“placed each of the four people in the four chairs” make sense?
Harry looked up at Crouch and saw that he looked gaunter and grayer than ever before. A nerve was twitching in his temple.
“Bring them in,” he said, and his voice echoed through the silent
dungeon.
The door in the corner opened yet again. Six dementors entered this
time, flanking a group of four people. Harry saw the people in the
crowd turn to look up at Mr. Crouch. A few of them whispered to one
another.
The dementors placed each of the four people in the four chairs with chained arms that now stood on the dungeon floor.
There was a thickset man who stared blankly up at Crouch; a thinner and more nervous-looking man, whose eyes were darting around the crowd; a woman with thick, shining dark hair and heavily hooded eyes, who was sitting in the chained chair as though it were a throne; and a boy in his late teens, who looked nothing short of petrified. ...
I feel "placed each of the four people in the four chairs" doesn't sound quite right. Either "placed each of the four people in each of the four chairs" or "placed the four people in the four chairs" makes more sense to me.
Any thought about it?
-- Excerpted from Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
sentence-construction
edited 1 hour ago
ColleenV♦
10.4k53159
asked 2 hours ago
dan
4,46622565
add a comment |
Harry looked up at Crouch and saw that he looked gaunter and grayer than ever before. A nerve was twitching in his temple.
“Bring them in,” he said, and his voice echoed through the silent
dungeon.
The door in the corner opened yet again. Six dementors entered this
time, flanking a group of four people. Harry saw the people in the
crowd turn to look up at Mr. Crouch. A few of them whispered to one
another.
The dementors placed each of the four people in the four chairs with chained arms that now stood on the dungeon floor.
There was a thickset man who stared blankly up at Crouch; a thinner and more nervous-looking man, whose eyes were darting around the crowd; a woman with thick, shining dark hair and heavily hooded eyes, who was sitting in the chained chair as though it were a throne; and a boy in his late teens, who looked nothing short of petrified. ...
I feel "placed each of the four people in the four chairs" doesn't sound quite right. Either "placed each of the four people in each of the four chairs" or "placed the four people in the four chairs" makes more sense to me.
Any thought about it?
-- Excerpted from Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
sentence-construction
edited 1 hour ago
ColleenV♦
10.4k53159
asked 2 hours ago
dan
4,46622565
Is there something in the earlier context which explains now stood? Did those chairs materialize out of thin air or something?
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
1 hour ago
@Tᴚoɯɐuo, I added more context. Previous context indicated that usually there was only one chair, and now this time there were four chairs.
– dan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Harry looked up at Crouch and saw that he looked gaunter and grayer than ever before. A nerve was twitching in his temple.
“Bring them in,” he said, and his voice echoed through the silent
dungeon.
The door in the corner opened yet again. Six dementors entered this
time, flanking a group of four people. Harry saw the people in the
crowd turn to look up at Mr. Crouch. A few of them whispered to one
another.
The dementors placed each of the four people in the four chairs with chained arms that now stood on the dungeon floor.
There was a thickset man who stared blankly up at Crouch; a thinner and more nervous-looking man, whose eyes were darting around the crowd; a woman with thick, shining dark hair and heavily hooded eyes, who was sitting in the chained chair as though it were a throne; and a boy in his late teens, who looked nothing short of petrified. ...
I feel "placed each of the four people in the four chairs" doesn't sound quite right. Either "placed each of the four people in each of the four chairs" or "placed the four people in the four chairs" makes more sense to me.
Any thought about it?
-- Excerpted from Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
sentence-construction
edited 1 hour ago
ColleenV♦
10.4k53159
asked 2 hours ago
dan
4,46622565
Harry looked up at Crouch and saw that he looked gaunter and grayer than ever before. A nerve was twitching in his temple.
“Bring them in,” he said, and his voice echoed through the silent
dungeon.
The door in the corner opened yet again. Six dementors entered this
time, flanking a group of four people. Harry saw the people in the
crowd turn to look up at Mr. Crouch. A few of them whispered to one
another.
The dementors placed each of the four people in the four chairs with chained arms that now stood on the dungeon floor.
There was a thickset man who stared blankly up at Crouch; a thinner and more nervous-looking man, whose eyes were darting around the crowd; a woman with thick, shining dark hair and heavily hooded eyes, who was sitting in the chained chair as though it were a throne; and a boy in his late teens, who looked nothing short of petrified. ...
I feel "placed each of the four people in the four chairs" doesn't sound quite right. Either "placed each of the four people in each of the four chairs" or "placed the four people in the four chairs" makes more sense to me.
Any thought about it?
-- Excerpted from Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
sentence-construction
sentence-construction
edited 1 hour ago
ColleenV♦
10.4k53159
asked 2 hours ago
dan
4,46622565
edited 1 hour ago
ColleenV♦
10.4k53159
asked 2 hours ago
dan
4,46622565
edited 1 hour ago
ColleenV♦
10.4k53159
edited 1 hour ago
ColleenV♦
10.4k53159
edited 1 hour ago
ColleenV♦
10.4k53159
10.4k53159
asked 2 hours ago
dan
4,46622565
asked 2 hours ago
dan
4,46622565
asked 2 hours ago
dan
4,46622565
4,46622565
Is there something in the earlier context which explains now stood? Did those chairs materialize out of thin air or something?
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
1 hour ago
@Tᴚoɯɐuo, I added more context. Previous context indicated that usually there was only one chair, and now this time there were four chairs.
– dan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Is there something in the earlier context which explains now stood? Did those chairs materialize out of thin air or something?
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
1 hour ago
@Tᴚoɯɐuo, I added more context. Previous context indicated that usually there was only one chair, and now this time there were four chairs.
– dan
1 hour ago
Is there something in the earlier context which explains now stood? Did those chairs materialize out of thin air or something?
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
1 hour ago
Is there something in the earlier context which explains now stood? Did those chairs materialize out of thin air or something?
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
1 hour ago
@Tᴚoɯɐuo, I added more context. Previous context indicated that usually there was only one chair, and now this time there were four chairs.
– dan
1 hour ago
@Tᴚoɯɐuo, I added more context. Previous context indicated that usually there was only one chair, and now this time there were four chairs.
– dan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The original and both of your alternatives sound to me like all the people were placed in all the chairs, a lump of four people on a stack of four chairs. Uncomfortable, to be sure, and perhaps not physically possible.
What is obviously intended is that there were four separate people placed into four separate chairs, one person to a chair. I can think of a handful of ways to re-phrase the original, the prominent being, "...placed each of the four people in one of the four chairs..."
However, the original at least provides an ambiguity, the possibility of either all four people together on all four chairs together, or four people and four chairs, one person per chair. We must allow our intuition to help us resolve this ambiguity, and that seems to be what Ms. Rawling (the author) is expecting here.
answered 2 hours ago
cobaltduck
30116
Is there any difference between "placed each of the four people in each of the four chairs" and "...placed each of the four people in one of the four chairs..."? I feel they are pretty much the same.
– dan
1 hour ago
@dan Perhaps it's a national/ regional difference thing (I'm from midwest U.S., not sure where you're from). To me, the each/each version implies lumping together, and the each/one version implies one-to-one.
– cobaltduck
1 hour ago
Thanks! I'm just an English language learner. I want to know what native speakers take for it.
– dan
1 hour ago
1
@dan There are a lot of times when we don't follow our own rules very strictly. In this context, the actual words are a little bit ambiguous, but since the idea of putting each person in four different chairs is ridiculous, we just assume correctly that each person gets one chair.
– Darth Pseudonym
46 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f191087%2fplaced-each-of-the-four-people-in-the-four-chairs-make-sense%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The original and both of your alternatives sound to me like all the people were placed in all the chairs, a lump of four people on a stack of four chairs. Uncomfortable, to be sure, and perhaps not physically possible.
What is obviously intended is that there were four separate people placed into four separate chairs, one person to a chair. I can think of a handful of ways to re-phrase the original, the prominent being, "...placed each of the four people in one of the four chairs..."
However, the original at least provides an ambiguity, the possibility of either all four people together on all four chairs together, or four people and four chairs, one person per chair. We must allow our intuition to help us resolve this ambiguity, and that seems to be what Ms. Rawling (the author) is expecting here.
answered 2 hours ago
cobaltduck
30116
Is there any difference between "placed each of the four people in each of the four chairs" and "...placed each of the four people in one of the four chairs..."? I feel they are pretty much the same.
– dan
1 hour ago
@dan Perhaps it's a national/ regional difference thing (I'm from midwest U.S., not sure where you're from). To me, the each/each version implies lumping together, and the each/one version implies one-to-one.
– cobaltduck
1 hour ago
Thanks! I'm just an English language learner. I want to know what native speakers take for it.
– dan
1 hour ago
1
@dan There are a lot of times when we don't follow our own rules very strictly. In this context, the actual words are a little bit ambiguous, but since the idea of putting each person in four different chairs is ridiculous, we just assume correctly that each person gets one chair.
– Darth Pseudonym
46 mins ago
add a comment |
The original and both of your alternatives sound to me like all the people were placed in all the chairs, a lump of four people on a stack of four chairs. Uncomfortable, to be sure, and perhaps not physically possible.
What is obviously intended is that there were four separate people placed into four separate chairs, one person to a chair. I can think of a handful of ways to re-phrase the original, the prominent being, "...placed each of the four people in one of the four chairs..."
However, the original at least provides an ambiguity, the possibility of either all four people together on all four chairs together, or four people and four chairs, one person per chair. We must allow our intuition to help us resolve this ambiguity, and that seems to be what Ms. Rawling (the author) is expecting here.
answered 2 hours ago
cobaltduck
30116
Is there any difference between "placed each of the four people in each of the four chairs" and "...placed each of the four people in one of the four chairs..."? I feel they are pretty much the same.
– dan
1 hour ago
@dan Perhaps it's a national/ regional difference thing (I'm from midwest U.S., not sure where you're from). To me, the each/each version implies lumping together, and the each/one version implies one-to-one.
– cobaltduck
1 hour ago
Thanks! I'm just an English language learner. I want to know what native speakers take for it.
– dan
1 hour ago
1
@dan There are a lot of times when we don't follow our own rules very strictly. In this context, the actual words are a little bit ambiguous, but since the idea of putting each person in four different chairs is ridiculous, we just assume correctly that each person gets one chair.
– Darth Pseudonym
46 mins ago
add a comment |
The original and both of your alternatives sound to me like all the people were placed in all the chairs, a lump of four people on a stack of four chairs. Uncomfortable, to be sure, and perhaps not physically possible.
What is obviously intended is that there were four separate people placed into four separate chairs, one person to a chair. I can think of a handful of ways to re-phrase the original, the prominent being, "...placed each of the four people in one of the four chairs..."
However, the original at least provides an ambiguity, the possibility of either all four people together on all four chairs together, or four people and four chairs, one person per chair. We must allow our intuition to help us resolve this ambiguity, and that seems to be what Ms. Rawling (the author) is expecting here.
answered 2 hours ago
cobaltduck
30116
The original and both of your alternatives sound to me like all the people were placed in all the chairs, a lump of four people on a stack of four chairs. Uncomfortable, to be sure, and perhaps not physically possible.
What is obviously intended is that there were four separate people placed into four separate chairs, one person to a chair. I can think of a handful of ways to re-phrase the original, the prominent being, "...placed each of the four people in one of the four chairs..."
However, the original at least provides an ambiguity, the possibility of either all four people together on all four chairs together, or four people and four chairs, one person per chair. We must allow our intuition to help us resolve this ambiguity, and that seems to be what Ms. Rawling (the author) is expecting here.
answered 2 hours ago
cobaltduck
30116
answered 2 hours ago
cobaltduck
30116
answered 2 hours ago
cobaltduck
30116
answered 2 hours ago
cobaltduck
30116
30116
Is there any difference between "placed each of the four people in each of the four chairs" and "...placed each of the four people in one of the four chairs..."? I feel they are pretty much the same.
– dan
1 hour ago
@dan Perhaps it's a national/ regional difference thing (I'm from midwest U.S., not sure where you're from). To me, the each/each version implies lumping together, and the each/one version implies one-to-one.
– cobaltduck
1 hour ago
Thanks! I'm just an English language learner. I want to know what native speakers take for it.
– dan
1 hour ago
1
@dan There are a lot of times when we don't follow our own rules very strictly. In this context, the actual words are a little bit ambiguous, but since the idea of putting each person in four different chairs is ridiculous, we just assume correctly that each person gets one chair.
– Darth Pseudonym
46 mins ago
add a comment |
Is there any difference between "placed each of the four people in each of the four chairs" and "...placed each of the four people in one of the four chairs..."? I feel they are pretty much the same.
– dan
1 hour ago
@dan Perhaps it's a national/ regional difference thing (I'm from midwest U.S., not sure where you're from). To me, the each/each version implies lumping together, and the each/one version implies one-to-one.
– cobaltduck
1 hour ago
Thanks! I'm just an English language learner. I want to know what native speakers take for it.
– dan
1 hour ago
1
@dan There are a lot of times when we don't follow our own rules very strictly. In this context, the actual words are a little bit ambiguous, but since the idea of putting each person in four different chairs is ridiculous, we just assume correctly that each person gets one chair.
– Darth Pseudonym
46 mins ago
Is there any difference between "placed each of the four people in each of the four chairs" and "...placed each of the four people in one of the four chairs..."? I feel they are pretty much the same.
– dan
1 hour ago
Is there any difference between "placed each of the four people in each of the four chairs" and "...placed each of the four people in one of the four chairs..."? I feel they are pretty much the same.
– dan
1 hour ago
@dan Perhaps it's a national/ regional difference thing (I'm from midwest U.S., not sure where you're from). To me, the each/each version implies lumping together, and the each/one version implies one-to-one.
– cobaltduck
1 hour ago
@dan Perhaps it's a national/ regional difference thing (I'm from midwest U.S., not sure where you're from). To me, the each/each version implies lumping together, and the each/one version implies one-to-one.
– cobaltduck
1 hour ago
Thanks! I'm just an English language learner. I want to know what native speakers take for it.
– dan
1 hour ago
Thanks! I'm just an English language learner. I want to know what native speakers take for it.
– dan
1 hour ago
1
1
@dan There are a lot of times when we don't follow our own rules very strictly. In this context, the actual words are a little bit ambiguous, but since the idea of putting each person in four different chairs is ridiculous, we just assume correctly that each person gets one chair.
– Darth Pseudonym
46 mins ago
@dan There are a lot of times when we don't follow our own rules very strictly. In this context, the actual words are a little bit ambiguous, but since the idea of putting each person in four different chairs is ridiculous, we just assume correctly that each person gets one chair.
– Darth Pseudonym
46 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f191087%2fplaced-each-of-the-four-people-in-the-four-chairs-make-sense%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Is there something in the earlier context which explains now stood? Did those chairs materialize out of thin air or something?
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
1 hour ago
@Tᴚoɯɐuo, I added more context. Previous context indicated that usually there was only one chair, and now this time there were four chairs.
– dan
1 hour ago