Why are my new files not getting the group writeable permission?












0














I would like to set up a directory such that all new files are group writeable, regardless of the umask setting of the individual user.



I've created a stor group and added all users to it. Then, I created the folder:



$ mkdir uaroot

$ chgrp stor uaroot

$ ls -l

total 4

drwxr-xr-x  2 ua  stor  512 Dec 27 14:35 uaroot


I set the ACLs for it:



$ setfacl -d -m u::rwx,g::rwx,o::rx,mask::rwx uaroot

$ setfacl -m u::rwx,g::rwx,o::rx,mask::rwx uaroot

$ ls -l

total 8

drwxrwxr-x+ 2 ua  stor  512 Dec 27 14:35 uaroot


I can see the ACLs set as:



$ getfacl uaroot

# file: uaroot

# owner: ua

# group: stor

user::rwx

group::rwx

mask::rwx

other::r-x



$ getfacl -d uaroot

# file: uaroot

# owner: ua

# group: stor

user::rwx

group::rwx

mask::rwx

other::r-x


I thought this will have files inside this directory automatically get group writeable permission, but this wasn't the case:



$ cd uaroot

$ touch a

$ ls -l

total 4

-rw-r--r--+ 1 ua  stor  0 Dec 27 14:38 a



$ getfacl a

# file: a

# owner: ua

# group: stor

user::rw-

group::rwx      # effective: r--

mask::r--

other::r--


What does the effective callout mean above? What am I missing in order to have all files get group writeable permission?






permissions acl






share



























    0














    I would like to set up a directory such that all new files are group writeable, regardless of the umask setting of the individual user.



    I've created a stor group and added all users to it. Then, I created the folder:



    $ mkdir uaroot
    
$ chgrp stor uaroot
    
$ ls -l
    
total 4
    
drwxr-xr-x  2 ua  stor  512 Dec 27 14:35 uaroot


    I set the ACLs for it:



    $ setfacl -d -m u::rwx,g::rwx,o::rx,mask::rwx uaroot
    
$ setfacl -m u::rwx,g::rwx,o::rx,mask::rwx uaroot
    
$ ls -l
    
total 8
    
drwxrwxr-x+ 2 ua  stor  512 Dec 27 14:35 uaroot


    I can see the ACLs set as:



    $ getfacl uaroot
    
# file: uaroot
    
# owner: ua
    
# group: stor
    
user::rwx
    
group::rwx
    
mask::rwx
    
other::r-x
    

    
$ getfacl -d uaroot
    
# file: uaroot
    
# owner: ua
    
# group: stor
    
user::rwx
    
group::rwx
    
mask::rwx
    
other::r-x


    I thought this will have files inside this directory automatically get group writeable permission, but this wasn't the case:



    $ cd uaroot
    
$ touch a
    
$ ls -l
    
total 4
    
-rw-r--r--+ 1 ua  stor  0 Dec 27 14:38 a
    

    
$ getfacl a
    
# file: a
    
# owner: ua
    
# group: stor
    
user::rw-
    
group::rwx      # effective: r--
    
mask::r--
    
other::r--


    What does the effective callout mean above? What am I missing in order to have all files get group writeable permission?






    permissions acl






    share

























      0












      0








      0







      I would like to set up a directory such that all new files are group writeable, regardless of the umask setting of the individual user.



      I've created a stor group and added all users to it. Then, I created the folder:



      $ mkdir uaroot
      
$ chgrp stor uaroot
      
$ ls -l
      
total 4
      
drwxr-xr-x  2 ua  stor  512 Dec 27 14:35 uaroot


      I set the ACLs for it:



      $ setfacl -d -m u::rwx,g::rwx,o::rx,mask::rwx uaroot
      
$ setfacl -m u::rwx,g::rwx,o::rx,mask::rwx uaroot
      
$ ls -l
      
total 8
      
drwxrwxr-x+ 2 ua  stor  512 Dec 27 14:35 uaroot


      I can see the ACLs set as:



      $ getfacl uaroot
      
# file: uaroot
      
# owner: ua
      
# group: stor
      
user::rwx
      
group::rwx
      
mask::rwx
      
other::r-x
      

      
$ getfacl -d uaroot
      
# file: uaroot
      
# owner: ua
      
# group: stor
      
user::rwx
      
group::rwx
      
mask::rwx
      
other::r-x


      I thought this will have files inside this directory automatically get group writeable permission, but this wasn't the case:



      $ cd uaroot
      
$ touch a
      
$ ls -l
      
total 4
      
-rw-r--r--+ 1 ua  stor  0 Dec 27 14:38 a
      

      
$ getfacl a
      
# file: a
      
# owner: ua
      
# group: stor
      
user::rw-
      
group::rwx      # effective: r--
      
mask::r--
      
other::r--


      What does the effective callout mean above? What am I missing in order to have all files get group writeable permission?






      permissions acl






      share













      I would like to set up a directory such that all new files are group writeable, regardless of the umask setting of the individual user.



      I've created a stor group and added all users to it. Then, I created the folder:



      $ mkdir uaroot
      
$ chgrp stor uaroot
      
$ ls -l
      
total 4
      
drwxr-xr-x  2 ua  stor  512 Dec 27 14:35 uaroot


      I set the ACLs for it:



      $ setfacl -d -m u::rwx,g::rwx,o::rx,mask::rwx uaroot
      
$ setfacl -m u::rwx,g::rwx,o::rx,mask::rwx uaroot
      
$ ls -l
      
total 8
      
drwxrwxr-x+ 2 ua  stor  512 Dec 27 14:35 uaroot


      I can see the ACLs set as:



      $ getfacl uaroot
      
# file: uaroot
      
# owner: ua
      
# group: stor
      
user::rwx
      
group::rwx
      
mask::rwx
      
other::r-x
      

      
$ getfacl -d uaroot
      
# file: uaroot
      
# owner: ua
      
# group: stor
      
user::rwx
      
group::rwx
      
mask::rwx
      
other::r-x


      I thought this will have files inside this directory automatically get group writeable permission, but this wasn't the case:



      $ cd uaroot
      
$ touch a
      
$ ls -l
      
total 4
      
-rw-r--r--+ 1 ua  stor  0 Dec 27 14:38 a
      

      
$ getfacl a
      
# file: a
      
# owner: ua
      
# group: stor
      
user::rw-
      
group::rwx      # effective: r--
      
mask::r--
      
other::r--


      What does the effective callout mean above? What am I missing in order to have all files get group writeable permission?






      permissions acl




      permissions acl





      share












      share










      share



      share










      asked 5 mins ago









      Roxy

      1363




      1363



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491252%2fwhy-are-my-new-files-not-getting-the-group-writeable-permission%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491252%2fwhy-are-my-new-files-not-getting-the-group-writeable-permission%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Accessing regular linux commands in Huawei's Dopra Linux

          Image
          4 Backstory: I have a Huawei HG8245 router in my house and I want to change the default username/password. I've tried following this guide but the config file always gets reset. My ISP isn't helping either so I'm looking for other ways to accomplish this. The router has telnet access so this seems like a way to change the credentials. The first shell I gain access to looks like this: WAP> Pressing "?" gives me a list of available commands which I've pasted here, the two interesting ones are "su" and "shell". I can't seem to get su access, even after logging in as root (challenge password prompt, and then nothing happens), but shell gives me a proper linux shell. WAP>shell BusyBox v1.18.4 (2017-12-26 17:06:34 CST) built-in shell (ash) Enter 'hel...
          Read more

          Can't connect RFCOMM socket: Host is down

          Image
          up vote 3 down vote favorite I have bluez 5.4.3 and I am attempting to communicate with a ble device through minicom. These two deceives (my computer and a bluno nano) are alreadt paired and this has been my method so far. #bluetoothctl # pair xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx # exit Everything is working well so far then... #sudo rfcomm connect /dev/rfcomm0 xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx 1 & [1] 3665 Can't connect RFCOMM socket: Host is down Does anyone know how to resolve this issue? Any help would be very much appreciated. bluetooth bluez share | improve this question asked Feb 9 '17 at 18:46 Brandon Knape 46 2 ...
          Read more

          Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal Exception in Interrupt

          Image
          0 Every day this error occured on my pc, kernel panic error on interrupt, what will be the problem? linux-mint share asked 6 mins ago Vinod Selvin Vinod Selvin 1 1 New contributor Vinod Selvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct. add a comment ...
          Read more