Alternative proof that if $a,b,c in mathbb{R}$ and $(a+b+c)c0$?











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2












A problem from a Moscow Olympiad states : let $a,b,c$ be real numbers such that $(a+b+c)c<0$. Show that $b^2-4ac>0$. There is a well known proof of this applying the IVT on the polynomial $f(x) = ax^2+bx+c$. Is there any proof that does not involve any calculus, including IVT?



The question emerged from a reddit post
https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9znumt/theorems_of_single_variable_calculus/










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    2












    A problem from a Moscow Olympiad states : let $a,b,c$ be real numbers such that $(a+b+c)c<0$. Show that $b^2-4ac>0$. There is a well known proof of this applying the IVT on the polynomial $f(x) = ax^2+bx+c$. Is there any proof that does not involve any calculus, including IVT?



    The question emerged from a reddit post
    https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9znumt/theorems_of_single_variable_calculus/










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      2









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      2






      2





      A problem from a Moscow Olympiad states : let $a,b,c$ be real numbers such that $(a+b+c)c<0$. Show that $b^2-4ac>0$. There is a well known proof of this applying the IVT on the polynomial $f(x) = ax^2+bx+c$. Is there any proof that does not involve any calculus, including IVT?



      The question emerged from a reddit post
      https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9znumt/theorems_of_single_variable_calculus/










      share|cite|improve this question















      A problem from a Moscow Olympiad states : let $a,b,c$ be real numbers such that $(a+b+c)c<0$. Show that $b^2-4ac>0$. There is a well known proof of this applying the IVT on the polynomial $f(x) = ax^2+bx+c$. Is there any proof that does not involve any calculus, including IVT?



      The question emerged from a reddit post
      https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9znumt/theorems_of_single_variable_calculus/







      inequality contest-math






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      user21820

      38k541149




      38k541149










      asked yesterday









      guest

      4,207919




      4,207919






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          10
          down vote



          accepted










          We have
          $$
          (b^2 - 4ac) + 4(a+b+c)c = (b+2c)^2 ge 0 \
          implies b^2 - 4ac ge - 4(a+b+c)c > 0
          $$



          To give proper credit: The above approach was found after reading
          guest's answer
          and is just a simplification of that solution.






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
            – guest
            yesterday






          • 4




            @guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
            – Martin R
            yesterday




















          up vote
          7
          down vote













          Here is a proof that works for any ordered commutative ring:



          Let $a,b,c$ be rationals, reals or elements of any non-trivial ordered commutative ring. Assume that $(a+b+c)c<0$. We show that $b^2-4ac>0$.



          Solution:



          First, observe that the hypothesis implies $(a+b)c<-c ^2$ and that $cneq 0$.
          Then form the matrix
          $$M = left( begin{array}{cc}
          2c & b \
          b & 2a \
          end{array}right)$$

          whose determinant is precicely $4ac-b^2$, and the matrix
          $$ S = left( begin{array}{cc}
          1 & 0 \
          2 & 1 \
          end{array}right)$$

          whose determinant is $1$. Now from the multiplicativity of the determinant $det(SM) =det(S)det(M)=det(M)$. But
          $$det(SM) = det
          left( begin{array}{cc}
          2c & b \
          4c+b & 2(a+b) \
          end{array}right) = 4c(a+b) - b^2-4bc.$$



          But recall that $c(a+b)<-c^2$ so $$4c(a+b)-b^2-4bc < -4c^2-b^2 -4bc = -(b+2c)^2.$$
          The last element is always non-positive and the inequality is strict, so $det(M)=4ac-b^2<0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • $b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
            – Martin R
            yesterday










          • @MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
            – guest
            yesterday




















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          If all you know is completing the square:



          Suppose $b^2-4acleq0$. Then we know the quadratic $ax^2+bx+c$ has at most one real root.



          By completing the square we can rewrite $ax^2+bx+c=aleft(left(x+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2right)$ for some real $d$.



          We have $c=frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2$. Returning to the original expression, complete all the squares:



          $$begin{align}(a+b+c)c&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)left(frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)\
          &=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)frac{b^2}{4a}+left(ad^2frac{b^2}{4a}+left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)ad^2right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
          &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{a}+frac{b^2}{4a^2}right)+d^2left(a^2+ab+frac{b^2}{2}right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
          &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2left(a+frac{b}{2}right)^2+left(ad^2right)^2\
          &geq0text{.}
          end{align}$$

          Thus by contrapositive, $(a+b+c)c<0,Rightarrow, b^2-4ac>0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer








          New contributor




          obscurans is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.

























            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Here's a silly proof deriving a contradiction from assuming that $(a + b + c)c lt 0 $ and $b^2-4ac le 0$ are simultaneously true.



            1) By assumption



            $$ (a + b + c) c lt 0 $$



            2) Negation of goal: $ b^2 - 4ac gt 0$



            $$ b^2 - 4ac le 0 $$



            3) From 2 by addition



            $$ b^2 le 4ac $$



            4) expand 1



            $$ ac + bc + c^2 < 0 $$



            5) From 4 by addition



            $$ ac < -bc - c^2 $$



            6) From 5 by multiplication



            $$ 4ac < -4bc -4c^2 $$



            7) transitivity $x le y lt z$ implies $x lt z$



            $$ b^2 lt -4bc - 4c^2 $$



            8) from 7 by addition.



            $$ b^2 + 4bc + 4c^2 gt 0 $$



            9) (7) is a perfect square



            $$ (b + 2c)^2 < 0 $$



            10) By assumption, $a, b, c in mathbb{R}$, so the square of $(b + 2c)$ cannot be negative.



            $$ bot $$



            Therefore, $b^2 - 4ac gt 0$ .






            share|cite|improve this answer























              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010886%2falternative-proof-that-if-a-b-c-in-mathbbr-and-abcc0-then-b2-4ac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              10
              down vote



              accepted










              We have
              $$
              (b^2 - 4ac) + 4(a+b+c)c = (b+2c)^2 ge 0 \
              implies b^2 - 4ac ge - 4(a+b+c)c > 0
              $$



              To give proper credit: The above approach was found after reading
              guest's answer
              and is just a simplification of that solution.






              share|cite|improve this answer



















              • 1




                Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
                – guest
                yesterday






              • 4




                @guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
                – Martin R
                yesterday

















              up vote
              10
              down vote



              accepted










              We have
              $$
              (b^2 - 4ac) + 4(a+b+c)c = (b+2c)^2 ge 0 \
              implies b^2 - 4ac ge - 4(a+b+c)c > 0
              $$



              To give proper credit: The above approach was found after reading
              guest's answer
              and is just a simplification of that solution.






              share|cite|improve this answer



















              • 1




                Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
                – guest
                yesterday






              • 4




                @guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
                – Martin R
                yesterday















              up vote
              10
              down vote



              accepted







              up vote
              10
              down vote



              accepted






              We have
              $$
              (b^2 - 4ac) + 4(a+b+c)c = (b+2c)^2 ge 0 \
              implies b^2 - 4ac ge - 4(a+b+c)c > 0
              $$



              To give proper credit: The above approach was found after reading
              guest's answer
              and is just a simplification of that solution.






              share|cite|improve this answer














              We have
              $$
              (b^2 - 4ac) + 4(a+b+c)c = (b+2c)^2 ge 0 \
              implies b^2 - 4ac ge - 4(a+b+c)c > 0
              $$



              To give proper credit: The above approach was found after reading
              guest's answer
              and is just a simplification of that solution.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited yesterday

























              answered yesterday









              Martin R

              25.9k32946




              25.9k32946








              • 1




                Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
                – guest
                yesterday






              • 4




                @guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
                – Martin R
                yesterday
















              • 1




                Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
                – guest
                yesterday






              • 4




                @guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
                – Martin R
                yesterday










              1




              1




              Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
              – guest
              yesterday




              Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
              – guest
              yesterday




              4




              4




              @guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
              – Martin R
              yesterday






              @guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
              – Martin R
              yesterday












              up vote
              7
              down vote













              Here is a proof that works for any ordered commutative ring:



              Let $a,b,c$ be rationals, reals or elements of any non-trivial ordered commutative ring. Assume that $(a+b+c)c<0$. We show that $b^2-4ac>0$.



              Solution:



              First, observe that the hypothesis implies $(a+b)c<-c ^2$ and that $cneq 0$.
              Then form the matrix
              $$M = left( begin{array}{cc}
              2c & b \
              b & 2a \
              end{array}right)$$

              whose determinant is precicely $4ac-b^2$, and the matrix
              $$ S = left( begin{array}{cc}
              1 & 0 \
              2 & 1 \
              end{array}right)$$

              whose determinant is $1$. Now from the multiplicativity of the determinant $det(SM) =det(S)det(M)=det(M)$. But
              $$det(SM) = det
              left( begin{array}{cc}
              2c & b \
              4c+b & 2(a+b) \
              end{array}right) = 4c(a+b) - b^2-4bc.$$



              But recall that $c(a+b)<-c^2$ so $$4c(a+b)-b^2-4bc < -4c^2-b^2 -4bc = -(b+2c)^2.$$
              The last element is always non-positive and the inequality is strict, so $det(M)=4ac-b^2<0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer





















              • $b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
                – Martin R
                yesterday










              • @MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
                – guest
                yesterday

















              up vote
              7
              down vote













              Here is a proof that works for any ordered commutative ring:



              Let $a,b,c$ be rationals, reals or elements of any non-trivial ordered commutative ring. Assume that $(a+b+c)c<0$. We show that $b^2-4ac>0$.



              Solution:



              First, observe that the hypothesis implies $(a+b)c<-c ^2$ and that $cneq 0$.
              Then form the matrix
              $$M = left( begin{array}{cc}
              2c & b \
              b & 2a \
              end{array}right)$$

              whose determinant is precicely $4ac-b^2$, and the matrix
              $$ S = left( begin{array}{cc}
              1 & 0 \
              2 & 1 \
              end{array}right)$$

              whose determinant is $1$. Now from the multiplicativity of the determinant $det(SM) =det(S)det(M)=det(M)$. But
              $$det(SM) = det
              left( begin{array}{cc}
              2c & b \
              4c+b & 2(a+b) \
              end{array}right) = 4c(a+b) - b^2-4bc.$$



              But recall that $c(a+b)<-c^2$ so $$4c(a+b)-b^2-4bc < -4c^2-b^2 -4bc = -(b+2c)^2.$$
              The last element is always non-positive and the inequality is strict, so $det(M)=4ac-b^2<0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer





















              • $b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
                – Martin R
                yesterday










              • @MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
                – guest
                yesterday















              up vote
              7
              down vote










              up vote
              7
              down vote









              Here is a proof that works for any ordered commutative ring:



              Let $a,b,c$ be rationals, reals or elements of any non-trivial ordered commutative ring. Assume that $(a+b+c)c<0$. We show that $b^2-4ac>0$.



              Solution:



              First, observe that the hypothesis implies $(a+b)c<-c ^2$ and that $cneq 0$.
              Then form the matrix
              $$M = left( begin{array}{cc}
              2c & b \
              b & 2a \
              end{array}right)$$

              whose determinant is precicely $4ac-b^2$, and the matrix
              $$ S = left( begin{array}{cc}
              1 & 0 \
              2 & 1 \
              end{array}right)$$

              whose determinant is $1$. Now from the multiplicativity of the determinant $det(SM) =det(S)det(M)=det(M)$. But
              $$det(SM) = det
              left( begin{array}{cc}
              2c & b \
              4c+b & 2(a+b) \
              end{array}right) = 4c(a+b) - b^2-4bc.$$



              But recall that $c(a+b)<-c^2$ so $$4c(a+b)-b^2-4bc < -4c^2-b^2 -4bc = -(b+2c)^2.$$
              The last element is always non-positive and the inequality is strict, so $det(M)=4ac-b^2<0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer












              Here is a proof that works for any ordered commutative ring:



              Let $a,b,c$ be rationals, reals or elements of any non-trivial ordered commutative ring. Assume that $(a+b+c)c<0$. We show that $b^2-4ac>0$.



              Solution:



              First, observe that the hypothesis implies $(a+b)c<-c ^2$ and that $cneq 0$.
              Then form the matrix
              $$M = left( begin{array}{cc}
              2c & b \
              b & 2a \
              end{array}right)$$

              whose determinant is precicely $4ac-b^2$, and the matrix
              $$ S = left( begin{array}{cc}
              1 & 0 \
              2 & 1 \
              end{array}right)$$

              whose determinant is $1$. Now from the multiplicativity of the determinant $det(SM) =det(S)det(M)=det(M)$. But
              $$det(SM) = det
              left( begin{array}{cc}
              2c & b \
              4c+b & 2(a+b) \
              end{array}right) = 4c(a+b) - b^2-4bc.$$



              But recall that $c(a+b)<-c^2$ so $$4c(a+b)-b^2-4bc < -4c^2-b^2 -4bc = -(b+2c)^2.$$
              The last element is always non-positive and the inequality is strict, so $det(M)=4ac-b^2<0$.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered yesterday









              guest

              4,207919




              4,207919












              • $b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
                – Martin R
                yesterday










              • @MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
                – guest
                yesterday




















              • $b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
                – Martin R
                yesterday










              • @MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
                – guest
                yesterday


















              $b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
              – Martin R
              yesterday




              $b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
              – Martin R
              yesterday












              @MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
              – guest
              yesterday






              @MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
              – guest
              yesterday












              up vote
              3
              down vote













              If all you know is completing the square:



              Suppose $b^2-4acleq0$. Then we know the quadratic $ax^2+bx+c$ has at most one real root.



              By completing the square we can rewrite $ax^2+bx+c=aleft(left(x+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2right)$ for some real $d$.



              We have $c=frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2$. Returning to the original expression, complete all the squares:



              $$begin{align}(a+b+c)c&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)left(frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)\
              &=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)frac{b^2}{4a}+left(ad^2frac{b^2}{4a}+left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)ad^2right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
              &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{a}+frac{b^2}{4a^2}right)+d^2left(a^2+ab+frac{b^2}{2}right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
              &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2left(a+frac{b}{2}right)^2+left(ad^2right)^2\
              &geq0text{.}
              end{align}$$

              Thus by contrapositive, $(a+b+c)c<0,Rightarrow, b^2-4ac>0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer








              New contributor




              obscurans is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                up vote
                3
                down vote













                If all you know is completing the square:



                Suppose $b^2-4acleq0$. Then we know the quadratic $ax^2+bx+c$ has at most one real root.



                By completing the square we can rewrite $ax^2+bx+c=aleft(left(x+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2right)$ for some real $d$.



                We have $c=frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2$. Returning to the original expression, complete all the squares:



                $$begin{align}(a+b+c)c&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)left(frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)\
                &=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)frac{b^2}{4a}+left(ad^2frac{b^2}{4a}+left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)ad^2right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
                &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{a}+frac{b^2}{4a^2}right)+d^2left(a^2+ab+frac{b^2}{2}right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
                &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2left(a+frac{b}{2}right)^2+left(ad^2right)^2\
                &geq0text{.}
                end{align}$$

                Thus by contrapositive, $(a+b+c)c<0,Rightarrow, b^2-4ac>0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer








                New contributor




                obscurans is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote









                  If all you know is completing the square:



                  Suppose $b^2-4acleq0$. Then we know the quadratic $ax^2+bx+c$ has at most one real root.



                  By completing the square we can rewrite $ax^2+bx+c=aleft(left(x+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2right)$ for some real $d$.



                  We have $c=frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2$. Returning to the original expression, complete all the squares:



                  $$begin{align}(a+b+c)c&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)left(frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)\
                  &=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)frac{b^2}{4a}+left(ad^2frac{b^2}{4a}+left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)ad^2right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
                  &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{a}+frac{b^2}{4a^2}right)+d^2left(a^2+ab+frac{b^2}{2}right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
                  &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2left(a+frac{b}{2}right)^2+left(ad^2right)^2\
                  &geq0text{.}
                  end{align}$$

                  Thus by contrapositive, $(a+b+c)c<0,Rightarrow, b^2-4ac>0$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  obscurans is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  If all you know is completing the square:



                  Suppose $b^2-4acleq0$. Then we know the quadratic $ax^2+bx+c$ has at most one real root.



                  By completing the square we can rewrite $ax^2+bx+c=aleft(left(x+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2right)$ for some real $d$.



                  We have $c=frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2$. Returning to the original expression, complete all the squares:



                  $$begin{align}(a+b+c)c&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)left(frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)\
                  &=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)frac{b^2}{4a}+left(ad^2frac{b^2}{4a}+left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)ad^2right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
                  &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{a}+frac{b^2}{4a^2}right)+d^2left(a^2+ab+frac{b^2}{2}right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
                  &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2left(a+frac{b}{2}right)^2+left(ad^2right)^2\
                  &geq0text{.}
                  end{align}$$

                  Thus by contrapositive, $(a+b+c)c<0,Rightarrow, b^2-4ac>0$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  obscurans is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  obscurans is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered yesterday









                  obscurans

                  664




                  664




                  New contributor




                  obscurans is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  obscurans is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  obscurans is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      Here's a silly proof deriving a contradiction from assuming that $(a + b + c)c lt 0 $ and $b^2-4ac le 0$ are simultaneously true.



                      1) By assumption



                      $$ (a + b + c) c lt 0 $$



                      2) Negation of goal: $ b^2 - 4ac gt 0$



                      $$ b^2 - 4ac le 0 $$



                      3) From 2 by addition



                      $$ b^2 le 4ac $$



                      4) expand 1



                      $$ ac + bc + c^2 < 0 $$



                      5) From 4 by addition



                      $$ ac < -bc - c^2 $$



                      6) From 5 by multiplication



                      $$ 4ac < -4bc -4c^2 $$



                      7) transitivity $x le y lt z$ implies $x lt z$



                      $$ b^2 lt -4bc - 4c^2 $$



                      8) from 7 by addition.



                      $$ b^2 + 4bc + 4c^2 gt 0 $$



                      9) (7) is a perfect square



                      $$ (b + 2c)^2 < 0 $$



                      10) By assumption, $a, b, c in mathbb{R}$, so the square of $(b + 2c)$ cannot be negative.



                      $$ bot $$



                      Therefore, $b^2 - 4ac gt 0$ .






                      share|cite|improve this answer



























                        up vote
                        2
                        down vote













                        Here's a silly proof deriving a contradiction from assuming that $(a + b + c)c lt 0 $ and $b^2-4ac le 0$ are simultaneously true.



                        1) By assumption



                        $$ (a + b + c) c lt 0 $$



                        2) Negation of goal: $ b^2 - 4ac gt 0$



                        $$ b^2 - 4ac le 0 $$



                        3) From 2 by addition



                        $$ b^2 le 4ac $$



                        4) expand 1



                        $$ ac + bc + c^2 < 0 $$



                        5) From 4 by addition



                        $$ ac < -bc - c^2 $$



                        6) From 5 by multiplication



                        $$ 4ac < -4bc -4c^2 $$



                        7) transitivity $x le y lt z$ implies $x lt z$



                        $$ b^2 lt -4bc - 4c^2 $$



                        8) from 7 by addition.



                        $$ b^2 + 4bc + 4c^2 gt 0 $$



                        9) (7) is a perfect square



                        $$ (b + 2c)^2 < 0 $$



                        10) By assumption, $a, b, c in mathbb{R}$, so the square of $(b + 2c)$ cannot be negative.



                        $$ bot $$



                        Therefore, $b^2 - 4ac gt 0$ .






                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          2
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          2
                          down vote









                          Here's a silly proof deriving a contradiction from assuming that $(a + b + c)c lt 0 $ and $b^2-4ac le 0$ are simultaneously true.



                          1) By assumption



                          $$ (a + b + c) c lt 0 $$



                          2) Negation of goal: $ b^2 - 4ac gt 0$



                          $$ b^2 - 4ac le 0 $$



                          3) From 2 by addition



                          $$ b^2 le 4ac $$



                          4) expand 1



                          $$ ac + bc + c^2 < 0 $$



                          5) From 4 by addition



                          $$ ac < -bc - c^2 $$



                          6) From 5 by multiplication



                          $$ 4ac < -4bc -4c^2 $$



                          7) transitivity $x le y lt z$ implies $x lt z$



                          $$ b^2 lt -4bc - 4c^2 $$



                          8) from 7 by addition.



                          $$ b^2 + 4bc + 4c^2 gt 0 $$



                          9) (7) is a perfect square



                          $$ (b + 2c)^2 < 0 $$



                          10) By assumption, $a, b, c in mathbb{R}$, so the square of $(b + 2c)$ cannot be negative.



                          $$ bot $$



                          Therefore, $b^2 - 4ac gt 0$ .






                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          Here's a silly proof deriving a contradiction from assuming that $(a + b + c)c lt 0 $ and $b^2-4ac le 0$ are simultaneously true.



                          1) By assumption



                          $$ (a + b + c) c lt 0 $$



                          2) Negation of goal: $ b^2 - 4ac gt 0$



                          $$ b^2 - 4ac le 0 $$



                          3) From 2 by addition



                          $$ b^2 le 4ac $$



                          4) expand 1



                          $$ ac + bc + c^2 < 0 $$



                          5) From 4 by addition



                          $$ ac < -bc - c^2 $$



                          6) From 5 by multiplication



                          $$ 4ac < -4bc -4c^2 $$



                          7) transitivity $x le y lt z$ implies $x lt z$



                          $$ b^2 lt -4bc - 4c^2 $$



                          8) from 7 by addition.



                          $$ b^2 + 4bc + 4c^2 gt 0 $$



                          9) (7) is a perfect square



                          $$ (b + 2c)^2 < 0 $$



                          10) By assumption, $a, b, c in mathbb{R}$, so the square of $(b + 2c)$ cannot be negative.



                          $$ bot $$



                          Therefore, $b^2 - 4ac gt 0$ .







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited yesterday

























                          answered yesterday









                          Gregory Nisbet

                          368211




                          368211






























                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded



















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010886%2falternative-proof-that-if-a-b-c-in-mathbbr-and-abcc0-then-b2-4ac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              サソリ

                              広島県道265号伴広島線

                              Setup Asymptote in Texstudio