No such process (3) when not connected to a network (AF_ROUTE)











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












When I am connected to a network, I can send a struct rt_msghdr* to the kernel and receive a corresponding route. However, when I disconnect from the network and try to send the same route message header, the socket fails at send() with errno = ESRCH (3) No such process.



Generic code: (Testing on MacOS)



int sd = create_socket(AF_ROUTE, IPPROTO_RAW, AF_UNSPEC);

memset(&buffer[0], 0, buffer.size());
struct rt_msghdr* rmh = (struct rt_msghdr*)(&buffer[0]);
rmh->rtm_msglen = sizeof(struct rt_msghdr) + sizeof(struct sockaddr_in);
rmh->rtm_version = RTM_VERSION;
rmh->rtm_type = RTM_GET;
rmh->rtm_addrs = RTA_DST;
rmh->rtm_pid = getpid();
rmh->rtm_seq = 1;
struct sockaddr_in* sa_in = (struct sockaddr_in*)(rmh + 1);
sa_in->sin_len = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in);
sa_in->sin_family = AF_INET;

int status;
if ((status = send(sd, rmh, rmh->rtm_msglen, 0) < 0) {
// process errno
// * issue happens here when not connected to a network
}

// receive kernel response(s)
// process responses

close(sd);


I verified that the process ID (pid) is being set correctly in the header. netstat -nr returns the default route without issue when not connected to a network. I'm having trouble understanding why this code is dependent on network connectivity.










share|improve this question







New contributor




TekuConcept is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Don't have a Mac OS X box to test on, but I'm somewhat surprised netstat shows a default route w/o a network — I'd expect there not to be one (and that the error you're getting means as much). Curious what netstat gives as the default route.
    – derobert
    Nov 29 at 20:51










  • @derobert That's reassuring to hear! These are the results of netstat on OSX without a network connection default - fe80::%utun0 - UGcI - utun0 in the format "Destination, Gateway, Flags, Netif Expire"
    – TekuConcept
    Nov 29 at 21:08










  • fe80:: is an IPv6 address, but you're asking for IPv4 (AF_INET). So probably you'd get that if you asked for AF_INET6 (and changed to sockaddr_in6, etc.).
    – derobert
    Nov 29 at 21:13










  • [BTW: You'll probably find much more knowledge about programming the OSX/BSD APIs on Stack Overflow — you should consider asking there, presuming of course someone else hasn't already asked. ]
    – derobert
    Nov 29 at 21:38










  • Okay, I updated my code to try for the IPv6 route if the IPv4 route failed. Still no luck. :( I was about to ask on SO, but figured this was more specific to BSD. I'll ask there and see what I can dig up.
    – TekuConcept
    Nov 29 at 21:43















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












When I am connected to a network, I can send a struct rt_msghdr* to the kernel and receive a corresponding route. However, when I disconnect from the network and try to send the same route message header, the socket fails at send() with errno = ESRCH (3) No such process.



Generic code: (Testing on MacOS)



int sd = create_socket(AF_ROUTE, IPPROTO_RAW, AF_UNSPEC);

memset(&buffer[0], 0, buffer.size());
struct rt_msghdr* rmh = (struct rt_msghdr*)(&buffer[0]);
rmh->rtm_msglen = sizeof(struct rt_msghdr) + sizeof(struct sockaddr_in);
rmh->rtm_version = RTM_VERSION;
rmh->rtm_type = RTM_GET;
rmh->rtm_addrs = RTA_DST;
rmh->rtm_pid = getpid();
rmh->rtm_seq = 1;
struct sockaddr_in* sa_in = (struct sockaddr_in*)(rmh + 1);
sa_in->sin_len = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in);
sa_in->sin_family = AF_INET;

int status;
if ((status = send(sd, rmh, rmh->rtm_msglen, 0) < 0) {
// process errno
// * issue happens here when not connected to a network
}

// receive kernel response(s)
// process responses

close(sd);


I verified that the process ID (pid) is being set correctly in the header. netstat -nr returns the default route without issue when not connected to a network. I'm having trouble understanding why this code is dependent on network connectivity.










share|improve this question







New contributor




TekuConcept is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Don't have a Mac OS X box to test on, but I'm somewhat surprised netstat shows a default route w/o a network — I'd expect there not to be one (and that the error you're getting means as much). Curious what netstat gives as the default route.
    – derobert
    Nov 29 at 20:51










  • @derobert That's reassuring to hear! These are the results of netstat on OSX without a network connection default - fe80::%utun0 - UGcI - utun0 in the format "Destination, Gateway, Flags, Netif Expire"
    – TekuConcept
    Nov 29 at 21:08










  • fe80:: is an IPv6 address, but you're asking for IPv4 (AF_INET). So probably you'd get that if you asked for AF_INET6 (and changed to sockaddr_in6, etc.).
    – derobert
    Nov 29 at 21:13










  • [BTW: You'll probably find much more knowledge about programming the OSX/BSD APIs on Stack Overflow — you should consider asking there, presuming of course someone else hasn't already asked. ]
    – derobert
    Nov 29 at 21:38










  • Okay, I updated my code to try for the IPv6 route if the IPv4 route failed. Still no luck. :( I was about to ask on SO, but figured this was more specific to BSD. I'll ask there and see what I can dig up.
    – TekuConcept
    Nov 29 at 21:43













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











When I am connected to a network, I can send a struct rt_msghdr* to the kernel and receive a corresponding route. However, when I disconnect from the network and try to send the same route message header, the socket fails at send() with errno = ESRCH (3) No such process.



Generic code: (Testing on MacOS)



int sd = create_socket(AF_ROUTE, IPPROTO_RAW, AF_UNSPEC);

memset(&buffer[0], 0, buffer.size());
struct rt_msghdr* rmh = (struct rt_msghdr*)(&buffer[0]);
rmh->rtm_msglen = sizeof(struct rt_msghdr) + sizeof(struct sockaddr_in);
rmh->rtm_version = RTM_VERSION;
rmh->rtm_type = RTM_GET;
rmh->rtm_addrs = RTA_DST;
rmh->rtm_pid = getpid();
rmh->rtm_seq = 1;
struct sockaddr_in* sa_in = (struct sockaddr_in*)(rmh + 1);
sa_in->sin_len = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in);
sa_in->sin_family = AF_INET;

int status;
if ((status = send(sd, rmh, rmh->rtm_msglen, 0) < 0) {
// process errno
// * issue happens here when not connected to a network
}

// receive kernel response(s)
// process responses

close(sd);


I verified that the process ID (pid) is being set correctly in the header. netstat -nr returns the default route without issue when not connected to a network. I'm having trouble understanding why this code is dependent on network connectivity.










share|improve this question







New contributor




TekuConcept is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











When I am connected to a network, I can send a struct rt_msghdr* to the kernel and receive a corresponding route. However, when I disconnect from the network and try to send the same route message header, the socket fails at send() with errno = ESRCH (3) No such process.



Generic code: (Testing on MacOS)



int sd = create_socket(AF_ROUTE, IPPROTO_RAW, AF_UNSPEC);

memset(&buffer[0], 0, buffer.size());
struct rt_msghdr* rmh = (struct rt_msghdr*)(&buffer[0]);
rmh->rtm_msglen = sizeof(struct rt_msghdr) + sizeof(struct sockaddr_in);
rmh->rtm_version = RTM_VERSION;
rmh->rtm_type = RTM_GET;
rmh->rtm_addrs = RTA_DST;
rmh->rtm_pid = getpid();
rmh->rtm_seq = 1;
struct sockaddr_in* sa_in = (struct sockaddr_in*)(rmh + 1);
sa_in->sin_len = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in);
sa_in->sin_family = AF_INET;

int status;
if ((status = send(sd, rmh, rmh->rtm_msglen, 0) < 0) {
// process errno
// * issue happens here when not connected to a network
}

// receive kernel response(s)
// process responses

close(sd);


I verified that the process ID (pid) is being set correctly in the header. netstat -nr returns the default route without issue when not connected to a network. I'm having trouble understanding why this code is dependent on network connectivity.







networking c route bsd






share|improve this question







New contributor




TekuConcept is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




TekuConcept is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




TekuConcept is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Nov 29 at 20:34









TekuConcept

1111




1111




New contributor




TekuConcept is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





TekuConcept is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






TekuConcept is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Don't have a Mac OS X box to test on, but I'm somewhat surprised netstat shows a default route w/o a network — I'd expect there not to be one (and that the error you're getting means as much). Curious what netstat gives as the default route.
    – derobert
    Nov 29 at 20:51










  • @derobert That's reassuring to hear! These are the results of netstat on OSX without a network connection default - fe80::%utun0 - UGcI - utun0 in the format "Destination, Gateway, Flags, Netif Expire"
    – TekuConcept
    Nov 29 at 21:08










  • fe80:: is an IPv6 address, but you're asking for IPv4 (AF_INET). So probably you'd get that if you asked for AF_INET6 (and changed to sockaddr_in6, etc.).
    – derobert
    Nov 29 at 21:13










  • [BTW: You'll probably find much more knowledge about programming the OSX/BSD APIs on Stack Overflow — you should consider asking there, presuming of course someone else hasn't already asked. ]
    – derobert
    Nov 29 at 21:38










  • Okay, I updated my code to try for the IPv6 route if the IPv4 route failed. Still no luck. :( I was about to ask on SO, but figured this was more specific to BSD. I'll ask there and see what I can dig up.
    – TekuConcept
    Nov 29 at 21:43


















  • Don't have a Mac OS X box to test on, but I'm somewhat surprised netstat shows a default route w/o a network — I'd expect there not to be one (and that the error you're getting means as much). Curious what netstat gives as the default route.
    – derobert
    Nov 29 at 20:51










  • @derobert That's reassuring to hear! These are the results of netstat on OSX without a network connection default - fe80::%utun0 - UGcI - utun0 in the format "Destination, Gateway, Flags, Netif Expire"
    – TekuConcept
    Nov 29 at 21:08










  • fe80:: is an IPv6 address, but you're asking for IPv4 (AF_INET). So probably you'd get that if you asked for AF_INET6 (and changed to sockaddr_in6, etc.).
    – derobert
    Nov 29 at 21:13










  • [BTW: You'll probably find much more knowledge about programming the OSX/BSD APIs on Stack Overflow — you should consider asking there, presuming of course someone else hasn't already asked. ]
    – derobert
    Nov 29 at 21:38










  • Okay, I updated my code to try for the IPv6 route if the IPv4 route failed. Still no luck. :( I was about to ask on SO, but figured this was more specific to BSD. I'll ask there and see what I can dig up.
    – TekuConcept
    Nov 29 at 21:43
















Don't have a Mac OS X box to test on, but I'm somewhat surprised netstat shows a default route w/o a network — I'd expect there not to be one (and that the error you're getting means as much). Curious what netstat gives as the default route.
– derobert
Nov 29 at 20:51




Don't have a Mac OS X box to test on, but I'm somewhat surprised netstat shows a default route w/o a network — I'd expect there not to be one (and that the error you're getting means as much). Curious what netstat gives as the default route.
– derobert
Nov 29 at 20:51












@derobert That's reassuring to hear! These are the results of netstat on OSX without a network connection default - fe80::%utun0 - UGcI - utun0 in the format "Destination, Gateway, Flags, Netif Expire"
– TekuConcept
Nov 29 at 21:08




@derobert That's reassuring to hear! These are the results of netstat on OSX without a network connection default - fe80::%utun0 - UGcI - utun0 in the format "Destination, Gateway, Flags, Netif Expire"
– TekuConcept
Nov 29 at 21:08












fe80:: is an IPv6 address, but you're asking for IPv4 (AF_INET). So probably you'd get that if you asked for AF_INET6 (and changed to sockaddr_in6, etc.).
– derobert
Nov 29 at 21:13




fe80:: is an IPv6 address, but you're asking for IPv4 (AF_INET). So probably you'd get that if you asked for AF_INET6 (and changed to sockaddr_in6, etc.).
– derobert
Nov 29 at 21:13












[BTW: You'll probably find much more knowledge about programming the OSX/BSD APIs on Stack Overflow — you should consider asking there, presuming of course someone else hasn't already asked. ]
– derobert
Nov 29 at 21:38




[BTW: You'll probably find much more knowledge about programming the OSX/BSD APIs on Stack Overflow — you should consider asking there, presuming of course someone else hasn't already asked. ]
– derobert
Nov 29 at 21:38












Okay, I updated my code to try for the IPv6 route if the IPv4 route failed. Still no luck. :( I was about to ask on SO, but figured this was more specific to BSD. I'll ask there and see what I can dig up.
– TekuConcept
Nov 29 at 21:43




Okay, I updated my code to try for the IPv6 route if the IPv4 route failed. Still no luck. :( I was about to ask on SO, but figured this was more specific to BSD. I'll ask there and see what I can dig up.
– TekuConcept
Nov 29 at 21:43















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






TekuConcept is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485015%2fno-such-process-3-when-not-connected-to-a-network-af-route%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








TekuConcept is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















TekuConcept is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













TekuConcept is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












TekuConcept is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485015%2fno-such-process-3-when-not-connected-to-a-network-af-route%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Accessing regular linux commands in Huawei's Dopra Linux

Can't connect RFCOMM socket: Host is down

Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal Exception in Interrupt