What is Ve in mosfet
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In this curve that shows the operating regions of the mosfet
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
transistors mosfet
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In this curve that shows the operating regions of the mosfet
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
transistors mosfet
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In this curve that shows the operating regions of the mosfet
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
transistors mosfet
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
In this curve that shows the operating regions of the mosfet
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
transistors mosfet
transistors mosfet
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 14 hours ago
Gh-B
264
264
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
9 hours ago
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
9 hours ago
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
9 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".
So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive)
.
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
14 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
14 hours ago
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
14 hours ago
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
13 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".
So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive)
.
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
14 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".
So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive)
.
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
14 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".
So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive)
.
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".
So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive)
.
answered 14 hours ago
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d61ef/d61ef4c379eb1678bb28c8bd2a7bea3860d726ba" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d61ef/d61ef4c379eb1678bb28c8bd2a7bea3860d726ba" alt=""
Andy aka
235k10173401
235k10173401
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
14 hours ago
add a comment |
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
14 hours ago
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
14 hours ago
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
14 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
14 hours ago
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
14 hours ago
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
13 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
14 hours ago
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
14 hours ago
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
13 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".
"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".
answered 14 hours ago
Felthry
3,338929
3,338929
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
14 hours ago
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
14 hours ago
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
13 hours ago
add a comment |
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
14 hours ago
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
14 hours ago
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
13 hours ago
2
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
14 hours ago
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
14 hours ago
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
14 hours ago
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
14 hours ago
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Felthry
14 hours ago
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
13 hours ago
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
13 hours ago
add a comment |
Gh-B is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gh-B is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gh-B is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gh-B is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f408914%2fwhat-is-ve-in-mosfet%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
9 hours ago