Why do I keep getting this incorrect solution for this polynomial problem?












1














The problem is to find all real solutions (if any exists) for $sqrt{2x-3} +x=3$.



Now, my textbook says the answer is {2}, however, I keep getting {2, 6}. I've tried multiple approaches, but here is one of them:



I got rid of the root by squaring both sides,
$$sqrt{2x-3}^2=(3-x)^2$$
$$0=12-8x+x^2$$
Using the AC method, I got
$$(-x^2+6x)(2x-12)=0$$
$$-x(x-6)2(x-6)=0$$
$$(-x+2)(x-6)=0$$
hence, $$x=2, x=6$$



Of course, I can always just check my solutions and I'd immediately recognize 6 does not work. But that's a bit too tedious for my taste. Can anyone explain where I went wrong with my approach?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Small typo: $sqrt{2x-2}^2$ should read $sqrt{2x-3}^2$.
    – T. Ford
    38 mins ago
















1














The problem is to find all real solutions (if any exists) for $sqrt{2x-3} +x=3$.



Now, my textbook says the answer is {2}, however, I keep getting {2, 6}. I've tried multiple approaches, but here is one of them:



I got rid of the root by squaring both sides,
$$sqrt{2x-3}^2=(3-x)^2$$
$$0=12-8x+x^2$$
Using the AC method, I got
$$(-x^2+6x)(2x-12)=0$$
$$-x(x-6)2(x-6)=0$$
$$(-x+2)(x-6)=0$$
hence, $$x=2, x=6$$



Of course, I can always just check my solutions and I'd immediately recognize 6 does not work. But that's a bit too tedious for my taste. Can anyone explain where I went wrong with my approach?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Small typo: $sqrt{2x-2}^2$ should read $sqrt{2x-3}^2$.
    – T. Ford
    38 mins ago














1












1








1







The problem is to find all real solutions (if any exists) for $sqrt{2x-3} +x=3$.



Now, my textbook says the answer is {2}, however, I keep getting {2, 6}. I've tried multiple approaches, but here is one of them:



I got rid of the root by squaring both sides,
$$sqrt{2x-3}^2=(3-x)^2$$
$$0=12-8x+x^2$$
Using the AC method, I got
$$(-x^2+6x)(2x-12)=0$$
$$-x(x-6)2(x-6)=0$$
$$(-x+2)(x-6)=0$$
hence, $$x=2, x=6$$



Of course, I can always just check my solutions and I'd immediately recognize 6 does not work. But that's a bit too tedious for my taste. Can anyone explain where I went wrong with my approach?










share|cite|improve this question















The problem is to find all real solutions (if any exists) for $sqrt{2x-3} +x=3$.



Now, my textbook says the answer is {2}, however, I keep getting {2, 6}. I've tried multiple approaches, but here is one of them:



I got rid of the root by squaring both sides,
$$sqrt{2x-3}^2=(3-x)^2$$
$$0=12-8x+x^2$$
Using the AC method, I got
$$(-x^2+6x)(2x-12)=0$$
$$-x(x-6)2(x-6)=0$$
$$(-x+2)(x-6)=0$$
hence, $$x=2, x=6$$



Of course, I can always just check my solutions and I'd immediately recognize 6 does not work. But that's a bit too tedious for my taste. Can anyone explain where I went wrong with my approach?







algebra-precalculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 11 secs ago

























asked 45 mins ago









Lex_i

496




496








  • 1




    Small typo: $sqrt{2x-2}^2$ should read $sqrt{2x-3}^2$.
    – T. Ford
    38 mins ago














  • 1




    Small typo: $sqrt{2x-2}^2$ should read $sqrt{2x-3}^2$.
    – T. Ford
    38 mins ago








1




1




Small typo: $sqrt{2x-2}^2$ should read $sqrt{2x-3}^2$.
– T. Ford
38 mins ago




Small typo: $sqrt{2x-2}^2$ should read $sqrt{2x-3}^2$.
– T. Ford
38 mins ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















3














Because squaring both sides of an equation always introduces the “risk” of an extraneous solution.



As a very simple example, notice the following two equations:



$$x = sqrt 4 iff x = +2$$



$$x^2 = 4 iff vert xvert = 2 iff x = pm 2$$



The first equation has only one solution: $+sqrt 4$. The second, however, has two solutions: $pmsqrt 4$. And you get the second equation by squaring the first one.



The exact same idea applies to your example. You have



$$sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



which refers only to the non-negative square root of $2x-3$. So, if a solution makes the LHS negative, it is extraneous. But, when you square both sides, you’re actually solving



$$0 = 12-8x+x^2 iff color{blue}{pm}sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



which has a $pm$ sign and is therefore not the same equation. Now, to be precise, you’d have to add the condition that the LHS must be non-negative:



$$2x-3 = 9-6x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



$$0 = 12-8x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



Now, your equation is equivalent to the first with the given constraint. If you get any solution greater than $3$, (in this case, $6$), you’d know it satisfies the new equation but not the original one.






share|cite|improve this answer































    7














    When we square both sides, we could have introduce additional solution.



    An extreme example is as follows:



    Solve $x=1$.



    The solution is just $x=1$.



    However, if we square them, $x^2=1$. Now $x=-1$ also satisfies the new equation which is no longer the original problem.



    Remark: Note that as we write $$sqrt{2x-3}=3-x,$$



    there is an implicit constraint that we need $3-x ge 0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer





























      1














      Squaring both sides of an equation can introduce extraneous solutions. Thus it is necessary when doing so to check your answer.



      Notice:$$sqrt{2cdot 6-3}+6=9neq3$$.






      share|cite|improve this answer





























        0














        The initial question is actually:



        If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $sqrt{2x-3}+x=3$. What is $x$?



        With each algebraic step, if-then logic is used to rephrase the initial question, eventually leading to:



        If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $x in {2, 6}$. What is $x$?



        If all the logical steps are reversible, then we are done. We could 'let $x = 2$ or $x = 6$' and follow the logic backwards to demonstrate that x is a solution to the original equation. Unfortunately, as noted on other answers, squaring is not a reversible step; the inverse of the square root function is not the same as the square function. We can see this by noting that the square function takes positive and negative numbers and maps them to positive numbers. Meanwhile, the square root function takes positive numbers only and maps them to positive numbers only.



        All this is a long way of saying that the alternative to checking answers is understanding which algebraic steps are reversible and which are not. In practice, this is much harder than just checking every answer.






        share|cite





















          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055574%2fwhy-do-i-keep-getting-this-incorrect-solution-for-this-polynomial-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes








          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          Because squaring both sides of an equation always introduces the “risk” of an extraneous solution.



          As a very simple example, notice the following two equations:



          $$x = sqrt 4 iff x = +2$$



          $$x^2 = 4 iff vert xvert = 2 iff x = pm 2$$



          The first equation has only one solution: $+sqrt 4$. The second, however, has two solutions: $pmsqrt 4$. And you get the second equation by squaring the first one.



          The exact same idea applies to your example. You have



          $$sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



          which refers only to the non-negative square root of $2x-3$. So, if a solution makes the LHS negative, it is extraneous. But, when you square both sides, you’re actually solving



          $$0 = 12-8x+x^2 iff color{blue}{pm}sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



          which has a $pm$ sign and is therefore not the same equation. Now, to be precise, you’d have to add the condition that the LHS must be non-negative:



          $$2x-3 = 9-6x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



          $$0 = 12-8x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



          Now, your equation is equivalent to the first with the given constraint. If you get any solution greater than $3$, (in this case, $6$), you’d know it satisfies the new equation but not the original one.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            3














            Because squaring both sides of an equation always introduces the “risk” of an extraneous solution.



            As a very simple example, notice the following two equations:



            $$x = sqrt 4 iff x = +2$$



            $$x^2 = 4 iff vert xvert = 2 iff x = pm 2$$



            The first equation has only one solution: $+sqrt 4$. The second, however, has two solutions: $pmsqrt 4$. And you get the second equation by squaring the first one.



            The exact same idea applies to your example. You have



            $$sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



            which refers only to the non-negative square root of $2x-3$. So, if a solution makes the LHS negative, it is extraneous. But, when you square both sides, you’re actually solving



            $$0 = 12-8x+x^2 iff color{blue}{pm}sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



            which has a $pm$ sign and is therefore not the same equation. Now, to be precise, you’d have to add the condition that the LHS must be non-negative:



            $$2x-3 = 9-6x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



            $$0 = 12-8x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



            Now, your equation is equivalent to the first with the given constraint. If you get any solution greater than $3$, (in this case, $6$), you’d know it satisfies the new equation but not the original one.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              3












              3








              3






              Because squaring both sides of an equation always introduces the “risk” of an extraneous solution.



              As a very simple example, notice the following two equations:



              $$x = sqrt 4 iff x = +2$$



              $$x^2 = 4 iff vert xvert = 2 iff x = pm 2$$



              The first equation has only one solution: $+sqrt 4$. The second, however, has two solutions: $pmsqrt 4$. And you get the second equation by squaring the first one.



              The exact same idea applies to your example. You have



              $$sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



              which refers only to the non-negative square root of $2x-3$. So, if a solution makes the LHS negative, it is extraneous. But, when you square both sides, you’re actually solving



              $$0 = 12-8x+x^2 iff color{blue}{pm}sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



              which has a $pm$ sign and is therefore not the same equation. Now, to be precise, you’d have to add the condition that the LHS must be non-negative:



              $$2x-3 = 9-6x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



              $$0 = 12-8x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



              Now, your equation is equivalent to the first with the given constraint. If you get any solution greater than $3$, (in this case, $6$), you’d know it satisfies the new equation but not the original one.






              share|cite|improve this answer














              Because squaring both sides of an equation always introduces the “risk” of an extraneous solution.



              As a very simple example, notice the following two equations:



              $$x = sqrt 4 iff x = +2$$



              $$x^2 = 4 iff vert xvert = 2 iff x = pm 2$$



              The first equation has only one solution: $+sqrt 4$. The second, however, has two solutions: $pmsqrt 4$. And you get the second equation by squaring the first one.



              The exact same idea applies to your example. You have



              $$sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



              which refers only to the non-negative square root of $2x-3$. So, if a solution makes the LHS negative, it is extraneous. But, when you square both sides, you’re actually solving



              $$0 = 12-8x+x^2 iff color{blue}{pm}sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



              which has a $pm$ sign and is therefore not the same equation. Now, to be precise, you’d have to add the condition that the LHS must be non-negative:



              $$2x-3 = 9-6x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



              $$0 = 12-8x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



              Now, your equation is equivalent to the first with the given constraint. If you get any solution greater than $3$, (in this case, $6$), you’d know it satisfies the new equation but not the original one.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited 15 mins ago

























              answered 28 mins ago









              KM101

              4,573418




              4,573418























                  7














                  When we square both sides, we could have introduce additional solution.



                  An extreme example is as follows:



                  Solve $x=1$.



                  The solution is just $x=1$.



                  However, if we square them, $x^2=1$. Now $x=-1$ also satisfies the new equation which is no longer the original problem.



                  Remark: Note that as we write $$sqrt{2x-3}=3-x,$$



                  there is an implicit constraint that we need $3-x ge 0$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer


























                    7














                    When we square both sides, we could have introduce additional solution.



                    An extreme example is as follows:



                    Solve $x=1$.



                    The solution is just $x=1$.



                    However, if we square them, $x^2=1$. Now $x=-1$ also satisfies the new equation which is no longer the original problem.



                    Remark: Note that as we write $$sqrt{2x-3}=3-x,$$



                    there is an implicit constraint that we need $3-x ge 0$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer
























                      7












                      7








                      7






                      When we square both sides, we could have introduce additional solution.



                      An extreme example is as follows:



                      Solve $x=1$.



                      The solution is just $x=1$.



                      However, if we square them, $x^2=1$. Now $x=-1$ also satisfies the new equation which is no longer the original problem.



                      Remark: Note that as we write $$sqrt{2x-3}=3-x,$$



                      there is an implicit constraint that we need $3-x ge 0$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      When we square both sides, we could have introduce additional solution.



                      An extreme example is as follows:



                      Solve $x=1$.



                      The solution is just $x=1$.



                      However, if we square them, $x^2=1$. Now $x=-1$ also satisfies the new equation which is no longer the original problem.



                      Remark: Note that as we write $$sqrt{2x-3}=3-x,$$



                      there is an implicit constraint that we need $3-x ge 0$.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered 41 mins ago









                      Siong Thye Goh

                      99k1464116




                      99k1464116























                          1














                          Squaring both sides of an equation can introduce extraneous solutions. Thus it is necessary when doing so to check your answer.



                          Notice:$$sqrt{2cdot 6-3}+6=9neq3$$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer


























                            1














                            Squaring both sides of an equation can introduce extraneous solutions. Thus it is necessary when doing so to check your answer.



                            Notice:$$sqrt{2cdot 6-3}+6=9neq3$$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer
























                              1












                              1








                              1






                              Squaring both sides of an equation can introduce extraneous solutions. Thus it is necessary when doing so to check your answer.



                              Notice:$$sqrt{2cdot 6-3}+6=9neq3$$.






                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              Squaring both sides of an equation can introduce extraneous solutions. Thus it is necessary when doing so to check your answer.



                              Notice:$$sqrt{2cdot 6-3}+6=9neq3$$.







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered 33 mins ago









                              Chris Custer

                              10.8k3724




                              10.8k3724























                                  0














                                  The initial question is actually:



                                  If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $sqrt{2x-3}+x=3$. What is $x$?



                                  With each algebraic step, if-then logic is used to rephrase the initial question, eventually leading to:



                                  If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $x in {2, 6}$. What is $x$?



                                  If all the logical steps are reversible, then we are done. We could 'let $x = 2$ or $x = 6$' and follow the logic backwards to demonstrate that x is a solution to the original equation. Unfortunately, as noted on other answers, squaring is not a reversible step; the inverse of the square root function is not the same as the square function. We can see this by noting that the square function takes positive and negative numbers and maps them to positive numbers. Meanwhile, the square root function takes positive numbers only and maps them to positive numbers only.



                                  All this is a long way of saying that the alternative to checking answers is understanding which algebraic steps are reversible and which are not. In practice, this is much harder than just checking every answer.






                                  share|cite


























                                    0














                                    The initial question is actually:



                                    If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $sqrt{2x-3}+x=3$. What is $x$?



                                    With each algebraic step, if-then logic is used to rephrase the initial question, eventually leading to:



                                    If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $x in {2, 6}$. What is $x$?



                                    If all the logical steps are reversible, then we are done. We could 'let $x = 2$ or $x = 6$' and follow the logic backwards to demonstrate that x is a solution to the original equation. Unfortunately, as noted on other answers, squaring is not a reversible step; the inverse of the square root function is not the same as the square function. We can see this by noting that the square function takes positive and negative numbers and maps them to positive numbers. Meanwhile, the square root function takes positive numbers only and maps them to positive numbers only.



                                    All this is a long way of saying that the alternative to checking answers is understanding which algebraic steps are reversible and which are not. In practice, this is much harder than just checking every answer.






                                    share|cite
























                                      0












                                      0








                                      0






                                      The initial question is actually:



                                      If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $sqrt{2x-3}+x=3$. What is $x$?



                                      With each algebraic step, if-then logic is used to rephrase the initial question, eventually leading to:



                                      If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $x in {2, 6}$. What is $x$?



                                      If all the logical steps are reversible, then we are done. We could 'let $x = 2$ or $x = 6$' and follow the logic backwards to demonstrate that x is a solution to the original equation. Unfortunately, as noted on other answers, squaring is not a reversible step; the inverse of the square root function is not the same as the square function. We can see this by noting that the square function takes positive and negative numbers and maps them to positive numbers. Meanwhile, the square root function takes positive numbers only and maps them to positive numbers only.



                                      All this is a long way of saying that the alternative to checking answers is understanding which algebraic steps are reversible and which are not. In practice, this is much harder than just checking every answer.






                                      share|cite












                                      The initial question is actually:



                                      If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $sqrt{2x-3}+x=3$. What is $x$?



                                      With each algebraic step, if-then logic is used to rephrase the initial question, eventually leading to:



                                      If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $x in {2, 6}$. What is $x$?



                                      If all the logical steps are reversible, then we are done. We could 'let $x = 2$ or $x = 6$' and follow the logic backwards to demonstrate that x is a solution to the original equation. Unfortunately, as noted on other answers, squaring is not a reversible step; the inverse of the square root function is not the same as the square function. We can see this by noting that the square function takes positive and negative numbers and maps them to positive numbers. Meanwhile, the square root function takes positive numbers only and maps them to positive numbers only.



                                      All this is a long way of saying that the alternative to checking answers is understanding which algebraic steps are reversible and which are not. In practice, this is much harder than just checking every answer.







                                      share|cite












                                      share|cite



                                      share|cite










                                      answered 7 mins ago









                                      David Diaz

                                      933420




                                      933420






























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded




















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055574%2fwhy-do-i-keep-getting-this-incorrect-solution-for-this-polynomial-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          サソリ

                                          広島県道265号伴広島線

                                          Setup Asymptote in Texstudio