What is the best-looking way to produce enlarged mathematical symbols in equation mode using lmodern?
I noticed that there is no way to produce a larger version of the summation symbol when writing equations. This
usepackage{lmodern}
begin{equation}
sum
end{equation}
cannot be magnified using any commands. In looking for answers, I read that perhaps this is a bug, and the lmodern font does not contain any large versions of mathematical symbols. I am not sure if that is true. I have attempted to use some packages such as exscale to change this, but I have not been able to produce enlarged symbols, even if I remove lmodern. I do not want to make the entire equation larger -- JUST the summation symbol, for example.
I would like to keep the lmodern font, but simply scale up the symbols. Is there a way to do this that looks natural?
equations symbols lmodern
New contributor
add a comment |
I noticed that there is no way to produce a larger version of the summation symbol when writing equations. This
usepackage{lmodern}
begin{equation}
sum
end{equation}
cannot be magnified using any commands. In looking for answers, I read that perhaps this is a bug, and the lmodern font does not contain any large versions of mathematical symbols. I am not sure if that is true. I have attempted to use some packages such as exscale to change this, but I have not been able to produce enlarged symbols, even if I remove lmodern. I do not want to make the entire equation larger -- JUST the summation symbol, for example.
I would like to keep the lmodern font, but simply scale up the symbols. Is there a way to do this that looks natural?
equations symbols lmodern
New contributor
add a comment |
I noticed that there is no way to produce a larger version of the summation symbol when writing equations. This
usepackage{lmodern}
begin{equation}
sum
end{equation}
cannot be magnified using any commands. In looking for answers, I read that perhaps this is a bug, and the lmodern font does not contain any large versions of mathematical symbols. I am not sure if that is true. I have attempted to use some packages such as exscale to change this, but I have not been able to produce enlarged symbols, even if I remove lmodern. I do not want to make the entire equation larger -- JUST the summation symbol, for example.
I would like to keep the lmodern font, but simply scale up the symbols. Is there a way to do this that looks natural?
equations symbols lmodern
New contributor
I noticed that there is no way to produce a larger version of the summation symbol when writing equations. This
usepackage{lmodern}
begin{equation}
sum
end{equation}
cannot be magnified using any commands. In looking for answers, I read that perhaps this is a bug, and the lmodern font does not contain any large versions of mathematical symbols. I am not sure if that is true. I have attempted to use some packages such as exscale to change this, but I have not been able to produce enlarged symbols, even if I remove lmodern. I do not want to make the entire equation larger -- JUST the summation symbol, for example.
I would like to keep the lmodern font, but simply scale up the symbols. Is there a way to do this that looks natural?
equations symbols lmodern
equations symbols lmodern
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 6 mins ago
MachinusMachinus
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Machinus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474466%2fwhat-is-the-best-looking-way-to-produce-enlarged-mathematical-symbols-in-equatio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Machinus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Machinus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Machinus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Machinus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474466%2fwhat-is-the-best-looking-way-to-produce-enlarged-mathematical-symbols-in-equatio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown