How to log every instruction and change in memory in any process












0














I read here this:




Falco depends on a kernel module that taps into the stream of system calls on a machine and passes those system calls to user space.




(Emphasis mine).



That hints at the possibility of logging arbitrary instruction invocations from arbitrary processes (but not quite), which is what I would like to know how to do.



I've been recommended ptrace/strace/dtrace/gdb (I have a Mac), but I would like to know what low-level, probably kernel-level feature I could write a kernel module for that would log any process already running in the background on my machine. In the same way that ps lists the running processes, and top keeps an updated panel of them with some stats, I would like to basically control a process completely. That is, given pid 123, I would do pause 123 or step 123 to pause or make one step in the program, and then inspect 123 to look at the complete memory layout of the computer to see what the memory is that has changed. All of this without ptrace/dtrace/strace/gdb.



This is probably a broad topic, but I would like to be pointed to the right area on where to look for more information. Specifically this seems like it could be a kernel module, and so access some features exposed by the kernel API. I'm not sure though if this is technically possible (to watch any process from the outside, at any time, and control its evaluation), or if any part of this is possible. I would first like to know what parts of this are/aren't possible, and then where I can look for more information.



The few tutorials on gdb I've seen all want you to run/invoke your program/script with gdb directly, as in gdb myscript. That makes sense how it could get access to the stepping/pausing/etc. behaviors of the program. But I would like to go further than that. Instead of requiring your program (like gdb) to invoke the program directly, instead it works by attaching to a program already running in the background. And then, just by attaching to the program from the outside, it allows you to pause/step/inspect/etc.. Not sure if this is possible. But this way I could inspect the daemons and other things my computer is doing from the get go.









share







New contributor




user10869858 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    0














    I read here this:




    Falco depends on a kernel module that taps into the stream of system calls on a machine and passes those system calls to user space.




    (Emphasis mine).



    That hints at the possibility of logging arbitrary instruction invocations from arbitrary processes (but not quite), which is what I would like to know how to do.



    I've been recommended ptrace/strace/dtrace/gdb (I have a Mac), but I would like to know what low-level, probably kernel-level feature I could write a kernel module for that would log any process already running in the background on my machine. In the same way that ps lists the running processes, and top keeps an updated panel of them with some stats, I would like to basically control a process completely. That is, given pid 123, I would do pause 123 or step 123 to pause or make one step in the program, and then inspect 123 to look at the complete memory layout of the computer to see what the memory is that has changed. All of this without ptrace/dtrace/strace/gdb.



    This is probably a broad topic, but I would like to be pointed to the right area on where to look for more information. Specifically this seems like it could be a kernel module, and so access some features exposed by the kernel API. I'm not sure though if this is technically possible (to watch any process from the outside, at any time, and control its evaluation), or if any part of this is possible. I would first like to know what parts of this are/aren't possible, and then where I can look for more information.



    The few tutorials on gdb I've seen all want you to run/invoke your program/script with gdb directly, as in gdb myscript. That makes sense how it could get access to the stepping/pausing/etc. behaviors of the program. But I would like to go further than that. Instead of requiring your program (like gdb) to invoke the program directly, instead it works by attaching to a program already running in the background. And then, just by attaching to the program from the outside, it allows you to pause/step/inspect/etc.. Not sure if this is possible. But this way I could inspect the daemons and other things my computer is doing from the get go.









    share







    New contributor




    user10869858 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      0












      0








      0







      I read here this:




      Falco depends on a kernel module that taps into the stream of system calls on a machine and passes those system calls to user space.




      (Emphasis mine).



      That hints at the possibility of logging arbitrary instruction invocations from arbitrary processes (but not quite), which is what I would like to know how to do.



      I've been recommended ptrace/strace/dtrace/gdb (I have a Mac), but I would like to know what low-level, probably kernel-level feature I could write a kernel module for that would log any process already running in the background on my machine. In the same way that ps lists the running processes, and top keeps an updated panel of them with some stats, I would like to basically control a process completely. That is, given pid 123, I would do pause 123 or step 123 to pause or make one step in the program, and then inspect 123 to look at the complete memory layout of the computer to see what the memory is that has changed. All of this without ptrace/dtrace/strace/gdb.



      This is probably a broad topic, but I would like to be pointed to the right area on where to look for more information. Specifically this seems like it could be a kernel module, and so access some features exposed by the kernel API. I'm not sure though if this is technically possible (to watch any process from the outside, at any time, and control its evaluation), or if any part of this is possible. I would first like to know what parts of this are/aren't possible, and then where I can look for more information.



      The few tutorials on gdb I've seen all want you to run/invoke your program/script with gdb directly, as in gdb myscript. That makes sense how it could get access to the stepping/pausing/etc. behaviors of the program. But I would like to go further than that. Instead of requiring your program (like gdb) to invoke the program directly, instead it works by attaching to a program already running in the background. And then, just by attaching to the program from the outside, it allows you to pause/step/inspect/etc.. Not sure if this is possible. But this way I could inspect the daemons and other things my computer is doing from the get go.









      share







      New contributor




      user10869858 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      I read here this:




      Falco depends on a kernel module that taps into the stream of system calls on a machine and passes those system calls to user space.




      (Emphasis mine).



      That hints at the possibility of logging arbitrary instruction invocations from arbitrary processes (but not quite), which is what I would like to know how to do.



      I've been recommended ptrace/strace/dtrace/gdb (I have a Mac), but I would like to know what low-level, probably kernel-level feature I could write a kernel module for that would log any process already running in the background on my machine. In the same way that ps lists the running processes, and top keeps an updated panel of them with some stats, I would like to basically control a process completely. That is, given pid 123, I would do pause 123 or step 123 to pause or make one step in the program, and then inspect 123 to look at the complete memory layout of the computer to see what the memory is that has changed. All of this without ptrace/dtrace/strace/gdb.



      This is probably a broad topic, but I would like to be pointed to the right area on where to look for more information. Specifically this seems like it could be a kernel module, and so access some features exposed by the kernel API. I'm not sure though if this is technically possible (to watch any process from the outside, at any time, and control its evaluation), or if any part of this is possible. I would first like to know what parts of this are/aren't possible, and then where I can look for more information.



      The few tutorials on gdb I've seen all want you to run/invoke your program/script with gdb directly, as in gdb myscript. That makes sense how it could get access to the stepping/pausing/etc. behaviors of the program. But I would like to go further than that. Instead of requiring your program (like gdb) to invoke the program directly, instead it works by attaching to a program already running in the background. And then, just by attaching to the program from the outside, it allows you to pause/step/inspect/etc.. Not sure if this is possible. But this way I could inspect the daemons and other things my computer is doing from the get go.







      kernel process





      share







      New contributor




      user10869858 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share







      New contributor




      user10869858 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share



      share






      New contributor




      user10869858 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 3 mins ago









      user10869858user10869858

      11




      11




      New contributor




      user10869858 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      user10869858 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      user10869858 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          user10869858 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493620%2fhow-to-log-every-instruction-and-change-in-memory-in-any-process%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          user10869858 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          user10869858 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          user10869858 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          user10869858 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493620%2fhow-to-log-every-instruction-and-change-in-memory-in-any-process%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          サソリ

          広島県道265号伴広島線

          Setup Asymptote in Texstudio