High pressure canisters of air as gun-less projectiles
$begingroup$
Imagine a small metal canister, with a narrow exit on the top. There is a sort of door covering this, with a metal plate that is removed from the side. The pressure inside of the canister acts as a propellant, launching the weapon forward and propelling it through flight.
My question is: would this work? Some reasons I can think of that may cause this to not work:
- Horrible accuracy
- The opening would have to be too small to be plausible
- The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after
- The cost/energy of producing them is ridiculous
Imagine modern or slightly above modern tech, and enemies at distances of +/- 50 meters.
weapons
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Imagine a small metal canister, with a narrow exit on the top. There is a sort of door covering this, with a metal plate that is removed from the side. The pressure inside of the canister acts as a propellant, launching the weapon forward and propelling it through flight.
My question is: would this work? Some reasons I can think of that may cause this to not work:
- Horrible accuracy
- The opening would have to be too small to be plausible
- The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after
- The cost/energy of producing them is ridiculous
Imagine modern or slightly above modern tech, and enemies at distances of +/- 50 meters.
weapons
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
$endgroup$
– Creed Arcon
33 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Imagine a small metal canister, with a narrow exit on the top. There is a sort of door covering this, with a metal plate that is removed from the side. The pressure inside of the canister acts as a propellant, launching the weapon forward and propelling it through flight.
My question is: would this work? Some reasons I can think of that may cause this to not work:
- Horrible accuracy
- The opening would have to be too small to be plausible
- The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after
- The cost/energy of producing them is ridiculous
Imagine modern or slightly above modern tech, and enemies at distances of +/- 50 meters.
weapons
$endgroup$
Imagine a small metal canister, with a narrow exit on the top. There is a sort of door covering this, with a metal plate that is removed from the side. The pressure inside of the canister acts as a propellant, launching the weapon forward and propelling it through flight.
My question is: would this work? Some reasons I can think of that may cause this to not work:
- Horrible accuracy
- The opening would have to be too small to be plausible
- The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after
- The cost/energy of producing them is ridiculous
Imagine modern or slightly above modern tech, and enemies at distances of +/- 50 meters.
weapons
weapons
asked 2 hours ago
Redwolf ProgramsRedwolf Programs
9481722
9481722
$begingroup$
here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
$endgroup$
– Creed Arcon
33 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
$endgroup$
– Creed Arcon
33 mins ago
$begingroup$
here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
$endgroup$
– Creed Arcon
33 mins ago
$begingroup$
here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
$endgroup$
– Creed Arcon
33 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here at Weapons R Us, we strive to offer the latest in amazingly inaccurate & astoundingly cumbersome weapons. In fact, we offer two models of precisely the weapons system you're looking for!
First, our Basic Can & Stick; this is our easy to understand, step by step how-to instructional video, shot on site at our manufacturing plant in Siberia.
Second, our Deluxe Rocket Can; this is Myth Busters trying our our latest product!
And finally, at WRS's Backcountry R & D facility; here we are testing our anti-aircraft launch mechanism.
Basic model takes a bit of coaxing to activate, but is quite effective. Our deluxe model is, generally speaking, an instant success! Contrary to mythconception, this weapon system is relatively easy to mass produce and not terribly expensive. As you can imagine, even the cans are recyclable!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can't stop laughing at the first one...
$endgroup$
– Redwolf Programs
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
$endgroup$
– Cyn
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
$endgroup$
– Justin Thyme the Second
23 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A resounding 'yes' at +/- 50 meters.
The compressed CO2 cylinders used in air guns have enough force to launch the cylinders at least 50 m.
They are used to propel rocket car models, rockets, and such. We had a stray (one that came out of the end of a rocket) ricochet back and forth in a classroom 20 m long. Left dents in several places in the walls. The trick would be to launch them in a tube just slightly larger than the gas cylinder. The firing pin would be exactly that - a pin that punctures a small hole in the nozzle end. We used a hammer and a nail. Put a hardened bullet-type nose on them, and maybe a trailing rigid tail or stability, and you would certainly have a weapon that would hurt.
These CO2 cylinders can be made quite inexpensively, although probably not cost competitive with bullets.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140601%2fhigh-pressure-canisters-of-air-as-gun-less-projectiles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here at Weapons R Us, we strive to offer the latest in amazingly inaccurate & astoundingly cumbersome weapons. In fact, we offer two models of precisely the weapons system you're looking for!
First, our Basic Can & Stick; this is our easy to understand, step by step how-to instructional video, shot on site at our manufacturing plant in Siberia.
Second, our Deluxe Rocket Can; this is Myth Busters trying our our latest product!
And finally, at WRS's Backcountry R & D facility; here we are testing our anti-aircraft launch mechanism.
Basic model takes a bit of coaxing to activate, but is quite effective. Our deluxe model is, generally speaking, an instant success! Contrary to mythconception, this weapon system is relatively easy to mass produce and not terribly expensive. As you can imagine, even the cans are recyclable!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can't stop laughing at the first one...
$endgroup$
– Redwolf Programs
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
$endgroup$
– Cyn
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
$endgroup$
– Justin Thyme the Second
23 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here at Weapons R Us, we strive to offer the latest in amazingly inaccurate & astoundingly cumbersome weapons. In fact, we offer two models of precisely the weapons system you're looking for!
First, our Basic Can & Stick; this is our easy to understand, step by step how-to instructional video, shot on site at our manufacturing plant in Siberia.
Second, our Deluxe Rocket Can; this is Myth Busters trying our our latest product!
And finally, at WRS's Backcountry R & D facility; here we are testing our anti-aircraft launch mechanism.
Basic model takes a bit of coaxing to activate, but is quite effective. Our deluxe model is, generally speaking, an instant success! Contrary to mythconception, this weapon system is relatively easy to mass produce and not terribly expensive. As you can imagine, even the cans are recyclable!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can't stop laughing at the first one...
$endgroup$
– Redwolf Programs
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
$endgroup$
– Cyn
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
$endgroup$
– Justin Thyme the Second
23 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here at Weapons R Us, we strive to offer the latest in amazingly inaccurate & astoundingly cumbersome weapons. In fact, we offer two models of precisely the weapons system you're looking for!
First, our Basic Can & Stick; this is our easy to understand, step by step how-to instructional video, shot on site at our manufacturing plant in Siberia.
Second, our Deluxe Rocket Can; this is Myth Busters trying our our latest product!
And finally, at WRS's Backcountry R & D facility; here we are testing our anti-aircraft launch mechanism.
Basic model takes a bit of coaxing to activate, but is quite effective. Our deluxe model is, generally speaking, an instant success! Contrary to mythconception, this weapon system is relatively easy to mass produce and not terribly expensive. As you can imagine, even the cans are recyclable!
$endgroup$
Here at Weapons R Us, we strive to offer the latest in amazingly inaccurate & astoundingly cumbersome weapons. In fact, we offer two models of precisely the weapons system you're looking for!
First, our Basic Can & Stick; this is our easy to understand, step by step how-to instructional video, shot on site at our manufacturing plant in Siberia.
Second, our Deluxe Rocket Can; this is Myth Busters trying our our latest product!
And finally, at WRS's Backcountry R & D facility; here we are testing our anti-aircraft launch mechanism.
Basic model takes a bit of coaxing to activate, but is quite effective. Our deluxe model is, generally speaking, an instant success! Contrary to mythconception, this weapon system is relatively easy to mass produce and not terribly expensive. As you can imagine, even the cans are recyclable!
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
elemtilaselemtilas
13.9k22861
13.9k22861
$begingroup$
Can't stop laughing at the first one...
$endgroup$
– Redwolf Programs
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
$endgroup$
– Cyn
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
$endgroup$
– Justin Thyme the Second
23 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can't stop laughing at the first one...
$endgroup$
– Redwolf Programs
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
$endgroup$
– Cyn
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
$endgroup$
– Justin Thyme the Second
23 mins ago
$begingroup$
Can't stop laughing at the first one...
$endgroup$
– Redwolf Programs
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Can't stop laughing at the first one...
$endgroup$
– Redwolf Programs
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
$endgroup$
– Cyn
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
$endgroup$
– Cyn
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
$endgroup$
– Justin Thyme the Second
23 mins ago
$begingroup$
Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
$endgroup$
– Justin Thyme the Second
23 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A resounding 'yes' at +/- 50 meters.
The compressed CO2 cylinders used in air guns have enough force to launch the cylinders at least 50 m.
They are used to propel rocket car models, rockets, and such. We had a stray (one that came out of the end of a rocket) ricochet back and forth in a classroom 20 m long. Left dents in several places in the walls. The trick would be to launch them in a tube just slightly larger than the gas cylinder. The firing pin would be exactly that - a pin that punctures a small hole in the nozzle end. We used a hammer and a nail. Put a hardened bullet-type nose on them, and maybe a trailing rigid tail or stability, and you would certainly have a weapon that would hurt.
These CO2 cylinders can be made quite inexpensively, although probably not cost competitive with bullets.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A resounding 'yes' at +/- 50 meters.
The compressed CO2 cylinders used in air guns have enough force to launch the cylinders at least 50 m.
They are used to propel rocket car models, rockets, and such. We had a stray (one that came out of the end of a rocket) ricochet back and forth in a classroom 20 m long. Left dents in several places in the walls. The trick would be to launch them in a tube just slightly larger than the gas cylinder. The firing pin would be exactly that - a pin that punctures a small hole in the nozzle end. We used a hammer and a nail. Put a hardened bullet-type nose on them, and maybe a trailing rigid tail or stability, and you would certainly have a weapon that would hurt.
These CO2 cylinders can be made quite inexpensively, although probably not cost competitive with bullets.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A resounding 'yes' at +/- 50 meters.
The compressed CO2 cylinders used in air guns have enough force to launch the cylinders at least 50 m.
They are used to propel rocket car models, rockets, and such. We had a stray (one that came out of the end of a rocket) ricochet back and forth in a classroom 20 m long. Left dents in several places in the walls. The trick would be to launch them in a tube just slightly larger than the gas cylinder. The firing pin would be exactly that - a pin that punctures a small hole in the nozzle end. We used a hammer and a nail. Put a hardened bullet-type nose on them, and maybe a trailing rigid tail or stability, and you would certainly have a weapon that would hurt.
These CO2 cylinders can be made quite inexpensively, although probably not cost competitive with bullets.
$endgroup$
A resounding 'yes' at +/- 50 meters.
The compressed CO2 cylinders used in air guns have enough force to launch the cylinders at least 50 m.
They are used to propel rocket car models, rockets, and such. We had a stray (one that came out of the end of a rocket) ricochet back and forth in a classroom 20 m long. Left dents in several places in the walls. The trick would be to launch them in a tube just slightly larger than the gas cylinder. The firing pin would be exactly that - a pin that punctures a small hole in the nozzle end. We used a hammer and a nail. Put a hardened bullet-type nose on them, and maybe a trailing rigid tail or stability, and you would certainly have a weapon that would hurt.
These CO2 cylinders can be made quite inexpensively, although probably not cost competitive with bullets.
answered 12 mins ago
Justin Thyme the SecondJustin Thyme the Second
5826
5826
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140601%2fhigh-pressure-canisters-of-air-as-gun-less-projectiles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
$endgroup$
– Creed Arcon
33 mins ago