Yum repo mirror accumulates updateinfo.xml.gz files - can they be removed
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have a number of mirrors of Redhat YUM repositories, which are updated on a daily basis. The commands that are used to accomplish this are:
reposync --repoid=${i} --download_path=${destdir} --gpgcheck -l --download-metadata --downloadcomps --newest --delete
createrepo -s sha256 --checkts --update --workers=4 -g $destdir/$fn/comps.xml
The variables (i, destdir and fn) are set in the script that issues the commands. This works all very well, and the team has been using the mirrors to good effect.
The problem is that, after a year or so, one of the repositories has accumulated an impressive stack of updateinfo xml files, with names of the pattern <hash>-updateinfo.xml.gz: 456MB in the top directory and 28.45GB in the repodata subdirectory. The repository contains only 4GB of package files.
Clients that do a yum makecache on this repo end up with a 4GB repmod.xml file.
My questions are
- Why do these files accumulate, even though I have --delete
specified.. ? - Can I remove them without breaking the repository?
- Are the parameters that I use the most optimal? We want to mirror a
complete repo, but only the latest version of every package.
EDIT 4/6/2018
After deeper digging I found some more hints that these files are in fact not required.
The <hash>updateinfo.xml.gz files in the top directory in the repository are all more or less the same size, about 3.8M. The files in the repodata directory (which is created/updated by createrepo) constantly grow in size due to all files in the top directory being concatenated.
e.g.: in this repodata directory, I've got 129 gzipped files. The first file has the same average size as the ones in the top directory, the last is huge and has 129 updates tags, against the first one only 1.
# l -tr
total 29G
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3.5M Sep 28 2016 6f9c8bca09bb360b0ac2c18231168d45aa6ef51254fee7b791c6d09693677f4c-updateinfo.xml.gz
...
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 465M May 17 03:21 1696bec0516791660751bb4a319b287f2a3a5ecfee086aefb73285f07cad3ac5-updateinfo.xml.gz
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 20K May 22 12:37 ../
# gzip -dc 1696bec0516791660751bb4a319b287f2a3a5ecfee086aefb73285f07cad3ac5-updateinfo.xml.gz >updateinfo-big.xml
# gzip -dc 6f9c8bca09bb360b0ac2c18231168d45aa6ef51254fee7b791c6d09693677f4c-updateinfo.xml.gz >updateinfo.xml
# grep '<updates>' updateinfo.xml |wc -l
1
# grep '<updates>' updateinfo-big.xml |wc -l
129
# ls -1 *updateinfo.xml.gz|wc -l
129
# l updateinfo*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.4G Jun 4 17:09 updateinfo-big.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18M Jun 4 17:10 updateinfo.xml
I guess that the reposync should remove any existing updateinfo.xml.gz files in the top directory before the createrepo runs over it. The client gets the latest gzipped file from the repodata directory when it does a makecache, and unzips it.
I've moved the stack to a backup directory after posting the question above and saw no adverse effects on the clients.
yum repository mirror
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have a number of mirrors of Redhat YUM repositories, which are updated on a daily basis. The commands that are used to accomplish this are:
reposync --repoid=${i} --download_path=${destdir} --gpgcheck -l --download-metadata --downloadcomps --newest --delete
createrepo -s sha256 --checkts --update --workers=4 -g $destdir/$fn/comps.xml
The variables (i, destdir and fn) are set in the script that issues the commands. This works all very well, and the team has been using the mirrors to good effect.
The problem is that, after a year or so, one of the repositories has accumulated an impressive stack of updateinfo xml files, with names of the pattern <hash>-updateinfo.xml.gz: 456MB in the top directory and 28.45GB in the repodata subdirectory. The repository contains only 4GB of package files.
Clients that do a yum makecache on this repo end up with a 4GB repmod.xml file.
My questions are
- Why do these files accumulate, even though I have --delete
specified.. ? - Can I remove them without breaking the repository?
- Are the parameters that I use the most optimal? We want to mirror a
complete repo, but only the latest version of every package.
EDIT 4/6/2018
After deeper digging I found some more hints that these files are in fact not required.
The <hash>updateinfo.xml.gz files in the top directory in the repository are all more or less the same size, about 3.8M. The files in the repodata directory (which is created/updated by createrepo) constantly grow in size due to all files in the top directory being concatenated.
e.g.: in this repodata directory, I've got 129 gzipped files. The first file has the same average size as the ones in the top directory, the last is huge and has 129 updates tags, against the first one only 1.
# l -tr
total 29G
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3.5M Sep 28 2016 6f9c8bca09bb360b0ac2c18231168d45aa6ef51254fee7b791c6d09693677f4c-updateinfo.xml.gz
...
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 465M May 17 03:21 1696bec0516791660751bb4a319b287f2a3a5ecfee086aefb73285f07cad3ac5-updateinfo.xml.gz
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 20K May 22 12:37 ../
# gzip -dc 1696bec0516791660751bb4a319b287f2a3a5ecfee086aefb73285f07cad3ac5-updateinfo.xml.gz >updateinfo-big.xml
# gzip -dc 6f9c8bca09bb360b0ac2c18231168d45aa6ef51254fee7b791c6d09693677f4c-updateinfo.xml.gz >updateinfo.xml
# grep '<updates>' updateinfo.xml |wc -l
1
# grep '<updates>' updateinfo-big.xml |wc -l
129
# ls -1 *updateinfo.xml.gz|wc -l
129
# l updateinfo*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.4G Jun 4 17:09 updateinfo-big.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18M Jun 4 17:10 updateinfo.xml
I guess that the reposync should remove any existing updateinfo.xml.gz files in the top directory before the createrepo runs over it. The client gets the latest gzipped file from the repodata directory when it does a makecache, and unzips it.
I've moved the stack to a backup directory after posting the question above and saw no adverse effects on the clients.
yum repository mirror
I'm seeing something similar, and with similar commands. I suspect thatcreaterepo
touches the updateinfo file, and so the next reposync creates a new one. Related: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383463
– Jeff Schaller
May 17 at 19:21
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have a number of mirrors of Redhat YUM repositories, which are updated on a daily basis. The commands that are used to accomplish this are:
reposync --repoid=${i} --download_path=${destdir} --gpgcheck -l --download-metadata --downloadcomps --newest --delete
createrepo -s sha256 --checkts --update --workers=4 -g $destdir/$fn/comps.xml
The variables (i, destdir and fn) are set in the script that issues the commands. This works all very well, and the team has been using the mirrors to good effect.
The problem is that, after a year or so, one of the repositories has accumulated an impressive stack of updateinfo xml files, with names of the pattern <hash>-updateinfo.xml.gz: 456MB in the top directory and 28.45GB in the repodata subdirectory. The repository contains only 4GB of package files.
Clients that do a yum makecache on this repo end up with a 4GB repmod.xml file.
My questions are
- Why do these files accumulate, even though I have --delete
specified.. ? - Can I remove them without breaking the repository?
- Are the parameters that I use the most optimal? We want to mirror a
complete repo, but only the latest version of every package.
EDIT 4/6/2018
After deeper digging I found some more hints that these files are in fact not required.
The <hash>updateinfo.xml.gz files in the top directory in the repository are all more or less the same size, about 3.8M. The files in the repodata directory (which is created/updated by createrepo) constantly grow in size due to all files in the top directory being concatenated.
e.g.: in this repodata directory, I've got 129 gzipped files. The first file has the same average size as the ones in the top directory, the last is huge and has 129 updates tags, against the first one only 1.
# l -tr
total 29G
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3.5M Sep 28 2016 6f9c8bca09bb360b0ac2c18231168d45aa6ef51254fee7b791c6d09693677f4c-updateinfo.xml.gz
...
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 465M May 17 03:21 1696bec0516791660751bb4a319b287f2a3a5ecfee086aefb73285f07cad3ac5-updateinfo.xml.gz
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 20K May 22 12:37 ../
# gzip -dc 1696bec0516791660751bb4a319b287f2a3a5ecfee086aefb73285f07cad3ac5-updateinfo.xml.gz >updateinfo-big.xml
# gzip -dc 6f9c8bca09bb360b0ac2c18231168d45aa6ef51254fee7b791c6d09693677f4c-updateinfo.xml.gz >updateinfo.xml
# grep '<updates>' updateinfo.xml |wc -l
1
# grep '<updates>' updateinfo-big.xml |wc -l
129
# ls -1 *updateinfo.xml.gz|wc -l
129
# l updateinfo*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.4G Jun 4 17:09 updateinfo-big.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18M Jun 4 17:10 updateinfo.xml
I guess that the reposync should remove any existing updateinfo.xml.gz files in the top directory before the createrepo runs over it. The client gets the latest gzipped file from the repodata directory when it does a makecache, and unzips it.
I've moved the stack to a backup directory after posting the question above and saw no adverse effects on the clients.
yum repository mirror
I have a number of mirrors of Redhat YUM repositories, which are updated on a daily basis. The commands that are used to accomplish this are:
reposync --repoid=${i} --download_path=${destdir} --gpgcheck -l --download-metadata --downloadcomps --newest --delete
createrepo -s sha256 --checkts --update --workers=4 -g $destdir/$fn/comps.xml
The variables (i, destdir and fn) are set in the script that issues the commands. This works all very well, and the team has been using the mirrors to good effect.
The problem is that, after a year or so, one of the repositories has accumulated an impressive stack of updateinfo xml files, with names of the pattern <hash>-updateinfo.xml.gz: 456MB in the top directory and 28.45GB in the repodata subdirectory. The repository contains only 4GB of package files.
Clients that do a yum makecache on this repo end up with a 4GB repmod.xml file.
My questions are
- Why do these files accumulate, even though I have --delete
specified.. ? - Can I remove them without breaking the repository?
- Are the parameters that I use the most optimal? We want to mirror a
complete repo, but only the latest version of every package.
EDIT 4/6/2018
After deeper digging I found some more hints that these files are in fact not required.
The <hash>updateinfo.xml.gz files in the top directory in the repository are all more or less the same size, about 3.8M. The files in the repodata directory (which is created/updated by createrepo) constantly grow in size due to all files in the top directory being concatenated.
e.g.: in this repodata directory, I've got 129 gzipped files. The first file has the same average size as the ones in the top directory, the last is huge and has 129 updates tags, against the first one only 1.
# l -tr
total 29G
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3.5M Sep 28 2016 6f9c8bca09bb360b0ac2c18231168d45aa6ef51254fee7b791c6d09693677f4c-updateinfo.xml.gz
...
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 465M May 17 03:21 1696bec0516791660751bb4a319b287f2a3a5ecfee086aefb73285f07cad3ac5-updateinfo.xml.gz
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 20K May 22 12:37 ../
# gzip -dc 1696bec0516791660751bb4a319b287f2a3a5ecfee086aefb73285f07cad3ac5-updateinfo.xml.gz >updateinfo-big.xml
# gzip -dc 6f9c8bca09bb360b0ac2c18231168d45aa6ef51254fee7b791c6d09693677f4c-updateinfo.xml.gz >updateinfo.xml
# grep '<updates>' updateinfo.xml |wc -l
1
# grep '<updates>' updateinfo-big.xml |wc -l
129
# ls -1 *updateinfo.xml.gz|wc -l
129
# l updateinfo*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.4G Jun 4 17:09 updateinfo-big.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18M Jun 4 17:10 updateinfo.xml
I guess that the reposync should remove any existing updateinfo.xml.gz files in the top directory before the createrepo runs over it. The client gets the latest gzipped file from the repodata directory when it does a makecache, and unzips it.
I've moved the stack to a backup directory after posting the question above and saw no adverse effects on the clients.
yum repository mirror
yum repository mirror
edited Jun 4 at 7:54
asked May 15 at 7:07
Tony
305
305
I'm seeing something similar, and with similar commands. I suspect thatcreaterepo
touches the updateinfo file, and so the next reposync creates a new one. Related: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383463
– Jeff Schaller
May 17 at 19:21
add a comment |
I'm seeing something similar, and with similar commands. I suspect thatcreaterepo
touches the updateinfo file, and so the next reposync creates a new one. Related: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383463
– Jeff Schaller
May 17 at 19:21
I'm seeing something similar, and with similar commands. I suspect that
createrepo
touches the updateinfo file, and so the next reposync creates a new one. Related: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383463– Jeff Schaller
May 17 at 19:21
I'm seeing something similar, and with similar commands. I suspect that
createrepo
touches the updateinfo file, and so the next reposync creates a new one. Related: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383463– Jeff Schaller
May 17 at 19:21
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Answering my own question, to document this for others.
We are now practically sure that the old updateinfo.xml files are superfluous to needs. Apparently, they accumulate only because the of the hash value that is prepended to the file name. Based on this, I made some changes and now the repository remains mostly static in size.
In its original form, after the reposync and createrepo commands cited in the question, the script runs gunzip followed by a modifyrepo command which creates a new updateinfo.xml.gz file in the ../repodata directory:
if [ -n "$(/bin/ls -t $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
gunzip -c $(/bin/ls -t $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz) > $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml 2>> $LOGFILE
modifyrepo $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml $destdir/$fn/repodata >> $LOGFILE 2>&1
fi
I changed this section to:
if [ -n "$(/bin/ls -t $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
gunzip -c $(/bin/ls -tr $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz|tail -1) > $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml 2>> $LOGFILE
modifyrepo $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml $destdir/$fn/repodata >> $LOGFILE 2>&1
# clean up old update info - keeping only the 2 most recent files.
for i in $destdir/$fn $destdir/$fn/repodata; do
for j in `/bin/ls -t ${i}/*updateinfo.xml.gz|tail -n +3`; do
echo "removing security file "$(ls -l ${j}) >> $LOGFILE
/bin/rm -f ${j} >> $LOGFILE 2>&1
done
done
fi
The gunzip command only unzips the latest updateinfo.xml due to the reverse sort on the timestamp and the tail command. As a result, the new file in the repodata directory will only contain one version. The second change is to delete all older updateinfo.xml files, bar 2 (just in case).
We have been running with this version for several months and have not noticed any unwanted side effects.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Answering my own question, to document this for others.
We are now practically sure that the old updateinfo.xml files are superfluous to needs. Apparently, they accumulate only because the of the hash value that is prepended to the file name. Based on this, I made some changes and now the repository remains mostly static in size.
In its original form, after the reposync and createrepo commands cited in the question, the script runs gunzip followed by a modifyrepo command which creates a new updateinfo.xml.gz file in the ../repodata directory:
if [ -n "$(/bin/ls -t $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
gunzip -c $(/bin/ls -t $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz) > $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml 2>> $LOGFILE
modifyrepo $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml $destdir/$fn/repodata >> $LOGFILE 2>&1
fi
I changed this section to:
if [ -n "$(/bin/ls -t $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
gunzip -c $(/bin/ls -tr $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz|tail -1) > $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml 2>> $LOGFILE
modifyrepo $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml $destdir/$fn/repodata >> $LOGFILE 2>&1
# clean up old update info - keeping only the 2 most recent files.
for i in $destdir/$fn $destdir/$fn/repodata; do
for j in `/bin/ls -t ${i}/*updateinfo.xml.gz|tail -n +3`; do
echo "removing security file "$(ls -l ${j}) >> $LOGFILE
/bin/rm -f ${j} >> $LOGFILE 2>&1
done
done
fi
The gunzip command only unzips the latest updateinfo.xml due to the reverse sort on the timestamp and the tail command. As a result, the new file in the repodata directory will only contain one version. The second change is to delete all older updateinfo.xml files, bar 2 (just in case).
We have been running with this version for several months and have not noticed any unwanted side effects.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Answering my own question, to document this for others.
We are now practically sure that the old updateinfo.xml files are superfluous to needs. Apparently, they accumulate only because the of the hash value that is prepended to the file name. Based on this, I made some changes and now the repository remains mostly static in size.
In its original form, after the reposync and createrepo commands cited in the question, the script runs gunzip followed by a modifyrepo command which creates a new updateinfo.xml.gz file in the ../repodata directory:
if [ -n "$(/bin/ls -t $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
gunzip -c $(/bin/ls -t $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz) > $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml 2>> $LOGFILE
modifyrepo $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml $destdir/$fn/repodata >> $LOGFILE 2>&1
fi
I changed this section to:
if [ -n "$(/bin/ls -t $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
gunzip -c $(/bin/ls -tr $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz|tail -1) > $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml 2>> $LOGFILE
modifyrepo $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml $destdir/$fn/repodata >> $LOGFILE 2>&1
# clean up old update info - keeping only the 2 most recent files.
for i in $destdir/$fn $destdir/$fn/repodata; do
for j in `/bin/ls -t ${i}/*updateinfo.xml.gz|tail -n +3`; do
echo "removing security file "$(ls -l ${j}) >> $LOGFILE
/bin/rm -f ${j} >> $LOGFILE 2>&1
done
done
fi
The gunzip command only unzips the latest updateinfo.xml due to the reverse sort on the timestamp and the tail command. As a result, the new file in the repodata directory will only contain one version. The second change is to delete all older updateinfo.xml files, bar 2 (just in case).
We have been running with this version for several months and have not noticed any unwanted side effects.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Answering my own question, to document this for others.
We are now practically sure that the old updateinfo.xml files are superfluous to needs. Apparently, they accumulate only because the of the hash value that is prepended to the file name. Based on this, I made some changes and now the repository remains mostly static in size.
In its original form, after the reposync and createrepo commands cited in the question, the script runs gunzip followed by a modifyrepo command which creates a new updateinfo.xml.gz file in the ../repodata directory:
if [ -n "$(/bin/ls -t $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
gunzip -c $(/bin/ls -t $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz) > $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml 2>> $LOGFILE
modifyrepo $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml $destdir/$fn/repodata >> $LOGFILE 2>&1
fi
I changed this section to:
if [ -n "$(/bin/ls -t $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
gunzip -c $(/bin/ls -tr $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz|tail -1) > $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml 2>> $LOGFILE
modifyrepo $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml $destdir/$fn/repodata >> $LOGFILE 2>&1
# clean up old update info - keeping only the 2 most recent files.
for i in $destdir/$fn $destdir/$fn/repodata; do
for j in `/bin/ls -t ${i}/*updateinfo.xml.gz|tail -n +3`; do
echo "removing security file "$(ls -l ${j}) >> $LOGFILE
/bin/rm -f ${j} >> $LOGFILE 2>&1
done
done
fi
The gunzip command only unzips the latest updateinfo.xml due to the reverse sort on the timestamp and the tail command. As a result, the new file in the repodata directory will only contain one version. The second change is to delete all older updateinfo.xml files, bar 2 (just in case).
We have been running with this version for several months and have not noticed any unwanted side effects.
Answering my own question, to document this for others.
We are now practically sure that the old updateinfo.xml files are superfluous to needs. Apparently, they accumulate only because the of the hash value that is prepended to the file name. Based on this, I made some changes and now the repository remains mostly static in size.
In its original form, after the reposync and createrepo commands cited in the question, the script runs gunzip followed by a modifyrepo command which creates a new updateinfo.xml.gz file in the ../repodata directory:
if [ -n "$(/bin/ls -t $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
gunzip -c $(/bin/ls -t $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz) > $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml 2>> $LOGFILE
modifyrepo $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml $destdir/$fn/repodata >> $LOGFILE 2>&1
fi
I changed this section to:
if [ -n "$(/bin/ls -t $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
gunzip -c $(/bin/ls -tr $destdir/$fn/*updateinfo.xml.gz|tail -1) > $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml 2>> $LOGFILE
modifyrepo $destdir/$fn/updateinfo.xml $destdir/$fn/repodata >> $LOGFILE 2>&1
# clean up old update info - keeping only the 2 most recent files.
for i in $destdir/$fn $destdir/$fn/repodata; do
for j in `/bin/ls -t ${i}/*updateinfo.xml.gz|tail -n +3`; do
echo "removing security file "$(ls -l ${j}) >> $LOGFILE
/bin/rm -f ${j} >> $LOGFILE 2>&1
done
done
fi
The gunzip command only unzips the latest updateinfo.xml due to the reverse sort on the timestamp and the tail command. As a result, the new file in the repodata directory will only contain one version. The second change is to delete all older updateinfo.xml files, bar 2 (just in case).
We have been running with this version for several months and have not noticed any unwanted side effects.
answered Nov 29 at 2:07
Tony
305
305
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f443863%2fyum-repo-mirror-accumulates-updateinfo-xml-gz-files-can-they-be-removed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I'm seeing something similar, and with similar commands. I suspect that
createrepo
touches the updateinfo file, and so the next reposync creates a new one. Related: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383463– Jeff Schaller
May 17 at 19:21