How to debuild (Debian) Apache without it performing a clean
I am trying to edit an Apache module on Debian (strictly, I'm doing this on Raspbian Jessie-Lite), and am broadly following the Debian build instructions:
$ mkdir -p ~/src/debian; cd ~/src/debian
$ apt-get source apache2-bin
$ cd apache2-2.4.10
$ debuild -b -uc -us
And the build process takes roughly one and a half hours on an olde original Pi. Which is fine. Once!
But I believe the build process is performing a make clean
and so after a minor edit of a single mod_*.c file, it wants to rebuild the entire thing, which is kind of slowing down my development!
I have tried adding -dc
to the debuild
command, but then it didn't build anything. I even tried deleting the target mod_*.so file to "encourage" it into rebuilding it, but still no!
UPDATE 2016-08-21: Adding -nc to the debuild command does not cause modules to be recompiled. Here's the output from that command:
$ debuild -b -uc -us -nc
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc -b -nc
dpkg-buildpackage: source package apache2
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 2.4.10-10+deb8u5
dpkg-buildpackage: source distribution jessie-security
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
dpkg-source --before-build apache2-2.4.10
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture armhf
debian/rules build
dh build --parallel --with autotools_dev
fakeroot debian/rules binary
dh binary --parallel --with autotools_dev
dpkg-genchanges -b >../apache2_2.4.10-10+deb8u5_armhf.changes
dpkg-genchanges: binary-only upload (no source code included)
dpkg-source --after-build apache2-2.4.10
dpkg-buildpackage: binary-only upload (no source included)
Now running lintian...
N: 16 tags overridden (1 error, 4 warnings, 11 info)
Finished running lintian.
debian apache-httpd compiling raspbian c
add a comment |
I am trying to edit an Apache module on Debian (strictly, I'm doing this on Raspbian Jessie-Lite), and am broadly following the Debian build instructions:
$ mkdir -p ~/src/debian; cd ~/src/debian
$ apt-get source apache2-bin
$ cd apache2-2.4.10
$ debuild -b -uc -us
And the build process takes roughly one and a half hours on an olde original Pi. Which is fine. Once!
But I believe the build process is performing a make clean
and so after a minor edit of a single mod_*.c file, it wants to rebuild the entire thing, which is kind of slowing down my development!
I have tried adding -dc
to the debuild
command, but then it didn't build anything. I even tried deleting the target mod_*.so file to "encourage" it into rebuilding it, but still no!
UPDATE 2016-08-21: Adding -nc to the debuild command does not cause modules to be recompiled. Here's the output from that command:
$ debuild -b -uc -us -nc
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc -b -nc
dpkg-buildpackage: source package apache2
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 2.4.10-10+deb8u5
dpkg-buildpackage: source distribution jessie-security
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
dpkg-source --before-build apache2-2.4.10
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture armhf
debian/rules build
dh build --parallel --with autotools_dev
fakeroot debian/rules binary
dh binary --parallel --with autotools_dev
dpkg-genchanges -b >../apache2_2.4.10-10+deb8u5_armhf.changes
dpkg-genchanges: binary-only upload (no source code included)
dpkg-source --after-build apache2-2.4.10
dpkg-buildpackage: binary-only upload (no source included)
Now running lintian...
N: 16 tags overridden (1 error, 4 warnings, 11 info)
Finished running lintian.
debian apache-httpd compiling raspbian c
add a comment |
I am trying to edit an Apache module on Debian (strictly, I'm doing this on Raspbian Jessie-Lite), and am broadly following the Debian build instructions:
$ mkdir -p ~/src/debian; cd ~/src/debian
$ apt-get source apache2-bin
$ cd apache2-2.4.10
$ debuild -b -uc -us
And the build process takes roughly one and a half hours on an olde original Pi. Which is fine. Once!
But I believe the build process is performing a make clean
and so after a minor edit of a single mod_*.c file, it wants to rebuild the entire thing, which is kind of slowing down my development!
I have tried adding -dc
to the debuild
command, but then it didn't build anything. I even tried deleting the target mod_*.so file to "encourage" it into rebuilding it, but still no!
UPDATE 2016-08-21: Adding -nc to the debuild command does not cause modules to be recompiled. Here's the output from that command:
$ debuild -b -uc -us -nc
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc -b -nc
dpkg-buildpackage: source package apache2
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 2.4.10-10+deb8u5
dpkg-buildpackage: source distribution jessie-security
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
dpkg-source --before-build apache2-2.4.10
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture armhf
debian/rules build
dh build --parallel --with autotools_dev
fakeroot debian/rules binary
dh binary --parallel --with autotools_dev
dpkg-genchanges -b >../apache2_2.4.10-10+deb8u5_armhf.changes
dpkg-genchanges: binary-only upload (no source code included)
dpkg-source --after-build apache2-2.4.10
dpkg-buildpackage: binary-only upload (no source included)
Now running lintian...
N: 16 tags overridden (1 error, 4 warnings, 11 info)
Finished running lintian.
debian apache-httpd compiling raspbian c
I am trying to edit an Apache module on Debian (strictly, I'm doing this on Raspbian Jessie-Lite), and am broadly following the Debian build instructions:
$ mkdir -p ~/src/debian; cd ~/src/debian
$ apt-get source apache2-bin
$ cd apache2-2.4.10
$ debuild -b -uc -us
And the build process takes roughly one and a half hours on an olde original Pi. Which is fine. Once!
But I believe the build process is performing a make clean
and so after a minor edit of a single mod_*.c file, it wants to rebuild the entire thing, which is kind of slowing down my development!
I have tried adding -dc
to the debuild
command, but then it didn't build anything. I even tried deleting the target mod_*.so file to "encourage" it into rebuilding it, but still no!
UPDATE 2016-08-21: Adding -nc to the debuild command does not cause modules to be recompiled. Here's the output from that command:
$ debuild -b -uc -us -nc
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc -b -nc
dpkg-buildpackage: source package apache2
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 2.4.10-10+deb8u5
dpkg-buildpackage: source distribution jessie-security
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
dpkg-source --before-build apache2-2.4.10
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture armhf
debian/rules build
dh build --parallel --with autotools_dev
fakeroot debian/rules binary
dh binary --parallel --with autotools_dev
dpkg-genchanges -b >../apache2_2.4.10-10+deb8u5_armhf.changes
dpkg-genchanges: binary-only upload (no source code included)
dpkg-source --after-build apache2-2.4.10
dpkg-buildpackage: binary-only upload (no source included)
Now running lintian...
N: 16 tags overridden (1 error, 4 warnings, 11 info)
Finished running lintian.
debian apache-httpd compiling raspbian c
debian apache-httpd compiling raspbian c
edited Aug 25 at 21:41
Rui F Ribeiro
38.8k1479128
38.8k1479128
asked Aug 20 '16 at 1:22
Peter Ryan
5017
5017
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Add the -nc
option to your debuild
command line. This may expose problems in the build system or the packaging though, so be prepared. But for small fixes it usually works fine.
However, as the apache2
source package uses debhelper (like many other packages), this alone is not enough, because debhelper also keeps its own journal of completed steps in separate log files for each binary package. These can be removed entirely by dh_clean
. But to get debhelper redo no more than the necessary work, truncate only the relevant one by
sed -i '/^dh_auto_build$/Q' debian/apache2-bin.debhelper.log
before running debuild -nc
.
Thank you too for your reply! It didn't work though! :D In fact, the output, and the duration taken were identical to removing the clean bits from debian/rules. I've updated the question with the output from debuild with -nc in case it helps.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 23:00
What happens if you invoke plainmake
in the top level source directory after making your code changes? If that rebuilds what you need, trydebuild -nc
after that.
– Ferenc Wágner
Aug 24 '16 at 8:16
make
does do something; it compiles bits in[top-level-source]/modules/mappers/.libs/
but the .so file in there is larger than the .so file that is installed (9.4K vs 35K). However, the file that a fulldebuild
builds ends up in[top-level-source]/debian/apache2-bin/usr/lib/apache2/modules/
. So my doing amake
followed bydebuild -nc
didn't result in a file I could install.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 25 '16 at 22:13
I'm might be saying what you already know, but it seems to me that there's the Apache distribution, along with all it's make files, and then there's the Debian patches and its makes files... and the two are separate? And I'm also wondering if the Debian stuff doesn't just recompile everything because easier/safer to do so! Maybe?!
– Peter Ryan
Aug 25 '16 at 22:16
The size difference is probably the result of stripping. Anyway, this in encouraging. Now, runsed -i '/^dh_auto_build$/Q' debian/apache2-bin.debhelper.log
(supposing your changes concern theapache2-bin
binary package). Then rundebuild -nc
.
– Ferenc Wágner
Aug 26 '16 at 7:17
|
show 1 more comment
Inside the debian directory there's a rules file. It's a essentially a make file. If you remove all the directives about cleaning and then add
override_dh_clean:
And put nothing in it no cleaning will happen (at all). Be careful though this might cause build problems, not likely but might. Another alternative is to not change anything and use the -j option to do a parallel build. Not sure the advantage that'd give on a raspberry pi.
Rules file should look like this:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-apache/apache2.git/tree/debian/rules
Thanks for your reply! I've tried editing debian/rules, but whilst it is much quicker (less than 7 minutes), it doesn't re-compile the module I've edited.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 17:22
Having had a look around, there's a lot of .mk files in there too, but I'm utterly lost as to what calls what and when!
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 17:25
add a comment |
I had a similar problem; Scite debian package has in debian/rules
:
...
BUILD_DATE="$(date --utc --date="@${SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH:-$(date +%s)}" "+%b %d %Y %T")"
override CPPFLAGS += -DBUILD_DATE=""$(BUILD_DATE)""
%:
dh $@
override_dh_auto_build:
dh_auto_build --sourcedirectory=scintilla/gtk -- GTK3=1 $(BUILD_LUA)
dh_auto_build --sourcedirectory=scite/gtk -- gnomeprefix=/usr GTK3=1 $(BUILD_LUA)
....
Essentially, override_dh_auto_build
calls the make, which detects changed source files and rebuilds only changed ones. However, even if debian/rules
sets BUILD_DATE
, running:
fakeroot debian/rules -j$(nproc) override_dh_auto_build
... will fail at some cpp source files that use BUILD_DATE as a define. The solution is to explicitly specify this variable on the command line call:
fakeroot debian/rules -j$(nproc) CPPFLAGS+=-DBUILD_DATE="" override_dh_auto_build
... and then compilation passes (additional bonus is that a new .deb is not created, so you don't have to wait for that). Essentially, this helps to rerun just the rebuild process for changed files that gives you the .so/.exe, without packaging a .deb.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f304590%2fhow-to-debuild-debian-apache-without-it-performing-a-clean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Add the -nc
option to your debuild
command line. This may expose problems in the build system or the packaging though, so be prepared. But for small fixes it usually works fine.
However, as the apache2
source package uses debhelper (like many other packages), this alone is not enough, because debhelper also keeps its own journal of completed steps in separate log files for each binary package. These can be removed entirely by dh_clean
. But to get debhelper redo no more than the necessary work, truncate only the relevant one by
sed -i '/^dh_auto_build$/Q' debian/apache2-bin.debhelper.log
before running debuild -nc
.
Thank you too for your reply! It didn't work though! :D In fact, the output, and the duration taken were identical to removing the clean bits from debian/rules. I've updated the question with the output from debuild with -nc in case it helps.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 23:00
What happens if you invoke plainmake
in the top level source directory after making your code changes? If that rebuilds what you need, trydebuild -nc
after that.
– Ferenc Wágner
Aug 24 '16 at 8:16
make
does do something; it compiles bits in[top-level-source]/modules/mappers/.libs/
but the .so file in there is larger than the .so file that is installed (9.4K vs 35K). However, the file that a fulldebuild
builds ends up in[top-level-source]/debian/apache2-bin/usr/lib/apache2/modules/
. So my doing amake
followed bydebuild -nc
didn't result in a file I could install.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 25 '16 at 22:13
I'm might be saying what you already know, but it seems to me that there's the Apache distribution, along with all it's make files, and then there's the Debian patches and its makes files... and the two are separate? And I'm also wondering if the Debian stuff doesn't just recompile everything because easier/safer to do so! Maybe?!
– Peter Ryan
Aug 25 '16 at 22:16
The size difference is probably the result of stripping. Anyway, this in encouraging. Now, runsed -i '/^dh_auto_build$/Q' debian/apache2-bin.debhelper.log
(supposing your changes concern theapache2-bin
binary package). Then rundebuild -nc
.
– Ferenc Wágner
Aug 26 '16 at 7:17
|
show 1 more comment
Add the -nc
option to your debuild
command line. This may expose problems in the build system or the packaging though, so be prepared. But for small fixes it usually works fine.
However, as the apache2
source package uses debhelper (like many other packages), this alone is not enough, because debhelper also keeps its own journal of completed steps in separate log files for each binary package. These can be removed entirely by dh_clean
. But to get debhelper redo no more than the necessary work, truncate only the relevant one by
sed -i '/^dh_auto_build$/Q' debian/apache2-bin.debhelper.log
before running debuild -nc
.
Thank you too for your reply! It didn't work though! :D In fact, the output, and the duration taken were identical to removing the clean bits from debian/rules. I've updated the question with the output from debuild with -nc in case it helps.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 23:00
What happens if you invoke plainmake
in the top level source directory after making your code changes? If that rebuilds what you need, trydebuild -nc
after that.
– Ferenc Wágner
Aug 24 '16 at 8:16
make
does do something; it compiles bits in[top-level-source]/modules/mappers/.libs/
but the .so file in there is larger than the .so file that is installed (9.4K vs 35K). However, the file that a fulldebuild
builds ends up in[top-level-source]/debian/apache2-bin/usr/lib/apache2/modules/
. So my doing amake
followed bydebuild -nc
didn't result in a file I could install.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 25 '16 at 22:13
I'm might be saying what you already know, but it seems to me that there's the Apache distribution, along with all it's make files, and then there's the Debian patches and its makes files... and the two are separate? And I'm also wondering if the Debian stuff doesn't just recompile everything because easier/safer to do so! Maybe?!
– Peter Ryan
Aug 25 '16 at 22:16
The size difference is probably the result of stripping. Anyway, this in encouraging. Now, runsed -i '/^dh_auto_build$/Q' debian/apache2-bin.debhelper.log
(supposing your changes concern theapache2-bin
binary package). Then rundebuild -nc
.
– Ferenc Wágner
Aug 26 '16 at 7:17
|
show 1 more comment
Add the -nc
option to your debuild
command line. This may expose problems in the build system or the packaging though, so be prepared. But for small fixes it usually works fine.
However, as the apache2
source package uses debhelper (like many other packages), this alone is not enough, because debhelper also keeps its own journal of completed steps in separate log files for each binary package. These can be removed entirely by dh_clean
. But to get debhelper redo no more than the necessary work, truncate only the relevant one by
sed -i '/^dh_auto_build$/Q' debian/apache2-bin.debhelper.log
before running debuild -nc
.
Add the -nc
option to your debuild
command line. This may expose problems in the build system or the packaging though, so be prepared. But for small fixes it usually works fine.
However, as the apache2
source package uses debhelper (like many other packages), this alone is not enough, because debhelper also keeps its own journal of completed steps in separate log files for each binary package. These can be removed entirely by dh_clean
. But to get debhelper redo no more than the necessary work, truncate only the relevant one by
sed -i '/^dh_auto_build$/Q' debian/apache2-bin.debhelper.log
before running debuild -nc
.
edited Mar 23 '17 at 21:14
answered Aug 21 '16 at 18:51
Ferenc Wágner
2,924920
2,924920
Thank you too for your reply! It didn't work though! :D In fact, the output, and the duration taken were identical to removing the clean bits from debian/rules. I've updated the question with the output from debuild with -nc in case it helps.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 23:00
What happens if you invoke plainmake
in the top level source directory after making your code changes? If that rebuilds what you need, trydebuild -nc
after that.
– Ferenc Wágner
Aug 24 '16 at 8:16
make
does do something; it compiles bits in[top-level-source]/modules/mappers/.libs/
but the .so file in there is larger than the .so file that is installed (9.4K vs 35K). However, the file that a fulldebuild
builds ends up in[top-level-source]/debian/apache2-bin/usr/lib/apache2/modules/
. So my doing amake
followed bydebuild -nc
didn't result in a file I could install.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 25 '16 at 22:13
I'm might be saying what you already know, but it seems to me that there's the Apache distribution, along with all it's make files, and then there's the Debian patches and its makes files... and the two are separate? And I'm also wondering if the Debian stuff doesn't just recompile everything because easier/safer to do so! Maybe?!
– Peter Ryan
Aug 25 '16 at 22:16
The size difference is probably the result of stripping. Anyway, this in encouraging. Now, runsed -i '/^dh_auto_build$/Q' debian/apache2-bin.debhelper.log
(supposing your changes concern theapache2-bin
binary package). Then rundebuild -nc
.
– Ferenc Wágner
Aug 26 '16 at 7:17
|
show 1 more comment
Thank you too for your reply! It didn't work though! :D In fact, the output, and the duration taken were identical to removing the clean bits from debian/rules. I've updated the question with the output from debuild with -nc in case it helps.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 23:00
What happens if you invoke plainmake
in the top level source directory after making your code changes? If that rebuilds what you need, trydebuild -nc
after that.
– Ferenc Wágner
Aug 24 '16 at 8:16
make
does do something; it compiles bits in[top-level-source]/modules/mappers/.libs/
but the .so file in there is larger than the .so file that is installed (9.4K vs 35K). However, the file that a fulldebuild
builds ends up in[top-level-source]/debian/apache2-bin/usr/lib/apache2/modules/
. So my doing amake
followed bydebuild -nc
didn't result in a file I could install.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 25 '16 at 22:13
I'm might be saying what you already know, but it seems to me that there's the Apache distribution, along with all it's make files, and then there's the Debian patches and its makes files... and the two are separate? And I'm also wondering if the Debian stuff doesn't just recompile everything because easier/safer to do so! Maybe?!
– Peter Ryan
Aug 25 '16 at 22:16
The size difference is probably the result of stripping. Anyway, this in encouraging. Now, runsed -i '/^dh_auto_build$/Q' debian/apache2-bin.debhelper.log
(supposing your changes concern theapache2-bin
binary package). Then rundebuild -nc
.
– Ferenc Wágner
Aug 26 '16 at 7:17
Thank you too for your reply! It didn't work though! :D In fact, the output, and the duration taken were identical to removing the clean bits from debian/rules. I've updated the question with the output from debuild with -nc in case it helps.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 23:00
Thank you too for your reply! It didn't work though! :D In fact, the output, and the duration taken were identical to removing the clean bits from debian/rules. I've updated the question with the output from debuild with -nc in case it helps.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 23:00
What happens if you invoke plain
make
in the top level source directory after making your code changes? If that rebuilds what you need, try debuild -nc
after that.– Ferenc Wágner
Aug 24 '16 at 8:16
What happens if you invoke plain
make
in the top level source directory after making your code changes? If that rebuilds what you need, try debuild -nc
after that.– Ferenc Wágner
Aug 24 '16 at 8:16
make
does do something; it compiles bits in [top-level-source]/modules/mappers/.libs/
but the .so file in there is larger than the .so file that is installed (9.4K vs 35K). However, the file that a full debuild
builds ends up in [top-level-source]/debian/apache2-bin/usr/lib/apache2/modules/
. So my doing a make
followed by debuild -nc
didn't result in a file I could install.– Peter Ryan
Aug 25 '16 at 22:13
make
does do something; it compiles bits in [top-level-source]/modules/mappers/.libs/
but the .so file in there is larger than the .so file that is installed (9.4K vs 35K). However, the file that a full debuild
builds ends up in [top-level-source]/debian/apache2-bin/usr/lib/apache2/modules/
. So my doing a make
followed by debuild -nc
didn't result in a file I could install.– Peter Ryan
Aug 25 '16 at 22:13
I'm might be saying what you already know, but it seems to me that there's the Apache distribution, along with all it's make files, and then there's the Debian patches and its makes files... and the two are separate? And I'm also wondering if the Debian stuff doesn't just recompile everything because easier/safer to do so! Maybe?!
– Peter Ryan
Aug 25 '16 at 22:16
I'm might be saying what you already know, but it seems to me that there's the Apache distribution, along with all it's make files, and then there's the Debian patches and its makes files... and the two are separate? And I'm also wondering if the Debian stuff doesn't just recompile everything because easier/safer to do so! Maybe?!
– Peter Ryan
Aug 25 '16 at 22:16
The size difference is probably the result of stripping. Anyway, this in encouraging. Now, run
sed -i '/^dh_auto_build$/Q' debian/apache2-bin.debhelper.log
(supposing your changes concern the apache2-bin
binary package). Then run debuild -nc
.– Ferenc Wágner
Aug 26 '16 at 7:17
The size difference is probably the result of stripping. Anyway, this in encouraging. Now, run
sed -i '/^dh_auto_build$/Q' debian/apache2-bin.debhelper.log
(supposing your changes concern the apache2-bin
binary package). Then run debuild -nc
.– Ferenc Wágner
Aug 26 '16 at 7:17
|
show 1 more comment
Inside the debian directory there's a rules file. It's a essentially a make file. If you remove all the directives about cleaning and then add
override_dh_clean:
And put nothing in it no cleaning will happen (at all). Be careful though this might cause build problems, not likely but might. Another alternative is to not change anything and use the -j option to do a parallel build. Not sure the advantage that'd give on a raspberry pi.
Rules file should look like this:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-apache/apache2.git/tree/debian/rules
Thanks for your reply! I've tried editing debian/rules, but whilst it is much quicker (less than 7 minutes), it doesn't re-compile the module I've edited.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 17:22
Having had a look around, there's a lot of .mk files in there too, but I'm utterly lost as to what calls what and when!
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 17:25
add a comment |
Inside the debian directory there's a rules file. It's a essentially a make file. If you remove all the directives about cleaning and then add
override_dh_clean:
And put nothing in it no cleaning will happen (at all). Be careful though this might cause build problems, not likely but might. Another alternative is to not change anything and use the -j option to do a parallel build. Not sure the advantage that'd give on a raspberry pi.
Rules file should look like this:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-apache/apache2.git/tree/debian/rules
Thanks for your reply! I've tried editing debian/rules, but whilst it is much quicker (less than 7 minutes), it doesn't re-compile the module I've edited.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 17:22
Having had a look around, there's a lot of .mk files in there too, but I'm utterly lost as to what calls what and when!
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 17:25
add a comment |
Inside the debian directory there's a rules file. It's a essentially a make file. If you remove all the directives about cleaning and then add
override_dh_clean:
And put nothing in it no cleaning will happen (at all). Be careful though this might cause build problems, not likely but might. Another alternative is to not change anything and use the -j option to do a parallel build. Not sure the advantage that'd give on a raspberry pi.
Rules file should look like this:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-apache/apache2.git/tree/debian/rules
Inside the debian directory there's a rules file. It's a essentially a make file. If you remove all the directives about cleaning and then add
override_dh_clean:
And put nothing in it no cleaning will happen (at all). Be careful though this might cause build problems, not likely but might. Another alternative is to not change anything and use the -j option to do a parallel build. Not sure the advantage that'd give on a raspberry pi.
Rules file should look like this:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-apache/apache2.git/tree/debian/rules
answered Aug 20 '16 at 18:58
Livinglifeback
1,104713
1,104713
Thanks for your reply! I've tried editing debian/rules, but whilst it is much quicker (less than 7 minutes), it doesn't re-compile the module I've edited.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 17:22
Having had a look around, there's a lot of .mk files in there too, but I'm utterly lost as to what calls what and when!
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 17:25
add a comment |
Thanks for your reply! I've tried editing debian/rules, but whilst it is much quicker (less than 7 minutes), it doesn't re-compile the module I've edited.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 17:22
Having had a look around, there's a lot of .mk files in there too, but I'm utterly lost as to what calls what and when!
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 17:25
Thanks for your reply! I've tried editing debian/rules, but whilst it is much quicker (less than 7 minutes), it doesn't re-compile the module I've edited.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 17:22
Thanks for your reply! I've tried editing debian/rules, but whilst it is much quicker (less than 7 minutes), it doesn't re-compile the module I've edited.
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 17:22
Having had a look around, there's a lot of .mk files in there too, but I'm utterly lost as to what calls what and when!
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 17:25
Having had a look around, there's a lot of .mk files in there too, but I'm utterly lost as to what calls what and when!
– Peter Ryan
Aug 21 '16 at 17:25
add a comment |
I had a similar problem; Scite debian package has in debian/rules
:
...
BUILD_DATE="$(date --utc --date="@${SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH:-$(date +%s)}" "+%b %d %Y %T")"
override CPPFLAGS += -DBUILD_DATE=""$(BUILD_DATE)""
%:
dh $@
override_dh_auto_build:
dh_auto_build --sourcedirectory=scintilla/gtk -- GTK3=1 $(BUILD_LUA)
dh_auto_build --sourcedirectory=scite/gtk -- gnomeprefix=/usr GTK3=1 $(BUILD_LUA)
....
Essentially, override_dh_auto_build
calls the make, which detects changed source files and rebuilds only changed ones. However, even if debian/rules
sets BUILD_DATE
, running:
fakeroot debian/rules -j$(nproc) override_dh_auto_build
... will fail at some cpp source files that use BUILD_DATE as a define. The solution is to explicitly specify this variable on the command line call:
fakeroot debian/rules -j$(nproc) CPPFLAGS+=-DBUILD_DATE="" override_dh_auto_build
... and then compilation passes (additional bonus is that a new .deb is not created, so you don't have to wait for that). Essentially, this helps to rerun just the rebuild process for changed files that gives you the .so/.exe, without packaging a .deb.
add a comment |
I had a similar problem; Scite debian package has in debian/rules
:
...
BUILD_DATE="$(date --utc --date="@${SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH:-$(date +%s)}" "+%b %d %Y %T")"
override CPPFLAGS += -DBUILD_DATE=""$(BUILD_DATE)""
%:
dh $@
override_dh_auto_build:
dh_auto_build --sourcedirectory=scintilla/gtk -- GTK3=1 $(BUILD_LUA)
dh_auto_build --sourcedirectory=scite/gtk -- gnomeprefix=/usr GTK3=1 $(BUILD_LUA)
....
Essentially, override_dh_auto_build
calls the make, which detects changed source files and rebuilds only changed ones. However, even if debian/rules
sets BUILD_DATE
, running:
fakeroot debian/rules -j$(nproc) override_dh_auto_build
... will fail at some cpp source files that use BUILD_DATE as a define. The solution is to explicitly specify this variable on the command line call:
fakeroot debian/rules -j$(nproc) CPPFLAGS+=-DBUILD_DATE="" override_dh_auto_build
... and then compilation passes (additional bonus is that a new .deb is not created, so you don't have to wait for that). Essentially, this helps to rerun just the rebuild process for changed files that gives you the .so/.exe, without packaging a .deb.
add a comment |
I had a similar problem; Scite debian package has in debian/rules
:
...
BUILD_DATE="$(date --utc --date="@${SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH:-$(date +%s)}" "+%b %d %Y %T")"
override CPPFLAGS += -DBUILD_DATE=""$(BUILD_DATE)""
%:
dh $@
override_dh_auto_build:
dh_auto_build --sourcedirectory=scintilla/gtk -- GTK3=1 $(BUILD_LUA)
dh_auto_build --sourcedirectory=scite/gtk -- gnomeprefix=/usr GTK3=1 $(BUILD_LUA)
....
Essentially, override_dh_auto_build
calls the make, which detects changed source files and rebuilds only changed ones. However, even if debian/rules
sets BUILD_DATE
, running:
fakeroot debian/rules -j$(nproc) override_dh_auto_build
... will fail at some cpp source files that use BUILD_DATE as a define. The solution is to explicitly specify this variable on the command line call:
fakeroot debian/rules -j$(nproc) CPPFLAGS+=-DBUILD_DATE="" override_dh_auto_build
... and then compilation passes (additional bonus is that a new .deb is not created, so you don't have to wait for that). Essentially, this helps to rerun just the rebuild process for changed files that gives you the .so/.exe, without packaging a .deb.
I had a similar problem; Scite debian package has in debian/rules
:
...
BUILD_DATE="$(date --utc --date="@${SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH:-$(date +%s)}" "+%b %d %Y %T")"
override CPPFLAGS += -DBUILD_DATE=""$(BUILD_DATE)""
%:
dh $@
override_dh_auto_build:
dh_auto_build --sourcedirectory=scintilla/gtk -- GTK3=1 $(BUILD_LUA)
dh_auto_build --sourcedirectory=scite/gtk -- gnomeprefix=/usr GTK3=1 $(BUILD_LUA)
....
Essentially, override_dh_auto_build
calls the make, which detects changed source files and rebuilds only changed ones. However, even if debian/rules
sets BUILD_DATE
, running:
fakeroot debian/rules -j$(nproc) override_dh_auto_build
... will fail at some cpp source files that use BUILD_DATE as a define. The solution is to explicitly specify this variable on the command line call:
fakeroot debian/rules -j$(nproc) CPPFLAGS+=-DBUILD_DATE="" override_dh_auto_build
... and then compilation passes (additional bonus is that a new .deb is not created, so you don't have to wait for that). Essentially, this helps to rerun just the rebuild process for changed files that gives you the .so/.exe, without packaging a .deb.
answered 19 mins ago
sdaau
2,62763148
2,62763148
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f304590%2fhow-to-debuild-debian-apache-without-it-performing-a-clean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown