Does the Mind Blade count as a magic weapon in the hands of someone other than its intended wielder?
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
In Volo's Guide to Monsters (pg. 81), the mind blade weapon is described:
Mind Blade
Weapon (any sword), rare (requires attunement by a specific individual)
Mind flayers can turn any nonmagical sword into a mind blade. Only one creature can attune to it: either a specific mind flayer or one of its thralls. In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind. In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon that deals an extra 2d6 psychic damage to any target it hits.
I have emphasised "In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade" and "In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon".
My question is: would the mind blade count as a magical weapon (or at least, does the slashing or piercing damage it does count as magical damage) for the purposes of overcoming damage resistances in the hands of someone other than its intended wielder?
Ordinarily I would assume yes, since a magic weapon is still a magic weapon even if you haven't attuned to it. But given that it specifically calls out the fact the it's a "normal blade" in the hands of someone it's not intended for, and that it's a "magic weapon" in the hands of its intended wielder, it makes me doubt my default assumption. Also that it's gone out of its way to describe something outside of the usual language of attunement (i.e. it could have said "while attuned" or similar like the descriptions of many other magic items do, but instead it defines an "intended wielder").
Obviously either way the not-intended wielder cannot attune to it or deal psychic damage with it; this is just about it being a magical weapon for the purposes of overcoming damage resistance.
dnd-5e magic-items weapons
edited yesterday
V2Blast
18.1k248114
asked yesterday
NathanS
19.9k686210
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
In Volo's Guide to Monsters (pg. 81), the mind blade weapon is described:
Mind Blade
Weapon (any sword), rare (requires attunement by a specific individual)
Mind flayers can turn any nonmagical sword into a mind blade. Only one creature can attune to it: either a specific mind flayer or one of its thralls. In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind. In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon that deals an extra 2d6 psychic damage to any target it hits.
I have emphasised "In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade" and "In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon".
My question is: would the mind blade count as a magical weapon (or at least, does the slashing or piercing damage it does count as magical damage) for the purposes of overcoming damage resistances in the hands of someone other than its intended wielder?
Ordinarily I would assume yes, since a magic weapon is still a magic weapon even if you haven't attuned to it. But given that it specifically calls out the fact the it's a "normal blade" in the hands of someone it's not intended for, and that it's a "magic weapon" in the hands of its intended wielder, it makes me doubt my default assumption. Also that it's gone out of its way to describe something outside of the usual language of attunement (i.e. it could have said "while attuned" or similar like the descriptions of many other magic items do, but instead it defines an "intended wielder").
Obviously either way the not-intended wielder cannot attune to it or deal psychic damage with it; this is just about it being a magical weapon for the purposes of overcoming damage resistance.
dnd-5e magic-items weapons
edited yesterday
V2Blast
18.1k248114
asked yesterday
NathanS
19.9k686210
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
In Volo's Guide to Monsters (pg. 81), the mind blade weapon is described:
Mind Blade
Weapon (any sword), rare (requires attunement by a specific individual)
Mind flayers can turn any nonmagical sword into a mind blade. Only one creature can attune to it: either a specific mind flayer or one of its thralls. In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind. In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon that deals an extra 2d6 psychic damage to any target it hits.
I have emphasised "In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade" and "In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon".
My question is: would the mind blade count as a magical weapon (or at least, does the slashing or piercing damage it does count as magical damage) for the purposes of overcoming damage resistances in the hands of someone other than its intended wielder?
Ordinarily I would assume yes, since a magic weapon is still a magic weapon even if you haven't attuned to it. But given that it specifically calls out the fact the it's a "normal blade" in the hands of someone it's not intended for, and that it's a "magic weapon" in the hands of its intended wielder, it makes me doubt my default assumption. Also that it's gone out of its way to describe something outside of the usual language of attunement (i.e. it could have said "while attuned" or similar like the descriptions of many other magic items do, but instead it defines an "intended wielder").
Obviously either way the not-intended wielder cannot attune to it or deal psychic damage with it; this is just about it being a magical weapon for the purposes of overcoming damage resistance.
dnd-5e magic-items weapons
edited yesterday
V2Blast
18.1k248114
asked yesterday
NathanS
19.9k686210
In Volo's Guide to Monsters (pg. 81), the mind blade weapon is described:
Mind Blade
Weapon (any sword), rare (requires attunement by a specific individual)
Mind flayers can turn any nonmagical sword into a mind blade. Only one creature can attune to it: either a specific mind flayer or one of its thralls. In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind. In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon that deals an extra 2d6 psychic damage to any target it hits.
I have emphasised "In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade" and "In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon".
My question is: would the mind blade count as a magical weapon (or at least, does the slashing or piercing damage it does count as magical damage) for the purposes of overcoming damage resistances in the hands of someone other than its intended wielder?
Ordinarily I would assume yes, since a magic weapon is still a magic weapon even if you haven't attuned to it. But given that it specifically calls out the fact the it's a "normal blade" in the hands of someone it's not intended for, and that it's a "magic weapon" in the hands of its intended wielder, it makes me doubt my default assumption. Also that it's gone out of its way to describe something outside of the usual language of attunement (i.e. it could have said "while attuned" or similar like the descriptions of many other magic items do, but instead it defines an "intended wielder").
Obviously either way the not-intended wielder cannot attune to it or deal psychic damage with it; this is just about it being a magical weapon for the purposes of overcoming damage resistance.
dnd-5e magic-items weapons
dnd-5e magic-items weapons
edited yesterday
V2Blast
18.1k248114
asked yesterday
NathanS
19.9k686210
edited yesterday
V2Blast
18.1k248114
asked yesterday
NathanS
19.9k686210
edited yesterday
V2Blast
18.1k248114
edited yesterday
V2Blast
18.1k248114
edited yesterday
V2Blast
18.1k248114
18.1k248114
asked yesterday
NathanS
19.9k686210
asked yesterday
NathanS
19.9k686210
asked yesterday
NathanS
19.9k686210
19.9k686210
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
15
down vote
accepted
No, because that would be to "function" as a magic weapon, which it explicitly lacks the ability to do
The key (as I see it) is parsing the word "function."
Generally, the function of something is its capacity to act or behave in a certain manner, or to have a certain purpose. So an item's ability to be used in combat so as to overcome any specific resistance is certainly a "function" in the ordinary sense of that word.
Thus whenever the sword "functions as a normal (not magic) blade" then it lacks the functions that are associated specifically with magic ones, including the function you are asking about.
answered yesterday
Valley Lad
1,140317
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
No it does not
As you already emphasis in the question:
In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind.
In other words it is not magical or special in any way. This is further emphasized by the sentence coming after it:
In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon
edited yesterday
NathanS
19.9k686210
answered yesterday
Dinomaster
2,149420
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
15
down vote
accepted
No, because that would be to "function" as a magic weapon, which it explicitly lacks the ability to do
The key (as I see it) is parsing the word "function."
Generally, the function of something is its capacity to act or behave in a certain manner, or to have a certain purpose. So an item's ability to be used in combat so as to overcome any specific resistance is certainly a "function" in the ordinary sense of that word.
Thus whenever the sword "functions as a normal (not magic) blade" then it lacks the functions that are associated specifically with magic ones, including the function you are asking about.
answered yesterday
Valley Lad
1,140317
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
accepted
No, because that would be to "function" as a magic weapon, which it explicitly lacks the ability to do
The key (as I see it) is parsing the word "function."
Generally, the function of something is its capacity to act or behave in a certain manner, or to have a certain purpose. So an item's ability to be used in combat so as to overcome any specific resistance is certainly a "function" in the ordinary sense of that word.
Thus whenever the sword "functions as a normal (not magic) blade" then it lacks the functions that are associated specifically with magic ones, including the function you are asking about.
answered yesterday
Valley Lad
1,140317
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
accepted
up vote
15
down vote
accepted
No, because that would be to "function" as a magic weapon, which it explicitly lacks the ability to do
The key (as I see it) is parsing the word "function."
Generally, the function of something is its capacity to act or behave in a certain manner, or to have a certain purpose. So an item's ability to be used in combat so as to overcome any specific resistance is certainly a "function" in the ordinary sense of that word.
Thus whenever the sword "functions as a normal (not magic) blade" then it lacks the functions that are associated specifically with magic ones, including the function you are asking about.
answered yesterday
Valley Lad
1,140317
No, because that would be to "function" as a magic weapon, which it explicitly lacks the ability to do
The key (as I see it) is parsing the word "function."
Generally, the function of something is its capacity to act or behave in a certain manner, or to have a certain purpose. So an item's ability to be used in combat so as to overcome any specific resistance is certainly a "function" in the ordinary sense of that word.
Thus whenever the sword "functions as a normal (not magic) blade" then it lacks the functions that are associated specifically with magic ones, including the function you are asking about.
answered yesterday
Valley Lad
1,140317
answered yesterday
Valley Lad
1,140317
answered yesterday
Valley Lad
1,140317
answered yesterday
Valley Lad
1,140317
1,140317
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
No it does not
As you already emphasis in the question:
In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind.
In other words it is not magical or special in any way. This is further emphasized by the sentence coming after it:
In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon
edited yesterday
NathanS
19.9k686210
answered yesterday
Dinomaster
2,149420
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
No it does not
As you already emphasis in the question:
In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind.
In other words it is not magical or special in any way. This is further emphasized by the sentence coming after it:
In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon
edited yesterday
NathanS
19.9k686210
answered yesterday
Dinomaster
2,149420
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
No it does not
As you already emphasis in the question:
In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind.
In other words it is not magical or special in any way. This is further emphasized by the sentence coming after it:
In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon
edited yesterday
NathanS
19.9k686210
answered yesterday
Dinomaster
2,149420
No it does not
As you already emphasis in the question:
In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind.
In other words it is not magical or special in any way. This is further emphasized by the sentence coming after it:
In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon
edited yesterday
NathanS
19.9k686210
answered yesterday
Dinomaster
2,149420
edited yesterday
NathanS
19.9k686210
edited yesterday
NathanS
19.9k686210
edited yesterday
NathanS
19.9k686210
19.9k686210
answered yesterday
Dinomaster
2,149420
answered yesterday
Dinomaster
2,149420
answered yesterday
Dinomaster
2,149420
2,149420
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136000%2fdoes-the-mind-blade-count-as-a-magic-weapon-in-the-hands-of-someone-other-than-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
