Should a graduate student accept random offer to be a reviewer for IEEE Transactions paper?












11














I have been asked by a well-established professor to review a regular paper submitted to IEEE Transactions, however, I am concerned as in the email, he titled me "Dr. Monkia" although I am still being a graduate student. Of course, I am interested in the paper's topic, but I don't consider myself an expert. He asked if I couldn't review, I can ask a qualified colleague to do so, or let him know immediately.



I had been asked many times to review for predatory conferences or journals, of course, I declined. As far as I know, IEEE transactions are reputed, however, this sounds a little bit weird.



The question: as a graduate student should I accept to review or decline in that case (given the fact I know the topic)?










share|improve this question
























  • I'd reject it just because of my experience with IEEE in the past. But you might be interested in looking at academia.stackexchange.com/q/90986/1622 and academia.stackexchange.com/q/16825/1622
    – Joe
    14 hours ago










  • Here's a more sinister view: graduate students tend to be 'easy' reviewers given their inexperienced with the process and area. An editor may intentionally send you the paper so that his/her friend's paper goes through more easily. However, this could backfire because some graduate students think this recognition gives them the power to reject a paper if they find any faults, which could be minor and fixable.
    – Prof. Santa Claus
    8 hours ago


















11














I have been asked by a well-established professor to review a regular paper submitted to IEEE Transactions, however, I am concerned as in the email, he titled me "Dr. Monkia" although I am still being a graduate student. Of course, I am interested in the paper's topic, but I don't consider myself an expert. He asked if I couldn't review, I can ask a qualified colleague to do so, or let him know immediately.



I had been asked many times to review for predatory conferences or journals, of course, I declined. As far as I know, IEEE transactions are reputed, however, this sounds a little bit weird.



The question: as a graduate student should I accept to review or decline in that case (given the fact I know the topic)?










share|improve this question
























  • I'd reject it just because of my experience with IEEE in the past. But you might be interested in looking at academia.stackexchange.com/q/90986/1622 and academia.stackexchange.com/q/16825/1622
    – Joe
    14 hours ago










  • Here's a more sinister view: graduate students tend to be 'easy' reviewers given their inexperienced with the process and area. An editor may intentionally send you the paper so that his/her friend's paper goes through more easily. However, this could backfire because some graduate students think this recognition gives them the power to reject a paper if they find any faults, which could be minor and fixable.
    – Prof. Santa Claus
    8 hours ago
















11












11








11


1





I have been asked by a well-established professor to review a regular paper submitted to IEEE Transactions, however, I am concerned as in the email, he titled me "Dr. Monkia" although I am still being a graduate student. Of course, I am interested in the paper's topic, but I don't consider myself an expert. He asked if I couldn't review, I can ask a qualified colleague to do so, or let him know immediately.



I had been asked many times to review for predatory conferences or journals, of course, I declined. As far as I know, IEEE transactions are reputed, however, this sounds a little bit weird.



The question: as a graduate student should I accept to review or decline in that case (given the fact I know the topic)?










share|improve this question















I have been asked by a well-established professor to review a regular paper submitted to IEEE Transactions, however, I am concerned as in the email, he titled me "Dr. Monkia" although I am still being a graduate student. Of course, I am interested in the paper's topic, but I don't consider myself an expert. He asked if I couldn't review, I can ask a qualified colleague to do so, or let him know immediately.



I had been asked many times to review for predatory conferences or journals, of course, I declined. As far as I know, IEEE transactions are reputed, however, this sounds a little bit weird.



The question: as a graduate student should I accept to review or decline in that case (given the fact I know the topic)?







peer-review review-articles






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 24 mins ago









Bashful Beluga

1033




1033










asked 18 hours ago









Monika

432411




432411












  • I'd reject it just because of my experience with IEEE in the past. But you might be interested in looking at academia.stackexchange.com/q/90986/1622 and academia.stackexchange.com/q/16825/1622
    – Joe
    14 hours ago










  • Here's a more sinister view: graduate students tend to be 'easy' reviewers given their inexperienced with the process and area. An editor may intentionally send you the paper so that his/her friend's paper goes through more easily. However, this could backfire because some graduate students think this recognition gives them the power to reject a paper if they find any faults, which could be minor and fixable.
    – Prof. Santa Claus
    8 hours ago




















  • I'd reject it just because of my experience with IEEE in the past. But you might be interested in looking at academia.stackexchange.com/q/90986/1622 and academia.stackexchange.com/q/16825/1622
    – Joe
    14 hours ago










  • Here's a more sinister view: graduate students tend to be 'easy' reviewers given their inexperienced with the process and area. An editor may intentionally send you the paper so that his/her friend's paper goes through more easily. However, this could backfire because some graduate students think this recognition gives them the power to reject a paper if they find any faults, which could be minor and fixable.
    – Prof. Santa Claus
    8 hours ago


















I'd reject it just because of my experience with IEEE in the past. But you might be interested in looking at academia.stackexchange.com/q/90986/1622 and academia.stackexchange.com/q/16825/1622
– Joe
14 hours ago




I'd reject it just because of my experience with IEEE in the past. But you might be interested in looking at academia.stackexchange.com/q/90986/1622 and academia.stackexchange.com/q/16825/1622
– Joe
14 hours ago












Here's a more sinister view: graduate students tend to be 'easy' reviewers given their inexperienced with the process and area. An editor may intentionally send you the paper so that his/her friend's paper goes through more easily. However, this could backfire because some graduate students think this recognition gives them the power to reject a paper if they find any faults, which could be minor and fixable.
– Prof. Santa Claus
8 hours ago






Here's a more sinister view: graduate students tend to be 'easy' reviewers given their inexperienced with the process and area. An editor may intentionally send you the paper so that his/her friend's paper goes through more easily. However, this could backfire because some graduate students think this recognition gives them the power to reject a paper if they find any faults, which could be minor and fixable.
– Prof. Santa Claus
8 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















12














It is probably a good thing to do, just for the experience. It will also get you on the good side of the professor.



However, make sure, in accepting, that the professor and others know that you haven't finished your degree yet. That might cause them to withdraw the invitation, of course, but it should be made clear.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Of course, I will let him know, however, I don't know how they selected me in that case, is that randomly?
    – Monika
    18 hours ago






  • 3




    Reviewers aren't selected at random. It's possible that you were selected based on some paper you've written or presentation that you have given. One common strategy used by many editors is to ask the authors of papers that are cited in the submitted paper to review it.
    – Brian Borchers
    13 hours ago



















9














Chances are the editor noticed you authored a paper on a similar topic and is inviting you based on that.



There's no harm doing this. You might feel you're not qualified, but you're being invited, therefore the editor thinks you're qualified. You shouldn't worry about writing a bad review either - full professors can write crappy reviews also, and if you read the paper in detail chances are you're already going to write a better-than-average review! If you're still concerned, you can always talk to your supervisor.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    I am highly interested, as this is the first time to receive from IEEE Transaction. Do you think I should inform them that I didn't finish my degree?
    – Monika
    17 hours ago






  • 4




    You can if you want, but there's no need to.
    – Allure
    17 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f122000%2fshould-a-graduate-student-accept-random-offer-to-be-a-reviewer-for-ieee-transact%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









12














It is probably a good thing to do, just for the experience. It will also get you on the good side of the professor.



However, make sure, in accepting, that the professor and others know that you haven't finished your degree yet. That might cause them to withdraw the invitation, of course, but it should be made clear.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Of course, I will let him know, however, I don't know how they selected me in that case, is that randomly?
    – Monika
    18 hours ago






  • 3




    Reviewers aren't selected at random. It's possible that you were selected based on some paper you've written or presentation that you have given. One common strategy used by many editors is to ask the authors of papers that are cited in the submitted paper to review it.
    – Brian Borchers
    13 hours ago
















12














It is probably a good thing to do, just for the experience. It will also get you on the good side of the professor.



However, make sure, in accepting, that the professor and others know that you haven't finished your degree yet. That might cause them to withdraw the invitation, of course, but it should be made clear.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Of course, I will let him know, however, I don't know how they selected me in that case, is that randomly?
    – Monika
    18 hours ago






  • 3




    Reviewers aren't selected at random. It's possible that you were selected based on some paper you've written or presentation that you have given. One common strategy used by many editors is to ask the authors of papers that are cited in the submitted paper to review it.
    – Brian Borchers
    13 hours ago














12












12








12






It is probably a good thing to do, just for the experience. It will also get you on the good side of the professor.



However, make sure, in accepting, that the professor and others know that you haven't finished your degree yet. That might cause them to withdraw the invitation, of course, but it should be made clear.






share|improve this answer












It is probably a good thing to do, just for the experience. It will also get you on the good side of the professor.



However, make sure, in accepting, that the professor and others know that you haven't finished your degree yet. That might cause them to withdraw the invitation, of course, but it should be made clear.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 18 hours ago









Buffy

35.5k7113183




35.5k7113183








  • 1




    Of course, I will let him know, however, I don't know how they selected me in that case, is that randomly?
    – Monika
    18 hours ago






  • 3




    Reviewers aren't selected at random. It's possible that you were selected based on some paper you've written or presentation that you have given. One common strategy used by many editors is to ask the authors of papers that are cited in the submitted paper to review it.
    – Brian Borchers
    13 hours ago














  • 1




    Of course, I will let him know, however, I don't know how they selected me in that case, is that randomly?
    – Monika
    18 hours ago






  • 3




    Reviewers aren't selected at random. It's possible that you were selected based on some paper you've written or presentation that you have given. One common strategy used by many editors is to ask the authors of papers that are cited in the submitted paper to review it.
    – Brian Borchers
    13 hours ago








1




1




Of course, I will let him know, however, I don't know how they selected me in that case, is that randomly?
– Monika
18 hours ago




Of course, I will let him know, however, I don't know how they selected me in that case, is that randomly?
– Monika
18 hours ago




3




3




Reviewers aren't selected at random. It's possible that you were selected based on some paper you've written or presentation that you have given. One common strategy used by many editors is to ask the authors of papers that are cited in the submitted paper to review it.
– Brian Borchers
13 hours ago




Reviewers aren't selected at random. It's possible that you were selected based on some paper you've written or presentation that you have given. One common strategy used by many editors is to ask the authors of papers that are cited in the submitted paper to review it.
– Brian Borchers
13 hours ago











9














Chances are the editor noticed you authored a paper on a similar topic and is inviting you based on that.



There's no harm doing this. You might feel you're not qualified, but you're being invited, therefore the editor thinks you're qualified. You shouldn't worry about writing a bad review either - full professors can write crappy reviews also, and if you read the paper in detail chances are you're already going to write a better-than-average review! If you're still concerned, you can always talk to your supervisor.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    I am highly interested, as this is the first time to receive from IEEE Transaction. Do you think I should inform them that I didn't finish my degree?
    – Monika
    17 hours ago






  • 4




    You can if you want, but there's no need to.
    – Allure
    17 hours ago
















9














Chances are the editor noticed you authored a paper on a similar topic and is inviting you based on that.



There's no harm doing this. You might feel you're not qualified, but you're being invited, therefore the editor thinks you're qualified. You shouldn't worry about writing a bad review either - full professors can write crappy reviews also, and if you read the paper in detail chances are you're already going to write a better-than-average review! If you're still concerned, you can always talk to your supervisor.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    I am highly interested, as this is the first time to receive from IEEE Transaction. Do you think I should inform them that I didn't finish my degree?
    – Monika
    17 hours ago






  • 4




    You can if you want, but there's no need to.
    – Allure
    17 hours ago














9












9








9






Chances are the editor noticed you authored a paper on a similar topic and is inviting you based on that.



There's no harm doing this. You might feel you're not qualified, but you're being invited, therefore the editor thinks you're qualified. You shouldn't worry about writing a bad review either - full professors can write crappy reviews also, and if you read the paper in detail chances are you're already going to write a better-than-average review! If you're still concerned, you can always talk to your supervisor.






share|improve this answer












Chances are the editor noticed you authored a paper on a similar topic and is inviting you based on that.



There's no harm doing this. You might feel you're not qualified, but you're being invited, therefore the editor thinks you're qualified. You shouldn't worry about writing a bad review either - full professors can write crappy reviews also, and if you read the paper in detail chances are you're already going to write a better-than-average review! If you're still concerned, you can always talk to your supervisor.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 17 hours ago









Allure

26.1k1479128




26.1k1479128








  • 1




    I am highly interested, as this is the first time to receive from IEEE Transaction. Do you think I should inform them that I didn't finish my degree?
    – Monika
    17 hours ago






  • 4




    You can if you want, but there's no need to.
    – Allure
    17 hours ago














  • 1




    I am highly interested, as this is the first time to receive from IEEE Transaction. Do you think I should inform them that I didn't finish my degree?
    – Monika
    17 hours ago






  • 4




    You can if you want, but there's no need to.
    – Allure
    17 hours ago








1




1




I am highly interested, as this is the first time to receive from IEEE Transaction. Do you think I should inform them that I didn't finish my degree?
– Monika
17 hours ago




I am highly interested, as this is the first time to receive from IEEE Transaction. Do you think I should inform them that I didn't finish my degree?
– Monika
17 hours ago




4




4




You can if you want, but there's no need to.
– Allure
17 hours ago




You can if you want, but there's no need to.
– Allure
17 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f122000%2fshould-a-graduate-student-accept-random-offer-to-be-a-reviewer-for-ieee-transact%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

サソリ

広島県道265号伴広島線

Setup Asymptote in Texstudio