Unable to compile Linux Kernel 4.7-rc2
I was trying to compile Linux Kernel from source. I've compiled the kernel previously and never got any error. But this time I am facing an error. The error is
CHK include/generated/asm-offsets.h
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
HOSTCC scripts/sign-file
/tmp/cczyW3hq.o: In function `main':
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x52): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x5e): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x247): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
scripts/Makefile.host:91: recipe for target 'scripts/sign-file' failed
make[1]: [scripts/sign-file] Error 1
When I checked scripts/sign-file.c, I saw comment saying Sign a module file using the given key.. So I reran make menuconfig, and set Module signature verification off. And tried to compile again. Now, previous error was removed but new error showed up which was same as above but on different file. Here is the error,
CHK include/generated/asm-offsets.h
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
HOSTCC scripts/extract-cert
/tmp/ccA63AAC.o: In function `main':
extract-cert.c:(.text.startup+0x25): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
extract-cert.c:(.text.startup+0x31): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
scripts/Makefile.host:91: recipe for target 'scripts/extract-cert' failed
make[1]: *** [scripts/extract-cert] Error 1
Makefile:556: recipe for target 'scripts' failed
make: *** [scripts] Error 2
So I want to know whether this problem is with libssl or some configuration error? I am using Ubuntu 16.04LTS with gcc-5.3.1.
EDIT: I have tried reinstalling libssl-dev and also tried compiling openssl from source code and then installing too. I have copied config file from /boot/config-4.4.0-22-generic to source directory.
UPDATE:
with make scripts V=1 following is the output:
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic
rm -f .tmp_quiet_recordmcount
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.asm-generic
src=asm obj=arch/x86/include/generated/asm
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.asm-generic
src=uapi/asm obj=arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/gdb
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/gdb/linux
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/genksyms
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/mod
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/selinux
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/selinux/genheaders
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/selinux/mdp
gcc -Wp,-MD,scripts/.sign-file.d -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -std=gnu89 -I./tools/include -o scripts/sign-file scripts/sign-file.c -lcrypto
/tmp/cc7o2Y1C.o: In function `main':
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x52): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x5e): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x247): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
scripts/Makefile.host:91: recipe for target 'scripts/sign-file' failed
make[1]: *** [scripts/sign-file] Error 1
Makefile:556: recipe for target 'scripts' failed
make: *** [scripts] Error 2
linux kernel openssl
asked Jun 6 '16 at 10:19
0x00010x0001
1064
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 20 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
|
show 1 more comment
I was trying to compile Linux Kernel from source. I've compiled the kernel previously and never got any error. But this time I am facing an error. The error is
CHK include/generated/asm-offsets.h
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
HOSTCC scripts/sign-file
/tmp/cczyW3hq.o: In function `main':
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x52): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x5e): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x247): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
scripts/Makefile.host:91: recipe for target 'scripts/sign-file' failed
make[1]: [scripts/sign-file] Error 1
When I checked scripts/sign-file.c, I saw comment saying Sign a module file using the given key.. So I reran make menuconfig, and set Module signature verification off. And tried to compile again. Now, previous error was removed but new error showed up which was same as above but on different file. Here is the error,
CHK include/generated/asm-offsets.h
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
HOSTCC scripts/extract-cert
/tmp/ccA63AAC.o: In function `main':
extract-cert.c:(.text.startup+0x25): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
extract-cert.c:(.text.startup+0x31): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
scripts/Makefile.host:91: recipe for target 'scripts/extract-cert' failed
make[1]: *** [scripts/extract-cert] Error 1
Makefile:556: recipe for target 'scripts' failed
make: *** [scripts] Error 2
So I want to know whether this problem is with libssl or some configuration error? I am using Ubuntu 16.04LTS with gcc-5.3.1.
EDIT: I have tried reinstalling libssl-dev and also tried compiling openssl from source code and then installing too. I have copied config file from /boot/config-4.4.0-22-generic to source directory.
UPDATE:
with make scripts V=1 following is the output:
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic
rm -f .tmp_quiet_recordmcount
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.asm-generic
src=asm obj=arch/x86/include/generated/asm
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.asm-generic
src=uapi/asm obj=arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/gdb
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/gdb/linux
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/genksyms
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/mod
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/selinux
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/selinux/genheaders
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/selinux/mdp
gcc -Wp,-MD,scripts/.sign-file.d -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -std=gnu89 -I./tools/include -o scripts/sign-file scripts/sign-file.c -lcrypto
/tmp/cc7o2Y1C.o: In function `main':
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x52): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x5e): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x247): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
scripts/Makefile.host:91: recipe for target 'scripts/sign-file' failed
make[1]: *** [scripts/sign-file] Error 1
Makefile:556: recipe for target 'scripts' failed
make: *** [scripts] Error 2
linux kernel openssl
asked Jun 6 '16 at 10:19
0x00010x0001
1064
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 20 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Disable the secure boot option
– GAD3R
Jun 6 '16 at 11:00
@GAD3R It is disabled in the BIOS.
– 0x0001
Jun 6 '16 at 11:06
What doesmake scripts V=1say (from the top-level directory)?
– Stephen Kitt
Jun 6 '16 at 12:57
@StephenKitt I have updated my question?
– 0x0001
Jun 6 '16 at 13:08
Thanks, does it work better if you removelibcrypto*from/usr/local/lib(or wherever you installed your manually-built version)?
– Stephen Kitt
Jun 6 '16 at 13:17
|
show 1 more comment
I was trying to compile Linux Kernel from source. I've compiled the kernel previously and never got any error. But this time I am facing an error. The error is
CHK include/generated/asm-offsets.h
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
HOSTCC scripts/sign-file
/tmp/cczyW3hq.o: In function `main':
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x52): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x5e): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x247): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
scripts/Makefile.host:91: recipe for target 'scripts/sign-file' failed
make[1]: [scripts/sign-file] Error 1
When I checked scripts/sign-file.c, I saw comment saying Sign a module file using the given key.. So I reran make menuconfig, and set Module signature verification off. And tried to compile again. Now, previous error was removed but new error showed up which was same as above but on different file. Here is the error,
CHK include/generated/asm-offsets.h
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
HOSTCC scripts/extract-cert
/tmp/ccA63AAC.o: In function `main':
extract-cert.c:(.text.startup+0x25): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
extract-cert.c:(.text.startup+0x31): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
scripts/Makefile.host:91: recipe for target 'scripts/extract-cert' failed
make[1]: *** [scripts/extract-cert] Error 1
Makefile:556: recipe for target 'scripts' failed
make: *** [scripts] Error 2
So I want to know whether this problem is with libssl or some configuration error? I am using Ubuntu 16.04LTS with gcc-5.3.1.
EDIT: I have tried reinstalling libssl-dev and also tried compiling openssl from source code and then installing too. I have copied config file from /boot/config-4.4.0-22-generic to source directory.
UPDATE:
with make scripts V=1 following is the output:
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic
rm -f .tmp_quiet_recordmcount
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.asm-generic
src=asm obj=arch/x86/include/generated/asm
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.asm-generic
src=uapi/asm obj=arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/gdb
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/gdb/linux
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/genksyms
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/mod
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/selinux
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/selinux/genheaders
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/selinux/mdp
gcc -Wp,-MD,scripts/.sign-file.d -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -std=gnu89 -I./tools/include -o scripts/sign-file scripts/sign-file.c -lcrypto
/tmp/cc7o2Y1C.o: In function `main':
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x52): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x5e): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x247): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
scripts/Makefile.host:91: recipe for target 'scripts/sign-file' failed
make[1]: *** [scripts/sign-file] Error 1
Makefile:556: recipe for target 'scripts' failed
make: *** [scripts] Error 2
linux kernel openssl
asked Jun 6 '16 at 10:19
0x00010x0001
1064
I was trying to compile Linux Kernel from source. I've compiled the kernel previously and never got any error. But this time I am facing an error. The error is
CHK include/generated/asm-offsets.h
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
HOSTCC scripts/sign-file
/tmp/cczyW3hq.o: In function `main':
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x52): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x5e): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x247): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
scripts/Makefile.host:91: recipe for target 'scripts/sign-file' failed
make[1]: [scripts/sign-file] Error 1
When I checked scripts/sign-file.c, I saw comment saying Sign a module file using the given key.. So I reran make menuconfig, and set Module signature verification off. And tried to compile again. Now, previous error was removed but new error showed up which was same as above but on different file. Here is the error,
CHK include/generated/asm-offsets.h
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
HOSTCC scripts/extract-cert
/tmp/ccA63AAC.o: In function `main':
extract-cert.c:(.text.startup+0x25): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
extract-cert.c:(.text.startup+0x31): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
scripts/Makefile.host:91: recipe for target 'scripts/extract-cert' failed
make[1]: *** [scripts/extract-cert] Error 1
Makefile:556: recipe for target 'scripts' failed
make: *** [scripts] Error 2
So I want to know whether this problem is with libssl or some configuration error? I am using Ubuntu 16.04LTS with gcc-5.3.1.
EDIT: I have tried reinstalling libssl-dev and also tried compiling openssl from source code and then installing too. I have copied config file from /boot/config-4.4.0-22-generic to source directory.
UPDATE:
with make scripts V=1 following is the output:
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic
rm -f .tmp_quiet_recordmcount
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.asm-generic
src=asm obj=arch/x86/include/generated/asm
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.asm-generic
src=uapi/asm obj=arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/gdb
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/gdb/linux
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/genksyms
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/mod
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/selinux
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/selinux/genheaders
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/selinux/mdp
gcc -Wp,-MD,scripts/.sign-file.d -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -std=gnu89 -I./tools/include -o scripts/sign-file scripts/sign-file.c -lcrypto
/tmp/cc7o2Y1C.o: In function `main':
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x52): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x5e): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
sign-file.c:(.text.startup+0x247): undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_crypto'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
scripts/Makefile.host:91: recipe for target 'scripts/sign-file' failed
make[1]: *** [scripts/sign-file] Error 1
Makefile:556: recipe for target 'scripts' failed
make: *** [scripts] Error 2
linux kernel openssl
linux kernel openssl
asked Jun 6 '16 at 10:19
0x00010x0001
1064
asked Jun 6 '16 at 10:19
0x00010x0001
1064
edited Jun 6 '16 at 13:06
0x0001
asked Jun 6 '16 at 10:19
0x00010x0001
1064
asked Jun 6 '16 at 10:19
0x00010x0001
1064
asked Jun 6 '16 at 10:19
0x00010x0001
1064
1064
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 20 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 20 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Disable the secure boot option
– GAD3R
Jun 6 '16 at 11:00
@GAD3R It is disabled in the BIOS.
– 0x0001
Jun 6 '16 at 11:06
What doesmake scripts V=1say (from the top-level directory)?
– Stephen Kitt
Jun 6 '16 at 12:57
@StephenKitt I have updated my question?
– 0x0001
Jun 6 '16 at 13:08
Thanks, does it work better if you removelibcrypto*from/usr/local/lib(or wherever you installed your manually-built version)?
– Stephen Kitt
Jun 6 '16 at 13:17
|
show 1 more comment
Disable the secure boot option
– GAD3R
Jun 6 '16 at 11:00
@GAD3R It is disabled in the BIOS.
– 0x0001
Jun 6 '16 at 11:06
What doesmake scripts V=1say (from the top-level directory)?
– Stephen Kitt
Jun 6 '16 at 12:57
@StephenKitt I have updated my question?
– 0x0001
Jun 6 '16 at 13:08
Thanks, does it work better if you removelibcrypto*from/usr/local/lib(or wherever you installed your manually-built version)?
– Stephen Kitt
Jun 6 '16 at 13:17
Disable the secure boot option
– GAD3R
Jun 6 '16 at 11:00
Disable the secure boot option
– GAD3R
Jun 6 '16 at 11:00
@GAD3R It is disabled in the BIOS.
– 0x0001
Jun 6 '16 at 11:06
@GAD3R It is disabled in the BIOS.
– 0x0001
Jun 6 '16 at 11:06
What does
make scripts V=1 say (from the top-level directory)?– Stephen Kitt
Jun 6 '16 at 12:57
What does
make scripts V=1 say (from the top-level directory)?– Stephen Kitt
Jun 6 '16 at 12:57
@StephenKitt I have updated my question?
– 0x0001
Jun 6 '16 at 13:08
@StephenKitt I have updated my question?
– 0x0001
Jun 6 '16 at 13:08
Thanks, does it work better if you remove
libcrypto* from /usr/local/lib (or wherever you installed your manually-built version)?– Stephen Kitt
Jun 6 '16 at 13:17
Thanks, does it work better if you remove
libcrypto* from /usr/local/lib (or wherever you installed your manually-built version)?– Stephen Kitt
Jun 6 '16 at 13:17
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You will have to make sure that the symbolic link to libssl and libcrypto is updated.
Here is what you should do:
Search for all occurrences of libssl.so and libcrypto.so
for each of them, see of they are linking to the correct version of libssl.
libssl.so.1.1 in your case (libssl.so.1.1 must exist).
If they are targeting an older version, delete the link and create a new one
ln -s libssl.so.1.1 libssl.so
Same for libcrytpo.
Make sure you search for all occurances of libssl.so (you never know where your code picks it up from)
answered Nov 2 '17 at 20:18
Sabih ZafarullahSabih Zafarullah
1
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f287930%2funable-to-compile-linux-kernel-4-7-rc2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You will have to make sure that the symbolic link to libssl and libcrypto is updated.
Here is what you should do:
Search for all occurrences of libssl.so and libcrypto.so
for each of them, see of they are linking to the correct version of libssl.
libssl.so.1.1 in your case (libssl.so.1.1 must exist).
If they are targeting an older version, delete the link and create a new one
ln -s libssl.so.1.1 libssl.so
Same for libcrytpo.
Make sure you search for all occurances of libssl.so (you never know where your code picks it up from)
answered Nov 2 '17 at 20:18
Sabih ZafarullahSabih Zafarullah
1
add a comment |
You will have to make sure that the symbolic link to libssl and libcrypto is updated.
Here is what you should do:
Search for all occurrences of libssl.so and libcrypto.so
for each of them, see of they are linking to the correct version of libssl.
libssl.so.1.1 in your case (libssl.so.1.1 must exist).
If they are targeting an older version, delete the link and create a new one
ln -s libssl.so.1.1 libssl.so
Same for libcrytpo.
Make sure you search for all occurances of libssl.so (you never know where your code picks it up from)
answered Nov 2 '17 at 20:18
Sabih ZafarullahSabih Zafarullah
1
add a comment |
You will have to make sure that the symbolic link to libssl and libcrypto is updated.
Here is what you should do:
Search for all occurrences of libssl.so and libcrypto.so
for each of them, see of they are linking to the correct version of libssl.
libssl.so.1.1 in your case (libssl.so.1.1 must exist).
If they are targeting an older version, delete the link and create a new one
ln -s libssl.so.1.1 libssl.so
Same for libcrytpo.
Make sure you search for all occurances of libssl.so (you never know where your code picks it up from)
answered Nov 2 '17 at 20:18
Sabih ZafarullahSabih Zafarullah
1
You will have to make sure that the symbolic link to libssl and libcrypto is updated.
Here is what you should do:
Search for all occurrences of libssl.so and libcrypto.so
for each of them, see of they are linking to the correct version of libssl.
libssl.so.1.1 in your case (libssl.so.1.1 must exist).
If they are targeting an older version, delete the link and create a new one
ln -s libssl.so.1.1 libssl.so
Same for libcrytpo.
Make sure you search for all occurances of libssl.so (you never know where your code picks it up from)
answered Nov 2 '17 at 20:18
Sabih ZafarullahSabih Zafarullah
1
answered Nov 2 '17 at 20:18
Sabih ZafarullahSabih Zafarullah
1
answered Nov 2 '17 at 20:18
Sabih ZafarullahSabih Zafarullah
1
answered Nov 2 '17 at 20:18
Sabih ZafarullahSabih Zafarullah
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f287930%2funable-to-compile-linux-kernel-4-7-rc2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Disable the secure boot option
– GAD3R
Jun 6 '16 at 11:00
@GAD3R It is disabled in the BIOS.
– 0x0001
Jun 6 '16 at 11:06
What does
make scripts V=1say (from the top-level directory)?– Stephen Kitt
Jun 6 '16 at 12:57
@StephenKitt I have updated my question?
– 0x0001
Jun 6 '16 at 13:08
Thanks, does it work better if you remove
libcrypto*from/usr/local/lib(or wherever you installed your manually-built version)?– Stephen Kitt
Jun 6 '16 at 13:17