change footnotes to endnotes, but allow some old footnotes
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
My question is similar to How can I get two sequences of "footnotes" in one LaTeX document, one as footnotes, the other as endnotes? and also to Is there a way to move all footnotes to the end of the document?
I have a book project that uses footnote{}
for all notes, but it is proposed to change all such notes that are just references or scholarly notes to endnotes, while also leaving notes that amplify the discussion as footnotes. I estimate that ~ 90% of notes will become endnotes.
change in the text those that should remain footnotes to use a new command
FN{}
redefine
footnote{}
topagenote{}
using thepagenote
package (this seems more capable thanendnotes
).
But I'm not sure how to accomplish this. What I'm thinking is to use the following:
usepackage{pagenote}
makepagenote
renewcommand*{notedivision}{chapter*{notesname}}
letoldfootnotefootnote
letfootnotepagenote
newcommand{FN}[1]{oldfootnote{#1}}
Will this work? That is,
can one actually have footnotes and endnotes in the same document?
will my method of defining
FN{}
in terms of a savedoldfootnote
work?
Edit:
What I proposed above does work, at least partially. That is, notes coded as FN{}
do appear as footnotes in the text, while all others, coded as footnote{}
are translated to endnotes, and appear in a final Notes chapter*{Notes}
.
However, they are all shown in the text with sequential superscript numbers.
If I am to make this work, I need to distinguish the footnotes from the endnotes in the text, say, by using superscript letters for the footnote symbols. I tried reordering the commands and re-defining the footnote symbol as follows, but this doesn't make the FN{}
s appear as superscript letters.
usepackage{pagenote}
letoldfootnotefootnote
newcommand{FN}[1]{oldfootnote{#1}}
makeatletter
let@fnsymbol@alph
makeatother
makepagenote
letfootnotepagenote
renewcommand*{notedivision}{chapter*{notesname}}
footnotes endnotes
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 16 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
My question is similar to How can I get two sequences of "footnotes" in one LaTeX document, one as footnotes, the other as endnotes? and also to Is there a way to move all footnotes to the end of the document?
I have a book project that uses footnote{}
for all notes, but it is proposed to change all such notes that are just references or scholarly notes to endnotes, while also leaving notes that amplify the discussion as footnotes. I estimate that ~ 90% of notes will become endnotes.
change in the text those that should remain footnotes to use a new command
FN{}
redefine
footnote{}
topagenote{}
using thepagenote
package (this seems more capable thanendnotes
).
But I'm not sure how to accomplish this. What I'm thinking is to use the following:
usepackage{pagenote}
makepagenote
renewcommand*{notedivision}{chapter*{notesname}}
letoldfootnotefootnote
letfootnotepagenote
newcommand{FN}[1]{oldfootnote{#1}}
Will this work? That is,
can one actually have footnotes and endnotes in the same document?
will my method of defining
FN{}
in terms of a savedoldfootnote
work?
Edit:
What I proposed above does work, at least partially. That is, notes coded as FN{}
do appear as footnotes in the text, while all others, coded as footnote{}
are translated to endnotes, and appear in a final Notes chapter*{Notes}
.
However, they are all shown in the text with sequential superscript numbers.
If I am to make this work, I need to distinguish the footnotes from the endnotes in the text, say, by using superscript letters for the footnote symbols. I tried reordering the commands and re-defining the footnote symbol as follows, but this doesn't make the FN{}
s appear as superscript letters.
usepackage{pagenote}
letoldfootnotefootnote
newcommand{FN}[1]{oldfootnote{#1}}
makeatletter
let@fnsymbol@alph
makeatother
makepagenote
letfootnotepagenote
renewcommand*{notedivision}{chapter*{notesname}}
footnotes endnotes
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 16 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
2
I'd find/replace the existing footnote commands (easy in any respectable editor) rather than unnecessarily redefining the command
– Chris H
Nov 3 '17 at 19:19
i've seenenotez
used in a book that had both (a lot of) endnotes and (just a few) footnotes. (unfortunately, i haven't got time right now to dig up the archive.)
– barbara beeton
Nov 3 '17 at 19:20
@ChrisH There would be far too many footnotes to change to endnotes. My idea, if it can be made to work, requires changing only a small number toFN{}
– user101089
Nov 3 '17 at 19:23
If you've ever used a decent editor with a replace all (across multiple files if necessary) you could do it in less time than it took to type the question.
– Chris H
Nov 3 '17 at 20:06
You've missed the point, which I tried to clarify in an edit. Changing all manually, or even with a tool likeperl
is a one-way operation. No way to revert. Redefining the command leaves only the real footnotes to deal with.
– user101089
Nov 3 '17 at 21:38
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
My question is similar to How can I get two sequences of "footnotes" in one LaTeX document, one as footnotes, the other as endnotes? and also to Is there a way to move all footnotes to the end of the document?
I have a book project that uses footnote{}
for all notes, but it is proposed to change all such notes that are just references or scholarly notes to endnotes, while also leaving notes that amplify the discussion as footnotes. I estimate that ~ 90% of notes will become endnotes.
change in the text those that should remain footnotes to use a new command
FN{}
redefine
footnote{}
topagenote{}
using thepagenote
package (this seems more capable thanendnotes
).
But I'm not sure how to accomplish this. What I'm thinking is to use the following:
usepackage{pagenote}
makepagenote
renewcommand*{notedivision}{chapter*{notesname}}
letoldfootnotefootnote
letfootnotepagenote
newcommand{FN}[1]{oldfootnote{#1}}
Will this work? That is,
can one actually have footnotes and endnotes in the same document?
will my method of defining
FN{}
in terms of a savedoldfootnote
work?
Edit:
What I proposed above does work, at least partially. That is, notes coded as FN{}
do appear as footnotes in the text, while all others, coded as footnote{}
are translated to endnotes, and appear in a final Notes chapter*{Notes}
.
However, they are all shown in the text with sequential superscript numbers.
If I am to make this work, I need to distinguish the footnotes from the endnotes in the text, say, by using superscript letters for the footnote symbols. I tried reordering the commands and re-defining the footnote symbol as follows, but this doesn't make the FN{}
s appear as superscript letters.
usepackage{pagenote}
letoldfootnotefootnote
newcommand{FN}[1]{oldfootnote{#1}}
makeatletter
let@fnsymbol@alph
makeatother
makepagenote
letfootnotepagenote
renewcommand*{notedivision}{chapter*{notesname}}
footnotes endnotes
My question is similar to How can I get two sequences of "footnotes" in one LaTeX document, one as footnotes, the other as endnotes? and also to Is there a way to move all footnotes to the end of the document?
I have a book project that uses footnote{}
for all notes, but it is proposed to change all such notes that are just references or scholarly notes to endnotes, while also leaving notes that amplify the discussion as footnotes. I estimate that ~ 90% of notes will become endnotes.
change in the text those that should remain footnotes to use a new command
FN{}
redefine
footnote{}
topagenote{}
using thepagenote
package (this seems more capable thanendnotes
).
But I'm not sure how to accomplish this. What I'm thinking is to use the following:
usepackage{pagenote}
makepagenote
renewcommand*{notedivision}{chapter*{notesname}}
letoldfootnotefootnote
letfootnotepagenote
newcommand{FN}[1]{oldfootnote{#1}}
Will this work? That is,
can one actually have footnotes and endnotes in the same document?
will my method of defining
FN{}
in terms of a savedoldfootnote
work?
Edit:
What I proposed above does work, at least partially. That is, notes coded as FN{}
do appear as footnotes in the text, while all others, coded as footnote{}
are translated to endnotes, and appear in a final Notes chapter*{Notes}
.
However, they are all shown in the text with sequential superscript numbers.
If I am to make this work, I need to distinguish the footnotes from the endnotes in the text, say, by using superscript letters for the footnote symbols. I tried reordering the commands and re-defining the footnote symbol as follows, but this doesn't make the FN{}
s appear as superscript letters.
usepackage{pagenote}
letoldfootnotefootnote
newcommand{FN}[1]{oldfootnote{#1}}
makeatletter
let@fnsymbol@alph
makeatother
makepagenote
letfootnotepagenote
renewcommand*{notedivision}{chapter*{notesname}}
footnotes endnotes
footnotes endnotes
edited Nov 7 '17 at 15:41
asked Nov 3 '17 at 18:42
user101089
535311
535311
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 16 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 16 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
2
I'd find/replace the existing footnote commands (easy in any respectable editor) rather than unnecessarily redefining the command
– Chris H
Nov 3 '17 at 19:19
i've seenenotez
used in a book that had both (a lot of) endnotes and (just a few) footnotes. (unfortunately, i haven't got time right now to dig up the archive.)
– barbara beeton
Nov 3 '17 at 19:20
@ChrisH There would be far too many footnotes to change to endnotes. My idea, if it can be made to work, requires changing only a small number toFN{}
– user101089
Nov 3 '17 at 19:23
If you've ever used a decent editor with a replace all (across multiple files if necessary) you could do it in less time than it took to type the question.
– Chris H
Nov 3 '17 at 20:06
You've missed the point, which I tried to clarify in an edit. Changing all manually, or even with a tool likeperl
is a one-way operation. No way to revert. Redefining the command leaves only the real footnotes to deal with.
– user101089
Nov 3 '17 at 21:38
|
show 2 more comments
2
I'd find/replace the existing footnote commands (easy in any respectable editor) rather than unnecessarily redefining the command
– Chris H
Nov 3 '17 at 19:19
i've seenenotez
used in a book that had both (a lot of) endnotes and (just a few) footnotes. (unfortunately, i haven't got time right now to dig up the archive.)
– barbara beeton
Nov 3 '17 at 19:20
@ChrisH There would be far too many footnotes to change to endnotes. My idea, if it can be made to work, requires changing only a small number toFN{}
– user101089
Nov 3 '17 at 19:23
If you've ever used a decent editor with a replace all (across multiple files if necessary) you could do it in less time than it took to type the question.
– Chris H
Nov 3 '17 at 20:06
You've missed the point, which I tried to clarify in an edit. Changing all manually, or even with a tool likeperl
is a one-way operation. No way to revert. Redefining the command leaves only the real footnotes to deal with.
– user101089
Nov 3 '17 at 21:38
2
2
I'd find/replace the existing footnote commands (easy in any respectable editor) rather than unnecessarily redefining the command
– Chris H
Nov 3 '17 at 19:19
I'd find/replace the existing footnote commands (easy in any respectable editor) rather than unnecessarily redefining the command
– Chris H
Nov 3 '17 at 19:19
i've seen
enotez
used in a book that had both (a lot of) endnotes and (just a few) footnotes. (unfortunately, i haven't got time right now to dig up the archive.)– barbara beeton
Nov 3 '17 at 19:20
i've seen
enotez
used in a book that had both (a lot of) endnotes and (just a few) footnotes. (unfortunately, i haven't got time right now to dig up the archive.)– barbara beeton
Nov 3 '17 at 19:20
@ChrisH There would be far too many footnotes to change to endnotes. My idea, if it can be made to work, requires changing only a small number to
FN{}
– user101089
Nov 3 '17 at 19:23
@ChrisH There would be far too many footnotes to change to endnotes. My idea, if it can be made to work, requires changing only a small number to
FN{}
– user101089
Nov 3 '17 at 19:23
If you've ever used a decent editor with a replace all (across multiple files if necessary) you could do it in less time than it took to type the question.
– Chris H
Nov 3 '17 at 20:06
If you've ever used a decent editor with a replace all (across multiple files if necessary) you could do it in less time than it took to type the question.
– Chris H
Nov 3 '17 at 20:06
You've missed the point, which I tried to clarify in an edit. Changing all manually, or even with a tool like
perl
is a one-way operation. No way to revert. Redefining the command leaves only the real footnotes to deal with.– user101089
Nov 3 '17 at 21:38
You've missed the point, which I tried to clarify in an edit. Changing all manually, or even with a tool like
perl
is a one-way operation. No way to revert. Redefining the command leaves only the real footnotes to deal with.– user101089
Nov 3 '17 at 21:38
|
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
For the context explained above, the following solution works, and more importantly, can be easily reverted to the standard behavior of footnote
, while maintaining the distinction visually in the text.
That is, all footnote{}
s in the text are changed to numbered endnotes that appear in a final chapter*{Notes}
and have numeric superscripts. All FN{}
s appear as footnotes in the text and have alphabetic superscripts. Assume that the following commands are contained in a file inputs/endnotes.tex
and included in the main file via input{inputs/endnotes}
.
usepackage{pagenote}
letoldfootnotefootnote
newcommand{FN}[1]{oldfootnote{#1}}
renewcommand{thefootnote}{alph{footnote}}
makepagenote
letfootnotepagenote
renewcommand*{notedivision}{chapter*{notesname}}
For this to work, the original footnote
definition has to be captured first and assigned to FN
, and the footnote symbol changed, before changing to pagenote
.
This, of course, requires that the Notes be printed. Here, it is printed just after the Bibliography, using
bibliography{timeref,graphics}
% Endnotes
chapter*{Notes}
printnotes
...
To revert to the usual, inline printing of footnotes, but still distinguish those from endnotes, use the following, which prints the true footnotes in blue, and just comments out the inclusion of the file that changes the definition of footnote
to endnote
.
newcommand{FN}[1]{{footnote{color{blue}#1}}}
%input{inputs/endnotes}
and also comment out the lines to print the endnotes
% Endnotes
%chapter*{Notes}
%printnotes
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
For the context explained above, the following solution works, and more importantly, can be easily reverted to the standard behavior of footnote
, while maintaining the distinction visually in the text.
That is, all footnote{}
s in the text are changed to numbered endnotes that appear in a final chapter*{Notes}
and have numeric superscripts. All FN{}
s appear as footnotes in the text and have alphabetic superscripts. Assume that the following commands are contained in a file inputs/endnotes.tex
and included in the main file via input{inputs/endnotes}
.
usepackage{pagenote}
letoldfootnotefootnote
newcommand{FN}[1]{oldfootnote{#1}}
renewcommand{thefootnote}{alph{footnote}}
makepagenote
letfootnotepagenote
renewcommand*{notedivision}{chapter*{notesname}}
For this to work, the original footnote
definition has to be captured first and assigned to FN
, and the footnote symbol changed, before changing to pagenote
.
This, of course, requires that the Notes be printed. Here, it is printed just after the Bibliography, using
bibliography{timeref,graphics}
% Endnotes
chapter*{Notes}
printnotes
...
To revert to the usual, inline printing of footnotes, but still distinguish those from endnotes, use the following, which prints the true footnotes in blue, and just comments out the inclusion of the file that changes the definition of footnote
to endnote
.
newcommand{FN}[1]{{footnote{color{blue}#1}}}
%input{inputs/endnotes}
and also comment out the lines to print the endnotes
% Endnotes
%chapter*{Notes}
%printnotes
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
For the context explained above, the following solution works, and more importantly, can be easily reverted to the standard behavior of footnote
, while maintaining the distinction visually in the text.
That is, all footnote{}
s in the text are changed to numbered endnotes that appear in a final chapter*{Notes}
and have numeric superscripts. All FN{}
s appear as footnotes in the text and have alphabetic superscripts. Assume that the following commands are contained in a file inputs/endnotes.tex
and included in the main file via input{inputs/endnotes}
.
usepackage{pagenote}
letoldfootnotefootnote
newcommand{FN}[1]{oldfootnote{#1}}
renewcommand{thefootnote}{alph{footnote}}
makepagenote
letfootnotepagenote
renewcommand*{notedivision}{chapter*{notesname}}
For this to work, the original footnote
definition has to be captured first and assigned to FN
, and the footnote symbol changed, before changing to pagenote
.
This, of course, requires that the Notes be printed. Here, it is printed just after the Bibliography, using
bibliography{timeref,graphics}
% Endnotes
chapter*{Notes}
printnotes
...
To revert to the usual, inline printing of footnotes, but still distinguish those from endnotes, use the following, which prints the true footnotes in blue, and just comments out the inclusion of the file that changes the definition of footnote
to endnote
.
newcommand{FN}[1]{{footnote{color{blue}#1}}}
%input{inputs/endnotes}
and also comment out the lines to print the endnotes
% Endnotes
%chapter*{Notes}
%printnotes
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
For the context explained above, the following solution works, and more importantly, can be easily reverted to the standard behavior of footnote
, while maintaining the distinction visually in the text.
That is, all footnote{}
s in the text are changed to numbered endnotes that appear in a final chapter*{Notes}
and have numeric superscripts. All FN{}
s appear as footnotes in the text and have alphabetic superscripts. Assume that the following commands are contained in a file inputs/endnotes.tex
and included in the main file via input{inputs/endnotes}
.
usepackage{pagenote}
letoldfootnotefootnote
newcommand{FN}[1]{oldfootnote{#1}}
renewcommand{thefootnote}{alph{footnote}}
makepagenote
letfootnotepagenote
renewcommand*{notedivision}{chapter*{notesname}}
For this to work, the original footnote
definition has to be captured first and assigned to FN
, and the footnote symbol changed, before changing to pagenote
.
This, of course, requires that the Notes be printed. Here, it is printed just after the Bibliography, using
bibliography{timeref,graphics}
% Endnotes
chapter*{Notes}
printnotes
...
To revert to the usual, inline printing of footnotes, but still distinguish those from endnotes, use the following, which prints the true footnotes in blue, and just comments out the inclusion of the file that changes the definition of footnote
to endnote
.
newcommand{FN}[1]{{footnote{color{blue}#1}}}
%input{inputs/endnotes}
and also comment out the lines to print the endnotes
% Endnotes
%chapter*{Notes}
%printnotes
For the context explained above, the following solution works, and more importantly, can be easily reverted to the standard behavior of footnote
, while maintaining the distinction visually in the text.
That is, all footnote{}
s in the text are changed to numbered endnotes that appear in a final chapter*{Notes}
and have numeric superscripts. All FN{}
s appear as footnotes in the text and have alphabetic superscripts. Assume that the following commands are contained in a file inputs/endnotes.tex
and included in the main file via input{inputs/endnotes}
.
usepackage{pagenote}
letoldfootnotefootnote
newcommand{FN}[1]{oldfootnote{#1}}
renewcommand{thefootnote}{alph{footnote}}
makepagenote
letfootnotepagenote
renewcommand*{notedivision}{chapter*{notesname}}
For this to work, the original footnote
definition has to be captured first and assigned to FN
, and the footnote symbol changed, before changing to pagenote
.
This, of course, requires that the Notes be printed. Here, it is printed just after the Bibliography, using
bibliography{timeref,graphics}
% Endnotes
chapter*{Notes}
printnotes
...
To revert to the usual, inline printing of footnotes, but still distinguish those from endnotes, use the following, which prints the true footnotes in blue, and just comments out the inclusion of the file that changes the definition of footnote
to endnote
.
newcommand{FN}[1]{{footnote{color{blue}#1}}}
%input{inputs/endnotes}
and also comment out the lines to print the endnotes
% Endnotes
%chapter*{Notes}
%printnotes
edited Dec 5 '17 at 16:01
answered Nov 7 '17 at 16:45
user101089
535311
535311
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f399527%2fchange-footnotes-to-endnotes-but-allow-some-old-footnotes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
I'd find/replace the existing footnote commands (easy in any respectable editor) rather than unnecessarily redefining the command
– Chris H
Nov 3 '17 at 19:19
i've seen
enotez
used in a book that had both (a lot of) endnotes and (just a few) footnotes. (unfortunately, i haven't got time right now to dig up the archive.)– barbara beeton
Nov 3 '17 at 19:20
@ChrisH There would be far too many footnotes to change to endnotes. My idea, if it can be made to work, requires changing only a small number to
FN{}
– user101089
Nov 3 '17 at 19:23
If you've ever used a decent editor with a replace all (across multiple files if necessary) you could do it in less time than it took to type the question.
– Chris H
Nov 3 '17 at 20:06
You've missed the point, which I tried to clarify in an edit. Changing all manually, or even with a tool like
perl
is a one-way operation. No way to revert. Redefining the command leaves only the real footnotes to deal with.– user101089
Nov 3 '17 at 21:38