
$$a_{n+1}=c_n$$
$$b_{n+1}=d_n$$
$$c_{n+1}=a_n+c_n$$
$$d_{n+1}=b_n+d_n$$
Or
$$c_{n+1}=c_n+c_{n-1}$$
$$d_{n+1}=d_n+d_{n-1}$$
which are the Fibonacci recurrence with initial conditions
$$c_0=1, c_1=1$$
$$d_0=0, d_1=1$$
I think you can now proceed.
Also, the general term of Fibonacci sequence $0,1,1,cdots$ is
$$frac{phi^n-overlinephi^n}{sqrt5}$$ where $phi=frac{1+sqrt 5}2$.
As requested by the OP in a comment deleted by a moderator, switching of limit and integral sign is avoided as it requires a higher-than-expected level of knowledge for justification. Thus, a ‘simpler’ approach is presented.
By the substitution $t=sqrt x$,
$$A_n=int^1_0f_n(t^2)(2tdt)$$
$f_n(t^2)$ is of the form
$$f_n(t^2)=frac{a_n+b_nt}{c_n+d_nt}$$
We have the recurrence relation
$$a_{n+1}=c_n$$
$$b_{n+1}=d_n$$
$$c_{n+1}=a_n+c_n$$
$$d_{n+1}=b_n+d_n$$
Or
$$c_{n+1}=c_n+c_{n-1}$$
$$d_{n+1}=d_n+d_{n-1}$$
which are the Fibonacci recurrence with initial conditions
$$c_0=1, c_1=1$$
$$d_0=0, d_1=1$$
I think you can now proceed.
Also, the general term of Fibonacci sequence $0,1,1,cdots$ is
$$frac{phi^n-overlinephi^n}{sqrt5}$$ where $phi=frac{1+sqrt 5}2$.
edited 20 hours ago
answered yesterday
Szeto
6,0442726
6,0442726
9
It is very nice, but I believe this is a hard question to ask in a midterm for beginners. I dont think there is a more elementary solution, correct?
– Jimmy Sabater
yesterday
add a comment |
9
It is very nice, but I believe this is a hard question to ask in a midterm for beginners. I dont think there is a more elementary solution, correct?
– Jimmy Sabater
yesterday
9
9
It is very nice, but I believe this is a hard question to ask in a midterm for beginners. I dont think there is a more elementary solution, correct?
– Jimmy Sabater
yesterday
It is very nice, but I believe this is a hard question to ask in a midterm for beginners. I dont think there is a more elementary solution, correct?
– Jimmy Sabater
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
25
down vote
If I were taking that exam, I'd speculate covergence and write the integrand for $A_infty$ as
$$ S_infty(x) = frac{1}{ 1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+frac{1}{ddots} }}} = frac{1}{1+S_infty(x)}$$
Solve the resulting quadratic for $S_infty^2(x) + S_infty(x) -1 = 0$ for $S_infty(x)=frac{-1+sqrt{5}}{2}$. Then we immediately have $A_infty = S_infty$.
Then, I'd sit there and wonder what they intended for me to actually show on a freshman calculus exam.
@zahbaz Is there a particular reason you choose the positive root to the quadratic equation?
– Jonathan Chiang
yesterday
@JonathanChiang Every term in the continued fraction $S_infty(x)$ is positive and all operations involve addition, so it must be positive.
– zahbaz
yesterday
@zahbaz tell that to $zeta(-1)$
– Peter
16 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
25
down vote
If I were taking that exam, I'd speculate covergence and write the integrand for $A_infty$ as
$$ S_infty(x) = frac{1}{ 1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+frac{1}{ddots} }}} = frac{1}{1+S_infty(x)}$$
Solve the resulting quadratic for $S_infty^2(x) + S_infty(x) -1 = 0$ for $S_infty(x)=frac{-1+sqrt{5}}{2}$. Then we immediately have $A_infty = S_infty$.
Then, I'd sit there and wonder what they intended for me to actually show on a freshman calculus exam.
@zahbaz Is there a particular reason you choose the positive root to the quadratic equation?
– Jonathan Chiang
yesterday
@JonathanChiang Every term in the continued fraction $S_infty(x)$ is positive and all operations involve addition, so it must be positive.
– zahbaz
yesterday
@zahbaz tell that to $zeta(-1)$
– Peter
16 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
25
down vote
up vote
25
down vote
If I were taking that exam, I'd speculate covergence and write the integrand for $A_infty$ as
$$ S_infty(x) = frac{1}{ 1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+frac{1}{ddots} }}} = frac{1}{1+S_infty(x)}$$
Solve the resulting quadratic for $S_infty^2(x) + S_infty(x) -1 = 0$ for $S_infty(x)=frac{-1+sqrt{5}}{2}$. Then we immediately have $A_infty = S_infty$.
Then, I'd sit there and wonder what they intended for me to actually show on a freshman calculus exam.
If I were taking that exam, I'd speculate covergence and write the integrand for $A_infty$ as
$$ S_infty(x) = frac{1}{ 1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+frac{1}{ddots} }}} = frac{1}{1+S_infty(x)}$$
Solve the resulting quadratic for $S_infty^2(x) + S_infty(x) -1 = 0$ for $S_infty(x)=frac{-1+sqrt{5}}{2}$. Then we immediately have $A_infty = S_infty$.
Then, I'd sit there and wonder what they intended for me to actually show on a freshman calculus exam.
answered yesterday
zahbaz
8,12121937
8,12121937
@zahbaz Is there a particular reason you choose the positive root to the quadratic equation?
– Jonathan Chiang
yesterday
@JonathanChiang Every term in the continued fraction $S_infty(x)$ is positive and all operations involve addition, so it must be positive.
– zahbaz
yesterday
@zahbaz tell that to $zeta(-1)$
– Peter
16 hours ago
add a comment |
@zahbaz Is there a particular reason you choose the positive root to the quadratic equation?
– Jonathan Chiang
yesterday
@JonathanChiang Every term in the continued fraction $S_infty(x)$ is positive and all operations involve addition, so it must be positive.
– zahbaz
yesterday
@zahbaz tell that to $zeta(-1)$
– Peter
16 hours ago
@zahbaz Is there a particular reason you choose the positive root to the quadratic equation?
– Jonathan Chiang
yesterday
@zahbaz Is there a particular reason you choose the positive root to the quadratic equation?
– Jonathan Chiang
yesterday
@JonathanChiang Every term in the continued fraction $S_infty(x)$ is positive and all operations involve addition, so it must be positive.
– zahbaz
yesterday
@JonathanChiang Every term in the continued fraction $S_infty(x)$ is positive and all operations involve addition, so it must be positive.
– zahbaz
yesterday
@zahbaz tell that to $zeta(-1)$
– Peter
16 hours ago
@zahbaz tell that to $zeta(-1)$
– Peter
16 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
Let $A_n = intlimits_0^1 f_n(x) dx$. First show that each $f_n$ is a monotonically increasing or decreasing function in the range $[0,1]$, and hence $A_n$ lies between $f_n(0)$ and $f_n(1)$. Then note that
$f_n(0) = 1, frac{1}{2}, frac{2}{3}, frac{3}{5}, dots$
are the convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$, and $f_n(1) = f_{n+1}(0)$. So we have
$frac{1}{2} le A_1 le 1$
$frac{1}{2} le A_2 le frac{2}{3}$
$frac{3}{5} le A_3 le frac{2}{3}$
and so on.
So the sequence $A_n$ is squeezed between consecutive convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$. And so $lim_{n to infty} A_n = phi$.
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
Let $A_n = intlimits_0^1 f_n(x) dx$. First show that each $f_n$ is a monotonically increasing or decreasing function in the range $[0,1]$, and hence $A_n$ lies between $f_n(0)$ and $f_n(1)$. Then note that
$f_n(0) = 1, frac{1}{2}, frac{2}{3}, frac{3}{5}, dots$
are the convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$, and $f_n(1) = f_{n+1}(0)$. So we have
$frac{1}{2} le A_1 le 1$
$frac{1}{2} le A_2 le frac{2}{3}$
$frac{3}{5} le A_3 le frac{2}{3}$
and so on.
So the sequence $A_n$ is squeezed between consecutive convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$. And so $lim_{n to infty} A_n = phi$.
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
Let $A_n = intlimits_0^1 f_n(x) dx$. First show that each $f_n$ is a monotonically increasing or decreasing function in the range $[0,1]$, and hence $A_n$ lies between $f_n(0)$ and $f_n(1)$. Then note that
$f_n(0) = 1, frac{1}{2}, frac{2}{3}, frac{3}{5}, dots$
are the convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$, and $f_n(1) = f_{n+1}(0)$. So we have
$frac{1}{2} le A_1 le 1$
$frac{1}{2} le A_2 le frac{2}{3}$
$frac{3}{5} le A_3 le frac{2}{3}$
and so on.
So the sequence $A_n$ is squeezed between consecutive convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$. And so $lim_{n to infty} A_n = phi$.
Let $A_n = intlimits_0^1 f_n(x) dx$. First show that each $f_n$ is a monotonically increasing or decreasing function in the range $[0,1]$, and hence $A_n$ lies between $f_n(0)$ and $f_n(1)$. Then note that
$f_n(0) = 1, frac{1}{2}, frac{2}{3}, frac{3}{5}, dots$
are the convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$, and $f_n(1) = f_{n+1}(0)$. So we have
$frac{1}{2} le A_1 le 1$
$frac{1}{2} le A_2 le frac{2}{3}$
$frac{3}{5} le A_3 le frac{2}{3}$
and so on.
So the sequence $A_n$ is squeezed between consecutive convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$. And so $lim_{n to infty} A_n = phi$.
answered yesterday
gandalf61
7,177523
7,177523
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004575%2flimit-of-a-sequence-of-integrals-involving-continued-fractions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Can you prove it is valid to change the position of $lim$ and $int$?
– Kemono Chen
yesterday
1
@Szeto: Could you post your comment as an answer (with details)? ( ̄▽ ̄)
– Tianlalu
yesterday
1
I think this is meant to be solved without that dominated convergence theorem as it is meant for first-year students.
– Jimmy Sabater
yesterday
1
@JimmySabater Although first-year students have never heard of the dominated convergence theorem, they often act as though it were obvious.
– Andreas Blass
yesterday