Quaternion square root
up vote
12
down vote
favorite
Background
Quaternion is a number system that extends complex numbers. A quaternion has the following form
$$ a + bi + cj + dk $$
where $ a,b,c,d $ are real numbers and $ i,j,k $ are three fundamental quaternion units. The units have the following properties:
$$ i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = -1 $$
$$ ij = k, jk = i, ki = j $$
$$ ji = -k, kj = -i, ik = -j $$
Note that quaternion multiplication is not commutative.
Task
Given a non-real quaternion, compute at least one of its square roots.
How?
According to this Math.SE answer, we can express any non-real quaternion in the following form:
$$ q = a + bvec{u} $$
where $ a,b$ are real numbers and $ vec{u} $ is the imaginary unit vector in the form $ xi + yj + zk $ with $ x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1 $. Any such $ vec{u} $ has the property $ vec{u}^2 = -1 $, so it can be viewed as the imaginary unit.
Then the square of $ q $ looks like this:
$$ q^2 = (a^2 - b^2) + 2abvec{u} $$
Inversely, given a quaternion $ q' = x + yvec{u} $, we can find the square root of $ q' $ by solving the following equations
$$ x = a^2 - b^2, y = 2ab $$
which is identical to the process of finding the square root of a complex number.
Note that a negative real number has infinitely many quaternion square roots, but a non-real quaternion has only two square roots.
Input and output
Input is a non-real quaternion. You can take it as four real (floating-point) numbers, in any order and structure of your choice. Non-real means that at least one of $ b,c,d $ is non-zero.
Output is one or two quaternions which, when squared, are equal to the input.
Test cases
Input (a, b, c, d) => Output (a, b, c, d) rounded to 6 digits
0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0 => 0.707107, 0.707107, 0.000000, 0.000000
1.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0 => 1.098684, 0.455090, 0.000000, 0.000000
1.0, -1.0, 1.0, 0.0 => 1.168771, -0.427800, 0.427800, 0.000000
2.0, 0.0, -2.0, -1.0 => 1.581139, 0.000000, -0.632456, -0.316228
1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0 => 1.224745, 0.408248, 0.408248, 0.408248
0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 => 0.569088, 0.175720, 0.263580, 0.351439
99.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.1 => 9.949876, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.005025
Generated using this Python script. Only one of the two correct answers is specified for each test case; the other is all four values negated.
Scoring & winning criterion
Standard code-golf rules apply. The shortest program or function in bytes in each language wins.
code-golf math complex-numbers
add a comment |
up vote
12
down vote
favorite
Background
Quaternion is a number system that extends complex numbers. A quaternion has the following form
$$ a + bi + cj + dk $$
where $ a,b,c,d $ are real numbers and $ i,j,k $ are three fundamental quaternion units. The units have the following properties:
$$ i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = -1 $$
$$ ij = k, jk = i, ki = j $$
$$ ji = -k, kj = -i, ik = -j $$
Note that quaternion multiplication is not commutative.
Task
Given a non-real quaternion, compute at least one of its square roots.
How?
According to this Math.SE answer, we can express any non-real quaternion in the following form:
$$ q = a + bvec{u} $$
where $ a,b$ are real numbers and $ vec{u} $ is the imaginary unit vector in the form $ xi + yj + zk $ with $ x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1 $. Any such $ vec{u} $ has the property $ vec{u}^2 = -1 $, so it can be viewed as the imaginary unit.
Then the square of $ q $ looks like this:
$$ q^2 = (a^2 - b^2) + 2abvec{u} $$
Inversely, given a quaternion $ q' = x + yvec{u} $, we can find the square root of $ q' $ by solving the following equations
$$ x = a^2 - b^2, y = 2ab $$
which is identical to the process of finding the square root of a complex number.
Note that a negative real number has infinitely many quaternion square roots, but a non-real quaternion has only two square roots.
Input and output
Input is a non-real quaternion. You can take it as four real (floating-point) numbers, in any order and structure of your choice. Non-real means that at least one of $ b,c,d $ is non-zero.
Output is one or two quaternions which, when squared, are equal to the input.
Test cases
Input (a, b, c, d) => Output (a, b, c, d) rounded to 6 digits
0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0 => 0.707107, 0.707107, 0.000000, 0.000000
1.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0 => 1.098684, 0.455090, 0.000000, 0.000000
1.0, -1.0, 1.0, 0.0 => 1.168771, -0.427800, 0.427800, 0.000000
2.0, 0.0, -2.0, -1.0 => 1.581139, 0.000000, -0.632456, -0.316228
1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0 => 1.224745, 0.408248, 0.408248, 0.408248
0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 => 0.569088, 0.175720, 0.263580, 0.351439
99.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.1 => 9.949876, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.005025
Generated using this Python script. Only one of the two correct answers is specified for each test case; the other is all four values negated.
Scoring & winning criterion
Standard code-golf rules apply. The shortest program or function in bytes in each language wins.
code-golf math complex-numbers
Can we take the quaternion asa, (b, c, d)
?
– nwellnhof
yesterday
@nwellnhof Sure. Even something likea,[b,[c,[d]]]
is fine, if you can somehow save bytes with it :)
– Bubbler
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
12
down vote
favorite
up vote
12
down vote
favorite
Background
Quaternion is a number system that extends complex numbers. A quaternion has the following form
$$ a + bi + cj + dk $$
where $ a,b,c,d $ are real numbers and $ i,j,k $ are three fundamental quaternion units. The units have the following properties:
$$ i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = -1 $$
$$ ij = k, jk = i, ki = j $$
$$ ji = -k, kj = -i, ik = -j $$
Note that quaternion multiplication is not commutative.
Task
Given a non-real quaternion, compute at least one of its square roots.
How?
According to this Math.SE answer, we can express any non-real quaternion in the following form:
$$ q = a + bvec{u} $$
where $ a,b$ are real numbers and $ vec{u} $ is the imaginary unit vector in the form $ xi + yj + zk $ with $ x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1 $. Any such $ vec{u} $ has the property $ vec{u}^2 = -1 $, so it can be viewed as the imaginary unit.
Then the square of $ q $ looks like this:
$$ q^2 = (a^2 - b^2) + 2abvec{u} $$
Inversely, given a quaternion $ q' = x + yvec{u} $, we can find the square root of $ q' $ by solving the following equations
$$ x = a^2 - b^2, y = 2ab $$
which is identical to the process of finding the square root of a complex number.
Note that a negative real number has infinitely many quaternion square roots, but a non-real quaternion has only two square roots.
Input and output
Input is a non-real quaternion. You can take it as four real (floating-point) numbers, in any order and structure of your choice. Non-real means that at least one of $ b,c,d $ is non-zero.
Output is one or two quaternions which, when squared, are equal to the input.
Test cases
Input (a, b, c, d) => Output (a, b, c, d) rounded to 6 digits
0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0 => 0.707107, 0.707107, 0.000000, 0.000000
1.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0 => 1.098684, 0.455090, 0.000000, 0.000000
1.0, -1.0, 1.0, 0.0 => 1.168771, -0.427800, 0.427800, 0.000000
2.0, 0.0, -2.0, -1.0 => 1.581139, 0.000000, -0.632456, -0.316228
1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0 => 1.224745, 0.408248, 0.408248, 0.408248
0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 => 0.569088, 0.175720, 0.263580, 0.351439
99.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.1 => 9.949876, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.005025
Generated using this Python script. Only one of the two correct answers is specified for each test case; the other is all four values negated.
Scoring & winning criterion
Standard code-golf rules apply. The shortest program or function in bytes in each language wins.
code-golf math complex-numbers
Background
Quaternion is a number system that extends complex numbers. A quaternion has the following form
$$ a + bi + cj + dk $$
where $ a,b,c,d $ are real numbers and $ i,j,k $ are three fundamental quaternion units. The units have the following properties:
$$ i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = -1 $$
$$ ij = k, jk = i, ki = j $$
$$ ji = -k, kj = -i, ik = -j $$
Note that quaternion multiplication is not commutative.
Task
Given a non-real quaternion, compute at least one of its square roots.
How?
According to this Math.SE answer, we can express any non-real quaternion in the following form:
$$ q = a + bvec{u} $$
where $ a,b$ are real numbers and $ vec{u} $ is the imaginary unit vector in the form $ xi + yj + zk $ with $ x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1 $. Any such $ vec{u} $ has the property $ vec{u}^2 = -1 $, so it can be viewed as the imaginary unit.
Then the square of $ q $ looks like this:
$$ q^2 = (a^2 - b^2) + 2abvec{u} $$
Inversely, given a quaternion $ q' = x + yvec{u} $, we can find the square root of $ q' $ by solving the following equations
$$ x = a^2 - b^2, y = 2ab $$
which is identical to the process of finding the square root of a complex number.
Note that a negative real number has infinitely many quaternion square roots, but a non-real quaternion has only two square roots.
Input and output
Input is a non-real quaternion. You can take it as four real (floating-point) numbers, in any order and structure of your choice. Non-real means that at least one of $ b,c,d $ is non-zero.
Output is one or two quaternions which, when squared, are equal to the input.
Test cases
Input (a, b, c, d) => Output (a, b, c, d) rounded to 6 digits
0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0 => 0.707107, 0.707107, 0.000000, 0.000000
1.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0 => 1.098684, 0.455090, 0.000000, 0.000000
1.0, -1.0, 1.0, 0.0 => 1.168771, -0.427800, 0.427800, 0.000000
2.0, 0.0, -2.0, -1.0 => 1.581139, 0.000000, -0.632456, -0.316228
1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0 => 1.224745, 0.408248, 0.408248, 0.408248
0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 => 0.569088, 0.175720, 0.263580, 0.351439
99.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.1 => 9.949876, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.005025
Generated using this Python script. Only one of the two correct answers is specified for each test case; the other is all four values negated.
Scoring & winning criterion
Standard code-golf rules apply. The shortest program or function in bytes in each language wins.
code-golf math complex-numbers
code-golf math complex-numbers
edited yesterday
asked 2 days ago
Bubbler
5,499754
5,499754
Can we take the quaternion asa, (b, c, d)
?
– nwellnhof
yesterday
@nwellnhof Sure. Even something likea,[b,[c,[d]]]
is fine, if you can somehow save bytes with it :)
– Bubbler
yesterday
add a comment |
Can we take the quaternion asa, (b, c, d)
?
– nwellnhof
yesterday
@nwellnhof Sure. Even something likea,[b,[c,[d]]]
is fine, if you can somehow save bytes with it :)
– Bubbler
yesterday
Can we take the quaternion as
a, (b, c, d)
?– nwellnhof
yesterday
Can we take the quaternion as
a, (b, c, d)
?– nwellnhof
yesterday
@nwellnhof Sure. Even something like
a,[b,[c,[d]]]
is fine, if you can somehow save bytes with it :)– Bubbler
yesterday
@nwellnhof Sure. Even something like
a,[b,[c,[d]]]
is fine, if you can somehow save bytes with it :)– Bubbler
yesterday
add a comment |
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
up vote
28
down vote
APL (NARS), 2 bytes
√
NARS has built-in support for quaternions. ¯_(⍨)_/¯
4
I can't help it: you should include " ¯_(ツ)_/¯ " In your answer
– Barranka
2 days ago
6
You dropped this
– Andrew
yesterday
@Barranka Done.
– Adám
yesterday
@Andrew blame it on the Android app... Thank you for picking it up :)
– Barranka
yesterday
1
It'd be better if it's¯_(⍨)√¯
– Zacharý
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
Python 2, 72 bytes
def f(a,b,c,d):s=((a+(a*a+b*b+c*c+d*d)**.5)*2)**.5;print s/2,b/s,c/s,d/s
Try it online!
More or less a raw formula. I thought I could use list comprehensions to loop over b,c,d
, but this seems to be longer. Python is really hurt here by a lack of vector operations, in particular scaling and norm.
Python 3, 77 bytes
def f(a,*l):r=a+sum(x*x for x in[a,*l])**.5;return[x/(r*2)**.5for x in[r,*l]]
Try it online!
Solving the quadratic directly was also shorter than using Python's complex-number square root to solve it like in the problem statement.
"Input is a non-real quaternion. You can take it as four real (floating-point) numbers, in any order and structure of your choice." So you can consider it to be a pandas series or numpy array. Series have scaling with simple multiplication, and there are various ways to get norm, such as(s*s).sum()**.5
.
– Acccumulation
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 19 bytes
Sqrt
<<Quaternions`
Try it online!
Mathematica has Quaternion built-in too, but is more verbose.
Although built-ins look cool, do upvote solutions that don't use built-ins too! I don't want votes on questions reaching HNQ be skewed.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
JavaScript (ES7), 55 53 bytes
Based on the direct formula used by xnor.
Takes input as an array.
q=>q.map(v=>1/q?v/2/q:q=((v+Math.hypot(...q))/2)**.5)
Try it online!
How?
Given an array $q=[a,b,c,d]$, this computes:
$$x=sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2}}{2}}$$
And returns:
$$left[x,frac{b}{2x},frac{c}{2x},frac{d}{2x}right]$$
q => // q = input array
q.map(v => // for each value v in q:
1 / q ? // if q is numeric (2nd to 4th iteration):
v / 2 / q // yield v / 2q
: // else (1st iteration, with v = a):
q = ( // compute x (as defined above) and store it in q
(v + Math.hypot(...q)) // we use Math.hypot(...q) to compute:
/ 2 // (q[0]**2 + q[1]**2 + q[2]**2 + q[3]**2) ** 0.5
) ** .5 // yield x
) // end of map()
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Haskell, 51 bytes
f(a:l)|r<-a+sqrt(sum$(^2)<$>a:l)=(/sqrt(r*2))<$>r:l
Try it online!
A direct formula. The main trick to express the real part of the output as r/sqrt(r*2)
to parallel the imaginary part expression, which saves a few bytes over:
54 bytes
f(a:l)|s<-sqrt$2*(a+sqrt(sum$(^2)<$>a:l))=s/2:map(/s)l
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Java 8, 84 bytes
(a,b,c,d)->(a=Math.sqrt(2*(a+Math.sqrt(a*a+b*b+c*c+d*d))))/2+" "+b/a+" "+c/a+" "+d/a
Port of @xnor's Python 2 answer.
Try it online.
Explanation:
(a,b,c,d)-> // Method with four double parameters and String return-type
(a= // Change `a` to:
Math.sqrt( // The square root of:
2* // Two times:
(a+ // `a` plus,
Math.sqrt( // the square-root of:
a*a // `a` squared,
+b*b // `b` squared,
+c*c // `c` squared,
+d*d)))) // And `d` squared summed together
/2 // Then return this modified `a` divided by 2
+" "+b/a // `b` divided by the modified `a`
+" "+c/a // `c` divided by the modified `a`
+" "+d/a // And `d` divided by the modified `a`, with space delimiters
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Charcoal, 32 bytes
≔X⊗⁺§θ⁰XΣEθ×ιι·⁵¦·⁵η≧∕ηθ§≔θ⁰⊘ηIθ
Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Port of @xnor's Python answer. Explanation:
≔X⊗⁺§θ⁰XΣEθ×ιι·⁵¦·⁵η
Square all of the elements of the input and take the sum, then take the square root. This calculates $ | x + yvec{u} | = sqrt{ x^2 + y^2 } = sqrt{ (a^2 - b^2)^2 + (2ab)^2 } = a^2 + b^2 $. Adding $ x $ gives $ 2a^2 $ which is then doubled and square rooted to give $ 2a $.
≧∕ηθ
Because $ y = 2ab $, calculate $ b $ by dividing by $ 2a $.
§≔θ⁰⊘η
Set the first element of the array (i.e. the real part) to half of $ 2a $.
Iθ
Cast the values to string and implicitly print.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
05AB1E, 14 bytes
nOtsн+·t©/¦®;š
Port of @xnor's Python 2 answer.
Try it online or verify all test cases.
Explanation:
n # Square each number in the (implicit) input-list
O # Sum them
t # Take the square-root of that
sн+ # Add the first item of the input-list
· # Double it
t # Take the square-root of it
© # Store it in the register (without popping)
/ # Divide each value in the (implicit) input with it
¦ # Remove the first item
®; # Push the value from the register again, and halve it
š # Prepend it to the list (and output implicitly)
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 28 bytes
{s=#+Norm@{##},##2}/(2s)^.5&
Port of @xnor's Python 2 answer.
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
C# .NET, 88 bytes
(a,b,c,d)=>((a=System.Math.Sqrt(2*(a+System.Math.Sqrt(a*a+b*b+c*c+d*d))))/2,b/a,c/a,d/a)
Port of my Java 8 answer, but returns a Tuple instead of a String. I thought that would have been shorter, but unfortunately the Math.Sqrt
require a System
-import in C# .NET, ending up at 4 bytes longer instead of 10 bytes shorter.. >.>
The lambda declaration looks pretty funny, though:
System.Func<double, double, double, double, (double, double, double, double)> f =
Try it online.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Perl 6, 49 bytes
{;(*+@^b>>².sum**.5*i).sqrt.&{.re,(@b X/2*.re)}}
Try it online!
Curried function taking input as f(b,c,d)(a)
. Returns quaternion as a,(b,c,d)
.
Explanation
{; } # Block returning WhateverCode
@^b>>².sum**.5 # Compute B of quaternion written as q = a + B*u
# (length of vector (b,c,d))
(*+ *i) # Complex number a + B*i
.sqrt # Square root of complex number
.&{ } # Return
.re, # Real part of square root
(@b X/2*.re) # b,c,d divided by 2* real part
add a comment |
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
28
down vote
APL (NARS), 2 bytes
√
NARS has built-in support for quaternions. ¯_(⍨)_/¯
4
I can't help it: you should include " ¯_(ツ)_/¯ " In your answer
– Barranka
2 days ago
6
You dropped this
– Andrew
yesterday
@Barranka Done.
– Adám
yesterday
@Andrew blame it on the Android app... Thank you for picking it up :)
– Barranka
yesterday
1
It'd be better if it's¯_(⍨)√¯
– Zacharý
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
28
down vote
APL (NARS), 2 bytes
√
NARS has built-in support for quaternions. ¯_(⍨)_/¯
4
I can't help it: you should include " ¯_(ツ)_/¯ " In your answer
– Barranka
2 days ago
6
You dropped this
– Andrew
yesterday
@Barranka Done.
– Adám
yesterday
@Andrew blame it on the Android app... Thank you for picking it up :)
– Barranka
yesterday
1
It'd be better if it's¯_(⍨)√¯
– Zacharý
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
28
down vote
up vote
28
down vote
APL (NARS), 2 bytes
√
NARS has built-in support for quaternions. ¯_(⍨)_/¯
APL (NARS), 2 bytes
√
NARS has built-in support for quaternions. ¯_(⍨)_/¯
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
Adám
28.2k269186
28.2k269186
4
I can't help it: you should include " ¯_(ツ)_/¯ " In your answer
– Barranka
2 days ago
6
You dropped this
– Andrew
yesterday
@Barranka Done.
– Adám
yesterday
@Andrew blame it on the Android app... Thank you for picking it up :)
– Barranka
yesterday
1
It'd be better if it's¯_(⍨)√¯
– Zacharý
yesterday
add a comment |
4
I can't help it: you should include " ¯_(ツ)_/¯ " In your answer
– Barranka
2 days ago
6
You dropped this
– Andrew
yesterday
@Barranka Done.
– Adám
yesterday
@Andrew blame it on the Android app... Thank you for picking it up :)
– Barranka
yesterday
1
It'd be better if it's¯_(⍨)√¯
– Zacharý
yesterday
4
4
I can't help it: you should include " ¯_(ツ)_/¯ " In your answer
– Barranka
2 days ago
I can't help it: you should include " ¯_(ツ)_/¯ " In your answer
– Barranka
2 days ago
6
6
You dropped this
– Andrew
yesterday
You dropped this
– Andrew
yesterday
@Barranka Done.
– Adám
yesterday
@Barranka Done.
– Adám
yesterday
@Andrew blame it on the Android app... Thank you for picking it up :)
– Barranka
yesterday
@Andrew blame it on the Android app... Thank you for picking it up :)
– Barranka
yesterday
1
1
It'd be better if it's
¯_(⍨)√¯
– Zacharý
yesterday
It'd be better if it's
¯_(⍨)√¯
– Zacharý
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
Python 2, 72 bytes
def f(a,b,c,d):s=((a+(a*a+b*b+c*c+d*d)**.5)*2)**.5;print s/2,b/s,c/s,d/s
Try it online!
More or less a raw formula. I thought I could use list comprehensions to loop over b,c,d
, but this seems to be longer. Python is really hurt here by a lack of vector operations, in particular scaling and norm.
Python 3, 77 bytes
def f(a,*l):r=a+sum(x*x for x in[a,*l])**.5;return[x/(r*2)**.5for x in[r,*l]]
Try it online!
Solving the quadratic directly was also shorter than using Python's complex-number square root to solve it like in the problem statement.
"Input is a non-real quaternion. You can take it as four real (floating-point) numbers, in any order and structure of your choice." So you can consider it to be a pandas series or numpy array. Series have scaling with simple multiplication, and there are various ways to get norm, such as(s*s).sum()**.5
.
– Acccumulation
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
Python 2, 72 bytes
def f(a,b,c,d):s=((a+(a*a+b*b+c*c+d*d)**.5)*2)**.5;print s/2,b/s,c/s,d/s
Try it online!
More or less a raw formula. I thought I could use list comprehensions to loop over b,c,d
, but this seems to be longer. Python is really hurt here by a lack of vector operations, in particular scaling and norm.
Python 3, 77 bytes
def f(a,*l):r=a+sum(x*x for x in[a,*l])**.5;return[x/(r*2)**.5for x in[r,*l]]
Try it online!
Solving the quadratic directly was also shorter than using Python's complex-number square root to solve it like in the problem statement.
"Input is a non-real quaternion. You can take it as four real (floating-point) numbers, in any order and structure of your choice." So you can consider it to be a pandas series or numpy array. Series have scaling with simple multiplication, and there are various ways to get norm, such as(s*s).sum()**.5
.
– Acccumulation
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
Python 2, 72 bytes
def f(a,b,c,d):s=((a+(a*a+b*b+c*c+d*d)**.5)*2)**.5;print s/2,b/s,c/s,d/s
Try it online!
More or less a raw formula. I thought I could use list comprehensions to loop over b,c,d
, but this seems to be longer. Python is really hurt here by a lack of vector operations, in particular scaling and norm.
Python 3, 77 bytes
def f(a,*l):r=a+sum(x*x for x in[a,*l])**.5;return[x/(r*2)**.5for x in[r,*l]]
Try it online!
Solving the quadratic directly was also shorter than using Python's complex-number square root to solve it like in the problem statement.
Python 2, 72 bytes
def f(a,b,c,d):s=((a+(a*a+b*b+c*c+d*d)**.5)*2)**.5;print s/2,b/s,c/s,d/s
Try it online!
More or less a raw formula. I thought I could use list comprehensions to loop over b,c,d
, but this seems to be longer. Python is really hurt here by a lack of vector operations, in particular scaling and norm.
Python 3, 77 bytes
def f(a,*l):r=a+sum(x*x for x in[a,*l])**.5;return[x/(r*2)**.5for x in[r,*l]]
Try it online!
Solving the quadratic directly was also shorter than using Python's complex-number square root to solve it like in the problem statement.
answered 2 days ago
xnor
88.7k18183436
88.7k18183436
"Input is a non-real quaternion. You can take it as four real (floating-point) numbers, in any order and structure of your choice." So you can consider it to be a pandas series or numpy array. Series have scaling with simple multiplication, and there are various ways to get norm, such as(s*s).sum()**.5
.
– Acccumulation
yesterday
add a comment |
"Input is a non-real quaternion. You can take it as four real (floating-point) numbers, in any order and structure of your choice." So you can consider it to be a pandas series or numpy array. Series have scaling with simple multiplication, and there are various ways to get norm, such as(s*s).sum()**.5
.
– Acccumulation
yesterday
"Input is a non-real quaternion. You can take it as four real (floating-point) numbers, in any order and structure of your choice." So you can consider it to be a pandas series or numpy array. Series have scaling with simple multiplication, and there are various ways to get norm, such as
(s*s).sum()**.5
.– Acccumulation
yesterday
"Input is a non-real quaternion. You can take it as four real (floating-point) numbers, in any order and structure of your choice." So you can consider it to be a pandas series or numpy array. Series have scaling with simple multiplication, and there are various ways to get norm, such as
(s*s).sum()**.5
.– Acccumulation
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 19 bytes
Sqrt
<<Quaternions`
Try it online!
Mathematica has Quaternion built-in too, but is more verbose.
Although built-ins look cool, do upvote solutions that don't use built-ins too! I don't want votes on questions reaching HNQ be skewed.
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 19 bytes
Sqrt
<<Quaternions`
Try it online!
Mathematica has Quaternion built-in too, but is more verbose.
Although built-ins look cool, do upvote solutions that don't use built-ins too! I don't want votes on questions reaching HNQ be skewed.
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 19 bytes
Sqrt
<<Quaternions`
Try it online!
Mathematica has Quaternion built-in too, but is more verbose.
Although built-ins look cool, do upvote solutions that don't use built-ins too! I don't want votes on questions reaching HNQ be skewed.
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 19 bytes
Sqrt
<<Quaternions`
Try it online!
Mathematica has Quaternion built-in too, but is more verbose.
Although built-ins look cool, do upvote solutions that don't use built-ins too! I don't want votes on questions reaching HNQ be skewed.
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
user202729
13.4k12549
13.4k12549
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
JavaScript (ES7), 55 53 bytes
Based on the direct formula used by xnor.
Takes input as an array.
q=>q.map(v=>1/q?v/2/q:q=((v+Math.hypot(...q))/2)**.5)
Try it online!
How?
Given an array $q=[a,b,c,d]$, this computes:
$$x=sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2}}{2}}$$
And returns:
$$left[x,frac{b}{2x},frac{c}{2x},frac{d}{2x}right]$$
q => // q = input array
q.map(v => // for each value v in q:
1 / q ? // if q is numeric (2nd to 4th iteration):
v / 2 / q // yield v / 2q
: // else (1st iteration, with v = a):
q = ( // compute x (as defined above) and store it in q
(v + Math.hypot(...q)) // we use Math.hypot(...q) to compute:
/ 2 // (q[0]**2 + q[1]**2 + q[2]**2 + q[3]**2) ** 0.5
) ** .5 // yield x
) // end of map()
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
JavaScript (ES7), 55 53 bytes
Based on the direct formula used by xnor.
Takes input as an array.
q=>q.map(v=>1/q?v/2/q:q=((v+Math.hypot(...q))/2)**.5)
Try it online!
How?
Given an array $q=[a,b,c,d]$, this computes:
$$x=sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2}}{2}}$$
And returns:
$$left[x,frac{b}{2x},frac{c}{2x},frac{d}{2x}right]$$
q => // q = input array
q.map(v => // for each value v in q:
1 / q ? // if q is numeric (2nd to 4th iteration):
v / 2 / q // yield v / 2q
: // else (1st iteration, with v = a):
q = ( // compute x (as defined above) and store it in q
(v + Math.hypot(...q)) // we use Math.hypot(...q) to compute:
/ 2 // (q[0]**2 + q[1]**2 + q[2]**2 + q[3]**2) ** 0.5
) ** .5 // yield x
) // end of map()
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
JavaScript (ES7), 55 53 bytes
Based on the direct formula used by xnor.
Takes input as an array.
q=>q.map(v=>1/q?v/2/q:q=((v+Math.hypot(...q))/2)**.5)
Try it online!
How?
Given an array $q=[a,b,c,d]$, this computes:
$$x=sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2}}{2}}$$
And returns:
$$left[x,frac{b}{2x},frac{c}{2x},frac{d}{2x}right]$$
q => // q = input array
q.map(v => // for each value v in q:
1 / q ? // if q is numeric (2nd to 4th iteration):
v / 2 / q // yield v / 2q
: // else (1st iteration, with v = a):
q = ( // compute x (as defined above) and store it in q
(v + Math.hypot(...q)) // we use Math.hypot(...q) to compute:
/ 2 // (q[0]**2 + q[1]**2 + q[2]**2 + q[3]**2) ** 0.5
) ** .5 // yield x
) // end of map()
JavaScript (ES7), 55 53 bytes
Based on the direct formula used by xnor.
Takes input as an array.
q=>q.map(v=>1/q?v/2/q:q=((v+Math.hypot(...q))/2)**.5)
Try it online!
How?
Given an array $q=[a,b,c,d]$, this computes:
$$x=sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2}}{2}}$$
And returns:
$$left[x,frac{b}{2x},frac{c}{2x},frac{d}{2x}right]$$
q => // q = input array
q.map(v => // for each value v in q:
1 / q ? // if q is numeric (2nd to 4th iteration):
v / 2 / q // yield v / 2q
: // else (1st iteration, with v = a):
q = ( // compute x (as defined above) and store it in q
(v + Math.hypot(...q)) // we use Math.hypot(...q) to compute:
/ 2 // (q[0]**2 + q[1]**2 + q[2]**2 + q[3]**2) ** 0.5
) ** .5 // yield x
) // end of map()
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
Arnauld
68.7k584289
68.7k584289
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Haskell, 51 bytes
f(a:l)|r<-a+sqrt(sum$(^2)<$>a:l)=(/sqrt(r*2))<$>r:l
Try it online!
A direct formula. The main trick to express the real part of the output as r/sqrt(r*2)
to parallel the imaginary part expression, which saves a few bytes over:
54 bytes
f(a:l)|s<-sqrt$2*(a+sqrt(sum$(^2)<$>a:l))=s/2:map(/s)l
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Haskell, 51 bytes
f(a:l)|r<-a+sqrt(sum$(^2)<$>a:l)=(/sqrt(r*2))<$>r:l
Try it online!
A direct formula. The main trick to express the real part of the output as r/sqrt(r*2)
to parallel the imaginary part expression, which saves a few bytes over:
54 bytes
f(a:l)|s<-sqrt$2*(a+sqrt(sum$(^2)<$>a:l))=s/2:map(/s)l
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Haskell, 51 bytes
f(a:l)|r<-a+sqrt(sum$(^2)<$>a:l)=(/sqrt(r*2))<$>r:l
Try it online!
A direct formula. The main trick to express the real part of the output as r/sqrt(r*2)
to parallel the imaginary part expression, which saves a few bytes over:
54 bytes
f(a:l)|s<-sqrt$2*(a+sqrt(sum$(^2)<$>a:l))=s/2:map(/s)l
Try it online!
Haskell, 51 bytes
f(a:l)|r<-a+sqrt(sum$(^2)<$>a:l)=(/sqrt(r*2))<$>r:l
Try it online!
A direct formula. The main trick to express the real part of the output as r/sqrt(r*2)
to parallel the imaginary part expression, which saves a few bytes over:
54 bytes
f(a:l)|s<-sqrt$2*(a+sqrt(sum$(^2)<$>a:l))=s/2:map(/s)l
Try it online!
answered 2 days ago
xnor
88.7k18183436
88.7k18183436
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Java 8, 84 bytes
(a,b,c,d)->(a=Math.sqrt(2*(a+Math.sqrt(a*a+b*b+c*c+d*d))))/2+" "+b/a+" "+c/a+" "+d/a
Port of @xnor's Python 2 answer.
Try it online.
Explanation:
(a,b,c,d)-> // Method with four double parameters and String return-type
(a= // Change `a` to:
Math.sqrt( // The square root of:
2* // Two times:
(a+ // `a` plus,
Math.sqrt( // the square-root of:
a*a // `a` squared,
+b*b // `b` squared,
+c*c // `c` squared,
+d*d)))) // And `d` squared summed together
/2 // Then return this modified `a` divided by 2
+" "+b/a // `b` divided by the modified `a`
+" "+c/a // `c` divided by the modified `a`
+" "+d/a // And `d` divided by the modified `a`, with space delimiters
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Java 8, 84 bytes
(a,b,c,d)->(a=Math.sqrt(2*(a+Math.sqrt(a*a+b*b+c*c+d*d))))/2+" "+b/a+" "+c/a+" "+d/a
Port of @xnor's Python 2 answer.
Try it online.
Explanation:
(a,b,c,d)-> // Method with four double parameters and String return-type
(a= // Change `a` to:
Math.sqrt( // The square root of:
2* // Two times:
(a+ // `a` plus,
Math.sqrt( // the square-root of:
a*a // `a` squared,
+b*b // `b` squared,
+c*c // `c` squared,
+d*d)))) // And `d` squared summed together
/2 // Then return this modified `a` divided by 2
+" "+b/a // `b` divided by the modified `a`
+" "+c/a // `c` divided by the modified `a`
+" "+d/a // And `d` divided by the modified `a`, with space delimiters
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Java 8, 84 bytes
(a,b,c,d)->(a=Math.sqrt(2*(a+Math.sqrt(a*a+b*b+c*c+d*d))))/2+" "+b/a+" "+c/a+" "+d/a
Port of @xnor's Python 2 answer.
Try it online.
Explanation:
(a,b,c,d)-> // Method with four double parameters and String return-type
(a= // Change `a` to:
Math.sqrt( // The square root of:
2* // Two times:
(a+ // `a` plus,
Math.sqrt( // the square-root of:
a*a // `a` squared,
+b*b // `b` squared,
+c*c // `c` squared,
+d*d)))) // And `d` squared summed together
/2 // Then return this modified `a` divided by 2
+" "+b/a // `b` divided by the modified `a`
+" "+c/a // `c` divided by the modified `a`
+" "+d/a // And `d` divided by the modified `a`, with space delimiters
Java 8, 84 bytes
(a,b,c,d)->(a=Math.sqrt(2*(a+Math.sqrt(a*a+b*b+c*c+d*d))))/2+" "+b/a+" "+c/a+" "+d/a
Port of @xnor's Python 2 answer.
Try it online.
Explanation:
(a,b,c,d)-> // Method with four double parameters and String return-type
(a= // Change `a` to:
Math.sqrt( // The square root of:
2* // Two times:
(a+ // `a` plus,
Math.sqrt( // the square-root of:
a*a // `a` squared,
+b*b // `b` squared,
+c*c // `c` squared,
+d*d)))) // And `d` squared summed together
/2 // Then return this modified `a` divided by 2
+" "+b/a // `b` divided by the modified `a`
+" "+c/a // `c` divided by the modified `a`
+" "+d/a // And `d` divided by the modified `a`, with space delimiters
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Kevin Cruijssen
34k554181
34k554181
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Charcoal, 32 bytes
≔X⊗⁺§θ⁰XΣEθ×ιι·⁵¦·⁵η≧∕ηθ§≔θ⁰⊘ηIθ
Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Port of @xnor's Python answer. Explanation:
≔X⊗⁺§θ⁰XΣEθ×ιι·⁵¦·⁵η
Square all of the elements of the input and take the sum, then take the square root. This calculates $ | x + yvec{u} | = sqrt{ x^2 + y^2 } = sqrt{ (a^2 - b^2)^2 + (2ab)^2 } = a^2 + b^2 $. Adding $ x $ gives $ 2a^2 $ which is then doubled and square rooted to give $ 2a $.
≧∕ηθ
Because $ y = 2ab $, calculate $ b $ by dividing by $ 2a $.
§≔θ⁰⊘η
Set the first element of the array (i.e. the real part) to half of $ 2a $.
Iθ
Cast the values to string and implicitly print.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Charcoal, 32 bytes
≔X⊗⁺§θ⁰XΣEθ×ιι·⁵¦·⁵η≧∕ηθ§≔θ⁰⊘ηIθ
Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Port of @xnor's Python answer. Explanation:
≔X⊗⁺§θ⁰XΣEθ×ιι·⁵¦·⁵η
Square all of the elements of the input and take the sum, then take the square root. This calculates $ | x + yvec{u} | = sqrt{ x^2 + y^2 } = sqrt{ (a^2 - b^2)^2 + (2ab)^2 } = a^2 + b^2 $. Adding $ x $ gives $ 2a^2 $ which is then doubled and square rooted to give $ 2a $.
≧∕ηθ
Because $ y = 2ab $, calculate $ b $ by dividing by $ 2a $.
§≔θ⁰⊘η
Set the first element of the array (i.e. the real part) to half of $ 2a $.
Iθ
Cast the values to string and implicitly print.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Charcoal, 32 bytes
≔X⊗⁺§θ⁰XΣEθ×ιι·⁵¦·⁵η≧∕ηθ§≔θ⁰⊘ηIθ
Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Port of @xnor's Python answer. Explanation:
≔X⊗⁺§θ⁰XΣEθ×ιι·⁵¦·⁵η
Square all of the elements of the input and take the sum, then take the square root. This calculates $ | x + yvec{u} | = sqrt{ x^2 + y^2 } = sqrt{ (a^2 - b^2)^2 + (2ab)^2 } = a^2 + b^2 $. Adding $ x $ gives $ 2a^2 $ which is then doubled and square rooted to give $ 2a $.
≧∕ηθ
Because $ y = 2ab $, calculate $ b $ by dividing by $ 2a $.
§≔θ⁰⊘η
Set the first element of the array (i.e. the real part) to half of $ 2a $.
Iθ
Cast the values to string and implicitly print.
Charcoal, 32 bytes
≔X⊗⁺§θ⁰XΣEθ×ιι·⁵¦·⁵η≧∕ηθ§≔θ⁰⊘ηIθ
Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Port of @xnor's Python answer. Explanation:
≔X⊗⁺§θ⁰XΣEθ×ιι·⁵¦·⁵η
Square all of the elements of the input and take the sum, then take the square root. This calculates $ | x + yvec{u} | = sqrt{ x^2 + y^2 } = sqrt{ (a^2 - b^2)^2 + (2ab)^2 } = a^2 + b^2 $. Adding $ x $ gives $ 2a^2 $ which is then doubled and square rooted to give $ 2a $.
≧∕ηθ
Because $ y = 2ab $, calculate $ b $ by dividing by $ 2a $.
§≔θ⁰⊘η
Set the first element of the array (i.e. the real part) to half of $ 2a $.
Iθ
Cast the values to string and implicitly print.
answered 2 days ago
Neil
77.9k744174
77.9k744174
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
05AB1E, 14 bytes
nOtsн+·t©/¦®;š
Port of @xnor's Python 2 answer.
Try it online or verify all test cases.
Explanation:
n # Square each number in the (implicit) input-list
O # Sum them
t # Take the square-root of that
sн+ # Add the first item of the input-list
· # Double it
t # Take the square-root of it
© # Store it in the register (without popping)
/ # Divide each value in the (implicit) input with it
¦ # Remove the first item
®; # Push the value from the register again, and halve it
š # Prepend it to the list (and output implicitly)
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
05AB1E, 14 bytes
nOtsн+·t©/¦®;š
Port of @xnor's Python 2 answer.
Try it online or verify all test cases.
Explanation:
n # Square each number in the (implicit) input-list
O # Sum them
t # Take the square-root of that
sн+ # Add the first item of the input-list
· # Double it
t # Take the square-root of it
© # Store it in the register (without popping)
/ # Divide each value in the (implicit) input with it
¦ # Remove the first item
®; # Push the value from the register again, and halve it
š # Prepend it to the list (and output implicitly)
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
05AB1E, 14 bytes
nOtsн+·t©/¦®;š
Port of @xnor's Python 2 answer.
Try it online or verify all test cases.
Explanation:
n # Square each number in the (implicit) input-list
O # Sum them
t # Take the square-root of that
sн+ # Add the first item of the input-list
· # Double it
t # Take the square-root of it
© # Store it in the register (without popping)
/ # Divide each value in the (implicit) input with it
¦ # Remove the first item
®; # Push the value from the register again, and halve it
š # Prepend it to the list (and output implicitly)
05AB1E, 14 bytes
nOtsн+·t©/¦®;š
Port of @xnor's Python 2 answer.
Try it online or verify all test cases.
Explanation:
n # Square each number in the (implicit) input-list
O # Sum them
t # Take the square-root of that
sн+ # Add the first item of the input-list
· # Double it
t # Take the square-root of it
© # Store it in the register (without popping)
/ # Divide each value in the (implicit) input with it
¦ # Remove the first item
®; # Push the value from the register again, and halve it
š # Prepend it to the list (and output implicitly)
answered yesterday
Kevin Cruijssen
34k554181
34k554181
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 28 bytes
{s=#+Norm@{##},##2}/(2s)^.5&
Port of @xnor's Python 2 answer.
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 28 bytes
{s=#+Norm@{##},##2}/(2s)^.5&
Port of @xnor's Python 2 answer.
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 28 bytes
{s=#+Norm@{##},##2}/(2s)^.5&
Port of @xnor's Python 2 answer.
Try it online!
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 28 bytes
{s=#+Norm@{##},##2}/(2s)^.5&
Port of @xnor's Python 2 answer.
Try it online!
answered yesterday
alephalpha
20.9k32888
20.9k32888
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
C# .NET, 88 bytes
(a,b,c,d)=>((a=System.Math.Sqrt(2*(a+System.Math.Sqrt(a*a+b*b+c*c+d*d))))/2,b/a,c/a,d/a)
Port of my Java 8 answer, but returns a Tuple instead of a String. I thought that would have been shorter, but unfortunately the Math.Sqrt
require a System
-import in C# .NET, ending up at 4 bytes longer instead of 10 bytes shorter.. >.>
The lambda declaration looks pretty funny, though:
System.Func<double, double, double, double, (double, double, double, double)> f =
Try it online.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
C# .NET, 88 bytes
(a,b,c,d)=>((a=System.Math.Sqrt(2*(a+System.Math.Sqrt(a*a+b*b+c*c+d*d))))/2,b/a,c/a,d/a)
Port of my Java 8 answer, but returns a Tuple instead of a String. I thought that would have been shorter, but unfortunately the Math.Sqrt
require a System
-import in C# .NET, ending up at 4 bytes longer instead of 10 bytes shorter.. >.>
The lambda declaration looks pretty funny, though:
System.Func<double, double, double, double, (double, double, double, double)> f =
Try it online.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
C# .NET, 88 bytes
(a,b,c,d)=>((a=System.Math.Sqrt(2*(a+System.Math.Sqrt(a*a+b*b+c*c+d*d))))/2,b/a,c/a,d/a)
Port of my Java 8 answer, but returns a Tuple instead of a String. I thought that would have been shorter, but unfortunately the Math.Sqrt
require a System
-import in C# .NET, ending up at 4 bytes longer instead of 10 bytes shorter.. >.>
The lambda declaration looks pretty funny, though:
System.Func<double, double, double, double, (double, double, double, double)> f =
Try it online.
C# .NET, 88 bytes
(a,b,c,d)=>((a=System.Math.Sqrt(2*(a+System.Math.Sqrt(a*a+b*b+c*c+d*d))))/2,b/a,c/a,d/a)
Port of my Java 8 answer, but returns a Tuple instead of a String. I thought that would have been shorter, but unfortunately the Math.Sqrt
require a System
-import in C# .NET, ending up at 4 bytes longer instead of 10 bytes shorter.. >.>
The lambda declaration looks pretty funny, though:
System.Func<double, double, double, double, (double, double, double, double)> f =
Try it online.
answered yesterday
Kevin Cruijssen
34k554181
34k554181
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Perl 6, 49 bytes
{;(*+@^b>>².sum**.5*i).sqrt.&{.re,(@b X/2*.re)}}
Try it online!
Curried function taking input as f(b,c,d)(a)
. Returns quaternion as a,(b,c,d)
.
Explanation
{; } # Block returning WhateverCode
@^b>>².sum**.5 # Compute B of quaternion written as q = a + B*u
# (length of vector (b,c,d))
(*+ *i) # Complex number a + B*i
.sqrt # Square root of complex number
.&{ } # Return
.re, # Real part of square root
(@b X/2*.re) # b,c,d divided by 2* real part
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Perl 6, 49 bytes
{;(*+@^b>>².sum**.5*i).sqrt.&{.re,(@b X/2*.re)}}
Try it online!
Curried function taking input as f(b,c,d)(a)
. Returns quaternion as a,(b,c,d)
.
Explanation
{; } # Block returning WhateverCode
@^b>>².sum**.5 # Compute B of quaternion written as q = a + B*u
# (length of vector (b,c,d))
(*+ *i) # Complex number a + B*i
.sqrt # Square root of complex number
.&{ } # Return
.re, # Real part of square root
(@b X/2*.re) # b,c,d divided by 2* real part
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Perl 6, 49 bytes
{;(*+@^b>>².sum**.5*i).sqrt.&{.re,(@b X/2*.re)}}
Try it online!
Curried function taking input as f(b,c,d)(a)
. Returns quaternion as a,(b,c,d)
.
Explanation
{; } # Block returning WhateverCode
@^b>>².sum**.5 # Compute B of quaternion written as q = a + B*u
# (length of vector (b,c,d))
(*+ *i) # Complex number a + B*i
.sqrt # Square root of complex number
.&{ } # Return
.re, # Real part of square root
(@b X/2*.re) # b,c,d divided by 2* real part
Perl 6, 49 bytes
{;(*+@^b>>².sum**.5*i).sqrt.&{.re,(@b X/2*.re)}}
Try it online!
Curried function taking input as f(b,c,d)(a)
. Returns quaternion as a,(b,c,d)
.
Explanation
{; } # Block returning WhateverCode
@^b>>².sum**.5 # Compute B of quaternion written as q = a + B*u
# (length of vector (b,c,d))
(*+ *i) # Complex number a + B*i
.sqrt # Square root of complex number
.&{ } # Return
.re, # Real part of square root
(@b X/2*.re) # b,c,d divided by 2* real part
answered yesterday
nwellnhof
5,8581121
5,8581121
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f176048%2fquaternion-square-root%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Can we take the quaternion as
a, (b, c, d)
?– nwellnhof
yesterday
@nwellnhof Sure. Even something like
a,[b,[c,[d]]]
is fine, if you can somehow save bytes with it :)– Bubbler
yesterday