Corrupted SD card Read only and not mounting












-2















I'm having issues trying to recover a corrupted micro-SD card (not the data, just the card). I think it was formated to be part of the internal storage of an Android phone when that was an option.



# lsblk -f
NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID MOUNTPOINT
sda
├─sda1 vfat 8F38-5495 /boot/efi
├─sda2 ext4 1d8431cf-f298-40af-be5d-413510537953 /boot
└─sda3 LVM2_mem mjbdHc-7AHE-LwUO-IlCo-chqH-EVhA-BVN0i4
├─fedora-root ext4 d38fec65-d7d1-40e2-9d16-dcbc0dcd6330 /
├─fedora-swap swap 6d365505-5e51-4bd5-8a93-bcd56ed1945d [SWAP]
└─fedora-home ext4 3f42f95e-85ce-44a6-9abf-474bf5ae3ab6 /home
sdb
├─sdb1
└─sdb2


-



# fdisk -l /dev/sdb
Disk /dev/sdb: 29.7 GiB, 31914983424 bytes, 62333952 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: 69704183-D789-43CC-A52A-6B69A888EA09

Device Start End Sectors Size Type
/dev/sdb1 2048 34815 32768 16M unknown
/dev/sdb2 34816 62333918 62299103 29.7G unknown


I tried fdisk /dev/sdb, it yields:



fdisk: cannot open /dev/sdb: Read-only file system


I checked the adapter and is not locked. I tried mount --options remount,rw /dev/sdb and it says:



mount: /dev/sdb: mount point not mounted or bad option.


without the remount option:



mount: /dev/sdb: can't find in /etc/fstab.


so apparently it's not mounted but still read only? anyway mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/ does not yield an assertive error message:



mount: /mnt: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.


Another output I got from reading stuff on the internet:



# e2fsck -f -n /dev/sdb
e2fsck 1.44.3 (10-July-2018)
e2fsck: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/sdb

The superblock could not be read or does not describe a valid ext2/ext3/ext4
filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2/ext3/ext4
filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock
is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock:
e2fsck -b 8193 <device>
or
e2fsck -b 32768 <device>

Found a gpt partition table in /dev/sdb


also tried both variants suggested and got the same output.
I'm not sure how to proceed as I can't get the card mounted (tried several filesystems) or even remove the read only condition. Any ideas?










share|improve this question







New contributor




vlizana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    -2















    I'm having issues trying to recover a corrupted micro-SD card (not the data, just the card). I think it was formated to be part of the internal storage of an Android phone when that was an option.



    # lsblk -f
    NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID MOUNTPOINT
    sda
    ├─sda1 vfat 8F38-5495 /boot/efi
    ├─sda2 ext4 1d8431cf-f298-40af-be5d-413510537953 /boot
    └─sda3 LVM2_mem mjbdHc-7AHE-LwUO-IlCo-chqH-EVhA-BVN0i4
    ├─fedora-root ext4 d38fec65-d7d1-40e2-9d16-dcbc0dcd6330 /
    ├─fedora-swap swap 6d365505-5e51-4bd5-8a93-bcd56ed1945d [SWAP]
    └─fedora-home ext4 3f42f95e-85ce-44a6-9abf-474bf5ae3ab6 /home
    sdb
    ├─sdb1
    └─sdb2


    -



    # fdisk -l /dev/sdb
    Disk /dev/sdb: 29.7 GiB, 31914983424 bytes, 62333952 sectors
    Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
    Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
    I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
    Disklabel type: gpt
    Disk identifier: 69704183-D789-43CC-A52A-6B69A888EA09

    Device Start End Sectors Size Type
    /dev/sdb1 2048 34815 32768 16M unknown
    /dev/sdb2 34816 62333918 62299103 29.7G unknown


    I tried fdisk /dev/sdb, it yields:



    fdisk: cannot open /dev/sdb: Read-only file system


    I checked the adapter and is not locked. I tried mount --options remount,rw /dev/sdb and it says:



    mount: /dev/sdb: mount point not mounted or bad option.


    without the remount option:



    mount: /dev/sdb: can't find in /etc/fstab.


    so apparently it's not mounted but still read only? anyway mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/ does not yield an assertive error message:



    mount: /mnt: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.


    Another output I got from reading stuff on the internet:



    # e2fsck -f -n /dev/sdb
    e2fsck 1.44.3 (10-July-2018)
    e2fsck: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/sdb

    The superblock could not be read or does not describe a valid ext2/ext3/ext4
    filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2/ext3/ext4
    filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock
    is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock:
    e2fsck -b 8193 <device>
    or
    e2fsck -b 32768 <device>

    Found a gpt partition table in /dev/sdb


    also tried both variants suggested and got the same output.
    I'm not sure how to proceed as I can't get the card mounted (tried several filesystems) or even remove the read only condition. Any ideas?










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    vlizana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      -2












      -2








      -2








      I'm having issues trying to recover a corrupted micro-SD card (not the data, just the card). I think it was formated to be part of the internal storage of an Android phone when that was an option.



      # lsblk -f
      NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID MOUNTPOINT
      sda
      ├─sda1 vfat 8F38-5495 /boot/efi
      ├─sda2 ext4 1d8431cf-f298-40af-be5d-413510537953 /boot
      └─sda3 LVM2_mem mjbdHc-7AHE-LwUO-IlCo-chqH-EVhA-BVN0i4
      ├─fedora-root ext4 d38fec65-d7d1-40e2-9d16-dcbc0dcd6330 /
      ├─fedora-swap swap 6d365505-5e51-4bd5-8a93-bcd56ed1945d [SWAP]
      └─fedora-home ext4 3f42f95e-85ce-44a6-9abf-474bf5ae3ab6 /home
      sdb
      ├─sdb1
      └─sdb2


      -



      # fdisk -l /dev/sdb
      Disk /dev/sdb: 29.7 GiB, 31914983424 bytes, 62333952 sectors
      Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
      Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
      I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
      Disklabel type: gpt
      Disk identifier: 69704183-D789-43CC-A52A-6B69A888EA09

      Device Start End Sectors Size Type
      /dev/sdb1 2048 34815 32768 16M unknown
      /dev/sdb2 34816 62333918 62299103 29.7G unknown


      I tried fdisk /dev/sdb, it yields:



      fdisk: cannot open /dev/sdb: Read-only file system


      I checked the adapter and is not locked. I tried mount --options remount,rw /dev/sdb and it says:



      mount: /dev/sdb: mount point not mounted or bad option.


      without the remount option:



      mount: /dev/sdb: can't find in /etc/fstab.


      so apparently it's not mounted but still read only? anyway mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/ does not yield an assertive error message:



      mount: /mnt: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.


      Another output I got from reading stuff on the internet:



      # e2fsck -f -n /dev/sdb
      e2fsck 1.44.3 (10-July-2018)
      e2fsck: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/sdb

      The superblock could not be read or does not describe a valid ext2/ext3/ext4
      filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2/ext3/ext4
      filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock
      is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock:
      e2fsck -b 8193 <device>
      or
      e2fsck -b 32768 <device>

      Found a gpt partition table in /dev/sdb


      also tried both variants suggested and got the same output.
      I'm not sure how to proceed as I can't get the card mounted (tried several filesystems) or even remove the read only condition. Any ideas?










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      vlizana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I'm having issues trying to recover a corrupted micro-SD card (not the data, just the card). I think it was formated to be part of the internal storage of an Android phone when that was an option.



      # lsblk -f
      NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID MOUNTPOINT
      sda
      ├─sda1 vfat 8F38-5495 /boot/efi
      ├─sda2 ext4 1d8431cf-f298-40af-be5d-413510537953 /boot
      └─sda3 LVM2_mem mjbdHc-7AHE-LwUO-IlCo-chqH-EVhA-BVN0i4
      ├─fedora-root ext4 d38fec65-d7d1-40e2-9d16-dcbc0dcd6330 /
      ├─fedora-swap swap 6d365505-5e51-4bd5-8a93-bcd56ed1945d [SWAP]
      └─fedora-home ext4 3f42f95e-85ce-44a6-9abf-474bf5ae3ab6 /home
      sdb
      ├─sdb1
      └─sdb2


      -



      # fdisk -l /dev/sdb
      Disk /dev/sdb: 29.7 GiB, 31914983424 bytes, 62333952 sectors
      Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
      Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
      I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
      Disklabel type: gpt
      Disk identifier: 69704183-D789-43CC-A52A-6B69A888EA09

      Device Start End Sectors Size Type
      /dev/sdb1 2048 34815 32768 16M unknown
      /dev/sdb2 34816 62333918 62299103 29.7G unknown


      I tried fdisk /dev/sdb, it yields:



      fdisk: cannot open /dev/sdb: Read-only file system


      I checked the adapter and is not locked. I tried mount --options remount,rw /dev/sdb and it says:



      mount: /dev/sdb: mount point not mounted or bad option.


      without the remount option:



      mount: /dev/sdb: can't find in /etc/fstab.


      so apparently it's not mounted but still read only? anyway mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/ does not yield an assertive error message:



      mount: /mnt: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.


      Another output I got from reading stuff on the internet:



      # e2fsck -f -n /dev/sdb
      e2fsck 1.44.3 (10-July-2018)
      e2fsck: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/sdb

      The superblock could not be read or does not describe a valid ext2/ext3/ext4
      filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2/ext3/ext4
      filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock
      is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock:
      e2fsck -b 8193 <device>
      or
      e2fsck -b 32768 <device>

      Found a gpt partition table in /dev/sdb


      also tried both variants suggested and got the same output.
      I'm not sure how to proceed as I can't get the card mounted (tried several filesystems) or even remove the read only condition. Any ideas?







      linux android fdisk sd-card udisks






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      vlizana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      vlizana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      vlizana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 hours ago









      vlizanavlizana

      972




      972




      New contributor




      vlizana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      vlizana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      vlizana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          vlizana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494331%2fcorrupted-sd-card-read-only-and-not-mounting%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          vlizana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          vlizana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          vlizana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          vlizana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494331%2fcorrupted-sd-card-read-only-and-not-mounting%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          サソリ

          広島県道265号伴広島線

          Setup Asymptote in Texstudio