How to make the correct hash-symbol in C Sharp (C#)

up vote
52
down vote

favorite

I want to make C# look nice in my book, but with the following:

C# it looks like this:

enter image description here

When it should look more like this:

enter image description here

For the second one, I used verbatim, but I don't want that and I've also used a macro like the following everywhere so it should be easy to replace:

defCsharp{C#}

Any suggestions on how I make this look correct?

Edit

I am writing a programming book, in the C# Language Specification, it looks like this:

enter image description here

edited Feb 14 '12 at 13:18

asked Feb 14 '12 at 13:00

Filip Ekberg

1,10341522

9

Use texttt{C#} for your second picture. And you'll find this question useful: Prettiest way to typeset “C++”?
– Leo Liu
Feb 14 '12 at 13:03

5

If it's about music, newcommand{textsharp}{$sharp$}
– egreg
Feb 14 '12 at 13:07

5

Don't use texttt{C#}. 'C' must be set in the normal font.
– Andrey Vihrov
Feb 14 '12 at 13:24

3

My opinion is that you should not fiddle with the symbol placement, because it will disrupt the read flow. Instead you should find/create a good-looking hash symbol that will not stand out. While most popular fonts have such a symbol, Computer Modern Roman/Sans Serif, unfortunately, does not.
– Andrey Vihrov
Feb 14 '12 at 14:07

4

@FilipEkberg Actually, it should be a sharp symbol as in a musical sharp note, it was intended to be this way, the only reason for a hash symbol can be summed up in ASCII. I believe some modern books use the originally intended musical sharp character.
– Ayman Elmasry
Feb 14 '12 at 14:46

|
show 10 more comments

up vote
52
down vote

favorite

I want to make C# look nice in my book, but with the following:

C# it looks like this:

enter image description here

When it should look more like this:

enter image description here

For the second one, I used verbatim, but I don't want that and I've also used a macro like the following everywhere so it should be easy to replace:

defCsharp{C#}

Any suggestions on how I make this look correct?

Edit

I am writing a programming book, in the C# Language Specification, it looks like this:

enter image description here

edited Feb 14 '12 at 13:18

asked Feb 14 '12 at 13:00

Filip Ekberg

1,10341522

9

Use texttt{C#} for your second picture. And you'll find this question useful: Prettiest way to typeset “C++”?
– Leo Liu
Feb 14 '12 at 13:03

5

If it's about music, newcommand{textsharp}{$sharp$}
– egreg
Feb 14 '12 at 13:07

5

Don't use texttt{C#}. 'C' must be set in the normal font.
– Andrey Vihrov
Feb 14 '12 at 13:24

3

My opinion is that you should not fiddle with the symbol placement, because it will disrupt the read flow. Instead you should find/create a good-looking hash symbol that will not stand out. While most popular fonts have such a symbol, Computer Modern Roman/Sans Serif, unfortunately, does not.
– Andrey Vihrov
Feb 14 '12 at 14:07

4

@FilipEkberg Actually, it should be a sharp symbol as in a musical sharp note, it was intended to be this way, the only reason for a hash symbol can be summed up in ASCII. I believe some modern books use the originally intended musical sharp character.
– Ayman Elmasry
Feb 14 '12 at 14:46

|
show 10 more comments

up vote
52
down vote

favorite

I want to make C# look nice in my book, but with the following:

C# it looks like this:

enter image description here

When it should look more like this:

enter image description here

For the second one, I used verbatim, but I don't want that and I've also used a macro like the following everywhere so it should be easy to replace:

defCsharp{C#}

Any suggestions on how I make this look correct?

Edit

I am writing a programming book, in the C# Language Specification, it looks like this:

enter image description here

edited Feb 14 '12 at 13:18

asked Feb 14 '12 at 13:00

Filip Ekberg

1,10341522

I want to make C# look nice in my book, but with the following:

C# it looks like this:

enter image description here

When it should look more like this:

enter image description here

For the second one, I used verbatim, but I don't want that and I've also used a macro like the following everywhere so it should be easy to replace:

defCsharp{C#}

Any suggestions on how I make this look correct?

Edit

I am writing a programming book, in the C# Language Specification, it looks like this:

enter image description here

symbols

edited Feb 14 '12 at 13:18

asked Feb 14 '12 at 13:00

Filip Ekberg

1,10341522

edited Feb 14 '12 at 13:18

asked Feb 14 '12 at 13:00

Filip Ekberg

1,10341522

edited Feb 14 '12 at 13:18

asked Feb 14 '12 at 13:00

Filip Ekberg

1,10341522

asked Feb 14 '12 at 13:00

Filip Ekberg

1,10341522

asked Feb 14 '12 at 13:00

Filip Ekberg

1,10341522

9

Use texttt{C#} for your second picture. And you'll find this question useful: Prettiest way to typeset “C++”?
– Leo Liu
Feb 14 '12 at 13:03

5

If it's about music, newcommand{textsharp}{$sharp$}
– egreg
Feb 14 '12 at 13:07

5

Don't use texttt{C#}. 'C' must be set in the normal font.
– Andrey Vihrov
Feb 14 '12 at 13:24

3

My opinion is that you should not fiddle with the symbol placement, because it will disrupt the read flow. Instead you should find/create a good-looking hash symbol that will not stand out. While most popular fonts have such a symbol, Computer Modern Roman/Sans Serif, unfortunately, does not.
– Andrey Vihrov
Feb 14 '12 at 14:07

4

@FilipEkberg Actually, it should be a sharp symbol as in a musical sharp note, it was intended to be this way, the only reason for a hash symbol can be summed up in ASCII. I believe some modern books use the originally intended musical sharp character.
– Ayman Elmasry
Feb 14 '12 at 14:46

|
show 10 more comments

9

Use texttt{C#} for your second picture. And you'll find this question useful: Prettiest way to typeset “C++”?
– Leo Liu
Feb 14 '12 at 13:03

5

If it's about music, newcommand{textsharp}{$sharp$}
– egreg
Feb 14 '12 at 13:07

5

Don't use texttt{C#}. 'C' must be set in the normal font.
– Andrey Vihrov
Feb 14 '12 at 13:24

3

My opinion is that you should not fiddle with the symbol placement, because it will disrupt the read flow. Instead you should find/create a good-looking hash symbol that will not stand out. While most popular fonts have such a symbol, Computer Modern Roman/Sans Serif, unfortunately, does not.
– Andrey Vihrov
Feb 14 '12 at 14:07

4

@FilipEkberg Actually, it should be a sharp symbol as in a musical sharp note, it was intended to be this way, the only reason for a hash symbol can be summed up in ASCII. I believe some modern books use the originally intended musical sharp character.
– Ayman Elmasry
Feb 14 '12 at 14:46

Use texttt{C#} for your second picture. And you'll find this question useful: Prettiest way to typeset “C++”?
– Leo Liu
Feb 14 '12 at 13:03

If it's about music, newcommand{textsharp}{$sharp$}
– egreg
Feb 14 '12 at 13:07

Don't use texttt{C#}. 'C' must be set in the normal font.
– Andrey Vihrov
Feb 14 '12 at 13:24

My opinion is that you should not fiddle with the symbol placement, because it will disrupt the read flow. Instead you should find/create a good-looking hash symbol that will not stand out. While most popular fonts have such a symbol, Computer Modern Roman/Sans Serif, unfortunately, does not.
– Andrey Vihrov
Feb 14 '12 at 14:07

@FilipEkberg Actually, it should be a sharp symbol as in a musical sharp note, it was intended to be this way, the only reason for a hash symbol can be summed up in ASCII. I believe some modern books use the originally intended musical sharp character.
– Ayman Elmasry
Feb 14 '12 at 14:46

|
show 10 more comments

11 Answers
11

active

oldest

votes

up vote
22
down vote

accepted

Since Computer Modern Roman does not have a fitting hash symbol, we need to look somewhere else. I experimented with several popular fonts and found that the hash symbol from Liberation Serif does not stand out, has approximately the same brush width and isn't too wide.

Result

Unfortunately, as Liberation Serif is a TrueType font, it can't be readily used with pdfTeX. Below is the code to use it with XeTeX/LuaTeX.

documentclass{article}



usepackage{fontspec}



newfontfacelserif{Liberation Serif}



newcommand{Csh}{C{lserif#}}



begin{document}



Some text Csh{} some text.



end{document}

Workaround for pdfTeX

Process this file with XeTeX/LuaTeX and save the result as hash-symbol.pdf:

documentclass[border=0pt]{standalone}

usepackage{fontspec}

begin{document}% I get extra space without this comment

fontspec{Liberation Serif}#

end{document}

Then use this code to include the symbol with pdfTeX:

documentclass{article}



usepackage{graphicx}



newcommand{Csh}{Cincludegraphics{hash-symbol}}



begin{document}



Some text Csh{} some text.



end{document}

enter image description here

The positioning of the symbol might be slightly off, use kern and raisebox to fine-tune. Also note that this will only work for one font size; to remedy this, scalebox might be useful (manual).

edited Feb 15 '12 at 8:29

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:38

Andrey Vihrov

18.2k375101

1

It's a nice start, I need it to work with pdfText though, maybe someone else has some ideas on this too. Thanks!
– Filip Ekberg
Feb 14 '12 at 14:52

2

@Filip You might consider switching anyway. While pdfTeX has served well, I would say that we might soon start to call it obsolete. Modern TeX implementations are simply superior in so many regards.
– Konrad Rudolph
Feb 14 '12 at 15:30

1

@KonradRudolph, pdflatex was what came with texlive/texniccenter. You're saying I should upgrade to something else?
– Filip Ekberg
Feb 14 '12 at 17:09

1

@Filip TeXnicCenter is an editor (and a pretty crappy one at that, speak Unicode support). TeXLive and other distributions all ship with modern TeX renderers (XeTeX, LuaTeX, ConTeXt).
– Konrad Rudolph
Feb 14 '12 at 17:27

4

@KonradRudolph: I wouldn't lump in ConTeXt with XeTeX and LuaTeX. ConTeXt is - like LaTeX - a macro package that sits on top of TeX while XeTeX and LuaTeX are implementations of TeX itself
– kahen
Feb 15 '12 at 3:41

|
show 12 more comments

up vote
39
down vote

Like egreg said earlier in his comment, use newcommand{textsharp}{$sharp$}

The hash symbol was used out of necessity since ASCII did not contain a sharp symbol, but it was intended as a sharp note symbol as the language name denotes.

Addendum: You could always use $^sharp$ for superscript.

enter image description here

edited Feb 16 '12 at 10:05

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:56

Ayman Elmasry

3,81993547

16

Yup! That’s why it’s called “C Sharp” and not “C Pound Sign” or “C Octothorpe”.
– Todd Lehman
Feb 16 '12 at 3:22

1

Both the C# language specification and the LaTeX paper on C# I'm citing (Variance and Generalized Constraints for C♯ Generics) use a superscript, and $^sharp$ is the closest I can get.
– Blaisorblade
Jun 6 '13 at 17:41

add a comment |

up vote
20
down vote

You might do with

documentclass{article}

usepackage{graphicx}

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  {settoheight{dimen0}{C}Ckern-.05em resizebox{!}{dimen0}{raisebox{depth}{#}}}}

begin{document}

HugeCsharp

end{document}

Here's the result; the second line has fontseries{b}selectfont#, but the strokes seem to be too heavy:

enter image description here

If you prefer to use the music sharp symbol, it might be

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  {settoheight{dimen0}{C}Ckern-.05em resizebox{!}{dimen0}{raisebox{depth}{$sharp$}}}}

enter image description here

edited Feb 14 '12 at 15:00

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:53

egreg

703k8618753154

1

When I try this, I find that I have to manually insert a space by typing , after Csharp. The result doesn't look quite right. Could you modify your MWE to use Csharp in the middle of a sentence?
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 3:00

2

@littleO Like every LaTeX command, it ”eats“ spaces after it. Use ”backslash space“ or {}
– egreg
Jun 28 '17 at 7:51

1

Oh ok, thank you. I actually didn't realize I could just use "backslash space" to make a smaller space than I get with ,. This answer was really useful to me!
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 7:55

add a comment |

up vote
5
down vote

Here’s a version using ooalign to combine an equal sign with two tightly kerned slashes. It works for all 10 standard sizes from tiny up to Huge.

examples

The Good

The line stroke widths are consistent and feel right (to me).

The Bad

As you can see from the code below, it’s rather a bit of a hack. I’m sure there are probably more elegant ways to do this. Perhaps someone can improve it and post a follow-up.

You may need to tweak the positioning parameters if you’re using non-CMR or non-LMR fonts.

The reason the implentation is so complicated is because the regular slash character is too tall for this, necessitating the use of a smaller sized slash in each case. Everything above footnotesize uses a smaller slash; the smallest three make do with their respective native slashes.

The Ugly

Because of calculation rounding issues, the display of this may not look quite right on screen; you may notice the // and the = appearing to be 1 pixel out of alignment in an on-screen PDF viewer at low dpi. It should be fine in print, however. This problem is common with many hand-composited symbols like this one.

Here’s the code with an (almost) MWE:

documentclass{article}



begin{document}



makeatletter

defCsharp@tiny{5}

defCsharp@scriptsize{7}

defCsharp@footnotesize{8}

defCsharp@small{9}

defCsharp@normalsize{10}

defCsharp@large{12}

defCsharp@Large{14.4}

defCsharp@LARGE{17.28}

defCsharp@huge{20.74}

defCsharp@Huge{24.88}

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  mbox{%

    C%

    ooalign{%

      noalign{%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@tinyvskip-1.11exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@scriptsizevskip-1.11exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@footnotesizevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@smallvskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@normalsizevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@largevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Largevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@LARGEvskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@hugevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Hugevskip-1.07exfi%

      }%

      hss{=}hsscr%

      noalign{%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@tinyvskip-0exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@scriptsizevskip-0exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@footnotesizevskip-0exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@smallvskip-.06exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@normalsizevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@largevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Largevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@LARGEvskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@hugevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Hugevskip-.10exfi%

      }%

      hss{%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@tinytinyfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@scriptsizescriptsizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@footnotesizefootnotesizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@smallfootnotesizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@normalsizefootnotesizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@largenormalsizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Largelargefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@LARGELargefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@hugeLARGEfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Hugehugefi%

        {/}kern-.26em{/}%

      }hsscr%

    }%

  }%

}

makeatother



emergencystretch=2em

narrowernarrowernarrowernarrowernarrowernarrowernarrower

noindentCsharp (pronounced ``see sharp'') is a multi-paradigm programming language

encompassing strong typing, imperative, declarative, functional, generic,

object-oriented (class-based), and component-oriented programming disciplines.

vskip 1em

noindenttinyCsharp,

scriptsizeCsharp,

footnotesizeCsharp,

smallCsharp,

normalsizeCsharpparvskip-.25em

noindentlargeCsharp,

LargeCsharp,

LARGECsharpparvskip-.25em

noindenthugeCsharp,

HugeCsharppar



end{document}

answered Feb 16 '12 at 4:44

Todd Lehman

9,69223450

4

Defining those sizes seems pointless. The LaTeX kernel defines them as: @vpt, @viipt, @viiipt, @ixpt, @xpt, @xiipt, @xivpt, @xviipt, @xxpt, @xvpt and I don't think anything ever modifies them (because that would be crazy)
– kahen
Feb 16 '12 at 10:12

add a comment |

up vote
4
down vote

Using TikZ it's possible to draw the desired symbol manually:

defCsharp{Ctikz[x=1em,y=baselineskip]%

  draw (0.125,0.15) -- ++(0.15,0.5)%

        (0.325,0.15) -- ++(0.15,0.5)%

        (0.05,0.3) -- ++(0.45,0.0)%

        (0.1,0.5) -- ++(0.45,0.0);}

This has some issues though. For example the symbol doesn't scale all that well with changing font size, but the difference between Large and normalsize isn't too bad. Additionally it's impossible to copy "C#" from the resulting PDF file into the clipboard which may or may not be an issue.

answered Feb 14 '12 at 15:28

kahen

1,70311521

1

Copying is somewhat possible: overlay the drawing on a zero-sized white #.
– Andrey Vihrov
Feb 14 '12 at 16:35

add a comment |

up vote
4
down vote

Building on the accepted answer and looking at the C# language specification (a .docx...) I came up with this:

newcommand{csharp}{Cnolinebreak[4]raisebox{.6ex}{includegraphics[scale=.8]{hash-symbol}}}

Which looks like this:

Note that when using LuaLaTex you'll need to add RequirePackage{luatex85} to the top of the file that you use for generating the PDF due to compatibility issues with the standalone document class. Also note that the Liberation fonts can be found here: https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/

MWE:

RequirePackage{luatex85}

documentclass[border=0pt]{standalone}

usepackage{fontspec}

begin{document}% I get extra space without this comment

fontspec{Liberation Serif}#

end{document}

edited Jun 29 '17 at 10:42

answered Jun 23 '16 at 16:48

theseion

1586

1

Where do I get the hash-symbol image? Can you give a MWE?
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 3:09

2

Added MWE. Run that through pdflatex and you should get the PDF. You can use PDF files as images, if that wasn't clear.
– theseion
Jun 29 '17 at 10:43

add a comment |

up vote
4
down vote

If you use XeTeX and your font supports it, you can put the Unicode character directly into your source file, or use symbol{"266F}. With fonts such as Linux Libertine, this looks much nicer than sharp, which seems to use raw TeX rather than looking for a proper sharp character:

Screenshot of different methods of rendering C# using XeTeX

edited Jun 29 '17 at 13:19

answered Mar 23 '14 at 8:45

sjy

28326

1

You can get a better-matched sharp symbol in Libertine if you add usepackage[libertine]{newtxmath} and then use $sharp$ .
– musarithmia
Jun 23 '16 at 17:11

add a comment |

up vote
3
down vote

For pfdtex I prefere:

documentclass{article}

usepackage{graphicx}

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  {settoheight{dimen0}{C}Ckern-.05em resizebox{!}{dimen0}{raisebox{depth}{textbf{#}}}}}

begin{document}

HugeCsharp

end{document}

Similar to the above but with thick #, because the thin one does not fit to the C in my eyes.

answered Jun 13 '12 at 9:00

Tarion

1514

add a comment |

up vote
0
down vote

Here, I take a # and, in superscript mode, make it the same vertical footprint as ig.

documentclass{article}

usepackage{scalerel}

newcommandmyhash{$^{scalerel*{#}{ig}}$}

begin{document}

Cmyhash

end{document}

enter image description here

The even simpler Cscalerel*{#}{X} typesets as

enter image description here

answered Jun 29 '17 at 13:10

Steven B. Segletes

152k9192399

add a comment |

up vote
0
down vote

You can try Cverb|#|, if this form suits your purpose.

answered 1 hour ago

Inc0gnito

New contributor

Welcome to TeX.SE! Please do not only show code, show also the result. BTW: best woulb be to show a compilable code ...
– Kurt
1 hour ago

add a comment |

up vote
-1
down vote

How about these?

defCSH{{Cnolinebreak[4]hspace{-.05em}raisebox{.4ex}{footnotesizebf #}}}

A direct variation of Prettiest way to typeset "C++" (cplusplus)?

edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36

Community♦

answered Jul 2 '16 at 22:31

Nestor Waldyd

10914

add a comment |

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});

}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44528%2fhow-to-make-the-correct-hash-symbol-in-c-sharp-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

11 Answers
11

active

oldest

votes

11 Answers
11

active

oldest

votes

up vote
22
down vote

accepted

Result

Unfortunately, as Liberation Serif is a TrueType font, it can't be readily used with pdfTeX. Below is the code to use it with XeTeX/LuaTeX.

documentclass{article}



usepackage{fontspec}



newfontfacelserif{Liberation Serif}



newcommand{Csh}{C{lserif#}}



begin{document}



Some text Csh{} some text.



end{document}

Workaround for pdfTeX

Process this file with XeTeX/LuaTeX and save the result as hash-symbol.pdf:

documentclass[border=0pt]{standalone}

usepackage{fontspec}

begin{document}% I get extra space without this comment

fontspec{Liberation Serif}#

end{document}

Then use this code to include the symbol with pdfTeX:

documentclass{article}



usepackage{graphicx}



newcommand{Csh}{Cincludegraphics{hash-symbol}}



begin{document}



Some text Csh{} some text.



end{document}

enter image description here

The positioning of the symbol might be slightly off, use kern and raisebox to fine-tune. Also note that this will only work for one font size; to remedy this, scalebox might be useful (manual).

edited Feb 15 '12 at 8:29

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:38

Andrey Vihrov

18.2k375101

1

It's a nice start, I need it to work with pdfText though, maybe someone else has some ideas on this too. Thanks!
– Filip Ekberg
Feb 14 '12 at 14:52

2

@Filip You might consider switching anyway. While pdfTeX has served well, I would say that we might soon start to call it obsolete. Modern TeX implementations are simply superior in so many regards.
– Konrad Rudolph
Feb 14 '12 at 15:30

1

@KonradRudolph, pdflatex was what came with texlive/texniccenter. You're saying I should upgrade to something else?
– Filip Ekberg
Feb 14 '12 at 17:09

1

@Filip TeXnicCenter is an editor (and a pretty crappy one at that, speak Unicode support). TeXLive and other distributions all ship with modern TeX renderers (XeTeX, LuaTeX, ConTeXt).
– Konrad Rudolph
Feb 14 '12 at 17:27

4

@KonradRudolph: I wouldn't lump in ConTeXt with XeTeX and LuaTeX. ConTeXt is - like LaTeX - a macro package that sits on top of TeX while XeTeX and LuaTeX are implementations of TeX itself
– kahen
Feb 15 '12 at 3:41

|
show 12 more comments

up vote
22
down vote

accepted

Result

Unfortunately, as Liberation Serif is a TrueType font, it can't be readily used with pdfTeX. Below is the code to use it with XeTeX/LuaTeX.

documentclass{article}



usepackage{fontspec}



newfontfacelserif{Liberation Serif}



newcommand{Csh}{C{lserif#}}



begin{document}



Some text Csh{} some text.



end{document}

Workaround for pdfTeX

Process this file with XeTeX/LuaTeX and save the result as hash-symbol.pdf:

documentclass[border=0pt]{standalone}

usepackage{fontspec}

begin{document}% I get extra space without this comment

fontspec{Liberation Serif}#

end{document}

Then use this code to include the symbol with pdfTeX:

documentclass{article}



usepackage{graphicx}



newcommand{Csh}{Cincludegraphics{hash-symbol}}



begin{document}



Some text Csh{} some text.



end{document}

enter image description here

The positioning of the symbol might be slightly off, use kern and raisebox to fine-tune. Also note that this will only work for one font size; to remedy this, scalebox might be useful (manual).

edited Feb 15 '12 at 8:29

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:38

Andrey Vihrov

18.2k375101

1

It's a nice start, I need it to work with pdfText though, maybe someone else has some ideas on this too. Thanks!
– Filip Ekberg
Feb 14 '12 at 14:52

2

@Filip You might consider switching anyway. While pdfTeX has served well, I would say that we might soon start to call it obsolete. Modern TeX implementations are simply superior in so many regards.
– Konrad Rudolph
Feb 14 '12 at 15:30

1

@KonradRudolph, pdflatex was what came with texlive/texniccenter. You're saying I should upgrade to something else?
– Filip Ekberg
Feb 14 '12 at 17:09

1

@Filip TeXnicCenter is an editor (and a pretty crappy one at that, speak Unicode support). TeXLive and other distributions all ship with modern TeX renderers (XeTeX, LuaTeX, ConTeXt).
– Konrad Rudolph
Feb 14 '12 at 17:27

4

@KonradRudolph: I wouldn't lump in ConTeXt with XeTeX and LuaTeX. ConTeXt is - like LaTeX - a macro package that sits on top of TeX while XeTeX and LuaTeX are implementations of TeX itself
– kahen
Feb 15 '12 at 3:41

|
show 12 more comments

up vote
22
down vote

accepted

Result

Unfortunately, as Liberation Serif is a TrueType font, it can't be readily used with pdfTeX. Below is the code to use it with XeTeX/LuaTeX.

documentclass{article}



usepackage{fontspec}



newfontfacelserif{Liberation Serif}



newcommand{Csh}{C{lserif#}}



begin{document}



Some text Csh{} some text.



end{document}

Workaround for pdfTeX

Process this file with XeTeX/LuaTeX and save the result as hash-symbol.pdf:

documentclass[border=0pt]{standalone}

usepackage{fontspec}

begin{document}% I get extra space without this comment

fontspec{Liberation Serif}#

end{document}

Then use this code to include the symbol with pdfTeX:

documentclass{article}



usepackage{graphicx}



newcommand{Csh}{Cincludegraphics{hash-symbol}}



begin{document}



Some text Csh{} some text.



end{document}

enter image description here

The positioning of the symbol might be slightly off, use kern and raisebox to fine-tune. Also note that this will only work for one font size; to remedy this, scalebox might be useful (manual).

edited Feb 15 '12 at 8:29

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:38

Andrey Vihrov

18.2k375101

Result

Unfortunately, as Liberation Serif is a TrueType font, it can't be readily used with pdfTeX. Below is the code to use it with XeTeX/LuaTeX.

documentclass{article}



usepackage{fontspec}



newfontfacelserif{Liberation Serif}



newcommand{Csh}{C{lserif#}}



begin{document}



Some text Csh{} some text.



end{document}

Workaround for pdfTeX

Process this file with XeTeX/LuaTeX and save the result as hash-symbol.pdf:

documentclass[border=0pt]{standalone}

usepackage{fontspec}

begin{document}% I get extra space without this comment

fontspec{Liberation Serif}#

end{document}

Then use this code to include the symbol with pdfTeX:

documentclass{article}



usepackage{graphicx}



newcommand{Csh}{Cincludegraphics{hash-symbol}}



begin{document}



Some text Csh{} some text.



end{document}

enter image description here

The positioning of the symbol might be slightly off, use kern and raisebox to fine-tune. Also note that this will only work for one font size; to remedy this, scalebox might be useful (manual).

edited Feb 15 '12 at 8:29

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:38

Andrey Vihrov

18.2k375101

edited Feb 15 '12 at 8:29

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:38

Andrey Vihrov

18.2k375101

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:38

Andrey Vihrov

18.2k375101

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:38

Andrey Vihrov

18.2k375101

1

It's a nice start, I need it to work with pdfText though, maybe someone else has some ideas on this too. Thanks!
– Filip Ekberg
Feb 14 '12 at 14:52

2

@Filip You might consider switching anyway. While pdfTeX has served well, I would say that we might soon start to call it obsolete. Modern TeX implementations are simply superior in so many regards.
– Konrad Rudolph
Feb 14 '12 at 15:30

1

@KonradRudolph, pdflatex was what came with texlive/texniccenter. You're saying I should upgrade to something else?
– Filip Ekberg
Feb 14 '12 at 17:09

1

@Filip TeXnicCenter is an editor (and a pretty crappy one at that, speak Unicode support). TeXLive and other distributions all ship with modern TeX renderers (XeTeX, LuaTeX, ConTeXt).
– Konrad Rudolph
Feb 14 '12 at 17:27

4

@KonradRudolph: I wouldn't lump in ConTeXt with XeTeX and LuaTeX. ConTeXt is - like LaTeX - a macro package that sits on top of TeX while XeTeX and LuaTeX are implementations of TeX itself
– kahen
Feb 15 '12 at 3:41

|
show 12 more comments

1

It's a nice start, I need it to work with pdfText though, maybe someone else has some ideas on this too. Thanks!
– Filip Ekberg
Feb 14 '12 at 14:52

2

@Filip You might consider switching anyway. While pdfTeX has served well, I would say that we might soon start to call it obsolete. Modern TeX implementations are simply superior in so many regards.
– Konrad Rudolph
Feb 14 '12 at 15:30

1

@KonradRudolph, pdflatex was what came with texlive/texniccenter. You're saying I should upgrade to something else?
– Filip Ekberg
Feb 14 '12 at 17:09

1

@Filip TeXnicCenter is an editor (and a pretty crappy one at that, speak Unicode support). TeXLive and other distributions all ship with modern TeX renderers (XeTeX, LuaTeX, ConTeXt).
– Konrad Rudolph
Feb 14 '12 at 17:27

4

@KonradRudolph: I wouldn't lump in ConTeXt with XeTeX and LuaTeX. ConTeXt is - like LaTeX - a macro package that sits on top of TeX while XeTeX and LuaTeX are implementations of TeX itself
– kahen
Feb 15 '12 at 3:41

It's a nice start, I need it to work with pdfText though, maybe someone else has some ideas on this too. Thanks!
– Filip Ekberg
Feb 14 '12 at 14:52

@Filip You might consider switching anyway. While pdfTeX has served well, I would say that we might soon start to call it obsolete. Modern TeX implementations are simply superior in so many regards.
– Konrad Rudolph
Feb 14 '12 at 15:30

@KonradRudolph, pdflatex was what came with texlive/texniccenter. You're saying I should upgrade to something else?
– Filip Ekberg
Feb 14 '12 at 17:09

@Filip TeXnicCenter is an editor (and a pretty crappy one at that, speak Unicode support). TeXLive and other distributions all ship with modern TeX renderers (XeTeX, LuaTeX, ConTeXt).
– Konrad Rudolph
Feb 14 '12 at 17:27

@KonradRudolph: I wouldn't lump in ConTeXt with XeTeX and LuaTeX. ConTeXt is - like LaTeX - a macro package that sits on top of TeX while XeTeX and LuaTeX are implementations of TeX itself
– kahen
Feb 15 '12 at 3:41

|
show 12 more comments

up vote
39
down vote

Like egreg said earlier in his comment, use newcommand{textsharp}{$sharp$}

The hash symbol was used out of necessity since ASCII did not contain a sharp symbol, but it was intended as a sharp note symbol as the language name denotes.

Addendum: You could always use $^sharp$ for superscript.

enter image description here

edited Feb 16 '12 at 10:05

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:56

Ayman Elmasry

3,81993547

16

Yup! That’s why it’s called “C Sharp” and not “C Pound Sign” or “C Octothorpe”.
– Todd Lehman
Feb 16 '12 at 3:22

1

Both the C# language specification and the LaTeX paper on C# I'm citing (Variance and Generalized Constraints for C♯ Generics) use a superscript, and $^sharp$ is the closest I can get.
– Blaisorblade
Jun 6 '13 at 17:41

add a comment |

up vote
39
down vote

Like egreg said earlier in his comment, use newcommand{textsharp}{$sharp$}

The hash symbol was used out of necessity since ASCII did not contain a sharp symbol, but it was intended as a sharp note symbol as the language name denotes.

Addendum: You could always use $^sharp$ for superscript.

enter image description here

edited Feb 16 '12 at 10:05

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:56

Ayman Elmasry

3,81993547

16

Yup! That’s why it’s called “C Sharp” and not “C Pound Sign” or “C Octothorpe”.
– Todd Lehman
Feb 16 '12 at 3:22

1

Both the C# language specification and the LaTeX paper on C# I'm citing (Variance and Generalized Constraints for C♯ Generics) use a superscript, and $^sharp$ is the closest I can get.
– Blaisorblade
Jun 6 '13 at 17:41

add a comment |

up vote
39
down vote

Like egreg said earlier in his comment, use newcommand{textsharp}{$sharp$}

The hash symbol was used out of necessity since ASCII did not contain a sharp symbol, but it was intended as a sharp note symbol as the language name denotes.

Addendum: You could always use $^sharp$ for superscript.

enter image description here

edited Feb 16 '12 at 10:05

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:56

Ayman Elmasry

3,81993547

Like egreg said earlier in his comment, use newcommand{textsharp}{$sharp$}

The hash symbol was used out of necessity since ASCII did not contain a sharp symbol, but it was intended as a sharp note symbol as the language name denotes.

Addendum: You could always use $^sharp$ for superscript.

enter image description here

edited Feb 16 '12 at 10:05

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:56

Ayman Elmasry

3,81993547

edited Feb 16 '12 at 10:05

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:56

Ayman Elmasry

3,81993547

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:56

Ayman Elmasry

3,81993547

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:56

Ayman Elmasry

3,81993547

16

Yup! That’s why it’s called “C Sharp” and not “C Pound Sign” or “C Octothorpe”.
– Todd Lehman
Feb 16 '12 at 3:22

1

Both the C# language specification and the LaTeX paper on C# I'm citing (Variance and Generalized Constraints for C♯ Generics) use a superscript, and $^sharp$ is the closest I can get.
– Blaisorblade
Jun 6 '13 at 17:41

add a comment |

16

Yup! That’s why it’s called “C Sharp” and not “C Pound Sign” or “C Octothorpe”.
– Todd Lehman
Feb 16 '12 at 3:22

1

Both the C# language specification and the LaTeX paper on C# I'm citing (Variance and Generalized Constraints for C♯ Generics) use a superscript, and $^sharp$ is the closest I can get.
– Blaisorblade
Jun 6 '13 at 17:41

Yup! That’s why it’s called “C Sharp” and not “C Pound Sign” or “C Octothorpe”.
– Todd Lehman
Feb 16 '12 at 3:22

Both the C# language specification and the LaTeX paper on C# I'm citing (Variance and Generalized Constraints for C♯ Generics) use a superscript, and $^sharp$ is the closest I can get.
– Blaisorblade
Jun 6 '13 at 17:41

add a comment |

up vote
20
down vote

You might do with

documentclass{article}

usepackage{graphicx}

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  {settoheight{dimen0}{C}Ckern-.05em resizebox{!}{dimen0}{raisebox{depth}{#}}}}

begin{document}

HugeCsharp

end{document}

Here's the result; the second line has fontseries{b}selectfont#, but the strokes seem to be too heavy:

enter image description here

If you prefer to use the music sharp symbol, it might be

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  {settoheight{dimen0}{C}Ckern-.05em resizebox{!}{dimen0}{raisebox{depth}{$sharp$}}}}

enter image description here

edited Feb 14 '12 at 15:00

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:53

egreg

703k8618753154

1

When I try this, I find that I have to manually insert a space by typing , after Csharp. The result doesn't look quite right. Could you modify your MWE to use Csharp in the middle of a sentence?
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 3:00

2

@littleO Like every LaTeX command, it ”eats“ spaces after it. Use ”backslash space“ or {}
– egreg
Jun 28 '17 at 7:51

1

Oh ok, thank you. I actually didn't realize I could just use "backslash space" to make a smaller space than I get with ,. This answer was really useful to me!
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 7:55

add a comment |

up vote
20
down vote

You might do with

documentclass{article}

usepackage{graphicx}

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  {settoheight{dimen0}{C}Ckern-.05em resizebox{!}{dimen0}{raisebox{depth}{#}}}}

begin{document}

HugeCsharp

end{document}

Here's the result; the second line has fontseries{b}selectfont#, but the strokes seem to be too heavy:

enter image description here

If you prefer to use the music sharp symbol, it might be

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  {settoheight{dimen0}{C}Ckern-.05em resizebox{!}{dimen0}{raisebox{depth}{$sharp$}}}}

enter image description here

edited Feb 14 '12 at 15:00

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:53

egreg

703k8618753154

1

When I try this, I find that I have to manually insert a space by typing , after Csharp. The result doesn't look quite right. Could you modify your MWE to use Csharp in the middle of a sentence?
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 3:00

2

@littleO Like every LaTeX command, it ”eats“ spaces after it. Use ”backslash space“ or {}
– egreg
Jun 28 '17 at 7:51

1

Oh ok, thank you. I actually didn't realize I could just use "backslash space" to make a smaller space than I get with ,. This answer was really useful to me!
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 7:55

add a comment |

up vote
20
down vote

You might do with

documentclass{article}

usepackage{graphicx}

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  {settoheight{dimen0}{C}Ckern-.05em resizebox{!}{dimen0}{raisebox{depth}{#}}}}

begin{document}

HugeCsharp

end{document}

Here's the result; the second line has fontseries{b}selectfont#, but the strokes seem to be too heavy:

enter image description here

If you prefer to use the music sharp symbol, it might be

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  {settoheight{dimen0}{C}Ckern-.05em resizebox{!}{dimen0}{raisebox{depth}{$sharp$}}}}

enter image description here

edited Feb 14 '12 at 15:00

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:53

egreg

703k8618753154

You might do with

documentclass{article}

usepackage{graphicx}

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  {settoheight{dimen0}{C}Ckern-.05em resizebox{!}{dimen0}{raisebox{depth}{#}}}}

begin{document}

HugeCsharp

end{document}

Here's the result; the second line has fontseries{b}selectfont#, but the strokes seem to be too heavy:

enter image description here

If you prefer to use the music sharp symbol, it might be

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  {settoheight{dimen0}{C}Ckern-.05em resizebox{!}{dimen0}{raisebox{depth}{$sharp$}}}}

enter image description here

edited Feb 14 '12 at 15:00

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:53

egreg

703k8618753154

edited Feb 14 '12 at 15:00

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:53

egreg

703k8618753154

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:53

egreg

703k8618753154

answered Feb 14 '12 at 14:53

egreg

703k8618753154

1

When I try this, I find that I have to manually insert a space by typing , after Csharp. The result doesn't look quite right. Could you modify your MWE to use Csharp in the middle of a sentence?
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 3:00

2

@littleO Like every LaTeX command, it ”eats“ spaces after it. Use ”backslash space“ or {}
– egreg
Jun 28 '17 at 7:51

1

Oh ok, thank you. I actually didn't realize I could just use "backslash space" to make a smaller space than I get with ,. This answer was really useful to me!
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 7:55

add a comment |

1

When I try this, I find that I have to manually insert a space by typing , after Csharp. The result doesn't look quite right. Could you modify your MWE to use Csharp in the middle of a sentence?
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 3:00

2

@littleO Like every LaTeX command, it ”eats“ spaces after it. Use ”backslash space“ or {}
– egreg
Jun 28 '17 at 7:51

1

Oh ok, thank you. I actually didn't realize I could just use "backslash space" to make a smaller space than I get with ,. This answer was really useful to me!
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 7:55

When I try this, I find that I have to manually insert a space by typing , after Csharp. The result doesn't look quite right. Could you modify your MWE to use Csharp in the middle of a sentence?
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 3:00

@littleO Like every LaTeX command, it ”eats“ spaces after it. Use ”backslash space“ or {}
– egreg
Jun 28 '17 at 7:51

Oh ok, thank you. I actually didn't realize I could just use "backslash space" to make a smaller space than I get with ,. This answer was really useful to me!
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 7:55

add a comment |

up vote
5
down vote

Here’s a version using ooalign to combine an equal sign with two tightly kerned slashes. It works for all 10 standard sizes from tiny up to Huge.

examples

The Good

The line stroke widths are consistent and feel right (to me).

The Bad

As you can see from the code below, it’s rather a bit of a hack. I’m sure there are probably more elegant ways to do this. Perhaps someone can improve it and post a follow-up.

You may need to tweak the positioning parameters if you’re using non-CMR or non-LMR fonts.

The reason the implentation is so complicated is because the regular slash character is too tall for this, necessitating the use of a smaller sized slash in each case. Everything above footnotesize uses a smaller slash; the smallest three make do with their respective native slashes.

The Ugly

Because of calculation rounding issues, the display of this may not look quite right on screen; you may notice the // and the = appearing to be 1 pixel out of alignment in an on-screen PDF viewer at low dpi. It should be fine in print, however. This problem is common with many hand-composited symbols like this one.

Here’s the code with an (almost) MWE:

documentclass{article}



begin{document}



makeatletter

defCsharp@tiny{5}

defCsharp@scriptsize{7}

defCsharp@footnotesize{8}

defCsharp@small{9}

defCsharp@normalsize{10}

defCsharp@large{12}

defCsharp@Large{14.4}

defCsharp@LARGE{17.28}

defCsharp@huge{20.74}

defCsharp@Huge{24.88}

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  mbox{%

    C%

    ooalign{%

      noalign{%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@tinyvskip-1.11exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@scriptsizevskip-1.11exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@footnotesizevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@smallvskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@normalsizevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@largevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Largevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@LARGEvskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@hugevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Hugevskip-1.07exfi%

      }%

      hss{=}hsscr%

      noalign{%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@tinyvskip-0exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@scriptsizevskip-0exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@footnotesizevskip-0exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@smallvskip-.06exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@normalsizevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@largevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Largevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@LARGEvskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@hugevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Hugevskip-.10exfi%

      }%

      hss{%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@tinytinyfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@scriptsizescriptsizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@footnotesizefootnotesizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@smallfootnotesizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@normalsizefootnotesizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@largenormalsizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Largelargefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@LARGELargefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@hugeLARGEfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Hugehugefi%

        {/}kern-.26em{/}%

      }hsscr%

    }%

  }%

}

makeatother



emergencystretch=2em

narrowernarrowernarrowernarrowernarrowernarrowernarrower

noindentCsharp (pronounced ``see sharp'') is a multi-paradigm programming language

encompassing strong typing, imperative, declarative, functional, generic,

object-oriented (class-based), and component-oriented programming disciplines.

vskip 1em

noindenttinyCsharp,

scriptsizeCsharp,

footnotesizeCsharp,

smallCsharp,

normalsizeCsharpparvskip-.25em

noindentlargeCsharp,

LargeCsharp,

LARGECsharpparvskip-.25em

noindenthugeCsharp,

HugeCsharppar



end{document}

answered Feb 16 '12 at 4:44

Todd Lehman

9,69223450

4

Defining those sizes seems pointless. The LaTeX kernel defines them as: @vpt, @viipt, @viiipt, @ixpt, @xpt, @xiipt, @xivpt, @xviipt, @xxpt, @xvpt and I don't think anything ever modifies them (because that would be crazy)
– kahen
Feb 16 '12 at 10:12

add a comment |

up vote
5
down vote

Here’s a version using ooalign to combine an equal sign with two tightly kerned slashes. It works for all 10 standard sizes from tiny up to Huge.

examples

The Good

The line stroke widths are consistent and feel right (to me).

The Bad

As you can see from the code below, it’s rather a bit of a hack. I’m sure there are probably more elegant ways to do this. Perhaps someone can improve it and post a follow-up.

You may need to tweak the positioning parameters if you’re using non-CMR or non-LMR fonts.

The reason the implentation is so complicated is because the regular slash character is too tall for this, necessitating the use of a smaller sized slash in each case. Everything above footnotesize uses a smaller slash; the smallest three make do with their respective native slashes.

The Ugly

Because of calculation rounding issues, the display of this may not look quite right on screen; you may notice the // and the = appearing to be 1 pixel out of alignment in an on-screen PDF viewer at low dpi. It should be fine in print, however. This problem is common with many hand-composited symbols like this one.

Here’s the code with an (almost) MWE:

documentclass{article}



begin{document}



makeatletter

defCsharp@tiny{5}

defCsharp@scriptsize{7}

defCsharp@footnotesize{8}

defCsharp@small{9}

defCsharp@normalsize{10}

defCsharp@large{12}

defCsharp@Large{14.4}

defCsharp@LARGE{17.28}

defCsharp@huge{20.74}

defCsharp@Huge{24.88}

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  mbox{%

    C%

    ooalign{%

      noalign{%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@tinyvskip-1.11exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@scriptsizevskip-1.11exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@footnotesizevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@smallvskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@normalsizevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@largevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Largevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@LARGEvskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@hugevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Hugevskip-1.07exfi%

      }%

      hss{=}hsscr%

      noalign{%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@tinyvskip-0exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@scriptsizevskip-0exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@footnotesizevskip-0exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@smallvskip-.06exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@normalsizevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@largevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Largevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@LARGEvskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@hugevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Hugevskip-.10exfi%

      }%

      hss{%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@tinytinyfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@scriptsizescriptsizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@footnotesizefootnotesizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@smallfootnotesizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@normalsizefootnotesizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@largenormalsizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Largelargefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@LARGELargefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@hugeLARGEfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Hugehugefi%

        {/}kern-.26em{/}%

      }hsscr%

    }%

  }%

}

makeatother



emergencystretch=2em

narrowernarrowernarrowernarrowernarrowernarrowernarrower

noindentCsharp (pronounced ``see sharp'') is a multi-paradigm programming language

encompassing strong typing, imperative, declarative, functional, generic,

object-oriented (class-based), and component-oriented programming disciplines.

vskip 1em

noindenttinyCsharp,

scriptsizeCsharp,

footnotesizeCsharp,

smallCsharp,

normalsizeCsharpparvskip-.25em

noindentlargeCsharp,

LargeCsharp,

LARGECsharpparvskip-.25em

noindenthugeCsharp,

HugeCsharppar



end{document}

answered Feb 16 '12 at 4:44

Todd Lehman

9,69223450

4

Defining those sizes seems pointless. The LaTeX kernel defines them as: @vpt, @viipt, @viiipt, @ixpt, @xpt, @xiipt, @xivpt, @xviipt, @xxpt, @xvpt and I don't think anything ever modifies them (because that would be crazy)
– kahen
Feb 16 '12 at 10:12

add a comment |

up vote
5
down vote

Here’s a version using ooalign to combine an equal sign with two tightly kerned slashes. It works for all 10 standard sizes from tiny up to Huge.

examples

The Good

The line stroke widths are consistent and feel right (to me).

The Bad

As you can see from the code below, it’s rather a bit of a hack. I’m sure there are probably more elegant ways to do this. Perhaps someone can improve it and post a follow-up.

You may need to tweak the positioning parameters if you’re using non-CMR or non-LMR fonts.

The reason the implentation is so complicated is because the regular slash character is too tall for this, necessitating the use of a smaller sized slash in each case. Everything above footnotesize uses a smaller slash; the smallest three make do with their respective native slashes.

The Ugly

Because of calculation rounding issues, the display of this may not look quite right on screen; you may notice the // and the = appearing to be 1 pixel out of alignment in an on-screen PDF viewer at low dpi. It should be fine in print, however. This problem is common with many hand-composited symbols like this one.

Here’s the code with an (almost) MWE:

documentclass{article}



begin{document}



makeatletter

defCsharp@tiny{5}

defCsharp@scriptsize{7}

defCsharp@footnotesize{8}

defCsharp@small{9}

defCsharp@normalsize{10}

defCsharp@large{12}

defCsharp@Large{14.4}

defCsharp@LARGE{17.28}

defCsharp@huge{20.74}

defCsharp@Huge{24.88}

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  mbox{%

    C%

    ooalign{%

      noalign{%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@tinyvskip-1.11exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@scriptsizevskip-1.11exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@footnotesizevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@smallvskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@normalsizevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@largevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Largevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@LARGEvskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@hugevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Hugevskip-1.07exfi%

      }%

      hss{=}hsscr%

      noalign{%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@tinyvskip-0exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@scriptsizevskip-0exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@footnotesizevskip-0exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@smallvskip-.06exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@normalsizevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@largevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Largevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@LARGEvskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@hugevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Hugevskip-.10exfi%

      }%

      hss{%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@tinytinyfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@scriptsizescriptsizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@footnotesizefootnotesizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@smallfootnotesizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@normalsizefootnotesizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@largenormalsizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Largelargefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@LARGELargefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@hugeLARGEfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Hugehugefi%

        {/}kern-.26em{/}%

      }hsscr%

    }%

  }%

}

makeatother



emergencystretch=2em

narrowernarrowernarrowernarrowernarrowernarrowernarrower

noindentCsharp (pronounced ``see sharp'') is a multi-paradigm programming language

encompassing strong typing, imperative, declarative, functional, generic,

object-oriented (class-based), and component-oriented programming disciplines.

vskip 1em

noindenttinyCsharp,

scriptsizeCsharp,

footnotesizeCsharp,

smallCsharp,

normalsizeCsharpparvskip-.25em

noindentlargeCsharp,

LargeCsharp,

LARGECsharpparvskip-.25em

noindenthugeCsharp,

HugeCsharppar



end{document}

answered Feb 16 '12 at 4:44

Todd Lehman

9,69223450

Here’s a version using ooalign to combine an equal sign with two tightly kerned slashes. It works for all 10 standard sizes from tiny up to Huge.

examples

The Good

The line stroke widths are consistent and feel right (to me).

The Bad

As you can see from the code below, it’s rather a bit of a hack. I’m sure there are probably more elegant ways to do this. Perhaps someone can improve it and post a follow-up.

You may need to tweak the positioning parameters if you’re using non-CMR or non-LMR fonts.

The reason the implentation is so complicated is because the regular slash character is too tall for this, necessitating the use of a smaller sized slash in each case. Everything above footnotesize uses a smaller slash; the smallest three make do with their respective native slashes.

The Ugly

Because of calculation rounding issues, the display of this may not look quite right on screen; you may notice the // and the = appearing to be 1 pixel out of alignment in an on-screen PDF viewer at low dpi. It should be fine in print, however. This problem is common with many hand-composited symbols like this one.

Here’s the code with an (almost) MWE:

documentclass{article}



begin{document}



makeatletter

defCsharp@tiny{5}

defCsharp@scriptsize{7}

defCsharp@footnotesize{8}

defCsharp@small{9}

defCsharp@normalsize{10}

defCsharp@large{12}

defCsharp@Large{14.4}

defCsharp@LARGE{17.28}

defCsharp@huge{20.74}

defCsharp@Huge{24.88}

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  mbox{%

    C%

    ooalign{%

      noalign{%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@tinyvskip-1.11exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@scriptsizevskip-1.11exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@footnotesizevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@smallvskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@normalsizevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@largevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Largevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@LARGEvskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@hugevskip-1.07exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Hugevskip-1.07exfi%

      }%

      hss{=}hsscr%

      noalign{%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@tinyvskip-0exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@scriptsizevskip-0exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@footnotesizevskip-0exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@smallvskip-.06exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@normalsizevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@largevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Largevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@LARGEvskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@hugevskip-.10exfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Hugevskip-.10exfi%

      }%

      hss{%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@tinytinyfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@scriptsizescriptsizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@footnotesizefootnotesizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@smallfootnotesizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@normalsizefootnotesizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@largenormalsizefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Largelargefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@LARGELargefi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@hugeLARGEfi%

        ifxf@sizeCsharp@Hugehugefi%

        {/}kern-.26em{/}%

      }hsscr%

    }%

  }%

}

makeatother



emergencystretch=2em

narrowernarrowernarrowernarrowernarrowernarrowernarrower

noindentCsharp (pronounced ``see sharp'') is a multi-paradigm programming language

encompassing strong typing, imperative, declarative, functional, generic,

object-oriented (class-based), and component-oriented programming disciplines.

vskip 1em

noindenttinyCsharp,

scriptsizeCsharp,

footnotesizeCsharp,

smallCsharp,

normalsizeCsharpparvskip-.25em

noindentlargeCsharp,

LargeCsharp,

LARGECsharpparvskip-.25em

noindenthugeCsharp,

HugeCsharppar



end{document}

answered Feb 16 '12 at 4:44

Todd Lehman

9,69223450

answered Feb 16 '12 at 4:44

Todd Lehman

9,69223450

answered Feb 16 '12 at 4:44

Todd Lehman

9,69223450

answered Feb 16 '12 at 4:44

Todd Lehman

9,69223450

4

Defining those sizes seems pointless. The LaTeX kernel defines them as: @vpt, @viipt, @viiipt, @ixpt, @xpt, @xiipt, @xivpt, @xviipt, @xxpt, @xvpt and I don't think anything ever modifies them (because that would be crazy)
– kahen
Feb 16 '12 at 10:12

add a comment |

4

Defining those sizes seems pointless. The LaTeX kernel defines them as: @vpt, @viipt, @viiipt, @ixpt, @xpt, @xiipt, @xivpt, @xviipt, @xxpt, @xvpt and I don't think anything ever modifies them (because that would be crazy)
– kahen
Feb 16 '12 at 10:12

Defining those sizes seems pointless. The LaTeX kernel defines them as: @vpt, @viipt, @viiipt, @ixpt, @xpt, @xiipt, @xivpt, @xviipt, @xxpt, @xvpt and I don't think anything ever modifies them (because that would be crazy)
– kahen
Feb 16 '12 at 10:12

add a comment |

up vote
4
down vote

Using TikZ it's possible to draw the desired symbol manually:

defCsharp{Ctikz[x=1em,y=baselineskip]%

  draw (0.125,0.15) -- ++(0.15,0.5)%

        (0.325,0.15) -- ++(0.15,0.5)%

        (0.05,0.3) -- ++(0.45,0.0)%

        (0.1,0.5) -- ++(0.45,0.0);}

answered Feb 14 '12 at 15:28

kahen

1,70311521

1

Copying is somewhat possible: overlay the drawing on a zero-sized white #.
– Andrey Vihrov
Feb 14 '12 at 16:35

add a comment |

up vote
4
down vote

Using TikZ it's possible to draw the desired symbol manually:

defCsharp{Ctikz[x=1em,y=baselineskip]%

  draw (0.125,0.15) -- ++(0.15,0.5)%

        (0.325,0.15) -- ++(0.15,0.5)%

        (0.05,0.3) -- ++(0.45,0.0)%

        (0.1,0.5) -- ++(0.45,0.0);}

answered Feb 14 '12 at 15:28

kahen

1,70311521

1

Copying is somewhat possible: overlay the drawing on a zero-sized white #.
– Andrey Vihrov
Feb 14 '12 at 16:35

add a comment |

up vote
4
down vote

Using TikZ it's possible to draw the desired symbol manually:

defCsharp{Ctikz[x=1em,y=baselineskip]%

  draw (0.125,0.15) -- ++(0.15,0.5)%

        (0.325,0.15) -- ++(0.15,0.5)%

        (0.05,0.3) -- ++(0.45,0.0)%

        (0.1,0.5) -- ++(0.45,0.0);}

answered Feb 14 '12 at 15:28

kahen

1,70311521

Using TikZ it's possible to draw the desired symbol manually:

defCsharp{Ctikz[x=1em,y=baselineskip]%

  draw (0.125,0.15) -- ++(0.15,0.5)%

        (0.325,0.15) -- ++(0.15,0.5)%

        (0.05,0.3) -- ++(0.45,0.0)%

        (0.1,0.5) -- ++(0.45,0.0);}

answered Feb 14 '12 at 15:28

kahen

1,70311521

answered Feb 14 '12 at 15:28

kahen

1,70311521

answered Feb 14 '12 at 15:28

kahen

1,70311521

answered Feb 14 '12 at 15:28

kahen

1,70311521

1

Copying is somewhat possible: overlay the drawing on a zero-sized white #.
– Andrey Vihrov
Feb 14 '12 at 16:35

add a comment |

1

Copying is somewhat possible: overlay the drawing on a zero-sized white #.
– Andrey Vihrov
Feb 14 '12 at 16:35

Copying is somewhat possible: overlay the drawing on a zero-sized white #.
– Andrey Vihrov
Feb 14 '12 at 16:35

add a comment |

up vote
4
down vote

Building on the accepted answer and looking at the C# language specification (a .docx...) I came up with this:

newcommand{csharp}{Cnolinebreak[4]raisebox{.6ex}{includegraphics[scale=.8]{hash-symbol}}}

Which looks like this:

MWE:

RequirePackage{luatex85}

documentclass[border=0pt]{standalone}

usepackage{fontspec}

begin{document}% I get extra space without this comment

fontspec{Liberation Serif}#

end{document}

edited Jun 29 '17 at 10:42

answered Jun 23 '16 at 16:48

theseion

1586

1

Where do I get the hash-symbol image? Can you give a MWE?
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 3:09

2

Added MWE. Run that through pdflatex and you should get the PDF. You can use PDF files as images, if that wasn't clear.
– theseion
Jun 29 '17 at 10:43

add a comment |

up vote
4
down vote

Building on the accepted answer and looking at the C# language specification (a .docx...) I came up with this:

newcommand{csharp}{Cnolinebreak[4]raisebox{.6ex}{includegraphics[scale=.8]{hash-symbol}}}

Which looks like this:

MWE:

RequirePackage{luatex85}

documentclass[border=0pt]{standalone}

usepackage{fontspec}

begin{document}% I get extra space without this comment

fontspec{Liberation Serif}#

end{document}

edited Jun 29 '17 at 10:42

answered Jun 23 '16 at 16:48

theseion

1586

1

Where do I get the hash-symbol image? Can you give a MWE?
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 3:09

2

Added MWE. Run that through pdflatex and you should get the PDF. You can use PDF files as images, if that wasn't clear.
– theseion
Jun 29 '17 at 10:43

add a comment |

up vote
4
down vote

Building on the accepted answer and looking at the C# language specification (a .docx...) I came up with this:

newcommand{csharp}{Cnolinebreak[4]raisebox{.6ex}{includegraphics[scale=.8]{hash-symbol}}}

Which looks like this:

MWE:

RequirePackage{luatex85}

documentclass[border=0pt]{standalone}

usepackage{fontspec}

begin{document}% I get extra space without this comment

fontspec{Liberation Serif}#

end{document}

edited Jun 29 '17 at 10:42

answered Jun 23 '16 at 16:48

theseion

1586

Building on the accepted answer and looking at the C# language specification (a .docx...) I came up with this:

newcommand{csharp}{Cnolinebreak[4]raisebox{.6ex}{includegraphics[scale=.8]{hash-symbol}}}

Which looks like this:

MWE:

RequirePackage{luatex85}

documentclass[border=0pt]{standalone}

usepackage{fontspec}

begin{document}% I get extra space without this comment

fontspec{Liberation Serif}#

end{document}

edited Jun 29 '17 at 10:42

answered Jun 23 '16 at 16:48

theseion

1586

edited Jun 29 '17 at 10:42

answered Jun 23 '16 at 16:48

theseion

1586

answered Jun 23 '16 at 16:48

theseion

1586

answered Jun 23 '16 at 16:48

theseion

1586

1

Where do I get the hash-symbol image? Can you give a MWE?
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 3:09

2

Added MWE. Run that through pdflatex and you should get the PDF. You can use PDF files as images, if that wasn't clear.
– theseion
Jun 29 '17 at 10:43

add a comment |

1

Where do I get the hash-symbol image? Can you give a MWE?
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 3:09

2

Added MWE. Run that through pdflatex and you should get the PDF. You can use PDF files as images, if that wasn't clear.
– theseion
Jun 29 '17 at 10:43

Where do I get the hash-symbol image? Can you give a MWE?
– littleO
Jun 28 '17 at 3:09

Added MWE. Run that through pdflatex and you should get the PDF. You can use PDF files as images, if that wasn't clear.
– theseion
Jun 29 '17 at 10:43

add a comment |

up vote
4
down vote

Screenshot of different methods of rendering C# using XeTeX

edited Jun 29 '17 at 13:19

answered Mar 23 '14 at 8:45

sjy

28326

1

You can get a better-matched sharp symbol in Libertine if you add usepackage[libertine]{newtxmath} and then use $sharp$ .
– musarithmia
Jun 23 '16 at 17:11

add a comment |

up vote
4
down vote

Screenshot of different methods of rendering C# using XeTeX

edited Jun 29 '17 at 13:19

answered Mar 23 '14 at 8:45

sjy

28326

1

You can get a better-matched sharp symbol in Libertine if you add usepackage[libertine]{newtxmath} and then use $sharp$ .
– musarithmia
Jun 23 '16 at 17:11

add a comment |

up vote
4
down vote

Screenshot of different methods of rendering C# using XeTeX

edited Jun 29 '17 at 13:19

answered Mar 23 '14 at 8:45

sjy

28326

Screenshot of different methods of rendering C# using XeTeX

edited Jun 29 '17 at 13:19

answered Mar 23 '14 at 8:45

sjy

28326

edited Jun 29 '17 at 13:19

answered Mar 23 '14 at 8:45

sjy

28326

answered Mar 23 '14 at 8:45

sjy

28326

answered Mar 23 '14 at 8:45

sjy

28326

1

You can get a better-matched sharp symbol in Libertine if you add usepackage[libertine]{newtxmath} and then use $sharp$ .
– musarithmia
Jun 23 '16 at 17:11

add a comment |

1

You can get a better-matched sharp symbol in Libertine if you add usepackage[libertine]{newtxmath} and then use $sharp$ .
– musarithmia
Jun 23 '16 at 17:11

You can get a better-matched sharp symbol in Libertine if you add usepackage[libertine]{newtxmath} and then use $sharp$ .
– musarithmia
Jun 23 '16 at 17:11

add a comment |

up vote
3
down vote

For pfdtex I prefere:

documentclass{article}

usepackage{graphicx}

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  {settoheight{dimen0}{C}Ckern-.05em resizebox{!}{dimen0}{raisebox{depth}{textbf{#}}}}}

begin{document}

HugeCsharp

end{document}

Similar to the above but with thick #, because the thin one does not fit to the C in my eyes.

answered Jun 13 '12 at 9:00

Tarion

1514

add a comment |

up vote
3
down vote

For pfdtex I prefere:

documentclass{article}

usepackage{graphicx}

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  {settoheight{dimen0}{C}Ckern-.05em resizebox{!}{dimen0}{raisebox{depth}{textbf{#}}}}}

begin{document}

HugeCsharp

end{document}

Similar to the above but with thick #, because the thin one does not fit to the C in my eyes.

answered Jun 13 '12 at 9:00

Tarion

1514

add a comment |

up vote
3
down vote

For pfdtex I prefere:

documentclass{article}

usepackage{graphicx}

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  {settoheight{dimen0}{C}Ckern-.05em resizebox{!}{dimen0}{raisebox{depth}{textbf{#}}}}}

begin{document}

HugeCsharp

end{document}

Similar to the above but with thick #, because the thin one does not fit to the C in my eyes.

answered Jun 13 '12 at 9:00

Tarion

1514

For pfdtex I prefere:

documentclass{article}

usepackage{graphicx}

newcommand{Csharp}{%

  {settoheight{dimen0}{C}Ckern-.05em resizebox{!}{dimen0}{raisebox{depth}{textbf{#}}}}}

begin{document}

HugeCsharp

end{document}

Similar to the above but with thick #, because the thin one does not fit to the C in my eyes.

answered Jun 13 '12 at 9:00

Tarion

1514

answered Jun 13 '12 at 9:00

Tarion

1514

answered Jun 13 '12 at 9:00

Tarion

1514

answered Jun 13 '12 at 9:00

Tarion

1514

add a comment |

up vote
0
down vote

Here, I take a # and, in superscript mode, make it the same vertical footprint as ig.

documentclass{article}

usepackage{scalerel}

newcommandmyhash{$^{scalerel*{#}{ig}}$}

begin{document}

Cmyhash

end{document}

enter image description here

The even simpler Cscalerel*{#}{X} typesets as

enter image description here

answered Jun 29 '17 at 13:10

Steven B. Segletes

152k9192399

add a comment |

up vote
0
down vote

Here, I take a # and, in superscript mode, make it the same vertical footprint as ig.

documentclass{article}

usepackage{scalerel}

newcommandmyhash{$^{scalerel*{#}{ig}}$}

begin{document}

Cmyhash

end{document}

enter image description here

The even simpler Cscalerel*{#}{X} typesets as

enter image description here

answered Jun 29 '17 at 13:10

Steven B. Segletes

152k9192399

add a comment |

up vote
0
down vote

Here, I take a # and, in superscript mode, make it the same vertical footprint as ig.

documentclass{article}

usepackage{scalerel}

newcommandmyhash{$^{scalerel*{#}{ig}}$}

begin{document}

Cmyhash

end{document}

enter image description here

The even simpler Cscalerel*{#}{X} typesets as

enter image description here

answered Jun 29 '17 at 13:10

Steven B. Segletes

152k9192399

Here, I take a # and, in superscript mode, make it the same vertical footprint as ig.

documentclass{article}

usepackage{scalerel}

newcommandmyhash{$^{scalerel*{#}{ig}}$}

begin{document}

Cmyhash

end{document}

enter image description here

The even simpler Cscalerel*{#}{X} typesets as

enter image description here

answered Jun 29 '17 at 13:10

Steven B. Segletes

152k9192399

answered Jun 29 '17 at 13:10

Steven B. Segletes

152k9192399

answered Jun 29 '17 at 13:10

Steven B. Segletes

152k9192399

answered Jun 29 '17 at 13:10

Steven B. Segletes

152k9192399

add a comment |

up vote
0
down vote

You can try Cverb|#|, if this form suits your purpose.

answered 1 hour ago

Inc0gnito

New contributor

Welcome to TeX.SE! Please do not only show code, show also the result. BTW: best woulb be to show a compilable code ...
– Kurt
1 hour ago

add a comment |

up vote
0
down vote

You can try Cverb|#|, if this form suits your purpose.

answered 1 hour ago

Inc0gnito

New contributor

Welcome to TeX.SE! Please do not only show code, show also the result. BTW: best woulb be to show a compilable code ...
– Kurt
1 hour ago

add a comment |

up vote
0
down vote

You can try Cverb|#|, if this form suits your purpose.

answered 1 hour ago

Inc0gnito

New contributor

You can try Cverb|#|, if this form suits your purpose.

answered 1 hour ago

Inc0gnito

New contributor

answered 1 hour ago

Inc0gnito

New contributor

answered 1 hour ago

Inc0gnito

answered 1 hour ago

Inc0gnito

New contributor

Inc0gnito is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

Welcome to TeX.SE! Please do not only show code, show also the result. BTW: best woulb be to show a compilable code ...
– Kurt
1 hour ago

add a comment |

Welcome to TeX.SE! Please do not only show code, show also the result. BTW: best woulb be to show a compilable code ...
– Kurt
1 hour ago

Welcome to TeX.SE! Please do not only show code, show also the result. BTW: best woulb be to show a compilable code ...
– Kurt
1 hour ago

add a comment |

up vote
-1
down vote

How about these?

defCSH{{Cnolinebreak[4]hspace{-.05em}raisebox{.4ex}{footnotesizebf #}}}

A direct variation of Prettiest way to typeset "C++" (cplusplus)?

edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36

Community♦

answered Jul 2 '16 at 22:31

Nestor Waldyd

10914

add a comment |

up vote
-1
down vote

How about these?

defCSH{{Cnolinebreak[4]hspace{-.05em}raisebox{.4ex}{footnotesizebf #}}}

A direct variation of Prettiest way to typeset "C++" (cplusplus)?

edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36

Community♦

answered Jul 2 '16 at 22:31

Nestor Waldyd

10914

add a comment |

up vote
-1
down vote

How about these?

defCSH{{Cnolinebreak[4]hspace{-.05em}raisebox{.4ex}{footnotesizebf #}}}

A direct variation of Prettiest way to typeset "C++" (cplusplus)?

edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36

Community♦

answered Jul 2 '16 at 22:31

Nestor Waldyd

10914

How about these?

defCSH{{Cnolinebreak[4]hspace{-.05em}raisebox{.4ex}{footnotesizebf #}}}

A direct variation of Prettiest way to typeset "C++" (cplusplus)?

edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36

Community♦

answered Jul 2 '16 at 22:31

Nestor Waldyd

10914

edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36

Community♦

edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36

Community♦

edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36

Community♦

answered Jul 2 '16 at 22:31

Nestor Waldyd

10914

answered Jul 2 '16 at 22:31

Nestor Waldyd

10914

answered Jul 2 '16 at 22:31

Nestor Waldyd

10914

add a comment |

draft saved

draft discarded

Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!

Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.

Please pay close attention to the following guidance:

Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here

搜尋此網誌

Sstrhsrtj