Normal footnote in epigraph command












8














I would like to create a "normal" footnote inside epigraph command.



This command cites the reference in a footnote just below the epigraph and not at the end of the page :



epigraph{text}{sourcefootcite{key}}


For example :



epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootcite{author00:_title}}


creates :
enter image description here
How can I create a normal footnote?



MWE :



begin{filecontents}{bib.bib}
@Book{author00:_title,
author = {Author},
title = {Title},
publisher = {Publisher},
year = 2000}
end{filecontents}

documentclass[12pt,twoside,a4paper]{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[english,french]{babel}
frenchbsetup{StandardLists=true}

usepackage{setspace}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{xspace}
usepackage{epigraph}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{filecontents}

usepackage[autostyle=true]{csquotes}
usepackage[style=authoryear-comp,
hyperref,
backend=biber,
isbn=false,
doi=false,
url=false,
date=year]{biblatex}
AtEveryBibitem{clearlist{language}}
renewcommand*{newunitpunct}{addcommaspace}
bibliography{bib}
usepackage[colorlinks]{hyperref}

begin{document}

epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootcite{author00:_title}}
test
end{document}









share|improve this question
























  • @HarishKumar Sorry I updated my question. footcite calls footnote so it is the same thing. And footnotemark has the same behavior.
    – ppr
    Jan 15 '14 at 13:49


















8














I would like to create a "normal" footnote inside epigraph command.



This command cites the reference in a footnote just below the epigraph and not at the end of the page :



epigraph{text}{sourcefootcite{key}}


For example :



epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootcite{author00:_title}}


creates :
enter image description here
How can I create a normal footnote?



MWE :



begin{filecontents}{bib.bib}
@Book{author00:_title,
author = {Author},
title = {Title},
publisher = {Publisher},
year = 2000}
end{filecontents}

documentclass[12pt,twoside,a4paper]{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[english,french]{babel}
frenchbsetup{StandardLists=true}

usepackage{setspace}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{xspace}
usepackage{epigraph}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{filecontents}

usepackage[autostyle=true]{csquotes}
usepackage[style=authoryear-comp,
hyperref,
backend=biber,
isbn=false,
doi=false,
url=false,
date=year]{biblatex}
AtEveryBibitem{clearlist{language}}
renewcommand*{newunitpunct}{addcommaspace}
bibliography{bib}
usepackage[colorlinks]{hyperref}

begin{document}

epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootcite{author00:_title}}
test
end{document}









share|improve this question
























  • @HarishKumar Sorry I updated my question. footcite calls footnote so it is the same thing. And footnotemark has the same behavior.
    – ppr
    Jan 15 '14 at 13:49
















8












8








8







I would like to create a "normal" footnote inside epigraph command.



This command cites the reference in a footnote just below the epigraph and not at the end of the page :



epigraph{text}{sourcefootcite{key}}


For example :



epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootcite{author00:_title}}


creates :
enter image description here
How can I create a normal footnote?



MWE :



begin{filecontents}{bib.bib}
@Book{author00:_title,
author = {Author},
title = {Title},
publisher = {Publisher},
year = 2000}
end{filecontents}

documentclass[12pt,twoside,a4paper]{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[english,french]{babel}
frenchbsetup{StandardLists=true}

usepackage{setspace}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{xspace}
usepackage{epigraph}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{filecontents}

usepackage[autostyle=true]{csquotes}
usepackage[style=authoryear-comp,
hyperref,
backend=biber,
isbn=false,
doi=false,
url=false,
date=year]{biblatex}
AtEveryBibitem{clearlist{language}}
renewcommand*{newunitpunct}{addcommaspace}
bibliography{bib}
usepackage[colorlinks]{hyperref}

begin{document}

epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootcite{author00:_title}}
test
end{document}









share|improve this question















I would like to create a "normal" footnote inside epigraph command.



This command cites the reference in a footnote just below the epigraph and not at the end of the page :



epigraph{text}{sourcefootcite{key}}


For example :



epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootcite{author00:_title}}


creates :
enter image description here
How can I create a normal footnote?



MWE :



begin{filecontents}{bib.bib}
@Book{author00:_title,
author = {Author},
title = {Title},
publisher = {Publisher},
year = 2000}
end{filecontents}

documentclass[12pt,twoside,a4paper]{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[english,french]{babel}
frenchbsetup{StandardLists=true}

usepackage{setspace}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{xspace}
usepackage{epigraph}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{filecontents}

usepackage[autostyle=true]{csquotes}
usepackage[style=authoryear-comp,
hyperref,
backend=biber,
isbn=false,
doi=false,
url=false,
date=year]{biblatex}
AtEveryBibitem{clearlist{language}}
renewcommand*{newunitpunct}{addcommaspace}
bibliography{bib}
usepackage[colorlinks]{hyperref}

begin{document}

epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootcite{author00:_title}}
test
end{document}






footnotes epigraphs






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 15 '14 at 13:52







user11232

















asked Jan 15 '14 at 13:31









pprppr

5,11132564




5,11132564












  • @HarishKumar Sorry I updated my question. footcite calls footnote so it is the same thing. And footnotemark has the same behavior.
    – ppr
    Jan 15 '14 at 13:49




















  • @HarishKumar Sorry I updated my question. footcite calls footnote so it is the same thing. And footnotemark has the same behavior.
    – ppr
    Jan 15 '14 at 13:49


















@HarishKumar Sorry I updated my question. footcite calls footnote so it is the same thing. And footnotemark has the same behavior.
– ppr
Jan 15 '14 at 13:49






@HarishKumar Sorry I updated my question. footcite calls footnote so it is the same thing. And footnotemark has the same behavior.
– ppr
Jan 15 '14 at 13:49












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8














Just use footcitetext:



epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. 
Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootnotemark}
footcitetext{author00:_title}





share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    @HarishKumar I'm a great expert in biblatex, as you know. ;-) Just did a ack search for footcite and I happened to find near it footcitetext. Et voilà.
    – egreg
    Jan 15 '14 at 14:00








  • 1




    Maybe I am using this approach wrong, but here is what I am getting: 1) Footnote is bold regular size text (not footnotesize); 2) Latex commands (textit) are included literally; 3) Hyphenation does not work. What am I missing?
    – ajeh
    Aug 17 '14 at 22:58










  • @egreg I find the answer brilliant! I just have a problem, when I try to customise the footnote symbol, strange things happens, e.g. if I write footnotemark[dagger], the first symbol ends up being a 4-digit string of numbers starting with $0$, while the footnote symbol is $0$. Is there a way to fix this?
    – Kolmin
    Apr 19 '17 at 14:37






  • 1




    @Kolmin The argument to footnotemark is a number, not a symbol
    – egreg
    Apr 19 '17 at 16:45






  • 1




    @Kolmin I see no other way than defining a new series of footnotes (with bigfoot) and defining new footcite commands for using it.
    – egreg
    Apr 19 '17 at 17:22



















0














I have the same probles as @ajeh describes. Anyone can describe thefootcitetextcommand a little bit more precise or recall on the error?






share|improve this answer





















  • The problem solved itself when I started using footnotetext instead of footcitetext. This might help people who face a similiar problem using the solution of @egreg.
    – mugdi
    6 mins ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154202%2fnormal-footnote-in-epigraph-command%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8














Just use footcitetext:



epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. 
Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootnotemark}
footcitetext{author00:_title}





share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    @HarishKumar I'm a great expert in biblatex, as you know. ;-) Just did a ack search for footcite and I happened to find near it footcitetext. Et voilà.
    – egreg
    Jan 15 '14 at 14:00








  • 1




    Maybe I am using this approach wrong, but here is what I am getting: 1) Footnote is bold regular size text (not footnotesize); 2) Latex commands (textit) are included literally; 3) Hyphenation does not work. What am I missing?
    – ajeh
    Aug 17 '14 at 22:58










  • @egreg I find the answer brilliant! I just have a problem, when I try to customise the footnote symbol, strange things happens, e.g. if I write footnotemark[dagger], the first symbol ends up being a 4-digit string of numbers starting with $0$, while the footnote symbol is $0$. Is there a way to fix this?
    – Kolmin
    Apr 19 '17 at 14:37






  • 1




    @Kolmin The argument to footnotemark is a number, not a symbol
    – egreg
    Apr 19 '17 at 16:45






  • 1




    @Kolmin I see no other way than defining a new series of footnotes (with bigfoot) and defining new footcite commands for using it.
    – egreg
    Apr 19 '17 at 17:22
















8














Just use footcitetext:



epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. 
Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootnotemark}
footcitetext{author00:_title}





share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    @HarishKumar I'm a great expert in biblatex, as you know. ;-) Just did a ack search for footcite and I happened to find near it footcitetext. Et voilà.
    – egreg
    Jan 15 '14 at 14:00








  • 1




    Maybe I am using this approach wrong, but here is what I am getting: 1) Footnote is bold regular size text (not footnotesize); 2) Latex commands (textit) are included literally; 3) Hyphenation does not work. What am I missing?
    – ajeh
    Aug 17 '14 at 22:58










  • @egreg I find the answer brilliant! I just have a problem, when I try to customise the footnote symbol, strange things happens, e.g. if I write footnotemark[dagger], the first symbol ends up being a 4-digit string of numbers starting with $0$, while the footnote symbol is $0$. Is there a way to fix this?
    – Kolmin
    Apr 19 '17 at 14:37






  • 1




    @Kolmin The argument to footnotemark is a number, not a symbol
    – egreg
    Apr 19 '17 at 16:45






  • 1




    @Kolmin I see no other way than defining a new series of footnotes (with bigfoot) and defining new footcite commands for using it.
    – egreg
    Apr 19 '17 at 17:22














8












8








8






Just use footcitetext:



epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. 
Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootnotemark}
footcitetext{author00:_title}





share|improve this answer












Just use footcitetext:



epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. 
Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootnotemark}
footcitetext{author00:_title}






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jan 15 '14 at 13:55









egregegreg

710k8618883172




710k8618883172








  • 2




    @HarishKumar I'm a great expert in biblatex, as you know. ;-) Just did a ack search for footcite and I happened to find near it footcitetext. Et voilà.
    – egreg
    Jan 15 '14 at 14:00








  • 1




    Maybe I am using this approach wrong, but here is what I am getting: 1) Footnote is bold regular size text (not footnotesize); 2) Latex commands (textit) are included literally; 3) Hyphenation does not work. What am I missing?
    – ajeh
    Aug 17 '14 at 22:58










  • @egreg I find the answer brilliant! I just have a problem, when I try to customise the footnote symbol, strange things happens, e.g. if I write footnotemark[dagger], the first symbol ends up being a 4-digit string of numbers starting with $0$, while the footnote symbol is $0$. Is there a way to fix this?
    – Kolmin
    Apr 19 '17 at 14:37






  • 1




    @Kolmin The argument to footnotemark is a number, not a symbol
    – egreg
    Apr 19 '17 at 16:45






  • 1




    @Kolmin I see no other way than defining a new series of footnotes (with bigfoot) and defining new footcite commands for using it.
    – egreg
    Apr 19 '17 at 17:22














  • 2




    @HarishKumar I'm a great expert in biblatex, as you know. ;-) Just did a ack search for footcite and I happened to find near it footcitetext. Et voilà.
    – egreg
    Jan 15 '14 at 14:00








  • 1




    Maybe I am using this approach wrong, but here is what I am getting: 1) Footnote is bold regular size text (not footnotesize); 2) Latex commands (textit) are included literally; 3) Hyphenation does not work. What am I missing?
    – ajeh
    Aug 17 '14 at 22:58










  • @egreg I find the answer brilliant! I just have a problem, when I try to customise the footnote symbol, strange things happens, e.g. if I write footnotemark[dagger], the first symbol ends up being a 4-digit string of numbers starting with $0$, while the footnote symbol is $0$. Is there a way to fix this?
    – Kolmin
    Apr 19 '17 at 14:37






  • 1




    @Kolmin The argument to footnotemark is a number, not a symbol
    – egreg
    Apr 19 '17 at 16:45






  • 1




    @Kolmin I see no other way than defining a new series of footnotes (with bigfoot) and defining new footcite commands for using it.
    – egreg
    Apr 19 '17 at 17:22








2




2




@HarishKumar I'm a great expert in biblatex, as you know. ;-) Just did a ack search for footcite and I happened to find near it footcitetext. Et voilà.
– egreg
Jan 15 '14 at 14:00






@HarishKumar I'm a great expert in biblatex, as you know. ;-) Just did a ack search for footcite and I happened to find near it footcitetext. Et voilà.
– egreg
Jan 15 '14 at 14:00






1




1




Maybe I am using this approach wrong, but here is what I am getting: 1) Footnote is bold regular size text (not footnotesize); 2) Latex commands (textit) are included literally; 3) Hyphenation does not work. What am I missing?
– ajeh
Aug 17 '14 at 22:58




Maybe I am using this approach wrong, but here is what I am getting: 1) Footnote is bold regular size text (not footnotesize); 2) Latex commands (textit) are included literally; 3) Hyphenation does not work. What am I missing?
– ajeh
Aug 17 '14 at 22:58












@egreg I find the answer brilliant! I just have a problem, when I try to customise the footnote symbol, strange things happens, e.g. if I write footnotemark[dagger], the first symbol ends up being a 4-digit string of numbers starting with $0$, while the footnote symbol is $0$. Is there a way to fix this?
– Kolmin
Apr 19 '17 at 14:37




@egreg I find the answer brilliant! I just have a problem, when I try to customise the footnote symbol, strange things happens, e.g. if I write footnotemark[dagger], the first symbol ends up being a 4-digit string of numbers starting with $0$, while the footnote symbol is $0$. Is there a way to fix this?
– Kolmin
Apr 19 '17 at 14:37




1




1




@Kolmin The argument to footnotemark is a number, not a symbol
– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 16:45




@Kolmin The argument to footnotemark is a number, not a symbol
– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 16:45




1




1




@Kolmin I see no other way than defining a new series of footnotes (with bigfoot) and defining new footcite commands for using it.
– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 17:22




@Kolmin I see no other way than defining a new series of footnotes (with bigfoot) and defining new footcite commands for using it.
– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 17:22











0














I have the same probles as @ajeh describes. Anyone can describe thefootcitetextcommand a little bit more precise or recall on the error?






share|improve this answer





















  • The problem solved itself when I started using footnotetext instead of footcitetext. This might help people who face a similiar problem using the solution of @egreg.
    – mugdi
    6 mins ago
















0














I have the same probles as @ajeh describes. Anyone can describe thefootcitetextcommand a little bit more precise or recall on the error?






share|improve this answer





















  • The problem solved itself when I started using footnotetext instead of footcitetext. This might help people who face a similiar problem using the solution of @egreg.
    – mugdi
    6 mins ago














0












0








0






I have the same probles as @ajeh describes. Anyone can describe thefootcitetextcommand a little bit more precise or recall on the error?






share|improve this answer












I have the same probles as @ajeh describes. Anyone can describe thefootcitetextcommand a little bit more precise or recall on the error?







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 13 mins ago









mugdimugdi

112




112












  • The problem solved itself when I started using footnotetext instead of footcitetext. This might help people who face a similiar problem using the solution of @egreg.
    – mugdi
    6 mins ago


















  • The problem solved itself when I started using footnotetext instead of footcitetext. This might help people who face a similiar problem using the solution of @egreg.
    – mugdi
    6 mins ago
















The problem solved itself when I started using footnotetext instead of footcitetext. This might help people who face a similiar problem using the solution of @egreg.
– mugdi
6 mins ago




The problem solved itself when I started using footnotetext instead of footcitetext. This might help people who face a similiar problem using the solution of @egreg.
– mugdi
6 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154202%2fnormal-footnote-in-epigraph-command%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Accessing regular linux commands in Huawei's Dopra Linux

Can't connect RFCOMM socket: Host is down

Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal Exception in Interrupt