Are there known zeros of the Zeta function off the line 1/2?












4














I've been doing research in information theory that had some superficial connections to the Zeta function, since I was making use of logarithms of complex numbers.



In short, we'd be looking at the Zeta function using values of s produced by powers of the logarithm function:



$zeta(log^n (-1)/x).$



I noticed several zeros for n = 6:



https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+zeta(log%5E6(-1)%2Fx),+x+from+1+to+500



But, I don't know enough about this topic to be sure that this is actually interesting, since I know that at least some of the zeros of this function are considered "trivial". Nonetheless, I thought I'd share this in case some of you found it interesting and had insights.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 3




    $zeta(-2n)=0$ are "trivial" zeros off the line $1/2$, see this post.
    – Dietrich Burde
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    There are no known zeros of $zeta(s)$ that don’t occur at a negative even integer (these are the trivial zeros) or have real part $sigma=frac12$. The Riemann Hypothesis states that any zero with real part between $0$ and $1$ will in fact have real part exactly $frac12$.
    – Clayton
    2 hours ago
















4














I've been doing research in information theory that had some superficial connections to the Zeta function, since I was making use of logarithms of complex numbers.



In short, we'd be looking at the Zeta function using values of s produced by powers of the logarithm function:



$zeta(log^n (-1)/x).$



I noticed several zeros for n = 6:



https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+zeta(log%5E6(-1)%2Fx),+x+from+1+to+500



But, I don't know enough about this topic to be sure that this is actually interesting, since I know that at least some of the zeros of this function are considered "trivial". Nonetheless, I thought I'd share this in case some of you found it interesting and had insights.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 3




    $zeta(-2n)=0$ are "trivial" zeros off the line $1/2$, see this post.
    – Dietrich Burde
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    There are no known zeros of $zeta(s)$ that don’t occur at a negative even integer (these are the trivial zeros) or have real part $sigma=frac12$. The Riemann Hypothesis states that any zero with real part between $0$ and $1$ will in fact have real part exactly $frac12$.
    – Clayton
    2 hours ago














4












4








4







I've been doing research in information theory that had some superficial connections to the Zeta function, since I was making use of logarithms of complex numbers.



In short, we'd be looking at the Zeta function using values of s produced by powers of the logarithm function:



$zeta(log^n (-1)/x).$



I noticed several zeros for n = 6:



https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+zeta(log%5E6(-1)%2Fx),+x+from+1+to+500



But, I don't know enough about this topic to be sure that this is actually interesting, since I know that at least some of the zeros of this function are considered "trivial". Nonetheless, I thought I'd share this in case some of you found it interesting and had insights.










share|cite|improve this question















I've been doing research in information theory that had some superficial connections to the Zeta function, since I was making use of logarithms of complex numbers.



In short, we'd be looking at the Zeta function using values of s produced by powers of the logarithm function:



$zeta(log^n (-1)/x).$



I noticed several zeros for n = 6:



https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+zeta(log%5E6(-1)%2Fx),+x+from+1+to+500



But, I don't know enough about this topic to be sure that this is actually interesting, since I know that at least some of the zeros of this function are considered "trivial". Nonetheless, I thought I'd share this in case some of you found it interesting and had insights.







riemann-zeta zeta-functions riemann-hypothesis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 47 mins ago

























asked 2 hours ago









Feynmanfan85

385




385








  • 3




    $zeta(-2n)=0$ are "trivial" zeros off the line $1/2$, see this post.
    – Dietrich Burde
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    There are no known zeros of $zeta(s)$ that don’t occur at a negative even integer (these are the trivial zeros) or have real part $sigma=frac12$. The Riemann Hypothesis states that any zero with real part between $0$ and $1$ will in fact have real part exactly $frac12$.
    – Clayton
    2 hours ago














  • 3




    $zeta(-2n)=0$ are "trivial" zeros off the line $1/2$, see this post.
    – Dietrich Burde
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    There are no known zeros of $zeta(s)$ that don’t occur at a negative even integer (these are the trivial zeros) or have real part $sigma=frac12$. The Riemann Hypothesis states that any zero with real part between $0$ and $1$ will in fact have real part exactly $frac12$.
    – Clayton
    2 hours ago








3




3




$zeta(-2n)=0$ are "trivial" zeros off the line $1/2$, see this post.
– Dietrich Burde
2 hours ago




$zeta(-2n)=0$ are "trivial" zeros off the line $1/2$, see this post.
– Dietrich Burde
2 hours ago




1




1




There are no known zeros of $zeta(s)$ that don’t occur at a negative even integer (these are the trivial zeros) or have real part $sigma=frac12$. The Riemann Hypothesis states that any zero with real part between $0$ and $1$ will in fact have real part exactly $frac12$.
– Clayton
2 hours ago




There are no known zeros of $zeta(s)$ that don’t occur at a negative even integer (these are the trivial zeros) or have real part $sigma=frac12$. The Riemann Hypothesis states that any zero with real part between $0$ and $1$ will in fact have real part exactly $frac12$.
– Clayton
2 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6














First of all, when plotted, only the real part of your graph crosses zero. Secondly, the only known zeroes of the zeta function off of the ${1 over 2} + atimes i$ line are the negative even integers, each of which is a zero. These are called trivial zeroes. The Riemann Hypothesis states that all other zeroes lie on that magic line. It is known that at least 40% of them lie there, and none off of it have ever been found.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks. Just fixed it.
    – William Grannis
    2 hours ago










  • Please see my update, thanks.
    – Feynmanfan85
    51 mins ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054991%2fare-there-known-zeros-of-the-zeta-function-off-the-line-1-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6














First of all, when plotted, only the real part of your graph crosses zero. Secondly, the only known zeroes of the zeta function off of the ${1 over 2} + atimes i$ line are the negative even integers, each of which is a zero. These are called trivial zeroes. The Riemann Hypothesis states that all other zeroes lie on that magic line. It is known that at least 40% of them lie there, and none off of it have ever been found.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks. Just fixed it.
    – William Grannis
    2 hours ago










  • Please see my update, thanks.
    – Feynmanfan85
    51 mins ago
















6














First of all, when plotted, only the real part of your graph crosses zero. Secondly, the only known zeroes of the zeta function off of the ${1 over 2} + atimes i$ line are the negative even integers, each of which is a zero. These are called trivial zeroes. The Riemann Hypothesis states that all other zeroes lie on that magic line. It is known that at least 40% of them lie there, and none off of it have ever been found.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks. Just fixed it.
    – William Grannis
    2 hours ago










  • Please see my update, thanks.
    – Feynmanfan85
    51 mins ago














6












6








6






First of all, when plotted, only the real part of your graph crosses zero. Secondly, the only known zeroes of the zeta function off of the ${1 over 2} + atimes i$ line are the negative even integers, each of which is a zero. These are called trivial zeroes. The Riemann Hypothesis states that all other zeroes lie on that magic line. It is known that at least 40% of them lie there, and none off of it have ever been found.






share|cite|improve this answer














First of all, when plotted, only the real part of your graph crosses zero. Secondly, the only known zeroes of the zeta function off of the ${1 over 2} + atimes i$ line are the negative even integers, each of which is a zero. These are called trivial zeroes. The Riemann Hypothesis states that all other zeroes lie on that magic line. It is known that at least 40% of them lie there, and none off of it have ever been found.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 2 hours ago









William Grannis

960519




960519












  • Thanks. Just fixed it.
    – William Grannis
    2 hours ago










  • Please see my update, thanks.
    – Feynmanfan85
    51 mins ago


















  • Thanks. Just fixed it.
    – William Grannis
    2 hours ago










  • Please see my update, thanks.
    – Feynmanfan85
    51 mins ago
















Thanks. Just fixed it.
– William Grannis
2 hours ago




Thanks. Just fixed it.
– William Grannis
2 hours ago












Please see my update, thanks.
– Feynmanfan85
51 mins ago




Please see my update, thanks.
– Feynmanfan85
51 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054991%2fare-there-known-zeros-of-the-zeta-function-off-the-line-1-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Accessing regular linux commands in Huawei's Dopra Linux

Can't connect RFCOMM socket: Host is down

Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal Exception in Interrupt