PTIJ: Why do we make a Lulav holder?












4















The Gemara says:




אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות



One does not make mitzvot into bundles.




But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.



ואם תומר, and if you'll say:



The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.



You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.



Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.



enter image description here



That should definitely be an issue.





This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.










share|improve this question























  • VTC as not Purim Torah

    – Double AA
    6 hours ago











  • @DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

    – Leitz
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

    – Double AA
    6 hours ago













  • Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

    – Dr. Shmuel
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

    – DonielF
    5 hours ago
















4















The Gemara says:




אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות



One does not make mitzvot into bundles.




But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.



ואם תומר, and if you'll say:



The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.



You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.



Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.



enter image description here



That should definitely be an issue.





This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.










share|improve this question























  • VTC as not Purim Torah

    – Double AA
    6 hours ago











  • @DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

    – Leitz
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

    – Double AA
    6 hours ago













  • Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

    – Dr. Shmuel
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

    – DonielF
    5 hours ago














4












4








4








The Gemara says:




אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות



One does not make mitzvot into bundles.




But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.



ואם תומר, and if you'll say:



The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.



You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.



Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.



enter image description here



That should definitely be an issue.





This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.










share|improve this question














The Gemara says:




אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות



One does not make mitzvot into bundles.




But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.



ואם תומר, and if you'll say:



The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.



You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.



Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.



enter image description here



That should definitely be an issue.





This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.







purim-torah-in-jest






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 6 hours ago









LeitzLeitz

903212




903212













  • VTC as not Purim Torah

    – Double AA
    6 hours ago











  • @DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

    – Leitz
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

    – Double AA
    6 hours ago













  • Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

    – Dr. Shmuel
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

    – DonielF
    5 hours ago



















  • VTC as not Purim Torah

    – Double AA
    6 hours ago











  • @DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

    – Leitz
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

    – Double AA
    6 hours ago













  • Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

    – Dr. Shmuel
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

    – DonielF
    5 hours ago

















VTC as not Purim Torah

– Double AA
6 hours ago





VTC as not Purim Torah

– Double AA
6 hours ago













@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

– Leitz
6 hours ago





@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

– Leitz
6 hours ago




2




2





If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

– Double AA
6 hours ago







If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

– Double AA
6 hours ago















Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago





Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago




1




1





@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

– DonielF
5 hours ago





@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

– DonielF
5 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2














The proper way to punctuate it is




אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות



One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles




So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.






share|improve this answer
























  • +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

    – Asher
    21 mins ago



















1














In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.






share|improve this answer
























  • It also means if.

    – Dr. Shmuel
    3 hours ago



















1














The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.



So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.






share|improve this answer

































    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    The proper way to punctuate it is




    אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות



    One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles




    So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.






    share|improve this answer
























    • +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

      – Asher
      21 mins ago
















    2














    The proper way to punctuate it is




    אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות



    One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles




    So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.






    share|improve this answer
























    • +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

      – Asher
      21 mins ago














    2












    2








    2







    The proper way to punctuate it is




    אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות



    One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles




    So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.






    share|improve this answer













    The proper way to punctuate it is




    אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות



    One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles




    So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 25 mins ago









    Y     e     zY     e     z

    45.1k369201




    45.1k369201













    • +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

      – Asher
      21 mins ago



















    • +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

      – Asher
      21 mins ago

















    +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

    – Asher
    21 mins ago





    +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

    – Asher
    21 mins ago











    1














    In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.






    share|improve this answer
























    • It also means if.

      – Dr. Shmuel
      3 hours ago
















    1














    In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.






    share|improve this answer
























    • It also means if.

      – Dr. Shmuel
      3 hours ago














    1












    1








    1







    In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.






    share|improve this answer













    In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 3 hours ago









    Gershon GoldGershon Gold

    111k8178425




    111k8178425













    • It also means if.

      – Dr. Shmuel
      3 hours ago



















    • It also means if.

      – Dr. Shmuel
      3 hours ago

















    It also means if.

    – Dr. Shmuel
    3 hours ago





    It also means if.

    – Dr. Shmuel
    3 hours ago











    1














    The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.



    So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.






    share|improve this answer






























      1














      The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.



      So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.






      share|improve this answer




























        1












        1








        1







        The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.



        So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.






        share|improve this answer















        The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.



        So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 3 mins ago









        Alex

        22.3k154129




        22.3k154129










        answered 30 mins ago









        AsherAsher

        995




        995















            Popular posts from this blog

            サソリ

            広島県道265号伴広島線

            Setup Asymptote in Texstudio