Comparison: ShareLaTeX vs Overleaf (formerly WriteLaTeX)
up vote
103
down vote
favorite
So far, I didn't have the chance to use either of these services. Before starting, I would like to hear your opinions. What are the advantages and disadvantages? Why should I choose one over the other? I am mainly interested in the technical side, but I would also love to hear comments also regarding the plans and prices.
online sharelatex overleaf
|
show 12 more comments
up vote
103
down vote
favorite
So far, I didn't have the chance to use either of these services. Before starting, I would like to hear your opinions. What are the advantages and disadvantages? Why should I choose one over the other? I am mainly interested in the technical side, but I would also love to hear comments also regarding the plans and prices.
online sharelatex overleaf
6
@Jubobs if a complete free no-registration service exists, it would be nice for people doing a LaTeX course as it avoids having to explain to students how to install a distribution on their own, if any, computers, for homework, alongside work at school.
– jfbu
May 19 '14 at 12:42
5
I may lose some reputation here by saying this, but... WriteLatex has a pseudo-WYSIGYG option which can help some new/eventual LaTeX users...
– Andrestand
Jun 25 '14 at 7:15
6
This poster may be a useful overview: academia.edu/3471054/…
– crsh
Jul 30 '14 at 15:45
4
One interesting vantage point of ShareLaTeX over WriteLaTeX is that the former is free and open source software and can be customized and deployed locally if the users wishes so.
– Giovanni Mascellani
Dec 16 '14 at 15:45
5
sharelatex and overleaf just merged overleaf.com/blog/…
– KlingonJoe
Jul 20 '17 at 23:57
|
show 12 more comments
up vote
103
down vote
favorite
up vote
103
down vote
favorite
So far, I didn't have the chance to use either of these services. Before starting, I would like to hear your opinions. What are the advantages and disadvantages? Why should I choose one over the other? I am mainly interested in the technical side, but I would also love to hear comments also regarding the plans and prices.
online sharelatex overleaf
So far, I didn't have the chance to use either of these services. Before starting, I would like to hear your opinions. What are the advantages and disadvantages? Why should I choose one over the other? I am mainly interested in the technical side, but I would also love to hear comments also regarding the plans and prices.
online sharelatex overleaf
online sharelatex overleaf
edited Oct 31 '17 at 17:12
Malcolm
1054
1054
asked May 19 '14 at 9:28
Dror
11k1772150
11k1772150
6
@Jubobs if a complete free no-registration service exists, it would be nice for people doing a LaTeX course as it avoids having to explain to students how to install a distribution on their own, if any, computers, for homework, alongside work at school.
– jfbu
May 19 '14 at 12:42
5
I may lose some reputation here by saying this, but... WriteLatex has a pseudo-WYSIGYG option which can help some new/eventual LaTeX users...
– Andrestand
Jun 25 '14 at 7:15
6
This poster may be a useful overview: academia.edu/3471054/…
– crsh
Jul 30 '14 at 15:45
4
One interesting vantage point of ShareLaTeX over WriteLaTeX is that the former is free and open source software and can be customized and deployed locally if the users wishes so.
– Giovanni Mascellani
Dec 16 '14 at 15:45
5
sharelatex and overleaf just merged overleaf.com/blog/…
– KlingonJoe
Jul 20 '17 at 23:57
|
show 12 more comments
6
@Jubobs if a complete free no-registration service exists, it would be nice for people doing a LaTeX course as it avoids having to explain to students how to install a distribution on their own, if any, computers, for homework, alongside work at school.
– jfbu
May 19 '14 at 12:42
5
I may lose some reputation here by saying this, but... WriteLatex has a pseudo-WYSIGYG option which can help some new/eventual LaTeX users...
– Andrestand
Jun 25 '14 at 7:15
6
This poster may be a useful overview: academia.edu/3471054/…
– crsh
Jul 30 '14 at 15:45
4
One interesting vantage point of ShareLaTeX over WriteLaTeX is that the former is free and open source software and can be customized and deployed locally if the users wishes so.
– Giovanni Mascellani
Dec 16 '14 at 15:45
5
sharelatex and overleaf just merged overleaf.com/blog/…
– KlingonJoe
Jul 20 '17 at 23:57
6
6
@Jubobs if a complete free no-registration service exists, it would be nice for people doing a LaTeX course as it avoids having to explain to students how to install a distribution on their own, if any, computers, for homework, alongside work at school.
– jfbu
May 19 '14 at 12:42
@Jubobs if a complete free no-registration service exists, it would be nice for people doing a LaTeX course as it avoids having to explain to students how to install a distribution on their own, if any, computers, for homework, alongside work at school.
– jfbu
May 19 '14 at 12:42
5
5
I may lose some reputation here by saying this, but... WriteLatex has a pseudo-WYSIGYG option which can help some new/eventual LaTeX users...
– Andrestand
Jun 25 '14 at 7:15
I may lose some reputation here by saying this, but... WriteLatex has a pseudo-WYSIGYG option which can help some new/eventual LaTeX users...
– Andrestand
Jun 25 '14 at 7:15
6
6
This poster may be a useful overview: academia.edu/3471054/…
– crsh
Jul 30 '14 at 15:45
This poster may be a useful overview: academia.edu/3471054/…
– crsh
Jul 30 '14 at 15:45
4
4
One interesting vantage point of ShareLaTeX over WriteLaTeX is that the former is free and open source software and can be customized and deployed locally if the users wishes so.
– Giovanni Mascellani
Dec 16 '14 at 15:45
One interesting vantage point of ShareLaTeX over WriteLaTeX is that the former is free and open source software and can be customized and deployed locally if the users wishes so.
– Giovanni Mascellani
Dec 16 '14 at 15:45
5
5
sharelatex and overleaf just merged overleaf.com/blog/…
– KlingonJoe
Jul 20 '17 at 23:57
sharelatex and overleaf just merged overleaf.com/blog/…
– KlingonJoe
Jul 20 '17 at 23:57
|
show 12 more comments
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
up vote
57
down vote
I have used the free versions of both.
I started out with Overleaf (formerly WriteLaTeX) since when I first started learning LaTeX, it was the first Google result.
["I find it nice since it auto-compiles, but that also is annoying
since if you do not type fast enough, it will compile, even if you are
in the middle of an environment that you haven't closed yet. It will
then spit out errors"] There is an option to disable the auto compiler of the preview.
. Still, it has find and replace, a rich text editor, tags for projects, and a large library of templates (that I haven't used). The free version comes with 1GB of storage, unlimited projects and collaborators, and a basic save and restore history. Paid versions include save to Dropbox, spellcheck (it is disabled in free), autocomplete, version comparing, priority support, access control (otherwise anyone with the link can edit), and full version history (coming soon).
ShareLaTeX is also good. The free version has a spell checker, autocomplete, and it saves the code to a private Github repo. The paid versions include access to version history, unlimited projects, and sync to Dropbox. The project organization is somewhat worse than Overleaf; ShareLaTeX only has folders. I suggested several improvements that the developers said they would get back too, so project management should be improved in the future. The autocomplete is fuzzy, which means that beeq
matches begin{equation}
which allows for faster completion. It also automatically adds the end when you do that too.In addition, ShareLaTeX is completely open source; it has a Github repo with all of the code including the LaTeX compiler.
All in all, I believe that ShareLaTeX is better than Overleaf (formerly WriteLaTeX) because of the slightly better feature set.
@Paul Thanks for updating it.
– 0az
Apr 19 '15 at 19:28
@alphadelta you're welcome, my edit was prompted by a (now deleted) answer for Overleaf and I figured we could just update this one. I don't use either service, so if any capabilities have changed since you wrote the answer, feel free to update it. Cheers!
– Paul Gessler
Apr 19 '15 at 19:31
2
And updated to reflect my revised opinion after using ShareLaTeX for a while.
– 0az
Apr 20 '15 at 22:16
It seems Overleaf now has only 100MB free (I still prefer it though).
– Mark
Jun 18 '15 at 21:22
ShareLaTeX misses git support: github.com/sharelatex/sharelatex/issues/10
– koppor
Sep 10 '15 at 10:21
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
27
down vote
I've also tried both. WriteLaTeX (now Overleaf) is a bit prettier, but in the end I prefer ShareLaTeX for these reasons:
- It compiles faster
- Autocomplete is more robust: it works with package and custom commands
- It doesn't spawn multiple browser windows/tabs like Overleaf
- Ctrl-C and Ctrl-V work in vim mode, this doesn't work in Overleaf
- It's really easy to access the compiled pdf, it is just https://www.sharelatex.com/project/[project_id]/output/output.pdf
- You can zoom into the preview, and click url{} links the preview. You can't in Overleaf, this is a showstopper for Overleaf for me.
The only things I miss from Overleaf are autocompile and better editor/preview position sync.
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
An interesting property of Overleaf not mentioned here yet, is the fact that the free version supports Git. It is possible to clone your project to your computer, work on it offline, commit your changes, pull new changes, etc.
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
One of the main differences I saw is in the use of BibTeX: Overleaf gives you popup access to a search windows when typing citep{}
, making easy to find the key you want to use, while ShareLaTeX does nothing.
edit: ShareLaTeX has just added this feature too, see: https://www.sharelatex.com/blog/2016/02/09/word-count.html
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
I totally love the RTF (Rich Text)mood of Overleaf. I don't like the online stuff; but, I am sold because of it. Writing with the neat window is much attractive than swimming inside a Latex code. The code blurs, obstructs the content in the usual Latex editor---The RTF mood removed the obstruction without minimizing the power of the latex: LYX does simplify the editing under the price of losing full control.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
I have tried only Overleaf. Brief word about my profile: I am a scientist (astrophysicist), use three different computers, and mostly mac user but do heavy computing with linux.
Whenever I have an internet connection, I use overleaf instead of a local editor and here is why:
- automatic updating and preview of final document in the right side of the screen
- support for git versioning: you can easily add files locally and push to the cloud using git (you can keep a github repo if you want and sync with overleaf)
- awesome syntax highlighting for latex (the best I’ve seen)
- no hassle about installing common latex packages
- lots and lots of templates for all kinds of documents and scientific journals
- can save tagged versions of the document (similar to LibreOffice versions)
- and of course: support for collaborative editing (a la google docs)
It has some other features which I do not really care about, but might be useful for some users:
- support for rich text format if you are not a fan of latex syntax
- works in your smartphone (tested on iOS)
I tested Overleaf on Safari and Chrome; Macbook and Chromebook. Works like a charm.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
One thing I like about overleaf, is that it lets you download your bibliography directly from Zotero (so you can just click refresh, rather than export a bib file from your computer then upload it).
Major drawback: they import your ENTIRE zotero library. Mine has grown to be quite large (overleaf's bib file is 1.5M) - not a show stopper but unnecessary bloat for the project and it took a while to download and it doesn't update as I add things to zotero.
– drevicko
Aug 23 '17 at 10:19
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
I preferred ShareLaTeX because the documents are private.
In free Overleaf, whoever has the document url can edit.
5
Welcome to the site! Note that you can get Read only-links for Overleaf projects.
– Torbjørn T.
Nov 15 '16 at 15:52
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Just a quick note that ShareLaTeX and Overleaf have now merged into the new Overleaf v2 platform on 4th September 2018. All previous features from ShareLaTeX and Overleaf are/will be retained (or re-implemented) in v2, including most mentioned on this page.
add a comment |
protected by Joseph Wright♦ Apr 5 '17 at 18:02
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
57
down vote
I have used the free versions of both.
I started out with Overleaf (formerly WriteLaTeX) since when I first started learning LaTeX, it was the first Google result.
["I find it nice since it auto-compiles, but that also is annoying
since if you do not type fast enough, it will compile, even if you are
in the middle of an environment that you haven't closed yet. It will
then spit out errors"] There is an option to disable the auto compiler of the preview.
. Still, it has find and replace, a rich text editor, tags for projects, and a large library of templates (that I haven't used). The free version comes with 1GB of storage, unlimited projects and collaborators, and a basic save and restore history. Paid versions include save to Dropbox, spellcheck (it is disabled in free), autocomplete, version comparing, priority support, access control (otherwise anyone with the link can edit), and full version history (coming soon).
ShareLaTeX is also good. The free version has a spell checker, autocomplete, and it saves the code to a private Github repo. The paid versions include access to version history, unlimited projects, and sync to Dropbox. The project organization is somewhat worse than Overleaf; ShareLaTeX only has folders. I suggested several improvements that the developers said they would get back too, so project management should be improved in the future. The autocomplete is fuzzy, which means that beeq
matches begin{equation}
which allows for faster completion. It also automatically adds the end when you do that too.In addition, ShareLaTeX is completely open source; it has a Github repo with all of the code including the LaTeX compiler.
All in all, I believe that ShareLaTeX is better than Overleaf (formerly WriteLaTeX) because of the slightly better feature set.
@Paul Thanks for updating it.
– 0az
Apr 19 '15 at 19:28
@alphadelta you're welcome, my edit was prompted by a (now deleted) answer for Overleaf and I figured we could just update this one. I don't use either service, so if any capabilities have changed since you wrote the answer, feel free to update it. Cheers!
– Paul Gessler
Apr 19 '15 at 19:31
2
And updated to reflect my revised opinion after using ShareLaTeX for a while.
– 0az
Apr 20 '15 at 22:16
It seems Overleaf now has only 100MB free (I still prefer it though).
– Mark
Jun 18 '15 at 21:22
ShareLaTeX misses git support: github.com/sharelatex/sharelatex/issues/10
– koppor
Sep 10 '15 at 10:21
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
57
down vote
I have used the free versions of both.
I started out with Overleaf (formerly WriteLaTeX) since when I first started learning LaTeX, it was the first Google result.
["I find it nice since it auto-compiles, but that also is annoying
since if you do not type fast enough, it will compile, even if you are
in the middle of an environment that you haven't closed yet. It will
then spit out errors"] There is an option to disable the auto compiler of the preview.
. Still, it has find and replace, a rich text editor, tags for projects, and a large library of templates (that I haven't used). The free version comes with 1GB of storage, unlimited projects and collaborators, and a basic save and restore history. Paid versions include save to Dropbox, spellcheck (it is disabled in free), autocomplete, version comparing, priority support, access control (otherwise anyone with the link can edit), and full version history (coming soon).
ShareLaTeX is also good. The free version has a spell checker, autocomplete, and it saves the code to a private Github repo. The paid versions include access to version history, unlimited projects, and sync to Dropbox. The project organization is somewhat worse than Overleaf; ShareLaTeX only has folders. I suggested several improvements that the developers said they would get back too, so project management should be improved in the future. The autocomplete is fuzzy, which means that beeq
matches begin{equation}
which allows for faster completion. It also automatically adds the end when you do that too.In addition, ShareLaTeX is completely open source; it has a Github repo with all of the code including the LaTeX compiler.
All in all, I believe that ShareLaTeX is better than Overleaf (formerly WriteLaTeX) because of the slightly better feature set.
@Paul Thanks for updating it.
– 0az
Apr 19 '15 at 19:28
@alphadelta you're welcome, my edit was prompted by a (now deleted) answer for Overleaf and I figured we could just update this one. I don't use either service, so if any capabilities have changed since you wrote the answer, feel free to update it. Cheers!
– Paul Gessler
Apr 19 '15 at 19:31
2
And updated to reflect my revised opinion after using ShareLaTeX for a while.
– 0az
Apr 20 '15 at 22:16
It seems Overleaf now has only 100MB free (I still prefer it though).
– Mark
Jun 18 '15 at 21:22
ShareLaTeX misses git support: github.com/sharelatex/sharelatex/issues/10
– koppor
Sep 10 '15 at 10:21
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
57
down vote
up vote
57
down vote
I have used the free versions of both.
I started out with Overleaf (formerly WriteLaTeX) since when I first started learning LaTeX, it was the first Google result.
["I find it nice since it auto-compiles, but that also is annoying
since if you do not type fast enough, it will compile, even if you are
in the middle of an environment that you haven't closed yet. It will
then spit out errors"] There is an option to disable the auto compiler of the preview.
. Still, it has find and replace, a rich text editor, tags for projects, and a large library of templates (that I haven't used). The free version comes with 1GB of storage, unlimited projects and collaborators, and a basic save and restore history. Paid versions include save to Dropbox, spellcheck (it is disabled in free), autocomplete, version comparing, priority support, access control (otherwise anyone with the link can edit), and full version history (coming soon).
ShareLaTeX is also good. The free version has a spell checker, autocomplete, and it saves the code to a private Github repo. The paid versions include access to version history, unlimited projects, and sync to Dropbox. The project organization is somewhat worse than Overleaf; ShareLaTeX only has folders. I suggested several improvements that the developers said they would get back too, so project management should be improved in the future. The autocomplete is fuzzy, which means that beeq
matches begin{equation}
which allows for faster completion. It also automatically adds the end when you do that too.In addition, ShareLaTeX is completely open source; it has a Github repo with all of the code including the LaTeX compiler.
All in all, I believe that ShareLaTeX is better than Overleaf (formerly WriteLaTeX) because of the slightly better feature set.
I have used the free versions of both.
I started out with Overleaf (formerly WriteLaTeX) since when I first started learning LaTeX, it was the first Google result.
["I find it nice since it auto-compiles, but that also is annoying
since if you do not type fast enough, it will compile, even if you are
in the middle of an environment that you haven't closed yet. It will
then spit out errors"] There is an option to disable the auto compiler of the preview.
. Still, it has find and replace, a rich text editor, tags for projects, and a large library of templates (that I haven't used). The free version comes with 1GB of storage, unlimited projects and collaborators, and a basic save and restore history. Paid versions include save to Dropbox, spellcheck (it is disabled in free), autocomplete, version comparing, priority support, access control (otherwise anyone with the link can edit), and full version history (coming soon).
ShareLaTeX is also good. The free version has a spell checker, autocomplete, and it saves the code to a private Github repo. The paid versions include access to version history, unlimited projects, and sync to Dropbox. The project organization is somewhat worse than Overleaf; ShareLaTeX only has folders. I suggested several improvements that the developers said they would get back too, so project management should be improved in the future. The autocomplete is fuzzy, which means that beeq
matches begin{equation}
which allows for faster completion. It also automatically adds the end when you do that too.In addition, ShareLaTeX is completely open source; it has a Github repo with all of the code including the LaTeX compiler.
All in all, I believe that ShareLaTeX is better than Overleaf (formerly WriteLaTeX) because of the slightly better feature set.
edited Sep 5 '16 at 16:29
Glauco Leme
33
33
answered Sep 17 '14 at 1:22
0az
662614
662614
@Paul Thanks for updating it.
– 0az
Apr 19 '15 at 19:28
@alphadelta you're welcome, my edit was prompted by a (now deleted) answer for Overleaf and I figured we could just update this one. I don't use either service, so if any capabilities have changed since you wrote the answer, feel free to update it. Cheers!
– Paul Gessler
Apr 19 '15 at 19:31
2
And updated to reflect my revised opinion after using ShareLaTeX for a while.
– 0az
Apr 20 '15 at 22:16
It seems Overleaf now has only 100MB free (I still prefer it though).
– Mark
Jun 18 '15 at 21:22
ShareLaTeX misses git support: github.com/sharelatex/sharelatex/issues/10
– koppor
Sep 10 '15 at 10:21
|
show 2 more comments
@Paul Thanks for updating it.
– 0az
Apr 19 '15 at 19:28
@alphadelta you're welcome, my edit was prompted by a (now deleted) answer for Overleaf and I figured we could just update this one. I don't use either service, so if any capabilities have changed since you wrote the answer, feel free to update it. Cheers!
– Paul Gessler
Apr 19 '15 at 19:31
2
And updated to reflect my revised opinion after using ShareLaTeX for a while.
– 0az
Apr 20 '15 at 22:16
It seems Overleaf now has only 100MB free (I still prefer it though).
– Mark
Jun 18 '15 at 21:22
ShareLaTeX misses git support: github.com/sharelatex/sharelatex/issues/10
– koppor
Sep 10 '15 at 10:21
@Paul Thanks for updating it.
– 0az
Apr 19 '15 at 19:28
@Paul Thanks for updating it.
– 0az
Apr 19 '15 at 19:28
@alphadelta you're welcome, my edit was prompted by a (now deleted) answer for Overleaf and I figured we could just update this one. I don't use either service, so if any capabilities have changed since you wrote the answer, feel free to update it. Cheers!
– Paul Gessler
Apr 19 '15 at 19:31
@alphadelta you're welcome, my edit was prompted by a (now deleted) answer for Overleaf and I figured we could just update this one. I don't use either service, so if any capabilities have changed since you wrote the answer, feel free to update it. Cheers!
– Paul Gessler
Apr 19 '15 at 19:31
2
2
And updated to reflect my revised opinion after using ShareLaTeX for a while.
– 0az
Apr 20 '15 at 22:16
And updated to reflect my revised opinion after using ShareLaTeX for a while.
– 0az
Apr 20 '15 at 22:16
It seems Overleaf now has only 100MB free (I still prefer it though).
– Mark
Jun 18 '15 at 21:22
It seems Overleaf now has only 100MB free (I still prefer it though).
– Mark
Jun 18 '15 at 21:22
ShareLaTeX misses git support: github.com/sharelatex/sharelatex/issues/10
– koppor
Sep 10 '15 at 10:21
ShareLaTeX misses git support: github.com/sharelatex/sharelatex/issues/10
– koppor
Sep 10 '15 at 10:21
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
27
down vote
I've also tried both. WriteLaTeX (now Overleaf) is a bit prettier, but in the end I prefer ShareLaTeX for these reasons:
- It compiles faster
- Autocomplete is more robust: it works with package and custom commands
- It doesn't spawn multiple browser windows/tabs like Overleaf
- Ctrl-C and Ctrl-V work in vim mode, this doesn't work in Overleaf
- It's really easy to access the compiled pdf, it is just https://www.sharelatex.com/project/[project_id]/output/output.pdf
- You can zoom into the preview, and click url{} links the preview. You can't in Overleaf, this is a showstopper for Overleaf for me.
The only things I miss from Overleaf are autocompile and better editor/preview position sync.
add a comment |
up vote
27
down vote
I've also tried both. WriteLaTeX (now Overleaf) is a bit prettier, but in the end I prefer ShareLaTeX for these reasons:
- It compiles faster
- Autocomplete is more robust: it works with package and custom commands
- It doesn't spawn multiple browser windows/tabs like Overleaf
- Ctrl-C and Ctrl-V work in vim mode, this doesn't work in Overleaf
- It's really easy to access the compiled pdf, it is just https://www.sharelatex.com/project/[project_id]/output/output.pdf
- You can zoom into the preview, and click url{} links the preview. You can't in Overleaf, this is a showstopper for Overleaf for me.
The only things I miss from Overleaf are autocompile and better editor/preview position sync.
add a comment |
up vote
27
down vote
up vote
27
down vote
I've also tried both. WriteLaTeX (now Overleaf) is a bit prettier, but in the end I prefer ShareLaTeX for these reasons:
- It compiles faster
- Autocomplete is more robust: it works with package and custom commands
- It doesn't spawn multiple browser windows/tabs like Overleaf
- Ctrl-C and Ctrl-V work in vim mode, this doesn't work in Overleaf
- It's really easy to access the compiled pdf, it is just https://www.sharelatex.com/project/[project_id]/output/output.pdf
- You can zoom into the preview, and click url{} links the preview. You can't in Overleaf, this is a showstopper for Overleaf for me.
The only things I miss from Overleaf are autocompile and better editor/preview position sync.
I've also tried both. WriteLaTeX (now Overleaf) is a bit prettier, but in the end I prefer ShareLaTeX for these reasons:
- It compiles faster
- Autocomplete is more robust: it works with package and custom commands
- It doesn't spawn multiple browser windows/tabs like Overleaf
- Ctrl-C and Ctrl-V work in vim mode, this doesn't work in Overleaf
- It's really easy to access the compiled pdf, it is just https://www.sharelatex.com/project/[project_id]/output/output.pdf
- You can zoom into the preview, and click url{} links the preview. You can't in Overleaf, this is a showstopper for Overleaf for me.
The only things I miss from Overleaf are autocompile and better editor/preview position sync.
edited Jan 15 '16 at 18:54
answered Jun 30 '15 at 15:49
kgeter
37133
37133
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
An interesting property of Overleaf not mentioned here yet, is the fact that the free version supports Git. It is possible to clone your project to your computer, work on it offline, commit your changes, pull new changes, etc.
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
An interesting property of Overleaf not mentioned here yet, is the fact that the free version supports Git. It is possible to clone your project to your computer, work on it offline, commit your changes, pull new changes, etc.
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
up vote
15
down vote
An interesting property of Overleaf not mentioned here yet, is the fact that the free version supports Git. It is possible to clone your project to your computer, work on it offline, commit your changes, pull new changes, etc.
An interesting property of Overleaf not mentioned here yet, is the fact that the free version supports Git. It is possible to clone your project to your computer, work on it offline, commit your changes, pull new changes, etc.
edited Aug 24 '16 at 12:29
Stefan Pinnow
19.2k83174
19.2k83174
answered Aug 24 '16 at 11:52
Christof Vermeersch
25923
25923
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
One of the main differences I saw is in the use of BibTeX: Overleaf gives you popup access to a search windows when typing citep{}
, making easy to find the key you want to use, while ShareLaTeX does nothing.
edit: ShareLaTeX has just added this feature too, see: https://www.sharelatex.com/blog/2016/02/09/word-count.html
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
One of the main differences I saw is in the use of BibTeX: Overleaf gives you popup access to a search windows when typing citep{}
, making easy to find the key you want to use, while ShareLaTeX does nothing.
edit: ShareLaTeX has just added this feature too, see: https://www.sharelatex.com/blog/2016/02/09/word-count.html
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
up vote
9
down vote
One of the main differences I saw is in the use of BibTeX: Overleaf gives you popup access to a search windows when typing citep{}
, making easy to find the key you want to use, while ShareLaTeX does nothing.
edit: ShareLaTeX has just added this feature too, see: https://www.sharelatex.com/blog/2016/02/09/word-count.html
One of the main differences I saw is in the use of BibTeX: Overleaf gives you popup access to a search windows when typing citep{}
, making easy to find the key you want to use, while ShareLaTeX does nothing.
edit: ShareLaTeX has just added this feature too, see: https://www.sharelatex.com/blog/2016/02/09/word-count.html
edited Feb 10 '16 at 13:30
PsyNeuroSci
1053
1053
answered Jan 21 '16 at 14:06
StarObs
9111
9111
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
I totally love the RTF (Rich Text)mood of Overleaf. I don't like the online stuff; but, I am sold because of it. Writing with the neat window is much attractive than swimming inside a Latex code. The code blurs, obstructs the content in the usual Latex editor---The RTF mood removed the obstruction without minimizing the power of the latex: LYX does simplify the editing under the price of losing full control.
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
I totally love the RTF (Rich Text)mood of Overleaf. I don't like the online stuff; but, I am sold because of it. Writing with the neat window is much attractive than swimming inside a Latex code. The code blurs, obstructs the content in the usual Latex editor---The RTF mood removed the obstruction without minimizing the power of the latex: LYX does simplify the editing under the price of losing full control.
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
up vote
9
down vote
I totally love the RTF (Rich Text)mood of Overleaf. I don't like the online stuff; but, I am sold because of it. Writing with the neat window is much attractive than swimming inside a Latex code. The code blurs, obstructs the content in the usual Latex editor---The RTF mood removed the obstruction without minimizing the power of the latex: LYX does simplify the editing under the price of losing full control.
I totally love the RTF (Rich Text)mood of Overleaf. I don't like the online stuff; but, I am sold because of it. Writing with the neat window is much attractive than swimming inside a Latex code. The code blurs, obstructs the content in the usual Latex editor---The RTF mood removed the obstruction without minimizing the power of the latex: LYX does simplify the editing under the price of losing full control.
edited Dec 13 '16 at 3:47
answered Dec 13 '16 at 3:39
Dellu
482513
482513
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
I have tried only Overleaf. Brief word about my profile: I am a scientist (astrophysicist), use three different computers, and mostly mac user but do heavy computing with linux.
Whenever I have an internet connection, I use overleaf instead of a local editor and here is why:
- automatic updating and preview of final document in the right side of the screen
- support for git versioning: you can easily add files locally and push to the cloud using git (you can keep a github repo if you want and sync with overleaf)
- awesome syntax highlighting for latex (the best I’ve seen)
- no hassle about installing common latex packages
- lots and lots of templates for all kinds of documents and scientific journals
- can save tagged versions of the document (similar to LibreOffice versions)
- and of course: support for collaborative editing (a la google docs)
It has some other features which I do not really care about, but might be useful for some users:
- support for rich text format if you are not a fan of latex syntax
- works in your smartphone (tested on iOS)
I tested Overleaf on Safari and Chrome; Macbook and Chromebook. Works like a charm.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
I have tried only Overleaf. Brief word about my profile: I am a scientist (astrophysicist), use three different computers, and mostly mac user but do heavy computing with linux.
Whenever I have an internet connection, I use overleaf instead of a local editor and here is why:
- automatic updating and preview of final document in the right side of the screen
- support for git versioning: you can easily add files locally and push to the cloud using git (you can keep a github repo if you want and sync with overleaf)
- awesome syntax highlighting for latex (the best I’ve seen)
- no hassle about installing common latex packages
- lots and lots of templates for all kinds of documents and scientific journals
- can save tagged versions of the document (similar to LibreOffice versions)
- and of course: support for collaborative editing (a la google docs)
It has some other features which I do not really care about, but might be useful for some users:
- support for rich text format if you are not a fan of latex syntax
- works in your smartphone (tested on iOS)
I tested Overleaf on Safari and Chrome; Macbook and Chromebook. Works like a charm.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
I have tried only Overleaf. Brief word about my profile: I am a scientist (astrophysicist), use three different computers, and mostly mac user but do heavy computing with linux.
Whenever I have an internet connection, I use overleaf instead of a local editor and here is why:
- automatic updating and preview of final document in the right side of the screen
- support for git versioning: you can easily add files locally and push to the cloud using git (you can keep a github repo if you want and sync with overleaf)
- awesome syntax highlighting for latex (the best I’ve seen)
- no hassle about installing common latex packages
- lots and lots of templates for all kinds of documents and scientific journals
- can save tagged versions of the document (similar to LibreOffice versions)
- and of course: support for collaborative editing (a la google docs)
It has some other features which I do not really care about, but might be useful for some users:
- support for rich text format if you are not a fan of latex syntax
- works in your smartphone (tested on iOS)
I tested Overleaf on Safari and Chrome; Macbook and Chromebook. Works like a charm.
I have tried only Overleaf. Brief word about my profile: I am a scientist (astrophysicist), use three different computers, and mostly mac user but do heavy computing with linux.
Whenever I have an internet connection, I use overleaf instead of a local editor and here is why:
- automatic updating and preview of final document in the right side of the screen
- support for git versioning: you can easily add files locally and push to the cloud using git (you can keep a github repo if you want and sync with overleaf)
- awesome syntax highlighting for latex (the best I’ve seen)
- no hassle about installing common latex packages
- lots and lots of templates for all kinds of documents and scientific journals
- can save tagged versions of the document (similar to LibreOffice versions)
- and of course: support for collaborative editing (a la google docs)
It has some other features which I do not really care about, but might be useful for some users:
- support for rich text format if you are not a fan of latex syntax
- works in your smartphone (tested on iOS)
I tested Overleaf on Safari and Chrome; Macbook and Chromebook. Works like a charm.
answered Jun 27 '16 at 14:41
Rodrigo
8913
8913
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
One thing I like about overleaf, is that it lets you download your bibliography directly from Zotero (so you can just click refresh, rather than export a bib file from your computer then upload it).
Major drawback: they import your ENTIRE zotero library. Mine has grown to be quite large (overleaf's bib file is 1.5M) - not a show stopper but unnecessary bloat for the project and it took a while to download and it doesn't update as I add things to zotero.
– drevicko
Aug 23 '17 at 10:19
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
One thing I like about overleaf, is that it lets you download your bibliography directly from Zotero (so you can just click refresh, rather than export a bib file from your computer then upload it).
Major drawback: they import your ENTIRE zotero library. Mine has grown to be quite large (overleaf's bib file is 1.5M) - not a show stopper but unnecessary bloat for the project and it took a while to download and it doesn't update as I add things to zotero.
– drevicko
Aug 23 '17 at 10:19
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
One thing I like about overleaf, is that it lets you download your bibliography directly from Zotero (so you can just click refresh, rather than export a bib file from your computer then upload it).
One thing I like about overleaf, is that it lets you download your bibliography directly from Zotero (so you can just click refresh, rather than export a bib file from your computer then upload it).
answered Nov 30 '16 at 11:07
Eric Ireland
484
484
Major drawback: they import your ENTIRE zotero library. Mine has grown to be quite large (overleaf's bib file is 1.5M) - not a show stopper but unnecessary bloat for the project and it took a while to download and it doesn't update as I add things to zotero.
– drevicko
Aug 23 '17 at 10:19
add a comment |
Major drawback: they import your ENTIRE zotero library. Mine has grown to be quite large (overleaf's bib file is 1.5M) - not a show stopper but unnecessary bloat for the project and it took a while to download and it doesn't update as I add things to zotero.
– drevicko
Aug 23 '17 at 10:19
Major drawback: they import your ENTIRE zotero library. Mine has grown to be quite large (overleaf's bib file is 1.5M) - not a show stopper but unnecessary bloat for the project and it took a while to download and it doesn't update as I add things to zotero.
– drevicko
Aug 23 '17 at 10:19
Major drawback: they import your ENTIRE zotero library. Mine has grown to be quite large (overleaf's bib file is 1.5M) - not a show stopper but unnecessary bloat for the project and it took a while to download and it doesn't update as I add things to zotero.
– drevicko
Aug 23 '17 at 10:19
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
I preferred ShareLaTeX because the documents are private.
In free Overleaf, whoever has the document url can edit.
5
Welcome to the site! Note that you can get Read only-links for Overleaf projects.
– Torbjørn T.
Nov 15 '16 at 15:52
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
I preferred ShareLaTeX because the documents are private.
In free Overleaf, whoever has the document url can edit.
5
Welcome to the site! Note that you can get Read only-links for Overleaf projects.
– Torbjørn T.
Nov 15 '16 at 15:52
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
I preferred ShareLaTeX because the documents are private.
In free Overleaf, whoever has the document url can edit.
I preferred ShareLaTeX because the documents are private.
In free Overleaf, whoever has the document url can edit.
answered Nov 15 '16 at 15:41
Giulio
311
311
5
Welcome to the site! Note that you can get Read only-links for Overleaf projects.
– Torbjørn T.
Nov 15 '16 at 15:52
add a comment |
5
Welcome to the site! Note that you can get Read only-links for Overleaf projects.
– Torbjørn T.
Nov 15 '16 at 15:52
5
5
Welcome to the site! Note that you can get Read only-links for Overleaf projects.
– Torbjørn T.
Nov 15 '16 at 15:52
Welcome to the site! Note that you can get Read only-links for Overleaf projects.
– Torbjørn T.
Nov 15 '16 at 15:52
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Just a quick note that ShareLaTeX and Overleaf have now merged into the new Overleaf v2 platform on 4th September 2018. All previous features from ShareLaTeX and Overleaf are/will be retained (or re-implemented) in v2, including most mentioned on this page.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Just a quick note that ShareLaTeX and Overleaf have now merged into the new Overleaf v2 platform on 4th September 2018. All previous features from ShareLaTeX and Overleaf are/will be retained (or re-implemented) in v2, including most mentioned on this page.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Just a quick note that ShareLaTeX and Overleaf have now merged into the new Overleaf v2 platform on 4th September 2018. All previous features from ShareLaTeX and Overleaf are/will be retained (or re-implemented) in v2, including most mentioned on this page.
Just a quick note that ShareLaTeX and Overleaf have now merged into the new Overleaf v2 platform on 4th September 2018. All previous features from ShareLaTeX and Overleaf are/will be retained (or re-implemented) in v2, including most mentioned on this page.
answered 23 mins ago
LianTze Lim
7,44322663
7,44322663
add a comment |
add a comment |
protected by Joseph Wright♦ Apr 5 '17 at 18:02
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
6
@Jubobs if a complete free no-registration service exists, it would be nice for people doing a LaTeX course as it avoids having to explain to students how to install a distribution on their own, if any, computers, for homework, alongside work at school.
– jfbu
May 19 '14 at 12:42
5
I may lose some reputation here by saying this, but... WriteLatex has a pseudo-WYSIGYG option which can help some new/eventual LaTeX users...
– Andrestand
Jun 25 '14 at 7:15
6
This poster may be a useful overview: academia.edu/3471054/…
– crsh
Jul 30 '14 at 15:45
4
One interesting vantage point of ShareLaTeX over WriteLaTeX is that the former is free and open source software and can be customized and deployed locally if the users wishes so.
– Giovanni Mascellani
Dec 16 '14 at 15:45
5
sharelatex and overleaf just merged overleaf.com/blog/…
– KlingonJoe
Jul 20 '17 at 23:57